Search (719 results, page 1 of 36)

  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Youlin, Z.; Baptista Nunes, J.M.; Zhonghua, D.: Construction and evolution of a Chinese Information Science and Information Service (CIS&IS) onto-thesaurus (2014) 0.12
    0.115927756 = product of:
      0.17389163 = sum of:
        0.11862896 = product of:
          0.23725791 = sum of:
            0.23725791 = weight(_text_:nunes in 1376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.23725791 = score(doc=1376,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.40104246 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.924298 = idf(docFreq=15, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044938263 = queryNorm
                0.591603 = fieldWeight in 1376, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.924298 = idf(docFreq=15, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1376)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.05526267 = product of:
          0.11052534 = sum of:
            0.11052534 = weight(_text_:j.m in 1376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11052534 = score(doc=1376,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.27372277 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044938263 = queryNorm
                0.4037857 = fieldWeight in 1376, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1376)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
  2. Budd, J.M.: ¬A reply to Lingard (2013) 0.08
    0.079121634 = product of:
      0.118682444 = sum of:
        0.063419774 = product of:
          0.19025931 = sum of:
            0.19025931 = weight(_text_:author's in 1762) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.19025931 = score(doc=1762,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.30199203 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044938263 = queryNorm
                0.63001436 = fieldWeight in 1762, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1762)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.05526267 = product of:
          0.11052534 = sum of:
            0.11052534 = weight(_text_:j.m in 1762) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11052534 = score(doc=1762,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.27372277 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044938263 = queryNorm
                0.4037857 = fieldWeight in 1762, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1762)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of the paper is to provide a critical reply to Robert Lingard's close reading of a previously published paper of the present author's, "Meaning, truth, and information." Design/methodology/approach - The approach adopted in this paper is an examination of Lingard's argument and counter-points, employing (primarily) logical and rhetorical analysis of his claims. Findings - While some of Lingard's criticisms are legitimate and must be admitted, many have to be subjected to rebuttal on the basis of misreading, logical error, and discursive misapprehension of points made in the original article. Originality/value - Since the present paper is a reply to another author's work, originality is constrained by the arguments and claims made by that author. That said, additional analysis is added to the matters of meaning, truth, and information in an effort to clarify and expand upon the essence of the original article.
  3. Chen, H.; Baptista Nunes, J.M.; Ragsdell, G.; An, X.: Somatic and cultural knowledge : drivers of a habitus-driven model of tacit knowledge acquisition (2019) 0.07
    0.067624524 = product of:
      0.10143678 = sum of:
        0.069200225 = product of:
          0.13840045 = sum of:
            0.13840045 = weight(_text_:nunes in 5460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13840045 = score(doc=5460,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.40104246 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.924298 = idf(docFreq=15, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044938263 = queryNorm
                0.34510174 = fieldWeight in 5460, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.924298 = idf(docFreq=15, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=5460)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.032236557 = product of:
          0.064473115 = sum of:
            0.064473115 = weight(_text_:j.m in 5460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.064473115 = score(doc=5460,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.27372277 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044938263 = queryNorm
                0.23554166 = fieldWeight in 5460, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=5460)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
  4. Campanario, J.M.: Large increases and decreases in journal impact factors in only one year : the effect of journal self-citations (2011) 0.06
    0.05718861 = product of:
      0.17156583 = sum of:
        0.17156583 = sum of:
          0.12894623 = weight(_text_:j.m in 4187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.12894623 = score(doc=4187,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.27372277 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044938263 = queryNorm
              0.4710833 = fieldWeight in 4187, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4187)
          0.0426196 = weight(_text_:22 in 4187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0426196 = score(doc=4187,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15736614 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044938263 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4187, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4187)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2011 12:53:00
  5. Arbelaitz, O.; Martínez-Otzeta. J.M.; Muguerza, J.: User modeling in a social network for cognitively disabled people (2016) 0.05
    0.04901881 = product of:
      0.14705643 = sum of:
        0.14705643 = sum of:
          0.11052534 = weight(_text_:j.m in 2639) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11052534 = score(doc=2639,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.27372277 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044938263 = queryNorm
              0.4037857 = fieldWeight in 2639, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2639)
          0.036531083 = weight(_text_:22 in 2639) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.036531083 = score(doc=2639,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15736614 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044938263 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2639, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2639)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2016 12:02:26
  6. Erickson, L.B.; Wisniewski, P.; Xu, H.; Carroll, J.M.; Rosson, M.B.; Perkins, D.F.: ¬The boundaries between : parental involvement in a teen's online world (2016) 0.05
    0.04901881 = product of:
      0.14705643 = sum of:
        0.14705643 = sum of:
          0.11052534 = weight(_text_:j.m in 2932) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11052534 = score(doc=2932,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.27372277 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044938263 = queryNorm
              0.4037857 = fieldWeight in 2932, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2932)
          0.036531083 = weight(_text_:22 in 2932) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.036531083 = score(doc=2932,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15736614 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044938263 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2932, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2932)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    7. 5.2016 20:05:22
  7. Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011) 0.05
    0.04758258 = product of:
      0.14274774 = sum of:
        0.14274774 = product of:
          0.42824322 = sum of:
            0.42824322 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.42824322 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.38098708 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044938263 = queryNorm
                1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
  8. Castle, C.: Getting the central RDM message across : a case study of central versus discipline-specific Research Data Services (RDS) at the University of Cambridge (2019) 0.05
    0.045380734 = product of:
      0.0680711 = sum of:
        0.05284981 = product of:
          0.15854943 = sum of:
            0.15854943 = weight(_text_:author's in 5491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.15854943 = score(doc=5491,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.30199203 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044938263 = queryNorm
                0.52501196 = fieldWeight in 5491, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5491)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.015221286 = product of:
          0.030442571 = sum of:
            0.030442571 = weight(_text_:22 in 5491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030442571 = score(doc=5491,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15736614 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044938263 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5491, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5491)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    RDS are usually cross-disciplinary, centralised services, which are increasingly provided at a university by the academic library and in collaboration with other RDM stakeholders, such as the Research Office. At research-intensive universities, research data is generated in a wide range of disciplines and sub-disciplines. This paper will discuss how providing discipline-specific RDM support is approached by such universities and academic libraries, and the advantages and disadvantages of these central and discipline-specific approaches. A descriptive case study on the author's experiences of collaborating with a central RDS at the University of Cambridge, as a subject librarian embedded in an academic department, is a major component of this paper. The case study describes how centralised RDM services offered by the Office of Scholarly Communication (OSC) have been adapted to meet discipline-specific needs in the Department of Chemistry. It will introduce the department and the OSC, and describe the author's role in delivering RDM training, as well as the Data Champions programme, and their membership of the RDM Project Group. It will describe the outcomes of this collaboration for the Department of Chemistry, and for the centralised service. Centralised and discipline-specific approaches to RDS provision have their own advantages and disadvantages. Supporting the discipline-specific RDM needs of researchers is proving particularly challenging for universities to address sustainably: it requires adequate financial resources and staff skilled (or re-skilled) in RDM. A mixed approach is the most desirable, cost-effective way of providing RDS, but this still has constraints.
    Date
    7. 9.2019 21:30:22
  9. Zhang, Y.: Developing a holistic model for digital library evaluation (2010) 0.04
    0.0420734 = product of:
      0.0631101 = sum of:
        0.044844553 = product of:
          0.13453366 = sum of:
            0.13453366 = weight(_text_:author's in 2360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13453366 = score(doc=2360,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.30199203 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044938263 = queryNorm
                0.44548744 = fieldWeight in 2360, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2360)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.018265542 = product of:
          0.036531083 = sum of:
            0.036531083 = weight(_text_:22 in 2360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036531083 = score(doc=2360,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15736614 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044938263 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2360, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2360)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This article reports the author's recent research in developing a holistic model for various levels of digital library (DL) evaluation in which perceived important criteria from heterogeneous stakeholder groups are organized and presented. To develop such a model, the author applied a three-stage research approach: exploration, confirmation, and verification. During the exploration stage, a literature review was conducted followed by an interview, along with a card sorting technique, to collect important criteria perceived by DL experts. Then the criteria identified were used for developing an online survey during the confirmation stage. Survey respondents (431 in total) from 22 countries rated the importance of the criteria. A holistic DL evaluation model was constructed using statistical techniques. Eventually, the verification stage was devised to test the reliability of the model in the context of searching and evaluating an operational DL. The proposed model fills two lacunae in the DL domain: (a) the lack of a comprehensive and flexible framework to guide and benchmark evaluations, and (b) the uncertainty about what divergence exists among heterogeneous DL stakeholders, including general users.
  10. Hjoerland, B.: ¬The importance of theories of knowledge : indexing and information retrieval as an example (2011) 0.04
    0.0420734 = product of:
      0.0631101 = sum of:
        0.044844553 = product of:
          0.13453366 = sum of:
            0.13453366 = weight(_text_:author's in 4359) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13453366 = score(doc=4359,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.30199203 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044938263 = queryNorm
                0.44548744 = fieldWeight in 4359, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4359)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.018265542 = product of:
          0.036531083 = sum of:
            0.036531083 = weight(_text_:22 in 4359) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036531083 = score(doc=4359,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15736614 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044938263 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4359, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4359)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    A recent study in information science (IS), raises important issues concerning the value of human indexing and basic theories of indexing and information retrieval, as well as the use of quantitative and qualitative approaches in IS and the underlying theories of knowledge informing the field. The present article uses L&E as the point of departure for demonstrating in what way more social and interpretative understandings may provide fruitful improvements for research in indexing, knowledge organization, and information retrieval. The artcle is motivated by the observation that philosophical contributions tend to be ignored in IS if they are not directly formed as criticisms or invitations to dialogs. It is part of the author's ongoing publication of articles about philosophical issues in IS and it is intended to be followed by analyzes of other examples of contributions to core issues in IS. Although it is formulated as a criticism of a specific paper, it should be seen as part of a general discussion of the philosophical foundation of IS and as a support to the emerging social paradigm in this field.
    Date
    17. 3.2011 19:22:55
  11. Open MIND (2015) 0.04
    0.040849008 = product of:
      0.122547016 = sum of:
        0.122547016 = sum of:
          0.09210444 = weight(_text_:j.m in 1648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09210444 = score(doc=1648,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.27372277 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044938263 = queryNorm
              0.33648807 = fieldWeight in 1648, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1648)
          0.030442571 = weight(_text_:22 in 1648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030442571 = score(doc=1648,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15736614 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044938263 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1648, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1648)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    27. 1.2015 11:48:22
    Editor
    Metzinger, T. u.. J.M. Windt
  12. Belém, F.M.; Almeida, J.M.; Gonçalves, M.A.: ¬A survey on tag recommendation methods : a review (2017) 0.04
    0.040849008 = product of:
      0.122547016 = sum of:
        0.122547016 = sum of:
          0.09210444 = weight(_text_:j.m in 3524) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09210444 = score(doc=3524,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.27372277 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044938263 = queryNorm
              0.33648807 = fieldWeight in 3524, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3524)
          0.030442571 = weight(_text_:22 in 3524) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030442571 = score(doc=3524,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15736614 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044938263 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3524, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3524)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    16.11.2017 13:30:22
  13. Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014) 0.04
    0.039652154 = product of:
      0.11895646 = sum of:
        0.11895646 = product of:
          0.35686937 = sum of:
            0.35686937 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.35686937 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.38098708 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044938263 = queryNorm
                0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
  14. Stringer, M.J.; Sales-Pardo, M.; Nunes Amaral, L.A.: Statistical validation of a global model for the distribution of the ultimate number of citations accrued by papers published in a scientific journal (2010) 0.04
    0.039542988 = product of:
      0.11862896 = sum of:
        0.11862896 = product of:
          0.23725791 = sum of:
            0.23725791 = weight(_text_:nunes in 3583) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.23725791 = score(doc=3583,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.40104246 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.924298 = idf(docFreq=15, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044938263 = queryNorm
                0.591603 = fieldWeight in 3583, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.924298 = idf(docFreq=15, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3583)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  15. Fernández-Luna, J.M.; Huete, J.F.; Castells, P.: Personalization and recommendation in information access (2013) 0.04
    0.03684178 = product of:
      0.11052534 = sum of:
        0.11052534 = product of:
          0.22105068 = sum of:
            0.22105068 = weight(_text_:j.m in 2712) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.22105068 = score(doc=2712,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.27372277 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044938263 = queryNorm
                0.8075714 = fieldWeight in 2712, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2712)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  16. Nunes, S.; Ribeiro, C.; David, G.: Term weighting based on document revision history (2011) 0.03
    0.03295249 = product of:
      0.09885747 = sum of:
        0.09885747 = product of:
          0.19771494 = sum of:
            0.19771494 = weight(_text_:nunes in 4946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.19771494 = score(doc=4946,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.40104246 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.924298 = idf(docFreq=15, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044938263 = queryNorm
                0.4930025 = fieldWeight in 4946, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.924298 = idf(docFreq=15, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4946)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  17. Brunetti, J.M.; Roberto García, R.: User-centered design and evaluation of overview components for semantic data exploration (2014) 0.03
    0.032679208 = product of:
      0.098037615 = sum of:
        0.098037615 = sum of:
          0.07368356 = weight(_text_:j.m in 1626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07368356 = score(doc=1626,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.27372277 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044938263 = queryNorm
              0.26919046 = fieldWeight in 1626, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1626)
          0.024354057 = weight(_text_:22 in 1626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.024354057 = score(doc=1626,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15736614 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044938263 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1626, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1626)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  18. Campanario, J.M.: Distribution of ranks of articles and citations in journals (2010) 0.03
    0.03070148 = product of:
      0.09210444 = sum of:
        0.09210444 = product of:
          0.18420888 = sum of:
            0.18420888 = weight(_text_:j.m in 3340) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.18420888 = score(doc=3340,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.27372277 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044938263 = queryNorm
                0.67297614 = fieldWeight in 3340, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3340)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  19. Martín-Martín, A.; Ayllón, J.M.; López-Cózar, E.D.; Orduna-Malea, E.: Nature's top 100 Re-revisited (2015) 0.03
    0.03070148 = product of:
      0.09210444 = sum of:
        0.09210444 = product of:
          0.18420888 = sum of:
            0.18420888 = weight(_text_:j.m in 2352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.18420888 = score(doc=2352,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.27372277 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044938263 = queryNorm
                0.67297614 = fieldWeight in 2352, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2352)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  20. Gödert, W.; Lepsky, K.: Informationelle Kompetenz : ein humanistischer Entwurf (2019) 0.03
    0.027756508 = product of:
      0.08326952 = sum of:
        0.08326952 = product of:
          0.24980856 = sum of:
            0.24980856 = weight(_text_:3a in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.24980856 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.38098708 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044938263 = queryNorm
                0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Philosophisch-ethische Rezensionen vom 09.11.2019 (Jürgen Czogalla), Unter: https://philosophisch-ethische-rezensionen.de/rezension/Goedert1.html. In: B.I.T. online 23(2020) H.3, S.345-347 (W. Sühl-Strohmenger) [Unter: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.b-i-t-online.de%2Fheft%2F2020-03-rezensionen.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0iY3f_zNcvEjeZ6inHVnOK]. In: Open Password Nr. 805 vom 14.08.2020 (H.-C. Hobohm) [Unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzE0MywiOGI3NjZkZmNkZjQ1IiwwLDAsMTMxLDFd].

Authors

Languages

  • e 530
  • d 181
  • a 1
  • hu 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 632
  • el 60
  • m 45
  • s 16
  • x 12
  • r 7
  • b 5
  • i 1
  • z 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications