Search (2565 results, page 1 of 129)

0.15419126 = sum of:
  0.07195966 = product of:
    0.28783864 = sum of:
      0.28783864 = weight(_text_:3a in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.28783864 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.43898734 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05177952 = queryNorm
          0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.082231596 = product of:
    0.12334739 = sum of:
      0.08839021 = weight(_text_:k in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08839021 = score(doc=5955,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.1848414 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05177952 = queryNorm
          0.4781949 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
      0.034957174 = weight(_text_:h in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.034957174 = score(doc=5955,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.12864359 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05177952 = queryNorm
          0.27173662 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
    0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Classification

OKH (FH K)

Footnote

Rez. in: Philosophisch-ethische Rezensionen vom 09.11.2019 (Jürgen Czogalla), Unter: https://philosophisch-ethische-rezensionen.de/rezension/Goedert1.html. In: B.I.T. online 23(2020) H.3, S.345-347 (W. Sühl-Strohmenger) [Unter: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.b-i-t-online.de%2Fheft%2F2020-03-rezensionen.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0iY3f_zNcvEjeZ6inHVnOK]. In: Open Password Nr. 805 vom 14.08.2020 (H.-C. Hobohm) [Unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzE0MywiOGI3NjZkZmNkZjQ1IiwwLDAsMTMxLDFd].

GHBS

OKH (FH K)

0.15252061 = sum of:
  0.123359405 = product of:
    0.49343762 = sum of:
      0.49343762 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.49343762 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.43898734 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05177952 = queryNorm
          1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.029161206 = product of:
    0.087483615 = sum of:
      0.087483615 = weight(_text_:k in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.087483615 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1848414 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05177952 = queryNorm
          0.47329018 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Content

Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.

0.10702151 = product of:
  0.21404302 = sum of:
    0.21404302 = sum of:
      0.087483615 = weight(_text_:k in 4248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.087483615 = score(doc=4248,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1848414 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05177952 = queryNorm
          0.47329018 = fieldWeight in 4248, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4248)
      0.04237449 = weight(_text_:h in 4248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04237449 = score(doc=4248,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.12864359 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05177952 = queryNorm
          0.32939452 = fieldWeight in 4248, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4248)
      0.084184915 = weight(_text_:22 in 4248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.084184915 = score(doc=4248,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18132305 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05177952 = queryNorm
          0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4248, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4248)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 2011, H.2, S.22-29

0.10702151 = product of:
  0.21404302 = sum of:
    0.21404302 = sum of:
      0.087483615 = weight(_text_:k in 4973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.087483615 = score(doc=4973,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1848414 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05177952 = queryNorm
          0.47329018 = fieldWeight in 4973, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4973)
      0.04237449 = weight(_text_:h in 4973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04237449 = score(doc=4973,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.12864359 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05177952 = queryNorm
          0.32939452 = fieldWeight in 4973, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4973)
      0.084184915 = weight(_text_:22 in 4973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.084184915 = score(doc=4973,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18132305 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05177952 = queryNorm
          0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4973, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4973)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

1. 2.2019 12:50:22

Source

Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 65(2018) H.1, S.3-7

0.0881129 = sum of:
  0.030890055 = product of:
    0.12356022 = sum of:
      0.12356022 = weight(_text_:authors in 4000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.12356022 = score(doc=4000,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.2360532 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05177952 = queryNorm
          0.52344227 = fieldWeight in 4000, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4000)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.057222843 = product of:
    0.085834265 = sum of:
      0.043741807 = weight(_text_:k in 4000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.043741807 = score(doc=4000,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1848414 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05177952 = queryNorm
          0.23664509 = fieldWeight in 4000, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4000)
      0.042092457 = weight(_text_:22 in 4000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.042092457 = score(doc=4000,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18132305 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05177952 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4000, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4000)
    0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

Author research impact was examined based on citer analysis (the number of citers as opposed to the number of citations) for 90 highly cited authors grouped into three broad subject areas. Citer-based outcome measures were also compared with more traditional citation-based measures for levels of association. The authors found that there are significant differences in citer-based outcomes among the three broad subject areas examined and that there is a high degree of correlation between citer and citation-based measures for all measures compared, except for two outcomes calculated for the social sciences. Citer-based measures do produce slightly different rankings of authors based on citer counts when compared to more traditional citation counts. Examples are provided. Citation measures may not adequately address the influence, or reach, of an author because citations usually do not address the origin of the citation beyond self-citations.

Date

28. 9.2010 12:54:22

0.07319938 = sum of:
  0.017834382 = product of:
    0.07133753 = sum of:
      0.07133753 = weight(_text_:authors in 4457) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07133753 = score(doc=4457,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2360532 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05177952 = queryNorm
          0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 4457, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4457)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.055364996 = product of:
    0.083047494 = sum of:
      0.061860252 = weight(_text_:k in 4457) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.061860252 = score(doc=4457,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.1848414 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05177952 = queryNorm
          0.33466667 = fieldWeight in 4457, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4457)
      0.021187246 = weight(_text_:h in 4457) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.021187246 = score(doc=4457,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.12864359 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05177952 = queryNorm
          0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 4457, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4457)
    0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

With increasing digital information availability, semantic web technologies have been employed to construct semantic digital libraries in order to ease information comprehension. The use of semantic web enables users to search or visualize resources in a semantic fashion. Semantic web generation is a key process in semantic digital library construction, which converts metadata of digital resources into semantic web data. Many text mining technologies, such as keyword extraction and clustering, have been proposed to generate semantic web data. However, one important type of metadata in publications, called affiliation, is hard to convert into semantic web data precisely because different authors, who have the same affiliation, often express the affiliation in different ways. To address this issue, this paper proposes a clustering method based on normalized compression distance for the purpose of affiliation disambiguation. The experimental results show that our method is able to identify different affiliations that denote the same institutes. The clustering results outperform the well-known k-means clustering method in terms of average precision, F-measure, entropy, and purity.

0.071347676 = product of:
  0.14269535 = sum of:
    0.14269535 = sum of:
      0.05832241 = weight(_text_:k in 1715) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05832241 = score(doc=1715,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1848414 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05177952 = queryNorm
          0.31552678 = fieldWeight in 1715, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1715)
      0.028249662 = weight(_text_:h in 1715) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.028249662 = score(doc=1715,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.12864359 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05177952 = queryNorm
          0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 1715, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1715)
      0.05612328 = weight(_text_:22 in 1715) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05612328 = score(doc=1715,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18132305 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05177952 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1715, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1715)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Dialog mit Bibliotheken. 27(2015) H.1, S.18-22

0.06874212 = sum of:
  0.061679702 = product of:
    0.24671881 = sum of:
      0.24671881 = weight(_text_:3a in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.24671881 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.43898734 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05177952 = queryNorm
          0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.0070624156 = product of:
    0.021187246 = sum of:
      0.021187246 = weight(_text_:h in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.021187246 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.12864359 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05177952 = queryNorm
          0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Footnote

https%3A%2F%2Fjournals.univie.ac.at%2Findex.php%2Fvoebm%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F5332%2F5271%2F&usg=AOvVaw2yQdFGHlmOwVls7ANCpTii.

Source

Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. 73(2020) H.3/4, S.496-503

0.06579567 = sum of:
  0.02972397 = product of:
    0.11889588 = sum of:
      0.11889588 = weight(_text_:authors in 4370) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11889588 = score(doc=4370,freq=8.0), product of:
          0.2360532 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05177952 = queryNorm
          0.50368255 = fieldWeight in 4370, product of:
            2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
              8.0 = termFreq=8.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4370)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.036071695 = product of:
    0.054107543 = sum of:
      0.036451504 = weight(_text_:k in 4370) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.036451504 = score(doc=4370,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1848414 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05177952 = queryNorm
          0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 4370, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4370)
      0.01765604 = weight(_text_:h in 4370) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.01765604 = score(doc=4370,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.12864359 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05177952 = queryNorm
          0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 4370, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4370)
    0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

This paper proposes a methodology which discriminates the articles by the target authors ("true" articles) from those by other homonymous authors ("false" articles). Author name searches for 2,595 "source" authors in six subject fields retrieved about 629,000 articles. In order to extract true articles from the large amount of the retrieved articles, including many false ones, two filtering stages were applied. At the first stage any retrieved article was eliminated as false if either its affiliation addresses had little similarity to those of its source article or there was no citation relationship between the journal of the retrieved article and that of its source article. At the second stage, a sample of retrieved articles was subjected to manual judgment, and utilizing the judgment results, discrimination functions based on logistic regression were defined. These discrimination functions demonstrated both the recall ratio and the precision of about 95% and the accuracy (correct answer ratio) of 90-95%. Existence of common coauthor(s), address similarity, title words similarity, and interjournal citation relationships between the retrieved and source articles were found to be the effective discrimination predictors. Whether or not the source author was from a specific country was also one of the important predictors. Furthermore, it was shown that a retrieved article is almost certainly true if it was cited by, or cocited with, its source article. The method proposed in this study would be effective when dealing with a large number of articles whose subject fields and affiliation addresses vary widely.

0.062569976 = product of:
  0.12513995 = sum of:
    0.12513995 = sum of:
      0.061860252 = weight(_text_:k in 1029) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.061860252 = score(doc=1029,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.1848414 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05177952 = queryNorm
          0.33466667 = fieldWeight in 1029, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1029)
      0.021187246 = weight(_text_:h in 1029) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.021187246 = score(doc=1029,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.12864359 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05177952 = queryNorm
          0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 1029, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1029)
      0.042092457 = weight(_text_:22 in 1029) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.042092457 = score(doc=1029,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18132305 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05177952 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1029, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1029)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Classification

ANW (FH K)

Date

19.12.2015 11:57:22

Editor

Ludwig, J. u. H. Enke

GHBS

ANW (FH K)

0.06254769 = sum of:
  0.014861985 = product of:
    0.05944794 = sum of:
      0.05944794 = weight(_text_:authors in 3070) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05944794 = score(doc=3070,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2360532 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05177952 = queryNorm
          0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 3070, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3070)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.047685705 = product of:
    0.071528554 = sum of:
      0.036451504 = weight(_text_:k in 3070) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.036451504 = score(doc=3070,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1848414 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05177952 = queryNorm
          0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 3070, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3070)
      0.03507705 = weight(_text_:22 in 3070) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03507705 = score(doc=3070,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18132305 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05177952 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3070, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3070)
    0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to investigate user experiences with a touch-wall interface featuring both clustering and categorization representations of available e-books in a public library to understand human information interactions under work-focused and recreational contexts. Design/methodology/approach - Researchers collected questionnaires from 251 New Taipei City Library visitors who used the touch-wall interface to search for new titles. The authors applied structural equation modelling to examine relationships among hedonic/utilitarian needs, clustering and categorization representations, perceived ease of use (EU) and the extent to which users experienced anxiety and uncertainty (AU) while interacting with the interface. Findings - Utilitarian users who have an explicit idea of what they intend to find tend to prefer the categorization interface. A hedonic-oriented user tends to prefer clustering interfaces. Users reported EU regardless of which interface they engaged with. Results revealed that use of the clustering interface had a negative correlation with AU. Users that seek to satisfy utilitarian needs tended to emphasize the importance of perceived EU, whilst pleasure-seeking users were a little more tolerant of anxiety or uncertainty. Originality/value - The Online Public Access Catalogue (OPAC) encourages library visitors to borrow digital books through the implementation of an information visualization system. This situation poses an opportunity to validate uses and gratification theory. People with hedonic/utilitarian needs displayed different risk-control attitudes and affected uncertainty using the interface. Knowledge about user interaction with such interfaces is vital when launching the development of a new OPAC.

Date

20. 1.2015 18:30:22

0.05789878 = product of:
  0.11579756 = sum of:
    0.11579756 = sum of:
      0.043741807 = weight(_text_:k in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.043741807 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1848414 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05177952 = queryNorm
          0.23664509 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
      0.029963292 = weight(_text_:h in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.029963292 = score(doc=402,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.12864359 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05177952 = queryNorm
          0.2329171 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
      0.042092457 = weight(_text_:22 in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.042092457 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18132305 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05177952 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 7.2012 19:35:26

Footnote

Besteht aus 4 Teilen: Teil 1: Eden, D., A. Arndt, A. Hoffer, T. Raschke u. P. Schön: Die Nachrichten für Dokumentation in den Jahren 1950 bis 1962 (S.159-163). Teil 2: Brose, M., E. durst, D. Nitzsche, D. Veckenstedt u. R. Wein: Statistische Untersuchung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) 1963-1975 (S.164-170). Teil 3: Bösel, J., G. Ebert, P. Garz,, M. Iwanow u. B. Russ: Methoden und Ergebnisse einer statistischen Auswertung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) 1976 bis 1988 (S.171-174). Teil 4: Engelage, H., S. Jansen, R. Mertins, K. Redel u. S. Ring: Statistische Untersuchung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) / "Information. Wissenschaft & Praxis" (IWP) 1989-2011 (S.164-170).

Source

Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 63(2012) H.3, S.157-182

0.056173414 = sum of:
  0.02101802 = product of:
    0.08407208 = sum of:
      0.08407208 = weight(_text_:authors in 4959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08407208 = score(doc=4959,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.2360532 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05177952 = queryNorm
          0.35615736 = fieldWeight in 4959, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4959)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.035155393 = product of:
    0.05273309 = sum of:
      0.01765604 = weight(_text_:h in 4959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.01765604 = score(doc=4959,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.12864359 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05177952 = queryNorm
          0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 4959, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4959)
      0.03507705 = weight(_text_:22 in 4959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03507705 = score(doc=4959,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18132305 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05177952 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4959, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4959)
    0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

This study uses three bibliometric methods: direct citation, bibliographic coupling, and co-authorship analysis, to investigate interdisciplinary changes in library and information science (LIS) from 1978 to 2007. The results reveal that LIS researchers most frequently cite publications in their own discipline. In addition, half of all co-authors of LIS articles are affiliated with LIS-related institutes. The results confirm that the degree of interdisciplinarity within LIS has increased, particularly co-authorship. However, the study found sources of direct citations in LIS articles are widely distributed across 30 disciplines, but co-authors of LIS articles are distributed across only 25 disciplines. The degree of interdisciplinarity was found ranging from 0.61 to 0.82 with citation to references in all articles being the highest and that of co-authorship being the lowest. Percentages of contribution attributable to LIS show a decreasing tendency based on the results of direct citation and co-authorship analysis, but an increasing tendency based on those of bibliographic coupling analysis. Such differences indicate each of the three bibliometric methods has its strength and provides insights respectively for viewing various aspects of interdisciplinarity, suggesting the use of no single bibliometric method can reveal all aspects of interdisciplinarity due to its multifaceted nature.

Source

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.1, S.22-33

0.053728394 = sum of:
  0.04203604 = product of:
    0.16814417 = sum of:
      0.16814417 = weight(_text_:authors in 4150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.16814417 = score(doc=4150,freq=16.0), product of:
          0.2360532 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05177952 = queryNorm
          0.7123147 = fieldWeight in 4150, product of:
            4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
              16.0 = termFreq=16.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4150)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.011692351 = product of:
    0.03507705 = sum of:
      0.03507705 = weight(_text_:22 in 4150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03507705 = score(doc=4150,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18132305 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05177952 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4150, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4150)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

The domain of knowledge organization (KO) represents a foundational area of information science. One way to better understand the intellectual structure of the KO domain is to apply bibliometric methods to key contributors to the literature. This study analyzes the most prolific contributing authors to the journal Knowledge Organization, the sources they cite and the citations they receive for the period 1993 to 2016. The analyses were conducted using visualization outcomes of citation, co-citation and author bibliographic coupling analysis to reveal theoretical points of reference among authors and the most prominent research themes that constitute this scientific community. Birger Hjørland was the most cited author, and was situated at or near the middle of each of the maps based on different citation relationships. The proximities between authors resulting from the different citation relationships demonstrate how authors situate themselves intellectually through the citations they give and how other authors situate them through the citations received. There is a consistent core of theoretical references as well among the most productive authors. We observed a close network of scholarly communication between the authors cited in this core, which indicates the actual role of the journal Knowledge Organization as a space for knowledge construction in the area of knowledge organization.

Source

Knowledge organization. 45(2018) no.1, S.13-22

0.051399752 = product of:
  0.102799505 = sum of:
    0.102799505 = product of:
      0.41119802 = sum of:
        0.41119802 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.41119802 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.43898734 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05177952 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja

0.050500378 = product of:
  0.101000756 = sum of:
    0.101000756 = product of:
      0.15150113 = sum of:
        0.10206422 = weight(_text_:k in 961) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10206422 = score(doc=961,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1848414 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05177952 = queryNorm
            0.5521719 = fieldWeight in 961, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=961)
        0.04943691 = weight(_text_:h in 961) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04943691 = score(doc=961,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12864359 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05177952 = queryNorm
            0.38429362 = fieldWeight in 961, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=961)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 66(2015) H.2/3, S.99-101

0.04829816 = product of:
  0.09659632 = sum of:
    0.09659632 = product of:
      0.14489448 = sum of:
        0.11664482 = weight(_text_:k in 4089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11664482 = score(doc=4089,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.1848414 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05177952 = queryNorm
            0.63105357 = fieldWeight in 4089, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4089)
        0.028249662 = weight(_text_:h in 4089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028249662 = score(doc=4089,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12864359 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05177952 = queryNorm
            0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 4089, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4089)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

"Die Bibliotheken in den neuen Bundesländern warten bereits sehnsüchtig darauf jetzt ist sie da: die neue KAB-K! Druckfrisch kann die Ausgabe bei der ekz.bibliotheksser vice GmbH in Reutlingen für 14,90 Euro erworben werden (E-Mail Medien. Verkauf@ekz.de). Dort findet die KAB-K auch schon seit Beginn des Jahres Anwendung. Alle ab ID 1/10 veröffentlichten Titel werden danach systematisiert. Bereits früher veröffentlichte Titel können nicht umsystematisiert werden. Inhaltliche Fragen zur neuen KAB-K beantwortet das Team Systematisierung: Ute Kaptein, Telefon 0 71 21/144-161.

Object

KAB-K

Source

BuB. 62(2010) H.9, S.588

0.048096627 = sum of:
  0.036404274 = product of:
    0.1456171 = sum of:
      0.1456171 = weight(_text_:authors in 823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.1456171 = score(doc=823,freq=12.0), product of:
          0.2360532 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05177952 = queryNorm
          0.61688256 = fieldWeight in 823, product of:
            3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
              12.0 = termFreq=12.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=823)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.011692351 = product of:
    0.03507705 = sum of:
      0.03507705 = weight(_text_:22 in 823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03507705 = score(doc=823,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18132305 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05177952 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 823, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=823)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Aiming at contributing to the epistemological characterization of the area of knowledge organization, our goal is to analyze the KO journal, since its creation in 1993, as a knowledge domain, from a nuclear community of the most productive and greater impact authors, analyzing the dialogue among citing authors and cited ones, and also the co-citations established by the citing authors. We worked with a corpus of 310 articles published between 1993 and 2011 produced by a total of 360 authors. The relatively more productive authors, a group geographically concentrated in Europe (37%), North America (44%) and Asia (19%), is clearly explained by the historical European origin of the ISKO and by an increasing North American presence along the years. Of the 33 most cited authors, 22 were co-cited in at least 6 works, which suggests that they are the theoretical referential nucleus of the area, in the studied journal. Finally, we observe that the area reveals theme cohesion and coherence in its production, enabling us to clearly visualize its theoretical referential nucleus and to confirm the role performed by the KO magazine as a catalyzing agent of international theoretical construction in the area.

0.04643593 = sum of:
  0.029425228 = product of:
    0.11770091 = sum of:
      0.11770091 = weight(_text_:authors in 1933) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11770091 = score(doc=1933,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.2360532 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05177952 = queryNorm
          0.49862027 = fieldWeight in 1933, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1933)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.017010704 = product of:
    0.05103211 = sum of:
      0.05103211 = weight(_text_:k in 1933) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05103211 = score(doc=1933,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1848414 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05177952 = queryNorm
          0.27608594 = fieldWeight in 1933, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1933)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

This article provides a background for the change of the classification system for Chinese language materials at an academic library. It describes how the decision was made; how choices on partial reclassification or total reclassification were made; and how matters such as project planning, implementation, and vision for the future are being handled. It is hoped that the authors' experience can offer tips for other libraries contemplating reclassification projects. By making use of the Chinese Library Classification (CLC) numbers from various sources in Mainland China, the authors envisage increased cataloging efficiency and cost saving in the long run.

0.045794517 = sum of:
  0.029425228 = product of:
    0.11770091 = sum of:
      0.11770091 = weight(_text_:authors in 2600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11770091 = score(doc=2600,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.2360532 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05177952 = queryNorm
          0.49862027 = fieldWeight in 2600, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2600)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.01636929 = product of:
    0.04910787 = sum of:
      0.04910787 = weight(_text_:22 in 2600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04910787 = score(doc=2600,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18132305 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05177952 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2600, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2600)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Research libraries are using batchloading to provide access to many resources that they would otherwise be unable to catalog given the staff and other resources available. To explore how such libraries are managing their batchloading activities, the authors conducted a survey of the Association for Library Collections and Technical Services Directors of Large Research Libraries Interest Group member libraries. The survey addressed staffing, budgets, scope, workflow, management, quality standards, information technology support, collaborative efforts, and assessment of batchloading activities. The authors provide an analysis of the survey results along with suggestions for process improvements and future research.

Date

10. 9.2000 17:38:22