-
Moreiro-González, J.A.; Ortiz-Repiso, V.: What is happening about KOS in Spain : scientific production analysis, 2000-2017 (2018)
0.06
0.060186144 = product of:
0.18055843 = sum of:
0.18055843 = sum of:
0.13367532 = weight(_text_:j.a in 4869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13367532 = score(doc=4869,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25576657 = queryWeight, product of:
5.913062 = idf(docFreq=324, maxDocs=44218)
0.043254506 = queryNorm
0.5226458 = fieldWeight in 4869, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.913062 = idf(docFreq=324, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4869)
0.04688311 = weight(_text_:22 in 4869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04688311 = score(doc=4869,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15146992 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043254506 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4869, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4869)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 19. 1.2019 14:22:24
-
Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011)
0.05
0.045799747 = product of:
0.13739924 = sum of:
0.13739924 = product of:
0.4121977 = sum of:
0.4121977 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.4121977 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
0.36671218 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.043254506 = queryNorm
1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Content
- Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
-
Milani, S.O.; Chaves Guimarães, J.A.; Olson, H.A.: Bias in subject representation : convergences and divergences in the international literature (2014)
0.05
0.045139607 = product of:
0.13541882 = sum of:
0.13541882 = sum of:
0.10025649 = weight(_text_:j.a in 1443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10025649 = score(doc=1443,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25576657 = queryWeight, product of:
5.913062 = idf(docFreq=324, maxDocs=44218)
0.043254506 = queryNorm
0.39198434 = fieldWeight in 1443, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.913062 = idf(docFreq=324, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1443)
0.03516233 = weight(_text_:22 in 1443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03516233 = score(doc=1443,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15146992 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043254506 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1443, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1443)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
Martínez-Ávila, D.; Chaves Guimarães, J.A.; Pinho, F.A.; Fox, M.J.: ¬The representation of ethics and knowledge organization in the WoS and LISTA databases (2015)
0.05
0.045139607 = product of:
0.13541882 = sum of:
0.13541882 = sum of:
0.10025649 = weight(_text_:j.a in 2358) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10025649 = score(doc=2358,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25576657 = queryWeight, product of:
5.913062 = idf(docFreq=324, maxDocs=44218)
0.043254506 = queryNorm
0.39198434 = fieldWeight in 2358, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.913062 = idf(docFreq=324, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2358)
0.03516233 = weight(_text_:22 in 2358) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03516233 = score(doc=2358,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15146992 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043254506 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2358, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2358)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 17. 2.2018 16:50:22
-
Castle, C.: Getting the central RDM message across : a case study of central versus discipline-specific Research Data Services (RDS) at the University of Cambridge (2019)
0.04
0.043680396 = product of:
0.06552059 = sum of:
0.05086962 = product of:
0.15260886 = sum of:
0.15260886 = weight(_text_:author's in 5491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15260886 = score(doc=5491,freq=4.0), product of:
0.29067692 = queryWeight, product of:
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.043254506 = queryNorm
0.52501196 = fieldWeight in 5491, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5491)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.014650972 = product of:
0.029301943 = sum of:
0.029301943 = weight(_text_:22 in 5491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029301943 = score(doc=5491,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15146992 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043254506 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5491, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5491)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- RDS are usually cross-disciplinary, centralised services, which are increasingly provided at a university by the academic library and in collaboration with other RDM stakeholders, such as the Research Office. At research-intensive universities, research data is generated in a wide range of disciplines and sub-disciplines. This paper will discuss how providing discipline-specific RDM support is approached by such universities and academic libraries, and the advantages and disadvantages of these central and discipline-specific approaches. A descriptive case study on the author's experiences of collaborating with a central RDS at the University of Cambridge, as a subject librarian embedded in an academic department, is a major component of this paper. The case study describes how centralised RDM services offered by the Office of Scholarly Communication (OSC) have been adapted to meet discipline-specific needs in the Department of Chemistry. It will introduce the department and the OSC, and describe the author's role in delivering RDM training, as well as the Data Champions programme, and their membership of the RDM Project Group. It will describe the outcomes of this collaboration for the Department of Chemistry, and for the centralised service. Centralised and discipline-specific approaches to RDS provision have their own advantages and disadvantages. Supporting the discipline-specific RDM needs of researchers is proving particularly challenging for universities to address sustainably: it requires adequate financial resources and staff skilled (or re-skilled) in RDM. A mixed approach is the most desirable, cost-effective way of providing RDS, but this still has constraints.
