-
Pohl, A.; Danowski, P.: Linked Open Data in der Bibliothekswelt : Überblick und Herausforderungen (2015)
0.07
0.069151506 = product of:
0.13830301 = sum of:
0.13830301 = sum of:
0.07097676 = weight(_text_:p in 2057) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07097676 = score(doc=2057,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14889121 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.041410286 = queryNorm
0.47670212 = fieldWeight in 2057, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2057)
0.06732626 = weight(_text_:22 in 2057) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06732626 = score(doc=2057,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14501177 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041410286 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2057, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2057)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 26. 8.2015 10:22:00
-
Shaw, R.; Golden, P.; Buckland, M.: Using linked library data in working research notes (2015)
0.07
0.069151506 = product of:
0.13830301 = sum of:
0.13830301 = sum of:
0.07097676 = weight(_text_:p in 2555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07097676 = score(doc=2555,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14889121 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.041410286 = queryNorm
0.47670212 = fieldWeight in 2555, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2555)
0.06732626 = weight(_text_:22 in 2555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06732626 = score(doc=2555,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14501177 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041410286 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2555, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2555)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 15. 1.2016 19:22:28
-
Foskett, D.J.: Systems theory and its relevance to documentary classification (2017)
0.07
0.069151506 = product of:
0.13830301 = sum of:
0.13830301 = sum of:
0.07097676 = weight(_text_:p in 3176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07097676 = score(doc=3176,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14889121 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.041410286 = queryNorm
0.47670212 = fieldWeight in 3176, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3176)
0.06732626 = weight(_text_:22 in 3176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06732626 = score(doc=3176,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14501177 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041410286 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3176, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3176)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 6. 5.2017 18:46:22
- Source
- International classification. 7(1980) no.1, p.2-5
-
Olivares-Rodríguez, C.; Guenaga, M.; Garaizar, P.: Using children's search patterns to predict the quality of their creative problem solving (2018)
0.07
0.06883226 = sum of:
0.011206005 = product of:
0.06723603 = sum of:
0.06723603 = weight(_text_:authors in 4635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06723603 = score(doc=4635,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1887818 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.041410286 = queryNorm
0.35615736 = fieldWeight in 4635, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4635)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
0.057626262 = sum of:
0.02957365 = weight(_text_:p in 4635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02957365 = score(doc=4635,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14889121 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.041410286 = queryNorm
0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 4635, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4635)
0.028052611 = weight(_text_:22 in 4635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028052611 = score(doc=4635,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14501177 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041410286 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4635, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4635)
- Abstract
- Purpose The purpose of this paper is to propose a computational model that implicitly predict the children's creative quality of solutions by analyzing the query pattern on a problem-solving-based lesson. Design/methodology/approach A search task related to the competencies acquired in the classroom was applied to automatically measure children' creativity. A blind review process of the creative quality was developed of 255 primary school students' solutions. Findings While there are many creativity training programs that have proven effective, many of these programs require measuring creativity previously which involves time-consuming tasks conducted by experienced reviewers, i.e. far from primary school classroom dynamics. The authors have developed a model that predicts the creative quality of the given solution using the search queries pattern as input. This model has been used to predict the creative quality of 255 primary school students' solutions with 80 percent sensitivity. Research limitations/implications Although the research was conducted with just one search task, participants come from two different countries. Therefore, the authors hope that this model provides detection of non-creative solutions to enable prompt intervention and improve the creative quality of solutions. Originality/value This is the first implicit classification model of query pattern in order to predict the children' creative quality of solutions. This model is based on a conceptual relation between the concept association of creative thinking and query chain model of information search.
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
-
Heneberg, P.: Supposedly uncited articles of Nobel laureates and Fields medalists can be prevalently attributed to the errors of omission and commission (2013)
0.07
0.065550104 = sum of:
0.0079238415 = product of:
0.04754305 = sum of:
0.04754305 = weight(_text_:authors in 660) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04754305 = score(doc=660,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1887818 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.041410286 = queryNorm
0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 660, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=660)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
0.057626262 = sum of:
0.02957365 = weight(_text_:p in 660) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02957365 = score(doc=660,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14889121 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.041410286 = queryNorm
0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 660, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=660)
0.028052611 = weight(_text_:22 in 660) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028052611 = score(doc=660,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14501177 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041410286 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 660, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=660)
- Abstract
- Several independent authors reported a high share of uncited publications, which include those produced by top scientists. This share was repeatedly reported to exceed 10% of the total papers produced, without any explanation of this phenomenon and the lack of difference in uncitedness between average and successful researchers. In this report, we analyze the uncitedness among two independent groups of highly visible scientists (mathematicians represented by Fields medalists, and researchers in physiology or medicine represented by Nobel Prize laureates in the respective field). Analysis of both groups led to the identical conclusion: over 90% of the uncited database records of highly visible scientists can be explained by the inclusion of editorial materials progress reports presented at international meetings (meeting abstracts), discussion items (letters to the editor, discussion), personalia (biographic items), and by errors of omission and commission of the Web of Science (WoS) database and of the citing documents. Only a marginal amount of original articles and reviews were found to be uncited (0.9 and 0.3%, respectively), which is in strong contrast with the previously reported data, which never addressed the document types among the uncited records.
- Date
- 22. 3.2013 19:21:46
-
Haustein, S.; Sugimoto, C.; Larivière, V.: Social media in scholarly communication : Guest editorial (2015)
0.07
0.06505008 = sum of:
0.004754305 = product of:
0.02852583 = sum of:
0.02852583 = weight(_text_:authors in 3809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02852583 = score(doc=3809,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1887818 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.041410286 = queryNorm
0.15110476 = fieldWeight in 3809, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3809)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
0.06029577 = sum of:
0.043464206 = weight(_text_:p in 3809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043464206 = score(doc=3809,freq=12.0), product of:
0.14889121 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.041410286 = queryNorm
0.29191923 = fieldWeight in 3809, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3809)
0.016831566 = weight(_text_:22 in 3809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016831566 = score(doc=3809,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14501177 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041410286 = queryNorm
0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 3809, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3809)
- Abstract
- This year marks 350 years since the inaugural publications of both the Journal des Sçavans and the Philosophical Transactions, first published in 1665 and considered the birth of the peer-reviewed journal article. This form of scholarly communication has not only remained the dominant model for disseminating new knowledge (particularly for science and medicine), but has also increased substantially in volume. Derek de Solla Price - the "father of scientometrics" (Merton and Garfield, 1986, p. vii) - was the first to document the exponential increase in scientific journals and showed that "scientists have always felt themselves to be awash in a sea of the scientific literature" (Price, 1963, p. 15), as, for example, expressed at the 1948 Royal Society's Scientific Information Conference: Not for the first time in history, but more acutely than ever before, there was a fear that scientists would be overwhelmed, that they would be no longer able to control the vast amounts of potentially relevant material that were pouring forth from the world's presses, that science itself was under threat (Bawden and Robinson, 2008, p. 183).
One of the solutions to help scientists filter the most relevant publications and, thus, to stay current on developments in their fields during the transition from "little science" to "big science", was the introduction of citation indexing as a Wellsian "World Brain" (Garfield, 1964) of scientific information: It is too much to expect a research worker to spend an inordinate amount of time searching for the bibliographic descendants of antecedent papers. It would not be excessive to demand that the thorough scholar check all papers that have cited or criticized such papers, if they could be located quickly. The citation index makes this check practicable (Garfield, 1955, p. 108). In retrospective, citation indexing can be perceived as a pre-social web version of crowdsourcing, as it is based on the concept that the community of citing authors outperforms indexers in highlighting cognitive links between papers, particularly on the level of specific ideas and concepts (Garfield, 1983). Over the last 50 years, citation analysis and more generally, bibliometric methods, have developed from information retrieval tools to research evaluation metrics, where they are presumed to make scientific funding more efficient and effective (Moed, 2006). However, the dominance of bibliometric indicators in research evaluation has also led to significant goal displacement (Merton, 1957) and the oversimplification of notions of "research productivity" and "scientific quality", creating adverse effects such as salami publishing, honorary authorships, citation cartels, and misuse of indicators (Binswanger, 2015; Cronin and Sugimoto, 2014; Frey and Osterloh, 2006; Haustein and Larivière, 2015; Weingart, 2005).
Furthermore, the rise of the web, and subsequently, the social web, has challenged the quasi-monopolistic status of the journal as the main form of scholarly communication and citation indices as the primary assessment mechanisms. Scientific communication is becoming more open, transparent, and diverse: publications are increasingly open access; manuscripts, presentations, code, and data are shared online; research ideas and results are discussed and criticized openly on blogs; and new peer review experiments, with open post publication assessment by anonymous or non-anonymous referees, are underway. The diversification of scholarly production and assessment, paired with the increasing speed of the communication process, leads to an increased information overload (Bawden and Robinson, 2008), demanding new filters. The concept of altmetrics, short for alternative (to citation) metrics, was created out of an attempt to provide a filter (Priem et al., 2010) and to steer against the oversimplification of the measurement of scientific success solely on the basis of number of journal articles published and citations received, by considering a wider range of research outputs and metrics (Piwowar, 2013). Although the term altmetrics was introduced in a tweet in 2010 (Priem, 2010), the idea of capturing traces - "polymorphous mentioning" (Cronin et al., 1998, p. 1320) - of scholars and their documents on the web to measure "impact" of science in a broader manner than citations was introduced years before, largely in the context of webometrics (Almind and Ingwersen, 1997; Thelwall et al., 2005):
There will soon be a critical mass of web-based digital objects and usage statistics on which to model scholars' communication behaviors - publishing, posting, blogging, scanning, reading, downloading, glossing, linking, citing, recommending, acknowledging - and with which to track their scholarly influence and impact, broadly conceived and broadly felt (Cronin, 2005, p. 196). A decade after Cronin's prediction and five years after the coining of altmetrics, the time seems ripe to reflect upon the role of social media in scholarly communication. This Special Issue does so by providing an overview of current research on the indicators and metrics grouped under the umbrella term of altmetrics, on their relationships with traditional indicators of scientific activity, and on the uses that are made of the various social media platforms - on which these indicators are based - by scientists of various disciplines.
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
-
Neunzert, H.: Mathematische Modellierung : ein "curriculum vitae" (2012)
0.06
0.06152117 = product of:
0.12304234 = sum of:
0.12304234 = product of:
0.738254 = sum of:
0.738254 = weight(_text_:c3 in 2255) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.738254 = score(doc=2255,freq=4.0), product of:
0.40379077 = queryWeight, product of:
9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
0.041410286 = queryNorm
1.8283083 = fieldWeight in 2255, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2255)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Vortrag auf der Tagung "Geschichte und Modellierung", Jena, 3. Februar 2012. Vgl. unter: http://www.fmi.uni-jena.de/Fakult%C3%A4t/Institute+und+Abteilungen/Abteilung+f%C3%BCr+Didaktik/Kolloquien.html?highlight=neunzert.
-
Sieglerschmidt, J.: Wissensordnungen im analogen und im digitalen Zeitalter (2017)
0.06
0.058002718 = product of:
0.116005436 = sum of:
0.116005436 = product of:
0.6960326 = sum of:
0.6960326 = weight(_text_:c3 in 4026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.6960326 = score(doc=4026,freq=8.0), product of:
0.40379077 = queryWeight, product of:
9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
0.041410286 = queryNorm
1.7237456 = fieldWeight in 4026, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4026)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Vgl. unter: https://books.google.de/books?hl=de&lr=&id=0rtGDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA35&dq=inhaltserschlie%C3%9Fung+OR+sacherschlie%C3%9Fung&ots=5u0TwCbFqE&sig=GGw3Coc21CINkone-6Lx8LaSAjY#v=onepage&q=inhaltserschlie%C3%9Fung%20OR%20sacherschlie%C3%9Fung&f=false.
-
Drewer, P.; Massion, F; Pulitano, D: Was haben Wissensmodellierung, Wissensstrukturierung, künstliche Intelligenz und Terminologie miteinander zu tun? (2017)
0.06
0.057626262 = product of:
0.115252525 = sum of:
0.115252525 = sum of:
0.0591473 = weight(_text_:p in 5576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0591473 = score(doc=5576,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14889121 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.041410286 = queryNorm
0.39725178 = fieldWeight in 5576, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5576)
0.056105223 = weight(_text_:22 in 5576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056105223 = score(doc=5576,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14501177 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041410286 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5576, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5576)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 13.12.2017 14:17:22
-
Kozikowski, P. et al.: Support of part-whole relations in query answering (2016)
0.06
0.057626262 = product of:
0.115252525 = sum of:
0.115252525 = sum of:
0.0591473 = weight(_text_:p in 2754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0591473 = score(doc=2754,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14889121 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.041410286 = queryNorm
0.39725178 = fieldWeight in 2754, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2754)
0.056105223 = weight(_text_:22 in 2754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056105223 = score(doc=2754,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14501177 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041410286 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2754, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2754)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 1. 2.2016 18:25:22
-
Delahaye, J.-P.: Big brother an der Hintertür (2018)
0.06
0.057626262 = product of:
0.115252525 = sum of:
0.115252525 = sum of:
0.0591473 = weight(_text_:p in 4190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0591473 = score(doc=4190,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14889121 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.041410286 = queryNorm
0.39725178 = fieldWeight in 4190, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4190)
0.056105223 = weight(_text_:22 in 4190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056105223 = score(doc=4190,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14501177 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041410286 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4190, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4190)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 2.2018 16:55:48
-
Häring, N.; Hensinger, P.: "Digitale Bildung" : Der abschüssige Weg zur Konditionierungsanstalt (2019)
0.06
0.057626262 = product of:
0.115252525 = sum of:
0.115252525 = sum of:
0.0591473 = weight(_text_:p in 4999) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0591473 = score(doc=4999,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14889121 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.041410286 = queryNorm
0.39725178 = fieldWeight in 4999, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4999)
0.056105223 = weight(_text_:22 in 4999) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056105223 = score(doc=4999,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14501177 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041410286 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4999, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4999)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 2.2019 11:45:19
-
Levin, M.; Krawczyk, S.; Bethard, S.; Jurafsky, D.: Citation-based bootstrapping for large-scale author disambiguation (2012)
0.06
0.05737099 = product of:
0.11474198 = sum of:
0.11474198 = product of:
0.34422594 = sum of:
0.06723603 = weight(_text_:authors in 246) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06723603 = score(doc=246,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1887818 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.041410286 = queryNorm
0.35615736 = fieldWeight in 246, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=246)
0.2769899 = weight(_text_:b3 in 246) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2769899 = score(doc=246,freq=2.0), product of:
0.45566803 = queryWeight, product of:
11.00374 = idf(docFreq=1, maxDocs=44218)
0.041410286 = queryNorm
0.60787654 = fieldWeight in 246, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
11.00374 = idf(docFreq=1, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=246)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- We present a new, two-stage, self-supervised algorithm for author disambiguation in large bibliographic databases. In the first "bootstrap" stage, a collection of high-precision features is used to bootstrap a training set with positive and negative examples of coreferring authors. A supervised feature-based classifier is then trained on the bootstrap clusters and used to cluster the authors in a larger unlabeled dataset. Our self-supervised approach shares the advantages of unsupervised approaches (no need for expensive hand labels) as well as supervised approaches (a rich set of features that can be discriminatively trained). The algorithm disambiguates 54,000,000 author instances in Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge with B3 F1 of.807. We analyze parameters and features, particularly those from citation networks, which have not been deeply investigated in author disambiguation. The most important citation feature is self-citation, which can be approximated without expensive extraction of the full network. For the supervised stage, the minor improvement due to other citation features (increasing F1 from.748 to.767) suggests they may not be worth the trouble of extracting from databases that don't already have them. A lean feature set without expensive abstract and title features performs 130 times faster with about equal F1.
-
Yan, E.; Ding, Y.; Sugimoto, C.R.: P-Rank: an indicator measuring prestige in heterogeneous scholarly networks (2011)
0.06
0.056911413 = sum of:
0.013447206 = product of:
0.08068323 = sum of:
0.08068323 = weight(_text_:authors in 4349) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08068323 = score(doc=4349,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1887818 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.041410286 = queryNorm
0.42738882 = fieldWeight in 4349, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4349)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
0.043464206 = product of:
0.08692841 = sum of:
0.08692841 = weight(_text_:p in 4349) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08692841 = score(doc=4349,freq=12.0), product of:
0.14889121 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.041410286 = queryNorm
0.58383846 = fieldWeight in 4349, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4349)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Ranking scientific productivity and prestige are often limited to homogeneous networks. These networks are unable to account for the multiple factors that constitute the scholarly communication and reward system. This study proposes a new informetric indicator, P-Rank, for measuring prestige in heterogeneous scholarly networks containing articles, authors, and journals. P-Rank differentiates the weight of each citation based on its citing papers, citing journals, and citing authors. Articles from 16 representative library and information science journals are selected as the dataset. Principle Component Analysis is conducted to examine the relationship between P-Rank and other bibliometric indicators. We also compare the correlation and rank variances between citation counts and P-Rank scores. This work provides a new approach to examining prestige in scholarly communication networks in a more comprehensive and nuanced way.
- Object
- P-Rank
-
Willis, C.; Greenberg, J.; White, H.: Analysis and synthesis of metadata goals for scientific data (2012)
0.06
0.05506581 = sum of:
0.008964803 = product of:
0.05378882 = sum of:
0.05378882 = weight(_text_:authors in 367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05378882 = score(doc=367,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1887818 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.041410286 = queryNorm
0.28492588 = fieldWeight in 367, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=367)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
0.046101008 = sum of:
0.023658918 = weight(_text_:p in 367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023658918 = score(doc=367,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14889121 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.041410286 = queryNorm
0.15890071 = fieldWeight in 367, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=367)
0.02244209 = weight(_text_:22 in 367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02244209 = score(doc=367,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14501177 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041410286 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 367, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=367)
- Abstract
- The proliferation of discipline-specific metadata schemes contributes to artificial barriers that can impede interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research. The authors considered this problem by examining the domains, objectives, and architectures of nine metadata schemes used to document scientific data in the physical, life, and social sciences. They used a mixed-methods content analysis and Greenberg's () metadata objectives, principles, domains, and architectural layout (MODAL) framework, and derived 22 metadata-related goals from textual content describing each metadata scheme. Relationships are identified between the domains (e.g., scientific discipline and type of data) and the categories of scheme objectives. For each strong correlation (>0.6), a Fisher's exact test for nonparametric data was used to determine significance (p < .05). Significant relationships were found between the domains and objectives of the schemes. Schemes describing observational data are more likely to have "scheme harmonization" (compatibility and interoperability with related schemes) as an objective; schemes with the objective "abstraction" (a conceptual model exists separate from the technical implementation) also have the objective "sufficiency" (the scheme defines a minimal amount of information to meet the needs of the community); and schemes with the objective "data publication" do not have the objective "element refinement." The analysis indicates that many metadata-driven goals expressed by communities are independent of scientific discipline or the type of data, although they are constrained by historical community practices and workflows as well as the technological environment at the time of scheme creation. The analysis reveals 11 fundamental metadata goals for metadata documenting scientific data in support of sharing research data across disciplines and domains. The authors report these results and highlight the need for more metadata-related research, particularly in the context of recent funding agency policy changes.
-
Ceri, S.; Bozzon, A.; Brambilla, M.; Della Valle, E.; Fraternali, P.; Quarteroni, S.: Web Information Retrieval (2013)
0.05
0.05244008 = sum of:
0.006339073 = product of:
0.03803444 = sum of:
0.03803444 = weight(_text_:authors in 1082) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03803444 = score(doc=1082,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1887818 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.041410286 = queryNorm
0.20147301 = fieldWeight in 1082, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1082)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
0.046101008 = sum of:
0.023658918 = weight(_text_:p in 1082) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023658918 = score(doc=1082,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14889121 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.041410286 = queryNorm
0.15890071 = fieldWeight in 1082, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1082)
0.02244209 = weight(_text_:22 in 1082) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02244209 = score(doc=1082,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14501177 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041410286 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1082, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1082)
- Abstract
- With the proliferation of huge amounts of (heterogeneous) data on the Web, the importance of information retrieval (IR) has grown considerably over the last few years. Big players in the computer industry, such as Google, Microsoft and Yahoo!, are the primary contributors of technology for fast access to Web-based information; and searching capabilities are now integrated into most information systems, ranging from business management software and customer relationship systems to social networks and mobile phone applications. Ceri and his co-authors aim at taking their readers from the foundations of modern information retrieval to the most advanced challenges of Web IR. To this end, their book is divided into three parts. The first part addresses the principles of IR and provides a systematic and compact description of basic information retrieval techniques (including binary, vector space and probabilistic models as well as natural language search processing) before focusing on its application to the Web. Part two addresses the foundational aspects of Web IR by discussing the general architecture of search engines (with a focus on the crawling and indexing processes), describing link analysis methods (specifically Page Rank and HITS), addressing recommendation and diversification, and finally presenting advertising in search (the main source of revenues for search engines). The third and final part describes advanced aspects of Web search, each chapter providing a self-contained, up-to-date survey on current Web research directions. Topics in this part include meta-search and multi-domain search, semantic search, search in the context of multimedia data, and crowd search. The book is ideally suited to courses on information retrieval, as it covers all Web-independent foundational aspects. Its presentation is self-contained and does not require prior background knowledge. It can also be used in the context of classic courses on data management, allowing the instructor to cover both structured and unstructured data in various formats. Its classroom use is facilitated by a set of slides, which can be downloaded from www.search-computing.org.
- Date
- 16.10.2013 19:22:44
-
Sojka, P.; Liska, M.: ¬The art of mathematics retrieval (2011)
0.05
0.048472222 = product of:
0.096944444 = sum of:
0.096944444 = sum of:
0.041403107 = weight(_text_:p in 3450) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041403107 = score(doc=3450,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14889121 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.041410286 = queryNorm
0.27807623 = fieldWeight in 3450, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3450)
0.055541337 = weight(_text_:22 in 3450) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055541337 = score(doc=3450,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14501177 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041410286 = queryNorm
0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 3450, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3450)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Vgl.: DocEng2011, September 19-22, 2011, Mountain View, California, USA Copyright 2011 ACM 978-1-4503-0863-2/11/09
- Date
- 22. 2.2017 13:00:42
-
Ohly, P.: Dimensions of globality : a bibliometric analysis (2016)
0.05
0.046101008 = product of:
0.092202015 = sum of:
0.092202015 = sum of:
0.047317836 = weight(_text_:p in 4942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047317836 = score(doc=4942,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14889121 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.041410286 = queryNorm
0.31780142 = fieldWeight in 4942, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4942)
0.04488418 = weight(_text_:22 in 4942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04488418 = score(doc=4942,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14501177 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041410286 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4942, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4942)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 20. 1.2019 11:22:31
-
Ménard, E.; Khashman, N.; Kochkina, S.; Torres-Moreno, J.-M.; Velazquez-Morales, P.; Zhou, F.; Jourlin, P.; Rawat, P.; Peinl, P.; Linhares Pontes, E.; Brunetti., I.: ¬A second life for TIIARA : from bilingual to multilingual! (2016)
0.04
0.043599956 = product of:
0.08719991 = sum of:
0.08719991 = sum of:
0.0591473 = weight(_text_:p in 2834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0591473 = score(doc=2834,freq=8.0), product of:
0.14889121 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.041410286 = queryNorm
0.39725178 = fieldWeight in 2834, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2834)
0.028052611 = weight(_text_:22 in 2834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028052611 = score(doc=2834,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14501177 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041410286 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2834, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2834)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Knowledge organization. 43(2016) no.1, S.22-34
-
Hajibayova, L.; Jacob, E.K.: User-generated genre tags through the lens of genre theories (2014)
0.04
0.04251885 = product of:
0.0850377 = sum of:
0.0850377 = sum of:
0.06259561 = weight(_text_:p in 1450) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06259561 = score(doc=1450,freq=14.0), product of:
0.14889121 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.041410286 = queryNorm
0.42041177 = fieldWeight in 1450, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1450)
0.02244209 = weight(_text_:22 in 1450) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02244209 = score(doc=1450,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14501177 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041410286 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1450, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1450)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- LIS genre studies have suggested that representing the genre of a resource could provide better knowledge representation, organization and retrieval (e.g., Andersen, 2008; Crowston & Kwasnik, 2003). Beghtol (2001) argues that genre analysis could be a useful tool for creating a "framework of analysis for a domain ... [to] structure and interpret texts, events, ideas, decisions, explanations and every other human activity in that domain" (p. 19). Although some studies of user-generated tagging vocabularies have found a preponderance of content-related tags (e.g., Munk & Mork, 2007), Lamere's (2008) study of the most frequently applied tags at Last.fm found that tags representing musical genres were favored by taggers. Studies of user-generated genre tags suggest that, unlike traditional indexing, which generally assigns a single genre, users' assignments of genre-related tags provide better representation of the fuzziness at the boundaries of genre categories (Inskip, 2009). In this way, user-generated genre tags are more in line with Bakhtin's (Bakhtin & Medvedev, 1928/1985) conceptualization of genre as an "aggregate of the means for seeing and conceptualizin reality" (p. 137). For Bakhtin (1986), genres are kinds of practice characterized by their "addressivity" (p. 95): Different genres correspond to different "conceptions of the addressee" and are "determined by that area of human activity and everyday life to which the given utterance is related" (p.95). Miller (1984) argues that genre refers to a "conventional category of discourse based in large-scale typification of rhetorical action; as action, it acquires meaning from situation and from the social context in which that situation arose" (p. 163). Genre is part of a social context that produces, reproduces, modifies and ultimately represents a particular text, but how to reunite genre and situation (or text and context) in systems of knowledge organization has not been addressed. Based on Devitt's (1993) argument suggesting that "our construction of genre is what helps us to construct a situation" (p. 577), one way to represent genre as "typified rhetorical actions based in recurrent situations" (Miller, 1984, p. 159) would be to employ genre tags generated by a particular group or community of users. This study suggests application of social network analysis to detect communities (Newman, 2006) of genre taggers and argues that communities of genre taggers can better define the nature and constitution of a discourse community while simultaneously shedding light on multifaceted representations of the resource genres.
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
