Search (1296 results, page 1 of 65)

0.4179295 = product of:
  0.835859 = sum of:
    0.7518026 = weight(_text_:22nd in 4594) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.7518026 = score(doc=4594,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.546361 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
          0.062040545 = queryNorm
        1.376018 = fieldWeight in 4594, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4594)
    0.08405638 = weight(_text_:22 in 4594) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08405638 = score(doc=4594,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21725541 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.062040545 = queryNorm
        0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4594, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4594)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

This work has been fully updated for the 22nd edition of DDC, and is used as reference for the application of Dewey coding or as a course text in the Dewey System

Object

DDC-22

0.17302215 = product of:
  0.3460443 = sum of:
    0.2956105 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2956105 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.5259804 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.062040545 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.050433822 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.050433822 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21725541 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.062040545 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Content

Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.

Date

8. 1.2013 10:22:32

0.1507994 = product of:
  0.3015988 = sum of:
    0.2126419 = weight(_text_:22nd in 1842) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2126419 = score(doc=1842,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.546361 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
          0.062040545 = queryNorm
        0.38919666 = fieldWeight in 1842, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1842)
    0.08895691 = weight(_text_:22 in 1842) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08895691 = score(doc=1842,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.21725541 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.062040545 = queryNorm
        0.4094577 = fieldWeight in 1842, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1842)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

A system of library classification that flashed across the inquiring mind of young Melvil Louis Kossuth Dewey (known as Melvil Dewey) in 1873 is still the most popular classification scheme.. The modern library classification begins with Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC). Melvil Dewey devised DDC in 1876. DDC has is credit of 128 years of boudless success. The DDC is being taught as a practical subject throughout the world and it is being used in majority of libraries in about 150 countries. This is the result of continuous revision that 22nd Edition of DDC has been published in July 2003. No other classification scheme has published so many editions. Some welcome changes have been made in DDC 22. To reduce the Christian bias in 200 religion, the numbers 201 to 209 have been devoted to specific aspects of religion. In the previous editions these numbers were devoted to Christianity. to enhance the classifier's efficiency, Table 7 has been removed from DDC 22 and the provision of adding group of persons is made by direct use of notation already available in schedules and in notation -08 from Table 1 Standard Subdivision. The present book is an attempt to explain, with suitable examples, the salient provisions of DDC 22. The book is written in simple language so that the students may not face any difficulty in understanding what is being explained. The examples in the book are explained in a step-by-step procedure. It is hoped that this book will prove of great help and use to the library professionals in general and library and information science students in particular.

Content

1. Introduction to DDC 22 2. Major changes in DDC 22 3. Introduction to the schedules 4. Use of Table 1 : Standard Subdivisions 5. Use of Table 2 : Areas 6. Use of Table 3 : Subdivisions for the arts, for individual literatures, for specific literary forms 7. Use to Table 4 : Subdivisions of individual languages and language families 8. Use of Table 5 : Ethic and National groups 9. Use of Table 6 : Languages 10. Treatment of Groups of Persons

Object

DDC-22

0.13329455 = product of:
  0.2665891 = sum of:
    0.23019162 = weight(_text_:22nd in 129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.23019162 = score(doc=129,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.546361 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
          0.062040545 = queryNorm
        0.4213178 = fieldWeight in 129, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=129)
    0.03639748 = weight(_text_:22 in 129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03639748 = score(doc=129,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.21725541 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.062040545 = queryNorm
        0.16753313 = fieldWeight in 129, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=129)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Footnote

Rez. in: Knowledge organization 31(2004) no.2, S.112-114 (M.P. Satija) : "With nearly 130 years of eventful and checkered history, the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) is the oldest living yet thriving modern library classification. Having undergone 21 revisions, it is the most applied library classification structure all over the world. Apart from its use in libraries in more than 135 countries across six continents, many national and trade bibliographies use it for content organization. Furthermore, it is now making successful forays into the world of electronic documents and networked information. The print version of the 22nd edition was released in September 2003, two months later than the scheduled time of July 2003, and two months after the release of the electronic version, WebDewey. The period between print editions now seems settled to seven years as a matter of policy. As WebDewey, an the other hand, is updated an a quarterly basis, what really constitutes a new edition is problematic; edition is rolling, always in a flux without much fixity. The last half century, and more specifically the tenure of Benjamin A. Custer as editor (1956-1980; Editions 16-19), has been an era of structural changes in the DDC, backed by professional management and organizational planning. Custer was instrumental in not only resuscitating the system, but also in putting DDC back an the path of progress. His able successor, Dr. John P. Comaromi, edited the 20`h edition (1989) and ushered in a period of simplification and consolidation. Following the acquisition of Forest Press by OCLC in 1988, much more research has gone into making new editions of the DDC. The OCLC Office of Research has involved itself in classification research, especially in the harmonization of various knowledge classification systems and mapping of DDC numbers to subject headings, above all to make DDC capable of organizing electronic information of every sort. The acquisition of DDC by OCLC has also inaugurated an era of new products and services, along with organized marketing. DDC21 (1996) was a product of high IT, and the 22nd edition can safely be termed a child of network technology. It is indeed the first edition produced in the web environment. To stay abreast of current developments an knowledge practices, the editors relied an the Internet and electronic databases for new topics and terms. Editors and policy makes got constant feedback and suggestions via the Internet to add new features and to achieve accuracy and efficiency. In addition to the feedback and expert advice, this edition, as usual, is based an actual classification of three quarters of a million current books in the Decimal Classification Division of the Library of Congress since 1996.
Changes DDC22 is the second edition prepared by Joan S. Mitchell who took over as editor in 1993. It carries forward the policies and improvements started in DDC21, especially the onslaught an the Christian and western cultural blas in the schedules and tables. The plan for reducing Christian blas in 200 Religion, initiated in DDC21, has now been completed, with some additional provisions in 296 and 297. An outstanding change has been the abrogation of Table 7 Persons. The functions of Table 7 are now filled by using T1-08 and whatever notation is appropriate from 011-999. There are at least six places in the tables and 12 places in the schedules where the use of T7 was prescribed; what good the abolition of T7 has produced is not clear. In fact, it does make number building in some cases a bit circuitous, especially while using Table 3C. It has also resulted in the reuse of many DDC 21 numbers with new meanings. However, some numbers remain the same e.g., Social customs of artists 390.47 (both in DDC21 and DDC22). A few numbers have also become shorter in length. In compliance with the recommendations of D'Elia's survey, all works relating to directories of travel facilities such as hotels, lodges, Motels, inns, have been shifted to 910.46 and to 913/919 whereas 647.94 continues to be in place for general information about hotels. A common practice in previous editions, that is full class or extensive revisions (phoenix schedules), appear to have been discontinued in the preparation of DDC22. But minor changes are numerous. There are more than one thousand relocations and discontiuations of class numbers. Some 40 numbers have been reused. ... However, all these changes are not those projected as slated changes for DDC22 in the DDC21 (1996), namely in 520 Astronomy, 355-359 Military science, 636-639 Animal husbandry and 690 Buildings. Obviously the switch over to the DDC 22 will put less strain an libraries. There has been considerable improvement in the manual, now shifted to volume 1 of the print edition (pp. 1-182). Notes in the manual have been shortened by removing redundant information and by dividing them into smaller sections. Some information from the manual has been transferred to the schedules and tables, in the form of notes. The manual is now clearer and easier to read. Flow Charts, built-in numbers, and see also references should help classifiers achieve greater consistency. The relative index has been beefed up. With its 928 pages, it is 333 pages longer than the previous one, including new built-in numbers and many additional terms. The entry vocabulary is wide-based and current. DDC 22, the first edition of this millennium, has kept pace with the fast changing information environment to map and organize it squarely. To quote our friends at OCLC: knowledge is a big world, and they have organized it."

Issue

22nd ed.

Object

DDC-22

0.09853683 = product of:
  0.3941473 = sum of:
    0.3941473 = weight(_text_:3a in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.3941473 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.5259804 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.062040545 = queryNorm
        0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Content

Vgl. auch: https://studylibde.com/doc/13053640/richard-schrodt. Vgl. auch: http%3A%2F%2Fwww.univie.ac.at%2FGermanistik%2Fschrodt%2Fvorlesung%2Fwissenschaftssprache.doc&usg=AOvVaw1lDLDR6NFf1W0-oC9mEUJf.

0.08621973 = product of:
  0.3448789 = sum of:
    0.3448789 = weight(_text_:3a in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.3448789 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.5259804 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.062040545 = queryNorm
        0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Content

Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5386707&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D5386707.

0.08406414 = product of:
  0.33625656 = sum of:
    0.33625656 = weight(_text_:object's in 194) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.33625656 = score(doc=194,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.61451954 = queryWeight, product of:
          9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
          0.062040545 = queryNorm
        0.54718614 = fieldWeight in 194, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=194)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

In the first part of this article the author defines the n-overlap vector whose coordinates consist of the fraction of the objects (e.g., books, N-grams, etc.) that belong to 1, 2, , n sets (more generally: families) (e.g., libraries, databases, etc.). With the aid of the Lorenz concentration theory, a theory of n-overlap similarity is conceived together with corresponding measures, such as the generalized Jaccard index (generalizing the well-known Jaccard index in case n 5 2). Next, the distributional form of the n-overlap vector is determined assuming certain distributions of the object's and of the set (family) sizes. In this section the decreasing power law and decreasing exponential distribution is explained for the n-overlap vector. Both item (token) n-overlap and source (type) n-overlap are studied. The n-overlap properties of objects indexed by a hierarchical system (e.g., books indexed by numbers from a UDC or Dewey system or by N-grams) are presented in the final section. The author shows how the results given in the previous section can be applied as well as how the Lorenz order of the n-overlap vector is respected by an increase or a decrease of the level of refinement in the hierarchical system (e.g., the value N in N-grams).

0.07974071 = product of:
  0.31896284 = sum of:
    0.31896284 = weight(_text_:22nd in 706) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.31896284 = score(doc=706,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.546361 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
          0.062040545 = queryNorm
        0.583795 = fieldWeight in 706, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=706)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Although Indonesian libraries have been using Dewey Decimal Classification for more than half century, since 1952 until present times, from 15th through 22nd editions still many Indonesian librarians and users complained on certain DDC notation which they thought didn't reflect the true condition of Indonesia as well as the real needs of the users. This paper proposed some modification and corrections for DDC notations especially those notations on languages in Indonesia including Bahasa Indonesia, geographical and historical period. All those modifications, corrections and expansions were based on the languages map of Indonesia, Indonesian geographical division while historical period were based on Indonesian presidents' administration, from 1945 until present time. It is hoped that such modifications will yield better access to Indonesian-related-materials.

0.076957636 = product of:
  0.15391527 = sum of:
    0.13290118 = weight(_text_:22nd in 5144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13290118 = score(doc=5144,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.546361 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
          0.062040545 = queryNorm
        0.24324791 = fieldWeight in 5144, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=5144)
    0.021014094 = weight(_text_:22 in 5144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021014094 = score(doc=5144,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21725541 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.062040545 = queryNorm
        0.09672529 = fieldWeight in 5144, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=5144)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Content

Dem Grundsatzreferat folgte ein Sachstandsbericht: Stefan Wolf (BSZ Konstanz) sprach über "Neues zur Sacherschließung im Südwestverbund". Er erinnerte an die Übernahme der Sacherschließungsdaten aus dem Bibliotheksverbund Bayern 2003, an die Übernahme von DDC-Notationen aus dem Gemeinsamen Bibliotheksverbund 2004 und an den Beginn der Arbeit an der RVK-Normdatei im Jahr 2005. Aus der Fülle von angebotenem Material sei hier darauf verwiesen, dass der Südwestverbund inzwischen 25 Prozent seines Bestandes mit Schlagwörtern gemäß RSWK und Schlagwortnormdatei sowie 22 Prozent seines Bestandes mit Notationen gemäß RVK, aber auch DDC bzw. LCC erschlossen hat. Seit Dezember 2005 ist dominierendes Arbeitsthema die Migration zu PICA. Danach berichtete Dipl.-Math. Andreas Neumann (Karlsruhe) über RecommenderSysteme auf dem Hintergrund der Arbeit an der UB Karlsruhe. So konnte u.a. dank des Einsatzes dieser Expertensysteme festgestellt werden, dass 8o Prozent der Anfragen auf 14 Prozent des Bestandes gerichtet sind. Ein weiterer Arbeitsbericht wurde von Wladimir Rudyuk (Kiew) vorgelegt: Kriterien des Klassifizierens auf Dokumentebene im elektronischen Rechtsverkehr. Hier wurde die Brücke zur Erschließung in Archiven geschlagen und festgestellt, dass angesichts der vorhandenen Fülle von Einzellösungen erst noch Kriterien für institutionenübergreifende Klassifizierung zu erarbeiten sind. Der folgende Vortrag "Bibliometrische Anwendungen. Beispiel: Datenbankvergleiche" von Dirk Tunger (Jülich) erwies an einer Menge von Material die Bedeutung bibliometrischer Arbeit. Verglichen wurden dabei SCI und SCOPUS, wobei sich unterschiedliche Akzentsetzungen in der Erschließung und Unterschiede im Datenmaterial zeigten. Hervorstechendes Ergebnis der Untersuchung ist, dass die Bibliometrie nicht zur Qualitätsmessung geeignet ist, sondern zur Wahrnehmung von Publikationen. Dr. Hans-J. Hermes sprach danach über: Auch ein Job des Fachreferenten: ,,Titelfrüherkennung" - kann Klassifikation dabei helfen? Hier wurden am Beispiel der Recherche von Titeln mit dem "Publikationsjahr" 2007 (und folgende!) die Grenzen der Erschließung gezeigt.
Den zweiten Tag der Jahrestagung begann Dr. Bernd Lorenz mit einem kurzen Literaturauswahlbericht. Zunächst gab er zwei allgemeine Hinweise: - Die Briefe zur Klassifikation Nr. 58, Nov. 2005 S. 8 f. enthalten einen Bericht über die AG DK während der GfKl-Tagung Magdeburg 2005. - Gemäß den "Zehn Punkten von Cottbus 2003" wird Frau Dr. Federica Paradisi ein Referat halten über "Applications of the DDC in Italy". Beim Literaturauswahlbericht wurden folgende Titel genannt: - Scott, Mona L.: Dewey Decimal Classification, 22nd edition: a study manual and number building guide (Westport/CT, 2005; XI, 348 S.) besonders S. 7 (offiziöser Text!) [vgl. S. 8: Hier spricht die Autorin sogar vom "wisdom" of the Editorial Policy Committee!!] - Bowman, J.H.: Essential Dewey. (New York, 2005; 150 S.)(kommentierender Text mit Übungen) [gut strukturiert; Basis für ein grundsätzliches Verständnis.] - Heiner-Freiling, Magda; Landry, Patrice: Die Verwendung der Dewey-Dezimalklassifikation (DDC) für die Organisation von Nationalbibliographien: die Schweiz und Deutschland/Österreich (IFLA Oslo, 2005,1.8.2005 (2. Fassung der Übersetzung), 1o S.) [besonders S. 3, 6/8 (DDC Deutsch)] Die knappen Berichte von Anwenderbibliotheken skizzieren einen Gebrauch ohne Kooperation im ohnehin sehr reduzierten Anwenderbereich der UDK in Deutschland. Die ETH Zürich hält ihre UDK-Adaption aktuell und koordiniert in gewisser Weise den Schweizer Anwenderkreis von ca. einem Dutzend kleinerer Bibliotheken. Hingewiesen wurde auf eine kleine Dewey-Ausstellung, die dankenswerterweise durch Hilfe und Initiative von Frau Dr. Margit Sandner (UB Wien) vor dem Besprechungsraum plaziert werden konnte. Sie kann bei Interesse ausgeliehen werden. Die AG DK bestimmte dann nach dem Rücktritt von Frau Rothe (Bibliothek der HTWK Leipzig) im Zusammenhang mit ihrer bevorstehenden Pensionierung, Frau Dr. Monika Lösse (DDB Leipzig) und Herrn Dr. Pika (ETH Zürich) zu neuen stellvertretenden Vorsitzenden.

0.076957636 = product of:
  0.15391527 = sum of:
    0.13290118 = weight(_text_:22nd in 461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13290118 = score(doc=461,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.546361 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
          0.062040545 = queryNorm
        0.24324791 = fieldWeight in 461, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=461)
    0.021014094 = weight(_text_:22 in 461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021014094 = score(doc=461,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21725541 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.062040545 = queryNorm
        0.09672529 = fieldWeight in 461, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=461)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Content

Dem Grundsatzreferat folgte ein Sachstandsbericht: Stefan Wolf (BSZ Konstanz) sprach über "Neues zur Sacherschließung im Südwestverbund". Er erinnerte an die Übernahme der Sacherschließungsdaten aus dem Bibliotheksverbund Bayern 2003, an die Übernahme von DDC-Notationen aus dem Gemeinsamen Bibliotheksverbund 2004 und an den Beginn der Arbeit an der RVK-Normdatei im Jahr 2005. Aus der Fülle von angebotenem Material sei hier darauf verwiesen, dass der Südwestverbund inzwischen 25 Prozent seines Bestandes mit Schlagwörtern gemäß RSWK und Schlagwortnormdatei sowie 22 Prozent seines Bestandes mit Notationen gemäß RVK, aber auch DDC bzw. LCC erschlossen hat. Seit Dezember 2005 ist dominierendes Arbeitsthema die Migration zu PICA. Danach berichtete Dipl.-Math. Andreas Neumann (Karlsruhe) über RecommenderSysteme auf dem Hintergrund der Arbeit an der UB Karlsruhe. So konnte u.a. dank des Einsatzes dieser Expertensysteme festgestellt werden, dass 8o Prozent der Anfragen auf 14 Prozent des Bestandes gerichtet sind. Ein weiterer Arbeitsbericht wurde von Wladimir Rudyuk (Kiew) vorgelegt: Kriterien des Klassifizierens auf Dokumentebene im elektronischen Rechtsverkehr. Hier wurde die Brücke zur Erschließung in Archiven geschlagen und festgestellt, dass angesichts der vorhandenen Fülle von Einzellösungen erst noch Kriterien für institutionenübergreifende Klassifizierung zu erarbeiten sind. Der folgende Vortrag "Bibliometrische Anwendungen. Beispiel: Datenbankvergleiche" von Dirk Tunger (Jülich) erwies an einer Menge von Material die Bedeutung bibliometrischer Arbeit. Verglichen wurden dabei SCI und SCOPUS, wobei sich unterschiedliche Akzentsetzungen in der Erschließung und Unterschiede im Datenmaterial zeigten. Hervorstechendes Ergebnis der Untersuchung ist, dass die Bibliometrie nicht zur Qualitätsmessung geeignet ist, sondern zur Wahrnehmung von Publikationen. Dr. Hans-J. Hermes sprach danach über: Auch ein Job des Fachreferenten: ,,Titelfrüherkennung" - kann Klassifikation dabei helfen? Hier wurden am Beispiel der Recherche von Titeln mit dem "Publikationsjahr" 2007 (und folgende!) die Grenzen der Erschließung gezeigt.
Den zweiten Tag der Jahrestagung begann Dr. Bernd Lorenz mit einem kurzen Literaturauswahlbericht. Zunächst gab er zwei allgemeine Hinweise: - Die Briefe zur Klassifikation Nr. 58, Nov. 2005 S. 8 f. enthalten einen Bericht über die AG DK während der GfKl-Tagung Magdeburg 2005. - Gemäß den "Zehn Punkten von Cottbus 2003" wird Frau Dr. Federica Paradisi ein Referat halten über "Applications of the DDC in Italy". Beim Literaturauswahlbericht wurden folgende Titel genannt: - Scott, Mona L.: Dewey Decimal Classification, 22nd edition: a study manual and number building guide (Westport/CT, 2005; XI, 348 S.) besonders S. 7 (offiziöser Text!) [vgl. S. 8: Hier spricht die Autorin sogar vom "wisdom" of the Editorial Policy Committee!!] - Bowman, J.H.: Essential Dewey. (New York, 2005; 150 S.)(kommentierender Text mit Übungen) [gut strukturiert; Basis für ein grundsätzliches Verständnis.] - Heiner-Freiling, Magda; Landry, Patrice: Die Verwendung der Dewey-Dezimalklassifikation (DDC) für die Organisation von Nationalbibliographien: die Schweiz und Deutschland/Österreich (IFLA Oslo, 2005,1.8.2005 (2. Fassung der Übersetzung), 1o S.) [besonders S. 3, 6/8 (DDC Deutsch)] Die knappen Berichte von Anwenderbibliotheken skizzieren einen Gebrauch ohne Kooperation im ohnehin sehr reduzierten Anwenderbereich der UDK in Deutschland. Die ETH Zürich hält ihre UDK-Adaption aktuell und koordiniert in gewisser Weise den Schweizer Anwenderkreis von ca. einem Dutzend kleinerer Bibliotheken. Hingewiesen wurde auf eine kleine Dewey-Ausstellung, die dankenswerterweise durch Hilfe und Initiative von Frau Dr. Margit Sandner (UB Wien) vor dem Besprechungsraum plaziert werden konnte. Sie kann bei Interesse ausgeliehen werden. Die AG DK bestimmte dann nach dem Rücktritt von Frau Rothe (Bibliothek der HTWK Leipzig) im Zusammenhang mit ihrer bevorstehenden Pensionierung, Frau Dr. Monika Lösse (DDB Leipzig) und Herrn Dr. Pika (ETH Zürich) zu neuen stellvertretenden Vorsitzenden.

0.07390262 = product of:
  0.2956105 = sum of:
    0.2956105 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2956105 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.5259804 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.062040545 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Footnote

Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?reload=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4755313%2F4755314%2F04755480.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4755480&authDecision=-203.

0.06158552 = product of:
  0.24634208 = sum of:
    0.24634208 = weight(_text_:3a in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.24634208 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.5259804 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.062040545 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Politische Meinung. 381(2001) Nr.1, S.65-74 [https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dgfe.de%2Ffileadmin%2FOrdnerRedakteure%2FSektionen%2FSek02_AEW%2FKWF%2FPublikationen_Reihe_1989-2003%2FBand_17%2FBd_17_1994_355-406_A.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2KcbRsHy5UQ9QRIUyuOLNi]

0.06158552 = product of:
  0.24634208 = sum of:
    0.24634208 = weight(_text_:3a in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.24634208 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.5259804 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.062040545 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Content

Vgl.: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Piaget-%E2%80%99-s-Constructivism-%2C-Papert-%E2%80%99-s-%3A-What-%E2%80%99-s-Ackermann/89cbcc1e740a4591443ff4765a6ae8df0fdf5554. Darunter weitere Hinweise auf verwandte Beiträge. Auch unter: Learning Group Publication 5(2001) no.3, S.438.

0.056742713 = product of:
  0.113485426 = sum of:
    0.10087697 = weight(_text_:object's in 4344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10087697 = score(doc=4344,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.61451954 = queryWeight, product of:
          9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
          0.062040545 = queryNorm
        0.16415584 = fieldWeight in 4344, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01171875 = fieldNorm(doc=4344)
    0.0126084555 = weight(_text_:22 in 4344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0126084555 = score(doc=4344,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21725541 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.062040545 = queryNorm
        0.058035173 = fieldWeight in 4344, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01171875 = fieldNorm(doc=4344)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Footnote

Chapter 2 (Technology and People) focuses an several theories of technological acceptance and diffusion. Unfortunately, Bruce's presentation is somewhat confusing as he moves from one theory to next, never quite connecting them into a logical sequence or coherent whole. Two theories are of particular interest to Bruce: the Theory of Diffusion of Innovations and the Theory of Planned Behavior. The Theory of Diffusion of Innovations is an "information-centric view of technology acceptance" in which technology adopters are placed in the information flows of society from which they learn about innovations and "drive innovation adoption decisions" (p. 20). The Theory of Planned Behavior maintains that the "performance of a behavior is a joint function of intentions and perceived behavioral control" (i.e., how muck control a person thinks they have) (pp. 22-23). Bruce combines these two theories to form the basis for the Technology Acceptance Model. This model posits that "an individual's acceptance of information technology is based an beliefs, attitudes, intentions, and behaviors" (p. 24). In all these theories and models echoes a recurring theme: "individual perceptions of the innovation or technology are critical" in terms of both its characteristics and its use (pp. 24-25). From these, in turn, Bruce derives a predictive theory of the role personal perceptions play in technology adoption: Personal Innovativeness of Information Technology Adoption (PIITA). Personal inventiveness is defined as "the willingness of an individual to try out any new information technology" (p. 26). In general, the PIITA theory predicts that information technology will be adopted by individuals that have a greater exposure to mass media, rely less an the evaluation of information technology by others, exhibit a greater ability to cope with uncertainty and take risks, and requires a less positive perception of an information technology prior to its adoption. Chapter 3 (A Focus an Usings) introduces the User-Centered Paradigm (UCP). The UCP is characteristic of the shift of emphasis from technology to users as the driving force behind technology and research agendas for Internet development [for a dissenting view, see Andrew Dillion's (2003) challenge to the utility of user-centerness for design guidance]. It entails the "broad acceptance of the user-oriented perspective across a range of disciplines and professional fields," such as business, education, cognitive engineering, and information science (p. 34).
The UCP's effect an business practices is focused mainly in the management and marketing areas. Marketing experienced a shift from "product-oriented operations" with its focus an "selling the products' features" and customer contact only at the point of sale toward more service-Centered business practice ("customer Jemand orientation") and the development of one-to-one customer relationships (pp. 35-36). For management, the adoption of the UCP caused a shift from "mechanistic, bureaucratic, top-down organizational structures" to "flatter, inclusive, and participative" ones (p. 37). In education, practice shifted from the teachercentered model where the "teacher is responsible for and makes all the decisions related to the learning environment" to a learnercentered model where the student is "responsible for his or her own learning" and the teacher focuses an "matching learning events to the individual skills, aptitudes, and interests of the individual learner" (pp. 38-39). Cognitive engineering saw the rise of "user-Centered design" and human factors that were concerned with applying "scientific knowledge of humans to the design of man-machine interface systems" (p. 44). The UCP had a great effect an Information Science in the "design of information systems" (p. 47). Previous to UCP's explicit proposed by Brenda Dervin and M. Nilan in 1986, systems design was dominated by the "physical of system oriented paradigm" (p. 48). The physical paradigm held a positivistic and materialistic view of technology and (passive) human interaction as exemplified by the 1953 Cranfield tests of information retrieval mechanisms. Instead, the UCP focuses an "users rather than systems" by making the perceptions of individual information users the "centerpiece consideration for information service and system design" (pp. 47-48). Bruce briefly touches an the various schools of thought within user-oriented paradigm, such as the cognitive/self studies approach with its emphasis is an an individual's knowledge structures or model of the world [e.g., Belkin (1990)], the cognitve/context studies approach that focuses an "context in explaining variations in information behavior" [e.g., Savolainen (1995) and Dervin's (1999) sensemaking], and the social constructionism/discourse analytic theory with its focus an that language, not mental/knowledge constructs, as the primary shaper of the world as a system of intersubjective meanings [e.g., Talja 1996], (pp. 53-54). Drawing from the rich tradition of user oriented research, Bruce attempts to gain a metatheoretical understanding of the Internet as a phenomena by combining Dervin's (1996) "micromoments of human usings" with the French philosopher Bruno Latour's (1999) "conception of Circulating reference" to form what 1 term the Metatheory of Circulating Usings (pp. ix, 56, 60). According to Bruce, Latour's concept is designed to bridge "the gap between mind and object" by engaging in a "succession of finely grained transformations that construct and transfer truth about the object" through a chain of "microtranslations" from "matter to form," thereby connecting mind and object (p. 56). The connection works as long as the chain remains unbroken. The nature of this chain of "information producing translations" are such that as one moves away from the object, one experiences a "reduction" of the object's "locality, particularity, materiality, multiplicity and continuity," while simultaneously gaining the "amplification" of its "compatibility, standardization, text, calculation, circulation, and relative universality" (p. 57).

0.049268413 = product of:
  0.19707365 = sum of:
    0.19707365 = weight(_text_:3a in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19707365 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.5259804 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.062040545 = queryNorm
        0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Content

Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F1627&ei=tAtYUYrBNoHKtQb3l4GYBw&usg=AFQjCNHeaxKkKU3-u54LWxMNYGXaaDLCGw&sig2=8WykXWQoDKjDSdGtAakH2Q&bvm=bv.44442042,d.Yms.

0.047549464 = product of:
  0.19019786 = sum of:
    0.19019786 = weight(_text_:22 in 4362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19019786 = score(doc=4362,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.21725541 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.062040545 = queryNorm
        0.8754574 = fieldWeight in 4362, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4362)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

22. 1.2000 19:22:27

0.047549464 = product of:
  0.19019786 = sum of:
    0.19019786 = weight(_text_:22 in 3211) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19019786 = score(doc=3211,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.21725541 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.062040545 = queryNorm
        0.8754574 = fieldWeight in 3211, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3211)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

22. 2.2005 9:16:22

0.047549464 = product of:
  0.19019786 = sum of:
    0.19019786 = weight(_text_:22 in 4109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19019786 = score(doc=4109,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.21725541 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.062040545 = queryNorm
        0.8754574 = fieldWeight in 4109, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4109)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

14. 8.2005 14:22:22

0.043676972 = product of:
  0.17470789 = sum of:
    0.17470789 = weight(_text_:22 in 1339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17470789 = score(doc=1339,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.21725541 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.062040545 = queryNorm
        0.804159 = fieldWeight in 1339, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1339)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

22. 2.2003 17:25:39
22. 2.2003 18:16:22

0.04160578 = product of:
  0.16642313 = sum of:
    0.16642313 = weight(_text_:22 in 502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.16642313 = score(doc=502,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.21725541 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.062040545 = queryNorm
        0.76602525 = fieldWeight in 502, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=502)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

3. 5.1997 8:44:22
22. 9.2003 10:02:00