Search (1352 results, page 1 of 68)

  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.22 
    0.21671271 = product of:
  0.2889503 = sum of:
    0.06789383 = product of:
      0.2036815 = sum of:
        0.2036815 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2036815 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.36241096 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042747166 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.2036815 = weight(_text_:2f in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2036815 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.36241096 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042747166 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.017374953 = product of:
      0.034749907 = sum of:
        0.034749907 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034749907 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1496933 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042747166 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.75 = coord(3/4)
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  2. Schrodt, R.: Tiefen und Untiefen im wissenschaftlichen Sprachgebrauch (2008) 0.18 
    0.18105023 = product of:
  0.36210045 = sum of:
    0.09052511 = product of:
      0.27157533 = sum of:
        0.27157533 = weight(_text_:3a in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.27157533 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.36241096 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042747166 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.27157533 = weight(_text_:2f in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.27157533 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.36241096 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042747166 = queryNorm
        0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Content
    Vgl. auch: https://studylibde.com/doc/13053640/richard-schrodt. Vgl. auch: http%3A%2F%2Fwww.univie.ac.at%2FGermanistik%2Fschrodt%2Fvorlesung%2Fwissenschaftssprache.doc&usg=AOvVaw1lDLDR6NFf1W0-oC9mEUJf.
  3. Vetere, G.; Lenzerini, M.: Models for semantic interoperability in service-oriented architectures (2005) 0.16 
    0.15841895 = product of:
  0.3168379 = sum of:
    0.07920948 = product of:
      0.23762843 = sum of:
        0.23762843 = weight(_text_:3a in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.23762843 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.36241096 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042747166 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.23762843 = weight(_text_:2f in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.23762843 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.36241096 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042747166 = queryNorm
        0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Content
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5386707&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D5386707.
  4. Mas, S.; Marleau, Y.: Proposition of a faceted classification model to support corporate information organization and digital records management (2009) 0.14 
    0.13578767 = product of:
  0.27157533 = sum of:
    0.06789383 = product of:
      0.2036815 = sum of:
        0.2036815 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2036815 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.36241096 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042747166 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.2036815 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2036815 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.36241096 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042747166 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?reload=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4755313%2F4755314%2F04755480.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4755480&authDecision=-203.
  5. Donsbach, W.: Wahrheit in den Medien : über den Sinn eines methodischen Objektivitätsbegriffes (2001) 0.11 
    0.11315639 = product of:
  0.22631279 = sum of:
    0.056578197 = product of:
      0.16973458 = sum of:
        0.16973458 = weight(_text_:3a in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16973458 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.36241096 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042747166 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.16973458 = weight(_text_:2f in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.16973458 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.36241096 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042747166 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Source
    Politische Meinung. 381(2001) Nr.1, S.65-74 [https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dgfe.de%2Ffileadmin%2FOrdnerRedakteure%2FSektionen%2FSek02_AEW%2FKWF%2FPublikationen_Reihe_1989-2003%2FBand_17%2FBd_17_1994_355-406_A.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2KcbRsHy5UQ9QRIUyuOLNi]
  6. Stojanovic, N.: Ontology-based Information Retrieval : methods and tools for cooperative query answering (2005) 0.09 
    0.09052511 = product of:
  0.18105023 = sum of:
    0.045262557 = product of:
      0.13578767 = sum of:
        0.13578767 = weight(_text_:3a in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13578767 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.36241096 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042747166 = queryNorm
            0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.13578767 = weight(_text_:2f in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13578767 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.36241096 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042747166 = queryNorm
        0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F1627&ei=tAtYUYrBNoHKtQb3l4GYBw&usg=AFQjCNHeaxKkKU3-u54LWxMNYGXaaDLCGw&sig2=8WykXWQoDKjDSdGtAakH2Q&bvm=bv.44442042,d.Yms.
  7. Bothmann, R.: Cataloging electronic books (2004) 0.04 
    0.039247107 = product of:
  0.15698843 = sum of:
    0.15698843 = sum of:
      0.116446875 = weight(_text_:instruction in 129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.116446875 = score(doc=129,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.25369743 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.934836 = idf(docFreq=317, maxDocs=44218)
            0.042747166 = queryNorm
          0.45899904 = fieldWeight in 129, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.934836 = idf(docFreq=317, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=129)
      0.040541556 = weight(_text_:22 in 129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.040541556 = score(doc=129,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1496933 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.042747166 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 129, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=129)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Papers on the cataloging of electronic resources have focused on electronic journals and Internet resources such as Web sites and not on electronic books. Electronic books are nonserial monographic resources accessed with a computer either directly or remotely. Rules and standards for cataloging electronic resources have changed and continue to change. This article discusses the electronic book as a unique manifestation and provides practical instruction on the application of current cataloging rules. The cataloging elements covered are control fields and variable data fields, including classification, uniform titles, title information, edition information, type and extent of the resource, publication and distribution information, physical description, series statements, notes, and subject analysis.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  8. Haycock, L.A.: Citation analysis of education dissertations for collection development (2004) 0.03 
    0.033640377 = product of:
  0.13456151 = sum of:
    0.13456151 = sum of:
      0.099811606 = weight(_text_:instruction in 135) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.099811606 = score(doc=135,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.25369743 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.934836 = idf(docFreq=317, maxDocs=44218)
            0.042747166 = queryNorm
          0.39342776 = fieldWeight in 135, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.934836 = idf(docFreq=317, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=135)
      0.034749907 = weight(_text_:22 in 135) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.034749907 = score(doc=135,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1496933 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.042747166 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 135, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=135)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    The reference lists of forty-three education dissertations on curriculum and instruction completed at the University of Minnesota during the calendar years 2000-2002 were analyzed to inform collection development. As one measure of use of the academic library collection, the citation analysis yielded data to guide journal selection, retention, and cancellation decisions. The project aimed to ensure that the most frequently cited journals were retained on subscription. The serial monograph ratio for citation also was evaluated in comparison with other studies and explored in the context of funding ratios. Results of citation studies can provide a basis for liaison conversations with faculty in addition to guiding selection decisions. This research project can serve as a model for similar projects in other libraries that look at literature in education as well as other fields.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  9. Colaric, S.M.: Instruction for Web searching : An empirical study (2003) 0.03 
    0.033270538 = product of:
  0.13308215 = sum of:
    0.13308215 = product of:
      0.2661643 = sum of:
        0.2661643 = weight(_text_:instruction in 6333) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2661643 = score(doc=6333,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25369743 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.934836 = idf(docFreq=317, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042747166 = queryNorm
            1.0491407 = fieldWeight in 6333, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.934836 = idf(docFreq=317, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6333)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  10. Thomas, N.P.: Information literacy and information : skills instruction applying research to practice in the school library media center (2004) 0.03 
    0.029407276 = product of:
  0.1176291 = sum of:
    0.1176291 = product of:
      0.2352582 = sum of:
        0.2352582 = weight(_text_:instruction in 3462) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2352582 = score(doc=3462,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.25369743 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.934836 = idf(docFreq=317, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042747166 = queryNorm
            0.9273181 = fieldWeight in 3462, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.934836 = idf(docFreq=317, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3462)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    In this new edition the author updates and expands an her reviews of the literature conceming learning styles, information skills, literacy skills, technological literacy, and bibliographic instruction.
  11. ¬The digital university : building a learning community (2002) 0.03 
    0.029317472 = product of:
  0.11726989 = sum of:
    0.11726989 = sum of:
      0.094103284 = weight(_text_:instruction in 1782) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.094103284 = score(doc=1782,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.25369743 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.934836 = idf(docFreq=317, maxDocs=44218)
            0.042747166 = queryNorm
          0.37092724 = fieldWeight in 1782, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            5.934836 = idf(docFreq=317, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1782)
      0.023166604 = weight(_text_:22 in 1782) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.023166604 = score(doc=1782,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1496933 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.042747166 = queryNorm
          0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1782, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1782)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    22. 3.2008 14:43:03
    LCSH
    Computer / assisted instruction / Great Britain
    Subject
    Computer / assisted instruction / Great Britain
  12. Hsieh-Yee, I.: Cataloging and metatdata education in North American LIS programs (2004) 0.03 
    0.02803365 = product of:
  0.1121346 = sum of:
    0.1121346 = sum of:
      0.083176345 = weight(_text_:instruction in 138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.083176345 = score(doc=138,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.25369743 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.934836 = idf(docFreq=317, maxDocs=44218)
            0.042747166 = queryNorm
          0.32785648 = fieldWeight in 138, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.934836 = idf(docFreq=317, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=138)
      0.028958255 = weight(_text_:22 in 138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.028958255 = score(doc=138,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1496933 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.042747166 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 138, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=138)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    This paper presents findings of a survey an the state of cataloging and metadata education. in ALA-accredited library and information science progranis in North America. The survey was conducted in response to Action Item 5.1 of the "Bibliographic Control of Web Resources: A Library of Congress Action Plan," which focuses an providing metadata education to new LIS professionals. The study found LIS programs increased their reliance an introductory courses to cover cataloging and metadata, but fewer programs than before had a cataloging course requirement. The knowledge of cataloging delivered in introductory courses was basic, and the coverage of metadata was limited to an overview. Cataloging courses showed similarity in coverage and practice and focused an print mater!als. Few cataloging educators provided exercises in metadata record creation using non-AACR standards. Advanced cataloging courses provided in-depth coverage of subject cataloging and the cataloging of nonbook resources, but offered very limited coverage of metadata. Few programs offered full courses an metadata, and even fewer offered advanced metadata courses. Metadata topics were well integrated into LIS curricula, but coverage of metadata courses varied from program to program, depending an the interests of instructors. Educators were forward-looking and agreed an the inclusion of specific knowledge and skills in metadata instruction. A series of actions were proposed to assist educators in providing students with competencies in cataloging and metadata.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  13. Pinto, M.; Sales, D.: INFOLITRANS: a model for the development of information competence for translators (2008) 0.03 
    0.02803365 = product of:
  0.1121346 = sum of:
    0.1121346 = sum of:
      0.083176345 = weight(_text_:instruction in 1897) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.083176345 = score(doc=1897,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.25369743 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.934836 = idf(docFreq=317, maxDocs=44218)
            0.042747166 = queryNorm
          0.32785648 = fieldWeight in 1897, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.934836 = idf(docFreq=317, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1897)
      0.028958255 = weight(_text_:22 in 1897) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.028958255 = score(doc=1897,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1496933 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.042747166 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1897, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1897)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Purpose - Since every community of practice generates, seeks, retrieves and uses information resources and sources related to the cognitive structure being researched or studied and the tasks being performed, the need arises to undertake studies focused on real user communities, which in the case of this paper is the group of translators. This paper aims to investigate this issue. Design/methodology/approach - In this arena of application, it is important to remember that translators are not only information users, but also information processors and producers. Thus, their documentary competence has to evolve in three dimensions: the informational, the methodological and the strategic. The conceptual model proposed in the paper is based on information literacy (INFOLIT) standards and also the authors' knowledge of translation practice and the competencies it demands, where INFOLIT plays a starring role. This paper is part of a broader research currently in progress, whose main goal is to provide translators and interpreters with a solid instruction in information literacy. Findings - The paper introduces a model for information literacy specifically intended to develop the information competence of this community of users, it reveals that the model is a gathering of skills, competences, knowledge and values, and it is based on the cooperation between the authors' expert knowledge of information science and professional translation practice. Originality/value - This paper puts forward the first proposal for information literacy applied to translation training.
    Date
    7. 6.2008 16:18:22
  14. Shoham, S.: Cataloging instruction in Israel (2005) 0.03 
    0.027898192 = product of:
  0.11159277 = sum of:
    0.11159277 = product of:
      0.22318554 = sum of:
        0.22318554 = weight(_text_:instruction in 5762) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22318554 = score(doc=5762,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.25369743 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.934836 = idf(docFreq=317, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042747166 = queryNorm
            0.8797312 = fieldWeight in 5762, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              5.934836 = idf(docFreq=317, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5762)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Despite its young age compared to similar programs in the United States, cataloging instruction in Israel has also been transformed to reflect the changes in the work done in libraries based on technological innovations and conceptions held by those involved in academia. Cataloging instruction in Israel is marked by a number of factors: * There has always been a division, carried through to today, between distinct and independent courses on various aspects of cataloging: A course on classification, a course on descriptive cataloging and a course on indexing. Even today, these courses are requirements in all of the instructional frameworks, though the length of the course has been reduced over the years * Over the years additional courses have been introduced as a reflection of the technological developments and work in the field * The majority of courses are now taught in computer labs * Switch to instruction by academics and not by librarians, workers in the field, as was customary for many decades * Focus of instruction in university departments on theory and understanding of concepts.
  15. Hutchins, E.O.; Fister, B.; MacPherson, K.H.: Changing landscapes, enduring values : making the transition from bibliographic instruction to information literacy (2002) 0.03 
    0.025211489 = product of:
  0.100845955 = sum of:
    0.100845955 = product of:
      0.20169191 = sum of:
        0.20169191 = weight(_text_:instruction in 1899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20169191 = score(doc=1899,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.25369743 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.934836 = idf(docFreq=317, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042747166 = queryNorm
            0.7950097 = fieldWeight in 1899, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              5.934836 = idf(docFreq=317, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1899)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Two liberal arts colleges in Minnesota are building an their longstanding commitment to bibliographic instruction to develop innovative information literacy programs. This article explores assumptions shared by the Earlham model of bibliographic instruction and the information literacy movement, outlines important differences, examines conditions that inhibit change, and profiles two approaches to developing information literacy programs with strong cross-campus collaboration.
  16. McIlwaine, J.: Bibliographical control : self-instruction from individualised investigations (2000) 0.02 
    0.024952902 = product of:
  0.099811606 = sum of:
    0.099811606 = product of:
      0.19962321 = sum of:
        0.19962321 = weight(_text_:instruction in 5410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19962321 = score(doc=5410,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25369743 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.934836 = idf(docFreq=317, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042747166 = queryNorm
            0.7868555 = fieldWeight in 5410, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.934836 = idf(docFreq=317, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5410)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  17. Ferguson, B.: MARC/AACR2/authority control tagging : a blitz cataloging workbook (2005) 0.02 
    0.024952902 = product of:
  0.099811606 = sum of:
    0.099811606 = product of:
      0.19962321 = sum of:
        0.19962321 = weight(_text_:instruction in 4602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19962321 = score(doc=4602,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25369743 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.934836 = idf(docFreq=317, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042747166 = queryNorm
            0.7868555 = fieldWeight in 4602, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.934836 = idf(docFreq=317, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4602)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Designed for simple instruction and practice, this workbook helps present and reinforce basic rules for cataloguing in an online environment.
  18. Halttunen, K.; Järvelin, K.: Assessing learning outcomes in two information retrieval learning environments (2005) 0.02 
    0.024952902 = product of:
  0.099811606 = sum of:
    0.099811606 = product of:
      0.19962321 = sum of:
        0.19962321 = weight(_text_:instruction in 996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19962321 = score(doc=996,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.25369743 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.934836 = idf(docFreq=317, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042747166 = queryNorm
            0.7868555 = fieldWeight in 996, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              5.934836 = idf(docFreq=317, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=996)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    In order to design information retrieval (IR) learning environments and instruction, it is important to explore learning outcomes of different pedagogical solutions. Learning outcomes have seldom been evaluated in IR instruction. The particular focus of this study is the assessment of learning outcomes in an experimental, but naturalistic, learning environment compared to more traditional instruction. The 57 participants of an introductory course on IR were selected for this study, and the analysis illustrates their learning outcomes regarding both conceptual change and development of IR skill. Concept mapping of student essays was used to analyze conceptual change and log-files of search exercises provided data for performance assessment. Students in the experimental learning environment changed their conceptions more regarding linguistic aspects of IR and paid more emphasis on planning and management of search process. Performance assessment indicates that anchored instruction and scaffolding with an instructional tool, the IR Game, with performance feedback enables students to construct queries with fewer semantic knowledge errors also in operational IR systems.
  19. Rader, H.B.: Information literacy 1973-2002 : a selected literature review (2002) 0.02 
    0.023248494 = product of:
  0.092993975 = sum of:
    0.092993975 = product of:
      0.18598795 = sum of:
        0.18598795 = weight(_text_:instruction in 43) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18598795 = score(doc=43,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.25369743 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.934836 = idf(docFreq=317, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042747166 = queryNorm
            0.73310935 = fieldWeight in 43, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              5.934836 = idf(docFreq=317, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=43)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    More than 5000 publications related to library user instruction and information literacy have been published and reviewed in the past thirty years. New developments in education and technology during the last two decades have affected user instruction and have led to the emergence of information literacy. Based on needs related to the rapid development of information technology and the evolving information society, librarians have begun teaching information skills to all types of users to ensure that they gain information fluency so they can become productive and effective information users both in the education environment and in the work environment. The number of publications related to user instruction and information literacy, like the field itself, show phenomenal growth during the past three decades as demonstrated by the fact that in 1973 twenty-eight publications were reviewed, and in 2002 more than 300 publications dealing with the topic of information literacy will be issued. It is noteworthy that in the last decade there has been a tremendous growth in publications related to information literacy globally. During the 1970s, publications indicate that user instruction activities were of concern primarily to librarians in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, Australia, and New Zealand. At the present time, publications indicate a major concern with information literacy not only in the countries mentioned above but also in China, Germany, Mexico, Scandinavia, Singapore, South Africa, South America, Spain, and others. On an annual hasis, the majority of the publications have addressed information literacy in academic libraries (60 percent) followed by publications related to information literacy instruction in school media centers (20 percent).
  20. Dean, R.J.: FAST: development of simplified headings for metadata (2004) 0.02 
    0.023168746 = product of:
  0.092674986 = sum of:
    0.092674986 = product of:
      0.27802494 = sum of:
        0.27802494 = weight(_text_:lcsh's in 5682) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.27802494 = score(doc=5682,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.42341614 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042747166 = queryNorm
            0.65662336 = fieldWeight in 5682, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5682)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    The Library of Congress Subject Headings schema (LCSH) is the most commonly used and widely accepted subject vocabulary for general application. It is the de facto universal controlled vocabulary and has been a model for developing subject heading systems by many countries. However, LCSH's complex syntax and rules for constructing headings restrict its application by requiring highly skilled personnel and limit the effectiveness of automated authority control. Recent trends, driven to a large extent by the rapid growth of the Web, are forcing changes in bibliographic control systems to make them easier to use, understand, and apply, and subject headings are no exception. The purpose of adapting the LCSH with a simplified syntax to create FAST (Faceted Application of Subject Terminology) headings is to retain the very rich vocabulary of LCSH while making the schema easier to understand, control, apply, and use. The schema maintains compatibility with LCSH--any valid Library of Congress subject heading can be converted to FAST headings.

Authors

Languages

Types

  • a 1127
  • m 158
  • el 64
  • s 51
  • b 31
  • x 13
  • i 8
  • n 2
  • p 1
  • r 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications