-
Zhang, Y.: Developing a holistic model for digital library evaluation (2010)
0.12
0.12104452 = sum of:
0.03785037 = product of:
0.15140148 = sum of:
0.15140148 = weight(_text_:author's in 2360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15140148 = score(doc=2360,freq=2.0), product of:
0.33985576 = queryWeight, product of:
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.05057262 = queryNorm
0.44548744 = fieldWeight in 2360, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2360)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.08319415 = sum of:
0.042082805 = weight(_text_:b in 2360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042082805 = score(doc=2360,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17917687 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.05057262 = queryNorm
0.23486741 = fieldWeight in 2360, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2360)
0.04111135 = weight(_text_:22 in 2360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04111135 = score(doc=2360,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1770967 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05057262 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2360, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2360)
- Abstract
- This article reports the author's recent research in developing a holistic model for various levels of digital library (DL) evaluation in which perceived important criteria from heterogeneous stakeholder groups are organized and presented. To develop such a model, the author applied a three-stage research approach: exploration, confirmation, and verification. During the exploration stage, a literature review was conducted followed by an interview, along with a card sorting technique, to collect important criteria perceived by DL experts. Then the criteria identified were used for developing an online survey during the confirmation stage. Survey respondents (431 in total) from 22 countries rated the importance of the criteria. A holistic DL evaluation model was constructed using statistical techniques. Eventually, the verification stage was devised to test the reliability of the model in the context of searching and evaluating an operational DL. The proposed model fills two lacunae in the DL domain: (a) the lack of a comprehensive and flexible framework to guide and benchmark evaluations, and (b) the uncertainty about what divergence exists among heterogeneous DL stakeholders, including general users.
-
Hjoerland, B.: ¬The importance of theories of knowledge : indexing and information retrieval as an example (2011)
0.12
0.12104452 = sum of:
0.03785037 = product of:
0.15140148 = sum of:
0.15140148 = weight(_text_:author's in 4359) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15140148 = score(doc=4359,freq=2.0), product of:
0.33985576 = queryWeight, product of:
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.05057262 = queryNorm
0.44548744 = fieldWeight in 4359, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4359)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.08319415 = sum of:
0.042082805 = weight(_text_:b in 4359) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042082805 = score(doc=4359,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17917687 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.05057262 = queryNorm
0.23486741 = fieldWeight in 4359, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4359)
0.04111135 = weight(_text_:22 in 4359) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04111135 = score(doc=4359,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1770967 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05057262 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4359, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4359)
- Abstract
- A recent study in information science (IS), raises important issues concerning the value of human indexing and basic theories of indexing and information retrieval, as well as the use of quantitative and qualitative approaches in IS and the underlying theories of knowledge informing the field. The present article uses L&E as the point of departure for demonstrating in what way more social and interpretative understandings may provide fruitful improvements for research in indexing, knowledge organization, and information retrieval. The artcle is motivated by the observation that philosophical contributions tend to be ignored in IS if they are not directly formed as criticisms or invitations to dialogs. It is part of the author's ongoing publication of articles about philosophical issues in IS and it is intended to be followed by analyzes of other examples of contributions to core issues in IS. Although it is formulated as a criticism of a specific paper, it should be seen as part of a general discussion of the philosophical foundation of IS and as a support to the emerging social paradigm in this field.
- Date
- 17. 3.2011 19:22:55
-
Hafner, R.; Schelling, B.: Automatisierung der Sacherschließung mit Semantic Web Technologie (2015)
0.10
0.097059846 = product of:
0.19411969 = sum of:
0.19411969 = sum of:
0.09819321 = weight(_text_:b in 8365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09819321 = score(doc=8365,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17917687 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.05057262 = queryNorm
0.54802394 = fieldWeight in 8365, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8365)
0.095926486 = weight(_text_:22 in 8365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.095926486 = score(doc=8365,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1770967 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05057262 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 8365, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8365)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 6.2015 16:08:38
-
Cronin, B.: Thinking about data (2013)
0.10
0.097059846 = product of:
0.19411969 = sum of:
0.19411969 = sum of:
0.09819321 = weight(_text_:b in 4347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09819321 = score(doc=4347,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17917687 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.05057262 = queryNorm
0.54802394 = fieldWeight in 4347, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4347)
0.095926486 = weight(_text_:22 in 4347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.095926486 = score(doc=4347,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1770967 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05057262 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4347, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4347)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 3.2013 16:18:36
-
Cronin, B.: ¬The writing on the wall (2015)
0.08
0.08319415 = product of:
0.1663883 = sum of:
0.1663883 = sum of:
0.08416561 = weight(_text_:b in 7297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08416561 = score(doc=7297,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17917687 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.05057262 = queryNorm
0.46973482 = fieldWeight in 7297, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7297)
0.0822227 = weight(_text_:22 in 7297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0822227 = score(doc=7297,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1770967 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05057262 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 7297, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7297)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 26. 4.2015 19:27:22
-
Burghardt, M.; Hertlein, F.; Hinterleitner, B.; Lehenmeier, C.; Spröd, T.: ¬A crowdsourced approach for the documentation and transcription of graffiti in public restrooms (2015)
0.07
0.06932847 = product of:
0.13865694 = sum of:
0.13865694 = sum of:
0.070138015 = weight(_text_:b in 2991) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.070138015 = score(doc=2991,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17917687 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.05057262 = queryNorm
0.3914457 = fieldWeight in 2991, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2991)
0.06851892 = weight(_text_:22 in 2991) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06851892 = score(doc=2991,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1770967 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05057262 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2991, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2991)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 6. 6.2016 18:42:22
-
Castle, C.: Getting the central RDM message across : a case study of central versus discipline-specific Research Data Services (RDS) at the University of Cambridge (2019)
0.06
0.061736815 = sum of:
0.044607084 = product of:
0.17842834 = sum of:
0.17842834 = weight(_text_:author's in 5491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17842834 = score(doc=5491,freq=4.0), product of:
0.33985576 = queryWeight, product of:
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.05057262 = queryNorm
0.52501196 = fieldWeight in 5491, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5491)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.01712973 = product of:
0.03425946 = sum of:
0.03425946 = weight(_text_:22 in 5491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03425946 = score(doc=5491,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1770967 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05057262 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5491, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5491)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- RDS are usually cross-disciplinary, centralised services, which are increasingly provided at a university by the academic library and in collaboration with other RDM stakeholders, such as the Research Office. At research-intensive universities, research data is generated in a wide range of disciplines and sub-disciplines. This paper will discuss how providing discipline-specific RDM support is approached by such universities and academic libraries, and the advantages and disadvantages of these central and discipline-specific approaches. A descriptive case study on the author's experiences of collaborating with a central RDS at the University of Cambridge, as a subject librarian embedded in an academic department, is a major component of this paper. The case study describes how centralised RDM services offered by the Office of Scholarly Communication (OSC) have been adapted to meet discipline-specific needs in the Department of Chemistry. It will introduce the department and the OSC, and describe the author's role in delivering RDM training, as well as the Data Champions programme, and their membership of the RDM Project Group. It will describe the outcomes of this collaboration for the Department of Chemistry, and for the centralised service. Centralised and discipline-specific approaches to RDS provision have their own advantages and disadvantages. Supporting the discipline-specific RDM needs of researchers is proving particularly challenging for universities to address sustainably: it requires adequate financial resources and staff skilled (or re-skilled) in RDM. A mixed approach is the most desirable, cost-effective way of providing RDS, but this still has constraints.
- Date
- 7. 9.2019 21:30:22
-
Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011)
0.06
0.060242042 = product of:
0.120484084 = sum of:
0.120484084 = product of:
0.48193634 = sum of:
0.48193634 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.48193634 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
0.42875522 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.05057262 = queryNorm
1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
-
Li, J.; Shi, D.: Sleeping beauties in genius work : when were they awakened? (2016)
0.06
0.05700046 = product of:
0.11400092 = sum of:
0.11400092 = sum of:
0.07288957 = weight(_text_:b in 2647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07288957 = score(doc=2647,freq=6.0), product of:
0.17917687 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.05057262 = queryNorm
0.40680233 = fieldWeight in 2647, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2647)
0.04111135 = weight(_text_:22 in 2647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04111135 = score(doc=2647,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1770967 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05057262 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2647, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2647)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- "Genius work," proposed by Avramescu, refers to scientific articles whose citations grow exponentially in an extended period, for example, over 50 years. Such articles were defined as "sleeping beauties" by van Raan, who quantitatively studied the phenomenon of delayed recognition. However, the criteria adopted by van Raan at times are not applicable and may confer recognition prematurely. To revise such deficiencies, this paper proposes two new criteria, which are applicable (but not limited) to exponential citation curves. We searched for genius work among articles of Nobel Prize laureates during the period of 1901-2012 on the Web of Science, finding 25 articles of genius work out of 21,438 papers including 10 (by van Raan's criteria) sleeping beauties and 15 nonsleeping-beauties. By our new criteria, two findings were obtained through empirical analysis: (a) the awakening periods for genius work depend on the increase rate b in the exponential function, and (b) lower b leads to a longer sleeping period.
- Date
- 22. 1.2016 14:13:32
-
Scholarly metrics under the microscope : from citation analysis to academic auditing (2015)
0.06
0.05546277 = product of:
0.11092554 = sum of:
0.11092554 = sum of:
0.05611041 = weight(_text_:b in 4654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05611041 = score(doc=4654,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17917687 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.05057262 = queryNorm
0.31315655 = fieldWeight in 4654, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4654)
0.054815132 = weight(_text_:22 in 4654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054815132 = score(doc=4654,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1770967 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05057262 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4654, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4654)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2017 17:12:50
- Editor
- Cronin, B. u. C.R. Sugimoto
-
Kattenbeck, M.; Müller, M.; Ohm, C.; Ludwig, B.: ¬Der Weg ist das Ziel : Fußgängernavigation ist Forschung zu Information Behavior (2015)
0.06
0.05546277 = product of:
0.11092554 = sum of:
0.11092554 = sum of:
0.05611041 = weight(_text_:b in 1742) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05611041 = score(doc=1742,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17917687 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.05057262 = queryNorm
0.31315655 = fieldWeight in 1742, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1742)
0.054815132 = weight(_text_:22 in 1742) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054815132 = score(doc=1742,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1770967 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05057262 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1742, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1742)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 21. 3.2015 18:13:22
-
Lorenz, B.: Zur Theorie und Terminologie der bibliothekarischen Klassifikation (2018)
0.06
0.05546277 = product of:
0.11092554 = sum of:
0.11092554 = sum of:
0.05611041 = weight(_text_:b in 4339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05611041 = score(doc=4339,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17917687 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.05057262 = queryNorm
0.31315655 = fieldWeight in 4339, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4339)
0.054815132 = weight(_text_:22 in 4339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054815132 = score(doc=4339,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1770967 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05057262 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4339, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4339)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Pages
- S.1-22
-
Berti, Jr., D.W.; Lima, G.; Maculan, B.; Soergel, D.: Computer-assisted checking of conceptual relationships in a large thesaurus (2018)
0.06
0.05546277 = product of:
0.11092554 = sum of:
0.11092554 = sum of:
0.05611041 = weight(_text_:b in 4721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05611041 = score(doc=4721,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17917687 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.05057262 = queryNorm
0.31315655 = fieldWeight in 4721, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4721)
0.054815132 = weight(_text_:22 in 4721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054815132 = score(doc=4721,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1770967 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05057262 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4721, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4721)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 17. 1.2019 19:04:22
-
Stella, K.: Brigitte Reimann : kommentierte Bibliografie und Werkverzeichnis (2014)
0.05
0.050312713 = product of:
0.100625426 = sum of:
0.100625426 = sum of:
0.05951408 = weight(_text_:b in 1488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05951408 = score(doc=1488,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17917687 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.05057262 = queryNorm
0.3321527 = fieldWeight in 1488, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1488)
0.04111135 = weight(_text_:22 in 1488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04111135 = score(doc=1488,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1770967 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05057262 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1488, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1488)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Im Aisthesis Verlag ist der erste Teil der Bibliografie Brigitte Reimann von Kristina Stella erschienen. Die Bibliografie ist das Ergebnis der jahrelangen Recherchen Stellas in Bibliotheken und Archiven. Das umfangreiche Nachschlagewerk ermöglicht erstmalig einen vollständigen Überblick über das Werk der DDR-Schriftstellerin und dessen Rezeption. Teil A verzeichnet die Primärliteratur und enthält zahlreiche Hintergrundinformationen zu den Werken und deren unterschiedlichen Ausgaben. Der Nachweis der Originalmanuskripte und der umfangreichen Korrespondenz Brigitte Reimanns mit Privatpersonen und Institutionen bietet eine umfassende Übersicht über die in den Archiven vorhandenen Dokumente. Bühnenwerke, Rundfunksendungen, Fernsehsendungen und Veranstaltungen mit Beteiligung von Brigitte Reimann werden in Auswahl nachgewiesen. Teil B dokumentiert die Sekundärliteratur zu den Texten Reimanns sowie die auf die Person Brigitte Reimann bezogenen Publikationen. Der Nachweis der Originaldokumente im Sekundärteil verzeichnet unter anderem die der Forschung zugänglichen Akten des Ministeriums für Staatssicherheit. Bühnenwerke, Rundfunksendungen, Fernsehsendungen und Veranstaltungen über Brigitte Reimann werden in Auswahl nachgewiesen. Teil C bietet mittels zahlreicher Register und Verzeichnisse umfangreiche Sucheinstiege für den Primär- und Sekundärteil. Er enthält zudem die Auflistung von nach Brigitte Reimann benannten Preisen, Wettbewerben, Institutionen und Straßen.
- Series
- Bibliographien zur deutschen Literaturgeschichte ; 22
- Type
- b
-
Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014)
0.05
0.050201703 = product of:
0.100403406 = sum of:
0.100403406 = product of:
0.40161362 = sum of:
0.40161362 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.40161362 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
0.42875522 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.05057262 = queryNorm
0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
-
Mitchell, J.S.; Zeng, M.L.; Zumer, M.: Modeling classification systems in multicultural and multilingual contexts (2012)
0.05
0.050111517 = product of:
0.100223035 = sum of:
0.100223035 = sum of:
0.042082805 = weight(_text_:b in 1967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042082805 = score(doc=1967,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17917687 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.05057262 = queryNorm
0.23486741 = fieldWeight in 1967, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1967)
0.058140233 = weight(_text_:22 in 1967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058140233 = score(doc=1967,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1770967 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05057262 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 1967, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1967)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper reports on the second part of an initiative of the authors on researching classification systems with the conceptual model defined by the Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD) final report. In an earlier study, the authors explored whether the FRSAD conceptual model could be extended beyond subject authority data to model classification data. The focus of the current study is to determine if classification data modeled using FRSAD can be used to solve real-world discovery problems in multicultural and multilingual contexts. The paper discusses the relationships between entities (same type or different types) in the context of classification systems that involve multiple translations and /or multicultural implementations. Results of two case studies are presented in detail: (a) two instances of the DDC (DDC 22 in English, and the Swedish-English mixed translation of DDC 22), and (b) Chinese Library Classification. The use cases of conceptual models in practice are also discussed.
-
Kim, J.: Faculty self-archiving : motivations and barriers (2010)
0.05
0.049076475 = sum of:
0.031541973 = product of:
0.1261679 = sum of:
0.1261679 = weight(_text_:author's in 3989) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1261679 = score(doc=3989,freq=2.0), product of:
0.33985576 = queryWeight, product of:
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.05057262 = queryNorm
0.3712395 = fieldWeight in 3989, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3989)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.017534504 = product of:
0.035069007 = sum of:
0.035069007 = weight(_text_:b in 3989) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035069007 = score(doc=3989,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17917687 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.05057262 = queryNorm
0.19572285 = fieldWeight in 3989, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3989)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This study investigated factors that motivate or impede faculty participation in self-archiving practices-the placement of research work in various open access (OA) venues, ranging from personal Web pages to OA archives. The author's research design involves triangulation of survey and interview data from 17 Carnegie doctorate universities with DSpace institutional repositories. The analysis of survey responses from 684 professors and 41 telephone interviews identified seven significant factors: (a) altruism-the idea of providing OA benefits for users; (b) perceived self-archiving culture; (c) copyright concerns; (d) technical skills; (e) age; (f) perception of no harmful impact of self-archiving on tenure and promotion; and (g) concerns about additional time and effort. The factors are listed in descending order of their effect size. Age, copyright concerns, and additional time and effort are negatively associated with self-archiving, whereas remaining factors are positively related to it. Faculty are motivated by OA advantages to users, disciplinary norms, and no negative influence on academic reward. However, barriers to self-archiving-concerns about copyright, extra time and effort, technical ability, and age-imply that the provision of services to assist faculty with copyright management, and with technical and logistical issues, could encourage higher rates of self-archiving.
-
Chambers, S.; Myall, C.: Cataloging and classification : review of the literature 2007-8 (2010)
0.05
0.048529923 = product of:
0.097059846 = sum of:
0.097059846 = sum of:
0.049096607 = weight(_text_:b in 4309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049096607 = score(doc=4309,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17917687 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.05057262 = queryNorm
0.27401197 = fieldWeight in 4309, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4309)
0.047963243 = weight(_text_:22 in 4309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047963243 = score(doc=4309,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1770967 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05057262 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4309, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4309)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
- Type
- b
-
Szczepanowska, B.: Promotion of knowledge on the international level : the example of occupational safety (2014)
0.05
0.048529923 = product of:
0.097059846 = sum of:
0.097059846 = sum of:
0.049096607 = weight(_text_:b in 1452) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049096607 = score(doc=1452,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17917687 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.05057262 = queryNorm
0.27401197 = fieldWeight in 1452, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1452)
0.047963243 = weight(_text_:22 in 1452) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047963243 = score(doc=1452,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1770967 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05057262 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1452, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1452)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
Drees, B.: Zukunft der Informationsinfrastrukturen : das deutsche Bibliothekswesen im digitalen Zeitalter (2016)
0.05
0.048529923 = product of:
0.097059846 = sum of:
0.097059846 = sum of:
0.049096607 = weight(_text_:b in 3202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049096607 = score(doc=3202,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17917687 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.05057262 = queryNorm
0.27401197 = fieldWeight in 3202, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3202)
0.047963243 = weight(_text_:22 in 3202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047963243 = score(doc=3202,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1770967 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05057262 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3202, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3202)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 6.2016 11:45:20
