-
Horn, M.E.: "Garbage" in, "refuse and refuse disposal" out : making the most of the subject authority file in the OPAC (2002)
0.15
0.14571878 = product of:
0.21857816 = sum of:
0.05940771 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05940771 = score(doc=156,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19731061 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.30108726 = fieldWeight in 156, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=156)
0.15917045 = sum of:
0.11110266 = weight(_text_:searching in 156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11110266 = score(doc=156,freq=6.0), product of:
0.20502694 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.541893 = fieldWeight in 156, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=156)
0.048067793 = weight(_text_:22 in 156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048067793 = score(doc=156,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17748274 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 156, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=156)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Subject access in the OPAC, as discussed in this article, is predicated on two different kinds of searching: subject (authority, alphabetic, or controlled vocabulary searching) or keyword (uncontrolled, free text, natural language vocabulary). The literature has focused on demonstrating that both approaches are needed, but very few authors address the need to integrate keyword into authority searching. The article discusses this difference and compares, with a query on the term garbage, search results in two online catalogs, one that performs keyword searches through the authority file and one where only bibliographic records are included in keyword searches.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Dezelar-Tiedman, C.; Genereux, C.; Hearn, S.: Utilizing Z39.50 to obtain bibliographic copy : a cost-containment study (2006)
0.14
0.13896322 = product of:
0.20844483 = sum of:
0.07201302 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07201302 = score(doc=113,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19731061 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.3649729 = fieldWeight in 113, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=113)
0.13643181 = sum of:
0.09523085 = weight(_text_:searching in 113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09523085 = score(doc=113,freq=6.0), product of:
0.20502694 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.46447968 = fieldWeight in 113, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=113)
0.041200966 = weight(_text_:22 in 113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041200966 = score(doc=113,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17748274 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 113, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=113)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This paper looks at one approach to controlling costs when seeking cataloging copy. A small task group in the University of Minnesota Libraries Technical Services Department conducted a study to devise the most cost-effective strategy for searching for and importing bibliographic copy, by compiling costs and benefits of importing records from the OCLC Online Computer Library Center database, the Research Libraries Group Union Catalog (RLIN), and the Library of Congress (LC) catalog. Results of the study indicated that, although the LC database is smaller than the other two utilities, a sufficient portion of needed records were available from LC to more than offset the cost of re-searching in the other databases for records not found. In addition, due to differences in pricing structure, searching RLIN second was found to be more cost effective than going next to OCLC, even though a slightly larger proportion of items were found in OCLC than RLIN. This study may prove useful either as a research method or in terms of its findings for other libraries wishing to compare sources of cataloging copy.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Wildemuth, B.M.: Evidence-based practice in search interface design (2006)
0.13
0.13212697 = product of:
0.19819045 = sum of:
0.05940771 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 5302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05940771 = score(doc=5302,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19731061 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.30108726 = fieldWeight in 5302, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5302)
0.13878274 = sum of:
0.09071494 = weight(_text_:searching in 5302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09071494 = score(doc=5302,freq=4.0), product of:
0.20502694 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.44245374 = fieldWeight in 5302, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5302)
0.048067793 = weight(_text_:22 in 5302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048067793 = score(doc=5302,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17748274 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5302, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5302)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- An evidence-based practice approach to search interface design is proposed, with the goal of designing interfaces that adequately support search strategy formulation and reformulation. Relevant findings from studies of information professionals' searching behaviors, end users' searching of bibliographic databases, and search behaviors on the Web are highlighted. Three brief examples are presented to illustrate the ways in which findings from such studies can be used to make decisions about the design of search interfaces. If academic research can be effectively connected with design practice, we can discover which design practices truly are best practices and incorporate them into future search interfaces.
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 18:30:09
-
Weber, R.: "Functional requirements for bibliographic records" und Regelwerksentwicklung (2001)
0.11
0.11125548 = product of:
0.16688322 = sum of:
0.11881542 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 6838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11881542 = score(doc=6838,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19731061 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.6021745 = fieldWeight in 6838, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6838)
0.048067793 = product of:
0.09613559 = sum of:
0.09613559 = weight(_text_:22 in 6838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09613559 = score(doc=6838,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17748274 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6838, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6838)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- Dialog mit Bibliotheken. 13(2001) H.3, S.20-22
-
Antelman, K.: Identifying the serial work as a bibliographic entity (2004)
0.10
0.103549674 = product of:
0.1553245 = sum of:
0.13472402 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 130) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13472402 = score(doc=130,freq=14.0), product of:
0.19731061 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.6828017 = fieldWeight in 130, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=130)
0.020600483 = product of:
0.041200966 = sum of:
0.041200966 = weight(_text_:22 in 130) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041200966 = score(doc=130,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17748274 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 130, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=130)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- A solid theoretical foundation has been built over the years exploring the bibliographic work and developing cataloging rules and practices to describe the work in the traditional catalog. With the increasing prevalence of multiple manifestations of serial titles, as well as tools that automate discovery and retrieval, bibliographic control of serials at a higher level of abstraction is more necessary than ever before. At the same time, models such as the International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions' Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records offer new opportunities to control all bibliographic entities at this higher level and build more useful catalog displays. The bibliographic mechanisms that control the work for monographs - author, title, and uniform title - are weak identifiers for serials. New identifiers being adopted by the content industry are built on models and practices that are fundamentally different from those underlying the new bibliographic models. What is needed is a work identifier for serials that is both congruent with the new models and can enable us to meet the objective of providing work-level access to all resources in our catalogs.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Seminario FRBR : Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records: reguisiti funzionali per record bibliografici, Florence, 27-28 January 2000, Proceedings (2000)
0.10
0.102903895 = product of:
0.15435584 = sum of:
0.1200217 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 3948) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1200217 = score(doc=3948,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19731061 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.6082881 = fieldWeight in 3948, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3948)
0.034334138 = product of:
0.068668276 = sum of:
0.068668276 = weight(_text_:22 in 3948) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.068668276 = score(doc=3948,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17748274 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3948, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3948)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Content
- Enthält u.a.: Grimaldi, T.: The object of cataloguing; Byrum, J.D., O.M.A. Madison: Reflections an the goals, concepts and recommendations of the IFLA study an Functional Requirements of Bibliographic Records;
- Date
- 29. 8.2005 12:54:22
-
Lim, E.: Southeast Asian subject gateways : an examination of their classification practices (2000)
0.10
0.09536184 = product of:
0.14304276 = sum of:
0.10184179 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 6040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10184179 = score(doc=6040,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19731061 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.5161496 = fieldWeight in 6040, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6040)
0.041200966 = product of:
0.08240193 = sum of:
0.08240193 = weight(_text_:22 in 6040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08240193 = score(doc=6040,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17748274 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6040, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6040)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 22. 6.2002 19:42:47
- Source
- International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 29(2000) no.3, S.45-48
-
Parent, I.: International and national cataloguing rules : current situation and future trends, Moscow, 20-24 April 1999 (2000)
0.10
0.09536184 = product of:
0.14304276 = sum of:
0.10184179 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 6465) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10184179 = score(doc=6465,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19731061 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.5161496 = fieldWeight in 6465, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6465)
0.041200966 = product of:
0.08240193 = sum of:
0.08240193 = weight(_text_:22 in 6465) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08240193 = score(doc=6465,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17748274 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6465, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6465)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 11. 8.2001 17:22:42
- Source
- International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 29(2000) no.1, S.9-12
-
Bourdon, F.: Functional requirements and numbering of authority records (FRANAR) : to what extent can authority control be supported by technical means? (2002)
0.10
0.09536184 = product of:
0.14304276 = sum of:
0.10184179 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 3929) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10184179 = score(doc=3929,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19731061 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.5161496 = fieldWeight in 3929, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3929)
0.041200966 = product of:
0.08240193 = sum of:
0.08240193 = weight(_text_:22 in 3929) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08240193 = score(doc=3929,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17748274 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3929, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3929)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 30. 8.2005 9:22:54
- Source
- International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 31(2002) no.1, S.6-9
-
Dini, L.: CACAO : multilingual access to bibliographic records (2007)
0.10
0.09536184 = product of:
0.14304276 = sum of:
0.10184179 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10184179 = score(doc=126,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19731061 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.5161496 = fieldWeight in 126, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=126)
0.041200966 = product of:
0.08240193 = sum of:
0.08240193 = weight(_text_:22 in 126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08240193 = score(doc=126,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17748274 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 126, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=126)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Content
- Vortrag anlässlich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
-
Beall, J.; Kafadar, K.: ¬The effectiveness of copy cotaloging at eliminating typographical errors in shared bibliographic records (2004)
0.10
0.09523289 = product of:
0.14284933 = sum of:
0.11881542 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 4849) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11881542 = score(doc=4849,freq=8.0), product of:
0.19731061 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.6021745 = fieldWeight in 4849, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4849)
0.024033897 = product of:
0.048067793 = sum of:
0.048067793 = weight(_text_:22 in 4849) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048067793 = score(doc=4849,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17748274 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4849, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4849)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Typographical errors in bibliographic records can cause retrieval problems in online catalogs. This study examined one hundred typographical errors in records in the OCLC WorldCat database. The local catalogs of five libraries holding the items described by the bibliographic records with typographical errors were searched to determine whether each library had corrected the errors. The study found that only 35.8 percent of the errors had been corrected. Knowledge of copy cataloging error rates can help underscore the importance of quality data in bibliographic utilities and, further, can serve as an indication to libraries whether they need to pay more attention to correcting types in the copy cataloging process.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
East, J.W.: Z39.50 and personal bibliographic software (2003)
0.09
0.08997983 = product of:
0.13496974 = sum of:
0.102897175 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 4783) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.102897175 = score(doc=4783,freq=6.0), product of:
0.19731061 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.52149844 = fieldWeight in 4783, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4783)
0.032072574 = product of:
0.06414515 = sum of:
0.06414515 = weight(_text_:searching in 4783) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06414515 = score(doc=4783,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20502694 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.31286204 = fieldWeight in 4783, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4783)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Many thousands of researchers are now using personal bibliographic managers such as Reference Manager, EndNote and ProCite to access bibliographic databases via the Z39.50 protocol. With the EndNote software as an example, this paper demonstrates how researchers are using a standard search interface to access diverse databases and download references into their personal databases. There follows an overview of problems involved in searching the Z39.50 servers of some standard library automation systems (Innovative Interfaces, GEAC, SIRSI, Endeavour) and of two vendors of non-OPAC databases (Research Libraries Group and SilverPlatter). The paper concludes with some suggestions as to how the library community can contribute to improving the effectiveness of Z39.50 as a research tool.
-
Arsenault, C.: Word division in the transcription of Chinese script in the title fields of bibliographic Records (2001)
0.09
0.08997983 = product of:
0.13496974 = sum of:
0.102897175 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 5434) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.102897175 = score(doc=5434,freq=6.0), product of:
0.19731061 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.52149844 = fieldWeight in 5434, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5434)
0.032072574 = product of:
0.06414515 = sum of:
0.06414515 = weight(_text_:searching in 5434) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06414515 = score(doc=5434,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20502694 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.31286204 = fieldWeight in 5434, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5434)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Recently, the Library of Congress adopted the pinyin Romanization system for transcribing Chinese data in its bibliographic records. In its canonical form, pinyin aggregates Chinese "words" into single linguistic units, but pinyin entries could be constructed following either a monosyllabic or a polysyllabic pattern. Although the former is easier and less costly to implement, the latter method is potentially more beneficial for end-users, as it reduces ambiguity, and generates a much larger variety of indexable terms. The current study investigates if following the polysyllabic method improves retrieval efficiency and effectiveness in item-specific searching within online bibliographic databases. Analysis of the results revealed that aggregation of monosyllables does improve efficiency significantly (p < .05), especially during keyword searches, while effectiveness remains mainly unaffected.
-
Tennant, R.: ¬A bibliographic metadata infrastructure for the twenty-first century (2004)
0.09
0.089908004 = product of:
0.134862 = sum of:
0.09601736 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09601736 = score(doc=2845,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19731061 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.4866305 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
0.038844645 = product of:
0.07768929 = sum of:
0.07768929 = weight(_text_:22 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07768929 = score(doc=2845,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17748274 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The current library bibliographic infrastructure was constructed in the early days of computers - before the Web, XML, and a variety of other technological advances that now offer new opportunities. General requirements of a modern metadata infrastructure for libraries are identified, including such qualities as versatility, extensibility, granularity, and openness. A new kind of metadata infrastructure is then proposed that exhibits at least some of those qualities. Some key challenges that must be overcome to implement a change of this magnitude are identified.
- Date
- 9.12.2005 19:22:38
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.175-181
-
Riva, P.: Mapping MARC 21 linking entry fields to FRBR and Tillett's taxonomy of bibliographic relationships (2004)
0.09
0.08964205 = product of:
0.13446307 = sum of:
0.11386259 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 136) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11386259 = score(doc=136,freq=10.0), product of:
0.19731061 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.5770728 = fieldWeight in 136, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=136)
0.020600483 = product of:
0.041200966 = sum of:
0.041200966 = weight(_text_:22 in 136) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041200966 = score(doc=136,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17748274 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 136, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=136)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Bibliographic relationships have taken on even greater importance in the context of ongoing efforts to integrate concepts from the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) into cataloging codes and database structures. In MARC 21, the linking entry fields are a major mechanism for expressing relationships between bibliographic records. Taxonomies of bibliographic relationships have been proposed by Tillett, with an extension by Smiraglia, and in FRBR itself. The present exercise is to provide a detailed bidirectional mapping of the MARC 21 linking fields to these two schemes. The correspondence of the Tillett taxonomic divisions to the MARC categorization of the linking fields as chronological, horizontal, or vertical is examined as well. Application of the findings to MARC format development and system functionality is discussed.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Wolfram, D.: Search characteristics in different types of Web-based IR environments : are they the same? (2008)
0.09
0.08624844 = product of:
0.12937266 = sum of:
0.08401519 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 2093) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08401519 = score(doc=2093,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19731061 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.4258017 = fieldWeight in 2093, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2093)
0.04535747 = product of:
0.09071494 = sum of:
0.09071494 = weight(_text_:searching in 2093) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09071494 = score(doc=2093,freq=4.0), product of:
0.20502694 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.44245374 = fieldWeight in 2093, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2093)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Transaction logs from four different Web-based information retrieval environments (bibliographic databank, OPAC, search engine, specialized search system) were analyzed for empirical regularities in search characteristics to determine whether users engage in different behaviors in different Web-based search environments. Descriptive statistics and relative frequency distributions related to term usage, query formulation, and session duration were tabulated. The analysis revealed that there are differences in these characteristics. Users were more likely to engage in extensive searching using the OPAC and specialized search system. Surprisingly, the bibliographic databank search environment resulted in the most parsimonious searching, more similar to a general search engine. Although on the surface Web-based search facilities may appear similar, users do engage in different search behaviors.
-
Coyle, K.: Future considerations : the functional library systems record (2004)
0.08
0.08232312 = product of:
0.12348467 = sum of:
0.09601736 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09601736 = score(doc=562,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19731061 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.4866305 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.02746731 = product of:
0.05493462 = sum of:
0.05493462 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05493462 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17748274 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The paper performs a thought experiment on the concept of a record based on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records and library system functions, and concludes that if we want to develop a functional bibliographic record we need to do it within the context of a flexible, functional library systems record structure. The article suggests a new way to look at the library systems record that would allow libraries to move forward in terms of technology but also in terms of serving library users.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.166-174
-
Taniguchi, S.: Recording evidence in bibliographic records and descriptive metadata (2005)
0.08
0.08162819 = product of:
0.122442275 = sum of:
0.10184179 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 3565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10184179 = score(doc=3565,freq=8.0), product of:
0.19731061 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.5161496 = fieldWeight in 3565, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3565)
0.020600483 = product of:
0.041200966 = sum of:
0.041200966 = weight(_text_:22 in 3565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041200966 = score(doc=3565,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17748274 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3565, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3565)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- In this article recording evidence for data values in addition to the values themselves in bibliographic records and descriptive metadata is proposed, with the aim of improving the expressiveness and reliability of those records and metadata. Recorded evidence indicates why and how data values are recorded for elements. Recording the history of changes in data values is also proposed, with the aim of reinforcing recorded evidence. First, evidence that can be recorded is categorized into classes: identifiers of rules or tasks, action descriptions of them, and input and output data of them. Dates of recording values and evidence are an additional class. Then, the relative usefulness of evidence classes and also levels (i.e., the record, data element, or data value level) to which an individual evidence class is applied, is examined. Second, examples that can be viewed as recorded evidence in existing bibliographic records and current cataloging rules are shown. Third, some examples of bibliographic records and descriptive metadata with notes of evidence are demonstrated. Fourth, ways of using recorded evidence are addressed.
- Date
- 18. 6.2005 13:16:22
-
Madison, O.M.A.: ¬The IFLA Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records : international standards for bibliographic control (2000)
0.08
0.080739275 = product of:
0.121108904 = sum of:
0.103941835 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.103941835 = score(doc=187,freq=12.0), product of:
0.19731061 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.52679294 = fieldWeight in 187, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=187)
0.017167069 = product of:
0.034334138 = sum of:
0.034334138 = weight(_text_:22 in 187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034334138 = score(doc=187,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17748274 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 187, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=187)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The formal charge for the IFLA study involving international bibliography standards was to delineate the functions that are performed by the bibliographic record with respect to various media, applications, and user needs. The method used was the entity relationship analysis technique. Three groups of entities that are the key objects of interest to users of bibliographic records were defined. The primary group contains four entities: work, expression, manifestation, and item. The second group includes entities responsible for the intellectual or artistic content, production, or ownership of entities in the first group. The third group includes entities that represent concepts, objects, events, and places. In the study we identified the attributes associated with each entity and the relationships that are most important to users. The attributes and relationships were mapped to the functional requirements for bibliographic records that were defined in terms of four user tasks: to find, identify, select, and obtain. Basic requirements for national bibliographic records were recommended based on the entity analysis. The recommendations of the study are compared with two standards, AACR (Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules) and the Dublin Core, to place them into pragmatic context. The results of the study are being used in the review of the complete set of ISBDs as the initial benchmark in determining data elements for each format.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Boeuf, P. le: ¬The Impact of the FRBR model an the future revisions of the ISBDs : a challenge for the IFLA Section an Cataloging (2002)
0.08
0.079468206 = product of:
0.1192023 = sum of:
0.08486816 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 3954) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08486816 = score(doc=3954,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19731061 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.43012467 = fieldWeight in 3954, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3954)
0.034334138 = product of:
0.068668276 = sum of:
0.068668276 = weight(_text_:22 in 3954) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.068668276 = score(doc=3954,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17748274 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3954, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3954)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 30. 8.2005 9:12:22
- Source
- International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 31(2002) no.1, S.3-6
