Search (2046 results, page 1 of 103)

  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014) 0.12
    0.11867264 = sum of:
      0.10123012 = product of:
        0.4049205 = sum of:
          0.4049205 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.4049205 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.43228558 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05098903 = queryNorm
              0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.017442517 = product of:
        0.034885034 = sum of:
          0.034885034 = weight(_text_:m in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.034885034 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.12688358 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05098903 = queryNorm
              0.27493733 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
  2. Gödert, W.; Lepsky, K.: Informationelle Kompetenz : ein humanistischer Entwurf (2019) 0.08
    0.083070844 = sum of:
      0.070861086 = product of:
        0.28344434 = sum of:
          0.28344434 = weight(_text_:3a in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.28344434 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.43228558 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05098903 = queryNorm
              0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.012209761 = product of:
        0.024419522 = sum of:
          0.024419522 = weight(_text_:m in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.024419522 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.12688358 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05098903 = queryNorm
              0.19245613 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Philosophisch-ethische Rezensionen vom 09.11.2019 (Jürgen Czogalla), Unter: https://philosophisch-ethische-rezensionen.de/rezension/Goedert1.html. In: B.I.T. online 23(2020) H.3, S.345-347 (W. Sühl-Strohmenger) [Unter: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.b-i-t-online.de%2Fheft%2F2020-03-rezensionen.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0iY3f_zNcvEjeZ6inHVnOK]. In: Open Password Nr. 805 vom 14.08.2020 (H.-C. Hobohm) [Unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzE0MywiOGI3NjZkZmNkZjQ1IiwwLDAsMTMxLDFd].
    Type
    m
  3. Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019) 0.08
    0.07553854 = sum of:
      0.06073807 = product of:
        0.24295229 = sum of:
          0.24295229 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.24295229 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.43228558 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05098903 = queryNorm
              0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.014800466 = product of:
        0.029600931 = sum of:
          0.029600931 = weight(_text_:m in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.029600931 = score(doc=400,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.12688358 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05098903 = queryNorm
              0.23329206 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
  4. Koppel, M.; Schweitzer, N.: Measuring direct and indirect authorial influence in historical corpora (2014) 0.06
    0.06483671 = sum of:
      0.050882697 = product of:
        0.20353079 = sum of:
          0.20353079 = weight(_text_:author's in 1506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.20353079 = score(doc=1506,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.3426541 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05098903 = queryNorm
              0.59398323 = fieldWeight in 1506, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1506)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.013954013 = product of:
        0.027908025 = sum of:
          0.027908025 = weight(_text_:m in 1506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.027908025 = score(doc=1506,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.12688358 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05098903 = queryNorm
              0.21994986 = fieldWeight in 1506, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1506)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    We show how automatically extracted citations in historical corpora can be used to measure the direct and indirect influence of authors on each other. These measures can in turn be used to determine an author's overall prominence in the corpus and to identify distinct schools of thought. We apply our methods to two major historical corpora. Using scholarly consensus as a gold standard, we demonstrate empirically the superiority of indirect influence over direct influence as a basis for various measures of authorial impact.
  5. EndNote X7 : bibliographies made easy [= Version 17] (2013) 0.06
    0.06238088 = product of:
      0.12476176 = sum of:
        0.12476176 = sum of:
          0.04186204 = weight(_text_:m in 1808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04186204 = score(doc=1808,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.12688358 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05098903 = queryNorm
              0.3299248 = fieldWeight in 1808, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1808)
          0.08289972 = weight(_text_:22 in 1808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08289972 = score(doc=1808,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1785549 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05098903 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1808, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1808)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    17. 9.2018 18:19:22
    Type
    m
  6. Shaw, R.; Golden, P.; Buckland, M.: Using linked library data in working research notes (2015) 0.06
    0.06238088 = product of:
      0.12476176 = sum of:
        0.12476176 = sum of:
          0.04186204 = weight(_text_:m in 2555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04186204 = score(doc=2555,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.12688358 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05098903 = queryNorm
              0.3299248 = fieldWeight in 2555, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2555)
          0.08289972 = weight(_text_:22 in 2555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08289972 = score(doc=2555,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1785549 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05098903 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2555, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2555)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    15. 1.2016 19:22:28
  7. Knowledge organization in the 21st century : between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland (2014) 0.06
    0.06238088 = product of:
      0.12476176 = sum of:
        0.12476176 = sum of:
          0.04186204 = weight(_text_:m in 4693) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04186204 = score(doc=4693,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.12688358 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05098903 = queryNorm
              0.3299248 = fieldWeight in 4693, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4693)
          0.08289972 = weight(_text_:22 in 4693) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08289972 = score(doc=4693,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1785549 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05098903 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4693, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4693)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    m
  8. Hauer, M.: Tiefenindexierung im Bibliothekskatalog : 17 Jahre intelligentCAPTURE (2019) 0.06
    0.06238088 = product of:
      0.12476176 = sum of:
        0.12476176 = sum of:
          0.04186204 = weight(_text_:m in 5629) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04186204 = score(doc=5629,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.12688358 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05098903 = queryNorm
              0.3299248 = fieldWeight in 5629, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5629)
          0.08289972 = weight(_text_:22 in 5629) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08289972 = score(doc=5629,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1785549 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05098903 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5629, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5629)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    B.I.T.online. 22(2019) H.2, S.163-166
  9. Castle, C.: Getting the central RDM message across : a case study of central versus discipline-specific Research Data Services (RDS) at the University of Cambridge (2019) 0.06
    0.062245153 = sum of:
      0.044974376 = product of:
        0.1798975 = sum of:
          0.1798975 = weight(_text_:author's in 5491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.1798975 = score(doc=5491,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.3426541 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05098903 = queryNorm
              0.52501196 = fieldWeight in 5491, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5491)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.017270776 = product of:
        0.03454155 = sum of:
          0.03454155 = weight(_text_:22 in 5491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03454155 = score(doc=5491,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1785549 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05098903 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5491, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5491)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    RDS are usually cross-disciplinary, centralised services, which are increasingly provided at a university by the academic library and in collaboration with other RDM stakeholders, such as the Research Office. At research-intensive universities, research data is generated in a wide range of disciplines and sub-disciplines. This paper will discuss how providing discipline-specific RDM support is approached by such universities and academic libraries, and the advantages and disadvantages of these central and discipline-specific approaches. A descriptive case study on the author's experiences of collaborating with a central RDS at the University of Cambridge, as a subject librarian embedded in an academic department, is a major component of this paper. The case study describes how centralised RDM services offered by the Office of Scholarly Communication (OSC) have been adapted to meet discipline-specific needs in the Department of Chemistry. It will introduce the department and the OSC, and describe the author's role in delivering RDM training, as well as the Data Champions programme, and their membership of the RDM Project Group. It will describe the outcomes of this collaboration for the Department of Chemistry, and for the centralised service. Centralised and discipline-specific approaches to RDS provision have their own advantages and disadvantages. Supporting the discipline-specific RDM needs of researchers is proving particularly challenging for universities to address sustainably: it requires adequate financial resources and staff skilled (or re-skilled) in RDM. A mixed approach is the most desirable, cost-effective way of providing RDS, but this still has constraints.
    Date
    7. 9.2019 21:30:22
  10. Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011) 0.06
    0.06073807 = product of:
      0.12147614 = sum of:
        0.12147614 = product of:
          0.48590457 = sum of:
            0.48590457 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.48590457 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.43228558 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05098903 = queryNorm
                1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
  11. Farazi, M.: Faceted lightweight ontologies : a formalization and some experiments (2010) 0.06
    0.05933632 = sum of:
      0.05061506 = product of:
        0.20246024 = sum of:
          0.20246024 = weight(_text_:3a in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.20246024 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.43228558 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05098903 = queryNorm
              0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.0087212585 = product of:
        0.017442517 = sum of:
          0.017442517 = weight(_text_:m in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.017442517 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.12688358 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05098903 = queryNorm
              0.13746867 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    PhD Dissertation at International Doctorate School in Information and Communication Technology. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fcore.ac.uk%2Fdownload%2Fpdf%2F150083013.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2n-qisNagpyT0lli_6QbAQ.
  12. Zhang, Y.: Developing a holistic model for digital library evaluation (2010) 0.06
    0.058886956 = sum of:
      0.038162027 = product of:
        0.1526481 = sum of:
          0.1526481 = weight(_text_:author's in 2360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.1526481 = score(doc=2360,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.3426541 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05098903 = queryNorm
              0.44548744 = fieldWeight in 2360, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2360)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.02072493 = product of:
        0.04144986 = sum of:
          0.04144986 = weight(_text_:22 in 2360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04144986 = score(doc=2360,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1785549 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05098903 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2360, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2360)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This article reports the author's recent research in developing a holistic model for various levels of digital library (DL) evaluation in which perceived important criteria from heterogeneous stakeholder groups are organized and presented. To develop such a model, the author applied a three-stage research approach: exploration, confirmation, and verification. During the exploration stage, a literature review was conducted followed by an interview, along with a card sorting technique, to collect important criteria perceived by DL experts. Then the criteria identified were used for developing an online survey during the confirmation stage. Survey respondents (431 in total) from 22 countries rated the importance of the criteria. A holistic DL evaluation model was constructed using statistical techniques. Eventually, the verification stage was devised to test the reliability of the model in the context of searching and evaluating an operational DL. The proposed model fills two lacunae in the DL domain: (a) the lack of a comprehensive and flexible framework to guide and benchmark evaluations, and (b) the uncertainty about what divergence exists among heterogeneous DL stakeholders, including general users.
  13. Hjoerland, B.: ¬The importance of theories of knowledge : indexing and information retrieval as an example (2011) 0.06
    0.058886956 = sum of:
      0.038162027 = product of:
        0.1526481 = sum of:
          0.1526481 = weight(_text_:author's in 4359) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.1526481 = score(doc=4359,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.3426541 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05098903 = queryNorm
              0.44548744 = fieldWeight in 4359, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4359)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.02072493 = product of:
        0.04144986 = sum of:
          0.04144986 = weight(_text_:22 in 4359) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04144986 = score(doc=4359,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1785549 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05098903 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4359, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4359)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    A recent study in information science (IS), raises important issues concerning the value of human indexing and basic theories of indexing and information retrieval, as well as the use of quantitative and qualitative approaches in IS and the underlying theories of knowledge informing the field. The present article uses L&E as the point of departure for demonstrating in what way more social and interpretative understandings may provide fruitful improvements for research in indexing, knowledge organization, and information retrieval. The artcle is motivated by the observation that philosophical contributions tend to be ignored in IS if they are not directly formed as criticisms or invitations to dialogs. It is part of the author's ongoing publication of articles about philosophical issues in IS and it is intended to be followed by analyzes of other examples of contributions to core issues in IS. Although it is formulated as a criticism of a specific paper, it should be seen as part of a general discussion of the philosophical foundation of IS and as a support to the emerging social paradigm in this field.
    Date
    17. 3.2011 19:22:55
  14. Burghardt, M.; Wolff, C.; Womser-Hacker, C.: Informationsinfrastruktur und informationswissenschaftliche Methoden in den digitalen Geisteswissenschaften (2015) 0.05
    0.051984068 = product of:
      0.103968136 = sum of:
        0.103968136 = sum of:
          0.034885034 = weight(_text_:m in 1838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.034885034 = score(doc=1838,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.12688358 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05098903 = queryNorm
              0.27493733 = fieldWeight in 1838, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1838)
          0.0690831 = weight(_text_:22 in 1838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0690831 = score(doc=1838,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1785549 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05098903 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1838, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1838)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    6.12.2015 17:22:08
  15. Pobar, M. et al.: Multimodal image retrieval based on keywords and low-level image features (2016) 0.05
    0.051984068 = product of:
      0.103968136 = sum of:
        0.103968136 = sum of:
          0.034885034 = weight(_text_:m in 2757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.034885034 = score(doc=2757,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.12688358 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05098903 = queryNorm
              0.27493733 = fieldWeight in 2757, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2757)
          0.0690831 = weight(_text_:22 in 2757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0690831 = score(doc=2757,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1785549 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05098903 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2757, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2757)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    1. 2.2016 18:25:22
  16. Schönherr, M.: Bestechend brillant : die Schönheit der Algorithmen (2016) 0.05
    0.051984068 = product of:
      0.103968136 = sum of:
        0.103968136 = sum of:
          0.034885034 = weight(_text_:m in 2762) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.034885034 = score(doc=2762,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.12688358 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05098903 = queryNorm
              0.27493733 = fieldWeight in 2762, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2762)
          0.0690831 = weight(_text_:22 in 2762) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0690831 = score(doc=2762,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1785549 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05098903 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2762, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2762)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 2.2016 17:22:23
  17. Burghardt, M.; Hertlein, F.; Hinterleitner, B.; Lehenmeier, C.; Spröd, T.: ¬A crowdsourced approach for the documentation and transcription of graffiti in public restrooms (2015) 0.05
    0.051984068 = product of:
      0.103968136 = sum of:
        0.103968136 = sum of:
          0.034885034 = weight(_text_:m in 2991) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.034885034 = score(doc=2991,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.12688358 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05098903 = queryNorm
              0.27493733 = fieldWeight in 2991, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2991)
          0.0690831 = weight(_text_:22 in 2991) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0690831 = score(doc=2991,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1785549 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05098903 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2991, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2991)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    6. 6.2016 18:42:22
  18. Mora-Mcginity, M. et al.: MusicWeb: music discovery with open linked semantic metadata (2016) 0.05
    0.051984068 = product of:
      0.103968136 = sum of:
        0.103968136 = sum of:
          0.034885034 = weight(_text_:m in 3282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.034885034 = score(doc=3282,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.12688358 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05098903 = queryNorm
              0.27493733 = fieldWeight in 3282, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3282)
          0.0690831 = weight(_text_:22 in 3282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0690831 = score(doc=3282,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1785549 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05098903 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3282, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3282)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
  19. Ford, N.: Introduction to information behaviour (2015) 0.05
    0.051984068 = product of:
      0.103968136 = sum of:
        0.103968136 = sum of:
          0.034885034 = weight(_text_:m in 3341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.034885034 = score(doc=3341,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.12688358 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05098903 = queryNorm
              0.27493733 = fieldWeight in 3341, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3341)
          0.0690831 = weight(_text_:22 in 3341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0690831 = score(doc=3341,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1785549 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05098903 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3341, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3341)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2017 16:45:48
    Type
    m
  20. Nielsen, M.: Neuronale Netze : Alpha Go - Computer lernen Intuition (2018) 0.05
    0.051984068 = product of:
      0.103968136 = sum of:
        0.103968136 = sum of:
          0.034885034 = weight(_text_:m in 4523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.034885034 = score(doc=4523,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.12688358 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05098903 = queryNorm
              0.27493733 = fieldWeight in 4523, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4523)
          0.0690831 = weight(_text_:22 in 4523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0690831 = score(doc=4523,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1785549 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05098903 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4523, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4523)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 2018, H.1, S.22-27

Authors

Languages

  • e 1359
  • d 658
  • a 1
  • hu 1
  • m 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 1481
  • m 469
  • el 181
  • s 106
  • x 28
  • r 13
  • b 6
  • n 3
  • i 2
  • l 1
  • p 1
  • v 1
  • z 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications