Search (5893 results, page 1 of 295)

  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Zhang, Y.: Developing a holistic model for digital library evaluation (2010) 0.08 
    0.08063398 = sum of:
  0.028561423 = product of:
    0.14280711 = sum of:
      0.14280711 = weight(_text_:author's in 2360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.14280711 = score(doc=2360,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.32056373 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047701847 = queryNorm
          0.44548744 = fieldWeight in 2360, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2360)
    0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.052072562 = sum of:
    0.013294912 = weight(_text_:a in 2360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013294912 = score(doc=2360,freq=20.0), product of:
        0.05500247 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047701847 = queryNorm
        0.24171482 = fieldWeight in 2360, product of:
          4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
            20.0 = termFreq=20.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2360)
    0.03877765 = weight(_text_:22 in 2360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03877765 = score(doc=2360,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16704375 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047701847 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2360, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2360)
    Abstract
    This article reports the author's recent research in developing a holistic model for various levels of digital library (DL) evaluation in which perceived important criteria from heterogeneous stakeholder groups are organized and presented. To develop such a model, the author applied a three-stage research approach: exploration, confirmation, and verification. During the exploration stage, a literature review was conducted followed by an interview, along with a card sorting technique, to collect important criteria perceived by DL experts. Then the criteria identified were used for developing an online survey during the confirmation stage. Survey respondents (431 in total) from 22 countries rated the importance of the criteria. A holistic DL evaluation model was constructed using statistical techniques. Eventually, the verification stage was devised to test the reliability of the model in the context of searching and evaluating an operational DL. The proposed model fills two lacunae in the DL domain: (a) the lack of a comprehensive and flexible framework to guide and benchmark evaluations, and (b) the uncertainty about what divergence exists among heterogeneous DL stakeholders, including general users.
    Type
    a
  2. Hjoerland, B.: ¬The importance of theories of knowledge : indexing and information retrieval as an example (2011) 0.08 
    0.07763726 = sum of:
  0.028561423 = product of:
    0.14280711 = sum of:
      0.14280711 = weight(_text_:author's in 4359) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.14280711 = score(doc=4359,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.32056373 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047701847 = queryNorm
          0.44548744 = fieldWeight in 4359, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4359)
    0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.049075842 = sum of:
    0.010298193 = weight(_text_:a in 4359) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010298193 = score(doc=4359,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.05500247 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047701847 = queryNorm
        0.18723148 = fieldWeight in 4359, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4359)
    0.03877765 = weight(_text_:22 in 4359) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03877765 = score(doc=4359,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16704375 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047701847 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4359, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4359)
    Abstract
    A recent study in information science (IS), raises important issues concerning the value of human indexing and basic theories of indexing and information retrieval, as well as the use of quantitative and qualitative approaches in IS and the underlying theories of knowledge informing the field. The present article uses L&E as the point of departure for demonstrating in what way more social and interpretative understandings may provide fruitful improvements for research in indexing, knowledge organization, and information retrieval. The artcle is motivated by the observation that philosophical contributions tend to be ignored in IS if they are not directly formed as criticisms or invitations to dialogs. It is part of the author's ongoing publication of articles about philosophical issues in IS and it is intended to be followed by analyzes of other examples of contributions to core issues in IS. Although it is formulated as a criticism of a specific paper, it should be seen as part of a general discussion of the philosophical foundation of IS and as a support to the emerging social paradigm in this field.
    Date
    17. 3.2011 19:22:55
    Type
    a
  3. Castle, C.: Getting the central RDM message across : a case study of central versus discipline-specific Research Data Services (RDS) at the University of Cambridge (2019) 0.08 
    0.07648522 = sum of:
  0.03365996 = product of:
    0.1682998 = sum of:
      0.1682998 = weight(_text_:author's in 5491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.1682998 = score(doc=5491,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.32056373 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047701847 = queryNorm
          0.52501196 = fieldWeight in 5491, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5491)
    0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.04282526 = sum of:
    0.010510551 = weight(_text_:a in 5491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010510551 = score(doc=5491,freq=18.0), product of:
        0.05500247 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047701847 = queryNorm
        0.19109234 = fieldWeight in 5491, product of:
          4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
            18.0 = termFreq=18.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5491)
    0.03231471 = weight(_text_:22 in 5491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03231471 = score(doc=5491,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16704375 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047701847 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5491, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5491)
    Abstract
    RDS are usually cross-disciplinary, centralised services, which are increasingly provided at a university by the academic library and in collaboration with other RDM stakeholders, such as the Research Office. At research-intensive universities, research data is generated in a wide range of disciplines and sub-disciplines. This paper will discuss how providing discipline-specific RDM support is approached by such universities and academic libraries, and the advantages and disadvantages of these central and discipline-specific approaches. A descriptive case study on the author's experiences of collaborating with a central RDS at the University of Cambridge, as a subject librarian embedded in an academic department, is a major component of this paper. The case study describes how centralised RDM services offered by the Office of Scholarly Communication (OSC) have been adapted to meet discipline-specific needs in the Department of Chemistry. It will introduce the department and the OSC, and describe the author's role in delivering RDM training, as well as the Data Champions programme, and their membership of the RDM Project Group. It will describe the outcomes of this collaboration for the Department of Chemistry, and for the centralised service. Centralised and discipline-specific approaches to RDS provision have their own advantages and disadvantages. Supporting the discipline-specific RDM needs of researchers is proving particularly challenging for universities to address sustainably: it requires adequate financial resources and staff skilled (or re-skilled) in RDM. A mixed approach is the most desirable, cost-effective way of providing RDS, but this still has constraints.
    Date
    7. 9.2019 21:30:22
    Type
    a
  4. Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019) 0.05 
    0.053037174 = sum of:
  0.04545791 = product of:
    0.22728954 = sum of:
      0.22728954 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.22728954 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.4044168 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047701847 = queryNorm
          0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
    0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.007579265 = product of:
    0.01515853 = sum of:
      0.01515853 = weight(_text_:a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.01515853 = score(doc=400,freq=26.0), product of:
          0.05500247 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047701847 = queryNorm
          0.27559727 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
            5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
              26.0 = termFreq=26.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    On a scientific concept hierarchy, a parent concept may have a few attributes, each of which has multiple values being a group of child concepts. We call these attributes facets: classification has a few facets such as application (e.g., face recognition), model (e.g., svm, knn), and metric (e.g., precision). In this work, we aim at building faceted concept hierarchies from scientific literature. Hierarchy construction methods heavily rely on hypernym detection, however, the faceted relations are parent-to-child links but the hypernym relation is a multi-hop, i.e., ancestor-to-descendent link with a specific facet "type-of". We use information extraction techniques to find synonyms, sibling concepts, and ancestor-descendent relations from a data science corpus. And we propose a hierarchy growth algorithm to infer the parent-child links from the three types of relationships. It resolves conflicts by maintaining the acyclic structure of a hierarchy.
    Content
    Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
    Type
    a
  5. Cronin, B.: Thinking about data (2013) 0.05 
    0.050145514 = product of:
  0.10029103 = sum of:
    0.10029103 = sum of:
      0.009809847 = weight(_text_:a in 4347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.009809847 = score(doc=4347,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.05500247 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047701847 = queryNorm
          0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 4347, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4347)
      0.090481184 = weight(_text_:22 in 4347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.090481184 = score(doc=4347,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16704375 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047701847 = queryNorm
          0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4347, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4347)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 3.2013 16:18:36
    Type
    a
  6. Grudin, J.: Human-computer interaction (2011) 0.05 
    0.050145514 = product of:
  0.10029103 = sum of:
    0.10029103 = sum of:
      0.009809847 = weight(_text_:a in 1601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.009809847 = score(doc=1601,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.05500247 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047701847 = queryNorm
          0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 1601, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1601)
      0.090481184 = weight(_text_:22 in 1601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.090481184 = score(doc=1601,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16704375 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047701847 = queryNorm
          0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1601, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1601)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    27.12.2014 18:54:22
    Type
    a
  7. Schöne neue Welt? : Fragen und Antworten: Wie Facebook menschliche Gedanken auslesen will (2017) 0.05 
    0.04920342 = product of:
  0.09840684 = sum of:
    0.09840684 = sum of:
      0.007007033 = weight(_text_:a in 2810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.007007033 = score(doc=2810,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.05500247 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047701847 = queryNorm
          0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 2810, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2810)
      0.091399804 = weight(_text_:22 in 2810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.091399804 = score(doc=2810,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.16704375 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047701847 = queryNorm
          0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 2810, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2810)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 7.2004 9:42:33
    22. 4.2017 11:58:05
    Type
    a
  8. Wolchover, N.: Wie ein Aufsehen erregender Beweis kaum Beachtung fand (2017) 0.05 
    0.04920342 = product of:
  0.09840684 = sum of:
    0.09840684 = sum of:
      0.007007033 = weight(_text_:a in 3582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.007007033 = score(doc=3582,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.05500247 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047701847 = queryNorm
          0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 3582, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3582)
      0.091399804 = weight(_text_:22 in 3582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.091399804 = score(doc=3582,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.16704375 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047701847 = queryNorm
          0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3582, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3582)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 4.2017 10:42:05
    22. 4.2017 10:48:38
    Type
    a
  9. Poscher, R.: ¬Die Zukunft der informationellen Selbstbestimmung als Recht auf Abwehr von Grundrechtsgefährdungen (2012) 0.05 
    0.04920342 = product of:
  0.09840684 = sum of:
    0.09840684 = sum of:
      0.007007033 = weight(_text_:a in 3975) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.007007033 = score(doc=3975,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.05500247 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047701847 = queryNorm
          0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 3975, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3975)
      0.091399804 = weight(_text_:22 in 3975) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.091399804 = score(doc=3975,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.16704375 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047701847 = queryNorm
          0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3975, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3975)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 2.2018 12:06:44
    22. 2.2018 12:13:53
    Type
    a
  10. Suchenwirth, L.: Sacherschliessung in Zeiten von Corona : neue Herausforderungen und Chancen (2019) 0.05 
    0.048430745 = sum of:
  0.04545791 = product of:
    0.22728954 = sum of:
      0.22728954 = weight(_text_:3a in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.22728954 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.4044168 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047701847 = queryNorm
          0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
    0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.0029728326 = product of:
    0.0059456653 = sum of:
      0.0059456653 = weight(_text_:a in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0059456653 = score(doc=484,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.05500247 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047701847 = queryNorm
          0.10809815 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    https%3A%2F%2Fjournals.univie.ac.at%2Findex.php%2Fvoebm%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F5332%2F5271%2F&usg=AOvVaw2yQdFGHlmOwVls7ANCpTii.
    Location
    A
    Type
    a
  11. Sauperl, S.A.: UDC as a standardisation method for providing titles of documents (2015) 0.05 
    0.04605957 = product of:
  0.09211914 = sum of:
    0.09211914 = sum of:
      0.014563846 = weight(_text_:a in 2302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.014563846 = score(doc=2302,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.05500247 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047701847 = queryNorm
          0.26478532 = fieldWeight in 2302, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2302)
      0.0775553 = weight(_text_:22 in 2302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0775553 = score(doc=2302,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16704375 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047701847 = queryNorm
          0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2302, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2302)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    10.11.2015 10:22:31
    Source
    Classification and authority control: expanding resource discovery: proceedings of the International UDC Seminar 2015, 29-30 October 2015, Lisbon, Portugal. Eds.: Slavic, A. u. M.I. Cordeiro
    Type
    a
  12. Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011) 0.05 
    0.04545791 = product of:
  0.09091582 = sum of:
    0.09091582 = product of:
      0.4545791 = sum of:
        0.4545791 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.4545791 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4044168 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047701847 = queryNorm
            1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
  13. Budd, J.M.: ¬A reply to Lingard (2013) 0.05 
    0.04509241 = sum of:
  0.04039195 = product of:
    0.20195976 = sum of:
      0.20195976 = weight(_text_:author's in 1762) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.20195976 = score(doc=1762,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.32056373 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047701847 = queryNorm
          0.63001436 = fieldWeight in 1762, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1762)
    0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.0047004614 = product of:
    0.009400923 = sum of:
      0.009400923 = weight(_text_:a in 1762) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.009400923 = score(doc=1762,freq=10.0), product of:
          0.05500247 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047701847 = queryNorm
          0.1709182 = fieldWeight in 1762, product of:
            3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
              10.0 = termFreq=10.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1762)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of the paper is to provide a critical reply to Robert Lingard's close reading of a previously published paper of the present author's, "Meaning, truth, and information." Design/methodology/approach - The approach adopted in this paper is an examination of Lingard's argument and counter-points, employing (primarily) logical and rhetorical analysis of his claims. Findings - While some of Lingard's criticisms are legitimate and must be admitted, many have to be subjected to rebuttal on the basis of misreading, logical error, and discursive misapprehension of points made in the original article. Originality/value - Since the present paper is a reply to another author's work, originality is constrained by the arguments and claims made by that author. That said, additional analysis is added to the matters of meaning, truth, and information in an effort to clarify and expand upon the essence of the original article.
    Type
    a
  14. Xiao, G.: ¬A knowledge classification model based on the relationship between science and human needs (2013) 0.04 
    0.044723313 = product of:
  0.08944663 = sum of:
    0.08944663 = sum of:
      0.011891331 = weight(_text_:a in 138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.011891331 = score(doc=138,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.05500247 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047701847 = queryNorm
          0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 138, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=138)
      0.0775553 = weight(_text_:22 in 138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0775553 = score(doc=138,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16704375 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047701847 = queryNorm
          0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 138, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=138)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 2.2013 12:36:34
    Type
    a
  15. Pohl, A.; Danowski, P.: Linked Open Data in der Bibliothekswelt : Überblick und Herausforderungen (2015) 0.04 
    0.044723313 = product of:
  0.08944663 = sum of:
    0.08944663 = sum of:
      0.011891331 = weight(_text_:a in 2057) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.011891331 = score(doc=2057,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.05500247 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047701847 = queryNorm
          0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 2057, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2057)
      0.0775553 = weight(_text_:22 in 2057) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0775553 = score(doc=2057,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16704375 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047701847 = queryNorm
          0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2057, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2057)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    26. 8.2015 10:22:00
    Type
    a
  16. Castro, A. de: Mental models may fail when faced with self-referential descriptors (2016) 0.04 
    0.044723313 = product of:
  0.08944663 = sum of:
    0.08944663 = sum of:
      0.011891331 = weight(_text_:a in 2485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.011891331 = score(doc=2485,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.05500247 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047701847 = queryNorm
          0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 2485, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2485)
      0.0775553 = weight(_text_:22 in 2485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0775553 = score(doc=2485,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16704375 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047701847 = queryNorm
          0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2485, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2485)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 1.2016 14:45:01
    Type
    a
  17. Loos, A.: ¬Die Million ist geknackt (2015) 0.04 
    0.044723313 = product of:
  0.08944663 = sum of:
    0.08944663 = sum of:
      0.011891331 = weight(_text_:a in 4208) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.011891331 = score(doc=4208,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.05500247 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047701847 = queryNorm
          0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 4208, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4208)
      0.0775553 = weight(_text_:22 in 4208) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0775553 = score(doc=4208,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16704375 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047701847 = queryNorm
          0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4208, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4208)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    7. 4.2015 17:22:03
    Type
    a
  18. Danell, R.: Can the quality of scientific work be predicted using information on the author's track record? (2011) 0.04 
    0.044032913 = sum of:
  0.04039195 = product of:
    0.20195976 = sum of:
      0.20195976 = weight(_text_:author's in 4131) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.20195976 = score(doc=4131,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.32056373 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047701847 = queryNorm
          0.63001436 = fieldWeight in 4131, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4131)
    0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.0036409616 = product of:
    0.007281923 = sum of:
      0.007281923 = weight(_text_:a in 4131) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.007281923 = score(doc=4131,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.05500247 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047701847 = queryNorm
          0.13239266 = fieldWeight in 4131, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4131)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Many countries are moving towards research policies that emphasize excellence; consequently; they develop evaluation systems to identify universities, research groups, and researchers that can be said to be "excellent." Such active research policy strategies, in which evaluations are used to concentrate resources, are based on an unsubstantiated assumption that researchers' track records are indicative of their future research performance. In this study, information on authors' track records (previous publication volume and previous citation rate) is used to predict the impact of their articles. The study concludes that, to a certain degree, the impact of scientific work can be predicted using information on how often an author's previous publications have been cited. The relationship between past performance and the citation rate of articles is strongest at the high end of the citation distribution. The implications of these results are discussed in the context of a cumulative advantage process.
    Type
    a
  19. Farazi, M.: Faceted lightweight ontologies : a formalization and some experiments (2010) 0.04 
    0.043949865 = sum of:
  0.037881594 = product of:
    0.18940796 = sum of:
      0.18940796 = weight(_text_:3a in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.18940796 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.4044168 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047701847 = queryNorm
          0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
    0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.0060682697 = product of:
    0.012136539 = sum of:
      0.012136539 = weight(_text_:a in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.012136539 = score(doc=4997,freq=24.0), product of:
          0.05500247 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047701847 = queryNorm
          0.22065444 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
            4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
              24.0 = termFreq=24.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    While classifications are heavily used to categorize web content, the evolution of the web foresees a more formal structure - ontology - which can serve this purpose. Ontologies are core artifacts of the Semantic Web which enable machines to use inference rules to conduct automated reasoning on data. Lightweight ontologies bridge the gap between classifications and ontologies. A lightweight ontology (LO) is an ontology representing a backbone taxonomy where the concept of the child node is more specific than the concept of the parent node. Formal lightweight ontologies can be generated from their informal ones. The key applications of formal lightweight ontologies are document classification, semantic search, and data integration. However, these applications suffer from the following problems: the disambiguation accuracy of the state of the art NLP tools used in generating formal lightweight ontologies from their informal ones; the lack of background knowledge needed for the formal lightweight ontologies; and the limitation of ontology reuse. In this dissertation, we propose a novel solution to these problems in formal lightweight ontologies; namely, faceted lightweight ontology (FLO). FLO is a lightweight ontology in which terms, present in each node label, and their concepts, are available in the background knowledge (BK), which is organized as a set of facets. A facet can be defined as a distinctive property of the groups of concepts that can help in differentiating one group from another. Background knowledge can be defined as a subset of a knowledge base, such as WordNet, and often represents a specific domain.
    Content
    PhD Dissertation at International Doctorate School in Information and Communication Technology. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fcore.ac.uk%2Fdownload%2Fpdf%2F150083013.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2n-qisNagpyT0lli_6QbAQ.
  20. Ahlgren, P.; Järvelin, K.: Measuring impact of twelve information scientists using the DCI index (2010) 0.04 
    0.043364786 = sum of:
  0.04039195 = product of:
    0.20195976 = sum of:
      0.20195976 = weight(_text_:author's in 3593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.20195976 = score(doc=3593,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.32056373 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047701847 = queryNorm
          0.63001436 = fieldWeight in 3593, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3593)
    0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.0029728326 = product of:
    0.0059456653 = sum of:
      0.0059456653 = weight(_text_:a in 3593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0059456653 = score(doc=3593,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.05500247 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047701847 = queryNorm
          0.10809815 = fieldWeight in 3593, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3593)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The Discounted Cumulated Impact (DCI) index has recently been proposed for research evaluation. In the present work an earlier dataset by Cronin and Meho (2007) is reanalyzed, with the aim of exemplifying the salient features of the DCI index. We apply the index on, and compare our results to, the outcomes of the Cronin-Meho (2007) study. Both authors and their top publications are used as units of analysis, which suggests that, by adjusting the parameters of evaluation according to the needs of research evaluation, the DCI index delivers data on an author's (or publication's) lifetime impact or current impact at the time of evaluation on an author's (or publication's) capability of inviting citations from highly cited later publications as an indication of impact, and on the relative impact across a set of authors (or publications) over their lifetime or currently.
    Type
    a

Authors

Languages

Types

  • a 5416
  • el 643
  • m 283
  • s 86
  • x 40
  • r 18
  • n 10
  • b 8
  • i 5
  • ag 2
  • p 1
  • v 1
  • z 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications