Search (5835 results, page 1 of 292)

0.1883562 = sum of:
  0.12419304 = product of:
    0.49677217 = sum of:
      0.49677217 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.49677217 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.44195393 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052129436 = queryNorm
          1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.06416316 = product of:
    0.09624474 = sum of:
      0.08807481 = weight(_text_:k in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08807481 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18609051 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052129436 = queryNorm
          0.47329018 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
      0.008169928 = weight(_text_:s in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.008169928 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.056677084 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052129436 = queryNorm
          0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
    0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Content

Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.

Pages

222 S

0.1362642 = sum of:
  0.072445944 = product of:
    0.28978378 = sum of:
      0.28978378 = weight(_text_:3a in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.28978378 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.44195393 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052129436 = queryNorm
          0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.06381826 = product of:
    0.095727384 = sum of:
      0.08898754 = weight(_text_:k in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08898754 = score(doc=5955,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.18609051 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052129436 = queryNorm
          0.4781949 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
      0.006739847 = weight(_text_:s in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.006739847 = score(doc=5955,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.056677084 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052129436 = queryNorm
          0.118916616 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
    0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Classification

OKH (FH K)

Footnote

Rez. in: Philosophisch-ethische Rezensionen vom 09.11.2019 (Jürgen Czogalla), Unter: https://philosophisch-ethische-rezensionen.de/rezension/Goedert1.html. In: B.I.T. online 23(2020) H.3, S.345-347 (W. Sühl-Strohmenger) [Unter: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.b-i-t-online.de%2Fheft%2F2020-03-rezensionen.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0iY3f_zNcvEjeZ6inHVnOK]. In: Open Password Nr. 805 vom 14.08.2020 (H.-C. Hobohm) [Unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzE0MywiOGI3NjZkZmNkZjQ1IiwwLDAsMTMxLDFd].

GHBS

OKH (FH K)

Pages

XIV, 288 S

0.12159809 = sum of:
  0.031098805 = product of:
    0.12439522 = sum of:
      0.12439522 = weight(_text_:authors in 4000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.12439522 = score(doc=4000,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.23764841 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052129436 = queryNorm
          0.52344227 = fieldWeight in 4000, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4000)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.09049928 = sum of:
    0.044037405 = weight(_text_:k in 4000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.044037405 = score(doc=4000,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18609051 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052129436 = queryNorm
        0.23664509 = fieldWeight in 4000, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4000)
    0.004084964 = weight(_text_:s in 4000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.004084964 = score(doc=4000,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.056677084 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052129436 = queryNorm
        0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 4000, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4000)
    0.042376913 = weight(_text_:22 in 4000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.042376913 = score(doc=4000,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1825484 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052129436 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4000, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4000)

Abstract

Author research impact was examined based on citer analysis (the number of citers as opposed to the number of citations) for 90 highly cited authors grouped into three broad subject areas. Citer-based outcome measures were also compared with more traditional citation-based measures for levels of association. The authors found that there are significant differences in citer-based outcomes among the three broad subject areas examined and that there is a high degree of correlation between citer and citation-based measures for all measures compared, except for two outcomes calculated for the social sciences. Citer-based measures do produce slightly different rankings of authors based on citer counts when compared to more traditional citation counts. Examples are provided. Citation measures may not adequately address the influence, or reach, of an author because citations usually do not address the origin of the citation beyond self-citations.

Date

28. 9.2010 12:54:22

Source

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.10, S.2086-2096

0.10576363 = sum of:
  0.103494205 = product of:
    0.41397682 = sum of:
      0.41397682 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.41397682 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.44195393 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052129436 = queryNorm
          0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.0022694245 = product of:
    0.0068082735 = sum of:
      0.0068082735 = weight(_text_:s in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0068082735 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.056677084 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052129436 = queryNorm
          0.120123915 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Source

http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja

0.09049928 = product of:
  0.18099856 = sum of:
    0.18099856 = sum of:
      0.08807481 = weight(_text_:k in 4248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08807481 = score(doc=4248,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18609051 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052129436 = queryNorm
          0.47329018 = fieldWeight in 4248, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4248)
      0.008169928 = weight(_text_:s in 4248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.008169928 = score(doc=4248,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.056677084 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052129436 = queryNorm
          0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 4248, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4248)
      0.084753826 = weight(_text_:22 in 4248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.084753826 = score(doc=4248,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1825484 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052129436 = queryNorm
          0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4248, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4248)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 2011, H.2, S.22-29

0.09049928 = product of:
  0.18099856 = sum of:
    0.18099856 = sum of:
      0.08807481 = weight(_text_:k in 4973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08807481 = score(doc=4973,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18609051 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052129436 = queryNorm
          0.47329018 = fieldWeight in 4973, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4973)
      0.008169928 = weight(_text_:s in 4973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.008169928 = score(doc=4973,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.056677084 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052129436 = queryNorm
          0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 4973, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4973)
      0.084753826 = weight(_text_:22 in 4973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.084753826 = score(doc=4973,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1825484 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052129436 = queryNorm
          0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4973, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4973)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

1. 2.2019 12:50:22

Source

Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 65(2018) H.1, S.3-7

0.09037849 = sum of:
  0.01496242 = product of:
    0.05984968 = sum of:
      0.05984968 = weight(_text_:authors in 3070) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05984968 = score(doc=3070,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.23764841 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052129436 = queryNorm
          0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 3070, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3070)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.07541607 = sum of:
    0.03669784 = weight(_text_:k in 3070) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03669784 = score(doc=3070,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18609051 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052129436 = queryNorm
        0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 3070, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3070)
    0.0034041367 = weight(_text_:s in 3070) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0034041367 = score(doc=3070,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.056677084 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052129436 = queryNorm
        0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 3070, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3070)
    0.035314094 = weight(_text_:22 in 3070) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.035314094 = score(doc=3070,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1825484 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052129436 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3070, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3070)

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to investigate user experiences with a touch-wall interface featuring both clustering and categorization representations of available e-books in a public library to understand human information interactions under work-focused and recreational contexts. Design/methodology/approach - Researchers collected questionnaires from 251 New Taipei City Library visitors who used the touch-wall interface to search for new titles. The authors applied structural equation modelling to examine relationships among hedonic/utilitarian needs, clustering and categorization representations, perceived ease of use (EU) and the extent to which users experienced anxiety and uncertainty (AU) while interacting with the interface. Findings - Utilitarian users who have an explicit idea of what they intend to find tend to prefer the categorization interface. A hedonic-oriented user tends to prefer clustering interfaces. Users reported EU regardless of which interface they engaged with. Results revealed that use of the clustering interface had a negative correlation with AU. Users that seek to satisfy utilitarian needs tended to emphasize the importance of perceived EU, whilst pleasure-seeking users were a little more tolerant of anxiety or uncertainty. Originality/value - The Online Public Access Catalogue (OPAC) encourages library visitors to borrow digital books through the implementation of an information visualization system. This situation poses an opportunity to validate uses and gratification theory. People with hedonic/utilitarian needs displayed different risk-control attitudes and affected uncertainty using the interface. Knowledge about user interaction with such interfaces is vital when launching the development of a new OPAC.

Date

20. 1.2015 18:30:22

Source

Aslib journal of information management. 68(2016) no.3, S.265-285

0.073879294 = sum of:
  0.020947387 = product of:
    0.08378955 = sum of:
      0.08378955 = weight(_text_:authors in 4966) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08378955 = score(doc=4966,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.23764841 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052129436 = queryNorm
          0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 4966, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4966)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.052931905 = product of:
    0.07939786 = sum of:
      0.07265801 = weight(_text_:k in 4966) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07265801 = score(doc=4966,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.18609051 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052129436 = queryNorm
          0.39044446 = fieldWeight in 4966, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4966)
      0.006739847 = weight(_text_:s in 4966) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.006739847 = score(doc=4966,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.056677084 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052129436 = queryNorm
          0.118916616 = fieldWeight in 4966, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4966)
    0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

Landmark textbook taking a whole subject approach to information science as a discipline. The authors' expert narratives guides you through each of the essential components of information science, offering a concise introduction an expertly chosen readings and resources. This is the definitve science textbook for students of this subject, and of information and knowledge management, librarianship, archives and records management worldwide.

Classification

BAHH (FH K)

Footnote

Rez. in: JASIST 64(2013) no.5, S.1081-1083 (E. Aversa)

GHBS

BAHH (FH K)

Pages

XXX, 351 S

0.07073681 = sum of:
  0.020947387 = product of:
    0.08378955 = sum of:
      0.08378955 = weight(_text_:authors in 1400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08378955 = score(doc=1400,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.23764841 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052129436 = queryNorm
          0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 1400, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1400)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.049789425 = product of:
    0.074684136 = sum of:
      0.0047657914 = weight(_text_:s in 1400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0047657914 = score(doc=1400,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.056677084 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052129436 = queryNorm
          0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 1400, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1400)
      0.06991834 = weight(_text_:22 in 1400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06991834 = score(doc=1400,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.1825484 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052129436 = queryNorm
          0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 1400, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1400)
    0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

This paper discusses and illustrates through examples how meaningful or deep learning can be supported through well-structured presentation of material, through giving learners schemas they can use to organize knowledge in their minds, and through helping learners to understand knowledge organization principles they can use to construct their own schemas. It is a call to all authors, educators and information designers to pay attention to meaningful presentation that expresses the internal structure of the domain and facilitates the learner's assimilation of concepts and their relationships.

Pages

S.22-32

Source

Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik

0.068132274 = sum of:
  0.042320117 = product of:
    0.16928047 = sum of:
      0.16928047 = weight(_text_:authors in 4150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.16928047 = score(doc=4150,freq=16.0), product of:
          0.23764841 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052129436 = queryNorm
          0.7123147 = fieldWeight in 4150, product of:
            4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
              16.0 = termFreq=16.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4150)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.025812155 = product of:
    0.03871823 = sum of:
      0.0034041367 = weight(_text_:s in 4150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0034041367 = score(doc=4150,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.056677084 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052129436 = queryNorm
          0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 4150, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4150)
      0.035314094 = weight(_text_:22 in 4150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.035314094 = score(doc=4150,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1825484 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052129436 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4150, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4150)
    0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

The domain of knowledge organization (KO) represents a foundational area of information science. One way to better understand the intellectual structure of the KO domain is to apply bibliometric methods to key contributors to the literature. This study analyzes the most prolific contributing authors to the journal Knowledge Organization, the sources they cite and the citations they receive for the period 1993 to 2016. The analyses were conducted using visualization outcomes of citation, co-citation and author bibliographic coupling analysis to reveal theoretical points of reference among authors and the most prominent research themes that constitute this scientific community. Birger Hjørland was the most cited author, and was situated at or near the middle of each of the maps based on different citation relationships. The proximities between authors resulting from the different citation relationships demonstrate how authors situate themselves intellectually through the citations they give and how other authors situate them through the citations received. There is a consistent core of theoretical references as well among the most productive authors. We observed a close network of scholarly communication between the authors cited in this core, which indicates the actual role of the journal Knowledge Organization as a space for knowledge construction in the area of knowledge organization.

Source

Knowledge organization. 45(2018) no.1, S.13-22

0.068048686 = sum of:
  0.06691398 = product of:
    0.2676559 = sum of:
      0.2676559 = weight(_text_:authors in 3129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.2676559 = score(doc=3129,freq=40.0), product of:
          0.23764841 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052129436 = queryNorm
          1.1262684 = fieldWeight in 3129, product of:
            6.3245554 = tf(freq=40.0), with freq of:
              40.0 = termFreq=40.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3129)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.0011347122 = product of:
    0.0034041367 = sum of:
      0.0034041367 = weight(_text_:s in 3129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0034041367 = score(doc=3129,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.056677084 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052129436 = queryNorm
          0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 3129, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3129)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

This study explores the extent to which authors with different impact and productivity levels cite journals, institutions, and other authors through an analysis of the scientific papers of 37,717 authors during 1990-2013. The results demonstrate that the core-scatter distribution of cited authors, institutions, and journals varies for authors in each impact and productivity class. All authors in the science network receive the majority of their credit from high-impact authors; however, this effect decreases as authors' impact levels decrease. Similarly, the proportion of citations that lower-impact authors make to each other increases as authors' impact levels decrease. High-impact authors, who have the highest degree of membership in the science network, publish fewer papers in comparison to highly productive authors. However, authors with the highest impact make both more references per paper and also more citations to papers in the science network. This suggests that high-impact authors produce the most relevant work in the science network. Comparing practices by productivity level, authors receive the majority of their credit from highly productive authors and authors cite highly productive authors more frequently than less productive authors.

Source

Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67(2016) no.10, S.2536-2549

0.06705259 = sum of:
  0.029624078 = product of:
    0.11849631 = sum of:
      0.11849631 = weight(_text_:authors in 1933) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11849631 = score(doc=1933,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.23764841 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052129436 = queryNorm
          0.49862027 = fieldWeight in 1933, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1933)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.037428513 = product of:
    0.056142766 = sum of:
      0.051376976 = weight(_text_:k in 1933) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.051376976 = score(doc=1933,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18609051 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052129436 = queryNorm
          0.27608594 = fieldWeight in 1933, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1933)
      0.0047657914 = weight(_text_:s in 1933) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0047657914 = score(doc=1933,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.056677084 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052129436 = queryNorm
          0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 1933, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1933)
    0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

This article provides a background for the change of the classification system for Chinese language materials at an academic library. It describes how the decision was made; how choices on partial reclassification or total reclassification were made; and how matters such as project planning, implementation, and vision for the future are being handled. It is hoped that the authors' experience can offer tips for other libraries contemplating reclassification projects. By making use of the Chinese Library Classification (CLC) numbers from various sources in Mainland China, the authors envisage increased cataloging efficiency and cost saving in the long run.

Source

Cataloging and classification quarterly. 50(2012) no.8, S.852-868

0.06576109 = sum of:
  0.029624078 = product of:
    0.11849631 = sum of:
      0.11849631 = weight(_text_:authors in 2600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11849631 = score(doc=2600,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.23764841 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052129436 = queryNorm
          0.49862027 = fieldWeight in 2600, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2600)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.036137015 = product of:
    0.054205522 = sum of:
      0.0047657914 = weight(_text_:s in 2600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0047657914 = score(doc=2600,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.056677084 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052129436 = queryNorm
          0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 2600, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2600)
      0.049439732 = weight(_text_:22 in 2600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.049439732 = score(doc=2600,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1825484 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052129436 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2600, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2600)
    0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

Research libraries are using batchloading to provide access to many resources that they would otherwise be unable to catalog given the staff and other resources available. To explore how such libraries are managing their batchloading activities, the authors conducted a survey of the Association for Library Collections and Technical Services Directors of Large Research Libraries Interest Group member libraries. The survey addressed staffing, budgets, scope, workflow, management, quality standards, information technology support, collaborative efforts, and assessment of batchloading activities. The authors provide an analysis of the survey results along with suggestions for process improvements and future research.

Date

10. 9.2000 17:38:22

Source

Library resources and technical services. 56(2012) no.3, S.155-170

0.063458174 = sum of:
  0.06209652 = product of:
    0.24838609 = sum of:
      0.24838609 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.24838609 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.44195393 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052129436 = queryNorm
          0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.0013616546 = product of:
    0.004084964 = sum of:
      0.004084964 = weight(_text_:s in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.004084964 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.056677084 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052129436 = queryNorm
          0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Content

Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.

Pages

S.140-150

0.063458174 = sum of:
  0.06209652 = product of:
    0.24838609 = sum of:
      0.24838609 = weight(_text_:3a in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.24838609 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.44195393 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052129436 = queryNorm
          0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.0013616546 = product of:
    0.004084964 = sum of:
      0.004084964 = weight(_text_:s in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.004084964 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.056677084 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052129436 = queryNorm
          0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Footnote

https%3A%2F%2Fjournals.univie.ac.at%2Findex.php%2Fvoebm%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F5332%2F5271%2F&usg=AOvVaw2yQdFGHlmOwVls7ANCpTii.

Source

Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. 73(2020) H.3/4, S.496-503

0.06320143 = sum of:
  0.031098805 = product of:
    0.12439522 = sum of:
      0.12439522 = weight(_text_:authors in 2925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.12439522 = score(doc=2925,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.23764841 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052129436 = queryNorm
          0.52344227 = fieldWeight in 2925, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2925)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.03210262 = product of:
    0.048153926 = sum of:
      0.0057770116 = weight(_text_:s in 2925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0057770116 = score(doc=2925,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.056677084 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052129436 = queryNorm
          0.101928525 = fieldWeight in 2925, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2925)
      0.042376913 = weight(_text_:22 in 2925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.042376913 = score(doc=2925,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1825484 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052129436 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2925, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2925)
    0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

In this article we use a stated choice experiment to study researcher preferences in the information sciences and to investigate the relative importance of different journal characteristics in convincing potential authors to submit to a particular journal. The analysis distinguishes high quality from standard quality articles and focuses on the question whether communicating acceptance rates rather than rejection rates leads to other submission decisions. Our results show that a positive framing effect might be present when authors decide on submitting a high quality article. No evidence of a framing effect is found when authors consider a standard quality article. From a journal marketing perspective, this is important information for editors. Communicating acceptance rates rather than rejection rates might help to convince researchers to submit to their journal.

Date

7. 5.2016 20:02:22

Source

Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67(2016) no.6, S.1372-1383

0.06318039 = sum of:
  0.031098805 = product of:
    0.12439522 = sum of:
      0.12439522 = weight(_text_:authors in 234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.12439522 = score(doc=234,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.23764841 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052129436 = queryNorm
          0.52344227 = fieldWeight in 234, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=234)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.03208158 = product of:
    0.04812237 = sum of:
      0.044037405 = weight(_text_:k in 234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.044037405 = score(doc=234,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18609051 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052129436 = queryNorm
          0.23664509 = fieldWeight in 234, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=234)
      0.004084964 = weight(_text_:s in 234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.004084964 = score(doc=234,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.056677084 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052129436 = queryNorm
          0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 234, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=234)
    0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

The authors review five paradigms from the discipline of community sociology (functionalism, evolution, conflict, interactionism, and exchange) to assess their potential utility for understanding everyday life information behavior and technology use. Their analysis considers the ways in which each paradigm defines the concepts of community, information, and technology. It also explores the insights offered by each paradigm regarding relationships between community and both information and technology. Accordingly, the authors highlight the ways in which existing information behavior and informatics scholarship draws from similar conceptual roots. Key insights drawn from this research, as well as remaining gaps and research questions, are examined. Additionally, they consider the limitations of each approach. The authors conclude by arguing for the value of a vigorous research program regarding information behavior and technology use in communities, particularly that which takes the community as the central unit of analysis. They consider key questions that could drive such a research program, as well as potentially fruitful conceptual and methodological approaches for this endeavor.

Source

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.5, S.847-864

0.06246244 = sum of:
  0.03665029 = product of:
    0.14660116 = sum of:
      0.14660116 = weight(_text_:authors in 823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.14660116 = score(doc=823,freq=12.0), product of:
          0.23764841 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052129436 = queryNorm
          0.61688256 = fieldWeight in 823, product of:
            3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
              12.0 = termFreq=12.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=823)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.025812155 = product of:
    0.03871823 = sum of:
      0.0034041367 = weight(_text_:s in 823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0034041367 = score(doc=823,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.056677084 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052129436 = queryNorm
          0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 823, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=823)
      0.035314094 = weight(_text_:22 in 823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.035314094 = score(doc=823,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1825484 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052129436 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 823, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=823)
    0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

Aiming at contributing to the epistemological characterization of the area of knowledge organization, our goal is to analyze the KO journal, since its creation in 1993, as a knowledge domain, from a nuclear community of the most productive and greater impact authors, analyzing the dialogue among citing authors and cited ones, and also the co-citations established by the citing authors. We worked with a corpus of 310 articles published between 1993 and 2011 produced by a total of 360 authors. The relatively more productive authors, a group geographically concentrated in Europe (37%), North America (44%) and Asia (19%), is clearly explained by the historical European origin of the ISKO and by an increasing North American presence along the years. Of the 33 most cited authors, 22 were co-cited in at least 6 works, which suggests that they are the theoretical referential nucleus of the area, in the studied journal. Finally, we observe that the area reveals theme cohesion and coherence in its production, enabling us to clearly visualize its theoretical referential nucleus and to confirm the role performed by the KO magazine as a catalyzing agent of international theoretical construction in the area.

Pages

S.31-38

0.06241957 = sum of:
  0.025915675 = product of:
    0.1036627 = sum of:
      0.1036627 = weight(_text_:authors in 2590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.1036627 = score(doc=2590,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.23764841 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052129436 = queryNorm
          0.43620193 = fieldWeight in 2590, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2590)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.036503896 = product of:
    0.054755844 = sum of:
      0.004814176 = weight(_text_:s in 2590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.004814176 = score(doc=2590,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.056677084 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052129436 = queryNorm
          0.08494043 = fieldWeight in 2590, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2590)
      0.04994167 = weight(_text_:22 in 2590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04994167 = score(doc=2590,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.1825484 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052129436 = queryNorm
          0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2590, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2590)
    0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to analyse the global scientific outputs of ontology research, an important emerging discipline that has huge potential to improve information understanding, organization, and management. Design/methodology/approach - This study collected literature published during 1900-2012 from the Web of Science database. The bibliometric analysis was performed from authorial, institutional, national, spatiotemporal, and topical aspects. Basic statistical analysis, visualization of geographic distribution, co-word analysis, and a new index were applied to the selected data. Findings - Characteristics of publication outputs suggested that ontology research has entered into the soaring stage, along with increased participation and collaboration. The authors identified the leading authors, institutions, nations, and articles in ontology research. Authors were more from North America, Europe, and East Asia. The USA took the lead, while China grew fastest. Four major categories of frequently used keywords were identified: applications in Semantic Web, applications in bioinformatics, philosophy theories, and common supporting technology. Semantic Web research played a core role, and gene ontology study was well-developed. The study focus of ontology has shifted from philosophy to information science. Originality/value - This is the first study to quantify global research patterns and trends in ontology, which might provide a potential guide for the future research. The new index provides an alternative way to evaluate the multidisciplinary influence of researchers.

Date

20. 1.2015 18:30:22
17. 9.2018 18:22:23

Source

Aslib journal of information management. 67(2015) no.1, S.27-54

0.062197074 = sum of:
  0.017954903 = product of:
    0.07181961 = sum of:
      0.07181961 = weight(_text_:authors in 4457) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07181961 = score(doc=4457,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.23764841 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052129436 = queryNorm
          0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 4457, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4457)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.044242173 = product of:
    0.06636326 = sum of:
      0.062278293 = weight(_text_:k in 4457) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.062278293 = score(doc=4457,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.18609051 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052129436 = queryNorm
          0.33466667 = fieldWeight in 4457, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4457)
      0.004084964 = weight(_text_:s in 4457) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.004084964 = score(doc=4457,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.056677084 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052129436 = queryNorm
          0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 4457, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4457)
    0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

With increasing digital information availability, semantic web technologies have been employed to construct semantic digital libraries in order to ease information comprehension. The use of semantic web enables users to search or visualize resources in a semantic fashion. Semantic web generation is a key process in semantic digital library construction, which converts metadata of digital resources into semantic web data. Many text mining technologies, such as keyword extraction and clustering, have been proposed to generate semantic web data. However, one important type of metadata in publications, called affiliation, is hard to convert into semantic web data precisely because different authors, who have the same affiliation, often express the affiliation in different ways. To address this issue, this paper proposes a clustering method based on normalized compression distance for the purpose of affiliation disambiguation. The experimental results show that our method is able to identify different affiliations that denote the same institutes. The clustering results outperform the well-known k-means clustering method in terms of average precision, F-measure, entropy, and purity.

Source

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.6, S.1029-1041