-
Pepermans, G.; Rousseau, S.: ¬The decision to submit to a journal : another example of a valence-consistent shift? (2016)
0.12
0.122195944 = sum of:
0.031091128 = product of:
0.12436451 = sum of:
0.12436451 = weight(_text_:authors in 2925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12436451 = score(doc=2925,freq=6.0), product of:
0.23758973 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052116565 = queryNorm
0.52344227 = fieldWeight in 2925, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2925)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.09110482 = sum of:
0.048738375 = weight(_text_:g in 2925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048738375 = score(doc=2925,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19574708 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.052116565 = queryNorm
0.24898648 = fieldWeight in 2925, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2925)
0.04236645 = weight(_text_:22 in 2925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04236645 = score(doc=2925,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18250333 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052116565 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2925, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2925)
- Abstract
- In this article we use a stated choice experiment to study researcher preferences in the information sciences and to investigate the relative importance of different journal characteristics in convincing potential authors to submit to a particular journal. The analysis distinguishes high quality from standard quality articles and focuses on the question whether communicating acceptance rates rather than rejection rates leads to other submission decisions. Our results show that a positive framing effect might be present when authors decide on submitting a high quality article. No evidence of a framing effect is found when authors consider a standard quality article. From a journal marketing perspective, this is important information for editors. Communicating acceptance rates rather than rejection rates might help to convince researchers to submit to their journal.
- Date
- 7. 5.2016 20:02:22
-
Xiao, G.: ¬A knowledge classification model based on the relationship between science and human needs (2013)
0.09
0.09110482 = product of:
0.18220964 = sum of:
0.18220964 = sum of:
0.09747675 = weight(_text_:g in 138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09747675 = score(doc=138,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19574708 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.052116565 = queryNorm
0.49797297 = fieldWeight in 138, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=138)
0.0847329 = weight(_text_:22 in 138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0847329 = score(doc=138,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18250333 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052116565 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 138, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=138)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 2.2013 12:36:34
-
Antos, G.: Wie Sprache Entscheidungen (vor)prägt : zum Einfluss und zur Rhetorik kollektiver Selbsttäuschungen (2014)
0.09
0.09110482 = product of:
0.18220964 = sum of:
0.18220964 = sum of:
0.09747675 = weight(_text_:g in 1489) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09747675 = score(doc=1489,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19574708 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.052116565 = queryNorm
0.49797297 = fieldWeight in 1489, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1489)
0.0847329 = weight(_text_:22 in 1489) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0847329 = score(doc=1489,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18250333 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052116565 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1489, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1489)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 6. 7.2014 18:22:33
-
Engels, T.C.E; Istenic Starcic, A.; Kulczycki, E.; Pölönen, J.; Sivertsen, G.: Are book publications disappearing from scholarly communication in the social sciences and humanities? (2018)
0.08
0.084670514 = sum of:
0.02393396 = product of:
0.09573584 = sum of:
0.09573584 = weight(_text_:authors in 4631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09573584 = score(doc=4631,freq=8.0), product of:
0.23758973 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052116565 = queryNorm
0.40294603 = fieldWeight in 4631, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4631)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.060736552 = sum of:
0.03249225 = weight(_text_:g in 4631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03249225 = score(doc=4631,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19574708 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.052116565 = queryNorm
0.165991 = fieldWeight in 4631, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4631)
0.0282443 = weight(_text_:22 in 4631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0282443 = score(doc=4631,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18250333 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052116565 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 4631, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4631)
- Abstract
- Purpose The purpose of this paper is to analyze the evolution in terms of shares of scholarly book publications in the social sciences and humanities (SSH) in five European countries, i.e. Flanders (Belgium), Finland, Norway, Poland and Slovenia. In addition to aggregate results for the whole of the social sciences and the humanities, the authors focus on two well-established fields, namely, economics & business and history. Design/methodology/approach Comprehensive coverage databases of SSH scholarly output have been set up in Flanders (VABB-SHW), Finland (VIRTA), Norway (NSI), Poland (PBN) and Slovenia (COBISS). These systems allow to trace the shares of monographs and book chapters among the total volume of scholarly publications in each of these countries. Findings As expected, the shares of scholarly monographs and book chapters in the humanities and in the social sciences differ considerably between fields of science and between the five countries studied. In economics & business and in history, the results show similar field-based variations as well as country variations. Most year-to-year and overall variation is rather limited. The data presented illustrate that book publishing is not disappearing from an SSH. Research limitations/implications The results presented in this paper illustrate that the polish scholarly evaluation system has influenced scholarly publication patterns considerably, while in the other countries the variations are manifested only slightly. The authors conclude that generalizations like "performance-based research funding systems (PRFS) are bad for book publishing" are flawed. Research evaluation systems need to take book publishing fully into account because of the crucial epistemic and social roles it serves in an SSH. Originality/value The authors present data on monographs and book chapters from five comprehensive coverage databases in Europe and analyze the data in view of the debates regarding the perceived detrimental effects of research evaluation systems on scholarly book publishing. The authors show that there is little reason to suspect a dramatic decline of scholarly book publishing in an SSH.
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
-
Vosgerau, G.: Sprache und Denken (2011)
0.08
0.07592069 = product of:
0.15184139 = sum of:
0.15184139 = sum of:
0.08123063 = weight(_text_:g in 3823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08123063 = score(doc=3823,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19574708 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.052116565 = queryNorm
0.4149775 = fieldWeight in 3823, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3823)
0.070610754 = weight(_text_:22 in 3823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.070610754 = score(doc=3823,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18250333 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052116565 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3823, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3823)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 23. 7.2011 13:13:22
-
Abramo, G.; D'Angelo, C.A.; Viel, F.: Assessing the accuracy of the h- and g-indexes for measuring researchers' productivity (2013)
0.07
0.07244163 = sum of:
0.01795047 = product of:
0.07180188 = sum of:
0.07180188 = weight(_text_:authors in 957) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07180188 = score(doc=957,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23758973 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052116565 = queryNorm
0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 957, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=957)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.054491162 = product of:
0.108982325 = sum of:
0.108982325 = weight(_text_:g in 957) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.108982325 = score(doc=957,freq=10.0), product of:
0.19574708 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.052116565 = queryNorm
0.5567507 = fieldWeight in 957, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=957)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Bibliometric indicators are increasingly used in support of decisions about recruitment, career advancement, rewards, and selective funding for scientists. Given the importance of the applications, bibliometricians are obligated to carry out empirical testing of the robustness of the indicators, in simulations of real contexts. In this work, we compare the results of national-scale research assessments at the individual level, based on the following three different indexes: the h-index, the g-index, and "fractional scientific strength" (FSS), an indicator previously proposed by the authors. For each index, we construct and compare rankings lists of all Italian academic researchers working in the hard sciences during the period 2001-2005. The analysis quantifies the shifts in ranks that occur when researchers' productivity rankings by simple indicators such as the h- or g-indexes are compared with those by more accurate FSS.
- Object
- g-index
-
Cabanac, G.; Hubert, G.; Hartley, J.: Solo versus collaborative writing : discrepancies in the use of tables and graphs in academic articles (2014)
0.07
0.07036418 = sum of:
0.03590094 = product of:
0.14360376 = sum of:
0.14360376 = weight(_text_:authors in 1242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14360376 = score(doc=1242,freq=8.0), product of:
0.23758973 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052116565 = queryNorm
0.60441905 = fieldWeight in 1242, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1242)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.034463238 = product of:
0.068926476 = sum of:
0.068926476 = weight(_text_:g in 1242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.068926476 = score(doc=1242,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19574708 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.052116565 = queryNorm
0.35212007 = fieldWeight in 1242, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1242)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The number of authors collaborating to write scientific articles has been increasing steadily, and with this collaboration, other factors have also changed, such as the length of articles and the number of citations. However, little is known about potential discrepancies in the use of tables and graphs between single and collaborating authors. In this article, we ask whether multiauthor articles contain more tables and graphs than single-author articles, and we studied 5,180 recent articles published in six science and social sciences journals. We found that pairs and multiple authors used significantly more tables and graphs than single authors. Such findings indicate that there is a greater emphasis on the role of tables and graphs in collaborative writing, and we discuss some of the possible causes and implications of these findings.
-
Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011)
0.06
0.062081188 = product of:
0.124162376 = sum of:
0.124162376 = product of:
0.4966495 = sum of:
0.4966495 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.4966495 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
0.44184482 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.052116565 = queryNorm
1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
-
Junger, U.: Basisinformationen zur Universellen Dezimalklassifikation (UDK) (2018)
0.06
0.060736552 = product of:
0.121473104 = sum of:
0.121473104 = sum of:
0.0649845 = weight(_text_:g in 4337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0649845 = score(doc=4337,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19574708 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.052116565 = queryNorm
0.331982 = fieldWeight in 4337, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4337)
0.0564886 = weight(_text_:22 in 4337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0564886 = score(doc=4337,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18250333 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052116565 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4337, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4337)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 7. 7.2018 17:22:00
- Source
- Klassifikationen in Bibliotheken: Theorie - Anwendung - Nutzen. Hrsg.: H. Alex, G. Bee u. U. Junger
-
Lorenz, B.: Zur Theorie und Terminologie der bibliothekarischen Klassifikation (2018)
0.06
0.060736552 = product of:
0.121473104 = sum of:
0.121473104 = sum of:
0.0649845 = weight(_text_:g in 4339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0649845 = score(doc=4339,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19574708 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.052116565 = queryNorm
0.331982 = fieldWeight in 4339, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4339)
0.0564886 = weight(_text_:22 in 4339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0564886 = score(doc=4339,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18250333 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052116565 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4339, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4339)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Pages
- S.1-22
- Source
- Klassifikationen in Bibliotheken: Theorie - Anwendung - Nutzen. Hrsg.: H. Alex, G. Bee u. U. Junger
-
Berti, Jr., D.W.; Lima, G.; Maculan, B.; Soergel, D.: Computer-assisted checking of conceptual relationships in a large thesaurus (2018)
0.06
0.060736552 = product of:
0.121473104 = sum of:
0.121473104 = sum of:
0.0649845 = weight(_text_:g in 4721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0649845 = score(doc=4721,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19574708 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.052116565 = queryNorm
0.331982 = fieldWeight in 4721, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4721)
0.0564886 = weight(_text_:22 in 4721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0564886 = score(doc=4721,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18250333 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052116565 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4721, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4721)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 17. 1.2019 19:04:22
-
Castanha, R.C.G.; Wolfram, D.: ¬The domain of knowledge organization : a bibliometric analysis of prolific authors and their intellectual space (2018)
0.06
0.059962355 = sum of:
0.042309668 = product of:
0.16923867 = sum of:
0.16923867 = weight(_text_:authors in 4150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16923867 = score(doc=4150,freq=16.0), product of:
0.23758973 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052116565 = queryNorm
0.7123147 = fieldWeight in 4150, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4150)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.017652689 = product of:
0.035305377 = sum of:
0.035305377 = weight(_text_:22 in 4150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035305377 = score(doc=4150,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18250333 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052116565 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4150, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4150)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The domain of knowledge organization (KO) represents a foundational area of information science. One way to better understand the intellectual structure of the KO domain is to apply bibliometric methods to key contributors to the literature. This study analyzes the most prolific contributing authors to the journal Knowledge Organization, the sources they cite and the citations they receive for the period 1993 to 2016. The analyses were conducted using visualization outcomes of citation, co-citation and author bibliographic coupling analysis to reveal theoretical points of reference among authors and the most prominent research themes that constitute this scientific community. Birger Hjørland was the most cited author, and was situated at or near the middle of each of the maps based on different citation relationships. The proximities between authors resulting from the different citation relationships demonstrate how authors situate themselves intellectually through the citations they give and how other authors situate them through the citations received. There is a consistent core of theoretical references as well among the most productive authors. We observed a close network of scholarly communication between the authors cited in this core, which indicates the actual role of the journal Knowledge Organization as a space for knowledge construction in the area of knowledge organization.
- Source
- Knowledge organization. 45(2018) no.1, S.13-22
-
Soergel, D.: Knowledge organization for learning (2014)
0.06
0.055892754 = sum of:
0.020942215 = product of:
0.08376886 = sum of:
0.08376886 = weight(_text_:authors in 1400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08376886 = score(doc=1400,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23758973 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052116565 = queryNorm
0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 1400, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1400)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.03495054 = product of:
0.06990108 = sum of:
0.06990108 = weight(_text_:22 in 1400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06990108 = score(doc=1400,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18250333 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052116565 = queryNorm
0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 1400, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1400)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper discusses and illustrates through examples how meaningful or deep learning can be supported through well-structured presentation of material, through giving learners schemas they can use to organize knowledge in their minds, and through helping learners to understand knowledge organization principles they can use to construct their own schemas. It is a call to all authors, educators and information designers to pay attention to meaningful presentation that expresses the internal structure of the domain and facilitates the learner's assimilation of concepts and their relationships.
- Pages
- S.22-32
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
Mitchell, J.S.; Zeng, M.L.; Zumer, M.: Modeling classification systems in multicultural and multilingual contexts (2012)
0.06
0.055343404 = sum of:
0.025385799 = product of:
0.101543196 = sum of:
0.101543196 = weight(_text_:authors in 1967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.101543196 = score(doc=1967,freq=4.0), product of:
0.23758973 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052116565 = queryNorm
0.42738882 = fieldWeight in 1967, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1967)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.029957606 = product of:
0.05991521 = sum of:
0.05991521 = weight(_text_:22 in 1967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05991521 = score(doc=1967,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18250333 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052116565 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 1967, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1967)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper reports on the second part of an initiative of the authors on researching classification systems with the conceptual model defined by the Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD) final report. In an earlier study, the authors explored whether the FRSAD conceptual model could be extended beyond subject authority data to model classification data. The focus of the current study is to determine if classification data modeled using FRSAD can be used to solve real-world discovery problems in multicultural and multilingual contexts. The paper discusses the relationships between entities (same type or different types) in the context of classification systems that involve multiple translations and /or multicultural implementations. Results of two case studies are presented in detail: (a) two instances of the DDC (DDC 22 in English, and the Swedish-English mixed translation of DDC 22), and (b) Chinese Library Classification. The use cases of conceptual models in practice are also discussed.
-
Mugridge, R.L.; Edmunds, J.: Batchloading MARC bibliographic records (2012)
0.05
0.054330528 = sum of:
0.029616764 = product of:
0.118467055 = sum of:
0.118467055 = weight(_text_:authors in 2600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.118467055 = score(doc=2600,freq=4.0), product of:
0.23758973 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052116565 = queryNorm
0.49862027 = fieldWeight in 2600, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2600)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.024713762 = product of:
0.049427524 = sum of:
0.049427524 = weight(_text_:22 in 2600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049427524 = score(doc=2600,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18250333 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052116565 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2600, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2600)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Research libraries are using batchloading to provide access to many resources that they would otherwise be unable to catalog given the staff and other resources available. To explore how such libraries are managing their batchloading activities, the authors conducted a survey of the Association for Library Collections and Technical Services Directors of Large Research Libraries Interest Group member libraries. The survey addressed staffing, budgets, scope, workflow, management, quality standards, information technology support, collaborative efforts, and assessment of batchloading activities. The authors provide an analysis of the survey results along with suggestions for process improvements and future research.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Chaves Guimarães, J.A.; Oliveira, E.T. de; Cabrini Gracio, M.C.: Theoretical referents in Knowledge Organization : a domain analysis of the Knowledge Organization journal (2012)
0.05
0.05429393 = sum of:
0.03664124 = product of:
0.14656496 = sum of:
0.14656496 = weight(_text_:authors in 823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14656496 = score(doc=823,freq=12.0), product of:
0.23758973 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052116565 = queryNorm
0.61688256 = fieldWeight in 823, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=823)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.017652689 = product of:
0.035305377 = sum of:
0.035305377 = weight(_text_:22 in 823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035305377 = score(doc=823,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18250333 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052116565 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 823, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=823)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Aiming at contributing to the epistemological characterization of the area of knowledge organization, our goal is to analyze the KO journal, since its creation in 1993, as a knowledge domain, from a nuclear community of the most productive and greater impact authors, analyzing the dialogue among citing authors and cited ones, and also the co-citations established by the citing authors. We worked with a corpus of 310 articles published between 1993 and 2011 produced by a total of 360 authors. The relatively more productive authors, a group geographically concentrated in Europe (37%), North America (44%) and Asia (19%), is clearly explained by the historical European origin of the ISKO and by an increasing North American presence along the years. Of the 33 most cited authors, 22 were co-cited in at least 6 works, which suggests that they are the theoretical referential nucleus of the area, in the studied journal. Finally, we observe that the area reveals theme cohesion and coherence in its production, enabling us to clearly visualize its theoretical referential nucleus and to confirm the role performed by the KO magazine as a catalyzing agent of international theoretical construction in the area.
-
Taylor, A.G.: Implementing AACR and AACR2 : a personal perspective and lessons learned (2012)
0.05
0.053144485 = product of:
0.10628897 = sum of:
0.10628897 = sum of:
0.05686144 = weight(_text_:g in 2546) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05686144 = score(doc=2546,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19574708 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.052116565 = queryNorm
0.29048425 = fieldWeight in 2546, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2546)
0.049427524 = weight(_text_:22 in 2546) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049427524 = score(doc=2546,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18250333 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052116565 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2546, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2546)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- As we move toward implementing RDA: Resource Description and Access, I have been pondering how we might manage the transition to new cataloging rules effectively. I was a practicing cataloger when Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, 2nd ed., was implemented and remember it as a traumatic process. The published literature that I found focused on the impact of the then-new rules on specific formats and genres, but no one seems to have addressed the process of implementation and what type of training worked well (or did not). After a bit of sleuthing, I found a pertinent presentation by Arlene G. Taylor, which she graciously agreed to repurpose as this guest editorial.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Benoit, G.; Hussey, L.: Repurposing digital objects : case studies across the publishing industry (2011)
0.05
0.053144485 = product of:
0.10628897 = sum of:
0.10628897 = sum of:
0.05686144 = weight(_text_:g in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05686144 = score(doc=4198,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19574708 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.052116565 = queryNorm
0.29048425 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
0.049427524 = weight(_text_:22 in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049427524 = score(doc=4198,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18250333 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052116565 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 14:23:07
-
Stumpf, G.: "Kerngeschäft" Sacherschließung in neuer Sicht : was gezielte intellektuelle Arbeit und maschinelle Verfahren gemeinsam bewirken können (2015)
0.05
0.053144485 = product of:
0.10628897 = sum of:
0.10628897 = sum of:
0.05686144 = weight(_text_:g in 1703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05686144 = score(doc=1703,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19574708 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.052116565 = queryNorm
0.29048425 = fieldWeight in 1703, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1703)
0.049427524 = weight(_text_:22 in 1703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049427524 = score(doc=1703,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18250333 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052116565 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1703, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1703)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Es handelt sich um den leicht überarbeiteten Text eines Vortrags bei der VDB-Fortbildungsveranstaltung "Wandel als Konstante: neue Aufgaben und Herausforderungen für sozialwissenschaftliche Bibliotheken" am 22./23. Januar 2015 in Berlin.
-
Roth, G.; Gerhardt, V.; Flaßpöhler, S.: Wie flexibel ist mein Ich? : Dialog (2012)
0.05
0.053144485 = product of:
0.10628897 = sum of:
0.10628897 = sum of:
0.05686144 = weight(_text_:g in 955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05686144 = score(doc=955,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19574708 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.052116565 = queryNorm
0.29048425 = fieldWeight in 955, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=955)
0.049427524 = weight(_text_:22 in 955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049427524 = score(doc=955,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18250333 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052116565 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 955, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=955)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 7. 5.2023 11:14:22
