Search (1101 results, page 1 of 56)

0.14321749 = sum of:
  0.10002469 = product of:
    0.40009877 = sum of:
      0.40009877 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.40009877 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.42713797 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05038186 = queryNorm
          0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.043192793 = product of:
    0.086385585 = sum of:
      0.086385585 = weight(_text_:t in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.086385585 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19847474 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05038186 = queryNorm
          0.43524727 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja

0.10025224 = sum of:
  0.070017286 = product of:
    0.28006914 = sum of:
      0.28006914 = weight(_text_:3a in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.28006914 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.42713797 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05038186 = queryNorm
          0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.030234953 = product of:
    0.060469907 = sum of:
      0.060469907 = weight(_text_:t in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.060469907 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19847474 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05038186 = queryNorm
          0.30467308 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

Rez. in: Philosophisch-ethische Rezensionen vom 09.11.2019 (Jürgen Czogalla), Unter: https://philosophisch-ethische-rezensionen.de/rezension/Goedert1.html. In: B.I.T. online 23(2020) H.3, S.345-347 (W. Sühl-Strohmenger) [Unter: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.b-i-t-online.de%2Fheft%2F2020-03-rezensionen.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0iY3f_zNcvEjeZ6inHVnOK]. In: Open Password Nr. 805 vom 14.08.2020 (H.-C. Hobohm) [Unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzE0MywiOGI3NjZkZmNkZjQ1IiwwLDAsMTMxLDFd].

0.09278763 = product of:
  0.18557526 = sum of:
    0.18557526 = sum of:
      0.10366271 = weight(_text_:t in 5629) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.10366271 = score(doc=5629,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19847474 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05038186 = queryNorm
          0.5222967 = fieldWeight in 5629, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5629)
      0.081912555 = weight(_text_:22 in 5629) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.081912555 = score(doc=5629,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17642869 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05038186 = queryNorm
          0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5629, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5629)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Vgl.: https://www.b-i-t-online.de/heft/2019-02-index.php.

Source

B.I.T.online. 22(2019) H.2, S.163-166

0.07732303 = product of:
  0.15464605 = sum of:
    0.15464605 = sum of:
      0.086385585 = weight(_text_:t in 2991) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.086385585 = score(doc=2991,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19847474 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05038186 = queryNorm
          0.43524727 = fieldWeight in 2991, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2991)
      0.06826047 = weight(_text_:22 in 2991) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06826047 = score(doc=2991,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17642869 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05038186 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2991, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2991)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

6. 6.2016 18:42:22

0.071608745 = sum of:
  0.050012346 = product of:
    0.20004939 = sum of:
      0.20004939 = weight(_text_:3a in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.20004939 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.42713797 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05038186 = queryNorm
          0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.021596396 = product of:
    0.043192793 = sum of:
      0.043192793 = weight(_text_:t in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.043192793 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19847474 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05038186 = queryNorm
          0.21762364 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

Vgl. unter: https://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwizweHljdbcAhVS16QKHXcFD9QQFjABegQICRAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Fpublication%2F271200105_Die_Autonomie_des_Menschen_und_der_Maschine_-_gegenwartige_Definitionen_von_Autonomie_zwischen_philosophischem_Hintergrund_und_technologischer_Umsetzbarkeit_Redigierte_Version_der_Magisterarbeit_Karls&usg=AOvVaw06orrdJmFF2xbCCp_hL26q.

0.061503947 = sum of:
  0.044438828 = product of:
    0.17775531 = sum of:
      0.17775531 = weight(_text_:author's in 5491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.17775531 = score(doc=5491,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.33857384 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05038186 = queryNorm
          0.52501196 = fieldWeight in 5491, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5491)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.017065117 = product of:
    0.034130234 = sum of:
      0.034130234 = weight(_text_:22 in 5491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.034130234 = score(doc=5491,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17642869 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05038186 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5491, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5491)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

RDS are usually cross-disciplinary, centralised services, which are increasingly provided at a university by the academic library and in collaboration with other RDM stakeholders, such as the Research Office. At research-intensive universities, research data is generated in a wide range of disciplines and sub-disciplines. This paper will discuss how providing discipline-specific RDM support is approached by such universities and academic libraries, and the advantages and disadvantages of these central and discipline-specific approaches. A descriptive case study on the author's experiences of collaborating with a central RDS at the University of Cambridge, as a subject librarian embedded in an academic department, is a major component of this paper. The case study describes how centralised RDM services offered by the Office of Scholarly Communication (OSC) have been adapted to meet discipline-specific needs in the Department of Chemistry. It will introduce the department and the OSC, and describe the author's role in delivering RDM training, as well as the Data Champions programme, and their membership of the RDM Project Group. It will describe the outcomes of this collaboration for the Department of Chemistry, and for the centralised service. Centralised and discipline-specific approaches to RDS provision have their own advantages and disadvantages. Supporting the discipline-specific RDM needs of researchers is proving particularly challenging for universities to address sustainably: it requires adequate financial resources and staff skilled (or re-skilled) in RDM. A mixed approach is the most desirable, cost-effective way of providing RDS, but this still has constraints.

Date

7. 9.2019 21:30:22

0.06001481 = product of:
  0.12002962 = sum of:
    0.12002962 = product of:
      0.48011848 = sum of:
        0.48011848 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.48011848 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.42713797 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05038186 = queryNorm
            1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.

0.058185734 = sum of:
  0.037707597 = product of:
    0.15083039 = sum of:
      0.15083039 = weight(_text_:author's in 2360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.15083039 = score(doc=2360,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.33857384 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05038186 = queryNorm
          0.44548744 = fieldWeight in 2360, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2360)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.020478139 = product of:
    0.040956277 = sum of:
      0.040956277 = weight(_text_:22 in 2360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.040956277 = score(doc=2360,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17642869 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05038186 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2360, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2360)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This article reports the author's recent research in developing a holistic model for various levels of digital library (DL) evaluation in which perceived important criteria from heterogeneous stakeholder groups are organized and presented. To develop such a model, the author applied a three-stage research approach: exploration, confirmation, and verification. During the exploration stage, a literature review was conducted followed by an interview, along with a card sorting technique, to collect important criteria perceived by DL experts. Then the criteria identified were used for developing an online survey during the confirmation stage. Survey respondents (431 in total) from 22 countries rated the importance of the criteria. A holistic DL evaluation model was constructed using statistical techniques. Eventually, the verification stage was devised to test the reliability of the model in the context of searching and evaluating an operational DL. The proposed model fills two lacunae in the DL domain: (a) the lack of a comprehensive and flexible framework to guide and benchmark evaluations, and (b) the uncertainty about what divergence exists among heterogeneous DL stakeholders, including general users.

0.058185734 = sum of:
  0.037707597 = product of:
    0.15083039 = sum of:
      0.15083039 = weight(_text_:author's in 4359) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.15083039 = score(doc=4359,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.33857384 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05038186 = queryNorm
          0.44548744 = fieldWeight in 4359, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4359)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.020478139 = product of:
    0.040956277 = sum of:
      0.040956277 = weight(_text_:22 in 4359) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.040956277 = score(doc=4359,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17642869 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05038186 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4359, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4359)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

A recent study in information science (IS), raises important issues concerning the value of human indexing and basic theories of indexing and information retrieval, as well as the use of quantitative and qualitative approaches in IS and the underlying theories of knowledge informing the field. The present article uses L&E as the point of departure for demonstrating in what way more social and interpretative understandings may provide fruitful improvements for research in indexing, knowledge organization, and information retrieval. The artcle is motivated by the observation that philosophical contributions tend to be ignored in IS if they are not directly formed as criticisms or invitations to dialogs. It is part of the author's ongoing publication of articles about philosophical issues in IS and it is intended to be followed by analyzes of other examples of contributions to core issues in IS. Although it is formulated as a criticism of a specific paper, it should be seen as part of a general discussion of the philosophical foundation of IS and as a support to the emerging social paradigm in this field.

Date

17. 3.2011 19:22:55

0.057128437 = product of:
  0.114256874 = sum of:
    0.114256874 = sum of:
      0.0733006 = weight(_text_:t in 4583) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0733006 = score(doc=4583,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.19847474 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05038186 = queryNorm
          0.36931956 = fieldWeight in 4583, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4583)
      0.040956277 = weight(_text_:22 in 4583) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.040956277 = score(doc=4583,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17642869 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05038186 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4583, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4583)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Vgl.: http://www.information-philosophie.de/?a=1&t=7815&n=2#.

Source

Information Philosophie. 2014/2 (2014), S.22-27

0.054126114 = product of:
  0.10825223 = sum of:
    0.10825223 = sum of:
      0.060469907 = weight(_text_:t in 765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.060469907 = score(doc=765,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19847474 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05038186 = queryNorm
          0.30467308 = fieldWeight in 765, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=765)
      0.047782324 = weight(_text_:22 in 765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.047782324 = score(doc=765,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17642869 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05038186 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 765, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=765)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Vgl.: https://www.b-i-t-online.de/heft/2019-05-index.php.

Source

B.I.T.online. 22(2019) H.5, S.397-404

0.054126114 = product of:
  0.10825223 = sum of:
    0.10825223 = sum of:
      0.060469907 = weight(_text_:t in 162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.060469907 = score(doc=162,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19847474 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05038186 = queryNorm
          0.30467308 = fieldWeight in 162, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=162)
      0.047782324 = weight(_text_:22 in 162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.047782324 = score(doc=162,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17642869 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05038186 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 162, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=162)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

¬Die Kraft der digitalen Unordnung: 32. Arbeits- und Fortbildungstagung der ASpB e. V., Sektion 5 im Deutschen Bibliotheksverband, 22.-25. September 2009 in der Universität Karlsruhe. Hrsg: Jadwiga Warmbrunn u.a

0.054126114 = product of:
  0.10825223 = sum of:
    0.10825223 = sum of:
      0.060469907 = weight(_text_:t in 5244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.060469907 = score(doc=5244,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19847474 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05038186 = queryNorm
          0.30467308 = fieldWeight in 5244, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5244)
      0.047782324 = weight(_text_:22 in 5244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.047782324 = score(doc=5244,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17642869 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05038186 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5244, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5244)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Vgl. auch: Dörner, S.:"CDU-Zerstörer" Rezo: Es kamen "Diskreditierung, Lügen, Trump-Wordings und keine inhaltliche Auseinandersetzung" [22. Mai 2019]. Interview mit Rezo. Unter: https://www.heise.de/tp/features/CDU-Zerstoerer-Rezo-Es-kamen-Diskreditierung-Luegen-Trump-Wordings-und-keine-inhaltliche-4428522.html?view=print [http://www.heise.de/-4428522].

0.054126114 = product of:
  0.10825223 = sum of:
    0.10825223 = sum of:
      0.060469907 = weight(_text_:t in 5630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.060469907 = score(doc=5630,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19847474 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05038186 = queryNorm
          0.30467308 = fieldWeight in 5630, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5630)
      0.047782324 = weight(_text_:22 in 5630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.047782324 = score(doc=5630,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17642869 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05038186 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5630, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5630)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Vgl.: https://www.b-i-t-online.de/heft/2017-01-index.php.

Source

B.I.T.online. 20(2017) H.1, S.22-25

0.046393815 = product of:
  0.09278763 = sum of:
    0.09278763 = sum of:
      0.051831353 = weight(_text_:t in 3693) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.051831353 = score(doc=3693,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19847474 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05038186 = queryNorm
          0.26114836 = fieldWeight in 3693, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3693)
      0.040956277 = weight(_text_:22 in 3693) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.040956277 = score(doc=3693,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17642869 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05038186 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3693, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3693)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Generally, Computer Science (CS) classifications are inconsistent in taxonomy strategies. t is necessary to develop CS taxonomy research to combine its historical perspective, its current knowledge and its predicted future trends - including all breakthroughs in information and communication technology. In this paper we have analyzed the ACM Computing Classification System (CCS) by means of visualization maps. The important achievement of current work is an effective visualization of classified documents from the ACM Digital Library. From the technical point of view, the innovation lies in the parallel use of analysis units: (sub)classes and keywords as well as a spherical 3D information surface. We have compared both the thematic and semantic maps of classified documents and results presented in Table 1. Furthermore, the proposed new method is used for content-related evaluation of the original scheme. Summing up: we improved an original ACM classification in the Computer Science domain by means of visualization.

Date

22. 7.2010 19:36:46

0.046393815 = product of:
  0.09278763 = sum of:
    0.09278763 = sum of:
      0.051831353 = weight(_text_:t in 3737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.051831353 = score(doc=3737,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19847474 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05038186 = queryNorm
          0.26114836 = fieldWeight in 3737, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3737)
      0.040956277 = weight(_text_:22 in 3737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.040956277 = score(doc=3737,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17642869 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05038186 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3737, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3737)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly

0.046393815 = product of:
  0.09278763 = sum of:
    0.09278763 = sum of:
      0.051831353 = weight(_text_:t in 4408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.051831353 = score(doc=4408,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19847474 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05038186 = queryNorm
          0.26114836 = fieldWeight in 4408, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4408)
      0.040956277 = weight(_text_:22 in 4408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.040956277 = score(doc=4408,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17642869 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05038186 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4408, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4408)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Pages

22 S

0.046393815 = product of:
  0.09278763 = sum of:
    0.09278763 = sum of:
      0.051831353 = weight(_text_:t in 4560) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.051831353 = score(doc=4560,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19847474 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05038186 = queryNorm
          0.26114836 = fieldWeight in 4560, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4560)
      0.040956277 = weight(_text_:22 in 4560) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.040956277 = score(doc=4560,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17642869 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05038186 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4560, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4560)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

13. 7.2011 14:47:22

0.046393815 = product of:
  0.09278763 = sum of:
    0.09278763 = sum of:
      0.051831353 = weight(_text_:t in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.051831353 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19847474 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05038186 = queryNorm
          0.26114836 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
      0.040956277 = weight(_text_:22 in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.040956277 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17642869 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05038186 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 7.2012 19:35:26

Footnote

Besteht aus 4 Teilen: Teil 1: Eden, D., A. Arndt, A. Hoffer, T. Raschke u. P. Schön: Die Nachrichten für Dokumentation in den Jahren 1950 bis 1962 (S.159-163). Teil 2: Brose, M., E. durst, D. Nitzsche, D. Veckenstedt u. R. Wein: Statistische Untersuchung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) 1963-1975 (S.164-170). Teil 3: Bösel, J., G. Ebert, P. Garz,, M. Iwanow u. B. Russ: Methoden und Ergebnisse einer statistischen Auswertung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) 1976 bis 1988 (S.171-174). Teil 4: Engelage, H., S. Jansen, R. Mertins, K. Redel u. S. Ring: Statistische Untersuchung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) / "Information. Wissenschaft & Praxis" (IWP) 1989-2011 (S.164-170).

0.046393815 = product of:
  0.09278763 = sum of:
    0.09278763 = sum of:
      0.051831353 = weight(_text_:t in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.051831353 = score(doc=1352,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19847474 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05038186 = queryNorm
          0.26114836 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
      0.040956277 = weight(_text_:22 in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.040956277 = score(doc=1352,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17642869 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05038186 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 8.2014 17:11:29