-
Mas, S.; Marleau, Y.: Proposition of a faceted classification model to support corporate information organization and digital records management (2009)
0.24
0.24347489 = product of:
0.32463318 = sum of:
0.07488133 = product of:
0.22464398 = sum of:
0.22464398 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.22464398 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
0.39970955 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.22464398 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.22464398 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
0.39970955 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
0.025107846 = product of:
0.05021569 = sum of:
0.05021569 = weight(_text_:management in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05021569 = score(doc=2918,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15891297 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.31599492 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.75 = coord(3/4)
- Abstract
- The employees of an organization often use a personal hierarchical classification scheme to organize digital documents that are stored on their own workstations. As this may make it hard for other employees to retrieve these documents, there is a risk that the organization will lose track of needed documentation. Furthermore, the inherent boundaries of such a hierarchical structure require making arbitrary decisions about which specific criteria the classification will b.e based on (for instance, the administrative activity or the document type, although a document can have several attributes and require classification in several classes).A faceted classification model to support corporate information organization is proposed. Partially based on Ranganathan's facets theory, this model aims not only to standardize the organization of digital documents, but also to simplify the management of a document throughout its life cycle for both individuals and organizations, while ensuring compliance to regulatory and policy requirements.
- Footnote
- Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?reload=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4755313%2F4755314%2F04755480.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4755480&authDecision=-203.
-
Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004)
0.24
0.23901634 = product of:
0.31868845 = sum of:
0.07488133 = product of:
0.22464398 = sum of:
0.22464398 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.22464398 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.39970955 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.22464398 = weight(_text_:2f in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.22464398 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.39970955 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.019163147 = product of:
0.038326293 = sum of:
0.038326293 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038326293 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16509943 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.75 = coord(3/4)
- Content
- Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
- Date
- 8. 1.2013 10:22:32
-
Schrodt, R.: Tiefen und Untiefen im wissenschaftlichen Sprachgebrauch (2008)
0.20
0.19968355 = product of:
0.3993671 = sum of:
0.09984177 = product of:
0.29952532 = sum of:
0.29952532 = weight(_text_:3a in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.29952532 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
0.39970955 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.29952532 = weight(_text_:2f in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.29952532 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
0.39970955 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Content
- Vgl. auch: https://studylibde.com/doc/13053640/richard-schrodt. Vgl. auch: http%3A%2F%2Fwww.univie.ac.at%2FGermanistik%2Fschrodt%2Fvorlesung%2Fwissenschaftssprache.doc&usg=AOvVaw1lDLDR6NFf1W0-oC9mEUJf.
-
Vetere, G.; Lenzerini, M.: Models for semantic interoperability in service-oriented architectures (2005)
0.17
0.17472312 = product of:
0.34944624 = sum of:
0.08736156 = product of:
0.26208466 = sum of:
0.26208466 = weight(_text_:3a in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.26208466 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
0.39970955 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.26208466 = weight(_text_:2f in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.26208466 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
0.39970955 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Content
- Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5386707&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D5386707.
-
Stojanovic, N.: Ontology-based Information Retrieval : methods and tools for cooperative query answering (2005)
0.16
0.16362508 = product of:
0.21816677 = sum of:
0.049920887 = product of:
0.14976266 = sum of:
0.14976266 = weight(_text_:3a in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14976266 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
0.39970955 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.018483229 = weight(_text_:technology in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018483229 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.13162735 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
0.14976266 = weight(_text_:2f in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14976266 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
0.39970955 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
0.75 = coord(3/4)
- Abstract
- By the explosion of possibilities for a ubiquitous content production, the information overload problem reaches the level of complexity which cannot be managed by traditional modelling approaches anymore. Due to their pure syntactical nature traditional information retrieval approaches did not succeed in treating content itself (i.e. its meaning, and not its representation). This leads to a very low usefulness of the results of a retrieval process for a user's task at hand. In the last ten years ontologies have been emerged from an interesting conceptualisation paradigm to a very promising (semantic) modelling technology, especially in the context of the Semantic Web. From the information retrieval point of view, ontologies enable a machine-understandable form of content description, such that the retrieval process can be driven by the meaning of the content. However, the very ambiguous nature of the retrieval process in which a user, due to the unfamiliarity with the underlying repository and/or query syntax, just approximates his information need in a query, implies a necessity to include the user in the retrieval process more actively in order to close the gap between the meaning of the content and the meaning of a user's query (i.e. his information need). This thesis lays foundation for such an ontology-based interactive retrieval process, in which the retrieval system interacts with a user in order to conceptually interpret the meaning of his query, whereas the underlying domain ontology drives the conceptualisation process. In that way the retrieval process evolves from a query evaluation process into a highly interactive cooperation between a user and the retrieval system, in which the system tries to anticipate the user's information need and to deliver the relevant content proactively. Moreover, the notion of content relevance for a user's query evolves from a content dependent artefact to the multidimensional context-dependent structure, strongly influenced by the user's preferences. This cooperation process is realized as the so-called Librarian Agent Query Refinement Process. In order to clarify the impact of an ontology on the retrieval process (regarding its complexity and quality), a set of methods and tools for different levels of content and query formalisation is developed, ranging from pure ontology-based inferencing to keyword-based querying in which semantics automatically emerges from the results. Our evaluation studies have shown that the possibilities to conceptualize a user's information need in the right manner and to interpret the retrieval results accordingly are key issues for realizing much more meaningful information retrieval systems.
- Content
- Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F1627&ei=tAtYUYrBNoHKtQb3l4GYBw&usg=AFQjCNHeaxKkKU3-u54LWxMNYGXaaDLCGw&sig2=8WykXWQoDKjDSdGtAakH2Q&bvm=bv.44442042,d.Yms.
-
Donsbach, W.: Wahrheit in den Medien : über den Sinn eines methodischen Objektivitätsbegriffes (2001)
0.12
0.12480222 = product of:
0.24960443 = sum of:
0.06240111 = product of:
0.18720332 = sum of:
0.18720332 = weight(_text_:3a in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18720332 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
0.39970955 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.18720332 = weight(_text_:2f in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18720332 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
0.39970955 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Politische Meinung. 381(2001) Nr.1, S.65-74 [https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dgfe.de%2Ffileadmin%2FOrdnerRedakteure%2FSektionen%2FSek02_AEW%2FKWF%2FPublikationen_Reihe_1989-2003%2FBand_17%2FBd_17_1994_355-406_A.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2KcbRsHy5UQ9QRIUyuOLNi]
-
Robertson, S.; Tait, J.: In Memoriam Karen Sparck Jones (2007)
0.10
0.101559 = product of:
0.203118 = sum of:
0.055449687 = weight(_text_:technology in 2927) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055449687 = score(doc=2927,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.39488205 = fieldWeight in 2927, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2927)
0.1476683 = sum of:
0.07101571 = weight(_text_:management in 2927) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07101571 = score(doc=2927,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15891297 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.44688427 = fieldWeight in 2927, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2927)
0.07665259 = weight(_text_:22 in 2927) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07665259 = score(doc=2927,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16509943 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2927, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2927)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- This note is also appearing in the Journal of the American Society for Information Systems and Technology.
- Date
- 26.12.2007 14:22:47
- Source
- Information processing and management. 43(2007) no.6, S.1441-1446
-
Wu, I.-L.; Lin, H.-C.: ¬A strategy-based process for implementing knowledge management : an integrative view and empirical study (2009)
0.09
0.085740045 = product of:
0.17148009 = sum of:
0.03920885 = weight(_text_:technology in 2764) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03920885 = score(doc=2764,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.2792238 = fieldWeight in 2764, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2764)
0.13227125 = sum of:
0.09394495 = weight(_text_:management in 2764) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09394495 = score(doc=2764,freq=14.0), product of:
0.15891297 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.59117234 = fieldWeight in 2764, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2764)
0.038326293 = weight(_text_:22 in 2764) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038326293 = score(doc=2764,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16509943 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2764, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2764)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Knowledge resource is unique and valuable for a link to competitive advantage based on the knowledge-based perspective. Effective knowledge management is the major concern of contemporary business managers. The key determinant of effective knowledge management is the firm's competitive strategy. The link between business strategy and knowledge management, while often discussed, has been widely ignored in practice. Moreover, while knowledge management is complex in nature, it is difficult to directly translate a firm's competitive strategy into the specific knowledge management activities. This requires first defining knowledge strategy to guide further information technology (IT)-supported implementation approaches. Finally, the ultimate goal of knowledge management lies in the realization of firm performance. Previous studies have just discussed partial relationship among these relevant knowledge concepts rather than in an integrative manner. Thus, this research proposes a complete process-based model with four components: competitive strategy, knowledge strategy, implementation approach, and firm performance. Empirical results have shown positive relationships between any two consecutive components and useful insight for knowledge implementation practice.
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 19:08:51
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.4, S.789-802
-
AI-Hawamdeh, S.: Designing an interdisciplinary graduate program in knowledge management (2005)
0.07
0.07430701 = product of:
0.14861402 = sum of:
0.023104034 = weight(_text_:technology in 4236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023104034 = score(doc=4236,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.16453418 = fieldWeight in 4236, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4236)
0.12550999 = sum of:
0.09357142 = weight(_text_:management in 4236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09357142 = score(doc=4236,freq=20.0), product of:
0.15891297 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.58882177 = fieldWeight in 4236, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4236)
0.03193858 = weight(_text_:22 in 4236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03193858 = score(doc=4236,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16509943 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4236, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4236)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Designing an interdisciplinary graduate program in knowledge management requires a good understanding of knowledge processes and the ability to differentiate between information management and knowledge management. Given the complexity of knowledge and the nature of its existence, there is a need for graduate programs to go beyond information management and include in the curriculum disciplines that deal with social, cultural, and economic issues such as communication, cognitive science, and business. An understanding of the interdisciplinary nature of knowledge management is necessary for a more balanced and practical approach to the development of a knowledge management curriculum. In this article, the design and development of an interdisciplinary graduate program in knowledge management at Nanyang Technological University in Singapore is reported. The initiation of the program was influenced by the strong demand from the public sector in Singapore for knowledge management professionals. It was developed in close association with the information studies program at Nanyang Technological University. In the first year, the program attracted 230 applicants, of which 45 were selected-22 students came from the public sector and 23 students came from the private sector.
- Footnote
- Teil eines Themenschwerpunktes: Knowledge Management in Asia
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 56(2005) no.11, S.1200-1206
-
Kurth, M.; Ruddy, D.; Rupp, N.: Repurposing MARC metadata : using digital project experience to develop a metadata management design (2004)
0.07
0.07272456 = product of:
0.14544912 = sum of:
0.027724843 = weight(_text_:technology in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027724843 = score(doc=4748,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
0.11772427 = sum of:
0.07939798 = weight(_text_:management in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07939798 = score(doc=4748,freq=10.0), product of:
0.15891297 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.49963182 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
0.038326293 = weight(_text_:22 in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038326293 = score(doc=4748,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16509943 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Metadata and information technology staff in libraries that are building digital collections typically extract and manipulate MARC metadata sets to provide access to digital content via non-MARC schemes. Metadata processing in these libraries involves defining the relationships between metadata schemes, moving metadata between schemes, and coordinating the intellectual activity and physical resources required to create and manipulate metadata. Actively managing the non-MARC metadata resources used to build digital collections is something most of these libraries have only begun to do. This article proposes strategies for managing MARC metadata repurposing efforts as the first step in a coordinated approach to library metadata management. Guided by lessons learned from Cornell University library mapping and transformation activities, the authors apply the literature of data resource management to library metadata management and propose a model for managing MARC metadata repurposing processes through the implementation of a metadata management design.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.144-152
-
Sacco, G.M.: Dynamic taxonomies and guided searches (2006)
0.07
0.06850332 = product of:
0.13700664 = sum of:
0.032345653 = weight(_text_:technology in 5295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032345653 = score(doc=5295,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.23034787 = fieldWeight in 5295, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5295)
0.10466099 = sum of:
0.041425828 = weight(_text_:management in 5295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041425828 = score(doc=5295,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15891297 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 5295, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5295)
0.06323516 = weight(_text_:22 in 5295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06323516 = score(doc=5295,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16509943 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 5295, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5295)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- A new search paradigm, in which the primary user activity is the guided exploration of a complex information space rather than the retrieval of items based on precise specifications, is proposed. The author claims that this paradigm is the norm in most practical applications, and that solutions based on traditional search methods are not effective in this context. He then presents a solution based on dynamic taxonomies, a knowledge management model that effectively guides users to reach their goal while giving them total freedom in exploring the information base. Applications, benefits, and current research are discussed.
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 17:56:22
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.6, S.792-796
-
Hemminger, B.M.: Introduction to the special issue on bioinformatics (2005)
0.06
0.063963234 = product of:
0.12792647 = sum of:
0.064691305 = weight(_text_:technology in 4189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.064691305 = score(doc=4189,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.46069574 = fieldWeight in 4189, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4189)
0.06323516 = product of:
0.12647033 = sum of:
0.12647033 = weight(_text_:22 in 4189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12647033 = score(doc=4189,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16509943 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.76602525 = fieldWeight in 4189, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4189)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 14:19:22
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 56(2005) no.5, S.437-439
-
Park, J.-r.; Lu, C.; Marion, L.: Cataloging professionals in the digital environment : a content analysis of job descriptions (2009)
0.06
0.06377628 = product of:
0.12755255 = sum of:
0.027724843 = weight(_text_:technology in 2766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027724843 = score(doc=2766,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 2766, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2766)
0.09982771 = sum of:
0.061501414 = weight(_text_:management in 2766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061501414 = score(doc=2766,freq=6.0), product of:
0.15891297 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.38701317 = fieldWeight in 2766, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2766)
0.038326293 = weight(_text_:22 in 2766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038326293 = score(doc=2766,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16509943 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2766, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2766)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- This study assesses the current state of responsibilities and skill sets required of cataloging professionals. It identifies emerging roles and competencies focusing on the digital environment and relates these to the established knowledge of traditional cataloging standards and practices. We conducted a content analysis of 349 job descriptions advertised in AutoCAT in 2005-2006. Multivariate techniques of cluster and multidimensional-scaling analyses were applied to the data. Analysis of job titles, required and preferred qualifications/skills, and responsibilities lends perspective to the roles that cataloging professionals play in the digital environment. Technological advances increasingly demand knowledge and skills related to electronic resource management, metadata creation, and computer and Web applications. Emerging knowledge and skill sets are increasingly being integrated into the core technical aspects of cataloging such as bibliographic and authority control and integrated library-system management. Management of cataloging functions is also in high demand. The results of the study provide insight on current and future curriculum design of library and information-science programs.
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 19:20:24
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.4, S.844-857
-
Ross, J.: ¬The impact of technology on indexing (2000)
0.06
0.06251732 = product of:
0.12503465 = sum of:
0.073932916 = weight(_text_:technology in 263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.073932916 = score(doc=263,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.5265094 = fieldWeight in 263, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=263)
0.05110173 = product of:
0.10220346 = sum of:
0.10220346 = weight(_text_:22 in 263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10220346 = score(doc=263,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16509943 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 263, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=263)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.25-26
-
Enser, P.G.B.: Visual image retrieval (2008)
0.06
0.06251732 = product of:
0.12503465 = sum of:
0.073932916 = weight(_text_:technology in 3281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.073932916 = score(doc=3281,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.5265094 = fieldWeight in 3281, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3281)
0.05110173 = product of:
0.10220346 = sum of:
0.10220346 = weight(_text_:22 in 3281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10220346 = score(doc=3281,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16509943 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3281, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3281)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 22. 1.2012 13:01:26
- Source
- Annual review of information science and technology. 42(2008), S.3-42
-
Morris, S.A.: Mapping research specialties (2008)
0.06
0.06251732 = product of:
0.12503465 = sum of:
0.073932916 = weight(_text_:technology in 3962) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.073932916 = score(doc=3962,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.5265094 = fieldWeight in 3962, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3962)
0.05110173 = product of:
0.10220346 = sum of:
0.10220346 = weight(_text_:22 in 3962) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10220346 = score(doc=3962,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16509943 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3962, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3962)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 13. 7.2008 9:30:22
- Source
- Annual review of information science and technology. 42(2008), S.xxx-xxx
-
Fallis, D.: Social epistemology and information science (2006)
0.06
0.06251732 = product of:
0.12503465 = sum of:
0.073932916 = weight(_text_:technology in 4368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.073932916 = score(doc=4368,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.5265094 = fieldWeight in 4368, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4368)
0.05110173 = product of:
0.10220346 = sum of:
0.10220346 = weight(_text_:22 in 4368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10220346 = score(doc=4368,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16509943 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4368, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4368)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 13. 7.2008 19:22:28
- Source
- Annual review of information science and technology. 40(2006), S.xxx-xxx
-
Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007)
0.06
0.06251732 = product of:
0.12503465 = sum of:
0.073932916 = weight(_text_:technology in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.073932916 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.5265094 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
0.05110173 = product of:
0.10220346 = sum of:
0.10220346 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10220346 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16509943 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 13. 7.2008 19:53:22
- Source
- Annual review of information science and technology. 41(2007), S.xxx-xxx
-
Martin, B.: Knowledge management (2008)
0.06
0.06063836 = product of:
0.12127672 = sum of:
0.073932916 = weight(_text_:technology in 4230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.073932916 = score(doc=4230,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.5265094 = fieldWeight in 4230, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4230)
0.047343805 = product of:
0.09468761 = sum of:
0.09468761 = weight(_text_:management in 4230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09468761 = score(doc=4230,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15891297 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.5958457 = fieldWeight in 4230, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4230)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Annual review of information science and technology. 42(2008), S.xxx-xxx
-
Jones, W.: Personal information management (2007)
0.06
0.06063836 = product of:
0.12127672 = sum of:
0.073932916 = weight(_text_:technology in 5382) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.073932916 = score(doc=5382,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.5265094 = fieldWeight in 5382, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5382)
0.047343805 = product of:
0.09468761 = sum of:
0.09468761 = weight(_text_:management in 5382) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09468761 = score(doc=5382,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15891297 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.04714662 = queryNorm
0.5958457 = fieldWeight in 5382, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5382)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Annual review of information science and technology. 41(2007), S.xxx-xxx
