-
Pohl, A.; Danowski, P.: Linked Open Data in der Bibliothekswelt : Überblick und Herausforderungen (2015)
0.08
0.08441131 = product of:
0.16882262 = sum of:
0.16882262 = sum of:
0.08663933 = weight(_text_:p in 2057) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08663933 = score(doc=2057,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18174732 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.050548375 = queryNorm
0.47670212 = fieldWeight in 2057, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2057)
0.08218329 = weight(_text_:22 in 2057) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08218329 = score(doc=2057,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1770118 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050548375 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2057, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2057)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 26. 8.2015 10:22:00
-
Shaw, R.; Golden, P.; Buckland, M.: Using linked library data in working research notes (2015)
0.08
0.08441131 = product of:
0.16882262 = sum of:
0.16882262 = sum of:
0.08663933 = weight(_text_:p in 2555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08663933 = score(doc=2555,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18174732 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.050548375 = queryNorm
0.47670212 = fieldWeight in 2555, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2555)
0.08218329 = weight(_text_:22 in 2555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08218329 = score(doc=2555,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1770118 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050548375 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2555, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2555)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 15. 1.2016 19:22:28
-
Foskett, D.J.: Systems theory and its relevance to documentary classification (2017)
0.08
0.08441131 = product of:
0.16882262 = sum of:
0.16882262 = sum of:
0.08663933 = weight(_text_:p in 3176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08663933 = score(doc=3176,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18174732 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.050548375 = queryNorm
0.47670212 = fieldWeight in 3176, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3176)
0.08218329 = weight(_text_:22 in 3176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08218329 = score(doc=3176,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1770118 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050548375 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3176, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3176)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 6. 5.2017 18:46:22
- Source
- International classification. 7(1980) no.1, p.2-5
-
Ahlgren, P.; Järvelin, K.: Measuring impact of twelve information scientists using the DCI index (2010)
0.08
0.07516267 = sum of:
0.05350284 = product of:
0.21401136 = sum of:
0.21401136 = weight(_text_:author's in 3593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.21401136 = score(doc=3593,freq=4.0), product of:
0.33969283 = queryWeight, product of:
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.050548375 = queryNorm
0.63001436 = fieldWeight in 3593, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3593)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.021659832 = product of:
0.043319665 = sum of:
0.043319665 = weight(_text_:p in 3593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043319665 = score(doc=3593,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18174732 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.050548375 = queryNorm
0.23835106 = fieldWeight in 3593, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3593)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The Discounted Cumulated Impact (DCI) index has recently been proposed for research evaluation. In the present work an earlier dataset by Cronin and Meho (2007) is reanalyzed, with the aim of exemplifying the salient features of the DCI index. We apply the index on, and compare our results to, the outcomes of the Cronin-Meho (2007) study. Both authors and their top publications are used as units of analysis, which suggests that, by adjusting the parameters of evaluation according to the needs of research evaluation, the DCI index delivers data on an author's (or publication's) lifetime impact or current impact at the time of evaluation on an author's (or publication's) capability of inviting citations from highly cited later publications as an indication of impact, and on the relative impact across a set of authors (or publications) over their lifetime or currently.
-
Drewer, P.; Massion, F; Pulitano, D: Was haben Wissensmodellierung, Wissensstrukturierung, künstliche Intelligenz und Terminologie miteinander zu tun? (2017)
0.07
0.070342764 = product of:
0.14068553 = sum of:
0.14068553 = sum of:
0.07219945 = weight(_text_:p in 5576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07219945 = score(doc=5576,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18174732 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.050548375 = queryNorm
0.39725178 = fieldWeight in 5576, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5576)
0.06848607 = weight(_text_:22 in 5576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06848607 = score(doc=5576,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1770118 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050548375 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5576, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5576)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 13.12.2017 14:17:22
-
Kozikowski, P. et al.: Support of part-whole relations in query answering (2016)
0.07
0.070342764 = product of:
0.14068553 = sum of:
0.14068553 = sum of:
0.07219945 = weight(_text_:p in 2754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07219945 = score(doc=2754,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18174732 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.050548375 = queryNorm
0.39725178 = fieldWeight in 2754, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2754)
0.06848607 = weight(_text_:22 in 2754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06848607 = score(doc=2754,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1770118 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050548375 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2754, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2754)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 1. 2.2016 18:25:22
-
Delahaye, J.-P.: Big brother an der Hintertür (2018)
0.07
0.070342764 = product of:
0.14068553 = sum of:
0.14068553 = sum of:
0.07219945 = weight(_text_:p in 4190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07219945 = score(doc=4190,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18174732 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.050548375 = queryNorm
0.39725178 = fieldWeight in 4190, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4190)
0.06848607 = weight(_text_:22 in 4190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06848607 = score(doc=4190,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1770118 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050548375 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4190, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4190)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 2.2018 16:55:48
-
Häring, N.; Hensinger, P.: "Digitale Bildung" : Der abschüssige Weg zur Konditionierungsanstalt (2019)
0.07
0.070342764 = product of:
0.14068553 = sum of:
0.14068553 = sum of:
0.07219945 = weight(_text_:p in 4999) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07219945 = score(doc=4999,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18174732 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.050548375 = queryNorm
0.39725178 = fieldWeight in 4999, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4999)
0.06848607 = weight(_text_:22 in 4999) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06848607 = score(doc=4999,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1770118 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050548375 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4999, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4999)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 2.2019 11:45:19
-
Castle, C.: Getting the central RDM message across : a case study of central versus discipline-specific Research Data Services (RDS) at the University of Cambridge (2019)
0.06
0.06170722 = sum of:
0.0445857 = product of:
0.1783428 = sum of:
0.1783428 = weight(_text_:author's in 5491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1783428 = score(doc=5491,freq=4.0), product of:
0.33969283 = queryWeight, product of:
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.050548375 = queryNorm
0.52501196 = fieldWeight in 5491, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5491)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.017121518 = product of:
0.034243036 = sum of:
0.034243036 = weight(_text_:22 in 5491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034243036 = score(doc=5491,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1770118 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050548375 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5491, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5491)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- RDS are usually cross-disciplinary, centralised services, which are increasingly provided at a university by the academic library and in collaboration with other RDM stakeholders, such as the Research Office. At research-intensive universities, research data is generated in a wide range of disciplines and sub-disciplines. This paper will discuss how providing discipline-specific RDM support is approached by such universities and academic libraries, and the advantages and disadvantages of these central and discipline-specific approaches. A descriptive case study on the author's experiences of collaborating with a central RDS at the University of Cambridge, as a subject librarian embedded in an academic department, is a major component of this paper. The case study describes how centralised RDM services offered by the Office of Scholarly Communication (OSC) have been adapted to meet discipline-specific needs in the Department of Chemistry. It will introduce the department and the OSC, and describe the author's role in delivering RDM training, as well as the Data Champions programme, and their membership of the RDM Project Group. It will describe the outcomes of this collaboration for the Department of Chemistry, and for the centralised service. Centralised and discipline-specific approaches to RDS provision have their own advantages and disadvantages. Supporting the discipline-specific RDM needs of researchers is proving particularly challenging for universities to address sustainably: it requires adequate financial resources and staff skilled (or re-skilled) in RDM. A mixed approach is the most desirable, cost-effective way of providing RDS, but this still has constraints.
- Date
- 7. 9.2019 21:30:22
-
Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011)
0.06
0.060213163 = product of:
0.12042633 = sum of:
0.12042633 = product of:
0.4817053 = sum of:
0.4817053 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.4817053 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
0.42854968 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.050548375 = queryNorm
1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
-
Sojka, P.; Liska, M.: ¬The art of mathematics retrieval (2011)
0.06
0.05916868 = product of:
0.11833736 = sum of:
0.11833736 = sum of:
0.05053961 = weight(_text_:p in 3450) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05053961 = score(doc=3450,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18174732 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.050548375 = queryNorm
0.27807623 = fieldWeight in 3450, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3450)
0.06779776 = weight(_text_:22 in 3450) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06779776 = score(doc=3450,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1770118 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050548375 = queryNorm
0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 3450, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3450)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Vgl.: DocEng2011, September 19-22, 2011, Mountain View, California, USA Copyright 2011 ACM 978-1-4503-0863-2/11/09
- Date
- 22. 2.2017 13:00:42
-
Zhang, Y.: Developing a holistic model for digital library evaluation (2010)
0.06
0.058378045 = sum of:
0.037832223 = product of:
0.15132889 = sum of:
0.15132889 = weight(_text_:author's in 2360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15132889 = score(doc=2360,freq=2.0), product of:
0.33969283 = queryWeight, product of:
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.050548375 = queryNorm
0.44548744 = fieldWeight in 2360, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2360)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.020545822 = product of:
0.041091643 = sum of:
0.041091643 = weight(_text_:22 in 2360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041091643 = score(doc=2360,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1770118 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050548375 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2360, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2360)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This article reports the author's recent research in developing a holistic model for various levels of digital library (DL) evaluation in which perceived important criteria from heterogeneous stakeholder groups are organized and presented. To develop such a model, the author applied a three-stage research approach: exploration, confirmation, and verification. During the exploration stage, a literature review was conducted followed by an interview, along with a card sorting technique, to collect important criteria perceived by DL experts. Then the criteria identified were used for developing an online survey during the confirmation stage. Survey respondents (431 in total) from 22 countries rated the importance of the criteria. A holistic DL evaluation model was constructed using statistical techniques. Eventually, the verification stage was devised to test the reliability of the model in the context of searching and evaluating an operational DL. The proposed model fills two lacunae in the DL domain: (a) the lack of a comprehensive and flexible framework to guide and benchmark evaluations, and (b) the uncertainty about what divergence exists among heterogeneous DL stakeholders, including general users.
-
Hjoerland, B.: ¬The importance of theories of knowledge : indexing and information retrieval as an example (2011)
0.06
0.058378045 = sum of:
0.037832223 = product of:
0.15132889 = sum of:
0.15132889 = weight(_text_:author's in 4359) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15132889 = score(doc=4359,freq=2.0), product of:
0.33969283 = queryWeight, product of:
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.050548375 = queryNorm
0.44548744 = fieldWeight in 4359, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4359)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.020545822 = product of:
0.041091643 = sum of:
0.041091643 = weight(_text_:22 in 4359) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041091643 = score(doc=4359,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1770118 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050548375 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4359, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4359)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- A recent study in information science (IS), raises important issues concerning the value of human indexing and basic theories of indexing and information retrieval, as well as the use of quantitative and qualitative approaches in IS and the underlying theories of knowledge informing the field. The present article uses L&E as the point of departure for demonstrating in what way more social and interpretative understandings may provide fruitful improvements for research in indexing, knowledge organization, and information retrieval. The artcle is motivated by the observation that philosophical contributions tend to be ignored in IS if they are not directly formed as criticisms or invitations to dialogs. It is part of the author's ongoing publication of articles about philosophical issues in IS and it is intended to be followed by analyzes of other examples of contributions to core issues in IS. Although it is formulated as a criticism of a specific paper, it should be seen as part of a general discussion of the philosophical foundation of IS and as a support to the emerging social paradigm in this field.
- Date
- 17. 3.2011 19:22:55
-
Ohly, P.: Dimensions of globality : a bibliometric analysis (2016)
0.06
0.056274205 = product of:
0.11254841 = sum of:
0.11254841 = sum of:
0.057759553 = weight(_text_:p in 4942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057759553 = score(doc=4942,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18174732 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.050548375 = queryNorm
0.31780142 = fieldWeight in 4942, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4942)
0.054788858 = weight(_text_:22 in 4942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054788858 = score(doc=4942,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1770118 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050548375 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4942, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4942)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 20. 1.2019 11:22:31
-
Ménard, E.; Khashman, N.; Kochkina, S.; Torres-Moreno, J.-M.; Velazquez-Morales, P.; Zhou, F.; Jourlin, P.; Rawat, P.; Peinl, P.; Linhares Pontes, E.; Brunetti., I.: ¬A second life for TIIARA : from bilingual to multilingual! (2016)
0.05
0.05322124 = product of:
0.10644248 = sum of:
0.10644248 = sum of:
0.07219945 = weight(_text_:p in 2834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07219945 = score(doc=2834,freq=8.0), product of:
0.18174732 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.050548375 = queryNorm
0.39725178 = fieldWeight in 2834, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2834)
0.034243036 = weight(_text_:22 in 2834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034243036 = score(doc=2834,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1770118 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050548375 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2834, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2834)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Knowledge organization. 43(2016) no.1, S.22-34
-
Hajibayova, L.; Jacob, E.K.: User-generated genre tags through the lens of genre theories (2014)
0.05
0.05190157 = product of:
0.10380314 = sum of:
0.10380314 = sum of:
0.076408714 = weight(_text_:p in 1450) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.076408714 = score(doc=1450,freq=14.0), product of:
0.18174732 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.050548375 = queryNorm
0.42041177 = fieldWeight in 1450, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1450)
0.027394429 = weight(_text_:22 in 1450) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027394429 = score(doc=1450,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1770118 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050548375 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1450, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1450)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- LIS genre studies have suggested that representing the genre of a resource could provide better knowledge representation, organization and retrieval (e.g., Andersen, 2008; Crowston & Kwasnik, 2003). Beghtol (2001) argues that genre analysis could be a useful tool for creating a "framework of analysis for a domain ... [to] structure and interpret texts, events, ideas, decisions, explanations and every other human activity in that domain" (p. 19). Although some studies of user-generated tagging vocabularies have found a preponderance of content-related tags (e.g., Munk & Mork, 2007), Lamere's (2008) study of the most frequently applied tags at Last.fm found that tags representing musical genres were favored by taggers. Studies of user-generated genre tags suggest that, unlike traditional indexing, which generally assigns a single genre, users' assignments of genre-related tags provide better representation of the fuzziness at the boundaries of genre categories (Inskip, 2009). In this way, user-generated genre tags are more in line with Bakhtin's (Bakhtin & Medvedev, 1928/1985) conceptualization of genre as an "aggregate of the means for seeing and conceptualizin reality" (p. 137). For Bakhtin (1986), genres are kinds of practice characterized by their "addressivity" (p. 95): Different genres correspond to different "conceptions of the addressee" and are "determined by that area of human activity and everyday life to which the given utterance is related" (p.95). Miller (1984) argues that genre refers to a "conventional category of discourse based in large-scale typification of rhetorical action; as action, it acquires meaning from situation and from the social context in which that situation arose" (p. 163). Genre is part of a social context that produces, reproduces, modifies and ultimately represents a particular text, but how to reunite genre and situation (or text and context) in systems of knowledge organization has not been addressed. Based on Devitt's (1993) argument suggesting that "our construction of genre is what helps us to construct a situation" (p. 577), one way to represent genre as "typified rhetorical actions based in recurrent situations" (Miller, 1984, p. 159) would be to employ genre tags generated by a particular group or community of users. This study suggests application of social network analysis to detect communities (Newman, 2006) of genre taggers and argues that communities of genre taggers can better define the nature and constitution of a discourse community while simultaneously shedding light on multifaceted representations of the resource genres.
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
¬Die deutsche Zeitschrift für Dokumentation, Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis von 1950 bis 2011 : eine vorläufige Bilanz in vier Abschnitten (2012)
0.05
0.051177453 = product of:
0.10235491 = sum of:
0.10235491 = sum of:
0.061263263 = weight(_text_:p in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061263263 = score(doc=402,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18174732 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.050548375 = queryNorm
0.33707932 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
0.041091643 = weight(_text_:22 in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041091643 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1770118 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050548375 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2012 19:35:26
- Footnote
- Besteht aus 4 Teilen: Teil 1: Eden, D., A. Arndt, A. Hoffer, T. Raschke u. P. Schön: Die Nachrichten für Dokumentation in den Jahren 1950 bis 1962 (S.159-163). Teil 2: Brose, M., E. durst, D. Nitzsche, D. Veckenstedt u. R. Wein: Statistische Untersuchung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) 1963-1975 (S.164-170). Teil 3: Bösel, J., G. Ebert, P. Garz,, M. Iwanow u. B. Russ: Methoden und Ergebnisse einer statistischen Auswertung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) 1976 bis 1988 (S.171-174). Teil 4: Engelage, H., S. Jansen, R. Mertins, K. Redel u. S. Ring: Statistische Untersuchung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) / "Information. Wissenschaft & Praxis" (IWP) 1989-2011 (S.164-170).
-
Treude, L.: ¬Das Problem der Konzeptdefinition in der Wissensorganisation : über einen missglückten Versuch der Klärung (2013)
0.05
0.051177453 = product of:
0.10235491 = sum of:
0.10235491 = sum of:
0.061263263 = weight(_text_:p in 3060) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061263263 = score(doc=3060,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18174732 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.050548375 = queryNorm
0.33707932 = fieldWeight in 3060, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3060)
0.041091643 = weight(_text_:22 in 3060) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041091643 = score(doc=3060,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1770118 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050548375 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3060, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3060)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Alon Friedman und Richard P. Smiraglia kündigen in ihrem aktuellen Artikel "Nodes and arcs: concept map, semiotics, and knowledge organization" an, eine "empirical demonstration of how the domain [of knowledge organisation] itself understands the meaning of a concept" durchzuführen. Die Klärung des Konzeptbegriffs ist ein begrüßenswertes Vorhaben, das die Autoren in einer empirischen Untersuchung von concept maps (also Konzeptdiagrammen) aus dem Bereich der Wissensorganisation nachvollziehen wollen. Beschränkte sich Friedman 2011 in seinem Artikel "Concept theory and semiotics in knowledge organization" [Fn 01] noch ausschließlich auf Sprache als Medium im Zeichenprozess, bezieht er sich nun auf Visualisierungen als Repräsentationsform und scheint somit seinen Ansatz um den Aspekt der Bildlichkeit zu erweitern. Zumindest erwartet man dies nach der Lektüre der Beschreibung des aktuellen Vorhabens von Friedman und Smiraglia, das - wie die Autoren verkünden - auf einer semiotischen Grundlage durchgeführt worden sei.
- Content
- Vgl.: http://www.libreas.eu/09treude.htm. Bezug zu: Alon Friedman, Richard P. Smiraglia, (2013): Nodes and arcs: concept map, semiotics, and knowledge organization. In: Journal of Documentation, Vol. 69/1, S.27-48.
- Source
- LIBREAS: Library ideas. no.22, 2013, S.xx-xx
-
Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014)
0.05
0.050177637 = product of:
0.100355275 = sum of:
0.100355275 = product of:
0.4014211 = sum of:
0.4014211 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.4014211 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
0.42854968 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.050548375 = queryNorm
0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
-
Schaer, P.: Integration von Open-Access-Repositorien in Fachportale (2010)
0.05
0.04923993 = product of:
0.09847986 = sum of:
0.09847986 = sum of:
0.05053961 = weight(_text_:p in 2320) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05053961 = score(doc=2320,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18174732 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.050548375 = queryNorm
0.27807623 = fieldWeight in 2320, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2320)
0.04794025 = weight(_text_:22 in 2320) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04794025 = score(doc=2320,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1770118 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050548375 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2320, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2320)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
