Search (2202 results, page 1 of 111)

  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Neunzert, H.: Mathematische Modellierung : ein "curriculum vitae" (2012) 0.14
    0.14322612 = sum of:
      0.12588966 = product of:
        0.75533795 = sum of:
          0.75533795 = weight(_text_:c3 in 2255) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.75533795 = score(doc=2255,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.41313487 = queryWeight, product of:
                9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04236856 = queryNorm
              1.8283083 = fieldWeight in 2255, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2255)
        0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
      0.01733645 = product of:
        0.0346729 = sum of:
          0.0346729 = weight(_text_:h in 2255) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0346729 = score(doc=2255,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.10526253 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04236856 = queryNorm
              0.32939452 = fieldWeight in 2255, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2255)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vortrag auf der Tagung "Geschichte und Modellierung", Jena, 3. Februar 2012. Vgl. unter: http://www.fmi.uni-jena.de/Fakult%C3%A4t/Institute+und+Abteilungen/Abteilung+f%C3%BCr+Didaktik/Kolloquien.html?highlight=neunzert.
  2. Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen : Nachhaltigkeit, Verfügbarkeit, semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008 (2010) 0.07
    0.06627464 = sum of:
      0.03175559 = product of:
        0.19053353 = sum of:
          0.19053353 = weight(_text_:böller in 774) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.19053353 = score(doc=774,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.4273907 = queryWeight, product of:
                10.087449 = idf(docFreq=4, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04236856 = queryNorm
              0.44580647 = fieldWeight in 774, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                10.087449 = idf(docFreq=4, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=774)
        0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
      0.034519054 = sum of:
        0.011557634 = weight(_text_:h in 774) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011557634 = score(doc=774,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10526253 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04236856 = queryNorm
            0.10979818 = fieldWeight in 774, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=774)
        0.022961421 = weight(_text_:22 in 774) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022961421 = score(doc=774,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14836748 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04236856 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 774, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=774)
    
    Content
    Inhalt: A. Grundsätzliche Fragen (aus dem Umfeld) der Wissensorganisation Markus Gottwald, Matthias Klemm und Jan Weyand: Warum ist es schwierig, Wissen zu managen? Ein soziologischer Deutungsversuch anhand eines Wissensmanagementprojekts in einem Großunternehmen H. Peter Ohly: Wissenskommunikation und -organisation. Quo vadis? Helmut F. Spinner: Wissenspartizipation und Wissenschaftskommunikation in drei Wissensräumen: Entwurf einer integrierten Theorie B. Dokumentationssprachen in der Anwendung Felix Boteram: Semantische Relationen in Dokumentationssprachen vom Thesaurus zum semantischen Netz Jessica Hubrich: Multilinguale Wissensorganisation im Zeitalter der Globalisierung: das Projekt CrissCross Vivien Petras: Heterogenitätsbehandlung und Terminology Mapping durch Crosskonkordanzen - eine Fallstudie Manfred Hauer, Uwe Leissing und Karl Rädler: Query-Expansion durch Fachthesauri Erfahrungsbericht zu dandelon.com, Vorarlberger Parlamentsinformationssystem und vorarlberg.at
    C. Begriffsarbeit in der Wissensorganisation Ingetraut Dahlberg: Begriffsarbeit in der Wissensorganisation Claudio Gnoli, Gabriele Merli, Gianni Pavan, Elisabetta Bernuzzi, and Marco Priano: Freely faceted classification for a Web-based bibliographic archive The BioAcoustic Reference Database Stefan Hauser: Terminologiearbeit im Bereich Wissensorganisation - Vergleich dreier Publikationen anhand der Darstellung des Themenkomplexes Thesaurus Daniel Kless: Erstellung eines allgemeinen Standards zur Wissensorganisation: Nutzen, Möglichkeiten, Herausforderungen, Wege D. Kommunikation und Lernen Gerald Beck und Simon Meissner: Strukturierung und Vermittlung von heterogenen (Nicht-)Wissensbeständen in der Risikokommunikation Angelo Chianese, Francesca Cantone, Mario Caropreso, and Vincenzo Moscato: ARCHAEOLOGY 2.0: Cultural E-Learning tools and distributed repositories supported by SEMANTICA, a System for Learning Object Retrieval and Adaptive Courseware Generation for e-learning environments Sonja Hierl, Lydia Bauer, Nadja Böller und Josef Herget: Kollaborative Konzeption von Ontologien in der Hochschullehre: Theorie, Chancen und mögliche Umsetzung Marc Wilhelm Küster, Christoph Ludwig, Yahya Al-Haff und Andreas Aschenbrenner: TextGrid: eScholarship und der Fortschritt der Wissenschaft durch vernetzte Angebote
  3. Sieglerschmidt, J.: Wissensordnungen im analogen und im digitalen Zeitalter (2017) 0.06
    0.059344955 = product of:
      0.11868991 = sum of:
        0.11868991 = product of:
          0.7121394 = sum of:
            0.7121394 = weight(_text_:c3 in 4026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.7121394 = score(doc=4026,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.41313487 = queryWeight, product of:
                  9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04236856 = queryNorm
                1.7237456 = fieldWeight in 4026, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4026)
          0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl. unter: https://books.google.de/books?hl=de&lr=&id=0rtGDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA35&dq=inhaltserschlie%C3%9Fung+OR+sacherschlie%C3%9Fung&ots=5u0TwCbFqE&sig=GGw3Coc21CINkone-6Lx8LaSAjY#v=onepage&q=inhaltserschlie%C3%9Fung%20OR%20sacherschlie%C3%9Fung&f=false.
  4. Chang, Y.-W.; Huang, M.-H.: ¬A study of the evolution of interdisciplinarity in library and information science : using three bibliometric methods (2012) 0.05
    0.05461414 = sum of:
      0.011465322 = product of:
        0.06879193 = sum of:
          0.06879193 = weight(_text_:authors in 4959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06879193 = score(doc=4959,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.19315039 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04236856 = queryNorm
              0.35615736 = fieldWeight in 4959, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4959)
        0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
      0.04314882 = sum of:
        0.014447044 = weight(_text_:h in 4959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014447044 = score(doc=4959,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10526253 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04236856 = queryNorm
            0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 4959, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4959)
        0.028701775 = weight(_text_:22 in 4959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028701775 = score(doc=4959,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14836748 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04236856 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4959, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4959)
    
    Abstract
    This study uses three bibliometric methods: direct citation, bibliographic coupling, and co-authorship analysis, to investigate interdisciplinary changes in library and information science (LIS) from 1978 to 2007. The results reveal that LIS researchers most frequently cite publications in their own discipline. In addition, half of all co-authors of LIS articles are affiliated with LIS-related institutes. The results confirm that the degree of interdisciplinarity within LIS has increased, particularly co-authorship. However, the study found sources of direct citations in LIS articles are widely distributed across 30 disciplines, but co-authors of LIS articles are distributed across only 25 disciplines. The degree of interdisciplinarity was found ranging from 0.61 to 0.82 with citation to references in all articles being the highest and that of co-authorship being the lowest. Percentages of contribution attributable to LIS show a decreasing tendency based on the results of direct citation and co-authorship analysis, but an increasing tendency based on those of bibliographic coupling analysis. Such differences indicate each of the three bibliometric methods has its strength and provides insights respectively for viewing various aspects of interdisciplinarity, suggesting the use of no single bibliometric method can reveal all aspects of interdisciplinarity due to its multifaceted nature.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.1, S.22-33
  5. Gödert, W.; Lepsky, K.: Informationelle Kompetenz : ein humanistischer Entwurf (2019) 0.05
    0.05355581 = sum of:
      0.039253965 = product of:
        0.23552378 = sum of:
          0.23552378 = weight(_text_:3a in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.23552378 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.35920113 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04236856 = queryNorm
              0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
        0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
      0.014301842 = product of:
        0.028603684 = sum of:
          0.028603684 = weight(_text_:h in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.028603684 = score(doc=5955,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.10526253 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04236856 = queryNorm
              0.27173662 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Philosophisch-ethische Rezensionen vom 09.11.2019 (Jürgen Czogalla), Unter: https://philosophisch-ethische-rezensionen.de/rezension/Goedert1.html. In: B.I.T. online 23(2020) H.3, S.345-347 (W. Sühl-Strohmenger) [Unter: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.b-i-t-online.de%2Fheft%2F2020-03-rezensionen.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0iY3f_zNcvEjeZ6inHVnOK]. In: Open Password Nr. 805 vom 14.08.2020 (H.-C. Hobohm) [Unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzE0MywiOGI3NjZkZmNkZjQ1IiwwLDAsMTMxLDFd].
  6. EndNote X7 : bibliographies made easy [= Version 17] (2013) 0.05
    0.05177858 = product of:
      0.10355716 = sum of:
        0.10355716 = sum of:
          0.0346729 = weight(_text_:h in 1808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0346729 = score(doc=1808,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.10526253 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04236856 = queryNorm
              0.32939452 = fieldWeight in 1808, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1808)
          0.06888426 = weight(_text_:22 in 1808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06888426 = score(doc=1808,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14836748 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04236856 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1808, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1808)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    17. 9.2018 18:19:22
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Mitteilungen VOEB 67(2014) H.1, S.174-178 (O. Oberhauser)
  7. Deisseroth, K.: Lichtschalter im Gehirn (2011) 0.05
    0.05177858 = product of:
      0.10355716 = sum of:
        0.10355716 = sum of:
          0.0346729 = weight(_text_:h in 4248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0346729 = score(doc=4248,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.10526253 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04236856 = queryNorm
              0.32939452 = fieldWeight in 4248, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4248)
          0.06888426 = weight(_text_:22 in 4248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06888426 = score(doc=4248,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14836748 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04236856 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4248, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4248)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 2011, H.2, S.22-29
  8. Antos, G.: Wie Sprache Entscheidungen (vor)prägt : zum Einfluss und zur Rhetorik kollektiver Selbsttäuschungen (2014) 0.05
    0.05177858 = product of:
      0.10355716 = sum of:
        0.10355716 = sum of:
          0.0346729 = weight(_text_:h in 1489) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0346729 = score(doc=1489,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.10526253 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04236856 = queryNorm
              0.32939452 = fieldWeight in 1489, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1489)
          0.06888426 = weight(_text_:22 in 1489) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06888426 = score(doc=1489,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14836748 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04236856 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1489, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1489)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    6. 7.2014 18:22:33
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 65(2014) H.3, S.156-162
  9. Loos, A.: ¬Die Million ist geknackt (2015) 0.05
    0.05177858 = product of:
      0.10355716 = sum of:
        0.10355716 = sum of:
          0.0346729 = weight(_text_:h in 4208) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0346729 = score(doc=4208,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.10526253 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04236856 = queryNorm
              0.32939452 = fieldWeight in 4208, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4208)
          0.06888426 = weight(_text_:22 in 4208) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06888426 = score(doc=4208,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14836748 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04236856 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4208, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4208)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    7. 4.2015 17:22:03
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung. 2015, H.1, S.10-11
  10. Ceynowa, K.: Research Library Reloaded? : Überlegungen zur Zukunft der geisteswissenschaftlichen Forschungsbibliothek (2018) 0.05
    0.05177858 = product of:
      0.10355716 = sum of:
        0.10355716 = sum of:
          0.0346729 = weight(_text_:h in 4973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0346729 = score(doc=4973,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.10526253 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04236856 = queryNorm
              0.32939452 = fieldWeight in 4973, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4973)
          0.06888426 = weight(_text_:22 in 4973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06888426 = score(doc=4973,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14836748 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04236856 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4973, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4973)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    1. 2.2019 12:50:22
    Source
    Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 65(2018) H.1, S.3-7
  11. Hauer, M.: Tiefenindexierung im Bibliothekskatalog : 17 Jahre intelligentCAPTURE (2019) 0.05
    0.05177858 = product of:
      0.10355716 = sum of:
        0.10355716 = sum of:
          0.0346729 = weight(_text_:h in 5629) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0346729 = score(doc=5629,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.10526253 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04236856 = queryNorm
              0.32939452 = fieldWeight in 5629, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5629)
          0.06888426 = weight(_text_:22 in 5629) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06888426 = score(doc=5629,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14836748 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04236856 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5629, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5629)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    B.I.T.online. 22(2019) H.2, S.163-166
  12. Nielsen, M.: Neuronale Netze : Alpha Go - Computer lernen Intuition (2018) 0.05
    0.04913298 = product of:
      0.09826596 = sum of:
        0.09826596 = sum of:
          0.040862408 = weight(_text_:h in 4523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.040862408 = score(doc=4523,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.10526253 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04236856 = queryNorm
              0.3881952 = fieldWeight in 4523, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4523)
          0.05740355 = weight(_text_:22 in 4523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05740355 = score(doc=4523,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14836748 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04236856 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4523, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4523)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl. auch den Beitrag: Sokol, J.: Spielend lernen. In: Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 2018, H.11, S.72-76.
    Source
    Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 2018, H.1, S.22-27
  13. Gömpel, R.; Junger, U.; Niggemann, E.: Veränderungen im Erschließungskonzept der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek (2011) 0.04
    0.04402999 = product of:
      0.08805998 = sum of:
        0.08805998 = sum of:
          0.023115268 = weight(_text_:h in 1699) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.023115268 = score(doc=1699,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.10526253 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04236856 = queryNorm
              0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 1699, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1699)
          0.06494471 = weight(_text_:22 in 1699) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06494471 = score(doc=1699,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.14836748 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04236856 = queryNorm
              0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 1699, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1699)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Dialog mit Bibliotheken. 22(2010) H.1, S.20-22
  14. Willis, C.; Greenberg, J.; White, H.: Analysis and synthesis of metadata goals for scientific data (2012) 0.04
    0.04369131 = sum of:
      0.009172257 = product of:
        0.055033542 = sum of:
          0.055033542 = weight(_text_:authors in 367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.055033542 = score(doc=367,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.19315039 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04236856 = queryNorm
              0.28492588 = fieldWeight in 367, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=367)
        0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
      0.034519054 = sum of:
        0.011557634 = weight(_text_:h in 367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011557634 = score(doc=367,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10526253 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04236856 = queryNorm
            0.10979818 = fieldWeight in 367, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=367)
        0.022961421 = weight(_text_:22 in 367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022961421 = score(doc=367,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14836748 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04236856 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 367, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=367)
    
    Abstract
    The proliferation of discipline-specific metadata schemes contributes to artificial barriers that can impede interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research. The authors considered this problem by examining the domains, objectives, and architectures of nine metadata schemes used to document scientific data in the physical, life, and social sciences. They used a mixed-methods content analysis and Greenberg's () metadata objectives, principles, domains, and architectural layout (MODAL) framework, and derived 22 metadata-related goals from textual content describing each metadata scheme. Relationships are identified between the domains (e.g., scientific discipline and type of data) and the categories of scheme objectives. For each strong correlation (>0.6), a Fisher's exact test for nonparametric data was used to determine significance (p < .05). Significant relationships were found between the domains and objectives of the schemes. Schemes describing observational data are more likely to have "scheme harmonization" (compatibility and interoperability with related schemes) as an objective; schemes with the objective "abstraction" (a conceptual model exists separate from the technical implementation) also have the objective "sufficiency" (the scheme defines a minimal amount of information to meet the needs of the community); and schemes with the objective "data publication" do not have the objective "element refinement." The analysis indicates that many metadata-driven goals expressed by communities are independent of scientific discipline or the type of data, although they are constrained by historical community practices and workflows as well as the technological environment at the time of scheme creation. The analysis reveals 11 fundamental metadata goals for metadata documenting scientific data in support of sharing research data across disciplines and domains. The authors report these results and highlight the need for more metadata-related research, particularly in the context of recent funding agency policy changes.
  15. Burghardt, M.; Wolff, C.; Womser-Hacker, C.: Informationsinfrastruktur und informationswissenschaftliche Methoden in den digitalen Geisteswissenschaften (2015) 0.04
    0.04314882 = product of:
      0.08629764 = sum of:
        0.08629764 = sum of:
          0.028894087 = weight(_text_:h in 1838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.028894087 = score(doc=1838,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.10526253 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04236856 = queryNorm
              0.27449545 = fieldWeight in 1838, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1838)
          0.05740355 = weight(_text_:22 in 1838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05740355 = score(doc=1838,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14836748 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04236856 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1838, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1838)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    6.12.2015 17:22:08
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 66(2015) H.5/6, S.285-286
  16. Vosgerau, G.: Sprache und Denken (2011) 0.04
    0.04314882 = product of:
      0.08629764 = sum of:
        0.08629764 = sum of:
          0.028894087 = weight(_text_:h in 3823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.028894087 = score(doc=3823,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.10526253 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04236856 = queryNorm
              0.27449545 = fieldWeight in 3823, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3823)
          0.05740355 = weight(_text_:22 in 3823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05740355 = score(doc=3823,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14836748 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04236856 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3823, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3823)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    23. 7.2011 13:13:22
    Source
    Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 2011, H.8, S.56-60
  17. Raichle, M.E.: Im Kopf herrscht niemals Ruhe (2010) 0.04
    0.04314882 = product of:
      0.08629764 = sum of:
        0.08629764 = sum of:
          0.028894087 = weight(_text_:h in 3679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.028894087 = score(doc=3679,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.10526253 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04236856 = queryNorm
              0.27449545 = fieldWeight in 3679, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3679)
          0.05740355 = weight(_text_:22 in 3679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05740355 = score(doc=3679,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14836748 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04236856 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3679, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3679)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 6.2010 9:22:04
    Source
    Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 2010, H.6, S.60-66
  18. Ermert, A.: Terminologie - Bedeutung, Erarbeitung, professionelle Strukturierung und Management : Der 13. Deutsche Terminologietag vom 19. bis 21. April 2012 in Heidelberg (2012) 0.04
    0.04314882 = product of:
      0.08629764 = sum of:
        0.08629764 = sum of:
          0.028894087 = weight(_text_:h in 327) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.028894087 = score(doc=327,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.10526253 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04236856 = queryNorm
              0.27449545 = fieldWeight in 327, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=327)
          0.05740355 = weight(_text_:22 in 327) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05740355 = score(doc=327,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14836748 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04236856 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 327, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=327)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2012 19:37:29
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 63(2012) H.3, S.203-205
  19. Geiß, D.: Aus der Praxis der Patentinformation : Die Entwicklung der elektronischen Medien und Dienstleistungen bei den Patentbehörden und Internetprovidern im Jahr 2012 (2013) 0.04
    0.04314882 = product of:
      0.08629764 = sum of:
        0.08629764 = sum of:
          0.028894087 = weight(_text_:h in 658) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.028894087 = score(doc=658,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.10526253 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04236856 = queryNorm
              0.27449545 = fieldWeight in 658, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=658)
          0.05740355 = weight(_text_:22 in 658) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05740355 = score(doc=658,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14836748 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04236856 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 658, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=658)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2013 16:08:18
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 64(2013) H.1, S.39-48
  20. Delahaye, J.-P.: Big brother an der Hintertür (2018) 0.04
    0.04314882 = product of:
      0.08629764 = sum of:
        0.08629764 = sum of:
          0.028894087 = weight(_text_:h in 4190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.028894087 = score(doc=4190,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.10526253 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04236856 = queryNorm
              0.27449545 = fieldWeight in 4190, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4190)
          0.05740355 = weight(_text_:22 in 4190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05740355 = score(doc=4190,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14836748 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04236856 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4190, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4190)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2018 16:55:48
    Source
    Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 2018, H.3, S.72-77

Languages

  • e 1190
  • d 987
  • a 1
  • f 1
  • hu 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 1969
  • m 156
  • el 145
  • s 57
  • x 19
  • r 9
  • b 7
  • ag 1
  • i 1
  • n 1
  • z 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications