Search (681 results, page 1 of 35)

  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Eschenfelder, K.R.; Johnson, A.: Managing the data commons : controlled sharing of scholarly data (2014) 0.12 
    0.116667874 = product of:
  0.23333575 = sum of:
    0.23333575 = sum of:
      0.19458197 = weight(_text_:k.r in 1341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.19458197 = score(doc=1341,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.3740736 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.84674 = idf(docFreq=46, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047672488 = queryNorm
          0.5201703 = fieldWeight in 1341, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            7.84674 = idf(docFreq=46, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1341)
      0.03875378 = weight(_text_:22 in 1341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03875378 = score(doc=1341,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16694093 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047672488 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1341, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1341)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 8.2014 16:56:41
  2. Castle, C.: Getting the central RDM message across : a case study of central versus discipline-specific Research Data Services (RDS) at the University of Cambridge (2019) 0.06 
    0.058196463 = sum of:
  0.042049054 = product of:
    0.16819622 = sum of:
      0.16819622 = weight(_text_:author's in 5491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.16819622 = score(doc=5491,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.32036644 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047672488 = queryNorm
          0.52501196 = fieldWeight in 5491, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5491)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.01614741 = product of:
    0.03229482 = sum of:
      0.03229482 = weight(_text_:22 in 5491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03229482 = score(doc=5491,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16694093 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047672488 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5491, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5491)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    RDS are usually cross-disciplinary, centralised services, which are increasingly provided at a university by the academic library and in collaboration with other RDM stakeholders, such as the Research Office. At research-intensive universities, research data is generated in a wide range of disciplines and sub-disciplines. This paper will discuss how providing discipline-specific RDM support is approached by such universities and academic libraries, and the advantages and disadvantages of these central and discipline-specific approaches. A descriptive case study on the author's experiences of collaborating with a central RDS at the University of Cambridge, as a subject librarian embedded in an academic department, is a major component of this paper. The case study describes how centralised RDM services offered by the Office of Scholarly Communication (OSC) have been adapted to meet discipline-specific needs in the Department of Chemistry. It will introduce the department and the OSC, and describe the author's role in delivering RDM training, as well as the Data Champions programme, and their membership of the RDM Project Group. It will describe the outcomes of this collaboration for the Department of Chemistry, and for the centralised service. Centralised and discipline-specific approaches to RDS provision have their own advantages and disadvantages. Supporting the discipline-specific RDM needs of researchers is proving particularly challenging for universities to address sustainably: it requires adequate financial resources and staff skilled (or re-skilled) in RDM. A mixed approach is the most desirable, cost-effective way of providing RDS, but this still has constraints.
    Date
    7. 9.2019 21:30:22
  3. Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011) 0.06 
    0.056787413 = product of:
  0.113574825 = sum of:
    0.113574825 = product of:
      0.4542993 = sum of:
        0.4542993 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.4542993 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4041679 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047672488 = queryNorm
            1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
  4. Billey, A.; Drabinski, E.; Roberto, K.R.: What's gender got to do with It? : a critique of RDA 9.7 (2014) 0.06 
    0.05675307 = product of:
  0.11350614 = sum of:
    0.11350614 = product of:
      0.22701228 = sum of:
        0.22701228 = weight(_text_:k.r in 1977) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22701228 = score(doc=1977,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3740736 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.84674 = idf(docFreq=46, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047672488 = queryNorm
            0.6068653 = fieldWeight in 1977, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.84674 = idf(docFreq=46, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1977)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  5. Zhang, Y.: Developing a holistic model for digital library evaluation (2010) 0.06 
    0.0550567 = sum of:
  0.035679806 = product of:
    0.14271922 = sum of:
      0.14271922 = weight(_text_:author's in 2360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.14271922 = score(doc=2360,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.32036644 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047672488 = queryNorm
          0.44548744 = fieldWeight in 2360, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2360)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.01937689 = product of:
    0.03875378 = sum of:
      0.03875378 = weight(_text_:22 in 2360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03875378 = score(doc=2360,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16694093 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047672488 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2360, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2360)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This article reports the author's recent research in developing a holistic model for various levels of digital library (DL) evaluation in which perceived important criteria from heterogeneous stakeholder groups are organized and presented. To develop such a model, the author applied a three-stage research approach: exploration, confirmation, and verification. During the exploration stage, a literature review was conducted followed by an interview, along with a card sorting technique, to collect important criteria perceived by DL experts. Then the criteria identified were used for developing an online survey during the confirmation stage. Survey respondents (431 in total) from 22 countries rated the importance of the criteria. A holistic DL evaluation model was constructed using statistical techniques. Eventually, the verification stage was devised to test the reliability of the model in the context of searching and evaluating an operational DL. The proposed model fills two lacunae in the DL domain: (a) the lack of a comprehensive and flexible framework to guide and benchmark evaluations, and (b) the uncertainty about what divergence exists among heterogeneous DL stakeholders, including general users.
  6. Hjoerland, B.: ¬The importance of theories of knowledge : indexing and information retrieval as an example (2011) 0.06 
    0.0550567 = sum of:
  0.035679806 = product of:
    0.14271922 = sum of:
      0.14271922 = weight(_text_:author's in 4359) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.14271922 = score(doc=4359,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.32036644 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047672488 = queryNorm
          0.44548744 = fieldWeight in 4359, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4359)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.01937689 = product of:
    0.03875378 = sum of:
      0.03875378 = weight(_text_:22 in 4359) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03875378 = score(doc=4359,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16694093 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047672488 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4359, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4359)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    A recent study in information science (IS), raises important issues concerning the value of human indexing and basic theories of indexing and information retrieval, as well as the use of quantitative and qualitative approaches in IS and the underlying theories of knowledge informing the field. The present article uses L&E as the point of departure for demonstrating in what way more social and interpretative understandings may provide fruitful improvements for research in indexing, knowledge organization, and information retrieval. The artcle is motivated by the observation that philosophical contributions tend to be ignored in IS if they are not directly formed as criticisms or invitations to dialogs. It is part of the author's ongoing publication of articles about philosophical issues in IS and it is intended to be followed by analyzes of other examples of contributions to core issues in IS. Although it is formulated as a criticism of a specific paper, it should be seen as part of a general discussion of the philosophical foundation of IS and as a support to the emerging social paradigm in this field.
    Date
    17. 3.2011 19:22:55
  7. Cheng, A.-S.; Fleischmann, K.R.; Wang, P.; Ishita, E.; Oard, D.W.: ¬The role of innovation and wealth in the net neutrality debate : a content analysis of human values in congressional and FCC hearings (2012) 0.05 
    0.048645493 = product of:
  0.097290985 = sum of:
    0.097290985 = product of:
      0.19458197 = sum of:
        0.19458197 = weight(_text_:k.r in 276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19458197 = score(doc=276,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3740736 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.84674 = idf(docFreq=46, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047672488 = queryNorm
            0.5201703 = fieldWeight in 276, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.84674 = idf(docFreq=46, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=276)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  8. Weissenberger, L.K.; Budd, J.M.; Herold, K.R.: Epistemology beyond the brain (2018) 0.05 
    0.048645493 = product of:
  0.097290985 = sum of:
    0.097290985 = product of:
      0.19458197 = sum of:
        0.19458197 = weight(_text_:k.r in 4224) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19458197 = score(doc=4224,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3740736 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.84674 = idf(docFreq=46, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047672488 = queryNorm
            0.5201703 = fieldWeight in 4224, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.84674 = idf(docFreq=46, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4224)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  9. Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014) 0.05 
    0.047322843 = product of:
  0.09464569 = sum of:
    0.09464569 = product of:
      0.37858275 = sum of:
        0.37858275 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.37858275 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4041679 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047672488 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
  10. McKeown, K.; Daume III, H.; Chaturvedi, S.; Paparrizos, J.; Thadani, K.; Barrio, P.; Biran, O.; Bothe, S.; Collins, M.; Fleischmann, K.R.; Gravano, L.; Jha, R.; King, B.; McInerney, K.; Moon, T.; Neelakantan, A.; O'Seaghdha, D.; Radev, D.; Templeton, C.; Teufel, S.: Predicting the impact of scientific concepts using full-text features (2016) 0.04 
    0.04053791 = product of:
  0.08107582 = sum of:
    0.08107582 = product of:
      0.16215163 = sum of:
        0.16215163 = weight(_text_:k.r in 3153) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16215163 = score(doc=3153,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3740736 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.84674 = idf(docFreq=46, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047672488 = queryNorm
            0.43347523 = fieldWeight in 3153, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.84674 = idf(docFreq=46, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3153)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  11. Fleischmann, K.R.; Hui, C.; Wallace, W.A.: ¬The societal responsibilities of computational modelers : human values and professional codes of ethics (2017) 0.04 
    0.04053791 = product of:
  0.08107582 = sum of:
    0.08107582 = product of:
      0.16215163 = sum of:
        0.16215163 = weight(_text_:k.r in 3424) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16215163 = score(doc=3424,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3740736 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.84674 = idf(docFreq=46, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047672488 = queryNorm
            0.43347523 = fieldWeight in 3424, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.84674 = idf(docFreq=46, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3424)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  12. Gödert, W.; Lepsky, K.: Informationelle Kompetenz : ein humanistischer Entwurf (2019) 0.03 
    0.033125993 = product of:
  0.066251986 = sum of:
    0.066251986 = product of:
      0.26500794 = sum of:
        0.26500794 = weight(_text_:3a in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.26500794 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4041679 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047672488 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Philosophisch-ethische Rezensionen vom 09.11.2019 (Jürgen Czogalla), Unter: https://philosophisch-ethische-rezensionen.de/rezension/Goedert1.html. In: B.I.T. online 23(2020) H.3, S.345-347 (W. Sühl-Strohmenger) [Unter: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.b-i-t-online.de%2Fheft%2F2020-03-rezensionen.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0iY3f_zNcvEjeZ6inHVnOK]. In: Open Password Nr. 805 vom 14.08.2020 (H.-C. Hobohm) [Unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzE0MywiOGI3NjZkZmNkZjQ1IiwwLDAsMTMxLDFd].
  13. Widmaier, K.: Ich-Bewusstsein und menschlicher Geist : die Person und der Einfluss der Kultur (2017) 0.03 
    0.03243033 = product of:
  0.06486066 = sum of:
    0.06486066 = product of:
      0.12972131 = sum of:
        0.12972131 = weight(_text_:k.r in 5754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12972131 = score(doc=5754,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3740736 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.84674 = idf(docFreq=46, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047672488 = queryNorm
            0.34678018 = fieldWeight in 5754, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.84674 = idf(docFreq=46, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5754)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Enthält Verbindungen zwischen den Aussagen von Popper, Donald und Fromm die sich gut mit dem Konzept der Institutionellen Realität von Searle verbinden lassen; z.B.: "6.5 Ich-Bewusstsein und Kultur Aufgrund sprachwissenschaftlicher Überlegungen schließt Karl R. Popper, dass wir nicht als Ich' geboren werden, sondern dass wir lernen, ein 'Ich zu sein.<127: Popper/Eccles: Das Ich und sein Gehirn, Teil 1, Kap. P4, Abschn. 31> Das 'Ich' wird seiner Meinung nach durch soziale Erfahrugen, aber auch mittela aktiver Gegstaltung, wie z.B. durch Entwicklen von Vorlieben und individuellen Verhaltensweisen, erworben. "Ih behaupte also, dass nicht nur Wahrnehmung und Sprache - aktiv - erlernt werden müssen, sondern auch noch die Aufgabe eine Perosn zu sein; und ich behaupte ferner, dass das nicht nur einen engen Kontakt mit der Welt 2 anderer Personen, sondern auch einen engen Kontakt mit der Welt 3 der Sprache und Theorien [...] einschließt."<128: Popper/Eccles: Das Ich und sein Gehirn, Teil 1, Kap. P4, Abschn. 31, S.147> Ähnliche Aussagen wie bei K.R. Popper finden sich bei Merlin Donald: "Unsere Identität bildet sich somit nach Maßgabe der Kultur heraus und ist weitgehend von kulturell vorgegebenen Vorstellungen beeinflusst." <129: Donald: Triumph des Bewusstseins, Kap. 6, S.281> Und weiter: "Die Strukturen, die sich auf der Ebene der Kultur herausbilden, sind nicht nur real, sondern prägen auch unser kognitives Universum, das definiert, was für uns 'Realität' ist."<130: Donald: Triumph des Bewusstseins, Kap. 6, S.281>. Aus der Sicht des Psychoanalytikers Erich Fromm besteht ein enger Zusammenhag zwischen der Kultur und dem persönlichen Unbewussten ihrer Mitglieder. "Wir kommen also zu dem Schluß, daß es sozial bedingt ist, ob etwas bewußt oder unbewußt ist. Ich bin mir all meiner Gefühle und Gedanken bewußt, die den dreifachen Filter der (sozial bedingten) Sprache, der Logik und der Tabus (sozialer Charakter) passieren dürfen. Einpfindungen, die nicht durch den Filter gehen, bleiben außerhalb des Bewußtseins; das heiß, sie bleiben unbewußt."<131: Fromm: Psychoanalyse und Zen-Buddhismus, IV Bewusstsein, Verdrängugn und Aufhebung der Verdrängung, S.134>" (S.67)
  14. Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019) 0.03 
    0.028393706 = product of:
  0.056787413 = sum of:
    0.056787413 = product of:
      0.22714965 = sum of:
        0.22714965 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22714965 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4041679 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047672488 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
  15. Suchenwirth, L.: Sacherschliessung in Zeiten von Corona : neue Herausforderungen und Chancen (2019) 0.03 
    0.028393706 = product of:
  0.056787413 = sum of:
    0.056787413 = product of:
      0.22714965 = sum of:
        0.22714965 = weight(_text_:3a in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22714965 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4041679 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047672488 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    https%3A%2F%2Fjournals.univie.ac.at%2Findex.php%2Fvoebm%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F5332%2F5271%2F&usg=AOvVaw2yQdFGHlmOwVls7ANCpTii.
  16. (2013 ff.) 0.03 
    0.025835855 = product of:
  0.05167171 = sum of:
    0.05167171 = product of:
      0.10334342 = sum of:
        0.10334342 = weight(_text_:22 in 2851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10334342 = score(doc=2851,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16694093 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047672488 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2851, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2851)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  17. Ahlgren, P.; Järvelin, K.: Measuring impact of twelve information scientists using the DCI index (2010) 0.03 
    0.025229432 = product of:
  0.050458863 = sum of:
    0.050458863 = product of:
      0.20183545 = sum of:
        0.20183545 = weight(_text_:author's in 3593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20183545 = score(doc=3593,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.32036644 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047672488 = queryNorm
            0.63001436 = fieldWeight in 3593, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3593)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The Discounted Cumulated Impact (DCI) index has recently been proposed for research evaluation. In the present work an earlier dataset by Cronin and Meho (2007) is reanalyzed, with the aim of exemplifying the salient features of the DCI index. We apply the index on, and compare our results to, the outcomes of the Cronin-Meho (2007) study. Both authors and their top publications are used as units of analysis, which suggests that, by adjusting the parameters of evaluation according to the needs of research evaluation, the DCI index delivers data on an author's (or publication's) lifetime impact or current impact at the time of evaluation on an author's (or publication's) capability of inviting citations from highly cited later publications as an indication of impact, and on the relative impact across a set of authors (or publications) over their lifetime or currently.
  18. Danell, R.: Can the quality of scientific work be predicted using information on the author's track record? (2011) 0.03 
    0.025229432 = product of:
  0.050458863 = sum of:
    0.050458863 = product of:
      0.20183545 = sum of:
        0.20183545 = weight(_text_:author's in 4131) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20183545 = score(doc=4131,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.32036644 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047672488 = queryNorm
            0.63001436 = fieldWeight in 4131, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4131)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Many countries are moving towards research policies that emphasize excellence; consequently; they develop evaluation systems to identify universities, research groups, and researchers that can be said to be "excellent." Such active research policy strategies, in which evaluations are used to concentrate resources, are based on an unsubstantiated assumption that researchers' track records are indicative of their future research performance. In this study, information on authors' track records (previous publication volume and previous citation rate) is used to predict the impact of their articles. The study concludes that, to a certain degree, the impact of scientific work can be predicted using information on how often an author's previous publications have been cited. The relationship between past performance and the citation rate of articles is strongest at the high end of the citation distribution. The implications of these results are discussed in the context of a cumulative advantage process.
  19. Budd, J.M.: ¬A reply to Lingard (2013) 0.03 
    0.025229432 = product of:
  0.050458863 = sum of:
    0.050458863 = product of:
      0.20183545 = sum of:
        0.20183545 = weight(_text_:author's in 1762) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20183545 = score(doc=1762,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.32036644 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047672488 = queryNorm
            0.63001436 = fieldWeight in 1762, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1762)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of the paper is to provide a critical reply to Robert Lingard's close reading of a previously published paper of the present author's, "Meaning, truth, and information." Design/methodology/approach - The approach adopted in this paper is an examination of Lingard's argument and counter-points, employing (primarily) logical and rhetorical analysis of his claims. Findings - While some of Lingard's criticisms are legitimate and must be admitted, many have to be subjected to rebuttal on the basis of misreading, logical error, and discursive misapprehension of points made in the original article. Originality/value - Since the present paper is a reply to another author's work, originality is constrained by the arguments and claims made by that author. That said, additional analysis is added to the matters of meaning, truth, and information in an effort to clarify and expand upon the essence of the original article.
  20. Koppel, M.; Schweitzer, N.: Measuring direct and indirect authorial influence in historical corpora (2014) 0.02 
    0.023786537 = product of:
  0.047573075 = sum of:
    0.047573075 = product of:
      0.1902923 = sum of:
        0.1902923 = weight(_text_:author's in 1506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1902923 = score(doc=1506,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.32036644 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047672488 = queryNorm
            0.59398323 = fieldWeight in 1506, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1506)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    We show how automatically extracted citations in historical corpora can be used to measure the direct and indirect influence of authors on each other. These measures can in turn be used to determine an author's overall prominence in the corpus and to identify distinct schools of thought. We apply our methods to two major historical corpora. Using scholarly consensus as a gold standard, we demonstrate empirically the superiority of indirect influence over direct influence as a basis for various measures of authorial impact.

Authors

Languages

  • e 494
  • d 179
  • a 1
  • hu 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 593
  • el 59
  • m 45
  • s 15
  • x 12
  • r 7
  • b 5
  • ag 1
  • i 1
  • z 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications