-
Wolchover, N.: Wie ein Aufsehen erregender Beweis kaum Beachtung fand (2017)
0.10
0.09962118 = product of:
0.19924235 = sum of:
0.19924235 = sum of:
0.1030816 = weight(_text_:n in 3582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1030816 = score(doc=3582,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2163874 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
0.050186608 = queryNorm
0.47637522 = fieldWeight in 3582, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3582)
0.09616076 = weight(_text_:22 in 3582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09616076 = score(doc=3582,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17574495 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050186608 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3582, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3582)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 4.2017 10:42:05
22. 4.2017 10:48:38
-
Koppel, M.; Schweitzer, N.: Measuring direct and indirect authorial influence in historical corpora (2014)
0.09
0.091314584 = sum of:
0.05008195 = product of:
0.2003278 = sum of:
0.2003278 = weight(_text_:author's in 1506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2003278 = score(doc=1506,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3372617 = queryWeight, product of:
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.050186608 = queryNorm
0.59398323 = fieldWeight in 1506, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1506)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.041232638 = product of:
0.082465276 = sum of:
0.082465276 = weight(_text_:n in 1506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.082465276 = score(doc=1506,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2163874 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
0.050186608 = queryNorm
0.38110018 = fieldWeight in 1506, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1506)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- We show how automatically extracted citations in historical corpora can be used to measure the direct and indirect influence of authors on each other. These measures can in turn be used to determine an author's overall prominence in the corpus and to identify distinct schools of thought. We apply our methods to two major historical corpora. Using scholarly consensus as a gold standard, we demonstrate empirically the superiority of indirect influence over direct influence as a basis for various measures of authorial impact.
-
Paul-Hus, A.; Desrochers, N.; Rijcke, S.de; Rushforth, A.D.: ¬The reward system of science (2017)
0.09
0.08553876 = product of:
0.17107752 = sum of:
0.17107752 = sum of:
0.1030816 = weight(_text_:n in 3304) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1030816 = score(doc=3304,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2163874 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
0.050186608 = queryNorm
0.47637522 = fieldWeight in 3304, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3304)
0.06799593 = weight(_text_:22 in 3304) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06799593 = score(doc=3304,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17574495 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050186608 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3304, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3304)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
-
Rekabsaz, N. et al.: Toward optimized multimodal concept indexing (2016)
0.09
0.08553876 = product of:
0.17107752 = sum of:
0.17107752 = sum of:
0.1030816 = weight(_text_:n in 2751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1030816 = score(doc=2751,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2163874 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
0.050186608 = queryNorm
0.47637522 = fieldWeight in 2751, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2751)
0.06799593 = weight(_text_:22 in 2751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06799593 = score(doc=2751,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17574495 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050186608 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2751, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2751)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 1. 2.2016 18:25:22
-
Platis, N. et al.: Visualization of uncertainty in tag clouds (2016)
0.09
0.08553876 = product of:
0.17107752 = sum of:
0.17107752 = sum of:
0.1030816 = weight(_text_:n in 2755) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1030816 = score(doc=2755,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2163874 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
0.050186608 = queryNorm
0.47637522 = fieldWeight in 2755, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2755)
0.06799593 = weight(_text_:22 in 2755) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06799593 = score(doc=2755,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17574495 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050186608 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2755, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2755)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 1. 2.2016 18:25:22
-
Ford, N.: Introduction to information behaviour (2015)
0.09
0.08553876 = product of:
0.17107752 = sum of:
0.17107752 = sum of:
0.1030816 = weight(_text_:n in 3341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1030816 = score(doc=3341,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2163874 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
0.050186608 = queryNorm
0.47637522 = fieldWeight in 3341, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3341)
0.06799593 = weight(_text_:22 in 3341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06799593 = score(doc=3341,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17574495 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050186608 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3341, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3341)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2017 16:45:48
-
Häring, N.; Hensinger, P.: "Digitale Bildung" : Der abschüssige Weg zur Konditionierungsanstalt (2019)
0.09
0.08553876 = product of:
0.17107752 = sum of:
0.17107752 = sum of:
0.1030816 = weight(_text_:n in 4999) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1030816 = score(doc=4999,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2163874 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
0.050186608 = queryNorm
0.47637522 = fieldWeight in 4999, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4999)
0.06799593 = weight(_text_:22 in 4999) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06799593 = score(doc=4999,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17574495 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050186608 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4999, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4999)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 2.2019 11:45:19
-
Kaiser, R.; Ockenfeld, M.; Skurcz, N.: Wann versteht mich mein Computer endlich? : 1. DGI-Konfernz: Semantic Web & Linked Data - Elemente zukünftiger Informationsinfrastrukturen (2011)
0.07
0.068431005 = product of:
0.13686201 = sum of:
0.13686201 = sum of:
0.082465276 = weight(_text_:n in 4392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.082465276 = score(doc=4392,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2163874 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
0.050186608 = queryNorm
0.38110018 = fieldWeight in 4392, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4392)
0.05439674 = weight(_text_:22 in 4392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05439674 = score(doc=4392,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17574495 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050186608 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4392, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4392)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- BuB. 63(2011) H.1, S.22-23
-
Huang, M.; Barbour, J.; Su, C.; Contractor, N.: Why do group members provide information to digital knowledge repositories? : a multilevel application of transactive memory theory (2013)
0.06
0.06413259 = product of:
0.12826519 = sum of:
0.12826519 = sum of:
0.08746763 = weight(_text_:n in 666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08746763 = score(doc=666,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2163874 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
0.050186608 = queryNorm
0.40421778 = fieldWeight in 666, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=666)
0.040797554 = weight(_text_:22 in 666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040797554 = score(doc=666,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17574495 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050186608 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 666, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=666)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The proliferation of digital knowledge repositories (DKRs) used for distributed and collocated work raises important questions about how to manage these technologies. This study investigates why individuals contribute information to DKRs by applying and extending transactive memory theory. Data from knowledge workers (N = 208) nested in work groups (J = 17) located in Europe and the United States revealed, consistent with transactive memory theory, that perceptions of experts' retrieval of information were positively related to the likelihood of information provision to DKRs. The relationship between experts' perceptions of retrieval and information provision varied from group to group, and cross-level interactions indicated that trust in how the information would be used and the interdependence of tasks within groups could explain that variation. Furthermore, information provision to DKRs was related to communication networks in ways consistent with theorizing regarding the formation of transactive memory systems. Implications for theory and practice are discussed, emphasizing the utility of multilevel approaches for conceptualizing and modeling why individuals provide information to DKRs.
- Date
- 22. 3.2013 19:39:00
-
Schlicht, T.: Soziale Kognition (2011)
0.06
0.06413259 = product of:
0.12826519 = sum of:
0.12826519 = sum of:
0.08746763 = weight(_text_:n in 4583) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08746763 = score(doc=4583,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2163874 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
0.050186608 = queryNorm
0.40421778 = fieldWeight in 4583, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4583)
0.040797554 = weight(_text_:22 in 4583) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040797554 = score(doc=4583,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17574495 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050186608 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4583, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4583)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Der Mensch ist ein soziales Wesen, und im Alltag gehen wir unhinterfragt davon aus, dass andere Menschen wie wir selbst geistbegabt sind und somit Gefühle, Gedanken und Absichten haben, und wir geben diese Annahme nur in den äußersten Ausnahmefällen auf. Aber auf welche Weise gelangen wir überhaupt zu berechtigten Überzeugungen darüber, was genau andere in einer bestimmten Situation fühlen, denken oder beabsichtigen, wo uns doch ein direkter Zugang zu deren Psyche verwehrt zu sein scheint? Welche Strategie(n) verwenden wir, um Zugang zu der Psyche eines Anderen zu erhalten und welche Art(en) von Wissen sind dabei involviert? Orientieren wir uns eher an unserem eigenen Vorbild und projizieren unsere Vorstellungen in die andere Person hinein oder ähnelt unsere Fähigkeit zur sozialen Kognition eher unserem theoretischen Verständnis anderer 'Objekte'? Beruht unser Wissen über die Psyche eines Anderen auf unserem vorhergehenden Selbstverständnis oder sind intentionaler Selbst- und Frem dbezug systematisch gleichberechtigt? Diese und andere Fragen bewegen nicht nur Philosophen seit alters her, sondern gleichermaßen auch Psychologen sowie jüngst auch Neurowissenschaftler, die solchen Fähigkeiten zugrunde liegende psychologische Prozesse und neuronale Mechanismen im Gehirn untersuchen.
- Content
- Vgl.: http://www.information-philosophie.de/?a=1&t=7815&n=2#.
- Source
- Information Philosophie. 2014/2 (2014), S.22-27
-
Castle, C.: Getting the central RDM message across : a case study of central versus discipline-specific Research Data Services (RDS) at the University of Cambridge (2019)
0.06
0.061265588 = sum of:
0.044266608 = product of:
0.17706643 = sum of:
0.17706643 = weight(_text_:author's in 5491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17706643 = score(doc=5491,freq=4.0), product of:
0.3372617 = queryWeight, product of:
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.050186608 = queryNorm
0.52501196 = fieldWeight in 5491, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5491)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.016998982 = product of:
0.033997964 = sum of:
0.033997964 = weight(_text_:22 in 5491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033997964 = score(doc=5491,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17574495 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050186608 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5491, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5491)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- RDS are usually cross-disciplinary, centralised services, which are increasingly provided at a university by the academic library and in collaboration with other RDM stakeholders, such as the Research Office. At research-intensive universities, research data is generated in a wide range of disciplines and sub-disciplines. This paper will discuss how providing discipline-specific RDM support is approached by such universities and academic libraries, and the advantages and disadvantages of these central and discipline-specific approaches. A descriptive case study on the author's experiences of collaborating with a central RDS at the University of Cambridge, as a subject librarian embedded in an academic department, is a major component of this paper. The case study describes how centralised RDM services offered by the Office of Scholarly Communication (OSC) have been adapted to meet discipline-specific needs in the Department of Chemistry. It will introduce the department and the OSC, and describe the author's role in delivering RDM training, as well as the Data Champions programme, and their membership of the RDM Project Group. It will describe the outcomes of this collaboration for the Department of Chemistry, and for the centralised service. Centralised and discipline-specific approaches to RDS provision have their own advantages and disadvantages. Supporting the discipline-specific RDM needs of researchers is proving particularly challenging for universities to address sustainably: it requires adequate financial resources and staff skilled (or re-skilled) in RDM. A mixed approach is the most desirable, cost-effective way of providing RDS, but this still has constraints.
- Date
- 7. 9.2019 21:30:22
-
Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011)
0.06
0.05978223 = product of:
0.11956446 = sum of:
0.11956446 = product of:
0.47825783 = sum of:
0.47825783 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.47825783 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
0.42548263 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.050186608 = queryNorm
1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
-
Zhang, Y.: Developing a holistic model for digital library evaluation (2010)
0.06
0.057960242 = sum of:
0.037561465 = product of:
0.15024586 = sum of:
0.15024586 = weight(_text_:author's in 2360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15024586 = score(doc=2360,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3372617 = queryWeight, product of:
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.050186608 = queryNorm
0.44548744 = fieldWeight in 2360, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2360)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.020398777 = product of:
0.040797554 = sum of:
0.040797554 = weight(_text_:22 in 2360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040797554 = score(doc=2360,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17574495 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050186608 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2360, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2360)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This article reports the author's recent research in developing a holistic model for various levels of digital library (DL) evaluation in which perceived important criteria from heterogeneous stakeholder groups are organized and presented. To develop such a model, the author applied a three-stage research approach: exploration, confirmation, and verification. During the exploration stage, a literature review was conducted followed by an interview, along with a card sorting technique, to collect important criteria perceived by DL experts. Then the criteria identified were used for developing an online survey during the confirmation stage. Survey respondents (431 in total) from 22 countries rated the importance of the criteria. A holistic DL evaluation model was constructed using statistical techniques. Eventually, the verification stage was devised to test the reliability of the model in the context of searching and evaluating an operational DL. The proposed model fills two lacunae in the DL domain: (a) the lack of a comprehensive and flexible framework to guide and benchmark evaluations, and (b) the uncertainty about what divergence exists among heterogeneous DL stakeholders, including general users.
-
Hjoerland, B.: ¬The importance of theories of knowledge : indexing and information retrieval as an example (2011)
0.06
0.057960242 = sum of:
0.037561465 = product of:
0.15024586 = sum of:
0.15024586 = weight(_text_:author's in 4359) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15024586 = score(doc=4359,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3372617 = queryWeight, product of:
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.050186608 = queryNorm
0.44548744 = fieldWeight in 4359, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4359)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.020398777 = product of:
0.040797554 = sum of:
0.040797554 = weight(_text_:22 in 4359) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040797554 = score(doc=4359,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17574495 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050186608 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4359, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4359)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- A recent study in information science (IS), raises important issues concerning the value of human indexing and basic theories of indexing and information retrieval, as well as the use of quantitative and qualitative approaches in IS and the underlying theories of knowledge informing the field. The present article uses L&E as the point of departure for demonstrating in what way more social and interpretative understandings may provide fruitful improvements for research in indexing, knowledge organization, and information retrieval. The artcle is motivated by the observation that philosophical contributions tend to be ignored in IS if they are not directly formed as criticisms or invitations to dialogs. It is part of the author's ongoing publication of articles about philosophical issues in IS and it is intended to be followed by analyzes of other examples of contributions to core issues in IS. Although it is formulated as a criticism of a specific paper, it should be seen as part of a general discussion of the philosophical foundation of IS and as a support to the emerging social paradigm in this field.
- Date
- 17. 3.2011 19:22:55
-
Westman, S.; Laine-Hernandez, M.; Oittinen, P.: Development and evaluation of a multifaceted magazine image categorization model (2011)
0.05
0.053443834 = product of:
0.10688767 = sum of:
0.10688767 = sum of:
0.0728897 = weight(_text_:n in 4193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0728897 = score(doc=4193,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2163874 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
0.050186608 = queryNorm
0.33684817 = fieldWeight in 4193, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4193)
0.033997964 = weight(_text_:22 in 4193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033997964 = score(doc=4193,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17574495 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050186608 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4193, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4193)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The development of visual retrieval methods requires information about user interaction with images, including their description and categorization. This article presents the development of a categorization model for magazine images based on two user studies. In Study 1, we elicited 10 main classes of magazine image categorization criteria through sorting tasks with nonexpert and expert users (N=30). Multivariate methods, namely, multidimensional scaling and hierarchical clustering, were used to analyze similarity data. Content analysis of category names gave rise to classes that were synthesized into a categorization framework. The framework was evaluated in Study 2 by experts (N=24) who categorized another set of images consistent with the framework and found it to be useful in the task. Based on the evaluation study the framework was solidified into a model for categorizing magazine imagery. Connections between classes were analyzed both from the original sorting data and from the evaluation study and included into the final model. The model is a practical categorization tool that may be used in workplaces, such as magazine editorial offices. It may also serve to guide the development of computational methods for image understanding, selection of concepts for automatic detection, and approaches to support browsing and exploratory image search.
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 14:09:26
-
Frâncu, V.; Sabo, C.-N.: Implementation of a UDC-based multilingual thesaurus in a library catalogue : the case of BiblioPhil (2010)
0.05
0.051323257 = product of:
0.102646515 = sum of:
0.102646515 = sum of:
0.06184896 = weight(_text_:n in 3697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06184896 = score(doc=3697,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2163874 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
0.050186608 = queryNorm
0.28582513 = fieldWeight in 3697, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3697)
0.040797554 = weight(_text_:22 in 3697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040797554 = score(doc=3697,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17574495 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050186608 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3697, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3697)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2010 20:40:56
-
Hierl, S.; Bauer, L.; Böllers, N.; Herget, J.: Kollaborative Konzeption von Ontologien in der Hochschullehre : Theorie, Chancen und mögliche Umsetzung (2010)
0.05
0.051323257 = product of:
0.102646515 = sum of:
0.102646515 = sum of:
0.06184896 = weight(_text_:n in 3732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06184896 = score(doc=3732,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2163874 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
0.050186608 = queryNorm
0.28582513 = fieldWeight in 3732, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3732)
0.040797554 = weight(_text_:22 in 3732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040797554 = score(doc=3732,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17574495 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050186608 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3732, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3732)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
-
Wojdynski, B.W.; Kalyanaraman, S.: ¬The three dimensions of website navigability : explication and effects (2016)
0.05
0.051323257 = product of:
0.102646515 = sum of:
0.102646515 = sum of:
0.06184896 = weight(_text_:n in 2644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06184896 = score(doc=2644,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2163874 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
0.050186608 = queryNorm
0.28582513 = fieldWeight in 2644, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2644)
0.040797554 = weight(_text_:22 in 2644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040797554 = score(doc=2644,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17574495 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050186608 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2644, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2644)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Although the navigability of digital interfaces has been long discussed as a key determinant of media effects of web use, existing scholarship has not yielded a clear conceptual understanding of navigability, nor how to measure perceived navigability as an outcome. The present paper attempts to redress both and proposes that navigability be conceptually examined along three dimensions, namely, logic of structure, clarity of structure, and clarity of target. A 2?×?2?×?2 factorial between-subjects experiment (N?=?128) was conducted to examine distinct contributions of these dimensions to perceptions of a nonprofit website. The results showed significant effects for logic of structure and clarity on perceived navigability, while logic of structure and content domain involvement affected attitudes toward the website.
- Date
- 22. 1.2016 14:18:13
-
Thelwall, M.; Maflahi, N.: Guideline references and academic citations as evidence of the clinical value of health research (2016)
0.05
0.051323257 = product of:
0.102646515 = sum of:
0.102646515 = sum of:
0.06184896 = weight(_text_:n in 2856) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06184896 = score(doc=2856,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2163874 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
0.050186608 = queryNorm
0.28582513 = fieldWeight in 2856, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2856)
0.040797554 = weight(_text_:22 in 2856) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040797554 = score(doc=2856,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17574495 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050186608 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2856, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2856)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 19. 3.2016 12:22:00
-
Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014)
0.05
0.049818527 = product of:
0.099637054 = sum of:
0.099637054 = product of:
0.39854822 = sum of:
0.39854822 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.39854822 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
0.42548263 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.050186608 = queryNorm
0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
