Search (697 results, page 1 of 35)

  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Maurer, M.B.; Shakeri, S.: Disciplinary differences : LCSH and keyword assignment for ETDs from different disciplines (2016) 0.12
    0.11540075 = product of:
      0.2308015 = sum of:
        0.2308015 = sum of:
          0.18495387 = weight(_text_:m.b in 5122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.18495387 = score(doc=5122,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.34001032 = queryWeight, product of:
                7.033448 = idf(docFreq=105, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04834191 = queryNorm
              0.54396546 = fieldWeight in 5122, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                7.033448 = idf(docFreq=105, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5122)
          0.04584763 = weight(_text_:22 in 5122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04584763 = score(doc=5122,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16928513 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04834191 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5122, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5122)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    17. 3.2019 18:04:22
  2. Erickson, L.B.; Wisniewski, P.; Xu, H.; Carroll, J.M.; Rosson, M.B.; Perkins, D.F.: ¬The boundaries between : parental involvement in a teen's online world (2016) 0.10
    0.098914936 = product of:
      0.19782987 = sum of:
        0.19782987 = sum of:
          0.1585319 = weight(_text_:m.b in 2932) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.1585319 = score(doc=2932,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.34001032 = queryWeight, product of:
                7.033448 = idf(docFreq=105, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04834191 = queryNorm
              0.46625614 = fieldWeight in 2932, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                7.033448 = idf(docFreq=105, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2932)
          0.03929797 = weight(_text_:22 in 2932) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03929797 = score(doc=2932,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16928513 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04834191 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2932, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2932)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    7. 5.2016 20:05:22
  3. Nichols, D.M.; Twidale, M.B.: Recommendation, collaboration and social search (2011) 0.09
    0.092476934 = product of:
      0.18495387 = sum of:
        0.18495387 = product of:
          0.36990774 = sum of:
            0.36990774 = weight(_text_:m.b in 552) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.36990774 = score(doc=552,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.34001032 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.033448 = idf(docFreq=105, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04834191 = queryNorm
                1.0879309 = fieldWeight in 552, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.033448 = idf(docFreq=105, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=552)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  4. Castle, C.: Getting the central RDM message across : a case study of central versus discipline-specific Research Data Services (RDS) at the University of Cambridge (2019) 0.06
    0.059013665 = sum of:
      0.04263951 = product of:
        0.17055804 = sum of:
          0.17055804 = weight(_text_:author's in 5491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.17055804 = score(doc=5491,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.32486504 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04834191 = queryNorm
              0.52501196 = fieldWeight in 5491, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5491)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.016374154 = product of:
        0.032748308 = sum of:
          0.032748308 = weight(_text_:22 in 5491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.032748308 = score(doc=5491,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16928513 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04834191 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5491, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5491)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    RDS are usually cross-disciplinary, centralised services, which are increasingly provided at a university by the academic library and in collaboration with other RDM stakeholders, such as the Research Office. At research-intensive universities, research data is generated in a wide range of disciplines and sub-disciplines. This paper will discuss how providing discipline-specific RDM support is approached by such universities and academic libraries, and the advantages and disadvantages of these central and discipline-specific approaches. A descriptive case study on the author's experiences of collaborating with a central RDS at the University of Cambridge, as a subject librarian embedded in an academic department, is a major component of this paper. The case study describes how centralised RDM services offered by the Office of Scholarly Communication (OSC) have been adapted to meet discipline-specific needs in the Department of Chemistry. It will introduce the department and the OSC, and describe the author's role in delivering RDM training, as well as the Data Champions programme, and their membership of the RDM Project Group. It will describe the outcomes of this collaboration for the Department of Chemistry, and for the centralised service. Centralised and discipline-specific approaches to RDS provision have their own advantages and disadvantages. Supporting the discipline-specific RDM needs of researchers is proving particularly challenging for universities to address sustainably: it requires adequate financial resources and staff skilled (or re-skilled) in RDM. A mixed approach is the most desirable, cost-effective way of providing RDS, but this still has constraints.
    Date
    7. 9.2019 21:30:22
  5. Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011) 0.06
    0.057584826 = product of:
      0.11516965 = sum of:
        0.11516965 = product of:
          0.4606786 = sum of:
            0.4606786 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.4606786 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.40984327 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04834191 = queryNorm
                1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
  6. Zhang, Y.: Developing a holistic model for digital library evaluation (2010) 0.06
    0.055829808 = sum of:
      0.036180824 = product of:
        0.1447233 = sum of:
          0.1447233 = weight(_text_:author's in 2360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.1447233 = score(doc=2360,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.32486504 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04834191 = queryNorm
              0.44548744 = fieldWeight in 2360, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2360)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.019648984 = product of:
        0.03929797 = sum of:
          0.03929797 = weight(_text_:22 in 2360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03929797 = score(doc=2360,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16928513 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04834191 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2360, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2360)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This article reports the author's recent research in developing a holistic model for various levels of digital library (DL) evaluation in which perceived important criteria from heterogeneous stakeholder groups are organized and presented. To develop such a model, the author applied a three-stage research approach: exploration, confirmation, and verification. During the exploration stage, a literature review was conducted followed by an interview, along with a card sorting technique, to collect important criteria perceived by DL experts. Then the criteria identified were used for developing an online survey during the confirmation stage. Survey respondents (431 in total) from 22 countries rated the importance of the criteria. A holistic DL evaluation model was constructed using statistical techniques. Eventually, the verification stage was devised to test the reliability of the model in the context of searching and evaluating an operational DL. The proposed model fills two lacunae in the DL domain: (a) the lack of a comprehensive and flexible framework to guide and benchmark evaluations, and (b) the uncertainty about what divergence exists among heterogeneous DL stakeholders, including general users.
  7. Hjoerland, B.: ¬The importance of theories of knowledge : indexing and information retrieval as an example (2011) 0.06
    0.055829808 = sum of:
      0.036180824 = product of:
        0.1447233 = sum of:
          0.1447233 = weight(_text_:author's in 4359) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.1447233 = score(doc=4359,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.32486504 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04834191 = queryNorm
              0.44548744 = fieldWeight in 4359, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4359)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.019648984 = product of:
        0.03929797 = sum of:
          0.03929797 = weight(_text_:22 in 4359) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03929797 = score(doc=4359,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16928513 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04834191 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4359, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4359)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    A recent study in information science (IS), raises important issues concerning the value of human indexing and basic theories of indexing and information retrieval, as well as the use of quantitative and qualitative approaches in IS and the underlying theories of knowledge informing the field. The present article uses L&E as the point of departure for demonstrating in what way more social and interpretative understandings may provide fruitful improvements for research in indexing, knowledge organization, and information retrieval. The artcle is motivated by the observation that philosophical contributions tend to be ignored in IS if they are not directly formed as criticisms or invitations to dialogs. It is part of the author's ongoing publication of articles about philosophical issues in IS and it is intended to be followed by analyzes of other examples of contributions to core issues in IS. Although it is formulated as a criticism of a specific paper, it should be seen as part of a general discussion of the philosophical foundation of IS and as a support to the emerging social paradigm in this field.
    Date
    17. 3.2011 19:22:55
  8. Nichols, D.M.; Twidale, M.B.: Metrics for openness (2017) 0.05
    0.052843966 = product of:
      0.10568793 = sum of:
        0.10568793 = product of:
          0.21137586 = sum of:
            0.21137586 = weight(_text_:m.b in 3530) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.21137586 = score(doc=3530,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.34001032 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.033448 = idf(docFreq=105, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04834191 = queryNorm
                0.62167484 = fieldWeight in 3530, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.033448 = idf(docFreq=105, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3530)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  9. Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014) 0.05
    0.047987357 = product of:
      0.09597471 = sum of:
        0.09597471 = product of:
          0.38389885 = sum of:
            0.38389885 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.38389885 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.40984327 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04834191 = queryNorm
                0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
  10. Souza, R.R.; Tudhope, D.; Almeida, M.B.: ¬The KOS spectra : a tentative typology of knowledge organization systems (2010) 0.05
    0.046238467 = product of:
      0.092476934 = sum of:
        0.092476934 = product of:
          0.18495387 = sum of:
            0.18495387 = weight(_text_:m.b in 3523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.18495387 = score(doc=3523,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.34001032 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.033448 = idf(docFreq=105, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04834191 = queryNorm
                0.54396546 = fieldWeight in 3523, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.033448 = idf(docFreq=105, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3523)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  11. Souza, R.R.; Tudhope, D.; Almeida, M.B.: Towards a taxonomy of KOS (2012) 0.05
    0.046238467 = product of:
      0.092476934 = sum of:
        0.092476934 = product of:
          0.18495387 = sum of:
            0.18495387 = weight(_text_:m.b in 139) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.18495387 = score(doc=139,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.34001032 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.033448 = idf(docFreq=105, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04834191 = queryNorm
                0.54396546 = fieldWeight in 139, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.033448 = idf(docFreq=105, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=139)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  12. Maurer, M.B.; McCutcheon, S.; Schwing, T.: Who's doing what? : findability and author-supplied ETD metadata in the library catalog (2011) 0.05
    0.046238467 = product of:
      0.092476934 = sum of:
        0.092476934 = product of:
          0.18495387 = sum of:
            0.18495387 = weight(_text_:m.b in 1891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.18495387 = score(doc=1891,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.34001032 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.033448 = idf(docFreq=105, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04834191 = queryNorm
                0.54396546 = fieldWeight in 1891, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.033448 = idf(docFreq=105, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1891)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  13. Maurer, M.B.; Panchyshyn, R.S.: Understanding the why : a case study in managing the RDA implementation (2014) 0.05
    0.046238467 = product of:
      0.092476934 = sum of:
        0.092476934 = product of:
          0.18495387 = sum of:
            0.18495387 = weight(_text_:m.b in 1974) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.18495387 = score(doc=1974,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.34001032 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.033448 = idf(docFreq=105, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04834191 = queryNorm
                0.54396546 = fieldWeight in 1974, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.033448 = idf(docFreq=105, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1974)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  14. Friedländer, M.B.: Der Kanon der Informationswissenschaft (2015) 0.05
    0.046238467 = product of:
      0.092476934 = sum of:
        0.092476934 = product of:
          0.18495387 = sum of:
            0.18495387 = weight(_text_:m.b in 2079) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.18495387 = score(doc=2079,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.34001032 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.033448 = idf(docFreq=105, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04834191 = queryNorm
                0.54396546 = fieldWeight in 2079, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.033448 = idf(docFreq=105, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2079)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  15. Simões, M. da Graça; Machado, L.M.; Souza, R.R.; Almeida, M.B.; Tavares Lopes, A.: Automatic indexing and ontologies : the consistency of research chronology and authoring in the context of Information Science (2018) 0.05
    0.046238467 = product of:
      0.092476934 = sum of:
        0.092476934 = product of:
          0.18495387 = sum of:
            0.18495387 = weight(_text_:m.b in 5909) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.18495387 = score(doc=5909,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.34001032 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.033448 = idf(docFreq=105, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04834191 = queryNorm
                0.54396546 = fieldWeight in 5909, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.033448 = idf(docFreq=105, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5909)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  16. Scholl, H.J.; Eisenberg, M.B.; Dirks, L.; Carlson, T.S.: ¬The TEDS framework for assessing information systems from a human actors' perspective : Extending and repurposing Taylor's Value-Added Model (2011) 0.04
    0.039632976 = product of:
      0.07926595 = sum of:
        0.07926595 = product of:
          0.1585319 = sum of:
            0.1585319 = weight(_text_:m.b in 4369) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1585319 = score(doc=4369,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.34001032 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.033448 = idf(docFreq=105, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04834191 = queryNorm
                0.46625614 = fieldWeight in 4369, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.033448 = idf(docFreq=105, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4369)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  17. Almeida, M.B.: Revisiting ontologies : a necessary clarification (2013) 0.04
    0.039632976 = product of:
      0.07926595 = sum of:
        0.07926595 = product of:
          0.1585319 = sum of:
            0.1585319 = weight(_text_:m.b in 1010) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1585319 = score(doc=1010,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.34001032 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.033448 = idf(docFreq=105, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04834191 = queryNorm
                0.46625614 = fieldWeight in 1010, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.033448 = idf(docFreq=105, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1010)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  18. Xiao, L.; Farooq, U.; Carroll, J.M.; Rosson, M.B.: ¬The development of community members' roles in partnership research projects : an empirical study (2013) 0.04
    0.039632976 = product of:
      0.07926595 = sum of:
        0.07926595 = product of:
          0.1585319 = sum of:
            0.1585319 = weight(_text_:m.b in 1106) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1585319 = score(doc=1106,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.34001032 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.033448 = idf(docFreq=105, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04834191 = queryNorm
                0.46625614 = fieldWeight in 1106, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.033448 = idf(docFreq=105, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1106)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  19. Friedländer, M.B.: Informationswissenschaft an deutschsprachigen Universitäten : eine komparative informetrische Analyse (2014) 0.04
    0.039632976 = product of:
      0.07926595 = sum of:
        0.07926595 = product of:
          0.1585319 = sum of:
            0.1585319 = weight(_text_:m.b in 1267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1585319 = score(doc=1267,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.34001032 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.033448 = idf(docFreq=105, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04834191 = queryNorm
                0.46625614 = fieldWeight in 1267, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.033448 = idf(docFreq=105, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1267)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  20. Wichor, M.B.: Variation in number of hits for complex searches in Google Scholar (2016) 0.04
    0.039632976 = product of:
      0.07926595 = sum of:
        0.07926595 = product of:
          0.1585319 = sum of:
            0.1585319 = weight(_text_:m.b in 2909) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1585319 = score(doc=2909,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.34001032 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.033448 = idf(docFreq=105, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04834191 = queryNorm
                0.46625614 = fieldWeight in 2909, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.033448 = idf(docFreq=105, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2909)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    

Authors

Languages

  • e 508
  • d 180
  • a 1
  • hu 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 610
  • el 59
  • m 45
  • s 15
  • x 12
  • r 7
  • b 5
  • i 1
  • z 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications