Search (2998 results, page 1 of 150)

  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011) 0.14 
    0.13862336 = sum of:
  0.12597127 = product of:
    0.5038851 = sum of:
      0.5038851 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.5038851 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.44828197 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052875843 = queryNorm
          1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.012652089 = product of:
    0.025304178 = sum of:
      0.025304178 = weight(_text_:d in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.025304178 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.10045733 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052875843 = queryNorm
          0.2518898 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
    Language
    d
  2. Soergel, D.: Knowledge organization for learning (2014) 0.11 
    0.106927544 = sum of:
  0.021247318 = product of:
    0.08498927 = sum of:
      0.08498927 = weight(_text_:authors in 1400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08498927 = score(doc=1400,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.24105114 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052875843 = queryNorm
          0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 1400, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1400)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.085680224 = sum of:
    0.01476077 = weight(_text_:d in 1400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01476077 = score(doc=1400,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10045733 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052875843 = queryNorm
        0.14693572 = fieldWeight in 1400, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1400)
    0.070919454 = weight(_text_:22 in 1400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.070919454 = score(doc=1400,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.18516219 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052875843 = queryNorm
        0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 1400, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1400)
    Abstract
    This paper discusses and illustrates through examples how meaningful or deep learning can be supported through well-structured presentation of material, through giving learners schemas they can use to organize knowledge in their minds, and through helping learners to understand knowledge organization principles they can use to construct their own schemas. It is a call to all authors, educators and information designers to pay attention to meaningful presentation that expresses the internal structure of the domain and facilitates the learner's assimilation of concepts and their relationships.
    Pages
    S.22-32
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  3. Castanha, R.C.G.; Wolfram, D.: ¬The domain of knowledge organization : a bibliometric analysis of prolific authors and their intellectual space (2018) 0.09 
    0.0892892 = sum of:
  0.04292607 = product of:
    0.17170428 = sum of:
      0.17170428 = weight(_text_:authors in 4150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.17170428 = score(doc=4150,freq=16.0), product of:
          0.24105114 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052875843 = queryNorm
          0.7123147 = fieldWeight in 4150, product of:
            4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
              16.0 = termFreq=16.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4150)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.046363138 = sum of:
    0.010543408 = weight(_text_:d in 4150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010543408 = score(doc=4150,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10045733 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052875843 = queryNorm
        0.104954086 = fieldWeight in 4150, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4150)
    0.03581973 = weight(_text_:22 in 4150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03581973 = score(doc=4150,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18516219 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052875843 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4150, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4150)
    Abstract
    The domain of knowledge organization (KO) represents a foundational area of information science. One way to better understand the intellectual structure of the KO domain is to apply bibliometric methods to key contributors to the literature. This study analyzes the most prolific contributing authors to the journal Knowledge Organization, the sources they cite and the citations they receive for the period 1993 to 2016. The analyses were conducted using visualization outcomes of citation, co-citation and author bibliographic coupling analysis to reveal theoretical points of reference among authors and the most prominent research themes that constitute this scientific community. Birger Hjørland was the most cited author, and was situated at or near the middle of each of the maps based on different citation relationships. The proximities between authors resulting from the different citation relationships demonstrate how authors situate themselves intellectually through the citations they give and how other authors situate them through the citations received. There is a consistent core of theoretical references as well among the most productive authors. We observed a close network of scholarly communication between the authors cited in this core, which indicates the actual role of the journal Knowledge Organization as a space for knowledge construction in the area of knowledge organization.
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 45(2018) no.1, S.13-22
  4. Ajiferuke, I.; Lu, K.; Wolfram, D.: ¬A comparison of citer and citation-based measure outcomes for multiple disciplines (2010) 0.09 
    0.087179855 = sum of:
  0.03154409 = product of:
    0.12617636 = sum of:
      0.12617636 = weight(_text_:authors in 4000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.12617636 = score(doc=4000,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.24105114 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052875843 = queryNorm
          0.52344227 = fieldWeight in 4000, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4000)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.055635765 = sum of:
    0.012652089 = weight(_text_:d in 4000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012652089 = score(doc=4000,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10045733 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052875843 = queryNorm
        0.1259449 = fieldWeight in 4000, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4000)
    0.042983677 = weight(_text_:22 in 4000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.042983677 = score(doc=4000,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18516219 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052875843 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4000, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4000)
    Abstract
    Author research impact was examined based on citer analysis (the number of citers as opposed to the number of citations) for 90 highly cited authors grouped into three broad subject areas. Citer-based outcome measures were also compared with more traditional citation-based measures for levels of association. The authors found that there are significant differences in citer-based outcomes among the three broad subject areas examined and that there is a high degree of correlation between citer and citation-based measures for all measures compared, except for two outcomes calculated for the social sciences. Citer-based measures do produce slightly different rankings of authors based on citer counts when compared to more traditional citation counts. Examples are provided. Citation measures may not adequately address the influence, or reach, of an author because citations usually do not address the origin of the citation beyond self-citations.
    Date
    28. 9.2010 12:54:22
  5. Gödert, W.; Lepsky, K.: Informationelle Kompetenz : ein humanistischer Entwurf (2019) 0.08 
    0.08086364 = sum of:
  0.07348325 = product of:
    0.293933 = sum of:
      0.293933 = weight(_text_:3a in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.293933 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.44828197 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052875843 = queryNorm
          0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.007380385 = product of:
    0.01476077 = sum of:
      0.01476077 = weight(_text_:d in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.01476077 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.10045733 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052875843 = queryNorm
          0.14693572 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Philosophisch-ethische Rezensionen vom 09.11.2019 (Jürgen Czogalla), Unter: https://philosophisch-ethische-rezensionen.de/rezension/Goedert1.html. In: B.I.T. online 23(2020) H.3, S.345-347 (W. Sühl-Strohmenger) [Unter: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.b-i-t-online.de%2Fheft%2F2020-03-rezensionen.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0iY3f_zNcvEjeZ6inHVnOK]. In: Open Password Nr. 805 vom 14.08.2020 (H.-C. Hobohm) [Unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzE0MywiOGI3NjZkZmNkZjQ1IiwwLDAsMTMxLDFd].
    Language
    d
  6. Lewandowski, D.; Sünkler, S.: What does Google recommend when you want to compare insurance offerings? (2019) 0.08 
    0.07671645 = sum of:
  0.030353313 = product of:
    0.12141325 = sum of:
      0.12141325 = weight(_text_:authors in 5288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.12141325 = score(doc=5288,freq=8.0), product of:
          0.24105114 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052875843 = queryNorm
          0.50368255 = fieldWeight in 5288, product of:
            2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
              8.0 = termFreq=8.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5288)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.046363138 = sum of:
    0.010543408 = weight(_text_:d in 5288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010543408 = score(doc=5288,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10045733 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052875843 = queryNorm
        0.104954086 = fieldWeight in 5288, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5288)
    0.03581973 = weight(_text_:22 in 5288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03581973 = score(doc=5288,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18516219 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052875843 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5288, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5288)
    Abstract
    Purpose The purpose of this paper is to describe a new method to improve the analysis of search engine results by considering the provider level as well as the domain level. This approach is tested by conducting a study using queries on the topic of insurance comparisons. Design/methodology/approach The authors conducted an empirical study that analyses the results of search queries aimed at comparing insurance companies. The authors used a self-developed software system that automatically queries commercial search engines and automatically extracts the content of the returned result pages for further data analysis. The data analysis was carried out using the KNIME Analytics Platform. Findings Google's top search results are served by only a few providers that frequently appear in these results. The authors show that some providers operate several domains on the same topic and that these domains appear for the same queries in the result lists. Research limitations/implications The authors demonstrate the feasibility of this approach and draw conclusions for further investigations from the empirical study. However, the study is a limited use case based on a limited number of search queries. Originality/value The proposed method allows large-scale analysis of the composition of the top results from commercial search engines. It allows using valid empirical data to determine what users actually see on the search engine result pages.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  7. Hafner, R.; Schelling, B.: Automatisierung der Sacherschließung mit Semantic Web Technologie (2015) 0.07 
    0.07102251 = product of:
  0.14204502 = sum of:
    0.14204502 = sum of:
      0.041749764 = weight(_text_:d in 8365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.041749764 = score(doc=8365,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.10045733 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052875843 = queryNorm
          0.415597 = fieldWeight in 8365, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
            0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8365)
      0.10029525 = weight(_text_:22 in 8365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.10029525 = score(doc=8365,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18516219 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052875843 = queryNorm
          0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 8365, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8365)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 6.2015 16:08:38
    Language
    d
    Location
    D
  8. Suchenwirth, L.: Sacherschliessung in Zeiten von Corona : neue Herausforderungen und Chancen (2019) 0.07 
    0.06931168 = sum of:
  0.06298564 = product of:
    0.25194255 = sum of:
      0.25194255 = weight(_text_:3a in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.25194255 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.44828197 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052875843 = queryNorm
          0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.0063260444 = product of:
    0.012652089 = sum of:
      0.012652089 = weight(_text_:d in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.012652089 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.10045733 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052875843 = queryNorm
          0.1259449 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    https%3A%2F%2Fjournals.univie.ac.at%2Findex.php%2Fvoebm%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F5332%2F5271%2F&usg=AOvVaw2yQdFGHlmOwVls7ANCpTii.
    Language
    d
  9. Torres-Salinas, D.; Gorraiz, J.; Robinson-Garcia, N.: ¬The insoluble problems of books : what does Altmetric.com have to offer? (2018) 0.07 
    0.06683056 = sum of:
  0.02974005 = product of:
    0.1189602 = sum of:
      0.1189602 = weight(_text_:authors in 4633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.1189602 = score(doc=4633,freq=12.0), product of:
          0.24105114 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052875843 = queryNorm
          0.49350607 = fieldWeight in 4633, product of:
            3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
              12.0 = termFreq=12.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4633)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.03709051 = sum of:
    0.008434726 = weight(_text_:d in 4633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008434726 = score(doc=4633,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10045733 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052875843 = queryNorm
        0.08396327 = fieldWeight in 4633, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4633)
    0.028655786 = weight(_text_:22 in 4633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028655786 = score(doc=4633,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18516219 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052875843 = queryNorm
        0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 4633, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4633)
    Abstract
    Purpose The purpose of this paper is to analyze the capabilities, functionalities and appropriateness of Altmetric.com as a data source for the bibliometric analysis of books in comparison to PlumX. Design/methodology/approach The authors perform an exploratory analysis on the metrics the Altmetric Explorer for Institutions, platform offers for books. The authors use two distinct data sets of books. On the one hand, the authors analyze the Book Collection included in Altmetric.com. On the other hand, the authors use Clarivate's Master Book List, to analyze Altmetric.com's capabilities to download and merge data with external databases. Finally, the authors compare the findings with those obtained in a previous study performed in PlumX. Findings Altmetric.com combines and orderly tracks a set of data sources combined by DOI identifiers to retrieve metadata from books, being Google Books its main provider. It also retrieves information from commercial publishers and from some Open Access initiatives, including those led by university libraries, such as Harvard Library. We find issues with linkages between records and mentions or ISBN discrepancies. Furthermore, the authors find that automatic bots affect greatly Wikipedia mentions to books. The comparison with PlumX suggests that none of these tools provide a complete picture of the social attention generated by books and are rather complementary than comparable tools. Practical implications This study targets different audience which can benefit from the findings. First, bibliometricians and researchers who seek for alternative sources to develop bibliometric analyses of books, with a special focus on the Social Sciences and Humanities fields. Second, librarians and research managers who are the main clients to which these tools are directed. Third, Altmetric.com itself as well as other altmetric providers who might get a better understanding of the limitations users encounter and improve this promising tool. Originality/value This is the first study to analyze Altmetric.com's functionalities and capabilities for providing metric data for books and to compare results from this platform, with those obtained via PlumX.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  10. Parrochia, D.; Neuville, D.: Towards a general theory of classifications (2013) 0.07 
    0.06590702 = sum of:
  0.015176657 = product of:
    0.060706627 = sum of:
      0.060706627 = weight(_text_:authors in 3100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.060706627 = score(doc=3100,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.24105114 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052875843 = queryNorm
          0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 3100, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3100)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.050730363 = sum of:
    0.014910631 = weight(_text_:d in 3100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014910631 = score(doc=3100,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.10045733 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052875843 = queryNorm
        0.1484275 = fieldWeight in 3100, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3100)
    0.03581973 = weight(_text_:22 in 3100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03581973 = score(doc=3100,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18516219 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052875843 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3100, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3100)
    Abstract
    This book is an essay on the epistemology of classifications. Its main purpose is not to provide an exposition of an actual mathematical theory of classifications, that is, a general theory which would be available to any kind of them: hierarchical or non-hierarchical, ordinary or fuzzy, overlapping or not overlapping, finite or infinite, and so on, establishing a basis for all possible divisions of the real world. For the moment, such a theory remains nothing but a dream. Instead, the authors are essentially put forward a number of key questions. Their aim is rather to reveal the "state of art" of this dynamic field and the philosophy one may eventually adopt to go further. To this end they present some advances made in the course of the last century, discuss a few tricky problems that remain to be solved, and show the avenues open to those who no longer wish to stay on the wrong track. Researchers and professionals interested in the epistemology and philosophy of science, library science, logic and set theory, order theory or cluster analysis will find this book a comprehensive, original and progressive introduction to the main questions in this field.
    Date
    8. 9.2016 22:04:09
  11. Hallonsten, O.; Holmberg, D.: Analyzing structural stratification in the Swedish higher education system : data contextualization with policy-history analysis (2013) 0.06 
    0.061539795 = sum of:
  0.015176657 = product of:
    0.060706627 = sum of:
      0.060706627 = weight(_text_:authors in 668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.060706627 = score(doc=668,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.24105114 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052875843 = queryNorm
          0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 668, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=668)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.046363138 = sum of:
    0.010543408 = weight(_text_:d in 668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010543408 = score(doc=668,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10045733 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052875843 = queryNorm
        0.104954086 = fieldWeight in 668, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=668)
    0.03581973 = weight(_text_:22 in 668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03581973 = score(doc=668,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18516219 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052875843 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 668, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=668)
    Abstract
    20th century massification of higher education and research in academia is said to have produced structurally stratified higher education systems in many countries. Most manifestly, the research mission of universities appears to be divisive. Authors have claimed that the Swedish system, while formally unified, has developed into a binary state, and statistics seem to support this conclusion. This article makes use of a comprehensive statistical data source on Swedish higher education institutions to illustrate stratification, and uses literature on Swedish research policy history to contextualize the statistics. Highlighting the opportunities as well as constraints of the data, the article argues that there is great merit in combining statistics with a qualitative analysis when studying the structural characteristics of national higher education systems. Not least the article shows that it is an over-simplification to describe the Swedish system as binary; the stratification is more complex. On basis of the analysis, the article also argues that while global trends certainly influence national developments, higher education systems have country-specific features that may enrich the understanding of how systems evolve and therefore should be analyzed as part of a broader study of the increasingly globalized academic system.
    Date
    22. 3.2013 19:43:01
  12. Sinn, D.; Soares, N.: Historians' use of digital archival collections : the web, historical scholarship, and archival research (2014) 0.06 
    0.061539795 = sum of:
  0.015176657 = product of:
    0.060706627 = sum of:
      0.060706627 = weight(_text_:authors in 1349) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.060706627 = score(doc=1349,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.24105114 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052875843 = queryNorm
          0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 1349, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1349)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.046363138 = sum of:
    0.010543408 = weight(_text_:d in 1349) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010543408 = score(doc=1349,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10045733 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052875843 = queryNorm
        0.104954086 = fieldWeight in 1349, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1349)
    0.03581973 = weight(_text_:22 in 1349) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03581973 = score(doc=1349,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18516219 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052875843 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1349, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1349)
    Abstract
    This article reports a research study about historians' experiences using digital archival collections for research articles that they published in the American Historical Review. We contacted these authors to ask about their research processes, with regard to digital archival collections, and their perceptions of the usefulness of digital archival collections to historical research. This study presents a realistic portrayal of the "uses" and "impacts" of digital primary sources from the perspectives of historians who use digital collections for their research projects. The findings from this study indicate that digital archival collections are important source materials for historical studies for various reasons. However, the amount of authority digital materials possess as historical resources was disputed. Many historians preferred documents in their original form, but historians' preferences began to change as they increasingly consulted digital formats. As the web has developed into an important research platform, historians have adopted different research patterns, one of which is using random web searches to find digital primary sources. Historians' understandings of the "use" of digital archival collections revealed a spectrum of activities including finding, understanding, interpreting, and citing digital information. Historians in this study worked concurrently on multiple studies or on a larger project for a book, and each of their searches for digital collections had the potential to provide them with useful results for several research studies.
    Date
    22. 8.2014 17:03:50
  13. Chaves Guimarães, J.A.; Sales, R. de; Martínez-Ávila, D.; Alencar, M.F.: ¬The conceptual dimension of knowledge organization in the ISKO proceedings domain : a Bardinian content analysis (2014) 0.06 
    0.061539795 = sum of:
  0.015176657 = product of:
    0.060706627 = sum of:
      0.060706627 = weight(_text_:authors in 1410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.060706627 = score(doc=1410,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.24105114 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052875843 = queryNorm
          0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 1410, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1410)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.046363138 = sum of:
    0.010543408 = weight(_text_:d in 1410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010543408 = score(doc=1410,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10045733 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052875843 = queryNorm
        0.104954086 = fieldWeight in 1410, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1410)
    0.03581973 = weight(_text_:22 in 1410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03581973 = score(doc=1410,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18516219 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052875843 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1410, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1410)
    Abstract
    This paper aims to study the conceptual dimension of Knowledge Organization (KO) in the ISKO proceedings (1990-2012) domain. After analyzing a corpus of 71 papers that presented the term "knowledge organization" in their titles, using the methodology of Bardin's content analysis, it was possible to obtain a set of 11 definitions of KO which were studied using the following categories: nature, object, tools, processes, and perspectives/approaches. These categories act as a basis to identify the communities of authors that interact in the domain under different conceptual perspectives. The results show that KO has been mainly understood as an area or field of knowledge whose objects are recorded knowledge and conceptual structures, and whose main processes are classification and indexing, as well as information retrieval. The nature of KO is mostly linked to the construction of specialized discourses and the methodological dimension of such area is related to the systematization of recorded scientific knowledge.
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  14. Hangel, N.; Schmidt-Pfister, D.: Why do you publish? : on the tensions between generating scientific knowledge and publication pressure (2017) 0.06 
    0.061539795 = sum of:
  0.015176657 = product of:
    0.060706627 = sum of:
      0.060706627 = weight(_text_:authors in 4054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.060706627 = score(doc=4054,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.24105114 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052875843 = queryNorm
          0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 4054, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4054)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.046363138 = sum of:
    0.010543408 = weight(_text_:d in 4054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010543408 = score(doc=4054,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10045733 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052875843 = queryNorm
        0.104954086 = fieldWeight in 4054, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4054)
    0.03581973 = weight(_text_:22 in 4054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03581973 = score(doc=4054,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18516219 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052875843 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4054, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4054)
    Abstract
    Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine researchers' motivations to publish by comparing different career stages (PhD students; temporarily employed postdocs/new professors; scholars with permanent employment) with regard to epistemic, pragmatic, and personal motives. Design/methodology/approach This qualitative analysis is mainly based on semi-structured narrative interviews with 91 researchers in the humanities, social, and natural sciences, based at six renowned (anonymous) universities in Germany, the UK, and the USA. These narratives contain answers to the direct question "why do you publish?" as well as remarks on motivations to publish in relation to other questions and themes. The interdisciplinary interpretation is based on both sociological science studies and philosophy of science in practice. Findings At each career stage, epistemic, pragmatic, and personal motivations to publish are weighed differently. Confirming earlier studies, the authors find that PhD students and postdoctoral researchers in temporary positions mainly feel pressured to publish for career-related reasons. However, across status groups, researchers also want to publish in order to support collective knowledge generation. Research limitations/implications The sample of interviewees may be biased toward those interested in reflecting on their day-to-day work. Social implications Continuous and collective reflection is imperative for preventing uncritical internalization of pragmatic reasons to publish. Creating occasions for reflection is a task not only of researchers themselves, but also of administrators, funders, and other stakeholders. Originality/value Most studies have illuminated how researchers publish while adapting to or growing into the contemporary publish-or-perish culture. This paper addresses the rarely asked question why researchers publish at all.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  15. Schöne neue Welt? : Fragen und Antworten: Wie Facebook menschliche Gedanken auslesen will (2017) 0.06 
    0.061200157 = product of:
  0.12240031 = sum of:
    0.12240031 = sum of:
      0.021086816 = weight(_text_:d in 2810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.021086816 = score(doc=2810,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.10045733 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052875843 = queryNorm
          0.20990817 = fieldWeight in 2810, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2810)
      0.1013135 = weight(_text_:22 in 2810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.1013135 = score(doc=2810,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.18516219 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052875843 = queryNorm
          0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 2810, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2810)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 7.2004 9:42:33
    22. 4.2017 11:58:05
    Language
    d
  16. Wolchover, N.: Wie ein Aufsehen erregender Beweis kaum Beachtung fand (2017) 0.06 
    0.061200157 = product of:
  0.12240031 = sum of:
    0.12240031 = sum of:
      0.021086816 = weight(_text_:d in 3582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.021086816 = score(doc=3582,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.10045733 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052875843 = queryNorm
          0.20990817 = fieldWeight in 3582, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3582)
      0.1013135 = weight(_text_:22 in 3582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.1013135 = score(doc=3582,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.18516219 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052875843 = queryNorm
          0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3582, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3582)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 4.2017 10:42:05
    22. 4.2017 10:48:38
    Language
    d
  17. Poscher, R.: ¬Die Zukunft der informationellen Selbstbestimmung als Recht auf Abwehr von Grundrechtsgefährdungen (2012) 0.06 
    0.061200157 = product of:
  0.12240031 = sum of:
    0.12240031 = sum of:
      0.021086816 = weight(_text_:d in 3975) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.021086816 = score(doc=3975,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.10045733 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052875843 = queryNorm
          0.20990817 = fieldWeight in 3975, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3975)
      0.1013135 = weight(_text_:22 in 3975) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.1013135 = score(doc=3975,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.18516219 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052875843 = queryNorm
          0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3975, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3975)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 2.2018 12:06:44
    22. 2.2018 12:13:53
    Language
    d
  18. Röthler, D.: "Lehrautomaten" oder die MOOC-Vision der späten 60er Jahre (2014) 0.06 
    0.060876437 = product of:
  0.12175287 = sum of:
    0.12175287 = sum of:
      0.035785515 = weight(_text_:d in 1552) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.035785515 = score(doc=1552,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.10045733 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052875843 = queryNorm
          0.356226 = fieldWeight in 1552, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1552)
      0.085967354 = weight(_text_:22 in 1552) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.085967354 = score(doc=1552,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18516219 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052875843 = queryNorm
          0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1552, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1552)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 6.2018 11:04:35
    Language
    d
  19. Ceynowa, K.: Research Library Reloaded? : Überlegungen zur Zukunft der geisteswissenschaftlichen Forschungsbibliothek (2018) 0.06 
    0.060876437 = product of:
  0.12175287 = sum of:
    0.12175287 = sum of:
      0.035785515 = weight(_text_:d in 4973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.035785515 = score(doc=4973,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.10045733 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052875843 = queryNorm
          0.356226 = fieldWeight in 4973, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4973)
      0.085967354 = weight(_text_:22 in 4973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.085967354 = score(doc=4973,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18516219 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052875843 = queryNorm
          0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4973, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4973)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    1. 2.2019 12:50:22
    Language
    d
    Location
    D
  20. Shala, E.: ¬Die Autonomie des Menschen und der Maschine : gegenwärtige Definitionen von Autonomie zwischen philosophischem Hintergrund und technologischer Umsetzbarkeit (2014) 0.06 
    0.057759736 = sum of:
  0.052488033 = product of:
    0.20995213 = sum of:
      0.20995213 = weight(_text_:3a in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.20995213 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.44828197 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052875843 = queryNorm
          0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.005271704 = product of:
    0.010543408 = sum of:
      0.010543408 = weight(_text_:d in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.010543408 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.10045733 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052875843 = queryNorm
          0.104954086 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Vgl. unter: https://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwizweHljdbcAhVS16QKHXcFD9QQFjABegQICRAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Fpublication%2F271200105_Die_Autonomie_des_Menschen_und_der_Maschine_-_gegenwartige_Definitionen_von_Autonomie_zwischen_philosophischem_Hintergrund_und_technologischer_Umsetzbarkeit_Redigierte_Version_der_Magisterarbeit_Karls&usg=AOvVaw06orrdJmFF2xbCCp_hL26q.
    Language
    d

Authors

Languages

  • d 1744
  • e 1242
  • a 1
  • f 1
  • hu 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 2462
  • el 493
  • m 290
  • x 78
  • s 74
  • r 26
  • n 8
  • b 7
  • i 2
  • p 2
  • ag 1
  • l 1
  • v 1
  • z 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications