-
Mas, S.; Marleau, Y.: Proposition of a faceted classification model to support corporate information organization and digital records management (2009)
0.29
0.2938441 = product of:
0.44076613 = sum of:
0.056410737 = product of:
0.1692322 = sum of:
0.1692322 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1692322 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
0.30111524 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.1692322 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1692322 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
0.30111524 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
0.022076517 = weight(_text_:use in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022076517 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10875683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.20298971 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
0.01410293 = weight(_text_:of in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01410293 = score(doc=2918,freq=12.0), product of:
0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.25392252 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
0.1692322 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1692322 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
0.30111524 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
0.009711544 = product of:
0.029134631 = sum of:
0.029134631 = weight(_text_:29 in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029134631 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12493842 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.6666667 = coord(6/9)
- Abstract
- The employees of an organization often use a personal hierarchical classification scheme to organize digital documents that are stored on their own workstations. As this may make it hard for other employees to retrieve these documents, there is a risk that the organization will lose track of needed documentation. Furthermore, the inherent boundaries of such a hierarchical structure require making arbitrary decisions about which specific criteria the classification will b.e based on (for instance, the administrative activity or the document type, although a document can have several attributes and require classification in several classes).A faceted classification model to support corporate information organization is proposed. Partially based on Ranganathan's facets theory, this model aims not only to standardize the organization of digital documents, but also to simplify the management of a document throughout its life cycle for both individuals and organizations, while ensuring compliance to regulatory and policy requirements.
- Date
- 29. 8.2009 21:15:48
- Footnote
- Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?reload=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4755313%2F4755314%2F04755480.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4755480&authDecision=-203.
-
Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004)
0.23
0.23187417 = product of:
0.41737348 = sum of:
0.056410737 = product of:
0.1692322 = sum of:
0.1692322 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1692322 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.30111524 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.1692322 = weight(_text_:2f in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1692322 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.30111524 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.012874156 = weight(_text_:of in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012874156 = score(doc=562,freq=10.0), product of:
0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.23179851 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.1692322 = weight(_text_:2f in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1692322 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.30111524 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.009624182 = product of:
0.028872546 = sum of:
0.028872546 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028872546 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1243752 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5555556 = coord(5/9)
- Abstract
- Document representations for text classification are typically based on the classical Bag-Of-Words paradigm. This approach comes with deficiencies that motivate the integration of features on a higher semantic level than single words. In this paper we propose an enhancement of the classical document representation through concepts extracted from background knowledge. Boosting is used for actual classification. Experimental evaluations on two well known text corpora support our approach through consistent improvement of the results.
- Content
- Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
- Date
- 8. 1.2013 10:22:32
- Source
- Proceedings of the 4th IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM 2004), 1-4 November 2004, Brighton, UK
-
Vetere, G.; Lenzerini, M.: Models for semantic interoperability in service-oriented architectures (2005)
0.21
0.21264863 = product of:
0.47845942 = sum of:
0.06581253 = product of:
0.19743758 = sum of:
0.19743758 = weight(_text_:3a in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19743758 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
0.30111524 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.19743758 = weight(_text_:2f in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19743758 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
0.30111524 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
0.017771725 = weight(_text_:of in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017771725 = score(doc=306,freq=14.0), product of:
0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.31997898 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
0.19743758 = weight(_text_:2f in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19743758 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
0.30111524 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
0.44444445 = coord(4/9)
- Abstract
- Although service-oriented architectures go a long way toward providing interoperability in distributed, heterogeneous environments, managing semantic differences in such environments remains a challenge. We give an overview of the issue of semantic interoperability (integration), provide a semantic characterization of services, and discuss the role of ontologies. Then we analyze four basic models of semantic interoperability that differ in respect to their mapping between service descriptions and ontologies and in respect to where the evaluation of the integration logic is performed. We also provide some guidelines for selecting one of the possible interoperability models.
- Content
- Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5386707&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D5386707.
-
Stojanovic, N.: Ontology-based Information Retrieval : methods and tools for cooperative query answering (2005)
0.18
0.184635 = product of:
0.33234298 = sum of:
0.037607156 = product of:
0.11282147 = sum of:
0.11282147 = weight(_text_:3a in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11282147 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
0.30111524 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.053739566 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053739566 = score(doc=701,freq=28.0), product of:
0.10743652 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.5001983 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
28.0 = termFreq=28.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
0.11282147 = weight(_text_:2f in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11282147 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
0.30111524 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
0.015353328 = weight(_text_:of in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015353328 = score(doc=701,freq=32.0), product of:
0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
5.656854 = tf(freq=32.0), with freq of:
32.0 = termFreq=32.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
0.11282147 = weight(_text_:2f in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11282147 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
0.30111524 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
0.5555556 = coord(5/9)
- Abstract
- By the explosion of possibilities for a ubiquitous content production, the information overload problem reaches the level of complexity which cannot be managed by traditional modelling approaches anymore. Due to their pure syntactical nature traditional information retrieval approaches did not succeed in treating content itself (i.e. its meaning, and not its representation). This leads to a very low usefulness of the results of a retrieval process for a user's task at hand. In the last ten years ontologies have been emerged from an interesting conceptualisation paradigm to a very promising (semantic) modelling technology, especially in the context of the Semantic Web. From the information retrieval point of view, ontologies enable a machine-understandable form of content description, such that the retrieval process can be driven by the meaning of the content. However, the very ambiguous nature of the retrieval process in which a user, due to the unfamiliarity with the underlying repository and/or query syntax, just approximates his information need in a query, implies a necessity to include the user in the retrieval process more actively in order to close the gap between the meaning of the content and the meaning of a user's query (i.e. his information need). This thesis lays foundation for such an ontology-based interactive retrieval process, in which the retrieval system interacts with a user in order to conceptually interpret the meaning of his query, whereas the underlying domain ontology drives the conceptualisation process. In that way the retrieval process evolves from a query evaluation process into a highly interactive cooperation between a user and the retrieval system, in which the system tries to anticipate the user's information need and to deliver the relevant content proactively. Moreover, the notion of content relevance for a user's query evolves from a content dependent artefact to the multidimensional context-dependent structure, strongly influenced by the user's preferences. This cooperation process is realized as the so-called Librarian Agent Query Refinement Process. In order to clarify the impact of an ontology on the retrieval process (regarding its complexity and quality), a set of methods and tools for different levels of content and query formalisation is developed, ranging from pure ontology-based inferencing to keyword-based querying in which semantics automatically emerges from the results. Our evaluation studies have shown that the possibilities to conceptualize a user's information need in the right manner and to interpret the retrieval results accordingly are key issues for realizing much more meaningful information retrieval systems.
- Content
- Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F1627&ei=tAtYUYrBNoHKtQb3l4GYBw&usg=AFQjCNHeaxKkKU3-u54LWxMNYGXaaDLCGw&sig2=8WykXWQoDKjDSdGtAakH2Q&bvm=bv.44442042,d.Yms.
-
Schrodt, R.: Tiefen und Untiefen im wissenschaftlichen Sprachgebrauch (2008)
0.18
0.17550007 = product of:
0.52650017 = sum of:
0.07521431 = product of:
0.22564293 = sum of:
0.22564293 = weight(_text_:3a in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.22564293 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
0.30111524 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.22564293 = weight(_text_:2f in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.22564293 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
0.30111524 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
0.22564293 = weight(_text_:2f in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.22564293 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
0.30111524 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Content
- Vgl. auch: https://studylibde.com/doc/13053640/richard-schrodt. Vgl. auch: http%3A%2F%2Fwww.univie.ac.at%2FGermanistik%2Fschrodt%2Fvorlesung%2Fwissenschaftssprache.doc&usg=AOvVaw1lDLDR6NFf1W0-oC9mEUJf.
-
Donsbach, W.: Wahrheit in den Medien : über den Sinn eines methodischen Objektivitätsbegriffes (2001)
0.11
0.10968755 = product of:
0.32906264 = sum of:
0.047008947 = product of:
0.14102684 = sum of:
0.14102684 = weight(_text_:3a in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14102684 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
0.30111524 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.14102684 = weight(_text_:2f in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14102684 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
0.30111524 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
0.14102684 = weight(_text_:2f in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14102684 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
0.30111524 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Source
- Politische Meinung. 381(2001) Nr.1, S.65-74 [https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dgfe.de%2Ffileadmin%2FOrdnerRedakteure%2FSektionen%2FSek02_AEW%2FKWF%2FPublikationen_Reihe_1989-2003%2FBand_17%2FBd_17_1994_355-406_A.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2KcbRsHy5UQ9QRIUyuOLNi]
-
Mudge, S.; Hoek, D.J.: Describing jazz, blues, and popular 78 rpm sound recordings : suggestions and guidelines (2000)
0.07
0.067617394 = product of:
0.20285217 = sum of:
0.016453419 = weight(_text_:of in 965) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016453419 = score(doc=965,freq=12.0), product of:
0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.29624295 = fieldWeight in 965, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=965)
0.17506863 = weight(_text_:discs in 965) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17506863 = score(doc=965,freq=2.0), product of:
0.28354502 = queryWeight, product of:
7.983315 = idf(docFreq=40, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.617428 = fieldWeight in 965, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.983315 = idf(docFreq=40, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=965)
0.011330134 = product of:
0.0339904 = sum of:
0.0339904 = weight(_text_:29 in 965) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0339904 = score(doc=965,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12493842 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 965, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=965)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Abstract
- Since 78 rpm sound recordings of jazz, blues, and popular music are today a specialized medium, they receive limited attention in cataloging rules and guides. The cataloging of 78 rpm discs at Indiana University's Archives of Traditional Music is based on established standards; nevertheless, certain local decisions are necessary when general rules are not clear. The Archives' decisions related to the description of their 78 rpm collections are explained and presented with examples in MARC format, and issues of access related to the choice of main entry are also covered
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 29(2000) no.3, S.21-47
-
Buxton, A.; Hopkinson, A.: ¬The CDS/ISIS for Windows handbook (2001)
0.05
0.05118581 = product of:
0.15355742 = sum of:
0.08795201 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 775) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08795201 = score(doc=775,freq=12.0), product of:
0.10743652 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.81864166 = fieldWeight in 775, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=775)
0.052034855 = weight(_text_:use in 775) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052034855 = score(doc=775,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10875683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.47845137 = fieldWeight in 775, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=775)
0.013570553 = weight(_text_:of in 775) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013570553 = score(doc=775,freq=4.0), product of:
0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.24433708 = fieldWeight in 775, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=775)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- COMPASS
- Information retrieval / Use of / On-line computers
- LCSH
- ISIS (Information retrieval system) / Handbooks, manuals, etc.
Information storage and retrieval systems / Handbooks, manuals, etc.
- Subject
- ISIS (Information retrieval system) / Handbooks, manuals, etc.
Information storage and retrieval systems / Handbooks, manuals, etc.
Information retrieval / Use of / On-line computers
-
Na, S.-H.; Kang, I.-S.; Lee, J.-H.: Parsimonious translation models for information retrieval (2007)
0.05
0.05104009 = product of:
0.15312026 = sum of:
0.031095734 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 898) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031095734 = score(doc=898,freq=6.0), product of:
0.10743652 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.28943354 = fieldWeight in 898, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=898)
0.00959583 = weight(_text_:of in 898) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00959583 = score(doc=898,freq=8.0), product of:
0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.17277241 = fieldWeight in 898, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=898)
0.1124287 = weight(_text_:compact in 898) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1124287 = score(doc=898,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26885647 = queryWeight, product of:
7.5697527 = idf(docFreq=61, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.4181737 = fieldWeight in 898, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.5697527 = idf(docFreq=61, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=898)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Abstract
- In the KL divergence framework, the extended language modeling approach has a critical problem of estimating a query model, which is the probabilistic model that encodes the user's information need. For query expansion in initial retrieval, the translation model had been proposed to involve term co-occurrence statistics. However, the translation model was difficult to apply, because the term co-occurrence statistics must be constructed in the offline time. Especially in a large collection, constructing such a large matrix of term co-occurrences statistics prohibitively increases time and space complexity. In addition, reliable retrieval performance cannot be guaranteed because the translation model may comprise noisy non-topical terms in documents. To resolve these problems, this paper investigates an effective method to construct co-occurrence statistics and eliminate noisy terms by employing a parsimonious translation model. The parsimonious translation model is a compact version of a translation model that can reduce the number of terms containing non-zero probabilities by eliminating non-topical terms in documents. Through experimentation on seven different test collections, we show that the query model estimated from the parsimonious translation model significantly outperforms not only the baseline language modeling, but also the non-parsimonious models.
-
Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: ¬A measure for the cohesion of weighted networks (2003)
0.05
0.049802683 = product of:
0.14940804 = sum of:
0.018397098 = weight(_text_:use in 5157) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018397098 = score(doc=5157,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10875683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.1691581 = fieldWeight in 5157, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5157)
0.018582245 = weight(_text_:of in 5157) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018582245 = score(doc=5157,freq=30.0), product of:
0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.33457235 = fieldWeight in 5157, product of:
5.477226 = tf(freq=30.0), with freq of:
30.0 = termFreq=30.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5157)
0.1124287 = weight(_text_:compact in 5157) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1124287 = score(doc=5157,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26885647 = queryWeight, product of:
7.5697527 = idf(docFreq=61, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.4181737 = fieldWeight in 5157, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.5697527 = idf(docFreq=61, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5157)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Abstract
- Measurement of the degree of interconnectedness in graph like networks of hyperlinks or citations can indicate the existence of research fields and assist in comparative evaluation of research efforts. In this issue we begin with Egghe and Rousseau who review compactness measures and investigate the compactness of a network as a weighted graph with dissimilarity values characterizing the arcs between nodes. They make use of a generalization of the Botofogo, Rivlin, Shneiderman, (BRS) compaction measure which treats the distance between unreachable nodes not as infinity but rather as the number of nodes in the network. The dissimilarity values are determined by summing the reciprocals of the weights of the arcs in the shortest chain between two nodes where no weight is smaller than one. The BRS measure is then the maximum value for the sum of the dissimilarity measures less the actual sum divided by the difference between the maximum and minimum. The Wiener index, the sum of all elements in the dissimilarity matrix divided by two, is then computed for Small's particle physics co-citation data as well as the BRS measure, the dissimilarity values and shortest paths. The compactness measure for the weighted network is smaller than for the un-weighted. When the bibliographic coupling network is utilized it is shown to be less compact than the co-citation network which indicates that the new measure produces results that confirm to an obvious case.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.3, S.193-202
-
Dominich, S.; Kiezer, T.: ¬A measure theoretic approach to information retrieval (2007)
0.05
0.049733497 = product of:
0.14920048 = sum of:
0.04541822 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04541822 = score(doc=445,freq=20.0), product of:
0.10743652 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.42274472 = fieldWeight in 445, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=445)
0.013839302 = weight(_text_:of in 445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013839302 = score(doc=445,freq=26.0), product of:
0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.2491759 = fieldWeight in 445, product of:
5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
26.0 = termFreq=26.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=445)
0.08994296 = weight(_text_:compact in 445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08994296 = score(doc=445,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26885647 = queryWeight, product of:
7.5697527 = idf(docFreq=61, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.33453897 = fieldWeight in 445, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.5697527 = idf(docFreq=61, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=445)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Abstract
- The vector space model of information retrieval is one of the classical and widely applied retrieval models. Paradoxically, it has been characterized by a discrepancy between its formal framework and implementable form. The underlying concepts of the vector space model are mathematical terms: linear space, vector, and inner product. However, in the vector space model, the mathematical meaning of these concepts is not preserved. They are used as mere computational constructs or metaphors. Thus, the vector space model actually does not follow formally from the mathematical concepts on which it has been claimed to rest. This problem has been recognized for more than two decades, but no proper solution has emerged so far. The present article proposes a solution to this problem. First, the concept of retrieval is defined based on the mathematical measure theory. Then, retrieval is particularized using fuzzy set theory. As a result, the retrieval function is conceived as the cardinality of the intersection of two fuzzy sets. This view makes it possible to build a connection to linear spaces. It is shown that the classical and the generalized vector space models, as well as the latent semantic indexing model, gain a correct formal background with which they are consistent. At the same time it becomes clear that the inner product is not a necessary ingredient of the vector space model, and hence of Information Retrieval (IR). The Principle of Object Invariance is introduced to handle this situation. Moreover, this view makes it possible to consistently formulate new retrieval methods: in linear space with general basis, entropy-based, and probability-based. It is also shown that Information Retrieval may be viewed as integral calculus, and thus it gains a very compact and elegant mathematical way of writing. Also, Information Retrieval may thus be conceived as an application of mathematical measure theory.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 58(2007) no.8, S.1108-1122
-
Hoeber, O.; Yang, X.D.: HotMap : supporting visual exploration of Web search results (2009)
0.05
0.049000766 = product of:
0.1470023 = sum of:
0.01795313 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2700) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01795313 = score(doc=2700,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10743652 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 2700, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2700)
0.016620465 = weight(_text_:of in 2700) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016620465 = score(doc=2700,freq=24.0), product of:
0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.2992506 = fieldWeight in 2700, product of:
4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
24.0 = termFreq=24.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2700)
0.1124287 = weight(_text_:compact in 2700) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1124287 = score(doc=2700,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26885647 = queryWeight, product of:
7.5697527 = idf(docFreq=61, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.4181737 = fieldWeight in 2700, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.5697527 = idf(docFreq=61, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2700)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Abstract
- Although information retrieval techniques used by Web search engines have improved substantially over the years, the results of Web searches have continued to be represented in simple list-based formats. Although the list-based representation makes it easy to evaluate a single document for relevance, it does not support the users in the broader tasks of manipulating or exploring the search results as they attempt to find a collection of relevant documents. HotMap is a meta-search system that provides a compact visual representation of Web search results at two levels of detail, and it supports interactive exploration via nested sorting of Web search results based on query term frequencies. An evaluation of the search results for a set of vague queries has shown that the re-sorted search results can provide a higher portion of relevant documents among the top search results. User studies show an increase in speed and effectiveness and a reduction in missed documents when comparing HotMap to the list-based representation used by Google. Subjective measures were positive, and users showed a preference for the HotMap interface. These results provide evidence for the utility of next-generation Web search results interfaces that promote interactive search results exploration.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.1, S.90-110
-
Thornley, C.; Gibb, F.: Meaning in philosophy and meaning in information retrieval (IR) (2009)
0.05
0.048816137 = product of:
0.10983631 = sum of:
0.025389558 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2682) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025389558 = score(doc=2682,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10743652 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.23632148 = fieldWeight in 2682, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2682)
0.031864714 = weight(_text_:use in 2682) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031864714 = score(doc=2682,freq=6.0), product of:
0.10875683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.29299045 = fieldWeight in 2682, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2682)
0.020355828 = weight(_text_:of in 2682) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020355828 = score(doc=2682,freq=36.0), product of:
0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.36650562 = fieldWeight in 2682, product of:
6.0 = tf(freq=36.0), with freq of:
36.0 = termFreq=36.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2682)
0.032226212 = product of:
0.048339315 = sum of:
0.02427886 = weight(_text_:29 in 2682) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02427886 = score(doc=2682,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12493842 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 2682, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2682)
0.024060456 = weight(_text_:22 in 2682) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024060456 = score(doc=2682,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1243752 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2682, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2682)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.44444445 = coord(4/9)
- Abstract
- Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to explore the question of whether the differences between meaning in philosophy and meaning in information retrieval (IR) have implications for the use of philosophy in supporting research in IR. Design/methodology/approach - The approach takes the form of a conceptual analysis and literature review. Findings - There are some differences in the role of meaning in terms of purpose, content and use which should be clarified in order to assist a productive relationship between the philosophy of language and IR. Research limitations/implications - This provides some new theoretical insights into the philosophical context of IR. It suggests that further productive work on the central concepts within IR could be achieved through the use of a methodology which analyses how exactly these concepts are discussed in other disciplines and the implications of any differences in the way in which they may operate in IR. Originality/value - The paper suggests a new perspective on the relationship between philosophy and IR by exploring the role of meaning in these respective disciplines and highlighting differences, as well as similarities, with particular reference to the role of information as well as meaning in IR. This contributes to an understanding of two of the central concepts in IR, meaning and information, and the ways in which they are related. There is a history of work in IR and information science (IS) examining dilemmas and the paper builds on this work by relating it to some similar dilemmas in philosophy. Thus it develops the theory and conceptual understanding of IR by suggesting that philosophy could be used as a way of exploring intractable dilemmas in IR.
- Date
- 23. 2.2009 17:22:29
- Source
- Journal of documentation. 65(2009) no.1, S.133-150
-
Losada, D.E.; Barreiro, A.: Emebedding term similarity and inverse document frequency into a logical model of information retrieval (2003)
0.05
0.048527256 = product of:
0.10918632 = sum of:
0.049753174 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049753174 = score(doc=1422,freq=6.0), product of:
0.10743652 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.46309367 = fieldWeight in 1422, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1422)
0.029435357 = weight(_text_:use in 1422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029435357 = score(doc=1422,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10875683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.27065295 = fieldWeight in 1422, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1422)
0.017165542 = weight(_text_:of in 1422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017165542 = score(doc=1422,freq=10.0), product of:
0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.3090647 = fieldWeight in 1422, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1422)
0.012832243 = product of:
0.03849673 = sum of:
0.03849673 = weight(_text_:22 in 1422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03849673 = score(doc=1422,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1243752 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1422, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1422)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.44444445 = coord(4/9)
- Abstract
- We propose a novel approach to incorporate term similarity and inverse document frequency into a logical model of information retrieval. The ability of the logic to handle expressive representations along with the use of such classical notions are promising characteristics for IR systems. The approach proposed here has been efficiently implemented and experiments against test collections are presented.
- Date
- 22. 3.2003 19:27:23
- Footnote
- Beitrag eines Themenheftes: Mathematical, logical, and formal methods in information retrieval
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.4, S.285-301
-
Ferris, A.M.: If you buy it, will they use it? : a case study on the use of Classification web (2006)
0.05
0.048433103 = product of:
0.10897448 = sum of:
0.02513438 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 88) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02513438 = score(doc=88,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10743652 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 88, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=88)
0.057592034 = weight(_text_:use in 88) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057592034 = score(doc=88,freq=10.0), product of:
0.10875683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.52954865 = fieldWeight in 88, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=88)
0.01501985 = weight(_text_:of in 88) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01501985 = score(doc=88,freq=10.0), product of:
0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.2704316 = fieldWeight in 88, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=88)
0.011228213 = product of:
0.033684637 = sum of:
0.033684637 = weight(_text_:22 in 88) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033684637 = score(doc=88,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1243752 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 88, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=88)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.44444445 = coord(4/9)
- Abstract
- This paper presents a study conducted at the University of Colorado at Boulder (CU-Boulder) to assess the extent to which its catalogers were using Classification Web (Class Web), the subscription-based, online cataloging documentation resource provided by the Library of Congress. In addition, this paper will explore assumptions made by management regarding CU-Boulder catalogers' use of the product, possible reasons for the lower-than-expected use, and recommendations for promoting a more efficient and cost-effective use of Class Web at other institutions similar to CU-Boulder.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
- Theme
- Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
-
Park, E.-K.; Ra, D.-Y.; Jang, M.-G.: Techniques for improving web retrieval effectiveness (2005)
0.05
0.04794797 = product of:
0.10788293 = sum of:
0.056999415 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1060) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056999415 = score(doc=1060,freq=14.0), product of:
0.10743652 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.5305404 = fieldWeight in 1060, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1060)
0.022076517 = weight(_text_:use in 1060) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022076517 = score(doc=1060,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10875683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.20298971 = fieldWeight in 1060, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1060)
0.01909546 = weight(_text_:of in 1060) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01909546 = score(doc=1060,freq=22.0), product of:
0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.34381276 = fieldWeight in 1060, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1060)
0.009711544 = product of:
0.029134631 = sum of:
0.029134631 = weight(_text_:29 in 1060) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029134631 = score(doc=1060,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12493842 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1060, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1060)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.44444445 = coord(4/9)
- Abstract
- This paper talks about several schemes for improving retrieval effectiveness that can be used in the named page finding tasks of web information retrieval (Overview of the TREC-2002 web track. In: Proceedings of the Eleventh Text Retrieval Conference TREC-2002, NIST Special Publication #500-251, 2003). These methods were applied on top of the basic information retrieval model as additional mechanisms to upgrade the system. Use of the title of web pages was found to be effective. It was confirmed that anchor texts of incoming links was beneficial as suggested in other works. Sentence-query similarity is a new type of information proposed by us and was identified to be the best information to take advantage of. Stratifying and re-ranking the retrieval list based on the maximum count of index terms in common between a sentence and a query resulted in significant improvement of performance. To demonstrate these facts a large-scale web information retrieval system was developed and used for experimentation.
- Date
- 26.12.2007 20:28:29
-
Koch, T.: ¬Az internetforrasok toketesebb leirasahoz, szervezesehez es keresesehez alkalmas oszatlyozasi rendszerek hasznalata (2000)
0.05
0.04553641 = product of:
0.10245692 = sum of:
0.03590626 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3210) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03590626 = score(doc=3210,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10743652 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 3210, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3210)
0.036794197 = weight(_text_:use in 3210) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036794197 = score(doc=3210,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10875683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.3383162 = fieldWeight in 3210, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3210)
0.013570553 = weight(_text_:of in 3210) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013570553 = score(doc=3210,freq=4.0), product of:
0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.24433708 = fieldWeight in 3210, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3210)
0.016185908 = product of:
0.04855772 = sum of:
0.04855772 = weight(_text_:29 in 3210) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04855772 = score(doc=3210,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12493842 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 3210, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3210)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.44444445 = coord(4/9)
- Date
- 3. 3.1999 20:29:09
- Footnote
- Übers. d. Titels: The use of improved classification systems for the description management and searching of Internet sources
- Theme
- Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
-
Wolfram, D.: Applied informetrics for information retrieval research (2003)
0.05
0.045022488 = product of:
0.13506746 = sum of:
0.07462976 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07462976 = score(doc=4589,freq=6.0), product of:
0.10743652 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.6946405 = fieldWeight in 4589, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4589)
0.044153035 = weight(_text_:use in 4589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044153035 = score(doc=4589,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10875683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.40597942 = fieldWeight in 4589, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4589)
0.016284661 = weight(_text_:of in 4589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016284661 = score(doc=4589,freq=4.0), product of:
0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.2932045 = fieldWeight in 4589, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4589)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Abstract
- The author demonstrates how informetric analysis of information retrieval system content and use provides valuable insights that have applications for the modelling, design, and evaluation of information retrieval systems.
-
Crestani, F.; Dominich, S.; Lalmas, M.; Rijsbergen, C.J.K. van: Mathematical, logical, and formal methods in information retrieval : an introduction to the special issue (2003)
0.04
0.044780698 = product of:
0.10075657 = sum of:
0.052771207 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1451) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052771207 = score(doc=1451,freq=12.0), product of:
0.10743652 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.49118498 = fieldWeight in 1451, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1451)
0.022076517 = weight(_text_:use in 1451) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022076517 = score(doc=1451,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10875683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.20298971 = fieldWeight in 1451, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1451)
0.016284661 = weight(_text_:of in 1451) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016284661 = score(doc=1451,freq=16.0), product of:
0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.2932045 = fieldWeight in 1451, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1451)
0.009624182 = product of:
0.028872546 = sum of:
0.028872546 = weight(_text_:22 in 1451) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028872546 = score(doc=1451,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1243752 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1451, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1451)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.44444445 = coord(4/9)
- Abstract
- Research an the use of mathematical, logical, and formal methods, has been central to Information Retrieval research for a long time. Research in this area is important not only because it helps enhancing retrieval effectiveness, but also because it helps clarifying the underlying concepts of Information Retrieval. In this article we outline some of the major aspects of the subject, and summarize the papers of this special issue with respect to how they relate to these aspects. We conclude by highlighting some directions of future research, which are needed to better understand the formal characteristics of Information Retrieval.
- Date
- 22. 3.2003 19:27:36
- Footnote
- Einführung zu den Beiträgen eines Themenheftes: Mathematical, logical, and formal methods in information retrieval
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.4, S.281-284
-
Lim, E.: Southeast Asian subject gateways : an examination of their classification practices (2000)
0.04
0.043981805 = product of:
0.13194542 = sum of:
0.043087512 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043087512 = score(doc=6040,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10743652 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 6040, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6040)
0.011514995 = weight(_text_:of in 6040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011514995 = score(doc=6040,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.20732689 = fieldWeight in 6040, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6040)
0.077342905 = product of:
0.116014354 = sum of:
0.058269262 = weight(_text_:29 in 6040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058269262 = score(doc=6040,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12493842 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 6040, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6040)
0.05774509 = weight(_text_:22 in 6040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05774509 = score(doc=6040,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1243752 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6040, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6040)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Date
- 22. 6.2002 19:42:47
- Source
- International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 29(2000) no.3, S.45-48
- Theme
- Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
