Search (829 results, page 1 of 42)

  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Linde, F.; Stock, W.G.: Informationsmarkt : Informationen im I-Commerce anbieten und nachfragen (2011) 0.13
    0.12958115 = product of:
      0.2591623 = sum of:
        0.2591623 = sum of:
          0.19513549 = weight(_text_:500 in 291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.19513549 = score(doc=291,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.36112627 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
                0.059071355 = queryNorm
              0.5403525 = fieldWeight in 291, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=291)
          0.064026825 = weight(_text_:22 in 291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.064026825 = score(doc=291,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20685782 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.059071355 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 291, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=291)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    23. 9.2010 11:15:22
    Pages
    500 S
  2. Dick, S.J.: Astronomy's Three Kingdom System : a comprehensive classification system of celestial objects (2019) 0.11
    0.114053026 = sum of:
      0.08604129 = product of:
        0.25812384 = sum of:
          0.25812384 = weight(_text_:objects in 5455) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.25812384 = score(doc=5455,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.31396845 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.059071355 = queryNorm
              0.82213306 = fieldWeight in 5455, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5455)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.028011736 = product of:
        0.05602347 = sum of:
          0.05602347 = weight(_text_:22 in 5455) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05602347 = score(doc=5455,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20685782 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.059071355 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5455, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5455)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Although classification has been an important aspect of astronomy since stellar spectroscopy in the late nineteenth century, to date no comprehensive classification system has existed for all classes of objects in the universe. Here we present such a system, and lay out its foundational definitions and principles. The system consists of the "Three Kingdoms" of planets, stars and galaxies, eighteen families, and eighty-two classes of objects. Gravitation is the defining organizing principle for the families and classes, and the physical nature of the objects is the defining characteristic of the classes. The system should prove useful for both scientific and pedagogical purposes.
    Date
    21.11.2019 18:46:22
  3. Lercher, A.: Correlation over time for citations to mathematics articles (2013) 0.11
    0.1062469 = product of:
      0.2124938 = sum of:
        0.2124938 = sum of:
          0.17247704 = weight(_text_:500 in 661) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.17247704 = score(doc=661,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.36112627 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
                0.059071355 = queryNorm
              0.47760868 = fieldWeight in 661, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=661)
          0.040016767 = weight(_text_:22 in 661) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.040016767 = score(doc=661,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20685782 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.059071355 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 661, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=661)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Explicit definition of the limits of citation analysis demands additional tests for the validity of citation analysis. The stability of citation rankings over time can be regarded as confirming the validity of evaluative citation analysis. This stability over time was investigated for two sets of citation records from the Web of Science (Thomson Reuters, Philadelphia, PA) for articles published in journals classified in Journal Citation Reports as Mathematics. These sets are of all such articles for the 1960s and for the 1970s. This study employs only descriptive statistics and draws no inferences to any larger population. The study found a high correlation from one decade to the next of rankings among sets of most highly cited articles. However, the study found a low correlation for rankings among articles whose ranks were the 500 directly below those of the 500 most cited. This perhaps expected result is discussed in terms of the Glänzel-Schubert-Schoepflin stochastic model for citation processes and also in connection with an account of the purposes of evaluative citation analysis. This interpretative context suggests why the limitations of citation analysis may be inherent to citation analysis even when it is done well.
    Date
    22. 3.2013 19:23:35
  4. Holetschek, J. et al.: Natural history in Europeana : accessing scientific collection objects via LOD (2016) 0.10
    0.10147483 = sum of:
      0.061458062 = product of:
        0.18437418 = sum of:
          0.18437418 = weight(_text_:objects in 3277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.18437418 = score(doc=3277,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.31396845 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.059071355 = queryNorm
              0.58723795 = fieldWeight in 3277, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3277)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.040016767 = product of:
        0.08003353 = sum of:
          0.08003353 = weight(_text_:22 in 3277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08003353 = score(doc=3277,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20685782 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.059071355 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3277, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3277)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
  5. Zeng, M.L.; Gracy, K.F.; Zumer, M.: Using a semantic analysis tool to generate subject access points : a study using Panofsky's theory and two research samples (2014) 0.10
    0.097185865 = product of:
      0.19437173 = sum of:
        0.19437173 = sum of:
          0.14635162 = weight(_text_:500 in 1464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.14635162 = score(doc=1464,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.36112627 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
                0.059071355 = queryNorm
              0.40526438 = fieldWeight in 1464, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1464)
          0.048020117 = weight(_text_:22 in 1464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.048020117 = score(doc=1464,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20685782 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.059071355 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1464, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1464)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.493-500
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  6. Scheidler, F.: Chaos : das neue Zeitalter der Revolutionen (2017) 0.10
    0.097185865 = product of:
      0.19437173 = sum of:
        0.19437173 = sum of:
          0.14635162 = weight(_text_:500 in 3850) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.14635162 = score(doc=3850,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.36112627 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
                0.059071355 = queryNorm
              0.40526438 = fieldWeight in 3850, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3850)
          0.048020117 = weight(_text_:22 in 3850) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.048020117 = score(doc=3850,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20685782 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.059071355 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3850, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3850)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Nach 500 Jahren Expansion ist die kapitalistische Megamaschine in die tiefste Krise ihrer Geschichte geraten. Wir bewegen uns in eine chaotische Übergangsphase hinein, die einige Jahrzehnte andauern kann und deren Ausgang vollkommen offen ist. Während die alten Ordnungen brüchig werden, entflammt ein Kampf darum, wer die Zukunft bestimmen wird. Bevorstehende Wellen der Digitalisierung führen zum Ende der Arbeitswelt, wie wir sie seit der Mechanisierung kennen. Dies hat auch einschneidende Folgen für das System der gesellschaftlichen Verteilung. Der Aufstieg Chinas wiederum steht im Zeichen eines geopolitischen Hegemoniewandels, der Europa - wie schon bis zum beginnenden 19. Jahrhundert - an den Rand drängen könnte. All dies sind untrügliche Zeichen einer Neudefinition von Ökonomie und einer Transformation von Staatlichkeit. Fabian Scheidler sieht in seinem neuen Buch "Chaos" darin auch eine Möglichkeit in Hinblick auf eine neue Friedensordnung.
    Date
    2.10.2017 12:22:26
  7. Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011) 0.09
    0.093820974 = product of:
      0.18764195 = sum of:
        0.18764195 = product of:
          0.5629258 = sum of:
            0.5629258 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.5629258 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.5008076 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.059071355 = queryNorm
                1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
  8. Benoit, G.; Hussey, L.: Repurposing digital objects : case studies across the publishing industry (2011) 0.09
    0.088852115 = sum of:
      0.06084038 = product of:
        0.18252113 = sum of:
          0.18252113 = weight(_text_:objects in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.18252113 = score(doc=4198,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.31396845 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.059071355 = queryNorm
              0.5813359 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.028011736 = product of:
        0.05602347 = sum of:
          0.05602347 = weight(_text_:22 in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05602347 = score(doc=4198,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20685782 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.059071355 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Large, data-rich organizations have tremendously large collections of digital objects to be "repurposed," to respond quickly and economically to publishing, marketing, and information needs. Some management typically assume that a content management system, or some other technique such as OWL and RDF, will automatically address the workflow and technical issues associated with this reuse. Four case studies show that the sources of some roadblocks to agile repurposing are as much managerial and organizational as they are technical in nature. The review concludes with suggestions on how digital object repurposing can be integrated given these organizations' structures.
    Date
    22. 1.2011 14:23:07
  9. Soulier, L.; Jabeur, L.B.; Tamine, L.; Bahsoun, W.: On ranking relevant entities in heterogeneous networks using a language-based model (2013) 0.08
    0.08098823 = product of:
      0.16197646 = sum of:
        0.16197646 = sum of:
          0.12195969 = weight(_text_:500 in 664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.12195969 = score(doc=664,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.36112627 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
                0.059071355 = queryNorm
              0.33772033 = fieldWeight in 664, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=664)
          0.040016767 = weight(_text_:22 in 664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.040016767 = score(doc=664,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20685782 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.059071355 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 664, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=664)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2013 19:34:49
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.3, S.500-515
  10. Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014) 0.08
    0.07818414 = product of:
      0.15636829 = sum of:
        0.15636829 = product of:
          0.46910486 = sum of:
            0.46910486 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.46910486 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.5008076 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.059071355 = queryNorm
                0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
  11. Ridenour, L.: Boundary objects : measuring gaps and overlap between research areas (2016) 0.08
    0.076158956 = sum of:
      0.052148893 = product of:
        0.15644668 = sum of:
          0.15644668 = weight(_text_:objects in 2835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.15644668 = score(doc=2835,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.31396845 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.059071355 = queryNorm
              0.49828792 = fieldWeight in 2835, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2835)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.024010058 = product of:
        0.048020117 = sum of:
          0.048020117 = weight(_text_:22 in 2835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.048020117 = score(doc=2835,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20685782 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.059071355 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2835, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2835)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The aim of this paper is to develop methodology to determine conceptual overlap between research areas. It investigates patterns of terminology usage in scientific abstracts as boundary objects between research specialties. Research specialties were determined by high-level classifications assigned by Thomson Reuters in their Essential Science Indicators file, which provided a strictly hierarchical classification of journals into 22 categories. Results from the query "network theory" were downloaded from the Web of Science. From this file, two top-level groups, economics and social sciences, were selected and topically analyzed to provide a baseline of similarity on which to run an informetric analysis. The Places & Spaces Map of Science (Klavans and Boyack 2007) was used to determine the proximity of disciplines to one another in order to select the two disciplines use in the analysis. Groups analyzed share common theories and goals; however, groups used different language to describe their research. It was found that 61% of term words were shared between the two groups.
  12. Ortega, C.D.: Conceptual and procedural grounding of documentary systems (2012) 0.07
    0.07323263 = sum of:
      0.053224247 = product of:
        0.15967274 = sum of:
          0.15967274 = weight(_text_:objects in 143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.15967274 = score(doc=143,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.31396845 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.059071355 = queryNorm
              0.508563 = fieldWeight in 143, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=143)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.020008383 = product of:
        0.040016767 = sum of:
          0.040016767 = weight(_text_:22 in 143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.040016767 = score(doc=143,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20685782 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.059071355 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 143, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=143)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Documentary activities are informational operations of selection and representation of objects made from their features and predictable use. In order to make them more dynamic, these activities are carried out systemically, according to institutionally limited (in the sense of social institution) information projects. This organic approach leads to the constitution of information systems, or, more specifically, systems of documentary information, inasmuch as they refer to actions about documents as objects from which information is produced. Thus, systems of documentary information are called documentary systems. This article aims to list and systematize elements with the potential to a generalizing and categorical approach of documentary systems. We approach the systems according to: elements of reference (the documents and their information, the users, and the institutional context); constitutive elements (collection and references); structural elements (constituent units and the relation among them); modes of production (pre or post representation of the document); management aspects (flow of documents and of their information); and, finally, typology (management systems and information retrieval systems). Thus, documentary systems can be considered products due to operations involving objects institutionally limited for the production of collections (virtual or not) and their references, whose objective is the appropriation of information by the user.
    Content
    Beitrag einer Section "Selected Papers from the 1ST Brazilian Conference on Knowledge Organization And Representation, Faculdade de Ciência da Informação, Campus Universitário Darcy Ribeiro Brasília, DF Brasil, October 20-22, 2011" Vgl.: http://www.ergon-verlag.de/isko_ko/downloads/ko_39_2012_3_h.pdf.
  13. Zornic, N.; Markovic, A.; Jeremic, V.: How the top 500 ARWU can provide a misleading rank (2014) 0.07
    0.07317581 = product of:
      0.14635162 = sum of:
        0.14635162 = product of:
          0.29270324 = sum of:
            0.29270324 = weight(_text_:500 in 1279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.29270324 = score(doc=1279,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.36112627 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.059071355 = queryNorm
                0.81052876 = fieldWeight in 1279, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1279)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  14. Perugini, S.: Supporting multiple paths to objects in information hierarchies : faceted classification, faceted search, and symbolic links (2010) 0.07
    0.071032375 = sum of:
      0.043020643 = product of:
        0.12906192 = sum of:
          0.12906192 = weight(_text_:objects in 4227) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.12906192 = score(doc=4227,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.31396845 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.059071355 = queryNorm
              0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 4227, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4227)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.028011736 = product of:
        0.05602347 = sum of:
          0.05602347 = weight(_text_:22 in 4227) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05602347 = score(doc=4227,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20685782 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.059071355 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4227, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4227)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 46(2010) no.1, S.22-43
  15. Madalli, D.P.; Balaji, B.P.; Sarangi, A.K.: Music domain analysis for building faceted ontological representation (2014) 0.07
    0.071032375 = sum of:
      0.043020643 = product of:
        0.12906192 = sum of:
          0.12906192 = weight(_text_:objects in 1437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.12906192 = score(doc=1437,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.31396845 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.059071355 = queryNorm
              0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 1437, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1437)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.028011736 = product of:
        0.05602347 = sum of:
          0.05602347 = weight(_text_:22 in 1437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05602347 = score(doc=1437,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20685782 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.059071355 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1437, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1437)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper describes to construct faceted ontologies for domain modeling. Building upon the faceted theory of S.R. Ranganathan (1967), the paper intends to address the faceted classification approach applied to build domain ontologies. As classificatory ontologies are employed to represent the relationships of entities and objects on the web, the faceted approach helps to analyze domain representation in an effective way for modeling. Based on this perspective, an ontology of the music domain has been analyzed that would serve as a case study.
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  16. Herrmann, D.B.: ¬Die Harmonie des Universums : von der rätselhaften Schönheit der Naturgesetze (2017) 0.07
    0.06899081 = product of:
      0.13798162 = sum of:
        0.13798162 = product of:
          0.27596325 = sum of:
            0.27596325 = weight(_text_:500 in 3704) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.27596325 = score(doc=3704,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.36112627 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.059071355 = queryNorm
                0.76417387 = fieldWeight in 3704, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3704)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Classification
    500 / 23sdnb
    DDC
    500 / 23sdnb
  17. Boerner, K.: Atlas of science : visualizing what we know (2010) 0.06
    0.06479058 = product of:
      0.12958115 = sum of:
        0.12958115 = sum of:
          0.097567745 = weight(_text_:500 in 3359) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.097567745 = score(doc=3359,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.36112627 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
                0.059071355 = queryNorm
              0.27017626 = fieldWeight in 3359, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3359)
          0.032013413 = weight(_text_:22 in 3359) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.032013413 = score(doc=3359,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20685782 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.059071355 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3359, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3359)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Cartographic maps have guided our explorations for centuries, allowing us to navigate the world. Science maps have the potential to guide our search for knowledge in the same way, helping us navigate, understand, and communicate the dynamic and changing structure of science and technology. Allowing us to visualize scientific results, science maps help us make sense of the avalanche of data generated by scientific research today. Atlas of Science, features more than thirty full-page science maps, fifty data charts, a timeline of science-mapping milestones, and 500 color images; it serves as a sumptuous visual index to the evolution of modern science and as an introduction to "the science of science"--charting the trajectory from scientific concept to published results. Atlas of Science, based on the popular exhibit "Places & Spaces: Mapping Science," describes and displays successful mapping techniques. The heart of the book is a visual feast: Claudius Ptolemy's Cosmographia World Map from 1482; a guide to a PhD thesis that resembles a subway map; "the structure of science" as revealed in a map of citation relationships in papers published in 2002; a periodic table; a history flow visualization of the Wikipedia article on abortion; a globe showing the worldwide distribution of patents; a forecast of earthquake risk; hands-on science maps for kids; and many more. Each entry includes the story behind the map and biographies of its makers. Not even the most brilliant minds can keep up with today's deluge of scientific results. Science maps show us the landscape of what we know. Exhibition Ongoing National Science Foundation, Washington, D.C. The Institute for Research Information and Quality Assurance, Bonn, Germany Storm Hall, San Diego State College
    Date
    22. 1.2017 17:12:16
  18. Dufour, C.; Bartlett, J.C.; Toms, E.G.: Understanding how webcasts are used as sources of information (2011) 0.06
    0.0634658 = sum of:
      0.043457415 = product of:
        0.13037224 = sum of:
          0.13037224 = weight(_text_:objects in 4195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.13037224 = score(doc=4195,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.31396845 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.059071355 = queryNorm
              0.41523993 = fieldWeight in 4195, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4195)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.020008383 = product of:
        0.040016767 = sum of:
          0.040016767 = weight(_text_:22 in 4195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.040016767 = score(doc=4195,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20685782 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.059071355 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4195, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4195)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Webcasting systems were developed to provide remote access in real-time to live events. Today, these systems have an additional requirement: to accommodate the "second life" of webcasts as archival information objects. Research to date has focused on facilitating the production and storage of webcasts as well as the development of more interactive and collaborative multimedia tools to support the event, but research has not examined how people interact with a webcasting system to access and use the contents of those archived events. Using an experimental design, this study examined how 16 typical users interact with a webcasting system to respond to a set of information tasks: selecting a webcast, searching for specific information, and making a gist of a webcast. Using several data sources that included user actions, user perceptions, and user explanations of their actions and decisions, the study also examined the strategies employed to complete the tasks. The results revealed distinctive system-use patterns for each task and provided insights into the types of tools needed to make webcasting systems better suited for also using the webcasts as information objects.
    Date
    22. 1.2011 14:16:14
  19. Moskovitch, R.; Wang, F.; Pei, J.; Friedman, C.: JASIST special issue on biomedical information retrieval : Editorial (2017) 0.06
    0.060979843 = product of:
      0.12195969 = sum of:
        0.12195969 = product of:
          0.24391937 = sum of:
            0.24391937 = weight(_text_:500 in 4118) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.24391937 = score(doc=4118,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.36112627 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.059071355 = queryNorm
                0.67544067 = fieldWeight in 4118, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4118)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/asi.23972/full. Vgl. das Erratum in JASIST 69(2018) no.3, S.500.
  20. Copeland, A.J.; Barreau, D.: Helping people to manage and share their digital information : a role for public libraries (2011) 0.06
    0.060884897 = sum of:
      0.03687484 = product of:
        0.11062451 = sum of:
          0.11062451 = weight(_text_:objects in 5583) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11062451 = score(doc=5583,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.31396845 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.059071355 = queryNorm
              0.35234275 = fieldWeight in 5583, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5583)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.024010058 = product of:
        0.048020117 = sum of:
          0.048020117 = weight(_text_:22 in 5583) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.048020117 = score(doc=5583,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20685782 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.059071355 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5583, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5583)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    As a cultural institution, the public library is charged with providing resources and services that fit the needs of a particular community and, if space and budgets allow, of serving as a resource and repository of the community's past. To fulfill its mission to the public, the library must attract that public by offering materials and providing opportunities for them to pursue their unique and varied interests and discover new things. By engaging individuals in the identification and preservation of their own personal, digital objects, it may be possible to increase awareness in, and commitment to, community repositories that reflect a community's diversity and that will serve all. A user education program that focuses on the importance of identifying and preserving the information and artifacts that are important, that addresses the technical aspects of preservation, and that creates awareness of the benefits and challenges associated with sharing personal information can result in a community repository that ultimately has more value for both the individual and the community.
    Date
    11.12.2019 17:47:22

Authors

Languages

  • e 624
  • d 192
  • a 1
  • f 1
  • hu 1
  • pt 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 715
  • el 77
  • m 63
  • s 18
  • x 14
  • r 9
  • b 5
  • i 1
  • z 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications