Search (4813 results, page 1 of 241)

  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014) 0.10 
    0.102916755 = sum of:
  0.09732189 = product of:
    0.38928756 = sum of:
      0.38928756 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.38928756 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.41559613 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049020473 = queryNorm
          0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.0055948654 = product of:
    0.011189731 = sum of:
      0.011189731 = weight(_text_:e in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.011189731 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.07046056 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049020473 = queryNorm
          0.15880844 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    e
    Source
    http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
  2. Nehmadi, L.; Meyer, J.; Parmet, Y.; Ben-Asher, N.: Predicting a screen area's perceived importance from spatial and physical attributes (2011) 0.07 
    0.06899877 = sum of:
  0.06564185 = product of:
    0.2625674 = sum of:
      0.2625674 = weight(_text_:editor's in 4757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.2625674 = score(doc=4757,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.44063705 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.988837 = idf(docFreq=14, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049020473 = queryNorm
          0.59588134 = fieldWeight in 4757, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.988837 = idf(docFreq=14, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4757)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.0033569192 = product of:
    0.0067138383 = sum of:
      0.0067138383 = weight(_text_:e in 4757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0067138383 = score(doc=4757,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.07046056 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049020473 = queryNorm
          0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 4757, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4757)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The editor's decision where and how to place items on a screen is crucial for the design of information displays, such as websites. We developed a statistical model that can facilitate automating this process by predicting the perceived importance of screen items from their location and size. The model was developed based on a 2-step experiment in which we asked participants to rate the importance of text articles that differed in size, screen location, and title size. Articles were either presented for 0.5 seconds or for unlimited time. In a stepwise regression analysis, the model's variables accounted for 65% of the variance in the importance ratings. In a validation study, the model predicted 85% of the variance of the mean apparent importance of screen items. The model also predicted individual raters' importance perception ratings. We discuss the implications of such a model in the context of automating layout generation. An automated system for layout generation can optimize data presentation to suit users' individual information and display preferences.
    Language
    e
  3. Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019) 0.06 
    0.061750047 = sum of:
  0.05839313 = product of:
    0.23357251 = sum of:
      0.23357251 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.23357251 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.41559613 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049020473 = queryNorm
          0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.0033569192 = product of:
    0.0067138383 = sum of:
      0.0067138383 = weight(_text_:e in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0067138383 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.07046056 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049020473 = queryNorm
          0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
    Language
    e
  4. Arazy, O.; Stroulia, E.; Ruecker, S.; Arias, C.; Fiorentino, C.; Ganev, V.; Yau, T.: Recognizing contributions in wikis : authorship categories, algorithms, and visualizations (2010) 0.06 
    0.05865771 = sum of:
  0.05470154 = product of:
    0.21880616 = sum of:
      0.21880616 = weight(_text_:editor's in 3467) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.21880616 = score(doc=3467,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.44063705 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.988837 = idf(docFreq=14, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049020473 = queryNorm
          0.4965678 = fieldWeight in 3467, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.988837 = idf(docFreq=14, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3467)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.0039561675 = product of:
    0.007912335 = sum of:
      0.007912335 = weight(_text_:e in 3467) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.007912335 = score(doc=3467,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.07046056 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049020473 = queryNorm
          0.112294525 = fieldWeight in 3467, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3467)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Wikis are designed to support collaborative editing, without focusing on individual contribution, such that it is not straightforward to determine who contributed to a specific page. However, as wikis are increasingly adopted in settings such as business, government, and education, where editors are largely driven by career goals, there is a perceived need to modify wikis so that each editor's contributions are clearly presented. In this paper we introduce an approach for assessing the contributions of wiki editors along several authorship categories, as well as a variety of information glyphs for visualizing this information. We report on three types of analysis: (a) assessing the accuracy of the algorithms, (b) estimating the understandability of the visualizations, and (c) exploring wiki editors' perceptions regarding the extent to which such an approach is likely to change their behavior. Our findings demonstrate that our proposed automated techniques can estimate fairly accurately the quantity of editors' contributions across various authorship categories, and that the visualizations we introduced can clearly convey this information to users. Moreover, our user study suggests that such tools are likely to change wiki editors' behavior. We discuss both the potential benefits and risks associated with solutions for estimating and visualizing wiki contributions.
    Language
    e
  5. Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011) 0.06 
    0.05839313 = product of:
  0.11678626 = sum of:
    0.11678626 = product of:
      0.46714503 = sum of:
        0.46714503 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.46714503 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.41559613 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049020473 = queryNorm
            1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
  6. García, J.A.; Rodriguez-Sánchez, R.; Fdez-Valdivia, J.: ¬The principal-agent problem in peer review : an interactionist perspective on everyday use of biomedical information (2015) 0.06 
    0.057498973 = sum of:
  0.05470154 = product of:
    0.21880616 = sum of:
      0.21880616 = weight(_text_:editor's in 1638) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.21880616 = score(doc=1638,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.44063705 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.988837 = idf(docFreq=14, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049020473 = queryNorm
          0.4965678 = fieldWeight in 1638, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.988837 = idf(docFreq=14, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1638)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.0027974327 = product of:
    0.0055948654 = sum of:
      0.0055948654 = weight(_text_:e in 1638) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0055948654 = score(doc=1638,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.07046056 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049020473 = queryNorm
          0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 1638, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1638)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    In economics, the principal-agent problem is the difficulty in motivating one party (the agent), to act in the best interests of another (the principal) rather than in his own interests. We consider the example of a journal editor (the principal) wondering whether his or her reviewer (the agent) is recommending rejection of a manuscript because it does not have enough quality to be published or because the reviewer dislikes effort and he/she must work to acquire in-depth knowledge of the content of the manuscript. The reviewer's effort provides him or her with superior information about a manuscript's quality. If this information is not correctly communicated, the reviewer has more information when compared with the journal editor. This inherently leads to an encouragement of moral hazard, where the editor will not know whether the reviewer has done his or her job in accordance to the editor's interest. Prescriptions need to be given as to how the journal editor should control the reviewers to curb self-interest. Besides the associate editors monitoring the peer-review process, incentives can be employed to limit moral hazard on the part of the reviewer. Drawing on agency theory, we examine the incentives motivating the reviewers to expend effort to generate information about the quality of submissions. This model predicts that for reviewers early in their careers, promotion-based incentives may mean there is no need for within-job incentives, but also that within-job rewards for a referee's performance should depend on individual differences in ability and promotion opportunities.
    Language
    e
  7. García, J.A.; Rodriguez-Sánchez, R.; Fdez-Valdivia, J.: Adverse selection of reviewers (2015) 0.06 
    0.057498973 = sum of:
  0.05470154 = product of:
    0.21880616 = sum of:
      0.21880616 = weight(_text_:editor's in 1859) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.21880616 = score(doc=1859,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.44063705 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.988837 = idf(docFreq=14, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049020473 = queryNorm
          0.4965678 = fieldWeight in 1859, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.988837 = idf(docFreq=14, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1859)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.0027974327 = product of:
    0.0055948654 = sum of:
      0.0055948654 = weight(_text_:e in 1859) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0055948654 = score(doc=1859,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.07046056 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049020473 = queryNorm
          0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 1859, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1859)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Adverse selection occurs when a firm signs a contract with a potential worker but his/her key skills are still not known at that time, which leads the employer to make a wrong decision. In this article, we study the example of adverse selection of reviewers when a potential referee whose ability is his private information faces a finite sequence of review processes for several scholarly journals, one after the other. Our editor's problem is to design a system that guarantees that each manuscript is reviewed by a referee if and only if the reviewer's ability matches the review's complexity. As is typically the case in solving problems of adverse selection in agency theory, the journal editor offers a menu of contracts to the potential referee, from which the reviewer chooses the contract that is best for him given his ability. The optimal contract will be the one that provides the right incentives to match the complexity of the review and the ability of the reviewer. The payment of contracts is made through a proportional increment of the reviewer factor, which measures the importance of reviewers to their field.
    Language
    e
  8. Cronin, B.: Thinking about data (2013) 0.05 
    0.054323994 = product of:
  0.10864799 = sum of:
    0.10864799 = sum of:
      0.015665622 = weight(_text_:e in 4347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.015665622 = score(doc=4347,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.07046056 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049020473 = queryNorm
          0.2223318 = fieldWeight in 4347, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4347)
      0.09298237 = weight(_text_:22 in 4347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.09298237 = score(doc=4347,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17166135 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049020473 = queryNorm
          0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4347, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4347)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 3.2013 16:18:36
    Language
    e
  9. Grudin, J.: Human-computer interaction (2011) 0.05 
    0.054323994 = product of:
  0.10864799 = sum of:
    0.10864799 = sum of:
      0.015665622 = weight(_text_:e in 1601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.015665622 = score(doc=1601,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.07046056 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049020473 = queryNorm
          0.2223318 = fieldWeight in 1601, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1601)
      0.09298237 = weight(_text_:22 in 1601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.09298237 = score(doc=1601,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17166135 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049020473 = queryNorm
          0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1601, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1601)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    27.12.2014 18:54:22
    Language
    e
  10. Farazi, M.: Faceted lightweight ontologies : a formalization and some experiments (2010) 0.05 
    0.051458377 = sum of:
  0.048660945 = product of:
    0.19464378 = sum of:
      0.19464378 = weight(_text_:3a in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.19464378 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.41559613 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049020473 = queryNorm
          0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.0027974327 = product of:
    0.0055948654 = sum of:
      0.0055948654 = weight(_text_:e in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0055948654 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.07046056 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049020473 = queryNorm
          0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    PhD Dissertation at International Doctorate School in Information and Communication Technology. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fcore.ac.uk%2Fdownload%2Fpdf%2F150083013.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2n-qisNagpyT0lli_6QbAQ.
    Language
    e
  11. Shala, E.: ¬Die Autonomie des Menschen und der Maschine : gegenwärtige Definitionen von Autonomie zwischen philosophischem Hintergrund und technologischer Umsetzbarkeit (2014) 0.05 
    0.051458377 = sum of:
  0.048660945 = product of:
    0.19464378 = sum of:
      0.19464378 = weight(_text_:3a in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.19464378 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.41559613 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049020473 = queryNorm
          0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.0027974327 = product of:
    0.0055948654 = sum of:
      0.0055948654 = weight(_text_:e in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0055948654 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.07046056 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049020473 = queryNorm
          0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Vgl. unter: https://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwizweHljdbcAhVS16QKHXcFD9QQFjABegQICRAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Fpublication%2F271200105_Die_Autonomie_des_Menschen_und_der_Maschine_-_gegenwartige_Definitionen_von_Autonomie_zwischen_philosophischem_Hintergrund_und_technologischer_Umsetzbarkeit_Redigierte_Version_der_Magisterarbeit_Karls&usg=AOvVaw06orrdJmFF2xbCCp_hL26q.
  12. Bursa, O. et al.: Enriching preferences using DBpedia and Wordnet (2016) 0.05 
    0.049344383 = product of:
  0.09868877 = sum of:
    0.09868877 = sum of:
      0.018989604 = weight(_text_:e in 3276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.018989604 = score(doc=3276,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.07046056 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049020473 = queryNorm
          0.26950687 = fieldWeight in 3276, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3276)
      0.079699166 = weight(_text_:22 in 3276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.079699166 = score(doc=3276,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17166135 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049020473 = queryNorm
          0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3276, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3276)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    e
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
  13. Williamson, N.J.: Classification issues in 2011 : report (2012) 0.05 
    0.04656342 = product of:
  0.09312684 = sum of:
    0.09312684 = sum of:
      0.013427677 = weight(_text_:e in 6224) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.013427677 = score(doc=6224,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.07046056 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049020473 = queryNorm
          0.19057012 = fieldWeight in 6224, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6224)
      0.079699166 = weight(_text_:22 in 6224) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.079699166 = score(doc=6224,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17166135 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049020473 = queryNorm
          0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6224, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6224)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 1.2012 13:17:00
    Language
    e
  14. Cronin, B.: ¬The writing on the wall (2015) 0.05 
    0.04656342 = product of:
  0.09312684 = sum of:
    0.09312684 = sum of:
      0.013427677 = weight(_text_:e in 7297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.013427677 = score(doc=7297,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.07046056 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049020473 = queryNorm
          0.19057012 = fieldWeight in 7297, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7297)
      0.079699166 = weight(_text_:22 in 7297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.079699166 = score(doc=7297,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17166135 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049020473 = queryNorm
          0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 7297, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7297)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    26. 4.2015 19:27:22
    Language
    e
  15. Xiao, G.: ¬A knowledge classification model based on the relationship between science and human needs (2013) 0.05 
    0.04656342 = product of:
  0.09312684 = sum of:
    0.09312684 = sum of:
      0.013427677 = weight(_text_:e in 138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.013427677 = score(doc=138,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.07046056 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049020473 = queryNorm
          0.19057012 = fieldWeight in 138, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=138)
      0.079699166 = weight(_text_:22 in 138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.079699166 = score(doc=138,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17166135 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049020473 = queryNorm
          0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 138, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=138)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 2.2013 12:36:34
    Language
    e
  16. Szostak, R.: Speaking truth to power in classification : response to Fox's review of my work; KO 39:4, 300 (2013) 0.05 
    0.04656342 = product of:
  0.09312684 = sum of:
    0.09312684 = sum of:
      0.013427677 = weight(_text_:e in 591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.013427677 = score(doc=591,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.07046056 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049020473 = queryNorm
          0.19057012 = fieldWeight in 591, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=591)
      0.079699166 = weight(_text_:22 in 591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.079699166 = score(doc=591,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17166135 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049020473 = queryNorm
          0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 591, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=591)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 2.2013 12:35:05
    Language
    e
  17. Marx, W.; Bornmann, L.: On the problems of dealing with bibliometric data (2014) 0.05 
    0.04656342 = product of:
  0.09312684 = sum of:
    0.09312684 = sum of:
      0.013427677 = weight(_text_:e in 1239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.013427677 = score(doc=1239,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.07046056 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049020473 = queryNorm
          0.19057012 = fieldWeight in 1239, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1239)
      0.079699166 = weight(_text_:22 in 1239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.079699166 = score(doc=1239,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17166135 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049020473 = queryNorm
          0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1239, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1239)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    18. 3.2014 19:13:22
    Language
    e
  18. Sauperl, S.A.: UDC as a standardisation method for providing titles of documents (2015) 0.05 
    0.04656342 = product of:
  0.09312684 = sum of:
    0.09312684 = sum of:
      0.013427677 = weight(_text_:e in 2302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.013427677 = score(doc=2302,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.07046056 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049020473 = queryNorm
          0.19057012 = fieldWeight in 2302, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2302)
      0.079699166 = weight(_text_:22 in 2302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.079699166 = score(doc=2302,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17166135 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049020473 = queryNorm
          0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2302, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2302)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    10.11.2015 10:22:31
    Language
    e
  19. Castro, A. de: Mental models may fail when faced with self-referential descriptors (2016) 0.05 
    0.04656342 = product of:
  0.09312684 = sum of:
    0.09312684 = sum of:
      0.013427677 = weight(_text_:e in 2485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.013427677 = score(doc=2485,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.07046056 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049020473 = queryNorm
          0.19057012 = fieldWeight in 2485, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2485)
      0.079699166 = weight(_text_:22 in 2485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.079699166 = score(doc=2485,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17166135 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049020473 = queryNorm
          0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2485, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2485)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 1.2016 14:45:01
    Language
    e
  20. Shaw, R.; Golden, P.; Buckland, M.: Using linked library data in working research notes (2015) 0.05 
    0.04656342 = product of:
  0.09312684 = sum of:
    0.09312684 = sum of:
      0.013427677 = weight(_text_:e in 2555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.013427677 = score(doc=2555,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.07046056 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049020473 = queryNorm
          0.19057012 = fieldWeight in 2555, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2555)
      0.079699166 = weight(_text_:22 in 2555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.079699166 = score(doc=2555,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17166135 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049020473 = queryNorm
          0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2555, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2555)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    15. 1.2016 19:22:28
    Language
    e

Authors

Languages

  • e 4437
  • d 365
  • i 2
  • a 1
  • hu 1
  • pt 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 4306
  • el 379
  • m 321
  • s 90
  • x 30
  • r 16
  • n 11
  • b 8
  • i 4
  • ag 2
  • l 1
  • p 1
  • v 1
  • z 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications