Search (3852 results, page 1 of 193)

  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Decimal Classification Editorial Policy Committee (2002) 0.14 
    0.14195535 = product of:
  0.2839107 = sum of:
    0.2839107 = product of:
      0.42586604 = sum of:
        0.3714005 = weight(_text_:abridged in 236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3714005 = score(doc=236,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.4697581 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.2629 = idf(docFreq=30, maxDocs=44218)
              0.056851476 = queryNorm
            0.79062074 = fieldWeight in 236, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              8.2629 = idf(docFreq=30, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=236)
        0.054465536 = weight(_text_:22 in 236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054465536 = score(doc=236,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19908418 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.056851476 = queryNorm
            0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 236, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=236)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The Decimal Classification Editorial Policy Committee (EPC) held its Meeting 117 at the Library Dec. 3-5, 2001, with chair Andrea Stamm (Northwestern University) presiding. Through its actions at this meeting, significant progress was made toward publication of DDC unabridged Edition 22 in mid-2003 and Abridged Edition 14 in early 2004. For Edition 22, the committee approved the revisions to two major segments of the classification: Table 2 through 55 Iran (the first half of the geographic area table) and 900 History and geography. EPC approved updates to several parts of the classification it had already considered: 004-006 Data processing, Computer science; 340 Law; 370 Education; 510 Mathematics; 610 Medicine; Table 3 issues concerning treatment of scientific and technical themes, with folklore, arts, and printing ramifications at 398.2 - 398.3, 704.94, and 758; Table 5 and Table 6 Ethnic Groups and Languages (portions concerning American native peoples and languages); and tourism issues at 647.9 and 790. Reports on the results of testing the approved 200 Religion and 305-306 Social groups schedules were received, as was a progress report on revision work for the manual being done by Ross Trotter (British Library, retired). Revisions for Abridged Edition 14 that received committee approval included 010 Bibliography; 070 Journalism; 150 Psychology; 370 Education; 380 Commerce, communications, and transportation; 621 Applied physics; 624 Civil engineering; and 629.8 Automatic control engineering. At the meeting the committee received print versions of _DC&_ numbers 4 and 5. Primarily for the use of Dewey translators, these cumulations list changes, substantive and cosmetic, to DDC Edition 21 and Abridged Edition 13 for the period October 1999 - December 2001. EPC will hold its Meeting 118 at the Library May 15-17, 2002.
  2. Proffitt, M.: Pulling it all together : use of METS in RLG cultural materials service (2004) 0.13 
    0.13362691 = sum of:
  0.06691889 = product of:
    0.20075665 = sum of:
      0.20075665 = weight(_text_:objects in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.20075665 = score(doc=767,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.30216965 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056851476 = queryNorm
          0.6643839 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.06670803 = product of:
    0.10006204 = sum of:
      0.038441326 = weight(_text_:12 in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.038441326 = score(doc=767,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15724345 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056851476 = queryNorm
          0.24447013 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
      0.06162072 = weight(_text_:22 in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06162072 = score(doc=767,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19908418 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056851476 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
    0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    RLG has used METS for a particular application, that is as a wrapper for structural metadata. When RLG cultural materials was launched, there was no single way to deal with "complex digital objects". METS provides a standard means of encoding metadata regarding the digital objects represented in RCM, and METS has now been fully integrated into the workflow for this service.
    Date
    8.10.2004 12:19:07
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.65-68
  3. Vizine-Goetz, D.; Beall, J.: Using literary warrant to define a version of the DDC for automated classification services (2004) 0.12 
    0.11803918 = product of:
  0.23607837 = sum of:
    0.23607837 = product of:
      0.35411754 = sum of:
        0.30019942 = weight(_text_:abridged in 2645) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.30019942 = score(doc=2645,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4697581 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.2629 = idf(docFreq=30, maxDocs=44218)
              0.056851476 = queryNorm
            0.6390511 = fieldWeight in 2645, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.2629 = idf(docFreq=30, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2645)
        0.05391813 = weight(_text_:22 in 2645) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05391813 = score(doc=2645,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19908418 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.056851476 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2645, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2645)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This paper presents the results of an exploratory study to determine literary warrant for topics in electronic resources. The classification numbers in Abridged Edition 14 were used as a starting point. Using the principles of abridgment and expansion in Dewey, a version of the DDC is defined that accommodates the topics found an three diverse Web sites that use Dewey: BUBL, Canadian Information By Subject, and KidsClick! The resulting classes are used to create a database for automated classification of Web resources.
    Object
    DDC-22
  4. Vizine-Goetz, D.: DeweyBrowser (2006) 0.11 
    0.11127853 = product of:
  0.22255705 = sum of:
    0.22255705 = product of:
      0.33383557 = sum of:
        0.30019942 = weight(_text_:abridged in 5774) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.30019942 = score(doc=5774,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4697581 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.2629 = idf(docFreq=30, maxDocs=44218)
              0.056851476 = queryNorm
            0.6390511 = fieldWeight in 5774, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.2629 = idf(docFreq=30, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5774)
        0.03363616 = weight(_text_:12 in 5774) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03363616 = score(doc=5774,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15724345 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
              0.056851476 = queryNorm
            0.21391137 = fieldWeight in 5774, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5774)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The DeweyBrowser allows users to search and browse collections of library resources organized by the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) system. The visual interface provides access to several million records from the OCLC WorldCat database and to a collection of records derived from the abridged edition of DDC. The prototype was developed out of a desire to make the most of Dewey numbers assigned to library materials and to explore new ways of providing access to the DDC.
    Date
    5. 6.2001 12:25:05
  5. Sandner, M.; Jahns, Y.: Kurzbericht zum DDC-Übersetzer- und Anwendertreffen bei der IFLA-Konferenz 2005 in Oslo, Norwegen (2005) 0.11 
    0.10680613 = product of:
  0.21361226 = sum of:
    0.21361226 = sum of:
      0.15009971 = weight(_text_:abridged in 4406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.15009971 = score(doc=4406,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.4697581 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.2629 = idf(docFreq=30, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056851476 = queryNorm
          0.31952554 = fieldWeight in 4406, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.2629 = idf(docFreq=30, maxDocs=44218)
            0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4406)
      0.01681808 = weight(_text_:12 in 4406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.01681808 = score(doc=4406,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15724345 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056851476 = queryNorm
          0.106955685 = fieldWeight in 4406, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
            0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4406)
      0.04669447 = weight(_text_:22 in 4406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04669447 = score(doc=4406,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.19908418 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056851476 = queryNorm
          0.23454636 = fieldWeight in 4406, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4406)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    "Am 16. August 2005 fand in Oslo im Rahmen der heurigen IFLA-Konferenz das alljährliche Treffen der DDC-Übersetzer und der weltweiten DeweyAnwender-Institutionen (Nationalbibliotheken, Ersteller von Nationalbibliografien) statt. Die im Sommer 2005 bereits abgeschlossene deutsche Übersetzung wird in der Druckfassung Ende des Jahres in 4 Bänden vorliegen, beim K. G. Saur Verlag in München erscheinen (ISBN 3-598-11651-9) und 2006 vom ebenfalls erstmals ins Deutsche übersetzten DDC-Lehrbuch (ISBN 3-598-11748-5) begleitet. Pläne für neu startende Übersetzungen der DDC 22 gibt es für folgende Sprachen: Arabisch (mit der wachsenden Notwendigkeit, Klasse 200 Religion zu revidieren), Französisch (es erschien zuletzt eine neue Kurzausgabe 14, nun werden eine vierbändige Druckausgabe und eine frz. Webversion anvisiert), Schwedisch, Vietnamesisch (hierfür wird eine an die Sprache und Schrift angepasste Version des deutschen Übersetzungstools zum Einsatz kommen).
    Allgemein DDC 22 ist im Gegensatz zu den früheren Neuauflagen der Standard Edition eine Ausgabe ohne generelle Überarbeitung einer gesamten Klasse. Sie enthält jedoch zahlreiche Änderungen und Expansionen in fast allen Disziplinen und in vielen Hilfstafeln. Es erschien auch eine Sonderausgabe der Klasse 200, Religion. In der aktuellen Kurzausgabe der DDC 22 (14, aus 2004) sind all diese Neuerungen berücksichtigt. Auch die elektronische Version exisitiert in einer vollständigen (WebDewey) und in einer KurzVariante (Abridged WebDewey) und ist immer auf dem jüngsten Stand der Klassifikation. Ein Tutorial für die Nutzung von WebDewey steht unter www.oclc.org /dewey/ resourcesitutorial zur Verfügung. Der Index enthält in dieser elektronischen Fassung weit mehr zusammengesetzte Notationen und verbale Sucheinstiege (resultierend aus den Titeldaten des "WorldCat") als die Druckausgabe, sowie Mappings zu den aktuellsten Normdatensätzen aus LCSH und McSH. Aktuell Die personelle Zusammensetzung des EPC (Editorial Policy Committee) hat sich im letzten Jahr verändert. Dieses oberste Gremium der DDC hat Prioritäten für den aktuellen Arbeitsplan festgelegt. Es wurde vereinbart, größere Änderungsvorhaben via Dewey-Website künftig wie in einem Stellungnahmeverfahren zur fachlichen Diskussion zu stellen. www.oclc.org/dewey/discussion/."
    Date
    6.11.2005 12:27:29
  6. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.11 
    0.105700396 = sum of:
  0.09029522 = product of:
    0.27088565 = sum of:
      0.27088565 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.27088565 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.48198745 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056851476 = queryNorm
          0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.01540518 = product of:
    0.046215538 = sum of:
      0.046215538 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.046215538 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19908418 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056851476 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  7. Yee, R.; Beaubien, R.: ¬A preliminary crosswalk from METS to IMS content packaging (2004) 0.10 
    0.10022019 = sum of:
  0.050189164 = product of:
    0.15056749 = sum of:
      0.15056749 = weight(_text_:objects in 4752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.15056749 = score(doc=4752,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.30216965 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056851476 = queryNorm
          0.49828792 = fieldWeight in 4752, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4752)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.05003102 = product of:
    0.07504653 = sum of:
      0.028830996 = weight(_text_:12 in 4752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.028830996 = score(doc=4752,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15724345 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056851476 = queryNorm
          0.1833526 = fieldWeight in 4752, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4752)
      0.046215538 = weight(_text_:22 in 4752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.046215538 = score(doc=4752,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19908418 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056851476 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4752, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4752)
    0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    As educational technology becomes pervasive, demand will grow for library content to be incorporated into courseware. Among the barriers impeding interoperability between libraries and educational tools is the difference in specifications commonly used for the exchange of digital objects and metadata. Among libraries, Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard (METS) is a new but increasingly popular standard; the IMS content-package (IMS-CP) plays a parallel role in educational technology. This article describes how METS-encoded library content can be converted into digital objects for IMS-compliant systems through an XSLT-based crosswalk. The conceptual models behind METS and IMS-CP are compared, the design and limitations of an XSLT-based translation are described, and the crosswalks are related to other techniques to enhance interoperability.
    Date
    8.10.2004 12:19:07
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.69-81
  8. Lubas, R.L.; Wolfe, R.H.W.; Fleischman, M.: Creating metadata practices for MIT's OpenCourseWare Project (2004) 0.10 
    0.099773474 = sum of:
  0.041403946 = product of:
    0.12421183 = sum of:
      0.12421183 = weight(_text_:objects in 2843) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.12421183 = score(doc=2843,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.30216965 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056851476 = queryNorm
          0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 2843, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2843)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.05836953 = product of:
    0.08755429 = sum of:
      0.03363616 = weight(_text_:12 in 2843) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03363616 = score(doc=2843,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15724345 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056851476 = queryNorm
          0.21391137 = fieldWeight in 2843, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2843)
      0.05391813 = weight(_text_:22 in 2843) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05391813 = score(doc=2843,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19908418 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056851476 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2843, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2843)
    0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    The MIT libraries were called upon to recommend a metadata scheme for the resources contained in MIT's OpenCourseWare (OCW) project. The resources in OCW needed descriptive, structural, and technical metadata. The SCORM standard, which uses IEEE Learning Object Metadata for its descriptive standard, was selected for its focus on educational objects. However, it was clear that the Libraries would need to recommend how the standard would be applied and adapted to accommodate needs that were not addressed in the standard's specifications. The newly formed MIT Libraries Metadata Unit adapted established practices from AACR2 and MARC traditions when facing situations in which there were no precedents to follow.
    Date
    8.10.2004 12:19:07
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.138-143
  9. DiMarco, J.: Examining Bloom's Taxonomy and Peschl's Modes of Knowing for Classification of Learning Objects on the PBS.org/teachersource Website (2008) 0.09 
    0.09165722 = sum of:
  0.08364861 = product of:
    0.2509458 = sum of:
      0.2509458 = weight(_text_:objects in 2496) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.2509458 = score(doc=2496,freq=16.0), product of:
          0.30216965 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056851476 = queryNorm
          0.83047986 = fieldWeight in 2496, product of:
            4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
              16.0 = termFreq=16.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2496)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.00800861 = product of:
    0.02402583 = sum of:
      0.02402583 = weight(_text_:12 in 2496) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.02402583 = score(doc=2496,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15724345 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056851476 = queryNorm
          0.15279384 = fieldWeight in 2496, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2496)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Content
    The delivery of learning objects, small chunks of stand alone core components of reusable instruction (Nugent 2005) are used extensively in k-12 environments. Learning objects are videos and animated clips which are deployed in classrooms through public television companion websites. One such site is PBS. org/teachersource. Scholars and institutional reports (Schaffer & Douglas 2004, Nugent 2005, and PBS 2003) have identified challenges with learning objects lacking reliable pedagogical and curricular context due to the need for interpretation of raw materials by teachers and students (Nugent 2005). Technical challenges in learning objects include pedagogy and context relationships, issues with metadata in digital portals, and digital rights to content. This is a study of metadata representations of learning objects. The goal of this study was to propose and apply a comparative taxonomy to classify learning objects based on Bloom's Taxonomy in 2006 and Peschl's modes of knowing in 2007, thus adding to the discourse on taxonomies present in learning object repositories and knowledge-oriented educational processes existing in public broadcasting and educational new media content domains. In an effort to re-examine the data and conclusions, I matched Bloom's model against modes of knowing keywords put forth by Peschl (2006). Matching the Peschl model against the Bloom model provided a new template to use in determining the cognitive level of learning objectives embedded in PBS TeacherSource website learning objects.
  10. Cantara, L.: METS: the metadata encoding and transmission standard (2005) 0.09 
    0.08896638 = sum of:
  0.079356045 = product of:
    0.23806812 = sum of:
      0.23806812 = weight(_text_:objects in 5727) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.23806812 = score(doc=5727,freq=10.0), product of:
          0.30216965 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056851476 = queryNorm
          0.7878624 = fieldWeight in 5727, product of:
            3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
              10.0 = termFreq=10.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5727)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.009610333 = product of:
    0.028830996 = sum of:
      0.028830996 = weight(_text_:12 in 5727) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.028830996 = score(doc=5727,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15724345 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056851476 = queryNorm
          0.1833526 = fieldWeight in 5727, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5727)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    The Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard (METS) is a data communication standard for encoding descriptive, administrative, and structural metadata regarding objects within a digital library, expressed using the XML Schema Language of the World Wide Web Consortium. An initiative of the Digital Library Federation, METS is under development by an international editorial board and is maintained in the Network Development and MARC Standards Office of the Library of Congress. Designed in conformance with the Open Archival Information System (OAIS) Reference Model, a METS document encapsulates digital objects and metadata as Information Packages for transmitting and/or exchanging digital objects to and from digital repositories, disseminating digital objects via the Web, and archiving digital objects for long-term preservation and access. This paper presents an introduction to the METS standard and through illustrated examples, demonstrates how to build a METS document.
    Date
    5. 6.2001 12:25:05
  11. Kleiber, K.; Lindpointner, R.: DDC in Europa : Workshop "The use of the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) in Europe: recent developments and future perspectives" und "Meeting of the European DDC users' group" (2007) 0.09 
    0.08787586 = product of:
  0.17575172 = sum of:
    0.17575172 = sum of:
      0.1286569 = weight(_text_:abridged in 1286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.1286569 = score(doc=1286,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.4697581 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.2629 = idf(docFreq=30, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056851476 = queryNorm
          0.27387905 = fieldWeight in 1286, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.2629 = idf(docFreq=30, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1286)
      0.014415498 = weight(_text_:12 in 1286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.014415498 = score(doc=1286,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15724345 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056851476 = queryNorm
          0.0916763 = fieldWeight in 1286, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1286)
      0.032679323 = weight(_text_:22 in 1286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.032679323 = score(doc=1286,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.19908418 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056851476 = queryNorm
          0.16414827 = fieldWeight in 1286, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1286)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    "Am 11. und 12. Juni 2007 fand in der Schweizer Nationalbibliothek in Bern unter dem Titel: "EDUG 2007 - Die Verwendung der Dewey-Dezimalklassifikation (DDC) in Europa: Aktuelle Entwicklungen und Perspektiven für die Zukunft" das erste europäische DDC-Anwendertreffen in Europa statt (wobei 'EDUG' für European Dewey Users Group steht). Organisatoren der Tagung waren Elena Balzardi und Patrice Landry von der Schweizer Nationalbibliothek. Unter den 55 Teilnehmern, davon gut die Hälfte aus der Schweiz, waren u.a. Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare aus Großbritannien, Frankreich, Italien, Griechenland, Schweden und Norwegen. Aus den USA war Joan Mitchell, die Herausgeberin der DDC zugegen, aus Deutschland u.a. Magda Heiner-Freiling (Deutsche Nationalbibliothek) und aus Österreich Karin Kleiber (Nationalbibliothek) und Rudolf Lindpointner (00. Landesbibliothek). Am ersten Tag standen verschiedene Präsentationen zur Arbeit mit der DDC in Europa auf der Tagesordnung. Thema der ersten Vorträge von Federica Paradisi (Florenz), Anne-Celine Lambotte (Paris) und Heidrun Alex (Frankfurt) war die Verwendung von Dewey in Italien, Frankreich und Deutschland, Erfahrungen und Problematiken in einzelnen Bereichen. So wird z.B. in der Bibliothèque nationale de France DDC seit 1992 für die Freihand-Aufstellung verwendet und seit 2000 auch für die Neuzugänge im Magazin vergeben. In der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek werden seit Bibliografiejahrgang 2007 die Reihen A (Monografien und Periodika des Verlagsbuchhandels), B (Monografien und Periodika außerhalb des Verlagsbuchhandels) und H (Hochschulschriften) der Deutschen Nationalbibliografie mit vollständigen DDC-Notationen erschlossen. Probleme gibt es generell in den Bereichen des Rechts, des Erziehungssystems und bei der Archäologie (die BNP vergibt hier z.B. gegen die Regeln einen geographischen Zusatz).
    Der dann folgende Vortrag von Joan Mitchell mit dem programmatischen Titel "Locality and universality in the DDC" gab zuerst einen Überblick über die laufenden Übersetzungsprojekte, bezogen auf die Ed. 22, nämlich: Französisch, Italienisch, Spanisch, Griechisch, Arabisch und Chinesisch. Bezogen auf die Abridged Ed. 14 außerdem: Hebräisch und Vietnamesisch. Sie erwähnte auch den Einsatz von Dewey bei internationalen Projekten wie der "World Digital Library". Der zentrale Punkt des Vortrags betraf dann den Spagat zwischen ,Localization and Interoperability', d.h. zwischen Anpassung an regionale Gegebenheiten (wie z.B. Unterschiede in den Bereichen des Rechts- und Erziehungssystems) auf der einen Seite und Festhalten an der Durchgängigkeit der Bedeutung über alle Sprachen und Kulturen hinweg. Wie auch Magda Heiner-Freiling in ihrem Vortrag hinwies, hat sich die amerikanisch geprägte DDC im Zuge der Übersetzungsprojekte zwar schrittweise den Bedürfnissen der Benutzer in anderen Erdteilen geöffnet, dennoch bestehen noch zahlreiche Schwierigkeiten. Das von Heiner-Freiling erwähnte Beispiel der Pädagogik zeigte aber auch, dass Vorsicht bei Alleingängen auf nationaler Ebene geboten ist, da z.B. im Zuge des Bologna-Prozesses auch in Europa amerikanische institutionelle Strukturen und Terminologie im Bildungswesen Einzug halten. Weitere Vorträge befassten sich mit der Arbeit an elektronischen Verfahren zur automatischen Analyse von DDC-Notationen (Ulrike Reiner aus Göttingen), mit der DDC-Übersetzungs-Software, die für die Übersetzung ins Deutsche entwickelt wurde und nun auch in allen anderen Sprachen im Einsatz ist (Peter Werling, Fa. Pansoft) bzw. mit der DDC-Suche in verschiedenen Webportalen (Lars G. Svensson, DNB). Der abschließende Vortrag von Magda Heiner-Freiling (DNB) ging dann wieder ins Programmatische mit dem Vorschlag, eine gemeinsame European DDC Users Group (EDUG) zu gründen, um gemeinsame Anliegen der europäischen Dewey-User, was z.B. die anfangs erwähnten Probleme in einzelnen Bereichen betrifft, gemeinsam gegenüber den amerikanischen Herausgebern zu vertreten, um so mehr Einfluss auf die künftige Entwicklung der DDC zu haben.
    Wer sich näher für einzelne Themen interessiert, hat die Möglichkeit, auf der Homepage der Schweizer Nationalbibliothek die Präsentationsunterlagen der einzelnen Vorträge einzusehen (http://www.nb.admin.ch/slb/slb_professionnel/projektarbeit/00729/01615/01675/index.html?lang=de). Ziel des zweiten Tages war die Gründung einer europäischen DDC-Anwendergruppe zum Zweck der Vernetzung und Planung für die gemeinsame Entwicklungsarbeit. Anwesend waren Vertreterinnen der Nationalbibliotheken von Großbritannien, Deutschland, Frankreich, Schweden, Norwegen, Italien, Schweiz und Österreich sowie eine Vertreterin von OCLC. Eingeladen hatten die Nationalbibliotheken von Deutschland und der Schweiz. Vormittags wurde eine allgemeine Diskussion über die Ziele und Möglichkeiten einer solchen Anwendergruppe sowie allgemein über die Vorteile einer DDC-Anwendung in Europa diskutiert. Ziele von EDUG könnten sein: - Monitoring der europäischen DDC-Anwendungen - Kenntnis der unterschiedlichen Anwendungsregeln in den verschiedenen Ländern - Zugang auch zu den DDC-Übersetzungen in anderen Sprachen samt Expansionen - Zusammenarbeit beim Angebot von "built numbers" Zusammenarbeit mit OCLC als Vertreterin von europäischen Anliegen (die am Vortag ausführlich angesprochen worden waren) - Harmonisierung der Änderungen in den verschiedensprachigen Ausgaben (21./22. Ed., unterschiedliche Erweiterungen, anderer Sprachgebrauch) - Kooperation bei der Realisierung von technischen Plänen wie z.B. die automatische Klassifikation von Online-Dokumenten oder dem Mapping zu anderen Klassifikationssystemen - Weitergabe von Know-how und Erfahrungen an andere Interessierte Spontan wurden drei Arbeitsgruppen ins Leben gerufen, und zwar eine für technische Angelegenheiten und zwei inhaltliche für die kritischen Bereiche Recht und Erziehung. Nachmittags wurden die Satzungen von EDUG diskutiert und überarbeitet. Bei vielen Punkten wurde Übereinkunft erzielt. Einzelne Fragen blieben noch offen und sollen beim nächsten Treffen - wahrscheinlich im April 2008 in Frankfurt - endgültig fixiert werden."
  12. Winget, M.A.: Annotations on musical scores by performing musicians : collaborative models, interactive methods, and music digital library tool development (2008) 0.09 
    0.08552012 = sum of:
  0.035489097 = product of:
    0.106467284 = sum of:
      0.106467284 = weight(_text_:objects in 2368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.106467284 = score(doc=2368,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.30216965 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056851476 = queryNorm
          0.35234275 = fieldWeight in 2368, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2368)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.05003102 = product of:
    0.07504653 = sum of:
      0.028830996 = weight(_text_:12 in 2368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.028830996 = score(doc=2368,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15724345 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056851476 = queryNorm
          0.1833526 = fieldWeight in 2368, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2368)
      0.046215538 = weight(_text_:22 in 2368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.046215538 = score(doc=2368,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19908418 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056851476 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2368, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2368)
    0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Although there have been a number of fairly recent studies in which researchers have explored the information-seeking and management behaviors of people interacting with musical retrieval systems, there have been very few published studies of the interaction and use behaviors of musicians interacting with their primary information object, the musical score. The ethnographic research reported here seeks to correct this deficiency in the literature. In addition to observing rehearsals and conducting 22 in-depth musician interviews, this research provides in-depth analysis of 25,000 annotations representing 250 parts from 13 complete musical works, made by musicians of all skill levels and performance modes. In addition to producing specific and practical recommendations for digital-library development, this research also provides an augmented annotation framework that will enable more specific study of human-information interaction, both with musical scores, and with more general notational/instructional information objects.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.12, S.1878-1897
  13. Klas, C.-P.; Fuhr, N.; Schaefer, A.: Evaluating strategic support for information access in the DAFFODIL system (2004) 0.09 
    0.08552012 = sum of:
  0.035489097 = product of:
    0.106467284 = sum of:
      0.106467284 = weight(_text_:objects in 2419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.106467284 = score(doc=2419,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.30216965 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056851476 = queryNorm
          0.35234275 = fieldWeight in 2419, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2419)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.05003102 = product of:
    0.07504653 = sum of:
      0.028830996 = weight(_text_:12 in 2419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.028830996 = score(doc=2419,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15724345 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056851476 = queryNorm
          0.1833526 = fieldWeight in 2419, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2419)
      0.046215538 = weight(_text_:22 in 2419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.046215538 = score(doc=2419,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19908418 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056851476 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2419, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2419)
    0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    The digital library system Daffodil is targeted at strategic support of users during the information search process. For searching, exploring and managing digital library objects it provides user-customisable information seeking patterns over a federation of heterogeneous digital libraries. In this paper evaluation results with respect to retrieval effectiveness, efficiency and user satisfaction are presented. The analysis focuses on strategic support for the scientific work-flow. Daffodil supports the whole work-flow, from data source selection over information seeking to the representation, organisation and reuse of information. By embedding high level search functionality into the scientific work-flow, the user experiences better strategic system support due to a more systematic work process. These ideas have been implemented in Daffodil followed by a qualitative evaluation. The evaluation has been conducted with 28 participants, ranging from information seeking novices to experts. The results are promising, as they support the chosen model.
    Date
    16.11.2008 16:22:48
    Source
    Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 8th European conference, ECDL 2004, Bath, UK, September 12-17, 2004 : proceedings. Eds.: Heery, R. u. E. Lyon
  14. Kruk, S.R.; Kruk, E.; Stankiewicz, K.: Evaluation of semantic and social technologies for digital libraries (2009) 0.09 
    0.08552012 = sum of:
  0.035489097 = product of:
    0.106467284 = sum of:
      0.106467284 = weight(_text_:objects in 3387) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.106467284 = score(doc=3387,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.30216965 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056851476 = queryNorm
          0.35234275 = fieldWeight in 3387, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3387)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.05003102 = product of:
    0.07504653 = sum of:
      0.028830996 = weight(_text_:12 in 3387) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.028830996 = score(doc=3387,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15724345 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056851476 = queryNorm
          0.1833526 = fieldWeight in 3387, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3387)
      0.046215538 = weight(_text_:22 in 3387) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.046215538 = score(doc=3387,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19908418 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056851476 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3387, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3387)
    0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Libraries are the tools we use to learn and to answer our questions. The quality of our work depends, among others, on the quality of the tools we use. Recent research in digital libraries is focused, on one hand on improving the infrastructure of the digital library management systems (DLMS), and on the other on improving the metadata models used to annotate collections of objects maintained by DLMS. The latter includes, among others, the semantic web and social networking technologies. Recently, the semantic web and social networking technologies are being introduced to the digital libraries domain. The expected outcome is that the overall quality of information discovery in digital libraries can be improved by employing social and semantic technologies. In this chapter we present the results of an evaluation of social and semantic end-user information discovery services for the digital libraries.
    Date
    1. 8.2010 12:35:22
  15. Ku, L.-W.; Ho, H.-W.; Chen, H.-H.: Opinion mining and relationship discovery using CopeOpi opinion analysis system (2009) 0.08 
    0.08351682 = sum of:
  0.041824304 = product of:
    0.1254729 = sum of:
      0.1254729 = weight(_text_:objects in 2938) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.1254729 = score(doc=2938,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.30216965 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056851476 = queryNorm
          0.41523993 = fieldWeight in 2938, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2938)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.04169252 = product of:
    0.06253878 = sum of:
      0.02402583 = weight(_text_:12 in 2938) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.02402583 = score(doc=2938,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15724345 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056851476 = queryNorm
          0.15279384 = fieldWeight in 2938, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2938)
      0.03851295 = weight(_text_:22 in 2938) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03851295 = score(doc=2938,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19908418 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056851476 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2938, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2938)
    0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    We present CopeOpi, an opinion-analysis system, which extracts from the Web opinions about specific targets, summarizes the polarity and strength of these opinions, and tracks opinion variations over time. Objects that yield similar opinion tendencies over a certain time period may be correlated due to the latent causal events. CopeOpi discovers relationships among objects based on their opinion-tracking plots and collocations. Event bursts are detected from the tracking plots, and the strength of opinion relationships is determined by the coverage of these plots. To evaluate opinion mining, we use the NTCIR corpus annotated with opinion information at sentence and document levels. CopeOpi achieves sentence- and document-level f-measures of 62% and 74%. For relationship discovery, we collected 1.3M economics-related documents from 93 Web sources over 22 months, and analyzed collocation-based, opinion-based, and hybrid models. We consider as correlated company pairs that demonstrate similar stock-price variations, and selected these as the gold standard for evaluation. Results show that opinion-based and collocation-based models complement each other, and that integrated models perform the best. The top 25, 50, and 100 pairs discovered achieve precision rates of 1, 0.92, and 0.79, respectively.
    Date
    19. 7.2009 13:12:19
  16. Hjoerland, B.; Hartel, J.: Afterword: ontological, epistemological and sociological dimensions of domains (2003) 0.08 
    0.0829258 = sum of:
  0.071713746 = product of:
    0.21514122 = sum of:
      0.21514122 = weight(_text_:objects in 3014) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.21514122 = score(doc=3014,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.30216965 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056851476 = queryNorm
          0.7119882 = fieldWeight in 3014, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3014)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.011212054 = product of:
    0.03363616 = sum of:
      0.03363616 = weight(_text_:12 in 3014) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03363616 = score(doc=3014,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15724345 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056851476 = queryNorm
          0.21391137 = fieldWeight in 3014, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3014)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Domains are basically constituted of three kinds of theories and concepts: (1) ontological theories and concepts about the objects of human activity; (2) epistemological theories and concepts about knowledge and the ways to obtain knowledge, implying methodological principles about the ways objects are investigated; and (3) sociological concepts about the groups of people concerned with the objects. There are complicated relations between these elements. Basic theories about those relationships are, for example, forms of philosophical realism and social constructivism. In this paper these concepts and theories are introduced, and their implications for knowledge organization outlined, with illustrations drawn from this special issue of Knowledge Organization.
    Date
    10.12.2004 12:20:30
  17. Srinivasan, R.; Boast, R.; Becvar, K.M.; Furner, J.: Blobgects : digital museum catalogs and diverse user communities (2009) 0.08 
    0.07896768 = sum of:
  0.066130035 = product of:
    0.1983901 = sum of:
      0.1983901 = weight(_text_:objects in 2754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.1983901 = score(doc=2754,freq=10.0), product of:
          0.30216965 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056851476 = queryNorm
          0.656552 = fieldWeight in 2754, product of:
            3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
              10.0 = termFreq=10.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2754)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.01283765 = product of:
    0.03851295 = sum of:
      0.03851295 = weight(_text_:22 in 2754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03851295 = score(doc=2754,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19908418 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056851476 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2754, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2754)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    This article presents an exploratory study of Blobgects, an experimental interface for an online museum catalog that enables social tagging and blogging activity around a set of cultural heritage objects held by a preeminent museum of anthropology and archaeology. This study attempts to understand not just whether social tagging and commenting about these objects is useful but rather whose tags and voices matter in presenting different expert perspectives around digital museum objects. Based on an empirical comparison between two different user groups (Canadian Inuit high-school students and museum studies students in the United States), we found that merely adding the ability to tag and comment to the museum's catalog does not sufficiently allow users to learn about or engage with the objects represented by catalog entries. Rather, the specialist language of the catalog provides too little contextualization for users to enter into the sort of dialog that proponents of Web 2.0 technologies promise. Overall, we propose a more nuanced application of Web 2.0 technologies within museums - one which provides a contextual basis that gives users a starting point for engagement and permits users to make sense of objects in relation to their own needs, uses, and understandings.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 18:52:32
  18. Dewey, M.: Dewey Decimal Classification and relative index (2003) 0.08 
    0.07877805 = product of:
  0.1575561 = sum of:
    0.1575561 = sum of:
      0.10721408 = weight(_text_:abridged in 129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.10721408 = score(doc=129,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.4697581 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.2629 = idf(docFreq=30, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056851476 = queryNorm
          0.22823253 = fieldWeight in 129, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.2629 = idf(docFreq=30, maxDocs=44218)
            0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=129)
      0.016988827 = weight(_text_:12 in 129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.016988827 = score(doc=129,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.15724345 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056851476 = queryNorm
          0.108041555 = fieldWeight in 129, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
            0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=129)
      0.033353195 = weight(_text_:22 in 129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.033353195 = score(doc=129,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.19908418 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056851476 = queryNorm
          0.16753313 = fieldWeight in 129, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=129)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    12. 5.2012 18:38:45
    Footnote
    WebDewey (2003) and Abridged WebDewey (2004) are now only available an the Internet to licensed users. WebDewey is an enhanced version of the Dewey database of terms and numbers available in the print edition. Updated quarterly, it is only accessible via the Internet an an annual subscription basis. It provides much more facilities including key words navigation. Annotation feature allows cIassifiers to add and share notes about local classification changes. WebDewey is available within the full OCLC cataloguing services environment. It provides many access points with many search and browse Indexes. It makes the location of Dewey numbers an "easy" game. The annually updated Dewey for Windows an CD ceased publication in 2001; this decision may hurt the libraries in developing countries where the Internet, due to poor telecommunication infrastructure and unreliable services, is not easily accessible.
    Changes DDC22 is the second edition prepared by Joan S. Mitchell who took over as editor in 1993. It carries forward the policies and improvements started in DDC21, especially the onslaught an the Christian and western cultural blas in the schedules and tables. The plan for reducing Christian blas in 200 Religion, initiated in DDC21, has now been completed, with some additional provisions in 296 and 297. An outstanding change has been the abrogation of Table 7 Persons. The functions of Table 7 are now filled by using T1-08 and whatever notation is appropriate from 011-999. There are at least six places in the tables and 12 places in the schedules where the use of T7 was prescribed; what good the abolition of T7 has produced is not clear. In fact, it does make number building in some cases a bit circuitous, especially while using Table 3C. It has also resulted in the reuse of many DDC 21 numbers with new meanings. However, some numbers remain the same e.g., Social customs of artists 390.47 (both in DDC21 and DDC22). A few numbers have also become shorter in length. In compliance with the recommendations of D'Elia's survey, all works relating to directories of travel facilities such as hotels, lodges, Motels, inns, have been shifted to 910.46 and to 913/919 whereas 647.94 continues to be in place for general information about hotels. A common practice in previous editions, that is full class or extensive revisions (phoenix schedules), appear to have been discontinued in the preparation of DDC22. But minor changes are numerous. There are more than one thousand relocations and discontiuations of class numbers. Some 40 numbers have been reused. ... However, all these changes are not those projected as slated changes for DDC22 in the DDC21 (1996), namely in 520 Astronomy, 355-359 Military science, 636-639 Animal husbandry and 690 Buildings. Obviously the switch over to the DDC 22 will put less strain an libraries. There has been considerable improvement in the manual, now shifted to volume 1 of the print edition (pp. 1-182). Notes in the manual have been shortened by removing redundant information and by dividing them into smaller sections. Some information from the manual has been transferred to the schedules and tables, in the form of notes. The manual is now clearer and easier to read. Flow Charts, built-in numbers, and see also references should help classifiers achieve greater consistency. The relative index has been beefed up. With its 928 pages, it is 333 pages longer than the previous one, including new built-in numbers and many additional terms. The entry vocabulary is wide-based and current. DDC 22, the first edition of this millennium, has kept pace with the fast changing information environment to map and organize it squarely. To quote our friends at OCLC: knowledge is a big world, and they have organized it."
    Object
    DDC-22
  19. Panzer, M.: Designing identifiers for the DDC (2007) 0.08 
    0.07787296 = product of:
  0.15574592 = sum of:
    0.15574592 = product of:
      0.23361887 = sum of:
        0.18194832 = weight(_text_:abridged in 1752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18194832 = score(doc=1752,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.4697581 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.2629 = idf(docFreq=30, maxDocs=44218)
              0.056851476 = queryNorm
            0.38732344 = fieldWeight in 1752, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.2629 = idf(docFreq=30, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1752)
        0.051670548 = weight(_text_:22 in 1752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051670548 = score(doc=1752,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.19908418 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.056851476 = queryNorm
            0.2595412 = fieldWeight in 1752, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1752)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    "Although the Dewey Decimal Classification is currently available on the web to subscribers as WebDewey and Abridged WebDewey in the OCLC Connexion service and in an XML version to licensees, OCLC does not provide any "web services" based on the DDC. By web services, we mean presentation of the DDC to other machines (not humans) for uses such as searching, browsing, classifying, mapping, harvesting, and alerting. In order to build web-accessible services based on the DDC, several elements have to be considered. One of these elements is the design of an appropriate Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) structure for Dewey. The design goals of mapping the entity model of the DDC into an identifier space can be summarized as follows: * Common locator for Dewey concepts and associated resources for use in web services and web applications * Use-case-driven, but not directly related to and outlasting a specific use case (persistency) * Retraceable path to a concept rather than an abstract identification, reusing a means of identification that is already present in the DDC and available in existing metadata. We have been working closely with our colleagues in the OCLC Office of Research (especially Andy Houghton as well as Eric Childress, Diane Vizine-Goetz, and Stu Weibel) on a preliminary identifier syntax. The basic identifier format we are currently exploring is: http://dewey.info/{aspect}/{object}/{locale}/{type}/{version}/{resource} where * {aspect} is the aspect associated with an {object}-the current value set of aspect contains "concept", "scheme", and "index"; additional ones are under exploration * {object} is a type of {aspect} * {locale} identifies a Dewey translation * {type} identifies a Dewey edition type and contains, at a minimum, the values "edn" for the full edition or "abr" for the abridged edition * {version} identifies a Dewey edition version * {resource} identifies a resource associated with an {object} in the context of {locale}, {type}, and {version}
    Some examples of identifiers for concepts follow: <http://dewey.info/concept/338.4/en/edn/22/> This identifier is used to retrieve or identify the 338.4 concept in the English-language version of Edition 22. <http://dewey.info/concept/338.4/de/edn/22/> This identifier is used to retrieve or identify the 338.4 concept in the German-language version of Edition 22. <http://dewey.info/concept/333.7-333.9/> This identifier is used to retrieve or identify the 333.7-333.9 concept across all editions and language versions. <http://dewey.info/concept/333.7-333.9/about.skos> This identifier is used to retrieve a SKOS representation of the 333.7-333.9 concept (using the "resource" element). There are several open issues at this preliminary stage of development: Use cases: URIs need to represent the range of statements or questions that could be submitted to a Dewey web service. Therefore, it seems that some general questions have to be answered first: What information does an agent have when coming to a Dewey web service? What kind of questions will such an agent ask? Placement of the {locale} component: It is still an open question if the {locale} component should be placed after the {version} component instead (<http://dewey.info/concept/338.4/edn/22/en>) to emphasize that the most important instantiation of a Dewey class is its edition, not its language version. From a services point of view, however, it could make more sense to keep the current arrangement, because users are more likely to come to the service with a present understanding of the language version they are seeking without knowing the specifics of a certain edition in which they are trying to find topics. Identification of other Dewey entities: The goal is to create a locator that does not answer all, but a lot of questions that could be asked about the DDC. Which entities are missing but should be surfaced for services or user agents? How will those services or agents interact with them? Should some entities be rendered in a different way as presented? For example, (how) should the DDC Summaries be retrievable? Would it be necessary to make the DDC Manual accessible through this identifier structure?"
  20. Fan, J.; Gao, Y.; Luo, H.; Xu, G.: Automatic image automation by using concept-sensitive salient objects for image content representation (2004) 0.08 
    0.07516572 = sum of:
  0.059148498 = product of:
    0.17744549 = sum of:
      0.17744549 = weight(_text_:objects in 4128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.17744549 = score(doc=4128,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.30216965 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056851476 = queryNorm
          0.58723795 = fieldWeight in 4128, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4128)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.01601722 = product of:
    0.04805166 = sum of:
      0.04805166 = weight(_text_:12 in 4128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04805166 = score(doc=4128,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15724345 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056851476 = queryNorm
          0.30558768 = fieldWeight in 4128, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4128)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    12. 2.2005 14:27:19

Authors

Languages

Types

  • a 3125
  • m 434
  • el 288
  • s 141
  • x 70
  • b 27
  • r 27
  • i 23
  • n 12
  • p 4
  • fi 1
  • l 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications