Search (5894 results, page 1 of 295)

  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Soergel, D.: Knowledge organization for learning (2014) 0.10 
    0.10017557 = sum of:
  0.021315364 = product of:
    0.08526146 = sum of:
      0.08526146 = weight(_text_:authors in 1400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08526146 = score(doc=1400,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.24182312 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.053045183 = queryNorm
          0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 1400, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1400)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.0788602 = sum of:
    0.0077136164 = weight(_text_:a in 1400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0077136164 = score(doc=1400,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06116359 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.053045183 = queryNorm
        0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 1400, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1400)
    0.071146585 = weight(_text_:22 in 1400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.071146585 = score(doc=1400,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.1857552 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.053045183 = queryNorm
        0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 1400, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1400)
    Abstract
    This paper discusses and illustrates through examples how meaningful or deep learning can be supported through well-structured presentation of material, through giving learners schemas they can use to organize knowledge in their minds, and through helping learners to understand knowledge organization principles they can use to construct their own schemas. It is a call to all authors, educators and information designers to pay attention to meaningful presentation that expresses the internal structure of the domain and facilitates the learner's assimilation of concepts and their relationships.
    Pages
    S.22-32
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
    Type
    a
  2. Mitchell, J.S.; Zeng, M.L.; Zumer, M.: Modeling classification systems in multicultural and multilingual contexts (2012) 0.09 
    0.093432575 = sum of:
  0.025838124 = product of:
    0.103352495 = sum of:
      0.103352495 = weight(_text_:authors in 1967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.103352495 = score(doc=1967,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.24182312 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.053045183 = queryNorm
          0.42738882 = fieldWeight in 1967, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1967)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.06759445 = sum of:
    0.006611671 = weight(_text_:a in 1967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006611671 = score(doc=1967,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06116359 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.053045183 = queryNorm
        0.10809815 = fieldWeight in 1967, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1967)
    0.060982786 = weight(_text_:22 in 1967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.060982786 = score(doc=1967,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.1857552 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.053045183 = queryNorm
        0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 1967, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1967)
    Abstract
    This paper reports on the second part of an initiative of the authors on researching classification systems with the conceptual model defined by the Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD) final report. In an earlier study, the authors explored whether the FRSAD conceptual model could be extended beyond subject authority data to model classification data. The focus of the current study is to determine if classification data modeled using FRSAD can be used to solve real-world discovery problems in multicultural and multilingual contexts. The paper discusses the relationships between entities (same type or different types) in the context of classification systems that involve multiple translations and /or multicultural implementations. Results of two case studies are presented in detail: (a) two instances of the DDC (DDC 22 in English, and the Swedish-English mixed translation of DDC 22), and (b) Chinese Library Classification. The use cases of conceptual models in practice are also discussed.
    Type
    a
  3. Pepermans, G.; Rousseau, S.: ¬The decision to submit to a journal : another example of a valence-consistent shift? (2016) 0.09 
    0.0895506 = sum of:
  0.03164511 = product of:
    0.12658045 = sum of:
      0.12658045 = weight(_text_:authors in 2925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.12658045 = score(doc=2925,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.24182312 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.053045183 = queryNorm
          0.52344227 = fieldWeight in 2925, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2925)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.057905484 = sum of:
    0.014784146 = weight(_text_:a in 2925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014784146 = score(doc=2925,freq=20.0), product of:
        0.06116359 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.053045183 = queryNorm
        0.24171482 = fieldWeight in 2925, product of:
          4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
            20.0 = termFreq=20.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2925)
    0.043121338 = weight(_text_:22 in 2925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.043121338 = score(doc=2925,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1857552 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.053045183 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2925, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2925)
    Abstract
    In this article we use a stated choice experiment to study researcher preferences in the information sciences and to investigate the relative importance of different journal characteristics in convincing potential authors to submit to a particular journal. The analysis distinguishes high quality from standard quality articles and focuses on the question whether communicating acceptance rates rather than rejection rates leads to other submission decisions. Our results show that a positive framing effect might be present when authors decide on submitting a high quality article. No evidence of a framing effect is found when authors consider a standard quality article. From a journal marketing perspective, this is important information for editors. Communicating acceptance rates rather than rejection rates might help to convince researchers to submit to their journal.
    Date
    7. 5.2016 20:02:22
    Type
    a
  4. Castanha, R.C.G.; Wolfram, D.: ¬The domain of knowledge organization : a bibliometric analysis of prolific authors and their intellectual space (2018) 0.09 
    0.08854112 = sum of:
  0.043063544 = product of:
    0.17225417 = sum of:
      0.17225417 = weight(_text_:authors in 4150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.17225417 = score(doc=4150,freq=16.0), product of:
          0.24182312 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.053045183 = queryNorm
          0.7123147 = fieldWeight in 4150, product of:
            4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
              16.0 = termFreq=16.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4150)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.045477577 = sum of:
    0.0095431255 = weight(_text_:a in 4150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0095431255 = score(doc=4150,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.06116359 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.053045183 = queryNorm
        0.15602624 = fieldWeight in 4150, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4150)
    0.035934452 = weight(_text_:22 in 4150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.035934452 = score(doc=4150,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1857552 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.053045183 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4150, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4150)
    Abstract
    The domain of knowledge organization (KO) represents a foundational area of information science. One way to better understand the intellectual structure of the KO domain is to apply bibliometric methods to key contributors to the literature. This study analyzes the most prolific contributing authors to the journal Knowledge Organization, the sources they cite and the citations they receive for the period 1993 to 2016. The analyses were conducted using visualization outcomes of citation, co-citation and author bibliographic coupling analysis to reveal theoretical points of reference among authors and the most prominent research themes that constitute this scientific community. Birger Hjørland was the most cited author, and was situated at or near the middle of each of the maps based on different citation relationships. The proximities between authors resulting from the different citation relationships demonstrate how authors situate themselves intellectually through the citations they give and how other authors situate them through the citations received. There is a consistent core of theoretical references as well among the most productive authors. We observed a close network of scholarly communication between the authors cited in this core, which indicates the actual role of the journal Knowledge Organization as a space for knowledge construction in the area of knowledge organization.
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 45(2018) no.1, S.13-22
    Type
    a
  5. Mugridge, R.L.; Edmunds, J.: Batchloading MARC bibliographic records (2012) 0.09 
    0.08816633 = sum of:
  0.030144477 = product of:
    0.12057791 = sum of:
      0.12057791 = weight(_text_:authors in 2600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.12057791 = score(doc=2600,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.24182312 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.053045183 = queryNorm
          0.49862027 = fieldWeight in 2600, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2600)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.058021847 = sum of:
    0.0077136164 = weight(_text_:a in 2600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0077136164 = score(doc=2600,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06116359 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.053045183 = queryNorm
        0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 2600, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2600)
    0.05030823 = weight(_text_:22 in 2600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05030823 = score(doc=2600,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1857552 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.053045183 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2600, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2600)
    Abstract
    Research libraries are using batchloading to provide access to many resources that they would otherwise be unable to catalog given the staff and other resources available. To explore how such libraries are managing their batchloading activities, the authors conducted a survey of the Association for Library Collections and Technical Services Directors of Large Research Libraries Interest Group member libraries. The survey addressed staffing, budgets, scope, workflow, management, quality standards, information technology support, collaborative efforts, and assessment of batchloading activities. The authors provide an analysis of the survey results along with suggestions for process improvements and future research.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Type
    a
  6. Zhu, Q.; Kong, X.; Hong, S.; Li, J.; He, Z.: Global ontology research progress : a bibliometric analysis (2015) 0.09 
    0.08590156 = sum of:
  0.026370928 = product of:
    0.10548371 = sum of:
      0.10548371 = weight(_text_:authors in 2590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.10548371 = score(doc=2590,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.24182312 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.053045183 = queryNorm
          0.43620193 = fieldWeight in 2590, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2590)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.05953063 = sum of:
    0.008711642 = weight(_text_:a in 2590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008711642 = score(doc=2590,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.06116359 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.053045183 = queryNorm
        0.14243183 = fieldWeight in 2590, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2590)
    0.050818987 = weight(_text_:22 in 2590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.050818987 = score(doc=2590,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.1857552 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.053045183 = queryNorm
        0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2590, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2590)
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to analyse the global scientific outputs of ontology research, an important emerging discipline that has huge potential to improve information understanding, organization, and management. Design/methodology/approach - This study collected literature published during 1900-2012 from the Web of Science database. The bibliometric analysis was performed from authorial, institutional, national, spatiotemporal, and topical aspects. Basic statistical analysis, visualization of geographic distribution, co-word analysis, and a new index were applied to the selected data. Findings - Characteristics of publication outputs suggested that ontology research has entered into the soaring stage, along with increased participation and collaboration. The authors identified the leading authors, institutions, nations, and articles in ontology research. Authors were more from North America, Europe, and East Asia. The USA took the lead, while China grew fastest. Four major categories of frequently used keywords were identified: applications in Semantic Web, applications in bioinformatics, philosophy theories, and common supporting technology. Semantic Web research played a core role, and gene ontology study was well-developed. The study focus of ontology has shifted from philosophy to information science. Originality/value - This is the first study to quantify global research patterns and trends in ontology, which might provide a potential guide for the future research. The new index provides an alternative way to evaluate the multidisciplinary influence of researchers.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    17. 9.2018 18:22:23
    Type
    a
  7. Chaves Guimarães, J.A.; Oliveira, E.T. de; Cabrini Gracio, M.C.: Theoretical referents in Knowledge Organization : a domain analysis of the Knowledge Organization journal (2012) 0.08 
    0.08491646 = sum of:
  0.037294116 = product of:
    0.14917646 = sum of:
      0.14917646 = weight(_text_:authors in 823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.14917646 = score(doc=823,freq=12.0), product of:
          0.24182312 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.053045183 = queryNorm
          0.61688256 = fieldWeight in 823, product of:
            3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
              12.0 = termFreq=12.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=823)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.047622345 = sum of:
    0.011687893 = weight(_text_:a in 823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011687893 = score(doc=823,freq=18.0), product of:
        0.06116359 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.053045183 = queryNorm
        0.19109234 = fieldWeight in 823, product of:
          4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
            18.0 = termFreq=18.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=823)
    0.035934452 = weight(_text_:22 in 823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.035934452 = score(doc=823,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1857552 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.053045183 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 823, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=823)
    Abstract
    Aiming at contributing to the epistemological characterization of the area of knowledge organization, our goal is to analyze the KO journal, since its creation in 1993, as a knowledge domain, from a nuclear community of the most productive and greater impact authors, analyzing the dialogue among citing authors and cited ones, and also the co-citations established by the citing authors. We worked with a corpus of 310 articles published between 1993 and 2011 produced by a total of 360 authors. The relatively more productive authors, a group geographically concentrated in Europe (37%), North America (44%) and Asia (19%), is clearly explained by the historical European origin of the ISKO and by an increasing North American presence along the years. Of the 33 most cited authors, 22 were co-cited in at least 6 works, which suggests that they are the theoretical referential nucleus of the area, in the studied journal. Finally, we observe that the area reveals theme cohesion and coherence in its production, enabling us to clearly visualize its theoretical referential nucleus and to confirm the role performed by the KO magazine as a catalyzing agent of international theoretical construction in the area.
    Source
    Categories, contexts and relations in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the Twelfth International ISKO Conference 6-9 August 2012, Mysore, India. Eds.: Neelameghan, A. u. K.S. Raghavan
    Type
    a
  8. Ajiferuke, I.; Lu, K.; Wolfram, D.: ¬A comparison of citer and citation-based measure outcomes for multiple disciplines (2010) 0.08 
    0.08286406 = sum of:
  0.03164511 = product of:
    0.12658045 = sum of:
      0.12658045 = weight(_text_:authors in 4000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.12658045 = score(doc=4000,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.24182312 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.053045183 = queryNorm
          0.52344227 = fieldWeight in 4000, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4000)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.05121895 = sum of:
    0.00809761 = weight(_text_:a in 4000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00809761 = score(doc=4000,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.06116359 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.053045183 = queryNorm
        0.13239266 = fieldWeight in 4000, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4000)
    0.043121338 = weight(_text_:22 in 4000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.043121338 = score(doc=4000,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1857552 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.053045183 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4000, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4000)
    Abstract
    Author research impact was examined based on citer analysis (the number of citers as opposed to the number of citations) for 90 highly cited authors grouped into three broad subject areas. Citer-based outcome measures were also compared with more traditional citation-based measures for levels of association. The authors found that there are significant differences in citer-based outcomes among the three broad subject areas examined and that there is a high degree of correlation between citer and citation-based measures for all measures compared, except for two outcomes calculated for the social sciences. Citer-based measures do produce slightly different rankings of authors based on citer counts when compared to more traditional citation counts. Examples are provided. Citation measures may not adequately address the influence, or reach, of an author because citations usually do not address the origin of the citation beyond self-citations.
    Date
    28. 9.2010 12:54:22
    Type
    a
  9. Moneda Corrochano, M. de la; López-Huertas, M.J.; Jiménez-Contreras, E.: Spanish research in knowledge organization (2002-2010) (2013) 0.08 
    0.082532294 = sum of:
  0.021315364 = product of:
    0.08526146 = sum of:
      0.08526146 = weight(_text_:authors in 3363) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08526146 = score(doc=3363,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.24182312 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.053045183 = queryNorm
          0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 3363, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3363)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.06121693 = sum of:
    0.0109087005 = weight(_text_:a in 3363) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0109087005 = score(doc=3363,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.06116359 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.053045183 = queryNorm
        0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 3363, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3363)
    0.05030823 = weight(_text_:22 in 3363) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05030823 = score(doc=3363,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1857552 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.053045183 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3363, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3363)
    Abstract
    This study analyzes Spanish research on Knowledge Organization from 2002 to 2010. The first stage involved extraction of records from national and international databases that were interrogated. After getting the pertinent records, they we re normalized and processed according to the usual bibliometric procedure. The results point to a mature specialty follow ing the path of the past decade. There is a remarkable increase of male vs. female authors per publication, although the gender gap is not big. It is also evident that ther e is a remarkable internationalization in publication and that the content map of the specialty is more varied than in the previous decade.
    Date
    22. 2.2013 12:10:07
    Type
    a
  10. Salaba, A.; Zeng, M.L.: Extending the "Explore" user task beyond subject authority data into the linked data sphere (2014) 0.08 
    0.08107081 = sum of:
  0.021315364 = product of:
    0.08526146 = sum of:
      0.08526146 = weight(_text_:authors in 1465) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08526146 = score(doc=1465,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.24182312 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.053045183 = queryNorm
          0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 1465, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1465)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.059755445 = sum of:
    0.009447212 = weight(_text_:a in 1465) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009447212 = score(doc=1465,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.06116359 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.053045183 = queryNorm
        0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 1465, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1465)
    0.05030823 = weight(_text_:22 in 1465) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05030823 = score(doc=1465,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1857552 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.053045183 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1465, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1465)
    Abstract
    "Explore" is a user task introduced in the Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD) final report. Through various case scenarios, the authors discuss how structured data, presented based on Linked Data principles and using knowledge organisation systems (KOS) as the backbone, extend the explore task within and beyond subject authority data.
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
    Type
    a
  11. Frâncu, V.; Sabo, C.-N.: Implementation of a UDC-based multilingual thesaurus in a library catalogue : the case of BiblioPhil (2010) 0.08 
    0.08041121 = sum of:
  0.025838124 = product of:
    0.103352495 = sum of:
      0.103352495 = weight(_text_:authors in 3697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.103352495 = score(doc=3697,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.24182312 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.053045183 = queryNorm
          0.42738882 = fieldWeight in 3697, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3697)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.05457309 = sum of:
    0.011451749 = weight(_text_:a in 3697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011451749 = score(doc=3697,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.06116359 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.053045183 = queryNorm
        0.18723148 = fieldWeight in 3697, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3697)
    0.043121338 = weight(_text_:22 in 3697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.043121338 = score(doc=3697,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1857552 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.053045183 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3697, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3697)
    Abstract
    In order to enhance the use of Universal Decimal Classification (UDC) numbers in information retrieval, the authors have represented classification with multilingual thesaurus descriptors and implemented this solution in an automated way. The authors illustrate a solution implemented in a BiblioPhil library system. The standard formats used are UNIMARC for subject authority records (i.e. the UDC-based multilingual thesaurus) and MARC XML support for data transfer. The multilingual thesaurus was built according to existing standards, the constituent parts of the classification notations being used as the basis for search terms in the multilingual information retrieval. The verbal equivalents, descriptors and non-descriptors, are used to expand the number of concepts and are given in Romanian, English and French. This approach saves the time of the indexer and provides more user-friendly and easier access to the bibliographic information. The multilingual aspect of the thesaurus enhances information access for a greater number of online users
    Date
    22. 7.2010 20:40:56
    Type
    a
  12. Pertile, S. de L.; Moreira, V.P.: Comparing and combining content- and citation-based approaches for plagiarism detection (2016) 0.08 
    0.08041121 = sum of:
  0.025838124 = product of:
    0.103352495 = sum of:
      0.103352495 = weight(_text_:authors in 3123) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.103352495 = score(doc=3123,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.24182312 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.053045183 = queryNorm
          0.42738882 = fieldWeight in 3123, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3123)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.05457309 = sum of:
    0.011451749 = weight(_text_:a in 3123) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011451749 = score(doc=3123,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.06116359 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.053045183 = queryNorm
        0.18723148 = fieldWeight in 3123, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3123)
    0.043121338 = weight(_text_:22 in 3123) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.043121338 = score(doc=3123,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1857552 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.053045183 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3123, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3123)
    Abstract
    The vast amount of scientific publications available online makes it easier for students and researchers to reuse text from other authors and makes it harder for checking the originality of a given text. Reusing text without crediting the original authors is considered plagiarism. A number of studies have reported the prevalence of plagiarism in academia. As a consequence, numerous institutions and researchers are dedicated to devising systems to automate the process of checking for plagiarism. This work focuses on the problem of detecting text reuse in scientific papers. The contributions of this paper are twofold: (a) we survey the existing approaches for plagiarism detection based on content, based on content and structure, and based on citations and references; and (b) we compare content and citation-based approaches with the goal of evaluating whether they are complementary and if their combination can improve the quality of the detection. We carry out experiments with real data sets of scientific papers and concluded that a combination of the methods can be beneficial.
    Date
    20. 9.2016 19:51:22
    Type
    a
  13. Mitchell, J.S.; Zeng, M.L.; Zumer, M.: Modeling classification systems in multicultural and multilingual contexts (2014) 0.08 
    0.07909877 = sum of:
  0.021531772 = product of:
    0.08612709 = sum of:
      0.08612709 = weight(_text_:authors in 1962) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08612709 = score(doc=1962,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.24182312 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.053045183 = queryNorm
          0.35615736 = fieldWeight in 1962, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1962)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.057566997 = sum of:
    0.006748009 = weight(_text_:a in 1962) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006748009 = score(doc=1962,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.06116359 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.053045183 = queryNorm
        0.11032722 = fieldWeight in 1962, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1962)
    0.050818987 = weight(_text_:22 in 1962) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.050818987 = score(doc=1962,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.1857552 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.053045183 = queryNorm
        0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 1962, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1962)
    Abstract
    This article reports on the second part of an initiative of the authors on researching classification systems with the conceptual model defined by the Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD) final report. In an earlier study, the authors explored whether the FRSAD conceptual model could be extended beyond subject authority data to model classification data. The focus of the current study is to determine if classification data modeled using FRSAD can be used to solve real-world discovery problems in multicultural and multilingual contexts. The article discusses the relationships between entities (same type or different types) in the context of classification systems that involve multiple translations and/or multicultural implementations. Results of two case studies are presented in detail: (a) two instances of the Dewey Decimal Classification [DDC] (DDC 22 in English, and the Swedish-English mixed translation of DDC 22), and (b) Chinese Library Classification. The use cases of conceptual models in practice are also discussed.
    Footnote
    Contribution in a special issue "Beyond libraries: Subject metadata in the digital environment and Semantic Web" - Enthält Beiträge der gleichnamigen IFLA Satellite Post-Conference, 17-18 August 2012, Tallinn.
    Type
    a
  14. Lewandowski, D.; Sünkler, S.: What does Google recommend when you want to compare insurance offerings? (2019) 0.08 
    0.07669273 = sum of:
  0.030450521 = product of:
    0.121802084 = sum of:
      0.121802084 = weight(_text_:authors in 5288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.121802084 = score(doc=5288,freq=8.0), product of:
          0.24182312 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.053045183 = queryNorm
          0.50368255 = fieldWeight in 5288, product of:
            2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
              8.0 = termFreq=8.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5288)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.046242207 = sum of:
    0.010307753 = weight(_text_:a in 5288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010307753 = score(doc=5288,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.06116359 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.053045183 = queryNorm
        0.1685276 = fieldWeight in 5288, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5288)
    0.035934452 = weight(_text_:22 in 5288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.035934452 = score(doc=5288,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1857552 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.053045183 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5288, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5288)
    Abstract
    Purpose The purpose of this paper is to describe a new method to improve the analysis of search engine results by considering the provider level as well as the domain level. This approach is tested by conducting a study using queries on the topic of insurance comparisons. Design/methodology/approach The authors conducted an empirical study that analyses the results of search queries aimed at comparing insurance companies. The authors used a self-developed software system that automatically queries commercial search engines and automatically extracts the content of the returned result pages for further data analysis. The data analysis was carried out using the KNIME Analytics Platform. Findings Google's top search results are served by only a few providers that frequently appear in these results. The authors show that some providers operate several domains on the same topic and that these domains appear for the same queries in the result lists. Research limitations/implications The authors demonstrate the feasibility of this approach and draw conclusions for further investigations from the empirical study. However, the study is a limited use case based on a limited number of search queries. Originality/value The proposed method allows large-scale analysis of the composition of the top results from commercial search engines. It allows using valid empirical data to determine what users actually see on the search engine result pages.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    Type
    a
  15. Giannella, C.: ¬An improved algorithm for unsupervised decomposition of a multi-author document (2016) 0.08 
    0.076175794 = sum of:
  0.018270312 = product of:
    0.07308125 = sum of:
      0.07308125 = weight(_text_:authors in 2642) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07308125 = score(doc=2642,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.24182312 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.053045183 = queryNorm
          0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 2642, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2642)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.057905484 = sum of:
    0.014784146 = weight(_text_:a in 2642) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014784146 = score(doc=2642,freq=20.0), product of:
        0.06116359 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.053045183 = queryNorm
        0.24171482 = fieldWeight in 2642, product of:
          4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
            20.0 = termFreq=20.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2642)
    0.043121338 = weight(_text_:22 in 2642) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.043121338 = score(doc=2642,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1857552 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.053045183 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2642, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2642)
    Abstract
    This article addresses the problem of unsupervised decomposition of a multi-author text document: identifying the sentences written by each author assuming the number of authors is unknown. An approach, BayesAD, is developed for solving this problem: apply a Bayesian segmentation algorithm, followed by a segment clustering algorithm. Results are presented from an empirical comparison between BayesAD and AK, a modified version of an approach published by Akiva and Koppel in 2013. BayesAD exhibited greater accuracy than AK in all experiments. However, BayesAD has a parameter that needs to be set and which had a nontrivial impact on accuracy. Developing an effective method for eliminating this need would be a fruitful direction for future work. When controlling for topic, the accuracy levels of BayesAD and AK were, in all but one case, worse than a baseline approach wherein one author was assumed to write all sentences in the input text document. Hence, room for improved solutions exists.
    Date
    22. 1.2016 14:08:11
    Type
    a
  16. Yuan, X. (J.); Belkin, N.J.: Applying an information-seeking dialogue model in an interactive information retrieval system (2014) 0.07 
    0.0746255 = sum of:
  0.026370928 = product of:
    0.10548371 = sum of:
      0.10548371 = weight(_text_:authors in 4544) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.10548371 = score(doc=4544,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.24182312 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.053045183 = queryNorm
          0.43620193 = fieldWeight in 4544, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4544)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.04825457 = sum of:
    0.012320121 = weight(_text_:a in 4544) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012320121 = score(doc=4544,freq=20.0), product of:
        0.06116359 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.053045183 = queryNorm
        0.20142901 = fieldWeight in 4544, product of:
          4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
            20.0 = termFreq=20.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4544)
    0.035934452 = weight(_text_:22 in 4544) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.035934452 = score(doc=4544,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1857552 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.053045183 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4544, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4544)
    Abstract
    Purpose - People often engage in different information-seeking strategies (ISSs) within a single information-seeking episode. A critical concern for the design of information retrieval (IR) systems is how to provide support for these different behaviors in a manner which searchers can easily understand, navigate and use, as they move from one ISS to another. The purpose of this paper is to describe a dialogue structure that was implemented in an experimental IR system, in order to address this concern. Design/methodology/approach - The authors conducted a user-centered experiment to evaluate the IR systems. Participants were asked to search for information on two different task types, with four different topics per task, in both the experimental system and a baseline system emulating state-of-the-art IR systems. The authors report here the results related explicitly to the use of the experimental system's dialogue structure. Findings - For one of the task types, most participants followed the search steps as predicted in the dialogue structures, and those who did so completed the task in fewer moves. For the other task type, predicted order of moves was often not followed, but participants again used fewer moves when following the predicted order. Results demonstrate that the dialogue structures the authors designed indeed support effective human information behavior patterns in a variety of ways, and that searchers can effectively use a system which changes to support different ISSs. Originality/value - This study shows that it is both possible and beneficial, to design an IR system which can support multiple ISSs, and that such a system can be understood and used successfully.
    Date
    6. 4.2015 19:22:59
    Type
    a
  17. Vukadin, A.; Slavic, A.: Challenges of facet analysis and concept placement in Universal Classifications : the example of architecture in UDC (2014) 0.07 
    0.07184562 = sum of:
  0.018270312 = product of:
    0.07308125 = sum of:
      0.07308125 = weight(_text_:authors in 1428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07308125 = score(doc=1428,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.24182312 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.053045183 = queryNorm
          0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 1428, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1428)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.053575307 = sum of:
    0.01045397 = weight(_text_:a in 1428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01045397 = score(doc=1428,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.06116359 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.053045183 = queryNorm
        0.1709182 = fieldWeight in 1428, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1428)
    0.043121338 = weight(_text_:22 in 1428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.043121338 = score(doc=1428,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1857552 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.053045183 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1428, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1428)
    Abstract
    The paper discusses the challenges of faceted vocabulary organization in universal classifications which treat the universe of knowledge as a coherent whole and in which the concepts and subjects in different disciplines are shared, related and combined. The authors illustrate the challenges of the facet analytical approach using, as an example, the revision of class 72 in UDC. The paper reports on the research undertaken in 2013 as preparation for the revision. This consisted of analysis of concept organization in the UDC schedules in comparison with the Art & Architecture Thesaurus and class W of the Bliss Bibliographic Classification. The paper illustrates how such research can contribute to a better understanding of the field and may lead to improvements in the facet structure of this segment of the UDC vocabulary.
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
    Type
    a
  18. Alonso Lifante, M.P.; Molero Madrid, F.J.: Enhancing OPAC records : evaluating and fitting within cataloguing standards a new proposal of description parameters for historical astronomical resources (2015) 0.07 
    0.07184562 = sum of:
  0.018270312 = product of:
    0.07308125 = sum of:
      0.07308125 = weight(_text_:authors in 2611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07308125 = score(doc=2611,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.24182312 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.053045183 = queryNorm
          0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 2611, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2611)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.053575307 = sum of:
    0.01045397 = weight(_text_:a in 2611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01045397 = score(doc=2611,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.06116359 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.053045183 = queryNorm
        0.1709182 = fieldWeight in 2611, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2611)
    0.043121338 = weight(_text_:22 in 2611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.043121338 = score(doc=2611,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1857552 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.053045183 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2611, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2611)
    Abstract
    Enhancing content description of specialized resources, particularly astronomical resources, is a matter that is still unresolved in library and information science. In this paper, the authors outline deficiencies in some fields and elements of cataloging standards for description of historical astronomical resources, mainly star atlases and catalogs. Furthermore, they review their recent proposal of astronomical parameters for a better description and propose an approach for accommodating these parameters in the current criteria of MARC 21, the International Standard Bibliographic Description, and Resource Description and Access. Fourteen new parameters are considered, and recommendations are provided to standards developers for the addition of elements to accommodate attributes of celestial cartographic resources. This would improve bibliographic records for such resources in astronomical libraries' OPACs, which will have a beneficial effect on information retrieval.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Type
    a
  19. Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019) 0.07 
    0.071615614 = sum of:
  0.06318735 = product of:
    0.2527494 = sum of:
      0.2527494 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.2527494 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.44971764 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.053045183 = queryNorm
          0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.008428259 = product of:
    0.016856518 = sum of:
      0.016856518 = weight(_text_:a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.016856518 = score(doc=400,freq=26.0), product of:
          0.06116359 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.053045183 = queryNorm
          0.27559727 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
            5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
              26.0 = termFreq=26.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    On a scientific concept hierarchy, a parent concept may have a few attributes, each of which has multiple values being a group of child concepts. We call these attributes facets: classification has a few facets such as application (e.g., face recognition), model (e.g., svm, knn), and metric (e.g., precision). In this work, we aim at building faceted concept hierarchies from scientific literature. Hierarchy construction methods heavily rely on hypernym detection, however, the faceted relations are parent-to-child links but the hypernym relation is a multi-hop, i.e., ancestor-to-descendent link with a specific facet "type-of". We use information extraction techniques to find synonyms, sibling concepts, and ancestor-descendent relations from a data science corpus. And we propose a hierarchy growth algorithm to infer the parent-child links from the three types of relationships. It resolves conflicts by maintaining the acyclic structure of a hierarchy.
    Content
    Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
    Type
    a
  20. Gazni, A.; Ghaseminik, Z.: Author practices in citing other authors, institutions, and journals (2016) 0.07 
    0.07084429 = sum of:
  0.06808943 = product of:
    0.27235773 = sum of:
      0.27235773 = weight(_text_:authors in 3129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.27235773 = score(doc=3129,freq=40.0), product of:
          0.24182312 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.053045183 = queryNorm
          1.1262684 = fieldWeight in 3129, product of:
            6.3245554 = tf(freq=40.0), with freq of:
              40.0 = termFreq=40.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3129)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.002754863 = product of:
    0.005509726 = sum of:
      0.005509726 = weight(_text_:a in 3129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.005509726 = score(doc=3129,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.06116359 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.053045183 = queryNorm
          0.090081796 = fieldWeight in 3129, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3129)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This study explores the extent to which authors with different impact and productivity levels cite journals, institutions, and other authors through an analysis of the scientific papers of 37,717 authors during 1990-2013. The results demonstrate that the core-scatter distribution of cited authors, institutions, and journals varies for authors in each impact and productivity class. All authors in the science network receive the majority of their credit from high-impact authors; however, this effect decreases as authors' impact levels decrease. Similarly, the proportion of citations that lower-impact authors make to each other increases as authors' impact levels decrease. High-impact authors, who have the highest degree of membership in the science network, publish fewer papers in comparison to highly productive authors. However, authors with the highest impact make both more references per paper and also more citations to papers in the science network. This suggests that high-impact authors produce the most relevant work in the science network. Comparing practices by productivity level, authors receive the majority of their credit from highly productive authors and authors cite highly productive authors more frequently than less productive authors.
    Type
    a

Authors

Languages

Types

  • a 5416
  • el 644
  • m 283
  • s 86
  • x 40
  • r 18
  • n 10
  • b 8
  • i 5
  • ag 2
  • p 1
  • v 1
  • z 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications