Search (685 results, page 1 of 35)

  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Foskett, D.J.: Systems theory and its relevance to documentary classification (2017) 0.18
    0.18495484 = product of:
      0.36990967 = sum of:
        0.36990967 = sum of:
          0.290915 = weight(_text_:d.j in 3176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.290915 = score(doc=3176,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.32651314 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04858716 = queryNorm
              0.8909749 = fieldWeight in 3176, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3176)
          0.07899467 = weight(_text_:22 in 3176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07899467 = score(doc=3176,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17014395 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04858716 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3176, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3176)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    6. 5.2017 18:46:22
  2. Brown, D.J.: Access to scientific research : challenges facing communications in STM (2016) 0.06
    0.061651614 = product of:
      0.12330323 = sum of:
        0.12330323 = sum of:
          0.09697167 = weight(_text_:d.j in 3769) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09697167 = score(doc=3769,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.32651314 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04858716 = queryNorm
              0.29699162 = fieldWeight in 3769, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3769)
          0.026331557 = weight(_text_:22 in 3769) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.026331557 = score(doc=3769,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17014395 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04858716 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3769, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3769)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Inhalt: Chapter 1. Background -- Chapter 2. Definitions -- Chapter 3. Aims, Objectives, and Methodology -- Chapter 4. Setting the Scene -- Chapter 5. Information Society -- Chapter 6. Drivers for Change -- Chapter 7 A Dysfunctional STM Scene? -- Chapter 8. Comments on the Dysfunctionality of STM Publishing -- Chapter 9. The Main Stakeholders -- Chapter 10. Search and Discovery -- Chapter 11. Impact of Google -- Chapter 12. Psychological Issues -- Chapter 13. Users of Research Output -- Chapter 14. Underlying Sociological Developments -- Chapter 15. Social Media and Social Networking -- Chapter 16. Forms of Article Delivery -- Chapter 17. Future Communication Trends -- Chapter 18. Academic Knowledge Workers -- Chapter 19. Unaffiliated Knowledge Workers -- Chapter 20. The Professions -- Chapter 21. Small and Medium Enterprises -- Chapter 22. Citizen Scientists -- Chapter 23. Learned Societies -- Chapter 24. Business Models -- Chapter 25. Open Access -- Chapter 26. Political Initiatives -- Chapter 27. Summary and Conclusions -- Chapter 28. Research Questions Addressed
  3. Castle, C.: Getting the central RDM message across : a case study of central versus discipline-specific Research Data Services (RDS) at the University of Cambridge (2019) 0.06
    0.059313048 = sum of:
      0.042855825 = product of:
        0.1714233 = sum of:
          0.1714233 = weight(_text_:author's in 5491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.1714233 = score(doc=5491,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.32651314 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04858716 = queryNorm
              0.52501196 = fieldWeight in 5491, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5491)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.016457222 = product of:
        0.032914445 = sum of:
          0.032914445 = weight(_text_:22 in 5491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.032914445 = score(doc=5491,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17014395 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04858716 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5491, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5491)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    RDS are usually cross-disciplinary, centralised services, which are increasingly provided at a university by the academic library and in collaboration with other RDM stakeholders, such as the Research Office. At research-intensive universities, research data is generated in a wide range of disciplines and sub-disciplines. This paper will discuss how providing discipline-specific RDM support is approached by such universities and academic libraries, and the advantages and disadvantages of these central and discipline-specific approaches. A descriptive case study on the author's experiences of collaborating with a central RDS at the University of Cambridge, as a subject librarian embedded in an academic department, is a major component of this paper. The case study describes how centralised RDM services offered by the Office of Scholarly Communication (OSC) have been adapted to meet discipline-specific needs in the Department of Chemistry. It will introduce the department and the OSC, and describe the author's role in delivering RDM training, as well as the Data Champions programme, and their membership of the RDM Project Group. It will describe the outcomes of this collaboration for the Department of Chemistry, and for the centralised service. Centralised and discipline-specific approaches to RDS provision have their own advantages and disadvantages. Supporting the discipline-specific RDM needs of researchers is proving particularly challenging for universities to address sustainably: it requires adequate financial resources and staff skilled (or re-skilled) in RDM. A mixed approach is the most desirable, cost-effective way of providing RDS, but this still has constraints.
    Date
    7. 9.2019 21:30:22
  4. Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011) 0.06
    0.057876963 = product of:
      0.11575393 = sum of:
        0.11575393 = product of:
          0.4630157 = sum of:
            0.4630157 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.4630157 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.41192245 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04858716 = queryNorm
                1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
  5. Zhang, Y.: Developing a holistic model for digital library evaluation (2010) 0.06
    0.056113042 = sum of:
      0.036364377 = product of:
        0.1454575 = sum of:
          0.1454575 = weight(_text_:author's in 2360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.1454575 = score(doc=2360,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.32651314 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04858716 = queryNorm
              0.44548744 = fieldWeight in 2360, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2360)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.019748667 = product of:
        0.039497335 = sum of:
          0.039497335 = weight(_text_:22 in 2360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.039497335 = score(doc=2360,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17014395 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04858716 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2360, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2360)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This article reports the author's recent research in developing a holistic model for various levels of digital library (DL) evaluation in which perceived important criteria from heterogeneous stakeholder groups are organized and presented. To develop such a model, the author applied a three-stage research approach: exploration, confirmation, and verification. During the exploration stage, a literature review was conducted followed by an interview, along with a card sorting technique, to collect important criteria perceived by DL experts. Then the criteria identified were used for developing an online survey during the confirmation stage. Survey respondents (431 in total) from 22 countries rated the importance of the criteria. A holistic DL evaluation model was constructed using statistical techniques. Eventually, the verification stage was devised to test the reliability of the model in the context of searching and evaluating an operational DL. The proposed model fills two lacunae in the DL domain: (a) the lack of a comprehensive and flexible framework to guide and benchmark evaluations, and (b) the uncertainty about what divergence exists among heterogeneous DL stakeholders, including general users.
  6. Hjoerland, B.: ¬The importance of theories of knowledge : indexing and information retrieval as an example (2011) 0.06
    0.056113042 = sum of:
      0.036364377 = product of:
        0.1454575 = sum of:
          0.1454575 = weight(_text_:author's in 4359) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.1454575 = score(doc=4359,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.32651314 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04858716 = queryNorm
              0.44548744 = fieldWeight in 4359, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4359)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.019748667 = product of:
        0.039497335 = sum of:
          0.039497335 = weight(_text_:22 in 4359) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.039497335 = score(doc=4359,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17014395 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04858716 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4359, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4359)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    A recent study in information science (IS), raises important issues concerning the value of human indexing and basic theories of indexing and information retrieval, as well as the use of quantitative and qualitative approaches in IS and the underlying theories of knowledge informing the field. The present article uses L&E as the point of departure for demonstrating in what way more social and interpretative understandings may provide fruitful improvements for research in indexing, knowledge organization, and information retrieval. The artcle is motivated by the observation that philosophical contributions tend to be ignored in IS if they are not directly formed as criticisms or invitations to dialogs. It is part of the author's ongoing publication of articles about philosophical issues in IS and it is intended to be followed by analyzes of other examples of contributions to core issues in IS. Although it is formulated as a criticism of a specific paper, it should be seen as part of a general discussion of the philosophical foundation of IS and as a support to the emerging social paradigm in this field.
    Date
    17. 3.2011 19:22:55
  7. Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014) 0.05
    0.048230805 = product of:
      0.09646161 = sum of:
        0.09646161 = product of:
          0.38584644 = sum of:
            0.38584644 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.38584644 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.41192245 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04858716 = queryNorm
                0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
  8. Foskett, D.J.: Systems theory and its relevance to documentary classification (2017) 0.04
    0.042425103 = product of:
      0.08485021 = sum of:
        0.08485021 = product of:
          0.16970041 = sum of:
            0.16970041 = weight(_text_:d.j in 3617) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.16970041 = score(doc=3617,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.32651314 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04858716 = queryNorm
                0.51973534 = fieldWeight in 3617, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3617)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  9. Saab, D.J.; Riss, U.V.: Information as ontologization (2011) 0.04
    0.036364377 = product of:
      0.07272875 = sum of:
        0.07272875 = product of:
          0.1454575 = sum of:
            0.1454575 = weight(_text_:d.j in 4925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1454575 = score(doc=4925,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.32651314 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04858716 = queryNorm
                0.44548744 = fieldWeight in 4925, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4925)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  10. Solomon, D.J.; Björk, B.-C.: ¬A study of open access journals using article processing charges (2012) 0.04
    0.036364377 = product of:
      0.07272875 = sum of:
        0.07272875 = product of:
          0.1454575 = sum of:
            0.1454575 = weight(_text_:d.j in 365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1454575 = score(doc=365,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.32651314 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04858716 = queryNorm
                0.44548744 = fieldWeight in 365, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=365)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  11. Stvilia, B.; Hinnant, C.C.; Wu, S.; Worrall, A.; Lee, D.J.; Burnett, K.; Burnett, G.; Kazmer, M.M.; Marty, P.F.: Research project tasks, data, and perceptions of data quality in a condensed matter physics community (2015) 0.04
    0.036364377 = product of:
      0.07272875 = sum of:
        0.07272875 = product of:
          0.1454575 = sum of:
            0.1454575 = weight(_text_:d.j in 1631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1454575 = score(doc=1631,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.32651314 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04858716 = queryNorm
                0.44548744 = fieldWeight in 1631, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1631)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  12. Gödert, W.; Lepsky, K.: Informationelle Kompetenz : ein humanistischer Entwurf (2019) 0.03
    0.033761565 = product of:
      0.06752313 = sum of:
        0.06752313 = product of:
          0.27009252 = sum of:
            0.27009252 = weight(_text_:3a in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.27009252 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.41192245 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04858716 = queryNorm
                0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Philosophisch-ethische Rezensionen vom 09.11.2019 (Jürgen Czogalla), Unter: https://philosophisch-ethische-rezensionen.de/rezension/Goedert1.html. In: B.I.T. online 23(2020) H.3, S.345-347 (W. Sühl-Strohmenger) [Unter: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.b-i-t-online.de%2Fheft%2F2020-03-rezensionen.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0iY3f_zNcvEjeZ6inHVnOK]. In: Open Password Nr. 805 vom 14.08.2020 (H.-C. Hobohm) [Unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzE0MywiOGI3NjZkZmNkZjQ1IiwwLDAsMTMxLDFd].
  13. Brown, D.J.: Repositories and journals: are they in conflict? : a literature review of relevant literature (2010) 0.03
    0.030303644 = product of:
      0.060607288 = sum of:
        0.060607288 = product of:
          0.121214576 = sum of:
            0.121214576 = weight(_text_:d.j in 3954) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.121214576 = score(doc=3954,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.32651314 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04858716 = queryNorm
                0.3712395 = fieldWeight in 3954, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3954)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  14. Osman, D.J.; Yearwood, J.; Vamplew, P.: Automated opinion detection : implications of the level of agreement between human raters (2010) 0.03
    0.030303644 = product of:
      0.060607288 = sum of:
        0.060607288 = product of:
          0.121214576 = sum of:
            0.121214576 = weight(_text_:d.j in 4232) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.121214576 = score(doc=4232,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.32651314 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04858716 = queryNorm
                0.3712395 = fieldWeight in 4232, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4232)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  15. Solomon, D.J.; Björk, B.-C.: Publication fees in open access publishing : sources of funding and factors influencing choice of journal (2012) 0.03
    0.030303644 = product of:
      0.060607288 = sum of:
        0.060607288 = product of:
          0.121214576 = sum of:
            0.121214576 = weight(_text_:d.j in 754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.121214576 = score(doc=754,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.32651314 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04858716 = queryNorm
                0.3712395 = fieldWeight in 754, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=754)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  16. Saab, D.J.; Fonseca, F.: Ontological complexity and human culture (2014) 0.03
    0.030303644 = product of:
      0.060607288 = sum of:
        0.060607288 = product of:
          0.121214576 = sum of:
            0.121214576 = weight(_text_:d.j in 3405) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.121214576 = score(doc=3405,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.32651314 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04858716 = queryNorm
                0.3712395 = fieldWeight in 3405, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3405)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  17. Stvilia, B.; Wu, S.; Lee, D.J.: Researchers' uses of and disincentives for sharing their research identity information in research information management systems (2018) 0.03
    0.030303644 = product of:
      0.060607288 = sum of:
        0.060607288 = product of:
          0.121214576 = sum of:
            0.121214576 = weight(_text_:d.j in 4373) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.121214576 = score(doc=4373,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.32651314 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04858716 = queryNorm
                0.3712395 = fieldWeight in 4373, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4373)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  18. Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019) 0.03
    0.028938482 = product of:
      0.057876963 = sum of:
        0.057876963 = product of:
          0.23150785 = sum of:
            0.23150785 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.23150785 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.41192245 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04858716 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
  19. Suchenwirth, L.: Sacherschliessung in Zeiten von Corona : neue Herausforderungen und Chancen (2019) 0.03
    0.028938482 = product of:
      0.057876963 = sum of:
        0.057876963 = product of:
          0.23150785 = sum of:
            0.23150785 = weight(_text_:3a in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.23150785 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.41192245 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04858716 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    https%3A%2F%2Fjournals.univie.ac.at%2Findex.php%2Fvoebm%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F5332%2F5271%2F&usg=AOvVaw2yQdFGHlmOwVls7ANCpTii.
  20. (2013 ff.) 0.03
    0.026331557 = product of:
      0.052663114 = sum of:
        0.052663114 = product of:
          0.10532623 = sum of:
            0.10532623 = weight(_text_:22 in 2851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10532623 = score(doc=2851,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17014395 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04858716 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2851, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2851)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22

Languages

  • e 499
  • d 178
  • a 1
  • hu 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 598
  • el 59
  • m 45
  • s 15
  • x 12
  • r 7
  • b 5
  • i 1
  • z 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications