Search (3645 results, page 1 of 183)

  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.19
    0.18611795 = product of:
      0.31019658 = sum of:
        0.07288601 = product of:
          0.21865803 = sum of:
            0.21865803 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.21865803 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.38905874 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04589033 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.21865803 = weight(_text_:2f in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21865803 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.38905874 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04589033 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.01865252 = product of:
          0.03730504 = sum of:
            0.03730504 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03730504 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16070013 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04589033 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  2. Schrodt, R.: Tiefen und Untiefen im wissenschaftlichen Sprachgebrauch (2008) 0.16
    0.15549016 = product of:
      0.3887254 = sum of:
        0.09718135 = product of:
          0.29154405 = sum of:
            0.29154405 = weight(_text_:3a in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.29154405 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.38905874 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04589033 = queryNorm
                0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.29154405 = weight(_text_:2f in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.29154405 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.38905874 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04589033 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Content
    Vgl. auch: https://studylibde.com/doc/13053640/richard-schrodt. Vgl. auch: http%3A%2F%2Fwww.univie.ac.at%2FGermanistik%2Fschrodt%2Fvorlesung%2Fwissenschaftssprache.doc&usg=AOvVaw1lDLDR6NFf1W0-oC9mEUJf.
  3. Fallis, D.: Social epistemology and information science (2006) 0.15
    0.1504173 = product of:
      0.2506955 = sum of:
        0.07196287 = weight(_text_:technology in 4368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07196287 = score(doc=4368,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13667917 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04589033 = queryNorm
            0.5265094 = fieldWeight in 4368, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4368)
        0.12899259 = weight(_text_:social in 4368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12899259 = score(doc=4368,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18299131 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04589033 = queryNorm
            0.704911 = fieldWeight in 4368, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4368)
        0.049740054 = product of:
          0.09948011 = sum of:
            0.09948011 = weight(_text_:22 in 4368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09948011 = score(doc=4368,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16070013 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04589033 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4368, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4368)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Date
    13. 7.2008 19:22:28
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 40(2006), S.xxx-xxx
  4. Vetere, G.; Lenzerini, M.: Models for semantic interoperability in service-oriented architectures (2005) 0.14
    0.1360539 = product of:
      0.34013474 = sum of:
        0.085033685 = product of:
          0.25510105 = sum of:
            0.25510105 = weight(_text_:3a in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.25510105 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.38905874 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04589033 = queryNorm
                0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.25510105 = weight(_text_:2f in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.25510105 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.38905874 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04589033 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5386707&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D5386707.
  5. Palfrey, J.; Gasser, U.: Generation Internet : die Digital Natives: Wie sie leben - Was sie denken - Wie sie arbeiten (2008) 0.13
    0.13167298 = product of:
      0.21945496 = sum of:
        0.035981435 = weight(_text_:technology in 6056) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035981435 = score(doc=6056,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.13667917 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04589033 = queryNorm
            0.2632547 = fieldWeight in 6056, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6056)
        0.11171087 = weight(_text_:social in 6056) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11171087 = score(doc=6056,freq=24.0), product of:
            0.18299131 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04589033 = queryNorm
            0.6104709 = fieldWeight in 6056, product of:
              4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                24.0 = termFreq=24.0
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6056)
        0.07176265 = product of:
          0.1435253 = sum of:
            0.1435253 = weight(_text_:aspects in 6056) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1435253 = score(doc=6056,freq=24.0), product of:
                0.20741826 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04589033 = queryNorm
                0.69196075 = fieldWeight in 6056, product of:
                  4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                    24.0 = termFreq=24.0
                  4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6056)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    LCSH
    Information society / Social aspects
    Information technology / Social aspects
    Technological innovations / Social aspects
    Internet / Social aspects
    Technology / Social aspects
    Digital media / Social aspects
    Subject
    Information society / Social aspects
    Information technology / Social aspects
    Technological innovations / Social aspects
    Internet / Social aspects
    Technology / Social aspects
    Digital media / Social aspects
  6. Stojanovic, N.: Ontology-based Information Retrieval : methods and tools for cooperative query answering (2005) 0.13
    0.12741205 = product of:
      0.21235341 = sum of:
        0.048590675 = product of:
          0.14577202 = sum of:
            0.14577202 = weight(_text_:3a in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14577202 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.38905874 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04589033 = queryNorm
                0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.017990718 = weight(_text_:technology in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017990718 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13667917 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04589033 = queryNorm
            0.13162735 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
        0.14577202 = weight(_text_:2f in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14577202 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.38905874 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04589033 = queryNorm
            0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    By the explosion of possibilities for a ubiquitous content production, the information overload problem reaches the level of complexity which cannot be managed by traditional modelling approaches anymore. Due to their pure syntactical nature traditional information retrieval approaches did not succeed in treating content itself (i.e. its meaning, and not its representation). This leads to a very low usefulness of the results of a retrieval process for a user's task at hand. In the last ten years ontologies have been emerged from an interesting conceptualisation paradigm to a very promising (semantic) modelling technology, especially in the context of the Semantic Web. From the information retrieval point of view, ontologies enable a machine-understandable form of content description, such that the retrieval process can be driven by the meaning of the content. However, the very ambiguous nature of the retrieval process in which a user, due to the unfamiliarity with the underlying repository and/or query syntax, just approximates his information need in a query, implies a necessity to include the user in the retrieval process more actively in order to close the gap between the meaning of the content and the meaning of a user's query (i.e. his information need). This thesis lays foundation for such an ontology-based interactive retrieval process, in which the retrieval system interacts with a user in order to conceptually interpret the meaning of his query, whereas the underlying domain ontology drives the conceptualisation process. In that way the retrieval process evolves from a query evaluation process into a highly interactive cooperation between a user and the retrieval system, in which the system tries to anticipate the user's information need and to deliver the relevant content proactively. Moreover, the notion of content relevance for a user's query evolves from a content dependent artefact to the multidimensional context-dependent structure, strongly influenced by the user's preferences. This cooperation process is realized as the so-called Librarian Agent Query Refinement Process. In order to clarify the impact of an ontology on the retrieval process (regarding its complexity and quality), a set of methods and tools for different levels of content and query formalisation is developed, ranging from pure ontology-based inferencing to keyword-based querying in which semantics automatically emerges from the results. Our evaluation studies have shown that the possibilities to conceptualize a user's information need in the right manner and to interpret the retrieval results accordingly are key issues for realizing much more meaningful information retrieval systems.
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F1627&ei=tAtYUYrBNoHKtQb3l4GYBw&usg=AFQjCNHeaxKkKU3-u54LWxMNYGXaaDLCGw&sig2=8WykXWQoDKjDSdGtAakH2Q&bvm=bv.44442042,d.Yms.
  7. Yetim, F.: Universal Actability : Towards an integral understanding of universal usability, (intercultural) action competence, and information systems actability (2004) 0.13
    0.12613353 = product of:
      0.21022254 = sum of:
        0.026986076 = weight(_text_:technology in 377) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026986076 = score(doc=377,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13667917 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04589033 = queryNorm
            0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 377, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=377)
        0.08378315 = weight(_text_:social in 377) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08378315 = score(doc=377,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.18299131 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04589033 = queryNorm
            0.45785317 = fieldWeight in 377, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=377)
        0.09945331 = sum of:
          0.06214827 = weight(_text_:aspects in 377) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06214827 = score(doc=377,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20741826 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04589033 = queryNorm
              0.29962775 = fieldWeight in 377, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=377)
          0.03730504 = weight(_text_:22 in 377) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03730504 = score(doc=377,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16070013 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04589033 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 377, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=377)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    The approach to information systems actability emphasizes the social action character of information systems and its social context. It aims at a pragmatically and social sensitive approach to information systems. This paper extends the scope and focus of this approach by suggesting a research framework called universal actability. The research framework advocates for an integral understanding of universal usability, human communication and action competence, and information systems actability. To pursue this research objective, this paper focuses on the following aspects: It provides a critical review of the concepts of the previous research on information systems actability and suggests some extensions and revisions towards universal actability. In addition, it discusses several maxims for (intercultural) communications and their implications for the actors and systems. Finally, it reflects on the applicability of user modeling technology for modeling diversity in order to enhance actor's and system's actability across diverse contexts.
    Date
    22. 6.2007 13:31:31
  8. Song, F.W.: Virtual communities : bowling alone, online together (2009) 0.13
    0.12523593 = product of:
      0.20872654 = sum of:
        0.05028559 = weight(_text_:technology in 3287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05028559 = score(doc=3287,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.13667917 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04589033 = queryNorm
            0.36790967 = fieldWeight in 3287, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3287)
        0.106650725 = weight(_text_:social in 3287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.106650725 = score(doc=3287,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.18299131 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04589033 = queryNorm
            0.5828185 = fieldWeight in 3287, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3287)
        0.051790226 = product of:
          0.10358045 = sum of:
            0.10358045 = weight(_text_:aspects in 3287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10358045 = score(doc=3287,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.20741826 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04589033 = queryNorm
                0.4993796 = fieldWeight in 3287, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3287)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    Does contemporary Internet technology strengthen civic engagement and democratic practice? The recent surge in online community participation has become a cultural phenomenon enmeshed in ongoing debates about the health of American civil society. But observations about online communities often concentrate on ascertaining the true nature of community and democracy, typically rehearsing familiar communitarian and liberal perspectives. This book seeks to understand the technology on its own terms, focusing on how the technological and organizational configurations of online communities frame our contemporary beliefs and assumptions about community and the individual. It analyzes key structural features of thirty award-winning online community websites to show that while the values of individual autonomy, egalitarianism, and freedom of speech dominate the discursive content of these communities, the practical realities of online life are clearly marked by exclusivity and the demands of commercialization and corporate surveillance. Promises of social empowerment are framed within consumer and therapeutic frameworks that undermine their democratic efficacy. As a result, online communities fail to revolutionize the civic landscape because they create cultures of membership that epitomize the commodification of community and public life altogether.
    COMPASS
    Online social networks
    Internet / Social aspects
    Information technology / Social aspects
    Content
    Inhalt: The virtual community -- A high-stakes battle : the context of virtual communities -- A cultural topography of virtual communities : the rough terrain of autonomy and control -- An alternative framework for understanding virtual communities -- The institutional landscape : the market of virtual communities -- The evolving landscape of virtual communities -- Technology, the self, and the market : eyeing the horizons of a brave new democracy -- Epilogue
    Subject
    Online social networks
    Internet / Social aspects
    Information technology / Social aspects
  9. Mas, S.; Marleau, Y.: Proposition of a faceted classification model to support corporate information organization and digital records management (2009) 0.12
    0.11661762 = product of:
      0.29154405 = sum of:
        0.07288601 = product of:
          0.21865803 = sum of:
            0.21865803 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.21865803 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.38905874 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04589033 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.21865803 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21865803 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.38905874 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04589033 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?reload=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4755313%2F4755314%2F04755480.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4755480&authDecision=-203.
  10. Ding, Y.; Jacob, E.K.; Zhang, Z.; Foo, S.; Yan, E.; George, N.L.; Guo, L.: Perspectives on social tagging (2009) 0.11
    0.11162466 = product of:
      0.18604109 = sum of:
        0.026986076 = weight(_text_:technology in 3290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026986076 = score(doc=3290,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13667917 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04589033 = queryNorm
            0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 3290, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3290)
        0.12798087 = weight(_text_:social in 3290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12798087 = score(doc=3290,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.18299131 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04589033 = queryNorm
            0.69938225 = fieldWeight in 3290, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3290)
        0.031074135 = product of:
          0.06214827 = sum of:
            0.06214827 = weight(_text_:aspects in 3290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06214827 = score(doc=3290,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20741826 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04589033 = queryNorm
                0.29962775 = fieldWeight in 3290, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3290)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    Social tagging is one of the major phenomena transforming the World Wide Web from a static platform into an actively shared information space. This paper addresses various aspects of social tagging, including different views on the nature of social tagging, how to make use of social tags, and how to bridge social tagging with other Web functionalities; it discusses the use of facets to facilitate browsing and searching of tagging data; and it presents an analogy between bibliometrics and tagometrics, arguing that established bibliometric methodologies can be applied to analyze tagging behavior on the Web. Based on the Upper Tag Ontology (UTO), a Web crawler was built to harvest tag data from Delicious, Flickr, and YouTube in September 2007. In total, 1.8 million objects, including bookmarks, photos, and videos, 3.1 million taggers, and 12.1 million tags were collected and analyzed. Some tagging patterns and variations are identified and discussed.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.12, S.2388-2401
    Theme
    Social tagging
  11. Andrew Keenan, A.; Shiri, A.: Sociability and social interaction on social networking websites (2009) 0.11
    0.109246366 = product of:
      0.18207727 = sum of:
        0.022488397 = weight(_text_:technology in 3630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022488397 = score(doc=3630,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13667917 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04589033 = queryNorm
            0.16453418 = fieldWeight in 3630, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3630)
        0.13369375 = weight(_text_:social in 3630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13369375 = score(doc=3630,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.18299131 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04589033 = queryNorm
            0.73060167 = fieldWeight in 3630, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3630)
        0.025895113 = product of:
          0.051790226 = sum of:
            0.051790226 = weight(_text_:aspects in 3630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.051790226 = score(doc=3630,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20741826 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04589033 = queryNorm
                0.2496898 = fieldWeight in 3630, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3630)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - Social websites have become a major medium for social interaction. From Facebook to MySpace to emergent sites like Twitter, social websites are increasing exponentially in user numbers and unique visits every day. How do these websites encourage sociability? What features or design practices enable users to socialize with other users? The purpose of this paper is to explore sociability on the social web and details how different social websites encourage their users to interact. Design/methodology/approach - Four social websites (Facebook, MySpace, LinkedIn and Twitter) were examined from a user study perspective. After thoroughly participating on the websites, a series of observations were recorded from each experience. These experiences were then compared to understand the different approaches of each website. Findings - Social websites use a number of different approaches to encourage sociability amongst their users. Facebook promotes privacy and representing "real world" networks in web environment, while MySpace promotes publicity and representing both real world and virtual networks in a web environment. Niche websites like LinkedIn and Twitter focus on more specific aspects of community and technology, respectively. Originality/value - A comparison of different models of sociability does not yet exist. This study focuses specifically on what makes social websites "social."
  12. Donsbach, W.: Wahrheit in den Medien : über den Sinn eines methodischen Objektivitätsbegriffes (2001) 0.10
    0.09718136 = product of:
      0.24295339 = sum of:
        0.060738347 = product of:
          0.18221503 = sum of:
            0.18221503 = weight(_text_:3a in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.18221503 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.38905874 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04589033 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.18221503 = weight(_text_:2f in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18221503 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.38905874 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04589033 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Source
    Politische Meinung. 381(2001) Nr.1, S.65-74 [https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dgfe.de%2Ffileadmin%2FOrdnerRedakteure%2FSektionen%2FSek02_AEW%2FKWF%2FPublikationen_Reihe_1989-2003%2FBand_17%2FBd_17_1994_355-406_A.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2KcbRsHy5UQ9QRIUyuOLNi]
  13. Human perspectives in the Internet society : culture, psychology and gender; International Conference on Human Perspectives in the Internet Society <1, 2004, Cádiz> (2004) 0.10
    0.09632369 = product of:
      0.16053948 = sum of:
        0.03243323 = weight(_text_:technology in 91) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03243323 = score(doc=91,freq=26.0), product of:
            0.13667917 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04589033 = queryNorm
            0.2372946 = fieldWeight in 91, product of:
              5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
                26.0 = termFreq=26.0
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=91)
        0.04837222 = weight(_text_:social in 91) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04837222 = score(doc=91,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.18299131 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04589033 = queryNorm
            0.26434162 = fieldWeight in 91, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=91)
        0.079734035 = sum of:
          0.06214827 = weight(_text_:aspects in 91) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06214827 = score(doc=91,freq=18.0), product of:
              0.20741826 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04589033 = queryNorm
              0.29962775 = fieldWeight in 91, product of:
                4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                  18.0 = termFreq=18.0
                4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
                0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=91)
          0.017585764 = weight(_text_:22 in 91) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.017585764 = score(doc=91,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.16070013 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04589033 = queryNorm
              0.109432176 = fieldWeight in 91, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=91)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Classification
    303.48/33 22 (LoC)
    DDC
    303.48/33 22 (LoC)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIST 58(2007) no.1, S.150-151 (L. Westbrook): "The purpose of this volume is to bring together various analyses by international scholars of the social and cultural impact of information technology on individuals and societies (preface, n.p.). It grew from the First International Conference on Human Perspectives in the Internet Society held in Cadiz, Spain, in 2004. The editors and contributors have addressed an impressive array of significant issues with rigorous research and insightful analysis although the resulting volume does suffer from the usual unevenness in depth and content that affects books based on conference proceedings. Although the $256 price is prohibitive for many individual scholars, the effort to obtain a library edition for perusal regarding particular areas of interest is likely to prove worthwhile. Unlike many international conferences that are able to attract scholars from only a handful of nations, this genuinely diverse conference included research conducted in Australia, Beijing, Canada, Croatia, the Czech Republic, England, Fiji, Germany, Greece, Iran, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Jordan, Malaysia, Norway, Russia, Scotland, South Africa, Sweden, Taiwan, and the United States. The expense of a conference format and governmental travel restrictions may have precluded greater inclusion of the work being done to develop information technology for use in nonindustrialized nations in support of economic, social justice, and political movements. Although the cultural variants among these nations preclude direct cross-cultural comparisons, many papers carefully provide sufficient background information to make basic conceptual transfers possible. A great strength of the work is the unusual combination of academic disciplines that contributes substantially to the depth of many individual papers, particularly when they are read within the larger context of the entire volume. Although complete professional affiliations are not universally available, the authors who did name their affiliation come from widely divergent disciplines including accounting, business administration, architecture, business computing, communication, computing, economics, educational technology, environmental management, experimental psychology, gender research in computer science, geography, human work sciences, humanistic informatics, industrial engineering, information management, informatics in transport and telecommunications, information science, information technology, management, mathematics, organizational behavior, pedagogy, psychology, telemedicine, and women's education. This is all to the good, but the lack of representation from departments of women's studies, gender studies, and library studies certainly limits the breadth and depth of the perspectives provided.
    The editorial and peer review processes appear to be slightly spotty in application. All of the 55 papers are in English but a few of them are in such need of basic editing that they are almost incomprehensible in sections. Consider, for example, the following: "So, the meaning of region where we are studying on, should be discovered and then affect on the final plan" (p. 346). The collection shows a strong array of methodological approaches including quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods studies; however, a few of the research efforts exhibit fundamental design flaws. Consider, for example, the study that "set[s] out to show that nurses as care-givers find it difficult to transfer any previously acquired technological skills into their work based on technology needs (p. 187). After studying 39 female and 6 male nurses, this study finds, not surprisingly, exactly what it "set out" to find. Rather than noting the limitations of sample size and data gathering techniques, the paper firmly concludes that nurses can be technologists "only in areas of technology that support their primary role as carers" (p. 188). Finally, some of the papers do not report on original research but are competent, if brief, summaries of theories or concepts that are covered in equal depth elsewhere. For example, a three-page summary of "the major personality and learning theories" (p. 3) is useful but lacks the intellectual depth or insight needed to contribute substantially to the field. These problems with composition, methodological rigor, and theoretical depth are not uncommon in papers designed for a broadly defined conference theme. The authors may have been writing for an in-person audience and anticipating thoughtful postpresentation discussions; they probably had no idea of the heavy price tag put on their work. The editors, however, might have kept that $256 in mind and exercised a heavier editorial hand. Perhaps the publisher could have paid for a careful subject indexing of the work as a substantive addition to the author index provided. The complexity of the subject domains included in the volume certainly merits careful indexing.
    The volume is organized into 13 sections, each of which contains between two and eight conference papers. As with most conferences, the papers do not cover the issues in each section with equal weight or depth but the editors have grouped papers into reasonable patterns. Section 1 covers "understanding online behavior" with eight papers on problems such as e-learning attitudes, the neuropsychology of HCI, Japanese blogger motivation, and the dividing line between computer addiction and high engagement. Sections 2 (personality and computer attitudes), 3 (cyber interactions), and 4 (new interaction methods) each contain only two papers on topics such as helmet-mounted displays, online energy audits, and the use of ICT in family life. Sections 6, 7, and 8 focus on gender issues with papers on career development, the computer literacy of Malaysian women, mentoring, gaming, and faculty job satisfaction. Sections 9 and 10 move to a broader examination of cyber society and its diversity concerns with papers on cultural identity, virtual architecture, economic growth's impact on culture, and Iranian development impediments. Section 11's two articles on advertising might well have been merged with those of section 13's ebusiness. Section 12 addressed education with papers on topics such as computer-assisted homework, assessment, and Web-based learning. It would have been useful to introduce each section with a brief definition of the theme, summaries of the major contributions of the authors, and analyses of the gaps that might be addressed in future conferences. Despite the aforementioned concerns, this volume does provide a uniquely rich array of technological analyses embedded in social context. An examination of recent works in related areas finds nothing that is this complex culturally or that has such diversity of disciplines. Cultural Production in a Digital Age (Klinenberg, 2005), Perspectives and Policies on ICT in Society (Berleur & Avgerou, 2005), and Social, Ethical, and Policy Implications of Information Technology (Brennan & Johnson, 2004) address various aspects of the society/Internet intersection but this volume is unique in its coverage of psychology, gender, and culture issues in cyberspace. The lip service often given to global concerns and the value of interdisciplinary analysis of intransigent social problems seldom develop into a genuine willingness to listen to unfamiliar research paradigms. Academic silos and cultural islands need conferences like this one-willing to take on the risk of examining the large questions in an intellectually open space. Editorial and methodological concerns notwithstanding, this volume merits review and, where appropriate, careful consideration across disciplines."
    LCSH
    Information technology / Psychological aspects / Congresses
    Information technology / Social aspects / Congresses
    Information technology / Economic aspects / Congresses
    Internet / Social aspects / Congresses
    Subject
    Information technology / Psychological aspects / Congresses
    Information technology / Social aspects / Congresses
    Information technology / Economic aspects / Congresses
    Internet / Social aspects / Congresses
  14. Jacobs, N.: Information technology and interests in scholarly communication : a discourse analysis (2001) 0.09
    0.09207296 = product of:
      0.15345493 = sum of:
        0.05397215 = weight(_text_:technology in 6848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05397215 = score(doc=6848,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.13667917 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04589033 = queryNorm
            0.39488205 = fieldWeight in 6848, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6848)
        0.068408646 = weight(_text_:social in 6848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.068408646 = score(doc=6848,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18299131 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04589033 = queryNorm
            0.3738355 = fieldWeight in 6848, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6848)
        0.031074135 = product of:
          0.06214827 = sum of:
            0.06214827 = weight(_text_:aspects in 6848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06214827 = score(doc=6848,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20741826 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04589033 = queryNorm
                0.29962775 = fieldWeight in 6848, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6848)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    Although technological determinism is an inadequate description of change, it remains common, if implicit, in much information science literature. Recent developments in science and technology studies offer a social constructivist alternative, in which technology is seen, not as autonomous, but as the result of interests. However, the stability of these interests can be argued to privilege social factors in the same way as technological determinism privileges technological factors. A second alternative is to shift to a relativist stance and analyze discourse as interaction, rather than as a neutral carrier of information, or communication. The focus of the discourse analyses of interview interactions presented in this article is on two aspects of discursive structure, the indexical category of "research," and interest management, which refers to the ways that participants manage their own and others' stakes in particular accounts. The article concludes by noting how formal scholarly communication acts as a "category entitlement" in interviews, and how technological determinism works as a dilemma for this entitlement that participants (including researchers) negotiate at the very local level of their interactions and accounts.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 52(2001) no.13, S.1122-1133
  15. Pan, S.L.; Newell, S.; Huang, J.; Galliers, R.D.: Overcoming knowledge management challenges during ERP implementation : the need to integrate and share different types of knowledge (2007) 0.09
    0.08510602 = product of:
      0.14184336 = sum of:
        0.026986076 = weight(_text_:technology in 145) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026986076 = score(doc=145,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13667917 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04589033 = queryNorm
            0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 145, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=145)
        0.08378315 = weight(_text_:social in 145) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08378315 = score(doc=145,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.18299131 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04589033 = queryNorm
            0.45785317 = fieldWeight in 145, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=145)
        0.031074135 = product of:
          0.06214827 = sum of:
            0.06214827 = weight(_text_:aspects in 145) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06214827 = score(doc=145,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20741826 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04589033 = queryNorm
                0.29962775 = fieldWeight in 145, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=145)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    In this article, the author examines an enterprise resource planning (ERP) adoption process in a particular case setting to explore the knowledge management challenges encountered, specifically challenges related to the sharing and integration of knowledge, and the ways that social capital is used to overcome these challenges. More specifically, the author relates the different sources and effects of social capital to the different implementation phases, with their differing knowledge management challenges. By doing so, he highlights the relative importance of the bridging and bonding aspects of social capital that vary during different phases because of the different types of knowledge that become more or less important over the lifecycle of the project - embrained, embodied, encultured, embedded, and encoded.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 58(2007) no.3, S.404-419
  16. Berman, Y.; Phillips, D.: Information and social quality (2001) 0.08
    0.08175119 = product of:
      0.20437798 = sum of:
        0.16043252 = weight(_text_:social in 703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16043252 = score(doc=703,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.18299131 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04589033 = queryNorm
            0.87672204 = fieldWeight in 703, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=703)
        0.04394546 = product of:
          0.08789092 = sum of:
            0.08789092 = weight(_text_:aspects in 703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08789092 = score(doc=703,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.20741826 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04589033 = queryNorm
                0.42373765 = fieldWeight in 703, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=703)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    This paper introduces the concept of 'social quality' as a measure of quality-of-life and it sets out a framework for identifying social indicators of the relationship between information and social quality. Social quality has four elements: socio - economic security, social inclusion, social cohesion and empowerment. Illustrative indicators are identified at both national (Demos) and community (Ethnos) level for four different aspects of each social quality element: input, process, outcome and impact. Then the distribution of information and social quality between Demos and Ethnos levels is investigated. It is concluded that usable indicators of all aspects of each element of social quality can be identified and that analysis of informational social quality at Demos and Ethnos level can add to knowledge about information provision and policy, particularly with reference to minority and marginal communities.
  17. Harman, D.; Voorhees, E.: Social TREC : an overview (2006) 0.08
    0.08038218 = product of:
      0.20095545 = sum of:
        0.07196287 = weight(_text_:technology in 4458) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07196287 = score(doc=4458,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13667917 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04589033 = queryNorm
            0.5265094 = fieldWeight in 4458, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4458)
        0.12899259 = weight(_text_:social in 4458) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12899259 = score(doc=4458,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18299131 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04589033 = queryNorm
            0.704911 = fieldWeight in 4458, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4458)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 40(2006), S.xxx-xxx
  18. Hunter, J.: Collaborative semantic tagging and annotation systems (2009) 0.08
    0.08038218 = product of:
      0.20095545 = sum of:
        0.07196287 = weight(_text_:technology in 7382) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07196287 = score(doc=7382,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13667917 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04589033 = queryNorm
            0.5265094 = fieldWeight in 7382, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7382)
        0.12899259 = weight(_text_:social in 7382) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12899259 = score(doc=7382,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18299131 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04589033 = queryNorm
            0.704911 = fieldWeight in 7382, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7382)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 43(2009), S.xxx-xxx
    Theme
    Social tagging
  19. Sawyer, S.; Eschenfelder, K.R.: Social informatics : perspectives, examples, and trends (2002) 0.08
    0.08038218 = product of:
      0.20095545 = sum of:
        0.07196287 = weight(_text_:technology in 4292) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07196287 = score(doc=4292,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13667917 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04589033 = queryNorm
            0.5265094 = fieldWeight in 4292, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4292)
        0.12899259 = weight(_text_:social in 4292) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12899259 = score(doc=4292,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18299131 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04589033 = queryNorm
            0.704911 = fieldWeight in 4292, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4292)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 36(2002), S.427-466
  20. Garfield, E.: Recollections of Irving H. Sher 1924-1996 : Polymath/information scientist extraordinaire (2001) 0.08
    0.079833075 = product of:
      0.13305512 = sum of:
        0.03148376 = weight(_text_:technology in 6920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03148376 = score(doc=6920,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13667917 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04589033 = queryNorm
            0.23034787 = fieldWeight in 6920, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6920)
        0.07981009 = weight(_text_:social in 6920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07981009 = score(doc=6920,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18299131 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04589033 = queryNorm
            0.43614143 = fieldWeight in 6920, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6920)
        0.021761272 = product of:
          0.043522544 = sum of:
            0.043522544 = weight(_text_:22 in 6920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043522544 = score(doc=6920,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16070013 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04589033 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6920, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6920)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    Over a 35-year period, Irving H. Sher played a critical role in the development and implementation of the Science Citation Index and other ISI products. Trained as a biochemist, statistician, and linguist, Sher brought a unique combination of talents to ISI as Director of Quality Control and Director of Research and Development. His talents as a teacher and mentor evoked loyalty. He was a particularly inventive but self-taught programmer. In addition to the SCI, Social Sciences Citation Index, and Arts and Humanities Citation Index,
    Date
    16.12.2001 14:01:22
    Object
    Social Sciences Citation Index
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 52(2001) no.14, S.1197-1202

Languages

Types

  • a 3149
  • m 351
  • el 153
  • s 136
  • b 30
  • x 24
  • i 11
  • r 7
  • n 3
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications