Search (2199 results, page 1 of 110)

0.09100643 = sum of:
  0.07322138 = product of:
    0.2928855 = sum of:
      0.2928855 = weight(_text_:3a in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.2928855 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.44668442 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052687407 = queryNorm
          0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.01778505 = product of:
    0.0355701 = sum of:
      0.0355701 = weight(_text_:h in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0355701 = score(doc=5955,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.13089918 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052687407 = queryNorm
          0.27173662 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

Rez. in: Philosophisch-ethische Rezensionen vom 09.11.2019 (Jürgen Czogalla), Unter: https://philosophisch-ethische-rezensionen.de/rezension/Goedert1.html. In: B.I.T. online 23(2020) H.3, S.345-347 (W. Sühl-Strohmenger) [Unter: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.b-i-t-online.de%2Fheft%2F2020-03-rezensionen.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0iY3f_zNcvEjeZ6inHVnOK]. In: Open Password Nr. 805 vom 14.08.2020 (H.-C. Hobohm) [Unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzE0MywiOGI3NjZkZmNkZjQ1IiwwLDAsMTMxLDFd].

0.075044245 = sum of:
  0.021386545 = product of:
    0.08554618 = sum of:
      0.08554618 = weight(_text_:authors in 4959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08554618 = score(doc=4959,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.24019209 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052687407 = queryNorm
          0.35615736 = fieldWeight in 4959, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4959)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.053657696 = sum of:
    0.017965615 = weight(_text_:h in 4959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017965615 = score(doc=4959,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13089918 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052687407 = queryNorm
        0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 4959, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4959)
    0.03569208 = weight(_text_:22 in 4959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03569208 = score(doc=4959,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18450232 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052687407 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4959, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4959)

Abstract

This study uses three bibliometric methods: direct citation, bibliographic coupling, and co-authorship analysis, to investigate interdisciplinary changes in library and information science (LIS) from 1978 to 2007. The results reveal that LIS researchers most frequently cite publications in their own discipline. In addition, half of all co-authors of LIS articles are affiliated with LIS-related institutes. The results confirm that the degree of interdisciplinarity within LIS has increased, particularly co-authorship. However, the study found sources of direct citations in LIS articles are widely distributed across 30 disciplines, but co-authors of LIS articles are distributed across only 25 disciplines. The degree of interdisciplinarity was found ranging from 0.61 to 0.82 with citation to references in all articles being the highest and that of co-authorship being the lowest. Percentages of contribution attributable to LIS show a decreasing tendency based on the results of direct citation and co-authorship analysis, but an increasing tendency based on those of bibliographic coupling analysis. Such differences indicate each of the three bibliometric methods has its strength and provides insights respectively for viewing various aspects of interdisciplinarity, suggesting the use of no single bibliometric method can reveal all aspects of interdisciplinarity due to its multifaceted nature.

Source

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.1, S.22-33

0.07354054 = sum of:
  0.06276117 = product of:
    0.2510447 = sum of:
      0.2510447 = weight(_text_:3a in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.2510447 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.44668442 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052687407 = queryNorm
          0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.010779368 = product of:
    0.021558736 = sum of:
      0.021558736 = weight(_text_:h in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.021558736 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.13089918 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052687407 = queryNorm
          0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

https%3A%2F%2Fjournals.univie.ac.at%2Findex.php%2Fvoebm%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F5332%2F5271%2F&usg=AOvVaw2yQdFGHlmOwVls7ANCpTii.

Source

Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. 73(2020) H.3/4, S.496-503

0.06438923 = product of:
  0.12877846 = sum of:
    0.12877846 = sum of:
      0.04311747 = weight(_text_:h in 1808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04311747 = score(doc=1808,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.13089918 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052687407 = queryNorm
          0.32939452 = fieldWeight in 1808, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1808)
      0.085660994 = weight(_text_:22 in 1808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.085660994 = score(doc=1808,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18450232 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052687407 = queryNorm
          0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1808, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1808)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

17. 9.2018 18:19:22

Footnote

Rez. in: Mitteilungen VOEB 67(2014) H.1, S.174-178 (O. Oberhauser)

0.06438923 = product of:
  0.12877846 = sum of:
    0.12877846 = sum of:
      0.04311747 = weight(_text_:h in 4248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04311747 = score(doc=4248,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.13089918 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052687407 = queryNorm
          0.32939452 = fieldWeight in 4248, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4248)
      0.085660994 = weight(_text_:22 in 4248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.085660994 = score(doc=4248,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18450232 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052687407 = queryNorm
          0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4248, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4248)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 2011, H.2, S.22-29

0.06438923 = product of:
  0.12877846 = sum of:
    0.12877846 = sum of:
      0.04311747 = weight(_text_:h in 1489) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04311747 = score(doc=1489,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.13089918 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052687407 = queryNorm
          0.32939452 = fieldWeight in 1489, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1489)
      0.085660994 = weight(_text_:22 in 1489) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.085660994 = score(doc=1489,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18450232 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052687407 = queryNorm
          0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1489, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1489)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

6. 7.2014 18:22:33

Source

Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 65(2014) H.3, S.156-162

0.06438923 = product of:
  0.12877846 = sum of:
    0.12877846 = sum of:
      0.04311747 = weight(_text_:h in 4208) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04311747 = score(doc=4208,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.13089918 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052687407 = queryNorm
          0.32939452 = fieldWeight in 4208, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4208)
      0.085660994 = weight(_text_:22 in 4208) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.085660994 = score(doc=4208,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18450232 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052687407 = queryNorm
          0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4208, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4208)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

7. 4.2015 17:22:03

Source

Mitteilungen der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung. 2015, H.1, S.10-11

0.06438923 = product of:
  0.12877846 = sum of:
    0.12877846 = sum of:
      0.04311747 = weight(_text_:h in 4973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04311747 = score(doc=4973,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.13089918 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052687407 = queryNorm
          0.32939452 = fieldWeight in 4973, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4973)
      0.085660994 = weight(_text_:22 in 4973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.085660994 = score(doc=4973,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18450232 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052687407 = queryNorm
          0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4973, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4973)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

1. 2.2019 12:50:22

Source

Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 65(2018) H.1, S.3-7

0.06438923 = product of:
  0.12877846 = sum of:
    0.12877846 = sum of:
      0.04311747 = weight(_text_:h in 5629) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04311747 = score(doc=5629,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.13089918 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052687407 = queryNorm
          0.32939452 = fieldWeight in 5629, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5629)
      0.085660994 = weight(_text_:22 in 5629) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.085660994 = score(doc=5629,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18450232 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052687407 = queryNorm
          0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5629, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5629)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

B.I.T.online. 22(2019) H.2, S.163-166

0.06276117 = product of:
  0.12552235 = sum of:
    0.12552235 = product of:
      0.5020894 = sum of:
        0.5020894 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.5020894 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.44668442 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052687407 = queryNorm
            1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.

0.0610993 = product of:
  0.1221986 = sum of:
    0.1221986 = sum of:
      0.05081443 = weight(_text_:h in 4523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05081443 = score(doc=4523,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.13089918 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052687407 = queryNorm
          0.3881952 = fieldWeight in 4523, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4523)
      0.07138416 = weight(_text_:22 in 4523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07138416 = score(doc=4523,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18450232 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052687407 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4523, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4523)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Vgl. auch den Beitrag: Sokol, J.: Spielend lernen. In: Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 2018, H.11, S.72-76.

Source

Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 2018, H.1, S.22-27

0.06061913 = sum of:
  0.04277309 = product of:
    0.17109236 = sum of:
      0.17109236 = weight(_text_:authors in 4150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.17109236 = score(doc=4150,freq=16.0), product of:
          0.24019209 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052687407 = queryNorm
          0.7123147 = fieldWeight in 4150, product of:
            4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
              16.0 = termFreq=16.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4150)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.01784604 = product of:
    0.03569208 = sum of:
      0.03569208 = weight(_text_:22 in 4150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03569208 = score(doc=4150,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18450232 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052687407 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4150, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4150)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The domain of knowledge organization (KO) represents a foundational area of information science. One way to better understand the intellectual structure of the KO domain is to apply bibliometric methods to key contributors to the literature. This study analyzes the most prolific contributing authors to the journal Knowledge Organization, the sources they cite and the citations they receive for the period 1993 to 2016. The analyses were conducted using visualization outcomes of citation, co-citation and author bibliographic coupling analysis to reveal theoretical points of reference among authors and the most prominent research themes that constitute this scientific community. Birger Hjørland was the most cited author, and was situated at or near the middle of each of the maps based on different citation relationships. The proximities between authors resulting from the different citation relationships demonstrate how authors situate themselves intellectually through the citations they give and how other authors situate them through the citations received. There is a consistent core of theoretical references as well among the most productive authors. We observed a close network of scholarly communication between the authors cited in this core, which indicates the actual role of the journal Knowledge Organization as a space for knowledge construction in the area of knowledge organization.

Source

Knowledge organization. 45(2018) no.1, S.13-22

0.060035393 = sum of:
  0.017109236 = product of:
    0.06843694 = sum of:
      0.06843694 = weight(_text_:authors in 367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06843694 = score(doc=367,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.24019209 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052687407 = queryNorm
          0.28492588 = fieldWeight in 367, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=367)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.042926155 = sum of:
    0.014372491 = weight(_text_:h in 367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014372491 = score(doc=367,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13089918 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052687407 = queryNorm
        0.10979818 = fieldWeight in 367, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=367)
    0.028553665 = weight(_text_:22 in 367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028553665 = score(doc=367,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18450232 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052687407 = queryNorm
        0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 367, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=367)

Abstract

The proliferation of discipline-specific metadata schemes contributes to artificial barriers that can impede interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research. The authors considered this problem by examining the domains, objectives, and architectures of nine metadata schemes used to document scientific data in the physical, life, and social sciences. They used a mixed-methods content analysis and Greenberg's () metadata objectives, principles, domains, and architectural layout (MODAL) framework, and derived 22 metadata-related goals from textual content describing each metadata scheme. Relationships are identified between the domains (e.g., scientific discipline and type of data) and the categories of scheme objectives. For each strong correlation (>0.6), a Fisher's exact test for nonparametric data was used to determine significance (p < .05). Significant relationships were found between the domains and objectives of the schemes. Schemes describing observational data are more likely to have "scheme harmonization" (compatibility and interoperability with related schemes) as an objective; schemes with the objective "abstraction" (a conceptual model exists separate from the technical implementation) also have the objective "sufficiency" (the scheme defines a minimal amount of information to meet the needs of the community); and schemes with the objective "data publication" do not have the objective "element refinement." The analysis indicates that many metadata-driven goals expressed by communities are independent of scientific discipline or the type of data, although they are constrained by historical community practices and workflows as well as the technological environment at the time of scheme creation. The analysis reveals 11 fundamental metadata goals for metadata documenting scientific data in support of sharing research data across disciplines and domains. The authors report these results and highlight the need for more metadata-related research, particularly in the context of recent funding agency policy changes.

0.056504957 = sum of:
  0.021171598 = product of:
    0.08468639 = sum of:
      0.08468639 = weight(_text_:authors in 1400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08468639 = score(doc=1400,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.24019209 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052687407 = queryNorm
          0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 1400, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1400)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.035333358 = product of:
    0.070666716 = sum of:
      0.070666716 = weight(_text_:22 in 1400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.070666716 = score(doc=1400,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.18450232 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052687407 = queryNorm
          0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 1400, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1400)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This paper discusses and illustrates through examples how meaningful or deep learning can be supported through well-structured presentation of material, through giving learners schemas they can use to organize knowledge in their minds, and through helping learners to understand knowledge organization principles they can use to construct their own schemas. It is a call to all authors, educators and information designers to pay attention to meaningful presentation that expresses the internal structure of the domain and facilitates the learner's assimilation of concepts and their relationships.

Pages

S.22-32

Source

Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik

0.05594959 = sum of:
  0.025663853 = product of:
    0.10265541 = sum of:
      0.10265541 = weight(_text_:authors in 1967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.10265541 = score(doc=1967,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.24019209 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052687407 = queryNorm
          0.42738882 = fieldWeight in 1967, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1967)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.030285737 = product of:
    0.060571473 = sum of:
      0.060571473 = weight(_text_:22 in 1967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.060571473 = score(doc=1967,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.18450232 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052687407 = queryNorm
          0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 1967, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1967)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This paper reports on the second part of an initiative of the authors on researching classification systems with the conceptual model defined by the Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD) final report. In an earlier study, the authors explored whether the FRSAD conceptual model could be extended beyond subject authority data to model classification data. The focus of the current study is to determine if classification data modeled using FRSAD can be used to solve real-world discovery problems in multicultural and multilingual contexts. The paper discusses the relationships between entities (same type or different types) in the context of classification systems that involve multiple translations and /or multicultural implementations. Results of two case studies are presented in detail: (a) two instances of the DDC (DDC 22 in English, and the Swedish-English mixed translation of DDC 22), and (b) Chinese Library Classification. The use cases of conceptual models in practice are also discussed.

0.054925617 = sum of:
  0.02994116 = product of:
    0.11976464 = sum of:
      0.11976464 = weight(_text_:authors in 2600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11976464 = score(doc=2600,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.24019209 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052687407 = queryNorm
          0.49862027 = fieldWeight in 2600, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2600)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.024984457 = product of:
    0.049968913 = sum of:
      0.049968913 = weight(_text_:22 in 2600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.049968913 = score(doc=2600,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18450232 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052687407 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2600, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2600)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Research libraries are using batchloading to provide access to many resources that they would otherwise be unable to catalog given the staff and other resources available. To explore how such libraries are managing their batchloading activities, the authors conducted a survey of the Association for Library Collections and Technical Services Directors of Large Research Libraries Interest Group member libraries. The survey addressed staffing, budgets, scope, workflow, management, quality standards, information technology support, collaborative efforts, and assessment of batchloading activities. The authors provide an analysis of the survey results along with suggestions for process improvements and future research.

Date

10. 9.2000 17:38:22

0.054888617 = sum of:
  0.037042577 = product of:
    0.1481703 = sum of:
      0.1481703 = weight(_text_:authors in 823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.1481703 = score(doc=823,freq=12.0), product of:
          0.24019209 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052687407 = queryNorm
          0.61688256 = fieldWeight in 823, product of:
            3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
              12.0 = termFreq=12.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=823)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.01784604 = product of:
    0.03569208 = sum of:
      0.03569208 = weight(_text_:22 in 823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03569208 = score(doc=823,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18450232 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052687407 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 823, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=823)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Aiming at contributing to the epistemological characterization of the area of knowledge organization, our goal is to analyze the KO journal, since its creation in 1993, as a knowledge domain, from a nuclear community of the most productive and greater impact authors, analyzing the dialogue among citing authors and cited ones, and also the co-citations established by the citing authors. We worked with a corpus of 310 articles published between 1993 and 2011 produced by a total of 360 authors. The relatively more productive authors, a group geographically concentrated in Europe (37%), North America (44%) and Asia (19%), is clearly explained by the historical European origin of the ISKO and by an increasing North American presence along the years. Of the 33 most cited authors, 22 were co-cited in at least 6 works, which suggests that they are the theoretical referential nucleus of the area, in the studied journal. Finally, we observe that the area reveals theme cohesion and coherence in its production, enabling us to clearly visualize its theoretical referential nucleus and to confirm the role performed by the KO magazine as a catalyzing agent of international theoretical construction in the area.

0.05475347 = product of:
  0.10950694 = sum of:
    0.10950694 = sum of:
      0.028744983 = weight(_text_:h in 1699) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.028744983 = score(doc=1699,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.13089918 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052687407 = queryNorm
          0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 1699, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1699)
      0.08076196 = weight(_text_:22 in 1699) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08076196 = score(doc=1699,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.18450232 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052687407 = queryNorm
          0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 1699, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1699)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Dialog mit Bibliotheken. 22(2010) H.1, S.20-22

0.053657696 = product of:
  0.10731539 = sum of:
    0.10731539 = sum of:
      0.03593123 = weight(_text_:h in 1838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03593123 = score(doc=1838,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.13089918 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052687407 = queryNorm
          0.27449545 = fieldWeight in 1838, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1838)
      0.07138416 = weight(_text_:22 in 1838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07138416 = score(doc=1838,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18450232 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052687407 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1838, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1838)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

6.12.2015 17:22:08

Source

Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 66(2015) H.5/6, S.285-286

0.053657696 = product of:
  0.10731539 = sum of:
    0.10731539 = sum of:
      0.03593123 = weight(_text_:h in 3823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03593123 = score(doc=3823,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.13089918 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052687407 = queryNorm
          0.27449545 = fieldWeight in 3823, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3823)
      0.07138416 = weight(_text_:22 in 3823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07138416 = score(doc=3823,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18450232 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052687407 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3823, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3823)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

23. 7.2011 13:13:22

Source

Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 2011, H.8, S.56-60