Search (1912 results, page 1 of 96)

  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011) 0.39
    0.39391923 = product of:
      0.91914487 = sum of:
        0.13130641 = product of:
          0.3939192 = sum of:
            0.3939192 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.3939192 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.35045066 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041336425 = queryNorm
                1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.3939192 = weight(_text_:2f in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3939192 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35045066 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041336425 = queryNorm
            1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
        0.3939192 = weight(_text_:2f in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3939192 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35045066 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041336425 = queryNorm
            1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
  2. Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014) 0.33
    0.32826602 = product of:
      0.765954 = sum of:
        0.109422 = product of:
          0.328266 = sum of:
            0.328266 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.328266 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.35045066 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041336425 = queryNorm
                0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.328266 = weight(_text_:2f in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.328266 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35045066 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041336425 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
        0.328266 = weight(_text_:2f in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.328266 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35045066 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041336425 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Source
    http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
  3. Suchenwirth, L.: Sacherschliessung in Zeiten von Corona : neue Herausforderungen und Chancen (2019) 0.27
    0.26688817 = product of:
      0.6227391 = sum of:
        0.065653205 = product of:
          0.1969596 = sum of:
            0.1969596 = weight(_text_:3a in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1969596 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.35045066 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041336425 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.27854294 = weight(_text_:2f in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.27854294 = score(doc=484,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.35045066 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041336425 = queryNorm
            0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
        0.27854294 = weight(_text_:2f in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.27854294 = score(doc=484,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.35045066 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041336425 = queryNorm
            0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Footnote
    https%3A%2F%2Fjournals.univie.ac.at%2Findex.php%2Fvoebm%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F5332%2F5271%2F&usg=AOvVaw2yQdFGHlmOwVls7ANCpTii.
  4. Gödert, W.; Lepsky, K.: Informationelle Kompetenz : ein humanistischer Entwurf (2019) 0.23
    0.2297862 = product of:
      0.5361678 = sum of:
        0.0765954 = product of:
          0.2297862 = sum of:
            0.2297862 = weight(_text_:3a in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.2297862 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.35045066 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041336425 = queryNorm
                0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.2297862 = weight(_text_:2f in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2297862 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35045066 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041336425 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
        0.2297862 = weight(_text_:2f in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2297862 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35045066 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041336425 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Philosophisch-ethische Rezensionen vom 09.11.2019 (Jürgen Czogalla), Unter: https://philosophisch-ethische-rezensionen.de/rezension/Goedert1.html. In: B.I.T. online 23(2020) H.3, S.345-347 (W. Sühl-Strohmenger) [Unter: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.b-i-t-online.de%2Fheft%2F2020-03-rezensionen.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0iY3f_zNcvEjeZ6inHVnOK]. In: Open Password Nr. 805 vom 14.08.2020 (H.-C. Hobohm) [Unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzE0MywiOGI3NjZkZmNkZjQ1IiwwLDAsMTMxLDFd].
  5. Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019) 0.20
    0.19695961 = product of:
      0.45957243 = sum of:
        0.065653205 = product of:
          0.1969596 = sum of:
            0.1969596 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1969596 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.35045066 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041336425 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.1969596 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1969596 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35045066 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041336425 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
        0.1969596 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1969596 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35045066 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041336425 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
  6. Xiong, C.: Knowledge based text representations for information retrieval (2016) 0.18
    0.17792545 = product of:
      0.41515937 = sum of:
        0.0437688 = product of:
          0.1313064 = sum of:
            0.1313064 = weight(_text_:3a in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1313064 = score(doc=5820,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.35045066 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041336425 = queryNorm
                0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.18569529 = weight(_text_:2f in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18569529 = score(doc=5820,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.35045066 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041336425 = queryNorm
            0.5298757 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
        0.18569529 = weight(_text_:2f in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18569529 = score(doc=5820,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.35045066 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041336425 = queryNorm
            0.5298757 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Content
    Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Language and Information Technologies. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cs.cmu.edu%2F~cx%2Fpapers%2Fknowledge_based_text_representation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0SaTSvhWLTh__Uz_HtOtl3.
  7. Huo, W.: Automatic multi-word term extraction and its application to Web-page summarization (2012) 0.18
    0.17602317 = product of:
      0.41072074 = sum of:
        0.1969596 = weight(_text_:2f in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1969596 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35045066 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041336425 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
        0.1969596 = weight(_text_:2f in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1969596 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35045066 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041336425 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
        0.016801544 = product of:
          0.033603087 = sum of:
            0.033603087 = weight(_text_:22 in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033603087 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14475311 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041336425 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Content
    A Thesis presented to The University of Guelph In partial fulfilment of requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Computer Science. Vgl. Unter: http://www.inf.ufrgs.br%2F~ceramisch%2Fdownload_files%2Fpublications%2F2009%2Fp01.pdf.
    Date
    10. 1.2013 19:22:47
  8. Farazi, M.: Faceted lightweight ontologies : a formalization and some experiments (2010) 0.16
    0.16413301 = product of:
      0.382977 = sum of:
        0.054711 = product of:
          0.164133 = sum of:
            0.164133 = weight(_text_:3a in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.164133 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.35045066 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041336425 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.164133 = weight(_text_:2f in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.164133 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35045066 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041336425 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
        0.164133 = weight(_text_:2f in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.164133 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35045066 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041336425 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Content
    PhD Dissertation at International Doctorate School in Information and Communication Technology. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fcore.ac.uk%2Fdownload%2Fpdf%2F150083013.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2n-qisNagpyT0lli_6QbAQ.
  9. Shala, E.: ¬Die Autonomie des Menschen und der Maschine : gegenwärtige Definitionen von Autonomie zwischen philosophischem Hintergrund und technologischer Umsetzbarkeit (2014) 0.16
    0.16413301 = product of:
      0.382977 = sum of:
        0.054711 = product of:
          0.164133 = sum of:
            0.164133 = weight(_text_:3a in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.164133 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.35045066 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041336425 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.164133 = weight(_text_:2f in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.164133 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35045066 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041336425 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
        0.164133 = weight(_text_:2f in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.164133 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35045066 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041336425 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl. unter: https://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwizweHljdbcAhVS16QKHXcFD9QQFjABegQICRAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Fpublication%2F271200105_Die_Autonomie_des_Menschen_und_der_Maschine_-_gegenwartige_Definitionen_von_Autonomie_zwischen_philosophischem_Hintergrund_und_technologischer_Umsetzbarkeit_Redigierte_Version_der_Magisterarbeit_Karls&usg=AOvVaw06orrdJmFF2xbCCp_hL26q.
  10. Piros, A.: Az ETO-jelzetek automatikus interpretálásának és elemzésének kérdései (2018) 0.16
    0.16413301 = product of:
      0.382977 = sum of:
        0.054711 = product of:
          0.164133 = sum of:
            0.164133 = weight(_text_:3a in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.164133 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.35045066 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041336425 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.164133 = weight(_text_:2f in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.164133 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35045066 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041336425 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
        0.164133 = weight(_text_:2f in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.164133 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35045066 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041336425 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Content
    Vgl. auch: New automatic interpreter for complex UDC numbers. Unter: <https%3A%2F%2Fudcc.org%2Ffiles%2FAttilaPiros_EC_36-37_2014-2015.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3kc9CwDDCWP7aArpfjrs5b>
  11. Herb, U.; Beucke, D.: ¬Die Zukunft der Impact-Messung : Social Media, Nutzung und Zitate im World Wide Web (2013) 0.15
    0.15006445 = product of:
      0.5252256 = sum of:
        0.2626128 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2626128 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35045066 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041336425 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
        0.2626128 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2626128 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35045066 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041336425 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Content
    Vgl. unter: https://www.leibniz-science20.de%2Fforschung%2Fprojekte%2Faltmetrics-in-verschiedenen-wissenschaftsdisziplinen%2F&ei=2jTgVaaXGcK4Udj1qdgB&usg=AFQjCNFOPdONj4RKBDf9YDJOLuz3lkGYlg&sig2=5YI3KWIGxBmk5_kv0P_8iQ.
  12. Benoit, G.; Hussey, L.: Repurposing digital objects : case studies across the publishing industry (2011) 0.11
    0.11206607 = product of:
      0.26148748 = sum of:
        0.062909216 = weight(_text_:management in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.062909216 = score(doc=4198,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.13932906 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041336425 = queryNorm
            0.45151538 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
        0.08738727 = weight(_text_:case in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08738727 = score(doc=4198,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18173204 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041336425 = queryNorm
            0.48085782 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
        0.111191005 = sum of:
          0.071987405 = weight(_text_:studies in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.071987405 = score(doc=4198,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.16494368 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041336425 = queryNorm
              0.43643627 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
          0.039203603 = weight(_text_:22 in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.039203603 = score(doc=4198,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14475311 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041336425 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    Large, data-rich organizations have tremendously large collections of digital objects to be "repurposed," to respond quickly and economically to publishing, marketing, and information needs. Some management typically assume that a content management system, or some other technique such as OWL and RDF, will automatically address the workflow and technical issues associated with this reuse. Four case studies show that the sources of some roadblocks to agile repurposing are as much managerial and organizational as they are technical in nature. The review concludes with suggestions on how digital object repurposing can be integrated given these organizations' structures.
    Date
    22. 1.2011 14:23:07
    Theme
    Content Management System
  13. Blair, A: Too much to know : managing scholarly information before the modern age (2011) 0.09
    0.09242995 = product of:
      0.3235048 = sum of:
        0.03594812 = weight(_text_:management in 4474) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03594812 = score(doc=4474,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.13932906 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041336425 = queryNorm
            0.25800878 = fieldWeight in 4474, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4474)
        0.28755668 = weight(_text_:europe in 4474) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.28755668 = score(doc=4474,freq=36.0), product of:
            0.25178367 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041336425 = queryNorm
            1.1420784 = fieldWeight in 4474, product of:
              6.0 = tf(freq=36.0), with freq of:
                36.0 = termFreq=36.0
              6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4474)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    The flood of information brought to us by advancing technology is often accompanied by a distressing sense of "information overload," yet this experience is not unique to modern times. In fact, says Ann M. Blair in this intriguing book, the invention of the printing press and the ensuing abundance of books provoked sixteenth- and seventeenth-century European scholars to register complaints very similar to our own. Blair examines methods of information management in ancient and medieval Europe as well as the Islamic world and China, then focuses particular attention on the organization, composition, and reception of Latin reference books in print in early modern Europe. She explores in detail the sophisticated and sometimes idiosyncratic techniques that scholars and readers developed in an era of new technology and exploding information.
    Content
    Information management in comparative perspective -- Note-taking as information management -- Reference genres and their finding devices -- Compilers, their motivations and methods -- The impact of early printed reference books.
    LCSH
    Reference books, Latin / Europe / History / 16th century
    Reference books, Latin / Europe / History / 17th century
    Communication in learning and scholarship / Europe / History / 17th century
    Bibliography / Europe / History / 16th century
    Bibliography / Europe / History / 17th century
    Europe / Intellectual life / 16th century
    Europe / Intellectual life / 17th century
    Communication in learning and scholarship / Europe / History / 16th century
    Subject
    Reference books, Latin / Europe / History / 16th century
    Reference books, Latin / Europe / History / 17th century
    Communication in learning and scholarship / Europe / History / 17th century
    Bibliography / Europe / History / 16th century
    Bibliography / Europe / History / 17th century
    Europe / Intellectual life / 16th century
    Europe / Intellectual life / 17th century
    Communication in learning and scholarship / Europe / History / 16th century
  14. Homan, P.A.: Library catalog notes for "bad books" : ethics vs. responsibilities (2012) 0.07
    0.07005882 = product of:
      0.16347058 = sum of:
        0.036689393 = weight(_text_:management in 420) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036689393 = score(doc=420,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13932906 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041336425 = queryNorm
            0.2633291 = fieldWeight in 420, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=420)
        0.062419478 = weight(_text_:case in 420) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.062419478 = score(doc=420,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18173204 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041336425 = queryNorm
            0.34346986 = fieldWeight in 420, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=420)
        0.06436171 = sum of:
          0.03635913 = weight(_text_:studies in 420) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03635913 = score(doc=420,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16494368 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041336425 = queryNorm
              0.22043361 = fieldWeight in 420, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=420)
          0.028002575 = weight(_text_:22 in 420) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.028002575 = score(doc=420,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14475311 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041336425 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 420, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=420)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    The conflict between librarians' ethics and their responsibilities in the process of progressive collection management, which applies the principles of cost accounting to libraries, to call attention to the "bad books" in their collections that are compromised by age, error, abridgement, expurgation, plagiarism, copyright violation, libel, or fraud, is discussed. According to Charles Cutter, notes in catalog records should call attention to the best books but ignore the bad ones. Libraries that can afford to keep their "bad books," however, which often have a valuable second life, must call attention to their intellectual contexts in notes in the catalog records. Michael Bellesiles's Arming America, the most famous case of academic fraud at the turn of the twenty-first century, is used as a test case. Given the bias of content enhancement that automatically pulls content from the Web into library catalogs, catalog notes for "bad books" may be the only way for librarians to uphold their ethical principles regarding collection management while fulfilling their professional responsibilities to their users in calling attention to their "bad books."
    Content
    Beitrag aus einem Themenheft zu den Proceedings of the 2nd Milwaukee Conference on Ethics in Information Organization, June 15-16, 2012, School of Information Studies, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. Hope A. Olson, Conference Chair. Vgl.: http://www.ergon-verlag.de/isko_ko/downloads/ko_39_2012_5_f.pdf.
    Date
    27. 9.2012 14:22:00
  15. Timmermann, M.: ¬A collective challenge : open science from the perspective of Science Europe (2019) 0.07
    0.065900184 = product of:
      0.23065063 = sum of:
        0.062909216 = weight(_text_:management in 5698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.062909216 = score(doc=5698,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.13932906 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041336425 = queryNorm
            0.45151538 = fieldWeight in 5698, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5698)
        0.16774142 = weight(_text_:europe in 5698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16774142 = score(doc=5698,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.25178367 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041336425 = queryNorm
            0.66621244 = fieldWeight in 5698, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5698)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Open Science aims to enhance the quality of research by making research and its outputs openly available, reproducible and accessible. Science Europe, the association f major Research Funding Organisations and Research Performing Organisations, advocates data sharing as one of the core aspects of Open Science and promotes a more harmonised approach to data sharing policies. Good research data management is a prerequisite for Open Science and data management policies should be aligned as much as possible, while taking into account discipline-specific differences. Research data management is a broad and complex field with many actors involved. It needs collective efforts by all actors to work towards aligned policies that foster Open Science.
  16. Egghe, L.; Guns, R.; Rousseau, R.; Leuven, K.U.: Erratum (2012) 0.06
    0.0619994 = product of:
      0.21699789 = sum of:
        0.08827448 = weight(_text_:case in 4992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08827448 = score(doc=4992,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18173204 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041336425 = queryNorm
            0.48573974 = fieldWeight in 4992, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4992)
        0.12872341 = sum of:
          0.07271826 = weight(_text_:studies in 4992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07271826 = score(doc=4992,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16494368 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041336425 = queryNorm
              0.44086722 = fieldWeight in 4992, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4992)
          0.05600515 = weight(_text_:22 in 4992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05600515 = score(doc=4992,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14475311 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041336425 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4992, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4992)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Date
    14. 2.2012 12:53:22
    Footnote
    This article corrects: Thoughts on uncitedness: Nobel laureates and Fields medalists as case studies in: JASIST 62(2011) no,8, S.1637-1644.
  17. Qin, J.: ¬A relation typology in knowledge organization systems : case studies in the research data management domain (2018) 0.06
    0.06052123 = product of:
      0.1412162 = sum of:
        0.04150931 = weight(_text_:management in 4773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04150931 = score(doc=4773,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13932906 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041336425 = queryNorm
            0.29792285 = fieldWeight in 4773, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4773)
        0.07061958 = weight(_text_:case in 4773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07061958 = score(doc=4773,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18173204 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041336425 = queryNorm
            0.3885918 = fieldWeight in 4773, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4773)
        0.029087303 = product of:
          0.058174606 = sum of:
            0.058174606 = weight(_text_:studies in 4773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.058174606 = score(doc=4773,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16494368 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041336425 = queryNorm
                0.35269377 = fieldWeight in 4773, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4773)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
  18. Zhu, Q.; Kong, X.; Hong, S.; Li, J.; He, Z.: Global ontology research progress : a bibliometric analysis (2015) 0.06
    0.060519602 = product of:
      0.1412124 = sum of:
        0.036689393 = weight(_text_:management in 2590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036689393 = score(doc=2590,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13932906 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041336425 = queryNorm
            0.2633291 = fieldWeight in 2590, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2590)
        0.0847222 = weight(_text_:europe in 2590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0847222 = score(doc=2590,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25178367 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041336425 = queryNorm
            0.33648807 = fieldWeight in 2590, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2590)
        0.01980081 = product of:
          0.03960162 = sum of:
            0.03960162 = weight(_text_:22 in 2590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03960162 = score(doc=2590,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14475311 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041336425 = queryNorm
                0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2590, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2590)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to analyse the global scientific outputs of ontology research, an important emerging discipline that has huge potential to improve information understanding, organization, and management. Design/methodology/approach - This study collected literature published during 1900-2012 from the Web of Science database. The bibliometric analysis was performed from authorial, institutional, national, spatiotemporal, and topical aspects. Basic statistical analysis, visualization of geographic distribution, co-word analysis, and a new index were applied to the selected data. Findings - Characteristics of publication outputs suggested that ontology research has entered into the soaring stage, along with increased participation and collaboration. The authors identified the leading authors, institutions, nations, and articles in ontology research. Authors were more from North America, Europe, and East Asia. The USA took the lead, while China grew fastest. Four major categories of frequently used keywords were identified: applications in Semantic Web, applications in bioinformatics, philosophy theories, and common supporting technology. Semantic Web research played a core role, and gene ontology study was well-developed. The study focus of ontology has shifted from philosophy to information science. Originality/value - This is the first study to quantify global research patterns and trends in ontology, which might provide a potential guide for the future research. The new index provides an alternative way to evaluate the multidisciplinary influence of researchers.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    17. 9.2018 18:22:23
    Source
    Aslib journal of information management. 67(2015) no.1, S.27-54
  19. Salminen, A.; Jauhiainen, E.; Nurmeksela, R.: ¬A life cycle model of XML documents (2014) 0.06
    0.0587332 = product of:
      0.13704413 = sum of:
        0.062263966 = weight(_text_:management in 1553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.062263966 = score(doc=1553,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.13932906 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041336425 = queryNorm
            0.44688427 = fieldWeight in 1553, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1553)
        0.052964687 = weight(_text_:case in 1553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052964687 = score(doc=1553,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18173204 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041336425 = queryNorm
            0.29144385 = fieldWeight in 1553, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1553)
        0.021815477 = product of:
          0.043630954 = sum of:
            0.043630954 = weight(_text_:studies in 1553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043630954 = score(doc=1553,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16494368 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041336425 = queryNorm
                0.26452032 = fieldWeight in 1553, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1553)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    Electronic documents produced in business processes are valuable information resources for organizations. In many cases they have to be accessible long after the life of the business processes or information systems in connection with which they were created. To improve the management and preservation of documents, organizations are deploying Extensible Markup Language (XML) as a standardized format for documents. The goal of this paper is to increase understanding of XML document management and provide a framework to enable the analysis and description of the management of XML documents throughout their life. We followed the design science approach. We introduce a document life cycle model consisting of five phases. For each of the phases we describe the typical activities related to the management of XML documents. Furthermore, we also identify the typical actors, systems, and types of content items associated with the activities of the phases. We demonstrate the use of the model in two case studies: one concerning the State Budget Proposal of the Finnish government and the other concerning a faculty council meeting agenda at a university.
  20. Yeoh, W.; Popovic, A.: Extending the understanding of critical success factors for implementing business intelligence systems (2016) 0.06
    0.0586659 = product of:
      0.1368871 = sum of:
        0.031131983 = weight(_text_:management in 2488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031131983 = score(doc=2488,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13932906 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041336425 = queryNorm
            0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 2488, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2488)
        0.07490338 = weight(_text_:case in 2488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07490338 = score(doc=2488,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18173204 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041336425 = queryNorm
            0.41216385 = fieldWeight in 2488, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2488)
        0.030851744 = product of:
          0.06170349 = sum of:
            0.06170349 = weight(_text_:studies in 2488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06170349 = score(doc=2488,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16494368 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041336425 = queryNorm
                0.37408823 = fieldWeight in 2488, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2488)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    Extant studies suggest implementing a business intelligence (BI) system is a costly, resource-intensive and complex undertaking. Literature draws attention to the critical success factors (CSFs) for implementation of BI systems. Leveraging case studies of seven large organizations and blending them with Yeoh and Koronios's (2010) BI CSFs framework, our empirical study gives evidence to support this notion of CSFs and provides better contextual understanding of the CSFs in BI implementation domain. Cross-case analysis suggests that organizational factors play the most crucial role in determining the success of a BI system implementation. Hence, BI stakeholders should prioritize on the organizational dimension ahead of other factors. Our findings allow BI stakeholders to holistically understand the CSFs and the associated contextual issues that impact on implementation of BI systems.
    Theme
    Information Resources Management

Languages

Types

  • a 1687
  • el 142
  • m 138
  • s 52
  • x 31
  • r 9
  • b 6
  • i 2
  • n 1
  • p 1
  • z 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications