Search (3920 results, page 1 of 196)

  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Goodchild, M.F.: ¬The Alexandria Digital Library Project : review, assessment, and prospects (2004) 0.30
    0.30437198 = sum of:
      0.042803407 = product of:
        0.12841022 = sum of:
          0.12841022 = weight(_text_:objects in 1153) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.12841022 = score(doc=1153,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.31238306 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05877307 = queryNorm
              0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 1153, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1153)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.14145125 = weight(_text_:digital in 1153) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.14145125 = score(doc=1153,freq=8.0), product of:
          0.23183343 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05877307 = queryNorm
          0.61014175 = fieldWeight in 1153, product of:
            2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
              8.0 = termFreq=8.0
            3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1153)
      0.062851794 = weight(_text_:library in 1153) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.062851794 = score(doc=1153,freq=8.0), product of:
          0.15453665 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05877307 = queryNorm
          0.40671125 = fieldWeight in 1153, product of:
            2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
              8.0 = termFreq=8.0
            2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1153)
      0.057265528 = product of:
        0.114531055 = sum of:
          0.114531055 = weight(_text_:project in 1153) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.114531055 = score(doc=1153,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.24808002 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05877307 = queryNorm
              0.4616698 = fieldWeight in 1153, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1153)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The Alexandria Digital Library (ADL) was established in the late 1990s as a response to several perceived problems of traditional map libraries, notably access and organization. By 1999 it had evolved into an operational digital library, offering a well-defined set of services to a broad user community, based on an extensive collection of georeferenced information objects. The vision of ADL continues to evolve, as technology makes new services possible, as its users become more sophisticated and demanding, and as the broader field of geographic information science (GIScience) identifies new avenues for research and application.
    Object
    Alexandria Digital Library Project
  2. Altenhöner, R.: Data for the future : the German project "Co-operative development of a long-term digital information archive" (kopal) (2006) 0.26
    0.26422358 = sum of:
      0.030573865 = product of:
        0.091721594 = sum of:
          0.091721594 = weight(_text_:objects in 2590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.091721594 = score(doc=2590,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.31238306 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05877307 = queryNorm
              0.29361898 = fieldWeight in 2590, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2590)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.112962365 = weight(_text_:digital in 2590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.112962365 = score(doc=2590,freq=10.0), product of:
          0.23183343 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05877307 = queryNorm
          0.4872566 = fieldWeight in 2590, product of:
            3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
              10.0 = termFreq=10.0
            3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2590)
      0.03887947 = weight(_text_:library in 2590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03887947 = score(doc=2590,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.15453665 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05877307 = queryNorm
          0.25158736 = fieldWeight in 2590, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2590)
      0.0818079 = product of:
        0.1636158 = sum of:
          0.1636158 = weight(_text_:project in 2590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.1636158 = score(doc=2590,freq=16.0), product of:
              0.24808002 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05877307 = queryNorm
              0.6595283 = fieldWeight in 2590, product of:
                4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                  16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2590)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - One of the unresolved problems of the global information society is ensuring the long-term accessibility of digital documents. The project kopal tackles this problem head-on: in a three-year project kopal's objective is the practical testing and implementation of a cooperatively created and operated long-term archival system for digital resources. Design/methodology/approach - The system will be implemented in accordance with international standards for long-term archiving and metadata within the Open Archival Information System (OAIS) framework. The project partners, Die Deutsche Bibliothek (DDB), Göttingen State and University Library (SUB Göttingen), IBM Deutschland GmbH and the Gesellschaft für wissenschaftliche Datenverarbeitung mbH Göttingen (GWDG), will establish a cooperatively transferable solution for cultural heritage institutions, as well as for business and industry. Findings - Within the project, the project partners DDB and SUB Göttingen are developing software for the input and access of data, which will be released under an open-source license. Research limitations/implications - Long-term preservation methods and strategies will be discussed in general in the paper. Practical implications - The project will present a stable and reusable platform for additional partners and users, especially for cultural heritage organisations. Originality/value - The solution is based on Digital Information and Archiving System (DIAS), jointly devised by IBM and the National Library of The Netherlands in The Hague, and it will be adapted to the needs of the project with several extensions. Establishing a collaborative solution for long-term preservation is a milestone in the development of systems for the long-term availability of digital objects.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 24(2006) no.4, S.574-582
  3. Buzinkay, M.: Neue Entwicklungen im Web : eSnips, meX, Google Book Search und World Digital Library Project (2005) 0.26
    0.25936663 = product of:
      0.34582216 = sum of:
        0.17146482 = weight(_text_:digital in 7601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17146482 = score(doc=7601,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.23183343 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05877307 = queryNorm
            0.7396035 = fieldWeight in 7601, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7601)
        0.07618788 = weight(_text_:library in 7601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07618788 = score(doc=7601,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15453665 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05877307 = queryNorm
            0.4930085 = fieldWeight in 7601, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7601)
        0.09816947 = product of:
          0.19633894 = sum of:
            0.19633894 = weight(_text_:project in 7601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.19633894 = score(doc=7601,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.24808002 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05877307 = queryNorm
                0.79143393 = fieldWeight in 7601, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7601)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Object
    World Digital Library Project
  4. Dobratz, S.; Neuroth, H.: nestor: Network of Expertise in long-term STOrage of digital Resources : a digital preservation initiative for Germany (2004) 0.25
    0.2522414 = sum of:
      0.04853451 = product of:
        0.14560352 = sum of:
          0.14560352 = weight(_text_:objects in 1195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.14560352 = score(doc=1195,freq=14.0), product of:
              0.31238306 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05877307 = queryNorm
              0.4661057 = fieldWeight in 1195, product of:
                3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                  14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1195)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.13555482 = weight(_text_:digital in 1195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.13555482 = score(doc=1195,freq=40.0), product of:
          0.23183343 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05877307 = queryNorm
          0.58470786 = fieldWeight in 1195, product of:
            6.3245554 = tf(freq=40.0), with freq of:
              40.0 = termFreq=40.0
            3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1195)
      0.03809394 = weight(_text_:library in 1195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03809394 = score(doc=1195,freq=16.0), product of:
          0.15453665 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05877307 = queryNorm
          0.24650425 = fieldWeight in 1195, product of:
            4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
              16.0 = termFreq=16.0
            2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1195)
      0.030058142 = product of:
        0.060116284 = sum of:
          0.060116284 = weight(_text_:project in 1195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.060116284 = score(doc=1195,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.24808002 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05877307 = queryNorm
              0.24232619 = fieldWeight in 1195, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1195)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Sponsored by the German Ministry of Education and Research with funding of 800.000 EURO, the German Network of Expertise in long-term storage of digital resources (nestor) began in June 2003 as a cooperative effort of 6 partners representing different players within the field of long-term preservation. The partners include: * The German National Library (Die Deutsche Bibliothek) as the lead institution for the project * The State and University Library of Lower Saxony Göttingen (Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek Göttingen) * The Computer and Media Service and the University Library of Humboldt-University Berlin (Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin) * The Bavarian State Library in Munich (Bayerische Staatsbibliothek) * The Institute for Museum Information in Berlin (Institut für Museumskunde) * General Directorate of the Bavarian State Archives (GDAB) As in other countries, long-term preservation of digital resources has become an important issue in Germany in recent years. Nevertheless, coming to agreement with institutions throughout the country to cooperate on tasks for a long-term preservation effort has taken a great deal of effort. Although there had been considerable attention paid to the preservation of physical media like CD-ROMS, technologies available for the long-term preservation of digital publications like e-books, digital dissertations, websites, etc., are still lacking. Considering the importance of the task within the federal structure of Germany, with the responsibility of each federal state for its science and culture activities, it is obvious that the approach to a successful solution of these issues in Germany must be a cooperative approach. Since 2000, there have been discussions about strategies and techniques for long-term archiving of digital information, particularly within the distributed structure of Germany's library and archival institutions. A key part of all the previous activities was focusing on using existing standards and analyzing the context in which those standards would be applied. One such activity, the Digital Library Forum Planning Project, was done on behalf of the German Ministry of Education and Research in 2002, where the vision of a digital library in 2010 that can meet the changing and increasing needs of users was developed and described in detail, including the infrastructure required and how the digital library would work technically, what it would contain and how it would be organized. The outcome was a strategic plan for certain selected specialist areas, where, amongst other topics, a future call for action for long-term preservation was defined, described and explained against the background of practical experience.
    As follow up, in 2002 the nestor long-term archiving working group provided an initial spark towards planning and organising coordinated activities concerning the long-term preservation and long-term availability of digital documents in Germany. This resulted in a workshop, held 29 - 30 October 2002, where major tasks were discussed. Influenced by the demands and progress of the nestor network, the participants reached agreement to start work on application-oriented projects and to address the following topics: * Overlapping problems o Collection and preservation of digital objects (selection criteria, preservation policy) o Definition of criteria for trusted repositories o Creation of models of cooperation, etc. * Digital objects production process o Analysis of potential conflicts between production and long-term preservation o Documentation of existing document models and recommendations for standards models to be used for long-term preservation o Identification systems for digital objects, etc. * Transfer of digital objects o Object data and metadata o Transfer protocols and interoperability o Handling of different document types, e.g. dynamic publications, etc. * Long-term preservation of digital objects o Design and prototype implementation of depot systems for digital objects (OAIS was chosen to be the best functional model.) o Authenticity o Functional requirements on user interfaces of an depot system o Identification systems for digital objects, etc. At the end of the workshop, participants decided to establish a permanent distributed infrastructure for long-term preservation and long-term accessibility of digital resources in Germany comparable, e.g., to the Digital Preservation Coalition in the UK. The initial phase, nestor, is now being set up by the above-mentioned 3-year funding project.
  5. Proffitt, M.: Pulling it all together : use of METS in RLG cultural materials service (2004) 0.25
    0.25125772 = sum of:
      0.06918076 = product of:
        0.20754227 = sum of:
          0.20754227 = weight(_text_:objects in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.20754227 = score(doc=767,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.31238306 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05877307 = queryNorm
              0.6643839 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.11430988 = weight(_text_:digital in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11430988 = score(doc=767,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.23183343 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05877307 = queryNorm
          0.493069 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
      0.03591531 = weight(_text_:library in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03591531 = score(doc=767,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15453665 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05877307 = queryNorm
          0.23240642 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
      0.031851757 = product of:
        0.063703515 = sum of:
          0.063703515 = weight(_text_:22 in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.063703515 = score(doc=767,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20581327 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05877307 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    RLG has used METS for a particular application, that is as a wrapper for structural metadata. When RLG cultural materials was launched, there was no single way to deal with "complex digital objects". METS provides a standard means of encoding metadata regarding the digital objects represented in RCM, and METS has now been fully integrated into the workflow for this service.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.65-68
  6. Thaller, M.: From the digitized to the digital library (2001) 0.25
    0.24982454 = sum of:
      0.025942784 = product of:
        0.07782835 = sum of:
          0.07782835 = weight(_text_:objects in 1159) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07782835 = score(doc=1159,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.31238306 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05877307 = queryNorm
              0.24914396 = fieldWeight in 1159, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1159)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.12859862 = weight(_text_:digital in 1159) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.12859862 = score(doc=1159,freq=36.0), product of:
          0.23183343 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05877307 = queryNorm
          0.55470264 = fieldWeight in 1159, product of:
            6.0 = tf(freq=36.0), with freq of:
              36.0 = termFreq=36.0
            3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1159)
      0.040404722 = weight(_text_:library in 1159) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.040404722 = score(doc=1159,freq=18.0), product of:
          0.15453665 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05877307 = queryNorm
          0.2614572 = fieldWeight in 1159, product of:
            4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
              18.0 = termFreq=18.0
            2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1159)
      0.05487841 = product of:
        0.10975682 = sum of:
          0.10975682 = weight(_text_:project in 1159) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.10975682 = score(doc=1159,freq=20.0), product of:
              0.24808002 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05877307 = queryNorm
              0.44242507 = fieldWeight in 1159, product of:
                4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                  20.0 = termFreq=20.0
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1159)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The author holds a chair in Humanities Computer Science at the University of Cologne. For a number of years, he has been responsible for digitization projects, either as project director or as the person responsible for the technology being employed on the projects. The "Duderstadt project" (http://www.archive.geschichte.mpg.de/duderstadt/dud-e.htm) is one such project. It is one of the early large-scale manuscript servers, finished at the end of 1998, with approximately 80,000 high resolution documents representing the holdings of a city archive before the year 1600. The digital library of the Max-Planck-Institut für Europäische Rechtsgeschichte in Frankfurt (http://www.mpier.uni-frankfurt.de/dlib) is another project on which the author has worked, with currently approximately 900,000 pages. The author is currently project director of the project "Codices Electronici Ecclesiae Colonensis" (CEEC), which has just started and will ultimately consist of approximately 130,000 very high resolution color pages representing the complete holdings of the manuscript library of a medieval cathedral. It is being designed in close cooperation with the user community of such material. The project site (http://www.ceec.uni-koeln.de), while not yet officially opened, currently holds about 5,000 pages and is growing by 100 - 150 pages per day. Parallel to the CEEC model project, a conceptual project, the "Codex Electronicus Colonensis" (CEC), is at work on the definition of an abstract model for the representation of medieval codices in digital form. The following paper has grown out of the design considerations for the mentioned CEC project. The paper reflects a growing concern of the author's that some of the recent advances in digital (research) libraries are being diluted because it is not clear whether the advances really reach the audience for whom the projects would be most useful. Many, if not most, digitization projects have aimed at existing collections as individual servers. A digital library, however, should be more than a digitized one. It should be built according to principles that are not necessarily the same as those employed for paper collections, and it should be evaluated according to different measures which are not yet totally clear. The paper takes the form of six theses on various aspects of the ongoing transition to digital libraries. These theses have been presented at a forum on the German "retrodigitization" program. The program aims at the systematic conversion of library resources into digital form, concentrates for a number of reasons on material primarily of interest to the Humanities, and is funded by the German research council. As such this program is directly aimed at improving the overall infrastructure of academic research; other users of libraries are of interest, but are not central to the program.
    Content
    Theses: 1. Who should be addressed by digital libraries? How shall we measure whether we have reached the desired audience? Thesis: The primary audience for a digital library is neither the leading specialist in the respective field, nor the freshman, but the advanced student or young researcher and the "almost specialist". The primary topic of digitization projects should not be the absolute top range of the "treasures" of a collection, but those materials that we always have wanted to promote if they were just marginally more important. Whether we effectively serve them to the appropriate community of serious users can only be measured according to criteria that have yet to be developed. 2. The appropriate size of digital libraries and their access tools Thesis: Digital collections need a critical, minimal size to make their access worthwhile. In the end, users want to access information, not metadata or gimmicks. 3. The quality of digital objects Thesis: If digital library resources are to be integrated into the daily work of the research community, they must appear on the screen of the researcher in a quality that is useful in actual work. 4. The granularity / modularity of digital repositories Thesis: While digital libraries are self-contained bodies of information, they are not the basic unit that most users want to access. Users are, as a rule, more interested in the individual objects in the library and need a straightforward way to access them. 5. Digital collections as integrated reference systems Thesis: Traditional libraries support their collections with reference material. Digital collections need to find appropriate models to replicate this functionality. 6. Library and teaching Thesis: The use of multimedia in teaching is as much of a current buzzword as the creation of digital collections. It is obvious that they should be connected. A clear-cut separation of the two approaches is nevertheless necessary.
  7. Buchel, O.; Coleman, A.: How can classificatory structures be used to improve science education? (2003) 0.25
    0.24913076 = product of:
      0.33217433 = sum of:
        0.14000043 = weight(_text_:digital in 155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14000043 = score(doc=155,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.23183343 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05877307 = queryNorm
            0.60388374 = fieldWeight in 155, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=155)
        0.03591531 = weight(_text_:library in 155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03591531 = score(doc=155,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15453665 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05877307 = queryNorm
            0.23240642 = fieldWeight in 155, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=155)
        0.15625858 = sum of:
          0.09255506 = weight(_text_:project in 155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09255506 = score(doc=155,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24808002 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05877307 = queryNorm
              0.37308553 = fieldWeight in 155, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=155)
          0.063703515 = weight(_text_:22 in 155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.063703515 = score(doc=155,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20581327 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05877307 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 155, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=155)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    There is increasing evidence that libraries, traditional and digital, must support learning, especially the acquisition and enhancement of scientific reasoning skills. This paper discusses how classificatory structures, such as a faceted thesaurus, can be enhanced for novice science learning. Physical geography is used as the domain discipline, and the Alexandria Digital Earth Prototype project provides the test bed for instructional materials and user analyses. The use of concept maps and topic maps for developing digital learning spaces is briefly discussed.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 47(2003) no.1, S.4-15
  8. Kruk, S.R.; Kruk, E.; Stankiewicz, K.: Evaluation of semantic and social technologies for digital libraries (2009) 0.25
    0.24790458 = sum of:
      0.036688637 = product of:
        0.11006591 = sum of:
          0.11006591 = weight(_text_:objects in 3387) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11006591 = score(doc=3387,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.31238306 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05877307 = queryNorm
              0.35234275 = fieldWeight in 3387, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3387)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16039065 = weight(_text_:digital in 3387) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.16039065 = score(doc=3387,freq=14.0), product of:
          0.23183343 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05877307 = queryNorm
          0.6918357 = fieldWeight in 3387, product of:
            3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
              14.0 = termFreq=14.0
            3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3387)
      0.026936483 = weight(_text_:library in 3387) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.026936483 = score(doc=3387,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15453665 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05877307 = queryNorm
          0.17430481 = fieldWeight in 3387, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3387)
      0.023888817 = product of:
        0.047777634 = sum of:
          0.047777634 = weight(_text_:22 in 3387) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.047777634 = score(doc=3387,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20581327 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05877307 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3387, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3387)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Libraries are the tools we use to learn and to answer our questions. The quality of our work depends, among others, on the quality of the tools we use. Recent research in digital libraries is focused, on one hand on improving the infrastructure of the digital library management systems (DLMS), and on the other on improving the metadata models used to annotate collections of objects maintained by DLMS. The latter includes, among others, the semantic web and social networking technologies. Recently, the semantic web and social networking technologies are being introduced to the digital libraries domain. The expected outcome is that the overall quality of information discovery in digital libraries can be improved by employing social and semantic technologies. In this chapter we present the results of an evaluation of social and semantic end-user information discovery services for the digital libraries.
    Date
    1. 8.2010 12:35:22
    Source
    Semantic digital libraries. Eds.: S.R. Kruk, B. McDaniel
  9. Pattuelli, M.C.: Teachers' perspectives and contextual dimensions to guide the design of N.C. history learning objects and ontology (2008) 0.23
    0.23247305 = sum of:
      0.060533162 = product of:
        0.18159948 = sum of:
          0.18159948 = weight(_text_:objects in 2041) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.18159948 = score(doc=2041,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.31238306 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05877307 = queryNorm
              0.5813359 = fieldWeight in 2041, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2041)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.10002114 = weight(_text_:digital in 2041) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.10002114 = score(doc=2041,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.23183343 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05877307 = queryNorm
          0.43143538 = fieldWeight in 2041, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2041)
      0.031425897 = weight(_text_:library in 2041) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.031425897 = score(doc=2041,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15453665 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05877307 = queryNorm
          0.20335563 = fieldWeight in 2041, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2041)
      0.04049284 = product of:
        0.08098568 = sum of:
          0.08098568 = weight(_text_:project in 2041) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08098568 = score(doc=2041,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24808002 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05877307 = queryNorm
              0.32644984 = fieldWeight in 2041, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2041)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper describes an ongoing research project that involves the study of teachers' information seeking behaviors, needs and practices in relation to a collection of primary source materials available through the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC) Library's digital library Documenting the American South (DocSouth). By gaining an in-depth understanding of the needs and wants of teachers in the context of their work, we hope to build a collection of learning objects and a domain ontology applied to the collection to improve teachers' access to the cultural heritage materials and to facilitate their actual use in the classroom.
    Footnote
    Beitrag eines Themenschwerpunktes "Digital libraries in the context of users' broader activities"
  10. Klas, C.-P.; Fuhr, N.; Schaefer, A.: Evaluating strategic support for information access in the DAFFODIL system (2004) 0.22
    0.21991533 = sum of:
      0.036688637 = product of:
        0.11006591 = sum of:
          0.11006591 = weight(_text_:objects in 2419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11006591 = score(doc=2419,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.31238306 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05877307 = queryNorm
              0.35234275 = fieldWeight in 2419, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2419)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.12124394 = weight(_text_:digital in 2419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.12124394 = score(doc=2419,freq=8.0), product of:
          0.23183343 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05877307 = queryNorm
          0.52297866 = fieldWeight in 2419, product of:
            2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
              8.0 = termFreq=8.0
            3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2419)
      0.03809394 = weight(_text_:library in 2419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03809394 = score(doc=2419,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.15453665 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05877307 = queryNorm
          0.24650425 = fieldWeight in 2419, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2419)
      0.023888817 = product of:
        0.047777634 = sum of:
          0.047777634 = weight(_text_:22 in 2419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.047777634 = score(doc=2419,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20581327 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05877307 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2419, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2419)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The digital library system Daffodil is targeted at strategic support of users during the information search process. For searching, exploring and managing digital library objects it provides user-customisable information seeking patterns over a federation of heterogeneous digital libraries. In this paper evaluation results with respect to retrieval effectiveness, efficiency and user satisfaction are presented. The analysis focuses on strategic support for the scientific work-flow. Daffodil supports the whole work-flow, from data source selection over information seeking to the representation, organisation and reuse of information. By embedding high level search functionality into the scientific work-flow, the user experiences better strategic system support due to a more systematic work process. These ideas have been implemented in Daffodil followed by a qualitative evaluation. The evaluation has been conducted with 28 participants, ranging from information seeking novices to experts. The results are promising, as they support the chosen model.
    Date
    16.11.2008 16:22:48
    Source
    Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 8th European conference, ECDL 2004, Bath, UK, September 12-17, 2004 : proceedings. Eds.: Heery, R. u. E. Lyon
  11. Broughton, V.: Faceted classification as a basis for knowledge organization in a digital environment : the Bliss Bibliographic Classification as a model for vocabulary management and the creation of multidimensional knowledge structures (2003) 0.22
    0.21957722 = sum of:
      0.036688637 = product of:
        0.11006591 = sum of:
          0.11006591 = weight(_text_:objects in 2631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11006591 = score(doc=2631,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.31238306 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05877307 = queryNorm
              0.35234275 = fieldWeight in 2631, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2631)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.12124394 = weight(_text_:digital in 2631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.12124394 = score(doc=2631,freq=8.0), product of:
          0.23183343 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05877307 = queryNorm
          0.52297866 = fieldWeight in 2631, product of:
            2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
              8.0 = termFreq=8.0
            3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2631)
      0.026936483 = weight(_text_:library in 2631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.026936483 = score(doc=2631,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15453665 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05877307 = queryNorm
          0.17430481 = fieldWeight in 2631, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2631)
      0.03470815 = product of:
        0.0694163 = sum of:
          0.0694163 = weight(_text_:project in 2631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0694163 = score(doc=2631,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24808002 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05877307 = queryNorm
              0.27981415 = fieldWeight in 2631, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2631)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The paper examines the way in which classification schemes can be applied to the organization of digital resources. The case is argued for the particular suitability of schemes based an faceted principles for the organization of complex digital objects. Details are given of a co-operative project between the School of Library Archive & Information Studies, University College London, and the United Kingdom Higher Education gateways Arts and Humanities Data Service and Humbul, in which a faceted knowledge structure is being developed for the indexing and display of digital materials within a new combined humanities portal.
  12. Kurth, M.; Ruddy, D.; Rupp, N.: Repurposing MARC metadata : using digital project experience to develop a metadata management design (2004) 0.22
    0.21923313 = product of:
      0.29231083 = sum of:
        0.12124394 = weight(_text_:digital in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12124394 = score(doc=4748,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.23183343 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05877307 = queryNorm
            0.52297866 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
        0.053872965 = weight(_text_:library in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053872965 = score(doc=4748,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.15453665 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05877307 = queryNorm
            0.34860963 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
        0.11719394 = sum of:
          0.0694163 = weight(_text_:project in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0694163 = score(doc=4748,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24808002 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05877307 = queryNorm
              0.27981415 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
          0.047777634 = weight(_text_:22 in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.047777634 = score(doc=4748,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20581327 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05877307 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    Metadata and information technology staff in libraries that are building digital collections typically extract and manipulate MARC metadata sets to provide access to digital content via non-MARC schemes. Metadata processing in these libraries involves defining the relationships between metadata schemes, moving metadata between schemes, and coordinating the intellectual activity and physical resources required to create and manipulate metadata. Actively managing the non-MARC metadata resources used to build digital collections is something most of these libraries have only begun to do. This article proposes strategies for managing MARC metadata repurposing efforts as the first step in a coordinated approach to library metadata management. Guided by lessons learned from Cornell University library mapping and transformation activities, the authors apply the literature of data resource management to library metadata management and propose a model for managing MARC metadata repurposing processes through the implementation of a metadata management design.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.144-152
  13. Ma, Y.-L.; Liu, W.: Digital resources and metadata application in Shanghai Library (2003) 0.22
    0.21835108 = product of:
      0.29113477 = sum of:
        0.1581473 = weight(_text_:digital in 5506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1581473 = score(doc=5506,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.23183343 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05877307 = queryNorm
            0.6821592 = fieldWeight in 5506, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5506)
        0.062851794 = weight(_text_:library in 5506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.062851794 = score(doc=5506,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.15453665 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05877307 = queryNorm
            0.40671125 = fieldWeight in 5506, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5506)
        0.07013567 = product of:
          0.14027134 = sum of:
            0.14027134 = weight(_text_:project in 5506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14027134 = score(doc=5506,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.24808002 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05877307 = queryNorm
                0.5654278 = fieldWeight in 5506, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5506)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    The Shanghai Digital Library (SDL) is a component of the China Digital Library Project. This paper introduces the framework, goals, and contents of the China Digital Library Project. The vision, mission, system architecture, digital resources, and related major technology of the SDL project are discussed. Also, the background of the Chinese metadata application and the metadata scheme of the SDL are described, and the features of metadata application in practical cases are analyzed. Finally, current issues of metadata application and their solutions are suggested.
  14. Cantara, L.: METS: the metadata encoding and transmission standard (2005) 0.22
    0.2168132 = product of:
      0.2890843 = sum of:
        0.08203829 = product of:
          0.24611486 = sum of:
            0.24611486 = weight(_text_:objects in 5727) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.24611486 = score(doc=5727,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.31238306 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05877307 = queryNorm
                0.7878624 = fieldWeight in 5727, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5727)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.16039065 = weight(_text_:digital in 5727) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16039065 = score(doc=5727,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.23183343 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05877307 = queryNorm
            0.6918357 = fieldWeight in 5727, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5727)
        0.04665536 = weight(_text_:library in 5727) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04665536 = score(doc=5727,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.15453665 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05877307 = queryNorm
            0.30190483 = fieldWeight in 5727, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5727)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    The Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard (METS) is a data communication standard for encoding descriptive, administrative, and structural metadata regarding objects within a digital library, expressed using the XML Schema Language of the World Wide Web Consortium. An initiative of the Digital Library Federation, METS is under development by an international editorial board and is maintained in the Network Development and MARC Standards Office of the Library of Congress. Designed in conformance with the Open Archival Information System (OAIS) Reference Model, a METS document encapsulates digital objects and metadata as Information Packages for transmitting and/or exchanging digital objects to and from digital repositories, disseminating digital objects via the Web, and archiving digital objects for long-term preservation and access. This paper presents an introduction to the METS standard and through illustrated examples, demonstrates how to build a METS document.
  15. Yee, R.; Beaubien, R.: ¬A preliminary crosswalk from METS to IMS content packaging (2004) 0.21
    0.20816214 = sum of:
      0.051885568 = product of:
        0.1556567 = sum of:
          0.1556567 = weight(_text_:objects in 4752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.1556567 = score(doc=4752,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.31238306 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05877307 = queryNorm
              0.49828792 = fieldWeight in 4752, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4752)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.08573241 = weight(_text_:digital in 4752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08573241 = score(doc=4752,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.23183343 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05877307 = queryNorm
          0.36980176 = fieldWeight in 4752, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4752)
      0.04665536 = weight(_text_:library in 4752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04665536 = score(doc=4752,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.15453665 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05877307 = queryNorm
          0.30190483 = fieldWeight in 4752, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4752)
      0.023888817 = product of:
        0.047777634 = sum of:
          0.047777634 = weight(_text_:22 in 4752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.047777634 = score(doc=4752,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20581327 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05877307 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4752, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4752)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    As educational technology becomes pervasive, demand will grow for library content to be incorporated into courseware. Among the barriers impeding interoperability between libraries and educational tools is the difference in specifications commonly used for the exchange of digital objects and metadata. Among libraries, Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard (METS) is a new but increasingly popular standard; the IMS content-package (IMS-CP) plays a parallel role in educational technology. This article describes how METS-encoded library content can be converted into digital objects for IMS-compliant systems through an XSLT-based crosswalk. The conceptual models behind METS and IMS-CP are compared, the design and limitations of an XSLT-based translation are described, and the crosswalks are related to other techniques to enhance interoperability.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.69-81
  16. Mayr, P.; Petras, V.: Building a Terminology Network for Search : the KoMoHe project (2008) 0.20
    0.20431736 = product of:
      0.27242315 = sum of:
        0.07072563 = weight(_text_:digital in 2618) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07072563 = score(doc=2618,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23183343 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05877307 = queryNorm
            0.30507088 = fieldWeight in 2618, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2618)
        0.031425897 = weight(_text_:library in 2618) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031425897 = score(doc=2618,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15453665 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05877307 = queryNorm
            0.20335563 = fieldWeight in 2618, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2618)
        0.17027164 = sum of:
          0.114531055 = weight(_text_:project in 2618) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.114531055 = score(doc=2618,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.24808002 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05877307 = queryNorm
              0.4616698 = fieldWeight in 2618, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2618)
          0.055740576 = weight(_text_:22 in 2618) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.055740576 = score(doc=2618,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20581327 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05877307 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2618, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2618)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    The paper reports about results on the GESIS-IZ project "Competence Center Modeling and Treatment of Semantic Heterogeneity" (KoMoHe). KoMoHe supervised a terminology mapping effort, in which 'cross-concordances' between major controlled vocabularies were organized, created and managed. In this paper we describe the establishment and implementation of crossconcordances for search in a digital library (DL).
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  17. Goldberga, A.: Synergy towards shared standards for ALM : Latvian scenario (2008) 0.20
    0.20163721 = product of:
      0.2688496 = sum of:
        0.10500033 = weight(_text_:digital in 2322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10500033 = score(doc=2322,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.23183343 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05877307 = queryNorm
            0.4529128 = fieldWeight in 2322, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2322)
        0.04665536 = weight(_text_:library in 2322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04665536 = score(doc=2322,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.15453665 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05877307 = queryNorm
            0.30190483 = fieldWeight in 2322, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2322)
        0.11719394 = sum of:
          0.0694163 = weight(_text_:project in 2322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0694163 = score(doc=2322,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24808002 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05877307 = queryNorm
              0.27981415 = fieldWeight in 2322, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2322)
          0.047777634 = weight(_text_:22 in 2322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.047777634 = score(doc=2322,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20581327 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05877307 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2322, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2322)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    The report reflects the Latvian scenario in co-operation for standardization of memory institutions. Differences and problems as well as benefits and possible solutions, tasks and activities of Standardization Technical Committee for Archives, Libraries and Museums Work (MABSTK) are analysed. Map of standards as a vision for ALM collaboration in standardization and "Digitizer's Handbook" (translated in English) prepared by the Competence Centre for Digitization of the National Library of Latvia (NLL) are presented. Shortcut to building the National Digital Library Letonica and its digital architecture (with pilot project about the Latvian composer Jazeps Vitols and the digital collection of expresident of Latvia Vaira Vike-Freiberga) reflects the practical co-operation between different players.
    Content
    Beitrag während: World library and information congress: 74th IFLA general conference and council, 10-14 August 2008, Québec, Canada.
    Date
    26.12.2011 13:33:22
  18. Bainbridge, D.: Music information retrieval research and its context at the University of Waikato (2004) 0.20
    0.19617644 = product of:
      0.26156858 = sum of:
        0.14145125 = weight(_text_:digital in 3057) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14145125 = score(doc=3057,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.23183343 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05877307 = queryNorm
            0.61014175 = fieldWeight in 3057, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3057)
        0.062851794 = weight(_text_:library in 3057) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.062851794 = score(doc=3057,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.15453665 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05877307 = queryNorm
            0.40671125 = fieldWeight in 3057, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3057)
        0.057265528 = product of:
          0.114531055 = sum of:
            0.114531055 = weight(_text_:project in 3057) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.114531055 = score(doc=3057,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.24808002 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05877307 = queryNorm
                0.4616698 = fieldWeight in 3057, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3057)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    This article describes the digital music library work at the University of Waikato, New Zealand. At the heart of the project is a music information retrieval workbench for evaluating algorithms and performing experiments used in conjunction with four datasets of symbolic notation ranging from contemporary to classical pieces. The outcome of this experimentation is woven together with strands from our larger digital library project to form the Web-based music digital library MELDEX (short for melody index). An overview of the workbench software architecture is given along with a description of how this fits the larger digital library design, followed by several examples of MELDEX in use.
  19. Han, Y.: ¬A RDF-based digital library system (2006) 0.20
    0.19580957 = product of:
      0.26107943 = sum of:
        0.16039065 = weight(_text_:digital in 2524) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16039065 = score(doc=2524,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.23183343 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05877307 = queryNorm
            0.6918357 = fieldWeight in 2524, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2524)
        0.06598064 = weight(_text_:library in 2524) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06598064 = score(doc=2524,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.15453665 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05877307 = queryNorm
            0.42695788 = fieldWeight in 2524, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2524)
        0.03470815 = product of:
          0.0694163 = sum of:
            0.0694163 = weight(_text_:project in 2524) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0694163 = score(doc=2524,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24808002 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05877307 = queryNorm
                0.27981415 = fieldWeight in 2524, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2524)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - To research a resource description framework (RDF) based digital library system that facilitates digital resource management and supports knowledge management for an interoperable information environment. Design/methodology/approach - The paper first introduces some of issues with metadata management and knowledge management and describes the needs for a true interoperable environment for information transferring across domains. A journal delivery application has been implemented as a concept-proof project to demonstrate the usefulness of RDF in digital library systems. Findings - The RDF-based digital library system at the University of Arizona Libraries provides an easy way for digital resource management by integrating other applications regardless of metadata formats and web presence. Practical implications - A journal delivery application has been running in the RDF-based digital library system since April 2005. An electronic theses and dissertation application will be handled by the same system. Originality/value - The paper suggests to use RDF, the semantic web technology, as a new approach to facilitate knowledge management and metadata management. Using RDF technology brings new ways to manage and discover information for libraries.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 24(2006) no.2, S.234-240
  20. Lavoie, B.F.; Connaway, L.S.; O'Neill, E.T.: Mapping WorldCat's digital landscape (2007) 0.19
    0.19472075 = product of:
      0.25962767 = sum of:
        0.18186589 = weight(_text_:digital in 2292) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18186589 = score(doc=2292,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.23183343 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05877307 = queryNorm
            0.78446794 = fieldWeight in 2292, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2292)
        0.053872965 = weight(_text_:library in 2292) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053872965 = score(doc=2292,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.15453665 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05877307 = queryNorm
            0.34860963 = fieldWeight in 2292, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2292)
        0.023888817 = product of:
          0.047777634 = sum of:
            0.047777634 = weight(_text_:22 in 2292) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047777634 = score(doc=2292,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20581327 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05877307 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2292, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2292)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    Digital materials are reshaping library collections and, by extension, traditional library practice for collecting, organizing, and preserving information. This paper uses OCLC's WorldCat bibliographic database as a data source for examining questions relating to digital materials in library collections, including criteria for identifying digital materials algorithmically in MARC21 records; the quantity, types, characteristics, and holdings patterns of digital materials cataloged in WorldCat; and trends in WorldCat cataloging activity for digital materials over time. Issues pertaining to cataloging practice for digital materials and perspectives on digital holdings at the work level also are discussed. Analysis of the aggregate collection represented by the combined digital holdings in WorldCat affords a high-level perspective on historical patterns, suggests future trends, and supplies useful intelligence with which to inform decision making in a variety of areas.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 51(2007) no.2, S.106-115

Languages

Types

  • a 3261
  • m 424
  • el 303
  • s 151
  • b 36
  • x 28
  • i 19
  • r 15
  • n 3
  • p 3
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications