Search (1001 results, page 3 of 51)

  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Suchenwirth, L.: Sacherschliessung in Zeiten von Corona : neue Herausforderungen und Chancen (2019) 0.03 
    0.027066985 = product of:
  0.05413397 = sum of:
    0.05413397 = product of:
      0.21653588 = sum of:
        0.21653588 = weight(_text_:3a in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21653588 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.38528278 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544495 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    https%3A%2F%2Fjournals.univie.ac.at%2Findex.php%2Fvoebm%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F5332%2F5271%2F&usg=AOvVaw2yQdFGHlmOwVls7ANCpTii.
  2. Hochschule im digitalen Zeitalter : Informationskompetenz neu begreifen - Prozesse anders steuern (2012) 0.03 
    0.02648073 = product of:
  0.05296146 = sum of:
    0.05296146 = sum of:
      0.028332809 = weight(_text_:g in 506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.028332809 = score(doc=506,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17068884 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04544495 = queryNorm
          0.165991 = fieldWeight in 506, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=506)
      0.024628652 = weight(_text_:22 in 506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.024628652 = score(doc=506,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15914047 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04544495 = queryNorm
          0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 506, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=506)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Die HRK sieht sich künftig für die bundesweite strategische Koordination des Handlungsfeldes "Informationskompetenz" verantwortlich. Um das Zusammenwirken an der Schnittstelle zwischen den Fakultäten bzw. Fachbereichen einerseits und den Bibliotheken und Rechenzentren andererseits zu verbessern, richtet die HRK eine Arbeitsgruppe ein, die Prozesse an der o. g. Schnittstelle jeweils mit Blick auf ausgewählte Fächer in regelmäßigen Zeitabständen begleitet und Vorschläge zur Verbesserung der Zusammenarbeit formuliert. Die Politik in Bund und Ländern sollte ihren Anteil am Aufbau solcher Strukturen leisten und die notwendigen Maßnahmen finanziell unterstützen.
    Date
    8.12.2012 17:22:26
  3. Engels, T.C.E; Istenic Starcic, A.; Kulczycki, E.; Pölönen, J.; Sivertsen, G.: Are book publications disappearing from scholarly communication in the social sciences and humanities? (2018) 0.03 
    0.02648073 = product of:
  0.05296146 = sum of:
    0.05296146 = sum of:
      0.028332809 = weight(_text_:g in 4631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.028332809 = score(doc=4631,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17068884 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04544495 = queryNorm
          0.165991 = fieldWeight in 4631, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4631)
      0.024628652 = weight(_text_:22 in 4631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.024628652 = score(doc=4631,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15914047 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04544495 = queryNorm
          0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 4631, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4631)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  4. Egghe, L.: ¬A good normalized impact and concentration measure (2014) 0.03 
    0.025042903 = product of:
  0.050085805 = sum of:
    0.050085805 = product of:
      0.10017161 = sum of:
        0.10017161 = weight(_text_:g in 1508) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10017161 = score(doc=1508,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17068884 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544495 = queryNorm
            0.5868668 = fieldWeight in 1508, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1508)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    It is shown that a normalized version of the g-index is a good normalized impact and concentration measure. A proposal for such a measure by Bartolucci is improved.
    Object
    g-index
  5. Karlsson, A.; Hammarfelt, B.; Steinhauer, H.J.; Falkman, G.; Olson, N.; Nelhans, G.; Nolin, J.: Modeling uncertainty in bibliometrics and information retrieval : an information fusion approach (2015) 0.03 
    0.025042903 = product of:
  0.050085805 = sum of:
    0.050085805 = product of:
      0.10017161 = sum of:
        0.10017161 = weight(_text_:g in 1696) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10017161 = score(doc=1696,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17068884 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544495 = queryNorm
            0.5868668 = fieldWeight in 1696, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1696)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  6. Irle, G.; Kattenbeck, M.: ISI 2015 Conference Review (2015) 0.02 
    0.024791209 = product of:
  0.049582418 = sum of:
    0.049582418 = product of:
      0.099164836 = sum of:
        0.099164836 = weight(_text_:g in 2315) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.099164836 = score(doc=2315,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17068884 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544495 = queryNorm
            0.5809685 = fieldWeight in 2315, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2315)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  7. Dewey, M.: Dewey Decimal Classification and relative index (2011) 0.02 
    0.024791209 = product of:
  0.049582418 = sum of:
    0.049582418 = product of:
      0.099164836 = sum of:
        0.099164836 = weight(_text_:g in 3079) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.099164836 = score(doc=3079,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17068884 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544495 = queryNorm
            0.5809685 = fieldWeight in 3079, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3079)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Editor
    Mitchell, J.S., J. Beall, R. Green, G. Martin u. M. Panzer
  8. Fröhlich, G.: Wissenszugang und Informationskompetenz für alle? : Zur ODOK 2010 in Leoben (Österreich) (2010) 0.02 
    0.024791209 = product of:
  0.049582418 = sum of:
    0.049582418 = product of:
      0.099164836 = sum of:
        0.099164836 = weight(_text_:g in 4058) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.099164836 = score(doc=4058,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17068884 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544495 = queryNorm
            0.5809685 = fieldWeight in 4058, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4058)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  9. Albrecht, R.; Meßmer, G.; Rusch, B.; Thiessen, P.: Katalogisierung in der Datenwolke (2016) 0.02 
    0.024791209 = product of:
  0.049582418 = sum of:
    0.049582418 = product of:
      0.099164836 = sum of:
        0.099164836 = weight(_text_:g in 3740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.099164836 = score(doc=3740,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17068884 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544495 = queryNorm
            0.5809685 = fieldWeight in 3740, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3740)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  10. Sieber, M.; Hupfer, G.: ¬Die Common Bibliographic Data Zone (CBDZ) : ein Werkstattbericht (2016) 0.02 
    0.024791209 = product of:
  0.049582418 = sum of:
    0.049582418 = product of:
      0.099164836 = sum of:
        0.099164836 = weight(_text_:g in 4959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.099164836 = score(doc=4959,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17068884 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544495 = queryNorm
            0.5809685 = fieldWeight in 4959, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4959)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  11. (2013 ff.) 0.02 
    0.024628652 = product of:
  0.049257305 = sum of:
    0.049257305 = product of:
      0.09851461 = sum of:
        0.09851461 = weight(_text_:22 in 2851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09851461 = score(doc=2851,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15914047 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544495 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2851, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2851)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  12. Visscher, A. De: Response to "remarks on the paper by a. De Visscher, 'what does the g-index really measure?' " (2013) 0.02 
    0.024536934 = product of:
  0.049073867 = sum of:
    0.049073867 = product of:
      0.098147735 = sum of:
        0.098147735 = weight(_text_:g in 1052) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.098147735 = score(doc=1052,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.17068884 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544495 = queryNorm
            0.5750097 = fieldWeight in 1052, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1052)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Vgl.: Visscher, A. De: What does the g-index really measure?. In: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.11, S.2290-2293.
    Object
    g-index
  13. Prathap, G.: Measures for impact, consistency, and the h- and g-indices (2014) 0.02 
    0.024536934 = product of:
  0.049073867 = sum of:
    0.049073867 = product of:
      0.098147735 = sum of:
        0.098147735 = weight(_text_:g in 1250) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.098147735 = score(doc=1250,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.17068884 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544495 = queryNorm
            0.5750097 = fieldWeight in 1250, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1250)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Object
    g-index
  14. Bartolucci, F.: ¬A comparison between the g-index and the h-index based on concentration (2015) 0.02 
    0.024536934 = product of:
  0.049073867 = sum of:
    0.049073867 = product of:
      0.098147735 = sum of:
        0.098147735 = weight(_text_:g in 2350) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.098147735 = score(doc=2350,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.17068884 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544495 = queryNorm
            0.5750097 = fieldWeight in 2350, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2350)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    I discuss how, given a certain number of articles and citations of these articles, the h-index and the g-index are affected by the level of concentration of the citations. This offers the opportunity for a comparison between these 2 indices from a new perspective.
    Object
    g-index
  15. Abramo, G.; D'Angelo, C.A.; Viel, F.: Assessing the accuracy of the h- and g-indexes for measuring researchers' productivity (2013) 0.02 
    0.023757784 = product of:
  0.047515567 = sum of:
    0.047515567 = product of:
      0.095031135 = sum of:
        0.095031135 = weight(_text_:g in 957) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.095031135 = score(doc=957,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.17068884 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544495 = queryNorm
            0.5567507 = fieldWeight in 957, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=957)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Bibliometric indicators are increasingly used in support of decisions about recruitment, career advancement, rewards, and selective funding for scientists. Given the importance of the applications, bibliometricians are obligated to carry out empirical testing of the robustness of the indicators, in simulations of real contexts. In this work, we compare the results of national-scale research assessments at the individual level, based on the following three different indexes: the h-index, the g-index, and "fractional scientific strength" (FSS), an indicator previously proposed by the authors. For each index, we construct and compare rankings lists of all Italian academic researchers working in the hard sciences during the period 2001-2005. The analysis quantifies the shifts in ranks that occur when researchers' productivity rankings by simple indicators such as the h- or g-indexes are compared with those by more accurate FSS.
    Object
    g-index
  16. Visscher, A. De: What does the g-index really measure? (2011) 0.02 
    0.02342549 = product of:
  0.04685098 = sum of:
    0.04685098 = product of:
      0.09370196 = sum of:
        0.09370196 = weight(_text_:g in 1053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09370196 = score(doc=1053,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.17068884 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544495 = queryNorm
            0.5489636 = fieldWeight in 1053, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1053)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    It was argued recently that the g-index is a measure of a researcher's specific impact (i.e., impact per paper) as much as it is a measure of overall impact. While this is true for the productive "core" of publications, it can be argued that the g-index does not differ from the square root of the total number of citations in a bibliometrically meaningful way when the entire publication list is considered. The R-index also has a tendency to follow total impact, leaving only the A-index as a true measure of specific impact. The main difference between the g-index and the h-index is that the former penalizes consistency of impact whereas the latter rewards such consistency. It is concluded that the h-index is a better bibliometric tool than is the g-index, and that the square root of the total number of citations is a convenient measure of a researcher's overall impact.
    Footnote
    Vgl.: Visscher, A. De: Response to "remarks on the paper by a. De Visscher, 'what does the g-index really measure?' ". In: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2013) no.9, S.1960-1962.
    Object
    g-index
  17. Farazi, M.: Faceted lightweight ontologies : a formalization and some experiments (2010) 0.02 
    0.02255582 = product of:
  0.04511164 = sum of:
    0.04511164 = product of:
      0.18044657 = sum of:
        0.18044657 = weight(_text_:3a in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18044657 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.38528278 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544495 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    PhD Dissertation at International Doctorate School in Information and Communication Technology. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fcore.ac.uk%2Fdownload%2Fpdf%2F150083013.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2n-qisNagpyT0lli_6QbAQ.
  18. Shala, E.: ¬Die Autonomie des Menschen und der Maschine : gegenwärtige Definitionen von Autonomie zwischen philosophischem Hintergrund und technologischer Umsetzbarkeit (2014) 0.02 
    0.02255582 = product of:
  0.04511164 = sum of:
    0.04511164 = product of:
      0.18044657 = sum of:
        0.18044657 = weight(_text_:3a in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18044657 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.38528278 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544495 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Vgl. unter: https://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwizweHljdbcAhVS16QKHXcFD9QQFjABegQICRAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Fpublication%2F271200105_Die_Autonomie_des_Menschen_und_der_Maschine_-_gegenwartige_Definitionen_von_Autonomie_zwischen_philosophischem_Hintergrund_und_technologischer_Umsetzbarkeit_Redigierte_Version_der_Magisterarbeit_Karls&usg=AOvVaw06orrdJmFF2xbCCp_hL26q.
  19. Piros, A.: Az ETO-jelzetek automatikus interpretálásának és elemzésének kérdései (2018) 0.02 
    0.02255582 = product of:
  0.04511164 = sum of:
    0.04511164 = product of:
      0.18044657 = sum of:
        0.18044657 = weight(_text_:3a in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18044657 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.38528278 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544495 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl. auch: New automatic interpreter for complex UDC numbers. Unter: <https%3A%2F%2Fudcc.org%2Ffiles%2FAttilaPiros_EC_36-37_2014-2015.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3kc9CwDDCWP7aArpfjrs5b>
  20. Schöne neue Welt? : Fragen und Antworten: Wie Facebook menschliche Gedanken auslesen will (2017) 0.02 
    0.021768859 = product of:
  0.043537717 = sum of:
    0.043537717 = product of:
      0.087075435 = sum of:
        0.087075435 = weight(_text_:22 in 2810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.087075435 = score(doc=2810,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15914047 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544495 = queryNorm
            0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 2810, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2810)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 7.2004 9:42:33
    22. 4.2017 11:58:05

Authors

Languages

  • e 727
  • d 262
  • a 1
  • f 1
  • hu 1
  • i 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 873
  • el 95
  • m 74
  • s 30
  • x 12
  • r 7
  • b 5
  • i 1
  • z 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications