Search (1060 results, page 1 of 53)

0.110169254 = sum of:
  0.07010602 = product of:
    0.2804241 = sum of:
      0.2804241 = weight(_text_:3a in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.2804241 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.42767933 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050445713 = queryNorm
          0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.040063232 = product of:
    0.080126464 = sum of:
      0.080126464 = weight(_text_:w in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.080126464 = score(doc=5955,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.19223882 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050445713 = queryNorm
          0.41680688 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

Rez. in: Philosophisch-ethische Rezensionen vom 09.11.2019 (Jürgen Czogalla), Unter: https://philosophisch-ethische-rezensionen.de/rezension/Goedert1.html. In: B.I.T. online 23(2020) H.3, S.345-347 (W. Sühl-Strohmenger) [Unter: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.b-i-t-online.de%2Fheft%2F2020-03-rezensionen.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0iY3f_zNcvEjeZ6inHVnOK]. In: Open Password Nr. 805 vom 14.08.2020 (H.-C. Hobohm) [Unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzE0MywiOGI3NjZkZmNkZjQ1IiwwLDAsMTMxLDFd].

0.089572154 = product of:
  0.17914431 = sum of:
    0.17914431 = sum of:
      0.09712794 = weight(_text_:w in 1239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.09712794 = score(doc=1239,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19223882 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050445713 = queryNorm
          0.5052462 = fieldWeight in 1239, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1239)
      0.08201637 = weight(_text_:22 in 1239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08201637 = score(doc=1239,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1766523 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050445713 = queryNorm
          0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1239, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1239)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

18. 3.2014 19:13:22

0.089572154 = product of:
  0.17914431 = sum of:
    0.17914431 = sum of:
      0.09712794 = weight(_text_:w in 4693) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.09712794 = score(doc=4693,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19223882 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050445713 = queryNorm
          0.5052462 = fieldWeight in 4693, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4693)
      0.08201637 = weight(_text_:22 in 4693) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08201637 = score(doc=4693,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1766523 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050445713 = queryNorm
          0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4693, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4693)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Editor

Babik, W.

0.084372856 = sum of:
  0.060090873 = product of:
    0.2403635 = sum of:
      0.2403635 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.2403635 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.42767933 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050445713 = queryNorm
          0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.024281984 = product of:
    0.04856397 = sum of:
      0.04856397 = weight(_text_:w in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04856397 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19223882 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050445713 = queryNorm
          0.2526231 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.

0.073893264 = product of:
  0.14778653 = sum of:
    0.14778653 = sum of:
      0.080126464 = weight(_text_:w in 3103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.080126464 = score(doc=3103,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.19223882 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050445713 = queryNorm
          0.41680688 = fieldWeight in 3103, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3103)
      0.067660056 = weight(_text_:22 in 3103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.067660056 = score(doc=3103,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.1766523 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050445713 = queryNorm
          0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 3103, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3103)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Classification

HNQ (W)

Date

28. 9.2016 18:22:22

GHBS

HNQ (W)

0.06203737 = sum of:
  0.03775539 = product of:
    0.15102156 = sum of:
      0.15102156 = weight(_text_:author's in 3981) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.15102156 = score(doc=3981,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.33900294 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050445713 = queryNorm
          0.44548744 = fieldWeight in 3981, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3981)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.024281984 = product of:
    0.04856397 = sum of:
      0.04856397 = weight(_text_:w in 3981) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04856397 = score(doc=3981,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19223882 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050445713 = queryNorm
          0.2526231 = fieldWeight in 3981, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3981)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

In the interest of standardization and quality assurance, it is desirable for authors and staff of access services to follow the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) guidelines in preparing abstracts. Using the statistical approach an extraction system (the Abstraction Assistant) was developed to generate informative abstracts to meet the ANSI guidelines for structural content elements. The system performance is evaluated by comparing the system-generated abstracts with the author's original abstracts and the manually enhanced system abstracts on three criteria: balance (satisfaction of the ANSI standards), fluency (text coherence), and understandability (clarity). The results suggest that it is possible to use the system output directly without manual modification, but there are issues that need to be addressed in further studies to make the system a better tool.

0.061581895 = sum of:
  0.04449515 = product of:
    0.1779806 = sum of:
      0.1779806 = weight(_text_:author's in 5491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.1779806 = score(doc=5491,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.33900294 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050445713 = queryNorm
          0.52501196 = fieldWeight in 5491, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5491)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.017086744 = product of:
    0.03417349 = sum of:
      0.03417349 = weight(_text_:22 in 5491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03417349 = score(doc=5491,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1766523 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050445713 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5491, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5491)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

RDS are usually cross-disciplinary, centralised services, which are increasingly provided at a university by the academic library and in collaboration with other RDM stakeholders, such as the Research Office. At research-intensive universities, research data is generated in a wide range of disciplines and sub-disciplines. This paper will discuss how providing discipline-specific RDM support is approached by such universities and academic libraries, and the advantages and disadvantages of these central and discipline-specific approaches. A descriptive case study on the author's experiences of collaborating with a central RDS at the University of Cambridge, as a subject librarian embedded in an academic department, is a major component of this paper. The case study describes how centralised RDM services offered by the Office of Scholarly Communication (OSC) have been adapted to meet discipline-specific needs in the Department of Chemistry. It will introduce the department and the OSC, and describe the author's role in delivering RDM training, as well as the Data Champions programme, and their membership of the RDM Project Group. It will describe the outcomes of this collaboration for the Department of Chemistry, and for the centralised service. Centralised and discipline-specific approaches to RDS provision have their own advantages and disadvantages. Supporting the discipline-specific RDM needs of researchers is proving particularly challenging for universities to address sustainably: it requires adequate financial resources and staff skilled (or re-skilled) in RDM. A mixed approach is the most desirable, cost-effective way of providing RDS, but this still has constraints.

Date

7. 9.2019 21:30:22

0.060090873 = product of:
  0.12018175 = sum of:
    0.12018175 = product of:
      0.480727 = sum of:
        0.480727 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.480727 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.42767933 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050445713 = queryNorm
            1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.

0.060079418 = sum of:
  0.031462822 = product of:
    0.12585129 = sum of:
      0.12585129 = weight(_text_:author's in 4037) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.12585129 = score(doc=4037,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.33900294 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050445713 = queryNorm
          0.3712395 = fieldWeight in 4037, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4037)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.028616596 = product of:
    0.057233192 = sum of:
      0.057233192 = weight(_text_:w in 4037) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.057233192 = score(doc=4037,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.19223882 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050445713 = queryNorm
          0.2977192 = fieldWeight in 4037, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4037)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Decomposing a document written by more than one author into sentences based on authorship is of great significance due to the increasing demand for plagiarism detection, forensic analysis, civil law (i.e., disputed copyright issues), and intelligence issues that involve disputed anonymous documents. Among existing studies for document decomposition, some were limited by specific languages, according to topics or restricted to a document of two authors, and their accuracies have big room for improvement. In this paper, we consider the contextual correlation hidden among sentences and propose an algorithm for Sequential and Unsupervised Decomposition of a Multi-Author Document (SUDMAD) written in any language, disregarding topics, through the construction of a Hidden Markov Model (HMM) reflecting the authors' writing styles. To build and learn such a model, an unsupervised, statistical approach is first proposed to estimate the initial values of HMM parameters of a preliminary model, which does not require the availability of any information of author's or document's context other than how many authors contributed to writing the document. To further boost the performance of this approach, a boosted HMM learning procedure is proposed next, where the initial classification results are used to create labeled training data to learn a more accurate HMM. Moreover, the contextual relationship among sentences is further utilized to refine the classification results. Our proposed approach is empirically evaluated on three benchmark datasets that are widely used for authorship analysis of documents. Comparisons with recent state-of-the-art approaches are also presented to demonstrate the significance of our new ideas and the superior performance of our approach.

0.05971477 = product of:
  0.11942954 = sum of:
    0.11942954 = sum of:
      0.06475196 = weight(_text_:w in 1490) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06475196 = score(doc=1490,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19223882 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050445713 = queryNorm
          0.33683082 = fieldWeight in 1490, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1490)
      0.054677583 = weight(_text_:22 in 1490) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.054677583 = score(doc=1490,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1766523 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050445713 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1490, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1490)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 3.2015 9:30:24

0.05971477 = product of:
  0.11942954 = sum of:
    0.11942954 = sum of:
      0.06475196 = weight(_text_:w in 3814) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06475196 = score(doc=3814,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19223882 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050445713 = queryNorm
          0.33683082 = fieldWeight in 3814, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3814)
      0.054677583 = weight(_text_:22 in 3814) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.054677583 = score(doc=3814,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1766523 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050445713 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3814, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3814)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 7.2004 9:42:33

0.05825948 = sum of:
  0.03775539 = product of:
    0.15102156 = sum of:
      0.15102156 = weight(_text_:author's in 2360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.15102156 = score(doc=2360,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.33900294 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050445713 = queryNorm
          0.44548744 = fieldWeight in 2360, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2360)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.020504093 = product of:
    0.041008186 = sum of:
      0.041008186 = weight(_text_:22 in 2360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.041008186 = score(doc=2360,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1766523 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050445713 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2360, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2360)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This article reports the author's recent research in developing a holistic model for various levels of digital library (DL) evaluation in which perceived important criteria from heterogeneous stakeholder groups are organized and presented. To develop such a model, the author applied a three-stage research approach: exploration, confirmation, and verification. During the exploration stage, a literature review was conducted followed by an interview, along with a card sorting technique, to collect important criteria perceived by DL experts. Then the criteria identified were used for developing an online survey during the confirmation stage. Survey respondents (431 in total) from 22 countries rated the importance of the criteria. A holistic DL evaluation model was constructed using statistical techniques. Eventually, the verification stage was devised to test the reliability of the model in the context of searching and evaluating an operational DL. The proposed model fills two lacunae in the DL domain: (a) the lack of a comprehensive and flexible framework to guide and benchmark evaluations, and (b) the uncertainty about what divergence exists among heterogeneous DL stakeholders, including general users.

0.05825948 = sum of:
  0.03775539 = product of:
    0.15102156 = sum of:
      0.15102156 = weight(_text_:author's in 4359) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.15102156 = score(doc=4359,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.33900294 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050445713 = queryNorm
          0.44548744 = fieldWeight in 4359, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4359)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.020504093 = product of:
    0.041008186 = sum of:
      0.041008186 = weight(_text_:22 in 4359) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.041008186 = score(doc=4359,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1766523 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050445713 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4359, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4359)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

A recent study in information science (IS), raises important issues concerning the value of human indexing and basic theories of indexing and information retrieval, as well as the use of quantitative and qualitative approaches in IS and the underlying theories of knowledge informing the field. The present article uses L&E as the point of departure for demonstrating in what way more social and interpretative understandings may provide fruitful improvements for research in indexing, knowledge organization, and information retrieval. The artcle is motivated by the observation that philosophical contributions tend to be ignored in IS if they are not directly formed as criticisms or invitations to dialogs. It is part of the author's ongoing publication of articles about philosophical issues in IS and it is intended to be followed by analyzes of other examples of contributions to core issues in IS. Although it is formulated as a criticism of a specific paper, it should be seen as part of a general discussion of the philosophical foundation of IS and as a support to the emerging social paradigm in this field.

Date

17. 3.2011 19:22:55

0.053279154 = product of:
  0.10655831 = sum of:
    0.10655831 = sum of:
      0.04856397 = weight(_text_:w in 657) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04856397 = score(doc=657,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19223882 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050445713 = queryNorm
          0.2526231 = fieldWeight in 657, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=657)
      0.05799434 = weight(_text_:22 in 657) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05799434 = score(doc=657,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.1766523 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050445713 = queryNorm
          0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 657, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=657)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 3.2013 14:05:39

Source

Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 64(2013) H.1, S.9-22

0.052780904 = product of:
  0.10556181 = sum of:
    0.10556181 = sum of:
      0.057233192 = weight(_text_:w in 4319) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.057233192 = score(doc=4319,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.19223882 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050445713 = queryNorm
          0.2977192 = fieldWeight in 4319, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4319)
      0.048328612 = weight(_text_:22 in 4319) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.048328612 = score(doc=4319,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.1766523 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050445713 = queryNorm
          0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 4319, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4319)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Classification

IGFA (W)
MBL 22

GHBS

IGFA (W)

SSD

MBL 22

0.052250426 = product of:
  0.10450085 = sum of:
    0.10450085 = sum of:
      0.056657966 = weight(_text_:w in 1456) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.056657966 = score(doc=1456,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19223882 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050445713 = queryNorm
          0.29472697 = fieldWeight in 1456, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1456)
      0.047842886 = weight(_text_:22 in 1456) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.047842886 = score(doc=1456,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1766523 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050445713 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1456, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1456)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik

0.052250426 = product of:
  0.10450085 = sum of:
    0.10450085 = sum of:
      0.056657966 = weight(_text_:w in 2651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.056657966 = score(doc=2651,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19223882 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050445713 = queryNorm
          0.29472697 = fieldWeight in 2651, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2651)
      0.047842886 = weight(_text_:22 in 2651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.047842886 = score(doc=2651,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1766523 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050445713 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2651, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2651)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 1.2016 14:37:14

0.052250426 = product of:
  0.10450085 = sum of:
    0.10450085 = sum of:
      0.056657966 = weight(_text_:w in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.056657966 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19223882 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050445713 = queryNorm
          0.29472697 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
      0.047842886 = weight(_text_:22 in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.047842886 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1766523 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050445713 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Pages

S.22-36

Source

Theorie, Semantik und Organisation von Wissen: Proceedings der 13. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und dem 13. Internationalen Symposium der Informationswissenschaft der Higher Education Association for Information Science (HI) Potsdam (19.-20.03.2013): 'Theory, Information and Organization of Knowledge' / Proceedings der 14. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und Natural Language & Information Systems (NLDB) Passau (16.06.2015): 'Lexical Resources for Knowledge Organization' / Proceedings des Workshops der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) auf der SEMANTICS Leipzig (1.09.2014): 'Knowledge Organization and Semantic Web' / Proceedings des Workshops der Polnischen und Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) Cottbus (29.-30.09.2011): 'Economics of Knowledge Production and Organization'. Hrsg. von W. Babik, H.P. Ohly u. K. Weber

0.052250426 = product of:
  0.10450085 = sum of:
    0.10450085 = sum of:
      0.056657966 = weight(_text_:w in 3909) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.056657966 = score(doc=3909,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19223882 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050445713 = queryNorm
          0.29472697 = fieldWeight in 3909, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3909)
      0.047842886 = weight(_text_:22 in 3909) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.047842886 = score(doc=3909,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1766523 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050445713 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3909, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3909)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

20. 9.2018 12:22:39

0.050075732 = product of:
  0.100151464 = sum of:
    0.100151464 = product of:
      0.40060586 = sum of:
        0.40060586 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.40060586 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.42767933 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050445713 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja