Search (1242 results, page 1 of 63)

  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011) 0.20 
    0.20159277 = sum of:
  0.13474041 = product of:
    0.53896165 = sum of:
      0.53896165 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.53896165 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.47948787 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056556646 = queryNorm
          1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.06685236 = product of:
    0.13370472 = sum of:
      0.13370472 = weight(_text_:x in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.13370472 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.23882076 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056556646 = queryNorm
          0.55985385 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
    Type
    x
  2. Zhu, Q.; Kong, X.; Hong, S.; Li, J.; He, Z.: Global ontology research progress : a bibliometric analysis (2015) 0.14 
    0.13801 = sum of:
  0.028116621 = product of:
    0.112466484 = sum of:
      0.112466484 = weight(_text_:authors in 2590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.112466484 = score(doc=2590,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.25783125 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056556646 = queryNorm
          0.43620193 = fieldWeight in 2590, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2590)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.10989338 = sum of:
    0.055710305 = weight(_text_:x in 2590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.055710305 = score(doc=2590,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23882076 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
          0.056556646 = queryNorm
        0.23327245 = fieldWeight in 2590, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2590)
    0.05418308 = weight(_text_:22 in 2590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05418308 = score(doc=2590,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.19805174 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.056556646 = queryNorm
        0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2590, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2590)
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to analyse the global scientific outputs of ontology research, an important emerging discipline that has huge potential to improve information understanding, organization, and management. Design/methodology/approach - This study collected literature published during 1900-2012 from the Web of Science database. The bibliometric analysis was performed from authorial, institutional, national, spatiotemporal, and topical aspects. Basic statistical analysis, visualization of geographic distribution, co-word analysis, and a new index were applied to the selected data. Findings - Characteristics of publication outputs suggested that ontology research has entered into the soaring stage, along with increased participation and collaboration. The authors identified the leading authors, institutions, nations, and articles in ontology research. Authors were more from North America, Europe, and East Asia. The USA took the lead, while China grew fastest. Four major categories of frequently used keywords were identified: applications in Semantic Web, applications in bioinformatics, philosophy theories, and common supporting technology. Semantic Web research played a core role, and gene ontology study was well-developed. The study focus of ontology has shifted from philosophy to information science. Originality/value - This is the first study to quantify global research patterns and trends in ontology, which might provide a potential guide for the future research. The new index provides an alternative way to evaluate the multidisciplinary influence of researchers.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    17. 9.2018 18:22:23
  3. Yuan, X. (J.); Belkin, N.J.: Applying an information-seeking dialogue model in an interactive information retrieval system (2014) 0.12 
    0.12214015 = sum of:
  0.028116621 = product of:
    0.112466484 = sum of:
      0.112466484 = weight(_text_:authors in 4544) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.112466484 = score(doc=4544,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.25783125 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056556646 = queryNorm
          0.43620193 = fieldWeight in 4544, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4544)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.094023526 = sum of:
    0.055710305 = weight(_text_:x in 4544) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.055710305 = score(doc=4544,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23882076 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
          0.056556646 = queryNorm
        0.23327245 = fieldWeight in 4544, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4544)
    0.038313225 = weight(_text_:22 in 4544) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.038313225 = score(doc=4544,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19805174 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.056556646 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4544, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4544)
    Abstract
    Purpose - People often engage in different information-seeking strategies (ISSs) within a single information-seeking episode. A critical concern for the design of information retrieval (IR) systems is how to provide support for these different behaviors in a manner which searchers can easily understand, navigate and use, as they move from one ISS to another. The purpose of this paper is to describe a dialogue structure that was implemented in an experimental IR system, in order to address this concern. Design/methodology/approach - The authors conducted a user-centered experiment to evaluate the IR systems. Participants were asked to search for information on two different task types, with four different topics per task, in both the experimental system and a baseline system emulating state-of-the-art IR systems. The authors report here the results related explicitly to the use of the experimental system's dialogue structure. Findings - For one of the task types, most participants followed the search steps as predicted in the dialogue structures, and those who did so completed the task in fewer moves. For the other task type, predicted order of moves was often not followed, but participants again used fewer moves when following the predicted order. Results demonstrate that the dialogue structures the authors designed indeed support effective human information behavior patterns in a variety of ways, and that searchers can effectively use a system which changes to support different ISSs. Originality/value - This study shows that it is both possible and beneficial, to design an IR system which can support multiple ISSs, and that such a system can be understood and used successfully.
    Date
    6. 4.2015 19:22:59
  4. Lindpointner, R.: ¬Die Einführung der Dewey-Dezimalklassifikation (DDC) in der Oberösterreichischen Landesbibliothek (OÖLB) (2010) 0.11 
    0.10611843 = sum of:
  0.07269225 = product of:
    0.290769 = sum of:
      0.290769 = weight(_text_:2200 in 4378) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.290769 = score(doc=4378,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.498067 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056556646 = queryNorm
          0.583795 = fieldWeight in 4378, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4378)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.03342618 = product of:
    0.06685236 = sum of:
      0.06685236 = weight(_text_:x in 4378) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06685236 = score(doc=4378,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.23882076 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056556646 = queryNorm
          0.27992693 = fieldWeight in 4378, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4378)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Der Grund für die Einführung der DDC war die Umstellung auf Freihand durch den damals bevorstehenden Umbau und Ausbau der Bibliothek. Durch die Errichtung von 3 Tiefgeschoßen war es möglich, das gesamte oberirdische Magazin für das Publikum zu öffnen, wodurch die Publikumsflächen von vorher weniger als 200 m**2 auf nun 2200 m**2 ausgeweitet werden konnten. Zur Ausgangssituation: Wir hatten damals eine Freihand-Bibliothek im Umfang von einigen tausend Nachschlagewerken im Lesesaal, die wir einige Jahre zuvor - nach einem Umbau des Lesesaals - grob nach der 3-stelligen DDC aufgestellt hatten. Aber im Grunde genommen war das Thema Freihand für uns vollkommenes Neuland.
    Source
    ¬The Ne(x)t generation: das Angebot der Bibliotheken; 30. Österreichischer Bibliothekartag, Graz, 15.-18.9.2009. Hrsg.: Ute Bergner u. Erhard Göbel
  5. Ford, N.: Introduction to information behaviour (2015) 0.09 
    0.094023526 = product of:
  0.18804705 = sum of:
    0.18804705 = sum of:
      0.11142061 = weight(_text_:x in 3341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11142061 = score(doc=3341,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.23882076 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056556646 = queryNorm
          0.4665449 = fieldWeight in 3341, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3341)
      0.07662645 = weight(_text_:22 in 3341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07662645 = score(doc=3341,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19805174 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056556646 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3341, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3341)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 1.2017 16:45:48
    Pages
    X, 252 S
  6. Guo, Z.; Lu, X.; Li, Yuan; Li, Yifan: ¬A framework of students' reasons for using CMC media in learning contexts : a structural approach (2011) 0.09 
    0.08843203 = sum of:
  0.06057688 = product of:
    0.24230751 = sum of:
      0.24230751 = weight(_text_:2200 in 4921) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.24230751 = score(doc=4921,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.498067 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056556646 = queryNorm
          0.48649582 = fieldWeight in 4921, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4921)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.027855152 = product of:
    0.055710305 = sum of:
      0.055710305 = weight(_text_:x in 4921) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.055710305 = score(doc=4921,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.23882076 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056556646 = queryNorm
          0.23327245 = fieldWeight in 4921, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4921)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.11, S.2182-2200
  7. Farazi, M.: Faceted lightweight ontologies : a formalization and some experiments (2010) 0.08 
    0.083997 = sum of:
  0.056141842 = product of:
    0.22456737 = sum of:
      0.22456737 = weight(_text_:3a in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.22456737 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.47948787 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056556646 = queryNorm
          0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.027855152 = product of:
    0.055710305 = sum of:
      0.055710305 = weight(_text_:x in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.055710305 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.23882076 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056556646 = queryNorm
          0.23327245 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    PhD Dissertation at International Doctorate School in Information and Communication Technology. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fcore.ac.uk%2Fdownload%2Fpdf%2F150083013.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2n-qisNagpyT0lli_6QbAQ.
    Type
    x
  8. Shala, E.: ¬Die Autonomie des Menschen und der Maschine : gegenwärtige Definitionen von Autonomie zwischen philosophischem Hintergrund und technologischer Umsetzbarkeit (2014) 0.08 
    0.083997 = sum of:
  0.056141842 = product of:
    0.22456737 = sum of:
      0.22456737 = weight(_text_:3a in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.22456737 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.47948787 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056556646 = queryNorm
          0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.027855152 = product of:
    0.055710305 = sum of:
      0.055710305 = weight(_text_:x in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.055710305 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.23882076 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056556646 = queryNorm
          0.23327245 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Vgl. unter: https://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwizweHljdbcAhVS16QKHXcFD9QQFjABegQICRAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Fpublication%2F271200105_Die_Autonomie_des_Menschen_und_der_Maschine_-_gegenwartige_Definitionen_von_Autonomie_zwischen_philosophischem_Hintergrund_und_technologischer_Umsetzbarkeit_Redigierte_Version_der_Magisterarbeit_Karls&usg=AOvVaw06orrdJmFF2xbCCp_hL26q.
    Type
    x
  9. Piros, A.: Az ETO-jelzetek automatikus interpretálásának és elemzésének kérdései (2018) 0.08 
    0.083997 = sum of:
  0.056141842 = product of:
    0.22456737 = sum of:
      0.22456737 = weight(_text_:3a in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.22456737 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.47948787 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056556646 = queryNorm
          0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.027855152 = product of:
    0.055710305 = sum of:
      0.055710305 = weight(_text_:x in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.055710305 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.23882076 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056556646 = queryNorm
          0.23327245 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl. auch: New automatic interpreter for complex UDC numbers. Unter: <https%3A%2F%2Fudcc.org%2Ffiles%2FAttilaPiros_EC_36-37_2014-2015.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3kc9CwDDCWP7aArpfjrs5b>
    Type
    x
  10. Glaesener, L.: Automatisches Indexieren einer informationswissenschaftlichen Datenbank mit Mehrwortgruppen (2012) 0.08 
    0.07521882 = product of:
  0.15043764 = sum of:
    0.15043764 = sum of:
      0.08913648 = weight(_text_:x in 401) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08913648 = score(doc=401,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.23882076 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056556646 = queryNorm
          0.3732359 = fieldWeight in 401, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=401)
      0.061301157 = weight(_text_:22 in 401) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.061301157 = score(doc=401,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19805174 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056556646 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 401, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=401)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    11. 9.2012 19:43:22
    Type
    x
  11. Xiong, C.: Knowledge based text representations for information retrieval (2016) 0.07 
    0.06719759 = sum of:
  0.044913474 = product of:
    0.1796539 = sum of:
      0.1796539 = weight(_text_:3a in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.1796539 = score(doc=5820,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.47948787 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056556646 = queryNorm
          0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.02228412 = product of:
    0.04456824 = sum of:
      0.04456824 = weight(_text_:x in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04456824 = score(doc=5820,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.23882076 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056556646 = queryNorm
          0.18661796 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Language and Information Technologies. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cs.cmu.edu%2F~cx%2Fpapers%2Fknowledge_based_text_representation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0SaTSvhWLTh__Uz_HtOtl3.
    Type
    x
  12. Castanha, R.C.G.; Wolfram, D.: ¬The domain of knowledge organization : a bibliometric analysis of prolific authors and their intellectual space (2018) 0.07 
    0.06507086 = sum of:
  0.045914248 = product of:
    0.18365699 = sum of:
      0.18365699 = weight(_text_:authors in 4150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.18365699 = score(doc=4150,freq=16.0), product of:
          0.25783125 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056556646 = queryNorm
          0.7123147 = fieldWeight in 4150, product of:
            4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
              16.0 = termFreq=16.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4150)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.019156612 = product of:
    0.038313225 = sum of:
      0.038313225 = weight(_text_:22 in 4150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.038313225 = score(doc=4150,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19805174 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056556646 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4150, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4150)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The domain of knowledge organization (KO) represents a foundational area of information science. One way to better understand the intellectual structure of the KO domain is to apply bibliometric methods to key contributors to the literature. This study analyzes the most prolific contributing authors to the journal Knowledge Organization, the sources they cite and the citations they receive for the period 1993 to 2016. The analyses were conducted using visualization outcomes of citation, co-citation and author bibliographic coupling analysis to reveal theoretical points of reference among authors and the most prominent research themes that constitute this scientific community. Birger Hjørland was the most cited author, and was situated at or near the middle of each of the maps based on different citation relationships. The proximities between authors resulting from the different citation relationships demonstrate how authors situate themselves intellectually through the citations they give and how other authors situate them through the citations received. There is a consistent core of theoretical references as well among the most productive authors. We observed a close network of scholarly communication between the authors cited in this core, which indicates the actual role of the journal Knowledge Organization as a space for knowledge construction in the area of knowledge organization.
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 45(2018) no.1, S.13-22
  13. Agenjo, X.; Hernández, F.; Viedma, A.: Data aggregation and dissemination of authority records through Linked Open Data in a European context (2012) 0.06 
    0.061723605 = sum of:
  0.022726392 = product of:
    0.09090557 = sum of:
      0.09090557 = weight(_text_:authors in 1931) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.09090557 = score(doc=1931,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.25783125 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056556646 = queryNorm
          0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 1931, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1931)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.03899721 = product of:
    0.07799442 = sum of:
      0.07799442 = weight(_text_:x in 1931) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07799442 = score(doc=1931,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.23882076 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056556646 = queryNorm
          0.32658142 = fieldWeight in 1931, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1931)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Throughout the analysis of the Polymath Virtual Library, data aggregation and dissemination of authority records through Linked Open Data are described. The aim of this virtual library is to reunite data, digital texts, and Web resources about Spanish, Hispano-American, Brazilian, and Portuguese polymaths from all times. Authors are the backbone of the system. For each author a MARC 21/Resource Description and Access (RDA) authority record has been created and enriched with biographical data. Specific attributes are categorized to enhance relationships and navigability of the site (profession, occupation, gender, memberships, birth and death dates and places, and languages) and visibility through Europeana and Linked Open Data.
  14. Du, H.; Hao, J.-X..; Kwok, R.; Wagner, C.: Can a lean medium enhance large-group communication? : Examining the impact of interactive mobile learning (2010) 0.06 
    0.06097473 = sum of:
  0.027548548 = product of:
    0.11019419 = sum of:
      0.11019419 = weight(_text_:authors in 4003) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11019419 = score(doc=4003,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.25783125 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056556646 = queryNorm
          0.42738882 = fieldWeight in 4003, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4003)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.03342618 = product of:
    0.06685236 = sum of:
      0.06685236 = weight(_text_:x in 4003) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06685236 = score(doc=4003,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.23882076 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056556646 = queryNorm
          0.27992693 = fieldWeight in 4003, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4003)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This research empirically evaluated the use of mobile information and communication technology in a large-sized undergraduate class, where the effectiveness of multilearner participation and prompt learner-instructor interaction is often challenged. The authors analyzed the effectiveness of a so-called "lean" communication medium using hand-held mobile devices, whose brief text-based messages considerably limit the speed of information exchange. Adopting a social construction perspective of media richness theory and a reinforced approach to learning and practice, the authors conjectured that an interactive learning system built with wireless PDA devices can enhance individual practices and reinforce peer influences. Consequently, they expected better understanding and higher satisfaction among learners. A field experiment with 118 participants in the treatment and 114 participants in the control group supported their hypotheses. Their results suggested that richness of a "lean" medium could be increased in certain socially constructed conditions, thus extending existing notions of computer-aided instruction towards a techno-social learning model.
  15. Soergel, D.: Knowledge organization for learning (2014) 0.06 
    0.06065455 = sum of:
  0.022726392 = product of:
    0.09090557 = sum of:
      0.09090557 = weight(_text_:authors in 1400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.09090557 = score(doc=1400,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.25783125 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056556646 = queryNorm
          0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 1400, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1400)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.037928157 = product of:
    0.07585631 = sum of:
      0.07585631 = weight(_text_:22 in 1400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07585631 = score(doc=1400,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.19805174 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056556646 = queryNorm
          0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 1400, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1400)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This paper discusses and illustrates through examples how meaningful or deep learning can be supported through well-structured presentation of material, through giving learners schemas they can use to organize knowledge in their minds, and through helping learners to understand knowledge organization principles they can use to construct their own schemas. It is a call to all authors, educators and information designers to pay attention to meaningful presentation that expresses the internal structure of the domain and facilitates the learner's assimilation of concepts and their relationships.
    Pages
    S.22-32
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  16. Shuai, X.; Rollins, J.; Moulinier, I.; Custis, T.; Edmunds, M.; Schilder, F.: ¬A multidimensional investigation of the effects of publication retraction on scholarly impact (2017) 0.06 
    0.060321428 = sum of:
  0.032466274 = product of:
    0.1298651 = sum of:
      0.1298651 = weight(_text_:authors in 3798) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.1298651 = score(doc=3798,freq=8.0), product of:
          0.25783125 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056556646 = queryNorm
          0.50368255 = fieldWeight in 3798, product of:
            2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
              8.0 = termFreq=8.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3798)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.027855152 = product of:
    0.055710305 = sum of:
      0.055710305 = weight(_text_:x in 3798) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.055710305 = score(doc=3798,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.23882076 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056556646 = queryNorm
          0.23327245 = fieldWeight in 3798, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3798)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    During the past few decades, the rate of publication retractions has increased dramatically in academia. In this study, we investigate retractions from a quantitative perspective, aiming to answer two fundamental questions. One, how do retractions influence the scholarly impact of retracted papers, authors, and institutions? Two, does this influence propagate to the wider academic community through scholarly associations? Specifically, we analyzed a set of retracted articles indexed in Thomson Reuters Web of Science (WoS), and ran multiple experiments to compare changes in scholarly impact against a control set of nonretracted articles, authors, and institutions. We further applied the Granger Causality test to investigate whether different scientific topics are dynamically affected by retracted papers occurring within those topics. Our results show two key findings: first, the scholarly impact of retracted papers and authors significantly decreases after retraction, and the most severe impact decrease correlates with retractions based on proven, purposeful scientific misconduct; second, this retraction penalty does not seem to spread through the broader scholarly social graph, but instead has a limited and localized effect. Our findings may provide useful insights for scholars or science committees to evaluate the scholarly value of papers, authors, or institutions related to retractions.
  17. Mitchell, J.S.; Zeng, M.L.; Zumer, M.: Modeling classification systems in multicultural and multilingual contexts (2012) 0.06 
    0.060058396 = sum of:
  0.027548548 = product of:
    0.11019419 = sum of:
      0.11019419 = weight(_text_:authors in 1967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11019419 = score(doc=1967,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.25783125 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056556646 = queryNorm
          0.42738882 = fieldWeight in 1967, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1967)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.03250985 = product of:
    0.0650197 = sum of:
      0.0650197 = weight(_text_:22 in 1967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0650197 = score(doc=1967,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.19805174 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056556646 = queryNorm
          0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 1967, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1967)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This paper reports on the second part of an initiative of the authors on researching classification systems with the conceptual model defined by the Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD) final report. In an earlier study, the authors explored whether the FRSAD conceptual model could be extended beyond subject authority data to model classification data. The focus of the current study is to determine if classification data modeled using FRSAD can be used to solve real-world discovery problems in multicultural and multilingual contexts. The paper discusses the relationships between entities (same type or different types) in the context of classification systems that involve multiple translations and /or multicultural implementations. Results of two case studies are presented in detail: (a) two instances of the DDC (DDC 22 in English, and the Swedish-English mixed translation of DDC 22), and (b) Chinese Library Classification. The use cases of conceptual models in practice are also discussed.
  18. Mugridge, R.L.; Edmunds, J.: Batchloading MARC bibliographic records (2012) 0.06 
    0.058959227 = sum of:
  0.03213997 = product of:
    0.12855989 = sum of:
      0.12855989 = weight(_text_:authors in 2600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.12855989 = score(doc=2600,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.25783125 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056556646 = queryNorm
          0.49862027 = fieldWeight in 2600, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2600)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.026819255 = product of:
    0.05363851 = sum of:
      0.05363851 = weight(_text_:22 in 2600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05363851 = score(doc=2600,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19805174 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056556646 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2600, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2600)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Research libraries are using batchloading to provide access to many resources that they would otherwise be unable to catalog given the staff and other resources available. To explore how such libraries are managing their batchloading activities, the authors conducted a survey of the Association for Library Collections and Technical Services Directors of Large Research Libraries Interest Group member libraries. The survey addressed staffing, budgets, scope, workflow, management, quality standards, information technology support, collaborative efforts, and assessment of batchloading activities. The authors provide an analysis of the survey results along with suggestions for process improvements and future research.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  19. Chaves Guimarães, J.A.; Oliveira, E.T. de; Cabrini Gracio, M.C.: Theoretical referents in Knowledge Organization : a domain analysis of the Knowledge Organization journal (2012) 0.06 
    0.05891951 = sum of:
  0.0397629 = product of:
    0.1590516 = sum of:
      0.1590516 = weight(_text_:authors in 823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.1590516 = score(doc=823,freq=12.0), product of:
          0.25783125 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056556646 = queryNorm
          0.61688256 = fieldWeight in 823, product of:
            3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
              12.0 = termFreq=12.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=823)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.019156612 = product of:
    0.038313225 = sum of:
      0.038313225 = weight(_text_:22 in 823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.038313225 = score(doc=823,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19805174 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056556646 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 823, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=823)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Aiming at contributing to the epistemological characterization of the area of knowledge organization, our goal is to analyze the KO journal, since its creation in 1993, as a knowledge domain, from a nuclear community of the most productive and greater impact authors, analyzing the dialogue among citing authors and cited ones, and also the co-citations established by the citing authors. We worked with a corpus of 310 articles published between 1993 and 2011 produced by a total of 360 authors. The relatively more productive authors, a group geographically concentrated in Europe (37%), North America (44%) and Asia (19%), is clearly explained by the historical European origin of the ISKO and by an increasing North American presence along the years. Of the 33 most cited authors, 22 were co-cited in at least 6 works, which suggests that they are the theoretical referential nucleus of the area, in the studied journal. Finally, we observe that the area reveals theme cohesion and coherence in its production, enabling us to clearly visualize its theoretical referential nucleus and to confirm the role performed by the KO magazine as a catalyzing agent of international theoretical construction in the area.
  20. Ajiferuke, I.; Lu, K.; Wolfram, D.: ¬A comparison of citer and citation-based measure outcomes for multiple disciplines (2010) 0.06 
    0.05672788 = sum of:
  0.033739943 = product of:
    0.13495977 = sum of:
      0.13495977 = weight(_text_:authors in 4000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.13495977 = score(doc=4000,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.25783125 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056556646 = queryNorm
          0.52344227 = fieldWeight in 4000, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4000)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.022987934 = product of:
    0.045975868 = sum of:
      0.045975868 = weight(_text_:22 in 4000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.045975868 = score(doc=4000,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19805174 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056556646 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4000, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4000)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Author research impact was examined based on citer analysis (the number of citers as opposed to the number of citations) for 90 highly cited authors grouped into three broad subject areas. Citer-based outcome measures were also compared with more traditional citation-based measures for levels of association. The authors found that there are significant differences in citer-based outcomes among the three broad subject areas examined and that there is a high degree of correlation between citer and citation-based measures for all measures compared, except for two outcomes calculated for the social sciences. Citer-based measures do produce slightly different rankings of authors based on citer counts when compared to more traditional citation counts. Examples are provided. Citation measures may not adequately address the influence, or reach, of an author because citations usually do not address the origin of the citation beyond self-citations.
    Date
    28. 9.2010 12:54:22

Authors

Languages

  • e 964
  • d 262
  • a 2
  • f 2
  • hu 1
  • pt 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 1027
  • el 96
  • x 95
  • m 80
  • s 24
  • r 8
  • n 6
  • b 5
  • ag 1
  • i 1
  • z 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications