Search (692 results, page 1 of 35)

0.089061856 = product of:
  0.17812371 = sum of:
    0.17812371 = sum of:
      0.14557958 = weight(_text_:c.h in 2829) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.14557958 = score(doc=2829,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.35580873 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.406428 = idf(docFreq=72, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04804053 = queryNorm
          0.4091512 = fieldWeight in 2829, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            7.406428 = idf(docFreq=72, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2829)
      0.032544143 = weight(_text_:22 in 2829) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.032544143 = score(doc=2829,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16822976 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04804053 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2829, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2829)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

12. 3.2016 13:17:22

0.06706138 = product of:
  0.13412276 = sum of:
    0.13412276 = sum of:
      0.101905696 = weight(_text_:c.h in 4066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.101905696 = score(doc=4066,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.35580873 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.406428 = idf(docFreq=72, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04804053 = queryNorm
          0.28640583 = fieldWeight in 4066, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            7.406428 = idf(docFreq=72, maxDocs=44218)
            0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4066)
      0.03221706 = weight(_text_:22 in 4066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03221706 = score(doc=4066,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.16822976 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04804053 = queryNorm
          0.19150631 = fieldWeight in 4066, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4066)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Kommentare: "Keine leichte Lektüre, doch wer auf den Horizont blickt, kann diesen auch erweitern." (Thorsten Schäfer-Gümbel, vorwärts.de, Lesetipp von SPD Spitzenpolitikern, 15. August 2017) "Das beste Buch dieses Frühjahrs." (Thorsten Giersch, Carina Kontio, Handelsblatt online, 29. Juni 2017) "Ein Sachbuch, so anregend, dass man dazu tanzen möchte!" (Denis Scheck, ARD Druckfrisch, 2. Juli 2017) "A thoughtful look of what may be in store for humanity (...). It is a deeply engaging book with lots of stimulating ideas (...). It makes you think about the future, which is another way of saying it makes you think about the present." (Bill Gates, via Facebook, 4. Juni 2017) "Yuval Noah Harari's insights are compelling." (Paul Collier, TLS, 25. November 2016 ) "Challenging, readable and thought-provoking." (Bill Gates, Gates Notes, Bill Gates' Sommer-Buchtipps, 22. Mai 2017) "Man sollte alle Geschichtslehrer von Harari coachen lassen." (Christian Jostmann, Die Furche, 20. April 2017) "Vielleicht brauchen wir ja düstere Szenarien, wie Hararis Buch 'Homo Deus', um den Mut für neue Utopien zu finden." (Sven Waskönig, ARD ttt, 30. April 2017)
"In einer verblüffenden Tour d'Horizon durch die Menschheitsgeschichte beschreibt Harari, wie der Mensch in einem Akt wachsender Selbstermächtigung zum Homo Deus avanciert." (Adrian Lobe, Zeit Online, 10. April 2017) "(Harari) hat ein anmaßendes Buch geschrieben. Und ein aufregendes." (Erik Raidt, Stuttgarter Nachrichten Online, 31. März 2017) "Intelligent, scharfsinnig und manchmal sogar überraschend witzig (...) eröffnet einen ganz anderen Blick auf Geschichte." (Klaus Bittermann, taz literataz, 22. März 2017) "Überraschend, informativ, abwechslungsreich und leicht zu lesen." (Hildegard Lorenz, Münchner Merkur, 21. März 2017) "Sehen, wie die Welt ist, ohne auf die Bremse zu treten. Das ist der Sound von Yuval Noah Hararis 'Homo Deus'." (Adolf Holl, Die Presse, 18. März 2017) "Hararis packendes Buch ist ein Bekenntnis zum Humanismus." (Thomas Vasek, P.M., 10. März 2017) "Überaus anregende und fesselnde Lektüre." (Wolfgang Schneider, SWR2, 19. Februar 2017) "Fulminant, klug und düster." (Deutschlandradio Kultur, März 2017)

Imprint

München : C.H. Beck

0.05864575 = sum of:
  0.04237368 = product of:
    0.16949472 = sum of:
      0.16949472 = weight(_text_:author's in 5491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.16949472 = score(doc=5491,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.32283974 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04804053 = queryNorm
          0.52501196 = fieldWeight in 5491, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5491)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.016272072 = product of:
    0.032544143 = sum of:
      0.032544143 = weight(_text_:22 in 5491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.032544143 = score(doc=5491,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16822976 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04804053 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5491, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5491)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

RDS are usually cross-disciplinary, centralised services, which are increasingly provided at a university by the academic library and in collaboration with other RDM stakeholders, such as the Research Office. At research-intensive universities, research data is generated in a wide range of disciplines and sub-disciplines. This paper will discuss how providing discipline-specific RDM support is approached by such universities and academic libraries, and the advantages and disadvantages of these central and discipline-specific approaches. A descriptive case study on the author's experiences of collaborating with a central RDS at the University of Cambridge, as a subject librarian embedded in an academic department, is a major component of this paper. The case study describes how centralised RDM services offered by the Office of Scholarly Communication (OSC) have been adapted to meet discipline-specific needs in the Department of Chemistry. It will introduce the department and the OSC, and describe the author's role in delivering RDM training, as well as the Data Champions programme, and their membership of the RDM Project Group. It will describe the outcomes of this collaboration for the Department of Chemistry, and for the centralised service. Centralised and discipline-specific approaches to RDS provision have their own advantages and disadvantages. Supporting the discipline-specific RDM needs of researchers is proving particularly challenging for universities to address sustainably: it requires adequate financial resources and staff skilled (or re-skilled) in RDM. A mixed approach is the most desirable, cost-effective way of providing RDS, but this still has constraints.

Date

7. 9.2019 21:30:22

0.05823183 = product of:
  0.11646366 = sum of:
    0.11646366 = product of:
      0.23292732 = sum of:
        0.23292732 = weight(_text_:c.h in 3571) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.23292732 = score(doc=3571,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35580873 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.406428 = idf(docFreq=72, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04804053 = queryNorm
            0.6546419 = fieldWeight in 3571, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.406428 = idf(docFreq=72, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3571)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Bezugnahme auf: Harari, Y.N.: Homo deus: eine Geschichte von Morgen. Aus dem Englischen übersetzt von Andreas Wirthensohn. München: C.H. Beck 2017.

0.05823183 = product of:
  0.11646366 = sum of:
    0.11646366 = product of:
      0.23292732 = sum of:
        0.23292732 = weight(_text_:c.h in 4762) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.23292732 = score(doc=4762,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35580873 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.406428 = idf(docFreq=72, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04804053 = queryNorm
            0.6546419 = fieldWeight in 4762, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.406428 = idf(docFreq=72, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4762)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.05823183 = product of:
  0.11646366 = sum of:
    0.11646366 = product of:
      0.23292732 = sum of:
        0.23292732 = weight(_text_:c.h in 4767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.23292732 = score(doc=4767,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35580873 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.406428 = idf(docFreq=72, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04804053 = queryNorm
            0.6546419 = fieldWeight in 4767, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.406428 = idf(docFreq=72, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4767)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.05823183 = product of:
  0.11646366 = sum of:
    0.11646366 = product of:
      0.23292732 = sum of:
        0.23292732 = weight(_text_:c.h in 4796) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.23292732 = score(doc=4796,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35580873 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.406428 = idf(docFreq=72, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04804053 = queryNorm
            0.6546419 = fieldWeight in 4796, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.406428 = idf(docFreq=72, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4796)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.05823183 = product of:
  0.11646366 = sum of:
    0.11646366 = product of:
      0.23292732 = sum of:
        0.23292732 = weight(_text_:c.h in 4929) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.23292732 = score(doc=4929,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35580873 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.406428 = idf(docFreq=72, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04804053 = queryNorm
            0.6546419 = fieldWeight in 4929, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.406428 = idf(docFreq=72, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4929)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.05823183 = product of:
  0.11646366 = sum of:
    0.11646366 = product of:
      0.23292732 = sum of:
        0.23292732 = weight(_text_:c.h in 4946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.23292732 = score(doc=4946,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35580873 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.406428 = idf(docFreq=72, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04804053 = queryNorm
            0.6546419 = fieldWeight in 4946, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.406428 = idf(docFreq=72, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4946)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.057225823 = product of:
  0.11445165 = sum of:
    0.11445165 = product of:
      0.4578066 = sum of:
        0.4578066 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.4578066 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.40728816 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04804053 = queryNorm
            1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.

0.055481747 = sum of:
  0.03595526 = product of:
    0.14382105 = sum of:
      0.14382105 = weight(_text_:author's in 2360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.14382105 = score(doc=2360,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.32283974 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04804053 = queryNorm
          0.44548744 = fieldWeight in 2360, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2360)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.019526485 = product of:
    0.03905297 = sum of:
      0.03905297 = weight(_text_:22 in 2360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03905297 = score(doc=2360,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16822976 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04804053 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2360, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2360)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This article reports the author's recent research in developing a holistic model for various levels of digital library (DL) evaluation in which perceived important criteria from heterogeneous stakeholder groups are organized and presented. To develop such a model, the author applied a three-stage research approach: exploration, confirmation, and verification. During the exploration stage, a literature review was conducted followed by an interview, along with a card sorting technique, to collect important criteria perceived by DL experts. Then the criteria identified were used for developing an online survey during the confirmation stage. Survey respondents (431 in total) from 22 countries rated the importance of the criteria. A holistic DL evaluation model was constructed using statistical techniques. Eventually, the verification stage was devised to test the reliability of the model in the context of searching and evaluating an operational DL. The proposed model fills two lacunae in the DL domain: (a) the lack of a comprehensive and flexible framework to guide and benchmark evaluations, and (b) the uncertainty about what divergence exists among heterogeneous DL stakeholders, including general users.

0.055481747 = sum of:
  0.03595526 = product of:
    0.14382105 = sum of:
      0.14382105 = weight(_text_:author's in 4359) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.14382105 = score(doc=4359,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.32283974 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04804053 = queryNorm
          0.44548744 = fieldWeight in 4359, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4359)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.019526485 = product of:
    0.03905297 = sum of:
      0.03905297 = weight(_text_:22 in 4359) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03905297 = score(doc=4359,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16822976 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04804053 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4359, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4359)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

A recent study in information science (IS), raises important issues concerning the value of human indexing and basic theories of indexing and information retrieval, as well as the use of quantitative and qualitative approaches in IS and the underlying theories of knowledge informing the field. The present article uses L&E as the point of departure for demonstrating in what way more social and interpretative understandings may provide fruitful improvements for research in indexing, knowledge organization, and information retrieval. The artcle is motivated by the observation that philosophical contributions tend to be ignored in IS if they are not directly formed as criticisms or invitations to dialogs. It is part of the author's ongoing publication of articles about philosophical issues in IS and it is intended to be followed by analyzes of other examples of contributions to core issues in IS. Although it is formulated as a criticism of a specific paper, it should be seen as part of a general discussion of the philosophical foundation of IS and as a support to the emerging social paradigm in this field.

Date

17. 3.2011 19:22:55

0.050952848 = product of:
  0.101905696 = sum of:
    0.101905696 = product of:
      0.20381139 = sum of:
        0.20381139 = weight(_text_:c.h in 3503) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20381139 = score(doc=3503,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35580873 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.406428 = idf(docFreq=72, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04804053 = queryNorm
            0.57281166 = fieldWeight in 3503, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.406428 = idf(docFreq=72, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3503)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.04768819 = product of:
  0.09537638 = sum of:
    0.09537638 = product of:
      0.38150552 = sum of:
        0.38150552 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.38150552 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.40728816 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04804053 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja

0.043673873 = product of:
  0.087347746 = sum of:
    0.087347746 = product of:
      0.17469549 = sum of:
        0.17469549 = weight(_text_:c.h in 779) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17469549 = score(doc=779,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35580873 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.406428 = idf(docFreq=72, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04804053 = queryNorm
            0.49098146 = fieldWeight in 779, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.406428 = idf(docFreq=72, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=779)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.043673873 = product of:
  0.087347746 = sum of:
    0.087347746 = product of:
      0.17469549 = sum of:
        0.17469549 = weight(_text_:c.h in 5468) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17469549 = score(doc=5468,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35580873 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.406428 = idf(docFreq=72, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04804053 = queryNorm
            0.49098146 = fieldWeight in 5468, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.406428 = idf(docFreq=72, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5468)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.036394894 = product of:
  0.07278979 = sum of:
    0.07278979 = product of:
      0.14557958 = sum of:
        0.14557958 = weight(_text_:c.h in 3325) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14557958 = score(doc=3325,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35580873 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.406428 = idf(docFreq=72, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04804053 = queryNorm
            0.4091512 = fieldWeight in 3325, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.406428 = idf(docFreq=72, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3325)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.036394894 = product of:
  0.07278979 = sum of:
    0.07278979 = product of:
      0.14557958 = sum of:
        0.14557958 = weight(_text_:c.h in 4045) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14557958 = score(doc=4045,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35580873 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.406428 = idf(docFreq=72, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04804053 = queryNorm
            0.4091512 = fieldWeight in 4045, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.406428 = idf(docFreq=72, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4045)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Editor

Davis, C.H.

0.036394894 = product of:
  0.07278979 = sum of:
    0.07278979 = product of:
      0.14557958 = sum of:
        0.14557958 = weight(_text_:c.h in 4979) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14557958 = score(doc=4979,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35580873 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.406428 = idf(docFreq=72, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04804053 = queryNorm
            0.4091512 = fieldWeight in 4979, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.406428 = idf(docFreq=72, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4979)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

Rez. in: JASIST 62(2011) no.12, S.2543-2545 (C.H. Davis)

0.036394894 = product of:
  0.07278979 = sum of:
    0.07278979 = product of:
      0.14557958 = sum of:
        0.14557958 = weight(_text_:c.h in 2146) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14557958 = score(doc=2146,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35580873 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.406428 = idf(docFreq=72, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04804053 = queryNorm
            0.4091512 = fieldWeight in 2146, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.406428 = idf(docFreq=72, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2146)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

Vgl. Original unter: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0896627315005243: "Morais Tavares, R., A. Mendelsohn, Y.Grossman, C.H. Williams, M. Shapiro, Y. Trope u. D. Schiller: A Map for Social Navigation in the Human Brain" in. Neuron 87(2015) no.1, S,231-243. [Deciphering the neural mechanisms of social behavior has propelled the growth of social neuroscience. The exact computations of the social brain, however, remain elusive. Here we investigated how the human br ain tracks ongoing changes in social relationships using functional neuroimaging. Participants were lead characters in a role-playing game in which they were to find a new home and a job through interactions with virtual cartoon characters. We found that a two-dimensional geometric model of social relationships, a "social space" framed by power and affiliation, predicted hippocampal activity. Moreover, participants who reported better social skills showed stronger covariance between hippocampal activity and "movement" through "social space." The results suggest that the hippocampus is crucial for social cognition, and imply that beyond framing physical locations, the hippocampus computes a more general, inclusive, abstract, and multidimensional cognitive map consistent with its role in episodic memory.].