- Date
- 7. 9.2019 21:30:22
-
Crespo, J.A.; Herranz, N.; Li, Y.; Ruiz-Castillo, J.: ¬The effect on citation inequality of differences in citation practices at the web of science subject category level (2014)
0.04
0.041662093 = product of:
0.124986276 = sum of:
0.124986276 = sum of:
0.08354707 = weight(_text_:j.a in 1291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08354707 = score(doc=1291,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25576657 = queryWeight, product of:
5.913062 = idf(docFreq=324, maxDocs=44218)
0.043254506 = queryNorm
0.3266536 = fieldWeight in 1291, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.913062 = idf(docFreq=324, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1291)
0.041439205 = weight(_text_:22 in 1291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041439205 = score(doc=1291,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15146992 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043254506 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 1291, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1291)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- This article studies the impact of differences in citation practices at the subfield, or Web of Science subject category level, using the model introduced in Crespo, Li, and Ruiz-Castillo (2013a), according to which the number of citations received by an article depends on its underlying scientific influence and the field to which it belongs. We use the same Thomson Reuters data set of about 4.4 million articles used in Crespo et al. (2013a) to analyze 22 broad fields. The main results are the following: First, when the classification system goes from 22 fields to 219 subfields the effect on citation inequality of differences in citation practices increases from ?14% at the field level to 18% at the subfield level. Second, we estimate a set of exchange rates (ERs) over a wide [660, 978] citation quantile interval to express the citation counts of articles into the equivalent counts in the all-sciences case. In the fractional case, for example, we find that in 187 of 219 subfields the ERs are reliable in the sense that the coefficient of variation is smaller than or equal to 0.10. Third, in the fractional case the normalization of the raw data using the ERs (or subfield mean citations) as normalization factors reduces the importance of the differences in citation practices from 18% to 3.8% (3.4%) of overall citation inequality. Fourth, the results in the fractional case are essentially replicated when we adopt a multiplicative approach.
-
Zhang, Y.: Developing a holistic model for digital library evaluation (2010)
0.04
0.040496983 = product of:
0.060745474 = sum of:
0.04316431 = product of:
0.12949292 = sum of:
0.12949292 = weight(_text_:author's in 2360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12949292 = score(doc=2360,freq=2.0), product of:
0.29067692 = queryWeight, product of:
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.043254506 = queryNorm
0.44548744 = fieldWeight in 2360, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2360)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.017581165 = product of:
0.03516233 = sum of:
0.03516233 = weight(_text_:22 in 2360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03516233 = score(doc=2360,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15146992 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043254506 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2360, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2360)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This article reports the author's recent research in developing a holistic model for various levels of digital library (DL) evaluation in which perceived important criteria from heterogeneous stakeholder groups are organized and presented. To develop such a model, the author applied a three-stage research approach: exploration, confirmation, and verification. During the exploration stage, a literature review was conducted followed by an interview, along with a card sorting technique, to collect important criteria perceived by DL experts. Then the criteria identified were used for developing an online survey during the confirmation stage. Survey respondents (431 in total) from 22 countries rated the importance of the criteria. A holistic DL evaluation model was constructed using statistical techniques. Eventually, the verification stage was devised to test the reliability of the model in the context of searching and evaluating an operational DL. The proposed model fills two lacunae in the DL domain: (a) the lack of a comprehensive and flexible framework to guide and benchmark evaluations, and (b) the uncertainty about what divergence exists among heterogeneous DL stakeholders, including general users.
-
Hjoerland, B.: ¬The importance of theories of knowledge : indexing and information retrieval as an example (2011)
0.04
0.040496983 = product of:
0.060745474 = sum of:
0.04316431 = product of:
0.12949292 = sum of:
0.12949292 = weight(_text_:author's in 4359) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12949292 = score(doc=4359,freq=2.0), product of:
0.29067692 = queryWeight, product of:
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.043254506 = queryNorm
0.44548744 = fieldWeight in 4359, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4359)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.017581165 = product of:
0.03516233 = sum of:
0.03516233 = weight(_text_:22 in 4359) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03516233 = score(doc=4359,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15146992 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043254506 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4359, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4359)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- A recent study in information science (IS), raises important issues concerning the value of human indexing and basic theories of indexing and information retrieval, as well as the use of quantitative and qualitative approaches in IS and the underlying theories of knowledge informing the field. The present article uses L&E as the point of departure for demonstrating in what way more social and interpretative understandings may provide fruitful improvements for research in indexing, knowledge organization, and information retrieval. The artcle is motivated by the observation that philosophical contributions tend to be ignored in IS if they are not directly formed as criticisms or invitations to dialogs. It is part of the author's ongoing publication of articles about philosophical issues in IS and it is intended to be followed by analyzes of other examples of contributions to core issues in IS. Although it is formulated as a criticism of a specific paper, it should be seen as part of a general discussion of the philosophical foundation of IS and as a support to the emerging social paradigm in this field.
- Date
- 17. 3.2011 19:22:55
-
Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014)
0.04
0.03816646 = product of:
0.114499375 = sum of:
0.114499375 = product of:
0.3434981 = sum of:
0.3434981 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.3434981 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
0.36671218 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.043254506 = queryNorm
0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
-
Chaves Guimarães, J.A.; Oliveira, E.T. de; Cabrini Gracio, M.C.: Theoretical referents in Knowledge Organization : a domain analysis of the Knowledge Organization journal (2012)
0.04
0.03761634 = product of:
0.11284901 = sum of:
0.11284901 = sum of:
0.08354707 = weight(_text_:j.a in 823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08354707 = score(doc=823,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25576657 = queryWeight, product of:
5.913062 = idf(docFreq=324, maxDocs=44218)
0.043254506 = queryNorm
0.3266536 = fieldWeight in 823, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.913062 = idf(docFreq=324, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=823)
0.029301943 = weight(_text_:22 in 823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029301943 = score(doc=823,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15146992 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043254506 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 823, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=823)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Aiming at contributing to the epistemological characterization of the area of knowledge organization, our goal is to analyze the KO journal, since its creation in 1993, as a knowledge domain, from a nuclear community of the most productive and greater impact authors, analyzing the dialogue among citing authors and cited ones, and also the co-citations established by the citing authors. We worked with a corpus of 310 articles published between 1993 and 2011 produced by a total of 360 authors. The relatively more productive authors, a group geographically concentrated in Europe (37%), North America (44%) and Asia (19%), is clearly explained by the historical European origin of the ISKO and by an increasing North American presence along the years. Of the 33 most cited authors, 22 were co-cited in at least 6 works, which suggests that they are the theoretical referential nucleus of the area, in the studied journal. Finally, we observe that the area reveals theme cohesion and coherence in its production, enabling us to clearly visualize its theoretical referential nucleus and to confirm the role performed by the KO magazine as a catalyzing agent of international theoretical construction in the area.
-
Chaves Guimarães, J.A.; Sales, R. de; Martínez-Ávila, D.; Alencar, M.F.: ¬The conceptual dimension of knowledge organization in the ISKO proceedings domain : a Bardinian content analysis (2014)
0.04
0.03761634 = product of:
0.11284901 = sum of:
0.11284901 = sum of:
0.08354707 = weight(_text_:j.a in 1410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08354707 = score(doc=1410,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25576657 = queryWeight, product of:
5.913062 = idf(docFreq=324, maxDocs=44218)
0.043254506 = queryNorm
0.3266536 = fieldWeight in 1410, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.913062 = idf(docFreq=324, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1410)
0.029301943 = weight(_text_:22 in 1410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029301943 = score(doc=1410,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15146992 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043254506 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1410, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1410)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
Alahmari, F.; Thom, J.A.; Magee, L.: ¬A model for ranking entity attributes using DBpedia (2014)
0.04
0.03761634 = product of:
0.11284901 = sum of:
0.11284901 = sum of:
0.08354707 = weight(_text_:j.a in 1623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08354707 = score(doc=1623,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25576657 = queryWeight, product of:
5.913062 = idf(docFreq=324, maxDocs=44218)
0.043254506 = queryNorm
0.3266536 = fieldWeight in 1623, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.913062 = idf(docFreq=324, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1623)
0.029301943 = weight(_text_:22 in 1623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029301943 = score(doc=1623,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15146992 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043254506 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1623, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1623)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
-
Conde, A.; Larrañaga, M.; Arruarte, A.; Elorriaga, J.A.; Roth, D.: litewi: a combined term extraction and entity linking method for eliciting educational ontologies from textbooks (2016)
0.04
0.03761634 = product of:
0.11284901 = sum of:
0.11284901 = sum of:
0.08354707 = weight(_text_:j.a in 2645) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08354707 = score(doc=2645,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25576657 = queryWeight, product of:
5.913062 = idf(docFreq=324, maxDocs=44218)
0.043254506 = queryNorm
0.3266536 = fieldWeight in 2645, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.913062 = idf(docFreq=324, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2645)
0.029301943 = weight(_text_:22 in 2645) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029301943 = score(doc=2645,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15146992 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043254506 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2645, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2645)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 1.2016 12:38:14
-
Teixeira da Silva, J.A.; Dobránszki, J.: Do open access data files represent an academic Risk? (2015)
0.03
0.03341883 = product of:
0.10025649 = sum of:
0.10025649 = product of:
0.20051298 = sum of:
0.20051298 = weight(_text_:j.a in 2253) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20051298 = score(doc=2253,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25576657 = queryWeight, product of:
5.913062 = idf(docFreq=324, maxDocs=44218)
0.043254506 = queryNorm
0.7839687 = fieldWeight in 2253, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.913062 = idf(docFreq=324, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2253)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
Teixeira da Silva, J.A.: ¬The Importance of the Anonymous Voice in Postpublication Peer Review (2016)
0.03
0.03341883 = product of:
0.10025649 = sum of:
0.10025649 = product of:
0.20051298 = sum of:
0.20051298 = weight(_text_:j.a in 2498) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20051298 = score(doc=2498,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25576657 = queryWeight, product of:
5.913062 = idf(docFreq=324, maxDocs=44218)
0.043254506 = queryNorm
0.7839687 = fieldWeight in 2498, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.913062 = idf(docFreq=324, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2498)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
Gödert, W.; Lepsky, K.: Informationelle Kompetenz : ein humanistischer Entwurf (2019)
0.03
0.026716521 = product of:
0.08014956 = sum of:
0.08014956 = product of:
0.24044868 = sum of:
0.24044868 = weight(_text_:3a in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.24044868 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
0.36671218 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.043254506 = queryNorm
0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Philosophisch-ethische Rezensionen vom 09.11.2019 (Jürgen Czogalla), Unter: https://philosophisch-ethische-rezensionen.de/rezension/Goedert1.html. In: B.I.T. online 23(2020) H.3, S.345-347 (W. Sühl-Strohmenger) [Unter: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.b-i-t-online.de%2Fheft%2F2020-03-rezensionen.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0iY3f_zNcvEjeZ6inHVnOK]. In: Open Password Nr. 805 vom 14.08.2020 (H.-C. Hobohm) [Unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzE0MywiOGI3NjZkZmNkZjQ1IiwwLDAsMTMxLDFd].
-
Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019)
0.02
0.022899874 = product of:
0.06869962 = sum of:
0.06869962 = product of:
0.20609885 = sum of:
0.20609885 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20609885 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
0.36671218 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.043254506 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Content
- Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
-
Suchenwirth, L.: Sacherschliessung in Zeiten von Corona : neue Herausforderungen und Chancen (2019)
0.02
0.022899874 = product of:
0.06869962 = sum of:
0.06869962 = product of:
0.20609885 = sum of:
0.20609885 = weight(_text_:3a in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20609885 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
0.36671218 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.043254506 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Footnote
- https%3A%2F%2Fjournals.univie.ac.at%2Findex.php%2Fvoebm%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F5332%2F5271%2F&usg=AOvVaw2yQdFGHlmOwVls7ANCpTii.
-
Chaves Guimarães, J.A.; Tennis, J.T.: Constant pioneers : the citation frontiers of indexing theory in the ISKO international proceedings (2012)
0.02
0.022279222 = product of:
0.06683766 = sum of:
0.06683766 = product of:
0.13367532 = sum of:
0.13367532 = weight(_text_:j.a in 818) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13367532 = score(doc=818,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25576657 = queryWeight, product of:
5.913062 = idf(docFreq=324, maxDocs=44218)
0.043254506 = queryNorm
0.5226458 = fieldWeight in 818, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.913062 = idf(docFreq=324, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=818)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
Martínez-Ávila, D.; Victorino Evangelista, I.; Simões, M. da Graça; Chaves Guimarães, J.A.: Epistemic communities, domain analysis, and Kuhn : dialogs and intersections in knowledge organization (2018)
0.02
0.022279222 = product of:
0.06683766 = sum of:
0.06683766 = product of:
0.13367532 = sum of:
0.13367532 = weight(_text_:j.a in 4753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13367532 = score(doc=4753,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25576657 = queryWeight, product of:
5.913062 = idf(docFreq=324, maxDocs=44218)
0.043254506 = queryNorm
0.5226458 = fieldWeight in 4753, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.913062 = idf(docFreq=324, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4753)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
