Search (1372 results, page 1 of 69)

  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Golderman, G.M.; Connolly, B.: Between the book covers : going beyond OPAC keyword searching with the deep linking capabilities of Google Scholar and Google Book Search (2004/05) 0.15 
    0.14994535 = product of:
  0.2998907 = sum of:
    0.2998907 = sum of:
      0.26605716 = weight(_text_:scholar in 731) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.26605716 = score(doc=731,freq=10.0), product of:
          0.327981 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.5669885 = idf(docFreq=168, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049943898 = queryNorm
          0.8111969 = fieldWeight in 731, product of:
            3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
              10.0 = termFreq=10.0
            6.5669885 = idf(docFreq=168, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=731)
      0.033833545 = weight(_text_:22 in 731) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.033833545 = score(doc=731,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17489502 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049943898 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 731, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=731)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    One finding of the 2006 OCLC study of College Students' Perceptions of Libraries and Information Resources was that students expressed equal levels of trust in libraries and search engines when it came to meeting their information needs in a way that they felt was authoritative. Seeking to incorporate this insight into our own instructional methodology, Schaffer Library at Union College has attempted to engineer a shift from Google to Google Scholar among our student users by representing Scholar as a viable adjunct to the catalog and to snore traditional electronic resources. By attempting to engage student researchers on their own terms, we have discovered that most of them react enthusiastically to the revelation that the Google they think they know so well is, it turns out, a multifaceted resource that is capable of delivering the sort of scholarly information that will meet with their professors' approval. Specifically, this article focuses on the fact that many Google Scholar searches link hack to our own Web catalog where they identify useful book titles that direct OPAC keyword searches have missed.
    Date
    2.12.2007 19:39:22
    Object
    Google Scholar
  2. Arendt, J.: Imperfect tools : Google Scholar vs. traditional commercial library databases (2008) 0.12 
    0.12365221 = product of:
  0.24730442 = sum of:
    0.24730442 = product of:
      0.49460885 = sum of:
        0.49460885 = weight(_text_:scholar in 6802) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.49460885 = score(doc=6802,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.327981 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.5669885 = idf(docFreq=168, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049943898 = queryNorm
            1.5080411 = fieldWeight in 6802, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              6.5669885 = idf(docFreq=168, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6802)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Should Google Scholar replace subscription databases?
    Object
    Google Scholar
  3. Noruzi, A.: Google Scholar : the new generation of citation indexes (2005) 0.11 
    0.10708594 = product of:
  0.21417189 = sum of:
    0.21417189 = product of:
      0.42834377 = sum of:
        0.42834377 = weight(_text_:scholar in 5061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.42834377 = score(doc=5061,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.327981 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.5669885 = idf(docFreq=168, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049943898 = queryNorm
            1.3060018 = fieldWeight in 5061, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              6.5669885 = idf(docFreq=168, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5061)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Google Scholar (http://scholar.google.com) provides a new method of locating potentially relevant articles on a given subject by identifying subsequent articles that cite a previously published article. An important feature of Google Scholar is that researchers can use it to trace interconnections among authors citing articles on the same topic and to determine the frequency with which others cite a specific article, as it has a "cited by" feature. This study begins with an overview of how to use Google Scholar for citation analysis and identifies advanced search techniques not well documented by Google Scholar. This study also compares the citation counts provided by Web of Science and Google Scholar for articles in the field of "Webometrics." It makes several suggestions for improving Google Scholar. Finally, it concludes that Google Scholar provides a free alternative or complement to other citation indexes.
    Object
    Google Scholar
  4. Lewandowski, D.: Nachweis deutschsprachiger bibliotheks- und informationswissenschaftlicher Aufsätze in Google Scholar (2007) 0.10 
    0.10200785 = product of:
  0.2040157 = sum of:
    0.2040157 = product of:
      0.4080314 = sum of:
        0.4080314 = weight(_text_:scholar in 284) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.4080314 = score(doc=284,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.327981 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.5669885 = idf(docFreq=168, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049943898 = queryNorm
            1.2440703 = fieldWeight in 284, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              6.5669885 = idf(docFreq=168, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=284)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    In dieser Untersuchung werden die Aufsätze der Jahre 2004 bis 2006 aus den acht wichtigsten deutschsprachigen Zeitschriften des Bibliotheks- und Informationswesens auf ihre Verfügbarkeit in Google Scholar hin untersucht. Dabei zeigt sich, dass Google Scholar keinen vollständigen Nachweis der Artikel bieten kann und sich daher nicht als Ersatz für bibliographische Datenbanken eignet. Google Scholar macht einen Teil der Volltexte direkt verfügbar und eignet sich insofern für einen schnellen und problemlosen Zugang zum Volltext, der traditionelle Wege wie die Bibliothek bzw. die Fernleihe umgeht. Für das Fach Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft bietet Google Scholar insgesamt die Chance, seine Inhalte auch über die Fachgrenzen hinaus bekannt zu machen.
    Object
    Google Scholar
  5. Callicott, B.; Vaughn, D.: Google Scholar vs. Library Scholar : testing the performance of Schoogle (2005) 0.10 
    0.10200785 = product of:
  0.2040157 = sum of:
    0.2040157 = product of:
      0.4080314 = sum of:
        0.4080314 = weight(_text_:scholar in 357) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.4080314 = score(doc=357,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.327981 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.5669885 = idf(docFreq=168, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049943898 = queryNorm
            1.2440703 = fieldWeight in 357, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              6.5669885 = idf(docFreq=168, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=357)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    How does the content of Google Scholar, a.k.a. "Schoogle, compare to that of subscription databases and the library catalog? Five sample research topics indigenous to undergraduate libraries were searched in Google Scholar, the College of Charleston online catalog, EBSCO's Academic Search Premier database, and a subject-specific subscription database. Points of consideration included document type, availability of full-text materials, local availability of materials (either in print or online), and relevance of materials to the research topics. Results showed that Google Scholar, while a substantive supplementary research tool, does not provide the same quality in terms of relevance for many research topics.
    Object
    Google Scholar
  6. Donlan, R.; Cooke, R.: Running with the devil : accessing library-licensed full text holdings through Google Scholar (2005) 0.10 
    0.10200785 = product of:
  0.2040157 = sum of:
    0.2040157 = product of:
      0.4080314 = sum of:
        0.4080314 = weight(_text_:scholar in 363) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.4080314 = score(doc=363,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.327981 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.5669885 = idf(docFreq=168, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049943898 = queryNorm
            1.2440703 = fieldWeight in 363, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              6.5669885 = idf(docFreq=168, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=363)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Linking full-text proprietary databases with Google Scholar revealed three significant limitations in terms of precision (no subject heading search), transparency (no listing of information sources), and visibility (Google Scholar details are hard to find). Google Scholar is not a "one stop shopping" search engine that retrieves all relevant data from a library's licensed content. Despite these shortcomings, Google Scholar is a worthwhile search option for students, which may steer them away from Web resources, and towards the library's catalog and databases.
    Object
    Google Scholar
  7. Mukherjee, B.: Do open-access journals in library and information science have any scholarly impact? : a bibliometric study of selected open-access journals using Google Scholar (2009) 0.10 
    0.101051435 = product of:
  0.20210287 = sum of:
    0.20210287 = sum of:
      0.16826932 = weight(_text_:scholar in 2745) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.16826932 = score(doc=2745,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.327981 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.5669885 = idf(docFreq=168, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049943898 = queryNorm
          0.51304597 = fieldWeight in 2745, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            6.5669885 = idf(docFreq=168, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2745)
      0.033833545 = weight(_text_:22 in 2745) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.033833545 = score(doc=2745,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17489502 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049943898 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2745, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2745)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 3.2009 17:54:59
    Object
    Google Scholar
  8. Bosman, J.; Sieverts, E.: Wetenschappelijk googlelen eenvoudiger en beter dan ooit? (2005) 0.10 
    0.1009616 = product of:
  0.2019232 = sum of:
    0.2019232 = product of:
      0.4038464 = sum of:
        0.4038464 = weight(_text_:scholar in 7091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.4038464 = score(doc=7091,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.327981 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.5669885 = idf(docFreq=168, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049943898 = queryNorm
            1.2313104 = fieldWeight in 7091, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.5669885 = idf(docFreq=168, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7091)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Übers. d. Titels: Scientific googling, simpler and better than ever?: Google Scholar
    Object
    Google Scholar
  9. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.10 
    0.09962428 = sum of:
  0.079324156 = product of:
    0.23797245 = sum of:
      0.23797245 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.23797245 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.42342493 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049943898 = queryNorm
          0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.020300126 = product of:
    0.04060025 = sum of:
      0.04060025 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04060025 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17489502 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049943898 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  10. ExLibris: OpenURL links to SFX in Google Scholar (2005) 0.10 
    0.09865664 = product of:
  0.19731328 = sum of:
    0.19731328 = product of:
      0.39462656 = sum of:
        0.39462656 = weight(_text_:scholar in 3994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.39462656 = score(doc=3994,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.327981 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.5669885 = idf(docFreq=168, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049943898 = queryNorm
            1.2031995 = fieldWeight in 3994, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              6.5669885 = idf(docFreq=168, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3994)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    "Ex Libris announced the immediate availability of a new set of tools to enable Google(TM) Scholar to display OpenURL links to SFX®. With these tools, institutions with the award-winning SFX link server can register with Google Scholar to have their SFX links displayed in Google Scholar search results. Once registered, the institutions' electronic library holdings are made available to Google Scholar so that the Google Scholar search results will clearly indicate when electronic full text is available. The new SFX tools result from recent work undertaken by Ex Libris in collaboration with both Google and a number of SFX customers who participated in the Google Scholar OpenURL pilot project. By tying local content into Google Scholar, the new tools address research needs expressed by many SFX customers. For libraries that do not yet enjoy the benefits of a link server, Ex Libris is pleased to announce ScholarSFX(TM). This groundbreaking service enables libraries - for free - to create customized links based an their institution's electronic journal holdings and display these links in Google Scholar search results. Patrons affiliated with the institution will then be able to link from the Google Scholar results to articles that are available through local institutional subscriptions or for free an the Web. ScholarSFX includes links to thousands of such free journals. - For additional information an SFX for Google Scholar and ScholarSFX, please visit: www.exlibrisgroup.com/scholar_sfx.htm"
  11. Cathcart, R.; Roberts, A.: Evaluating Google Scholar as a tool for information literacy (2005) 0.10 
    0.0951875 = product of:
  0.190375 = sum of:
    0.190375 = product of:
      0.38075 = sum of:
        0.38075 = weight(_text_:scholar in 365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.38075 = score(doc=365,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.327981 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.5669885 = idf(docFreq=168, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049943898 = queryNorm
            1.1608905 = fieldWeight in 365, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              6.5669885 = idf(docFreq=168, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=365)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    There are a growing number of articles on the juncture of Google Scholar and libraries; this article seeks to address the ability of this resource to meet the information needs of students and researchers using the ACRL Information Literacy Standards. Each standard is applied to Google Scholar in this examination, and recommendations for how librarians might respond are offered.
    Object
    Google Scholar
  12. Harzing, A.-W.; Wal, R. van der: ¬A Google Scholar h-index for journals : an alternative metric to measure journal impact in economics and business (2009) 0.10 
    0.0951875 = product of:
  0.190375 = sum of:
    0.190375 = product of:
      0.38075 = sum of:
        0.38075 = weight(_text_:scholar in 2630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.38075 = score(doc=2630,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.327981 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.5669885 = idf(docFreq=168, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049943898 = queryNorm
            1.1608905 = fieldWeight in 2630, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              6.5669885 = idf(docFreq=168, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2630)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    We propose a new data source (Google Scholar) and metric (Hirsch's h-index) to assess journal impact in the field of economics and business. A systematic comparison between the Google Scholar h-index and the ISI Journal Impact Factor for a sample of 838 journals in economics and business shows that the former provides a more accurate and comprehensive measure of journal impact.
    Object
    Google Scholar
  13. Handreck, F.; Mönnich, M.W.: Google Scholar als Alternative zu wissenschaftlichen Fachdatenbanken (2008) 0.09 
    0.09312001 = product of:
  0.18624002 = sum of:
    0.18624002 = product of:
      0.37248003 = sum of:
        0.37248003 = weight(_text_:scholar in 3626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.37248003 = score(doc=3626,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.327981 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.5669885 = idf(docFreq=168, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049943898 = queryNorm
            1.1356757 = fieldWeight in 3626, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              6.5669885 = idf(docFreq=168, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3626)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Seit dem Start von Google Scholar als einem neuartigen Suchdienst für wissenschaftliche Literatur (in der englischen Version im November 2004 und in der deutschen Version im April 2006), sorgt dieser Dienst für Gesprächsstoff unter Fachleuten. In diesem Beitrag wird nicht untersucht, wie vollständig Zeitschriftenlisten von Fachdatenbanken oder Verlagen und die Indexierung von Open Access Hochschulschriftenservern durch Google Scholar abgedeckt werden und auch das Pageranking und die Indexierungshäufigkeit von Google Scholar stehen nicht im Fokus, sondern es geht um die praktische Anwendung dieses Suchdienstes bei wissenschaftlichen Literaturrecherchen. Wie müssen Suchanfragen formuliert werden, um thematisch passende Ergebnisse zu bekommen und wie viele relevante Ergebnisse gibt es innerhalb dieser Treffermengen.
    Object
    Google Scholar
  14. Nicholas, D.; Huntington, P.; Jamali, H.R.; Rowlands, I.; Fieldhouse, M.: Student digital information-seeking behaviour in context (2009) 0.09 
    0.09169075 = product of:
  0.1833815 = sum of:
    0.1833815 = sum of:
      0.14278124 = weight(_text_:scholar in 2680) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.14278124 = score(doc=2680,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.327981 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.5669885 = idf(docFreq=168, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049943898 = queryNorm
          0.4353339 = fieldWeight in 2680, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.5669885 = idf(docFreq=168, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2680)
      0.04060025 = weight(_text_:22 in 2680) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04060025 = score(doc=2680,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17489502 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049943898 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2680, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2680)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Purpose - This study provides evidence on the actual information-seeking behaviour of students in a digital scholarly environment, not what they thought they did. It also compares student information-seeking behaviour with that of other academic communities, and, in some cases, for practitioners. Design/methodology/approach - Data were gathered as part of CIBER's ongoing Virtual Scholar programme. In particular log data from two digital journals libraries, Blackwell Synergy and OhioLINK, and one e-book collection (Oxford Scholarship Online) are utilized. Findings - The study showed a distinctive form of information-seeking behaviour associated with students and differences between them and other members of the academic community. For example, students constituted the biggest users in terms of sessions and pages viewed, and they were more likely to undertake longer online sessions. Undergraduates and postgraduates were the most likely users of library links to access scholarly databases, suggesting an important "hot link" role for libraries. Originality/value - Few studies have focused on the actual (rather than perceived) information-seeking behaviour of students. The study fills that gap.
    Date
    23. 2.2009 17:22:41
  15. Google Scholar : Eine Konkurrenz zu Web of Knowledge and Scopus? (2005) 0.09 
    0.089238286 = product of:
  0.17847657 = sum of:
    0.17847657 = product of:
      0.35695314 = sum of:
        0.35695314 = weight(_text_:scholar in 4381) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.35695314 = score(doc=4381,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.327981 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.5669885 = idf(docFreq=168, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049943898 = queryNorm
            1.0883348 = fieldWeight in 4381, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              6.5669885 = idf(docFreq=168, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4381)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    "Am 18. November 2004 ist die Beta-Version eines neuen Suchdienstes von Google in Betrieb gegangen: Google Scholar (http/scholar.google.com/), das in Zusammenarbeit mit zahlreichen Fachverlagen entstand, soll Studenten und Wissenschaftlern als erste Anlaufstelle bei der Suche nach akademischen Quellen dienen, heißt es bei den Betreibern. Google Scholar erfasst Bücher, wissenschaftliche Abhandlungen, technische Dokumente, Fachzeitschriften und sonstige Literatur, darunter auch Quellen, die via Open Access frei verfügbar sind, zusammen ca. 1,630.000 Dokumente (im Vergleich dazu verzeichnet das Web of Knowledge ca. 18,500.000 und Scopus 26,733,641 Dokumente). Neben Links zu weiterführenden Bibliotheks-Recherchen bieten die Ergebnislisten auch einen Überblick darüber, wie oft das gefundene Dokument in anderen Publikationen zitiert wurde. Die Trefferliste ist nach absteigender Zitierhäufigkeit gereiht; die Treffer werden zusätzlich aufgewertet, wenn sie ihrerseits von vielzitierten Artikeln zitiert werden. Google Scholar kommt vorerst noch ohne Werbung aus, Branchenkenner rechnen aber damit, dass sich die Sparten-Suchmaschine schon bald zu einer profitablen Angelegenheit für die Betreiber entwickeln wird. "Wirtschaftlich zielt der Dienst darauf ab, akademische Inhalte mit Werbung für hochwertige Produkte und Dienstleistungen zu verknüpfen -- und ich glaube das Konzept geht auf", meint John Sack von der Stanford University. Mark Chillingworth meint sogar: "Google Scholar looks like being a bigger headache to AM services like ISI Web of Knowledge and the newly launched Scopus from Elsevier." [!] Die weitere Entwicklung wird zeigen, ob diese Vermutung berechtigt ist. Am 8. Dezember hat die American Chemical Society Klage gegen Google Scholar wegen der Namensähnlichkeit mit dem SciFinder Scholar eingereicht. Google-Sprecher Steve Langdon wollte sich zu dem Sachverhalt nicht im Detail äußern, sagte lediglich, dass sein Unternehmen von der Nutzung des Begriffs Scholar überzeugt ist und die Klage der ACS gegenstandslos ist."
    Object
    Google Scholar
  16. Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.: Google Scholar citations and Google Web/URL citations : a multi-discipline exploratory analysis (2007) 0.09 
    0.089238286 = product of:
  0.17847657 = sum of:
    0.17847657 = product of:
      0.35695314 = sum of:
        0.35695314 = weight(_text_:scholar in 337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.35695314 = score(doc=337,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.327981 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.5669885 = idf(docFreq=168, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049943898 = queryNorm
            1.0883348 = fieldWeight in 337, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              6.5669885 = idf(docFreq=168, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=337)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    We use a new data gathering method, "Web/URL citation," Web/URL and Google Scholar to compare traditional and Web-based citation patterns across multiple disciplines (biology, chemistry, physics, computing, sociology, economics, psychology, and education) based upon a sample of 1,650 articles from 108 open access (OA) journals published in 2001. A Web/URL citation of an online journal article is a Web mention of its title, URL, or both. For each discipline, except psychology, we found significant correlations between Thomson Scientific (formerly Thomson ISI, here: ISI) citations and both Google Scholar and Google Web/URL citations. Google Scholar citations correlated more highly with ISI citations than did Google Web/URL citations, indicating that the Web/URL method measures a broader type of citation phenomenon. Google Scholar citations were more numerous than ISI citations in computer science and the four social science disciplines, suggesting that Google Scholar is more comprehensive for social sciences and perhaps also when conference articles are valued and published online. We also found large disciplinary differences in the percentage overlap between ISI and Google Scholar citation sources. Finally, although we found many significant trends, there were also numerous exceptions, suggesting that replacing traditional citation sources with the Web or Google Scholar for research impact calculations would be problematic.
    Object
    Google Scholar
  17. Mayr, P.; Walter, A.-K.: Abdeckung und Aktualität des Suchdienstes Google Scholar (2006) 0.09 
    0.0874353 = product of:
  0.1748706 = sum of:
    0.1748706 = product of:
      0.3497412 = sum of:
        0.3497412 = weight(_text_:scholar in 5131) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3497412 = score(doc=5131,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.327981 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.5669885 = idf(docFreq=168, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049943898 = queryNorm
            1.0663459 = fieldWeight in 5131, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              6.5669885 = idf(docFreq=168, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5131)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Der Beitrag widmet sich dem neuen Google-Suchdienst Google Scholar. Die Suchmaschine, die ausschließlich wissenschaftliche Dokumente durchsuchen soll, wird mit ihren wichtigsten Funktionen beschrieben und anschließend einem empirischen Test unterzogen. Die durchgeführte Studie basiert auf drei Zeitschriftenlisten: Zeitschriften von Thomson Scientific, Open AccessZeitschriften des Verzeichnisses DOAJ und in der Fachdatenbank SOLIS ausgewertete sozialwissenschaftliche Zeitschriften. Die Abdeckung dieser Zeitschriften durch Google Scholar wurde per Abfrage der Zeitschriftentitel überprüft. Die Studie zeigt Defizite in der Abdeckung und Aktualität des Google Scholarlndex. Weiterhin macht die Studie deutlich, wer die wichtigsten Datenlieferanten für den neuen Suchdienst sind und welche wissenschaftlichen Informationsquellen im Index repräsentiert sind. Die Pluspunkte von Google Scholar liegen in seiner Einfachheit, seiner Suchgeschwindigkeit und letztendlich seiner Kostenfreiheit. Die Recherche in Fachdatenbanken kann Google Scholar trotz sichtbarer Potenziale (z. B. Zitationsanalyse) aber heute aufgrund mangelnder fachlicher Abdeckung und Transparenz nicht ersetzen.
    Object
    Google Scholar
  18. Jascó, P.: Péter's picks and pans : CiteBaseSearch, Institute of Physics Archive, and Google's index to scholarly archive (2004) 0.08 
    0.083289064 = product of:
  0.16657813 = sum of:
    0.16657813 = product of:
      0.33315626 = sum of:
        0.33315626 = weight(_text_:scholar in 2341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.33315626 = score(doc=2341,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.327981 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.5669885 = idf(docFreq=168, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049943898 = queryNorm
            1.0157791 = fieldWeight in 2341, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.5669885 = idf(docFreq=168, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2341)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Object
    Google scholar
  19. York, M.C.: Calling the scholars home : Google Scholar as a tool for rediscovering the academic library (2005) 0.08 
    0.083289064 = product of:
  0.16657813 = sum of:
    0.16657813 = product of:
      0.33315626 = sum of:
        0.33315626 = weight(_text_:scholar in 361) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.33315626 = score(doc=361,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.327981 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.5669885 = idf(docFreq=168, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049943898 = queryNorm
            1.0157791 = fieldWeight in 361, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              6.5669885 = idf(docFreq=168, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=361)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Library guides to Google Scholar reveal the concerns and fears of librarians as they watch their users slip further and further outside of their domain of influence. Comparing these fears against data from recent surveys and studies of students and faculty suggests that a profound change in the role of the library in relation to how users search for and discover information has been underway for some time, and that Google Scholar is only the most recent and visible manifestation of that revolution.
    Object
    Google Scholar
  20. Harzing, A.-W.: Comparing the Google Scholar h-index with the ISI Journal Impact Factor (2008) 0.08 
    0.083289064 = product of:
  0.16657813 = sum of:
    0.16657813 = product of:
      0.33315626 = sum of:
        0.33315626 = weight(_text_:scholar in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.33315626 = score(doc=855,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.327981 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.5669885 = idf(docFreq=168, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049943898 = queryNorm
            1.0157791 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              6.5669885 = idf(docFreq=168, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Publication in academic journals is a key criterion for appointment, tenure and promotion in universities. Many universities weigh publications according to the quality or impact of the journal. Traditionally, journal quality has been assessed through the ISI Journal Impact Factor (JIF). This paper proposes an alternative metric - Hirsch's h-index - and data source - Google Scholar - to assess journal impact. Using a systematic comparison between the Google Scholar h-index and the ISI JIF for a sample of 838 journals in Economics & Business, we argue that the former provides a more accurate and comprehensive measure of journal impact.
    Object
    Google Scholar

Authors

Languages

Types

  • a 1160
  • m 144
  • el 66
  • s 51
  • b 26
  • x 13
  • i 8
  • n 2
  • r 2
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications