Search (663 results, page 1 of 34)

0.11536066 = product of:
  0.23072132 = sum of:
    0.23072132 = product of:
      0.46144265 = sum of:
        0.46144265 = weight(_text_:disclosure in 2766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.46144265 = score(doc=2766,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.40591347 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.401051 = idf(docFreq=26, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04831699 = queryNorm
            1.1368005 = fieldWeight in 2766, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              8.401051 = idf(docFreq=26, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2766)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Disclosure of personal information on social networks has been extensively researched in recent years from different perspectives, including the influence of demographic, personality, and social parameters on the extent and type of disclosure. However, although some of the most widespread uses of these networks nowadays are for professional, academic, and business purposes, a thorough investigation of professional information disclosure is still needed. This study's primary aim, therefore, is to conduct a systematic and comprehensive investigation into patterns of professional information disclosure and various factors involved on different types of social networks. To this end, a user survey was conducted. We focused specifically on Facebook and LinkedIn, the 2 diverse networks most widely used in Israel. Significant differences were found between these networks. For example, we found that on Facebook professional pride is a factor in professional information disclosure, whereas on LinkedIn, work seniority and income have a significant effect. Thus, our findings shed light on the attitudes and professional behavior of network members, leading to recommendations regarding advertising strategies and network-appropriate self-presentation, as well as approaches that companies might adopt according to the type of manpower required.

0.11536066 = product of:
  0.23072132 = sum of:
    0.23072132 = product of:
      0.46144265 = sum of:
        0.46144265 = weight(_text_:disclosure in 3832) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.46144265 = score(doc=3832,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.40591347 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.401051 = idf(docFreq=26, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04831699 = queryNorm
            1.1368005 = fieldWeight in 3832, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              8.401051 = idf(docFreq=26, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3832)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Although people disclose illicit activities such as drug use online, we currently know little about what information people choose to disclose and share or whether there are differences in behavior depending on the illicit activity being disclosed. This exploratory mixed-methods study examines how people discuss and disclose the use of two different drugs-marijuana and opioids-on Reddit. In this study, hermeneutic content analysis is employed to describe the type of comments people make in forums dedicated to discussions about illicit drugs. With inductive analysis, seven categories of comments were identified: disclosure, instruction and advice, culture, community norms, moralizing, legality, and banter. Our subsequent quantitative analysis indicates that although the amounts of disclosure are similar in each subreddit, there are more instances of instruction and advice in discussions about opiates, and more examples of banter in comments about marijuana use. In fact, both subreddits have high rates of banter. We argue that banter fosters disclosure in both subreddits, and that banter and disclosure are linked with information-seeking behaviors in online forums. This work has implications for future explorations of disclosure online and for public health interventions aimed at disseminating credible information about drug use to at-risk individuals.

0.113029905 = product of:
  0.22605981 = sum of:
    0.22605981 = product of:
      0.45211962 = sum of:
        0.45211962 = weight(_text_:disclosure in 3203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.45211962 = score(doc=3203,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.40591347 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.401051 = idf(docFreq=26, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04831699 = queryNorm
            1.1138325 = fieldWeight in 3203, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              8.401051 = idf(docFreq=26, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3203)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

With bases in protection motivation theory and social capital theory, this study investigates teen and parental factors that determine teens' online privacy concerns, online privacy protection behaviors, and subsequent online information disclosure on social network sites. With secondary data from a 2012 survey (N?=?622), the final well-fitting structural equation model revealed that teen online privacy concerns were primarily influenced by parental interpersonal trust and parental concerns about teens' online privacy, whereas teen privacy protection behaviors were primarily predicted by teen cost-benefit appraisal of online interactions. In turn, teen online privacy concerns predicted increased privacy protection behaviors and lower teen information disclosure. Finally, restrictive and instructive parental mediation exerted differential influences on teens' privacy protection behaviors and online information disclosure.

0.09419158 = product of:
  0.18838316 = sum of:
    0.18838316 = product of:
      0.37676632 = sum of:
        0.37676632 = weight(_text_:disclosure in 614) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.37676632 = score(doc=614,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.40591347 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.401051 = idf(docFreq=26, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04831699 = queryNorm
            0.9281937 = fieldWeight in 614, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              8.401051 = idf(docFreq=26, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=614)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

There is an abundance of evidence to suggest that online behavior differs from behaviors in the offline world, and that there are a number of important factors which may affect the communication strategies of people within an online space. This article examines some of these, namely, whether the sex, age, and identifiability of blog authors, as well as the genre of communication, affect communication strategies. Findings suggest that the level of identifiability of the blog author has a limited effect upon their communication strategies. However, sex appeared to influence online behavior in so far as men were more likely to swear and attack others in their blogs. Genre had an important influence on disclosure with more self-disclosure taking place in the diary genre (i.e., blogs in which people talk about their own lives) comparative to the filter genre (i.e., blogs in which people talk about events external to their lives). Age affected both self-disclosure and language use. For example, younger bloggers tended to use more swearing, express more negative emotions and disclose more personal information about others. These findings suggest that age, sex, genre, and identifiability form a cluster of variables that influence the language style and self-disclosure patterns of bloggers; however, the level of identifiability of the blogger may be less important in this respect. Implications of these findings are discussed.

0.0815723 = product of:
  0.1631446 = sum of:
    0.1631446 = product of:
      0.3262892 = sum of:
        0.3262892 = weight(_text_:disclosure in 3146) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3262892 = score(doc=3146,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.40591347 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.401051 = idf(docFreq=26, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04831699 = queryNorm
            0.8038393 = fieldWeight in 3146, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              8.401051 = idf(docFreq=26, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3146)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Many computer users today value personalization but perceive it in conflict with their desire for privacy. They therefore tend not to disclose data that would be useful for personalization. We investigate how characteristics of the personalization provider influence users' attitudes towards personalization and their resulting disclosure behavior. We propose an integrative model that links these characteristics via privacy attitudes to actual disclosure behavior. Using the Elaboration Likelihood Model, we discuss in what way the influence of the manipulated provider characteristics is different for users engaging in different levels of elaboration (represented by the user characteristics of privacy concerns and self-efficacy). We find particularly that (a) reputation management is effective when users predominantly use the peripheral route (i.e., a low level of elaboration), but much less so when they predominantly use the central route (i.e., a high level of elaboration); (b) client-side personalization has a positive impact when users use either route; and (c) personalization in the cloud does not work well in either route. Managers and designers can use our results to instill more favorable privacy attitudes and increase disclosure, using different techniques that depend on each user's levels of privacy concerns and privacy self-efficacy.

0.07992421 = product of:
  0.15984842 = sum of:
    0.15984842 = product of:
      0.31969684 = sum of:
        0.31969684 = weight(_text_:disclosure in 3533) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.31969684 = score(doc=3533,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.40591347 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.401051 = idf(docFreq=26, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04831699 = queryNorm
            0.7875985 = fieldWeight in 3533, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.401051 = idf(docFreq=26, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3533)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Design of peer-review support systems is shaped by the policies that define and govern the process of peer review. An important component of these are policies that deal with anonymity: The rules that govern the concealment and transparency of information related to identities of the various stakeholders (authors, reviewers, editors, and others) involved in the peer-review process. Anonymity policies have been a subject of debate for several decades within scholarly communities. Because of widespread criticism of traditional peer-review processes, a variety of new peer-review processes have emerged that manage the trade-offs between disclosure and concealment of identities in different ways. Based on an analysis of policies and guidelines for authors and reviewers provided by publication venues, we developed a framework for understanding how disclosure and concealment of identities is managed. We discuss the appropriate role of information technology and computer support for the peer-review process within that framework.

0.07992421 = product of:
  0.15984842 = sum of:
    0.15984842 = product of:
      0.31969684 = sum of:
        0.31969684 = weight(_text_:disclosure in 4984) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.31969684 = score(doc=4984,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.40591347 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.401051 = idf(docFreq=26, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04831699 = queryNorm
            0.7875985 = fieldWeight in 4984, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.401051 = idf(docFreq=26, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4984)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Drawing on identity theory and privacy research, this article argues that the need for self-identity is a key factor affecting people's privacy behavior in social networking sites. I first unpack the mainstream, autonomy-centric discourse of privacy, and then present a research model that illustrates a possible new theorization of the relationship between self-identity and information privacy. An empirical study with Facebook users confirms the main hypotheses. In particular, the data show that the need for self-identity is positively related to privacy management behaviors, which in turn result in increased self-disclosure in online social networks. I subsequently argue that the so-called "privacy paradox" is not a paradox per se in the context of online social networking; rather, privacy concerns reflect the ideology of an autonomous self, whereas social construction of self-identity explains voluntary self-disclosure.

0.07674019 = product of:
  0.15348038 = sum of:
    0.15348038 = product of:
      0.4604411 = sum of:
        0.4604411 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.4604411 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.40963197 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04831699 = queryNorm
            1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.

0.06593411 = product of:
  0.13186821 = sum of:
    0.13186821 = product of:
      0.26373643 = sum of:
        0.26373643 = weight(_text_:disclosure in 4115) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.26373643 = score(doc=4115,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.40591347 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.401051 = idf(docFreq=26, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04831699 = queryNorm
            0.64973557 = fieldWeight in 4115, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.401051 = idf(docFreq=26, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4115)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.06395016 = product of:
  0.12790032 = sum of:
    0.12790032 = product of:
      0.38370094 = sum of:
        0.38370094 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.38370094 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.40963197 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04831699 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja

0.056514952 = product of:
  0.113029905 = sum of:
    0.113029905 = product of:
      0.22605981 = sum of:
        0.22605981 = weight(_text_:disclosure in 1325) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22605981 = score(doc=1325,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.40591347 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.401051 = idf(docFreq=26, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04831699 = queryNorm
            0.55691624 = fieldWeight in 1325, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.401051 = idf(docFreq=26, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1325)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Electronic health record (EHR) systems can improve service efficiency and quality within the health care sector and thus have been widely considered for adoption. Yet the introduction of such systems has caused much concern about patients' information privacy. This study provides new insights into how privacy concerns play a role in patients' decisions to permit digitization of their personal health information. We conducted an online experiment and collected data from 164 patients who are involved in the nonmandatory EHR adoption in the Netherlands. We found that the negative effect of information privacy concerns on patients' willingness to opt in is influenced by the degree of EHR system interoperability and patients' ability to control disclosure of their information. The results show that, for a networked EHR system, the negative effect of privacy concerns on opt-in behavior was reinforced more than for the stand-alone system. The results also suggest that giving patients greater ability to control their information can alleviate their privacy concerns when they make opt-in decisions. We discuss the implications of these findings.

0.056514952 = product of:
  0.113029905 = sum of:
    0.113029905 = product of:
      0.22605981 = sum of:
        0.22605981 = weight(_text_:disclosure in 1340) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22605981 = score(doc=1340,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.40591347 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.401051 = idf(docFreq=26, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04831699 = queryNorm
            0.55691624 = fieldWeight in 1340, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.401051 = idf(docFreq=26, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1340)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This article develops a framework for analyzing and comparing privacy and privacy protections across (inter alia) time, place, and polity and for examining factors that affect privacy and privacy protection. This framework provides a method to describe precisely aspects of privacy and context and a flexible vocabulary and notation for such descriptions and comparisons. Moreover, it links philosophical and conceptual work on privacy to social science and policy work and accommodates different conceptions of the nature and value of privacy. The article begins with an outline of the framework. It then refines the view by describing a hypothetical application. Finally, it applies the framework to a real-world privacy issue-campaign finance disclosure laws in the United States and France. The article concludes with an argument that the framework offers important advantages to privacy scholarship and for privacy policy makers.

0.04709579 = product of:
  0.09419158 = sum of:
    0.09419158 = product of:
      0.18838316 = sum of:
        0.18838316 = weight(_text_:disclosure in 1733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18838316 = score(doc=1733,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.40591347 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.401051 = idf(docFreq=26, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04831699 = queryNorm
            0.46409684 = fieldWeight in 1733, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.401051 = idf(docFreq=26, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1733)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Although social network sites (SNS) users' privacy concerns cannot be completely removed by privacy policies and security safeguards, the user base of SNS is constantly expanding. To explain this phenomenon, we use the lens of the calculus of behavior within a cost-benefit framework suggesting privacy concerns as cost factors and behavior enticements as benefit factors and examine how the enticements operate against privacy concerns in users' cost-benefit calculus regarding disclosing personal information and using SNS continuously. Adopting social influence process theory, we examine three enticements-the motivation of relationship management through SNS, the perceived usefulness of SNS for self-presentation, and the subjective social norms of using SNS. From a survey of 362 Facebook users who have disclosed personal information on Facebook, we find that the motivation of relationship management through SNS and the perceived usefulness of SNS for self-presentation lead users to disclose information but that subjective social norms do not, suggesting that the perceived benefit of behavior enticements should be assimilated into users' own value systems to truly operate as benefit factors. The results regarding the positive and negative effects of suggested benefit and cost factors on information disclosure show that only the combined positive effects of all three behavior enticements exceed the negative effect of privacy concerns, suggesting that privacy concerns can be offset only by multiple benefit factors.

0.04476511 = product of:
  0.08953022 = sum of:
    0.08953022 = product of:
      0.26859066 = sum of:
        0.26859066 = weight(_text_:3a in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.26859066 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.40963197 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04831699 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

Rez. in: Philosophisch-ethische Rezensionen vom 09.11.2019 (Jürgen Czogalla), Unter: https://philosophisch-ethische-rezensionen.de/rezension/Goedert1.html. In: B.I.T. online 23(2020) H.3, S.345-347 (W. Sühl-Strohmenger) [Unter: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.b-i-t-online.de%2Fheft%2F2020-03-rezensionen.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0iY3f_zNcvEjeZ6inHVnOK]. In: Open Password Nr. 805 vom 14.08.2020 (H.-C. Hobohm) [Unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzE0MywiOGI3NjZkZmNkZjQ1IiwwLDAsMTMxLDFd].

0.038370095 = product of:
  0.07674019 = sum of:
    0.07674019 = product of:
      0.23022056 = sum of:
        0.23022056 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.23022056 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.40963197 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04831699 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.

0.038370095 = product of:
  0.07674019 = sum of:
    0.07674019 = product of:
      0.23022056 = sum of:
        0.23022056 = weight(_text_:3a in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.23022056 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.40963197 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04831699 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

https%3A%2F%2Fjournals.univie.ac.at%2Findex.php%2Fvoebm%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F5332%2F5271%2F&usg=AOvVaw2yQdFGHlmOwVls7ANCpTii.

0.03197508 = product of:
  0.06395016 = sum of:
    0.06395016 = product of:
      0.19185047 = sum of:
        0.19185047 = weight(_text_:3a in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19185047 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.40963197 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04831699 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

PhD Dissertation at International Doctorate School in Information and Communication Technology. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fcore.ac.uk%2Fdownload%2Fpdf%2F150083013.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2n-qisNagpyT0lli_6QbAQ.

0.03197508 = product of:
  0.06395016 = sum of:
    0.06395016 = product of:
      0.19185047 = sum of:
        0.19185047 = weight(_text_:3a in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19185047 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.40963197 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04831699 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

Vgl. unter: https://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwizweHljdbcAhVS16QKHXcFD9QQFjABegQICRAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Fpublication%2F271200105_Die_Autonomie_des_Menschen_und_der_Maschine_-_gegenwartige_Definitionen_von_Autonomie_zwischen_philosophischem_Hintergrund_und_technologischer_Umsetzbarkeit_Redigierte_Version_der_Magisterarbeit_Karls&usg=AOvVaw06orrdJmFF2xbCCp_hL26q.

0.03197508 = product of:
  0.06395016 = sum of:
    0.06395016 = product of:
      0.19185047 = sum of:
        0.19185047 = weight(_text_:3a in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19185047 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.40963197 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04831699 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Vgl. auch: New automatic interpreter for complex UDC numbers. Unter: <https%3A%2F%2Fudcc.org%2Ffiles%2FAttilaPiros_EC_36-37_2014-2015.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3kc9CwDDCWP7aArpfjrs5b>

0.028257476 = product of:
  0.056514952 = sum of:
    0.056514952 = product of:
      0.113029905 = sum of:
        0.113029905 = weight(_text_:disclosure in 4127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.113029905 = score(doc=4127,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.40591347 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.401051 = idf(docFreq=26, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04831699 = queryNorm
            0.27845812 = fieldWeight in 4127, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.401051 = idf(docFreq=26, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=4127)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Inhalt: Super-Science, Fundamental Dimension, Way of Being: Library and Information Science in an Age of Messages / Bawden, David (et al.) (S.31-43) - The "Naturalization" of the Philosophy of Rafael Capurro: Logic, Information and Ethics / Brenner, Joseph E. (S.45-64) - Turing's Cyberworld / Eldred, Michael (S.65-81) - Hermeneutics and Information Science: The Ongoing Journey From Simple Objective Interpretation to Understanding Data as a Form of Disclosure / Kelly, Matthew (S.83-110) - The Epistemological Maturity of Information Science and the Debate Around Paradigms / Ribeiro, Fernanda (et al.) (S.111-124) - A Methodology for Studying Knowledge Creation in Organizational Settings: A Phenomenological Viewpoint / Suorsa, Anna (et al.) (S.125-142) - The Significance of Digital Hermeneutics for the Philosophy of Technology / Tripathi, Arun Kumar (S.143-157) - Reconciling Social Responsibility and Neutrality in LIS Professional Ethics: A Virtue Ethics Approach / Burgess, John T F (S.161-172) - Information Ethics in the Age of Digital Labour and the Surveillance-Industrial Complex / Fuchs, Christian (S.173-190) - Intercultural Information Ethics: A Pragmatic Consideration / Hongladarom, Soraj (S.191-206) - Ethics of European Institutions as Normative Foundation of Responsible Research and Innovation in ICT / Stahl, Bernd Carsten (S.207-219) - Raphael's / Holgate, John D. (S.223-245) - Understanding the Pulse of Existence: An Examination of Capurro's Angeletics / Morador, Fernando Flores (S.247-252) - The Demon in the Gap of Language: Capurro, Ethics and language in Divided Germany / Saldanha, Gustavo Silva (S.253-268) - General Intellect, Communication and Contemporary Media Theory / Frohmann, Bernd (S.271-286) - "Data": The data / Furner, Jonathan (S.287-306) - On the Pre-History of Library Ethics: Documents and Legitimacy / Hansson, Joacim (S.307-319) -