Search (656 results, page 1 of 33)

0.14441942 = product of:
  0.57767767 = sum of:
    0.57767767 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.57767767 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.51393163 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06061936 = queryNorm
        1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Content

Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.

0.12746125 = product of:
  0.2549225 = sum of:
    0.205644 = weight(_text_:bliss in 1428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.205644 = score(doc=1428,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.4336462 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06061936 = queryNorm
        0.4742207 = fieldWeight in 1428, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1428)
    0.04927852 = weight(_text_:22 in 1428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04927852 = score(doc=1428,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21227868 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06061936 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1428, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1428)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

The paper discusses the challenges of faceted vocabulary organization in universal classifications which treat the universe of knowledge as a coherent whole and in which the concepts and subjects in different disciplines are shared, related and combined. The authors illustrate the challenges of the facet analytical approach using, as an example, the revision of class 72 in UDC. The paper reports on the research undertaken in 2013 as preparation for the revision. This consisted of analysis of concept organization in the UDC schedules in comparison with the Art & Architecture Thesaurus and class W of the Bliss Bibliographic Classification. The paper illustrates how such research can contribute to a better understanding of the field and may lead to improvements in the facet structure of this segment of the UDC vocabulary.

Source

Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik

0.12746125 = product of:
  0.2549225 = sum of:
    0.205644 = weight(_text_:bliss in 2594) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.205644 = score(doc=2594,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.4336462 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06061936 = queryNorm
        0.4742207 = fieldWeight in 2594, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2594)
    0.04927852 = weight(_text_:22 in 2594) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04927852 = score(doc=2594,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21227868 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06061936 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2594, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2594)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Standard library classification systems like Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC), U.S. Library of Congress Classification (LCC), and Universal Decimal Classification (UDC) are internationally known and widely used by libraries as the tools for organizing information. Charles Ammi Cutter's Expansive Classification (EC), James Duff Brown's Subject Classification (SC), Henry E. Bliss' Bibliographic Classification (BC), and S. R. Ranganathan's Colon Classification (CC) also are standard classification systems, but they are less commonly used compared to aforementioned three systems. All these systems are easy to use and convenient for most general collection libraries. However, these systems are not adequate for some special collections. Libraries with rich collections on Islam also face problems while using these systems, although such libraries often use expansions in the original systems for their collections. This paper examines this problem and presents a potential optimal solution. The author collected data, using a semistructured interview technique, from a representative sample of thirty libraries in eight countries with strong collections in Islam. These data were analyzed employing qualitative methods.

Date

10. 9.2000 17:38:22

0.12034953 = product of:
  0.4813981 = sum of:
    0.4813981 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.4813981 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.51393163 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06061936 = queryNorm
        0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja

0.08424467 = product of:
  0.33697867 = sum of:
    0.33697867 = weight(_text_:3a in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.33697867 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.51393163 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06061936 = queryNorm
        0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Footnote

Rez. in: Philosophisch-ethische Rezensionen vom 09.11.2019 (Jürgen Czogalla), Unter: https://philosophisch-ethische-rezensionen.de/rezension/Goedert1.html. In: B.I.T. online 23(2020) H.3, S.345-347 (W. Sühl-Strohmenger) [Unter: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.b-i-t-online.de%2Fheft%2F2020-03-rezensionen.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0iY3f_zNcvEjeZ6inHVnOK]. In: Open Password Nr. 805 vom 14.08.2020 (H.-C. Hobohm) [Unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzE0MywiOGI3NjZkZmNkZjQ1IiwwLDAsMTMxLDFd].

0.07220971 = product of:
  0.28883883 = sum of:
    0.28883883 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.28883883 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.51393163 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06061936 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Content

Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.

0.07220971 = product of:
  0.28883883 = sum of:
    0.28883883 = weight(_text_:3a in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.28883883 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.51393163 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06061936 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Footnote

https%3A%2F%2Fjournals.univie.ac.at%2Findex.php%2Fvoebm%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F5332%2F5271%2F&usg=AOvVaw2yQdFGHlmOwVls7ANCpTii.

0.060174763 = product of:
  0.24069905 = sum of:
    0.24069905 = weight(_text_:3a in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.24069905 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.51393163 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06061936 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Content

PhD Dissertation at International Doctorate School in Information and Communication Technology. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fcore.ac.uk%2Fdownload%2Fpdf%2F150083013.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2n-qisNagpyT0lli_6QbAQ.

0.060174763 = product of:
  0.24069905 = sum of:
    0.24069905 = weight(_text_:3a in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.24069905 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.51393163 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06061936 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Footnote

Vgl. unter: https://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwizweHljdbcAhVS16QKHXcFD9QQFjABegQICRAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Fpublication%2F271200105_Die_Autonomie_des_Menschen_und_der_Maschine_-_gegenwartige_Definitionen_von_Autonomie_zwischen_philosophischem_Hintergrund_und_technologischer_Umsetzbarkeit_Redigierte_Version_der_Magisterarbeit_Karls&usg=AOvVaw06orrdJmFF2xbCCp_hL26q.

0.060174763 = product of:
  0.24069905 = sum of:
    0.24069905 = weight(_text_:3a in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.24069905 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.51393163 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06061936 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Content

Vgl. auch: New automatic interpreter for complex UDC numbers. Unter: <https%3A%2F%2Fudcc.org%2Ffiles%2FAttilaPiros_EC_36-37_2014-2015.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3kc9CwDDCWP7aArpfjrs5b>

0.051411 = product of:
  0.205644 = sum of:
    0.205644 = weight(_text_:bliss in 3357) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.205644 = score(doc=3357,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.4336462 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06061936 = queryNorm
        0.4742207 = fieldWeight in 3357, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3357)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Pragmatism is a metatheoretical perspective within knowledge organization (KO) that derives from an American philosophical tradition active since the late 19th century. Its core feature is commitment to the evaluation of the adequacy of concepts and beliefs through the empirical test of practice: this entails epistemological antifoundationalism, fallibilism, contingency, social embeddedness, and pluralism. This article reviews three variants of Pragmatism that have been historically influential in philosophy-Charles Sanders Pierce's scientifically oriented pragmaticism, William James's subjectivist practicalism, and John Dewey's socially oriented instrumentalism-and indicates points of contact between them and KO theories propounded by Henry E. Bliss, Jesse H. Shera, and Birger Hjørland, respectively. KO applications of classical Pragmatism have tended to converge toward a socially pluralist model characteristic of Dewey. Recently, Richard Rorty's post-modern brand of Neopragmatism has found adherents within KO: whether it provides a more advantageous metatheoretical framework than classical Pragmatism remains to be seen.

0.051411 = product of:
  0.205644 = sum of:
    0.205644 = weight(_text_:bliss in 4650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.205644 = score(doc=4650,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.4336462 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06061936 = queryNorm
        0.4742207 = fieldWeight in 4650, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4650)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Notations are systems of symbols that can be combined according to syntactical rules to represent meanings in a specialized domain. In knowledge organization, they are systems of numerals, letters and punctuation marks associated to a concept that mechanically produce helpful sequences of them for arranging books on shelves, browsing subjects in directories and displaying items in catalogues. Most bibliographic classification systems, like Dewey Decimal Classification, use a positional notation allowing for expression of increasingly specific subjects by additional digits. However, some notations like that of Bliss Bibliographic Classification are purely ordinal and do not reflect the hierarchical degree of a subject. Notations can also be expressive of the syntactical structure of compound subjects (common auxiliaries, facets etc.) in various ways. In the digital media, notation can be recorded and managed in databases and exploited to provide appropriate search and display functionalities.

0.04813981 = product of:
  0.19255924 = sum of:
    0.19255924 = weight(_text_:3a in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19255924 = score(doc=5820,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.51393163 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06061936 = queryNorm
        0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Content

Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Language and Information Technologies. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cs.cmu.edu%2F~cx%2Fpapers%2Fknowledge_based_text_representation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0SaTSvhWLTh__Uz_HtOtl3.

0.0428425 = product of:
  0.17137 = sum of:
    0.17137 = weight(_text_:bliss in 4065) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17137 = score(doc=4065,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.4336462 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06061936 = queryNorm
        0.3951839 = fieldWeight in 4065, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4065)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Recent revision of UDC classes has aimed at implementing a more faceted approach. Many compound classes have been removed from the main tables, and more radical revisions of classes (particularly those for Medicine and Religion) have introduced a rigorous analysis, a clearer sense of citation order, and building of compound classes according to a more logical system syntax. The faceted approach provides a means of formalizing the relationships in the classification and making them explicit for machine recognition. In the Bliss Bibliographic Classification (BC2) (which has been a source for both UDC classes mentioned above), terminologies are encoded for automatic generation of hierarchical and associative relationships. Nevertheless, difficulties are encountered in vocabulary control, and a similar phenomenon is observed in UDC. Current work has revealed differences in the vocabulary of humanities and science, notably the way in which terms in the humanities should be handled when these are semantically complex. Achieving a balance between rigour in the structure of the classification and the complexity of natural language expression remains partially unresolved at present, but provides a fertile field for further research.

0.0428425 = product of:
  0.17137 = sum of:
    0.17137 = weight(_text_:bliss in 4826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17137 = score(doc=4826,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.4336462 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06061936 = queryNorm
        0.3951839 = fieldWeight in 4826, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4826)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Facet analysis is proposed as a general theory of knowledge organization, with an associated methodology that may be applied to the development of terminology tools in a variety of contexts and formats. Faceted classifications originated as a means of representing complexity in semantic content that facilitates logical organization and effective retrieval in a physical environment. This is achieved through meticulous analysis of concepts, their structural and functional status (based on fundamental categories), and their inter-relationships. These features provide an excellent basis for the general conceptual modelling of domains, and for the generation of KOS other than systematic classifications. This is demonstrated by the adoption of a faceted approach to many web search and visualization tools, and by the emergence of a facet based methodology for the construction of thesauri. Current work on the Bliss Bibliographic Classification (Second Edition) is investigating the ways in which the full complexity of faceted structures may be represented through encoded data, capable of generating intellectually and mechanically compatible forms of indexing tools from a single source. It is suggested that a number of research questions relating to the Semantic Web could be tackled through the medium of facet analysis.

0.0428425 = product of:
  0.17137 = sum of:
    0.17137 = weight(_text_:bliss in 2720) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17137 = score(doc=2720,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.4336462 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06061936 = queryNorm
        0.3951839 = fieldWeight in 2720, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2720)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

The facet-analytic paradigm is probably the most distinct approach to knowledge organization within Library and Information Science, and in many ways it has dominated what has be termed "modern classification theory". It was mainly developed by S.R. Ranganathan and the British Classification Research Group, but it is mostly based on principles of logical division developed more than two millennia ago. Colon Classification (CC) and Bliss 2 (BC2) are among the most important systems developed on this theoretical basis, but it has also influenced the development of other systems, such as the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) and is also applied in many websites. It still has a strong position in the field and it is the most explicit and "pure" theoretical approach to knowledge organization (KO) (but it is not by implication necessarily also the most important one). The strength of this approach is its logical principles and the way it provides structures in knowledge organization systems (KOS). The main weaknesses are (1) its lack of empirical basis and (2) its speculative ordering of knowledge without basis in the development or influence of theories and socio-historical studies. It seems to be based on the problematic assumption that relations between concepts are a priori and not established by the development of models, theories and laws.

0.032852348 = product of:
  0.13140939 = sum of:
    0.13140939 = weight(_text_:22 in 2851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13140939 = score(doc=2851,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21227868 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06061936 = queryNorm
        0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2851, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2851)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

20. 1.2015 18:30:22

0.029037647 = product of:
  0.11615059 = sum of:
    0.11615059 = weight(_text_:22 in 2810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11615059 = score(doc=2810,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.21227868 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06061936 = queryNorm
        0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 2810, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2810)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

22. 7.2004 9:42:33
22. 4.2017 11:58:05

0.029037647 = product of:
  0.11615059 = sum of:
    0.11615059 = weight(_text_:22 in 3582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11615059 = score(doc=3582,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.21227868 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06061936 = queryNorm
        0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3582, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3582)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

22. 4.2017 10:42:05
22. 4.2017 10:48:38

0.029037647 = product of:
  0.11615059 = sum of:
    0.11615059 = weight(_text_:22 in 3975) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11615059 = score(doc=3975,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.21227868 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06061936 = queryNorm
        0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3975, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3975)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

22. 2.2018 12:06:44
22. 2.2018 12:13:53