Search (886 results, page 1 of 45)

  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011) 0.22 
    0.21886678 = product of:
  0.54716694 = sum of:
    0.13679174 = product of:
      0.41037518 = sum of:
        0.41037518 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.41037518 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.36509076 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043063257 = queryNorm
            1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.41037518 = weight(_text_:2f in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.41037518 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.36509076 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043063257 = queryNorm
        1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
  2. Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014) 0.18 
    0.18238898 = product of:
  0.45597243 = sum of:
    0.11399311 = product of:
      0.34197932 = sum of:
        0.34197932 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.34197932 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.36509076 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043063257 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.34197932 = weight(_text_:2f in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.34197932 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.36509076 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043063257 = queryNorm
        0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Source
    http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
  3. Suchenwirth, L.: Sacherschliessung in Zeiten von Corona : neue Herausforderungen und Chancen (2019) 0.14 
    0.14342998 = product of:
  0.35857493 = sum of:
    0.06839587 = product of:
      0.20518759 = sum of:
        0.20518759 = weight(_text_:3a in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20518759 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.36509076 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043063257 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.29017907 = weight(_text_:2f in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.29017907 = score(doc=484,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.36509076 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043063257 = queryNorm
        0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Footnote
    https%3A%2F%2Fjournals.univie.ac.at%2Findex.php%2Fvoebm%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F5332%2F5271%2F&usg=AOvVaw2yQdFGHlmOwVls7ANCpTii.
  4. Hallonsten, O.; Holmberg, D.: Analyzing structural stratification in the Swedish higher education system : data contextualization with policy-history analysis (2013) 0.13 
    0.13161041 = product of:
  0.21935067 = sum of:
    0.12933885 = weight(_text_:education in 668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12933885 = score(doc=668,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.20288157 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043063257 = queryNorm
        0.6375091 = fieldWeight in 668, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=668)
    0.075425625 = weight(_text_:great in 668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.075425625 = score(doc=668,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2424797 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043063257 = queryNorm
        0.31105953 = fieldWeight in 668, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=668)
    0.014586192 = product of:
      0.029172383 = sum of:
        0.029172383 = weight(_text_:22 in 668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029172383 = score(doc=668,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15080018 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043063257 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 668, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=668)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Abstract
    20th century massification of higher education and research in academia is said to have produced structurally stratified higher education systems in many countries. Most manifestly, the research mission of universities appears to be divisive. Authors have claimed that the Swedish system, while formally unified, has developed into a binary state, and statistics seem to support this conclusion. This article makes use of a comprehensive statistical data source on Swedish higher education institutions to illustrate stratification, and uses literature on Swedish research policy history to contextualize the statistics. Highlighting the opportunities as well as constraints of the data, the article argues that there is great merit in combining statistics with a qualitative analysis when studying the structural characteristics of national higher education systems. Not least the article shows that it is an over-simplification to describe the Swedish system as binary; the stratification is more complex. On basis of the analysis, the article also argues that while global trends certainly influence national developments, higher education systems have country-specific features that may enrich the understanding of how systems evolve and therefore should be analyzed as part of a broader study of the increasingly globalized academic system.
    Date
    22. 3.2013 19:43:01
  5. Wakeling, S.; Spezi, V.; Fry, J.; Creaser, C.; Pinfield, S.; Willett, P.: Academic communities : the role of journals and open-access mega-journals in scholarly communication (2019) 0.13 
    0.1298067 = product of:
  0.21634448 = sum of:
    0.074673824 = weight(_text_:education in 4627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.074673824 = score(doc=4627,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.20288157 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043063257 = queryNorm
        0.36806607 = fieldWeight in 4627, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4627)
    0.075425625 = weight(_text_:great in 4627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.075425625 = score(doc=4627,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2424797 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043063257 = queryNorm
        0.31105953 = fieldWeight in 4627, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4627)
    0.06624503 = product of:
      0.13249005 = sum of:
        0.13249005 = weight(_text_:britain in 4627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13249005 = score(doc=4627,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.32137164 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.462781 = idf(docFreq=68, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043063257 = queryNorm
            0.4122643 = fieldWeight in 4627, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.462781 = idf(docFreq=68, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4627)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Abstract
    Purpose The purpose of this paper is to provide insights into publication practices from the perspective of academics working within four disciplinary communities: biosciences, astronomy/physics, education and history. The paper explores the ways in which these multiple overlapping communities intersect with the journal landscape and the implications for the adoption and use of new players in the scholarly communication system, particularly open-access mega-journals (OAMJs). OAMJs (e.g. PLOS ONE and Scientific Reports) are large, broad scope, open-access journals that base editorial decisions solely on the technical/scientific soundness of the article. Design/methodology/approach Focus groups with active researchers in these fields were held in five UK Higher Education Institutions across Great Britain, and were complemented by interviews with pro-vice-chancellors for research at each institution. Findings A strong finding to emerge from the data is the notion of researchers belonging to multiple overlapping communities, with some inherent tensions in meeting the requirements for these different audiences. Researcher perceptions of evaluation mechanisms were found to play a major role in attitudes towards OAMJs, and interviews with the pro-vice-chancellors for research indicate that there is a difference between researchers' perceptions and the values embedded in institutional frameworks. Originality/value This is the first purely qualitative study relating to researcher perspectives on OAMJs. The findings of the paper will be of interest to publishers, policy-makers, research managers and academics.
  6. Gödert, W.; Lepsky, K.: Informationelle Kompetenz : ein humanistischer Entwurf (2019) 0.13 
    0.1276723 = product of:
  0.31918073 = sum of:
    0.07979518 = product of:
      0.23938553 = sum of:
        0.23938553 = weight(_text_:3a in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.23938553 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.36509076 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043063257 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.23938553 = weight(_text_:2f in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.23938553 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.36509076 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043063257 = queryNorm
        0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Philosophisch-ethische Rezensionen vom 09.11.2019 (Jürgen Czogalla), Unter: https://philosophisch-ethische-rezensionen.de/rezension/Goedert1.html. In: B.I.T. online 23(2020) H.3, S.345-347 (W. Sühl-Strohmenger) [Unter: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.b-i-t-online.de%2Fheft%2F2020-03-rezensionen.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0iY3f_zNcvEjeZ6inHVnOK]. In: Open Password Nr. 805 vom 14.08.2020 (H.-C. Hobohm) [Unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzE0MywiOGI3NjZkZmNkZjQ1IiwwLDAsMTMxLDFd].
  7. Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019) 0.11 
    0.10943339 = product of:
  0.27358347 = sum of:
    0.06839587 = product of:
      0.20518759 = sum of:
        0.20518759 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20518759 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.36509076 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043063257 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.20518759 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20518759 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.36509076 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043063257 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Content
    Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
  8. Xiong, C.: Knowledge based text representations for information retrieval (2016) 0.10 
    0.09561999 = product of:
  0.23904997 = sum of:
    0.045597248 = product of:
      0.13679174 = sum of:
        0.13679174 = weight(_text_:3a in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13679174 = score(doc=5820,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.36509076 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043063257 = queryNorm
            0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.19345272 = weight(_text_:2f in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19345272 = score(doc=5820,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.36509076 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043063257 = queryNorm
        0.5298757 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Content
    Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Language and Information Technologies. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cs.cmu.edu%2F~cx%2Fpapers%2Fknowledge_based_text_representation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0SaTSvhWLTh__Uz_HtOtl3.
  9. Farazi, M.: Faceted lightweight ontologies : a formalization and some experiments (2010) 0.09 
    0.09119449 = product of:
  0.22798622 = sum of:
    0.056996554 = product of:
      0.17098966 = sum of:
        0.17098966 = weight(_text_:3a in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17098966 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.36509076 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043063257 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.17098966 = weight(_text_:2f in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17098966 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.36509076 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043063257 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Content
    PhD Dissertation at International Doctorate School in Information and Communication Technology. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fcore.ac.uk%2Fdownload%2Fpdf%2F150083013.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2n-qisNagpyT0lli_6QbAQ.
  10. Shala, E.: ¬Die Autonomie des Menschen und der Maschine : gegenwärtige Definitionen von Autonomie zwischen philosophischem Hintergrund und technologischer Umsetzbarkeit (2014) 0.09 
    0.09119449 = product of:
  0.22798622 = sum of:
    0.056996554 = product of:
      0.17098966 = sum of:
        0.17098966 = weight(_text_:3a in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17098966 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.36509076 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043063257 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.17098966 = weight(_text_:2f in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17098966 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.36509076 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043063257 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Footnote
    Vgl. unter: https://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwizweHljdbcAhVS16QKHXcFD9QQFjABegQICRAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Fpublication%2F271200105_Die_Autonomie_des_Menschen_und_der_Maschine_-_gegenwartige_Definitionen_von_Autonomie_zwischen_philosophischem_Hintergrund_und_technologischer_Umsetzbarkeit_Redigierte_Version_der_Magisterarbeit_Karls&usg=AOvVaw06orrdJmFF2xbCCp_hL26q.
  11. Piros, A.: Az ETO-jelzetek automatikus interpretálásának és elemzésének kérdései (2018) 0.09 
    0.09119449 = product of:
  0.22798622 = sum of:
    0.056996554 = product of:
      0.17098966 = sum of:
        0.17098966 = weight(_text_:3a in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17098966 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.36509076 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043063257 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.17098966 = weight(_text_:2f in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17098966 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.36509076 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043063257 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Content
    Vgl. auch: New automatic interpreter for complex UDC numbers. Unter: <https%3A%2F%2Fudcc.org%2Ffiles%2FAttilaPiros_EC_36-37_2014-2015.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3kc9CwDDCWP7aArpfjrs5b>
  12. Huo, W.: Automatic multi-word term extraction and its application to Web-page summarization (2012) 0.09 
    0.08907641 = product of:
  0.22269101 = sum of:
    0.20518759 = weight(_text_:2f in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20518759 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.36509076 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043063257 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
    0.01750343 = product of:
      0.03500686 = sum of:
        0.03500686 = weight(_text_:22 in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03500686 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15080018 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043063257 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Content
    A Thesis presented to The University of Guelph In partial fulfilment of requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Computer Science. Vgl. Unter: http://www.inf.ufrgs.br%2F~ceramisch%2Fdownload_files%2Fpublications%2F2009%2Fp01.pdf.
    Date
    10. 1.2013 19:22:47
  13. Copeland, B.J.: Turing: pioneer of the information age (2012) 0.08 
    0.08014102 = product of:
  0.20035255 = sum of:
    0.10666794 = weight(_text_:great in 3025) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10666794 = score(doc=3025,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.2424797 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043063257 = queryNorm
        0.43990463 = fieldWeight in 3025, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3025)
    0.09368461 = product of:
      0.18736923 = sum of:
        0.18736923 = weight(_text_:britain in 3025) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18736923 = score(doc=3025,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.32137164 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.462781 = idf(docFreq=68, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043063257 = queryNorm
            0.58302975 = fieldWeight in 3025, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              7.462781 = idf(docFreq=68, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3025)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    LCSH
    Mathematicians / Great Britain / Biography
    Subject
    Mathematicians / Great Britain / Biography
  14. Heuvel, C. van den: ¬The Decimal Office : administration as a science in the Netherlands in the first decades of the twentieth century (2013) 0.08 
    0.07933556 = product of:
  0.19833891 = sum of:
    0.10559587 = weight(_text_:great in 5521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10559587 = score(doc=5521,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2424797 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043063257 = queryNorm
        0.43548337 = fieldWeight in 5521, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5521)
    0.09274304 = product of:
      0.18548608 = sum of:
        0.18548608 = weight(_text_:britain in 5521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18548608 = score(doc=5521,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.32137164 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.462781 = idf(docFreq=68, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043063257 = queryNorm
            0.57717 = fieldWeight in 5521, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.462781 = idf(docFreq=68, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5521)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    In 1983 Boyd Rayward described the early diffusion abroad of the Dewey Decimal Classification (and indirectly of the Universal Decimal Classification) in Australia, Great Britain, Belgium, France, Switzerland, and Russia. Here, I discuss the enormous interest in the decimal system in the Netherlands that went far beyond its original role for the classification of bibliographic knowledge. I will present Johan Zaalberg (1858-1934) and Ernst Hijmans (1890-1987) as two advocates for the use of the decimal system in the administration of public organizations and private companies and its role in the development of scientific management in the Netherlands.
  15. Somers, J.: Torching the modern-day library of Alexandria : somewhere at Google there is a database containing 25 million books and nobody is allowed to read them. (2017) 0.07 
    0.06855081 = product of:
  0.114251345 = sum of:
    0.042241894 = weight(_text_:education in 3608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.042241894 = score(doc=3608,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20288157 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043063257 = queryNorm
        0.2082096 = fieldWeight in 3608, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3608)
    0.060340498 = weight(_text_:great in 3608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.060340498 = score(doc=3608,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2424797 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043063257 = queryNorm
        0.24884763 = fieldWeight in 3608, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3608)
    0.011668953 = product of:
      0.023337906 = sum of:
        0.023337906 = weight(_text_:22 in 3608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023337906 = score(doc=3608,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15080018 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043063257 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3608, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3608)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Abstract
    You were going to get one-click access to the full text of nearly every book that's ever been published. Books still in print you'd have to pay for, but everything else-a collection slated to grow larger than the holdings at the Library of Congress, Harvard, the University of Michigan, at any of the great national libraries of Europe-would have been available for free at terminals that were going to be placed in every local library that wanted one. At the terminal you were going to be able to search tens of millions of books and read every page of any book you found. You'd be able to highlight passages and make annotations and share them; for the first time, you'd be able to pinpoint an idea somewhere inside the vastness of the printed record, and send somebody straight to it with a link. Books would become as instantly available, searchable, copy-pasteable-as alive in the digital world-as web pages. It was to be the realization of a long-held dream. "The universal library has been talked about for millennia," Richard Ovenden, the head of Oxford's Bodleian Libraries, has said. "It was possible to think in the Renaissance that you might be able to amass the whole of published knowledge in a single room or a single institution." In the spring of 2011, it seemed we'd amassed it in a terminal small enough to fit on a desk. "This is a watershed event and can serve as a catalyst for the reinvention of education, research, and intellectual life," one eager observer wrote at the time. On March 22 of that year, however, the legal agreement that would have unlocked a century's worth of books and peppered the country with access terminals to a universal library was rejected under Rule 23(e)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. When the library at Alexandria burned it was said to be an "international catastrophe." When the most significant humanities project of our time was dismantled in court, the scholars, archivists, and librarians who'd had a hand in its undoing breathed a sigh of relief, for they believed, at the time, that they had narrowly averted disaster.
  16. Herb, U.; Beucke, D.: ¬Die Zukunft der Impact-Messung : Social Media, Nutzung und Zitate im World Wide Web (2013) 0.05 
    0.054716695 = product of:
  0.27358347 = sum of:
    0.27358347 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.27358347 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.36509076 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043063257 = queryNorm
        0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Content
    Vgl. unter: https://www.leibniz-science20.de%2Fforschung%2Fprojekte%2Faltmetrics-in-verschiedenen-wissenschaftsdisziplinen%2F&ei=2jTgVaaXGcK4Udj1qdgB&usg=AFQjCNFOPdONj4RKBDf9YDJOLuz3lkGYlg&sig2=5YI3KWIGxBmk5_kv0P_8iQ.
  17. Zhang, P.; Yan, J.L.S.; DeVries Hassman, K.: ¬The intellectual characteristics of the information field : heritage and substance (2013) 0.05 
    0.051291198 = product of:
  0.128228 = sum of:
    0.052802365 = weight(_text_:education in 1132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.052802365 = score(doc=1132,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20288157 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043063257 = queryNorm
        0.260262 = fieldWeight in 1132, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1132)
    0.075425625 = weight(_text_:great in 1132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.075425625 = score(doc=1132,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2424797 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043063257 = queryNorm
        0.31105953 = fieldWeight in 1132, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1132)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    As the information field (IField) becomes more recognized by different constituencies for education and research, the need to better understand its intellectual characteristics becomes more compelling. Although there are various conceptualizations of the IField, to date, in-depth studies based on empirical evidence are scarce. This article reports a study that fills this gap. We focus on the first five ISchools in the ICaucus as a proxy to represent the IField. The intellectual characteristics are depicted by two independent sets of data on tenure track faculty as knowledge contributors: their intellectual heritages and the intellectual substance in their journal publications. We use a critical analysis method to examine doctoral training areas and 3 years of journal publications. Our results indicate that (a) the IField can be better conceptualized with empirical support by a four-component model that includes People, Information, Technology, and Management, as predicted by the I-Model (Zhang & Benjamin, 2007); (b) the ISchools' faculty members are diverse, interdisciplinary, and multidisciplinary as shown by their intellectual heritages, by their research foci, by journals in which they publish, by the contexts within which they conduct research, and by the levels of analysis in research investigations; (c) the five ISchools share similarities while evincing differences in both faculty heritages and intellectual substances; (d) ISchool tenure track faculty members do not collaborate much with each other within or across schools although there is great potential; and (e) intellectual heritages are not good predictors of scholars' intellectual substance. We conclude by discussing the implications of the findings on IField identity, IField development, new ISchool formation and existing ISchool evolution, faculty career development, and collaboration within the IField.
  18. Salmerón, L.; Macedo-Rouet, M.; Rouet, J.-F.: Multiple viewpoints increase students' attention to source features in social question and answer forum messages (2016) 0.05 
    0.051291198 = product of:
  0.128228 = sum of:
    0.052802365 = weight(_text_:education in 3120) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.052802365 = score(doc=3120,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20288157 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043063257 = queryNorm
        0.260262 = fieldWeight in 3120, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3120)
    0.075425625 = weight(_text_:great in 3120) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.075425625 = score(doc=3120,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2424797 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043063257 = queryNorm
        0.31105953 = fieldWeight in 3120, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3120)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Social question & answer forums offer great learning opportunities, but students need to evaluate the credibility of answers to avoid being misled by untrustworthy sources. This critical evaluation may be beyond the capabilities of students from primary and secondary school. We conducted 2 studies to assess how students from primary, secondary, and undergraduate education perceive and use 2 relevant credibility cues in forums: author's identity and evidence used to support his answer. Students didn't use these cues when they evaluated forums with a single answer (Experiment 1), but they recommended more often answers from self-reported experts than from users with a pseudonym when multiple sources were discussed in the forum (Experiment 2). This pattern of results suggested that multiple viewpoints increase students' attention to source features in forum messages. Experiment 2 also revealed that primary school students preferred personal experience as evidence in the messages, whereas undergraduate students preferred the inclusion of documentary sources. Thus, while children mimic the adult preference for expert sources in web forums, they treat source information in a rather superficial manner. To conclude, we outline possible mechanisms to understand how credibility assessment evolves across educational levels, and discuss potential implications for the educational curriculum in information literacy.
  19. Katona, J.M.: ¬The cultural and historical contexts of ornamental prints published in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries in Europe : a case study for the standardized description of museum objects (2017) 0.05 
    0.051291198 = product of:
  0.128228 = sum of:
    0.052802365 = weight(_text_:education in 4135) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.052802365 = score(doc=4135,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20288157 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043063257 = queryNorm
        0.260262 = fieldWeight in 4135, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4135)
    0.075425625 = weight(_text_:great in 4135) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.075425625 = score(doc=4135,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2424797 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043063257 = queryNorm
        0.31105953 = fieldWeight in 4135, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4135)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    The study focuses on ornamental prints (as components of pattern books) published and circulated all over Europe during the second half of the nineteenth century and in the first decades of the twentieth century. This special object type forms a particular segment not only in the history of ornamental prints and decorative arts in general but also in the history of architecture, applied arts, art education and archaeology. Enriched descriptions of these prints therefore have the potential to be of great benefit to scientific research in all the disciplines mentioned. The primary aim of this study is to survey and elaborate the standardized description of ornamental prints, considering them as visual works and describing them as museum objects. The paper attempts to answer questions posed from the multi-layered approach to scientific research, namely how to record ornamental prints that belong to a special object type, consisting of mixed visual and textual contents; and how to group the information in order to obtain the richest possible sets of data. The conceptual model of the standardized description will be elucidated with numerous examples, embedded in the broader art historical context.
  20. Hudon, M.: KO and classification education in the light of Benjamin Bloom's Taxonomy of learning objectives (2014) 0.05 
    0.050900437 = product of:
  0.12725109 = sum of:
    0.10974766 = weight(_text_:education in 1468) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10974766 = score(doc=1468,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.20288157 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043063257 = queryNorm
        0.54094446 = fieldWeight in 1468, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1468)
    0.01750343 = product of:
      0.03500686 = sum of:
        0.03500686 = weight(_text_:22 in 1468) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03500686 = score(doc=1468,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15080018 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043063257 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1468, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1468)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    In a research project focusing on knowledge organization and classification education, 407 learning objectives proposed in courses entirely or partially dedicated to these subjects in North American Library and Information Science programs were categorized with the help of the Benjamin Bloom's Taxonomy of cognitive objectives. The analysis reveals that the vast majority of course objectives remain at the lower levels of the Taxonomy. These results tend to reinforce observations made over the past 30 years in relation to KO and classification education. While KO and classification educators recognize the necessity for students to develop high-level analytic and evaluative skills, there are few references to those skills in current course objectives.
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik

Authors

Languages

  • e 673
  • d 204
  • a 1
  • f 1
  • hu 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 773
  • el 70
  • m 67
  • s 22
  • x 13
  • r 7
  • b 5
  • i 1
  • n 1
  • z 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications