Search (2076 results, page 1 of 104)

  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Farnel, S.; Shiri, A.; Campbell, S.; Cockney, C.; Rathi, D.; Stobbs, R.: ¬A community-driven metadata framework for describing cultural resources : the Digital Library North Project (2017) 0.30
    0.29901704 = product of:
      0.3986894 = sum of:
        0.1581473 = weight(_text_:digital in 5149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1581473 = score(doc=5149,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.23183343 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05877307 = queryNorm
            0.6821592 = fieldWeight in 5149, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5149)
        0.07027044 = weight(_text_:library in 5149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07027044 = score(doc=5149,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.15453665 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05877307 = queryNorm
            0.45471698 = fieldWeight in 5149, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5149)
        0.17027164 = sum of:
          0.114531055 = weight(_text_:project in 5149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.114531055 = score(doc=5149,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.24808002 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05877307 = queryNorm
              0.4616698 = fieldWeight in 5149, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5149)
          0.055740576 = weight(_text_:22 in 5149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.055740576 = score(doc=5149,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20581327 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05877307 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5149, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5149)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    This article describes the Digital Library North (DLN) project, a collaboration among researchers at the University of Alberta, staff at the Inuvialuit Cultural Resource Centre, and communities within the Inuvialuit Settlement Region (ISR) to develop a culturally appropriate metadata framework for a digital library of cultural resources. It will discuss gathering of data to inform the first iteration of the metadata framework and digital library prototype, as well as revisions made to both the framework and the digital library based on feedback obtained through community interaction with the prototype.
    Date
    18. 3.2019 14:16:22
  2. Sturmane, A.; Eglite, E.; Jankevica-Balode, M.: Subject metadata development for digital resources in Latvia (2014) 0.27
    0.26919043 = sum of:
      0.042803407 = product of:
        0.12841022 = sum of:
          0.12841022 = weight(_text_:objects in 1963) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.12841022 = score(doc=1963,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.31238306 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05877307 = queryNorm
              0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 1963, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1963)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.14145125 = weight(_text_:digital in 1963) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.14145125 = score(doc=1963,freq=8.0), product of:
          0.23183343 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05877307 = queryNorm
          0.61014175 = fieldWeight in 1963, product of:
            2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
              8.0 = termFreq=8.0
            3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1963)
      0.04444293 = weight(_text_:library in 1963) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04444293 = score(doc=1963,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.15453665 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05877307 = queryNorm
          0.28758827 = fieldWeight in 1963, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1963)
      0.04049284 = product of:
        0.08098568 = sum of:
          0.08098568 = weight(_text_:project in 1963) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08098568 = score(doc=1963,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24808002 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05877307 = queryNorm
              0.32644984 = fieldWeight in 1963, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1963)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The National Library of Latvia (NLL) made a decision to use the Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) in 2000. At present the NLL Subject Headings Database in Latvian holds approximately 34,000 subject headings and is used for subject cataloging of textual resources, including articles from serials. For digital objects NLL uses a system like Faceted Application of Subject Terminology (FAST). We succesfully use it in the project "In Search of Lost Latvia," one of the milestones in the development of the subject cataloging of digital resources in Latvia.
    Footnote
    Contribution in a special issue "Beyond libraries: Subject metadata in the digital environment and Semantic Web" - Enthält Beiträge der gleichnamigen IFLA Satellite Post-Conference, 17-18 August 2012, Tallinn.
  3. Hardesty, J.L.; Young, J.B.: ¬The semantics of metadata : Avalon Media System and the move to RDF (2017) 0.24
    0.24498534 = sum of:
      0.036688637 = product of:
        0.11006591 = sum of:
          0.11006591 = weight(_text_:objects in 3896) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11006591 = score(doc=3896,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.31238306 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05877307 = queryNorm
              0.35234275 = fieldWeight in 3896, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3896)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.12124394 = weight(_text_:digital in 3896) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.12124394 = score(doc=3896,freq=8.0), product of:
          0.23183343 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05877307 = queryNorm
          0.52297866 = fieldWeight in 3896, product of:
            2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
              8.0 = termFreq=8.0
            3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3896)
      0.026936483 = weight(_text_:library in 3896) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.026936483 = score(doc=3896,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15453665 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05877307 = queryNorm
          0.17430481 = fieldWeight in 3896, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3896)
      0.060116284 = product of:
        0.12023257 = sum of:
          0.12023257 = weight(_text_:project in 3896) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.12023257 = score(doc=3896,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.24808002 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05877307 = queryNorm
              0.48465237 = fieldWeight in 3896, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3896)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The Avalon Media System (Avalon) provides access and management for digital audio and video collections in libraries and archives. The open source project is led by the libraries of Indiana University Bloomington and Northwestern University and is funded in part by grants from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Institute of Museum and Library Services. Avalon is based on the Samvera Community (formerly Hydra Project) software stack and uses Fedora as the digital repository back end. The Avalon project team is in the process of migrating digital repositories from Fedora 3 to Fedora 4 and incorporating metadata statements using the Resource Description Framework (RDF) instead of XML files accompanying the digital objects in the repository. The Avalon team has worked on the migration path for technical metadata and is now working on the migration paths for structural metadata (PCDM) and descriptive metadata (from MODS XML to RDF). This paper covers the decisions made to begin using RDF for software development and offers a window into how Semantic Web technology functions in the real world.
  4. Copeland, A.J.; Barreau, D.: Helping people to manage and share their digital information : a role for public libraries (2011) 0.19
    0.19296521 = sum of:
      0.036688637 = product of:
        0.11006591 = sum of:
          0.11006591 = weight(_text_:objects in 5583) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11006591 = score(doc=5583,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.31238306 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05877307 = queryNorm
              0.35234275 = fieldWeight in 5583, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5583)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.08573241 = weight(_text_:digital in 5583) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08573241 = score(doc=5583,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.23183343 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05877307 = queryNorm
          0.36980176 = fieldWeight in 5583, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5583)
      0.04665536 = weight(_text_:library in 5583) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04665536 = score(doc=5583,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.15453665 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05877307 = queryNorm
          0.30190483 = fieldWeight in 5583, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5583)
      0.023888817 = product of:
        0.047777634 = sum of:
          0.047777634 = weight(_text_:22 in 5583) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.047777634 = score(doc=5583,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20581327 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05877307 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5583, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5583)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    As a cultural institution, the public library is charged with providing resources and services that fit the needs of a particular community and, if space and budgets allow, of serving as a resource and repository of the community's past. To fulfill its mission to the public, the library must attract that public by offering materials and providing opportunities for them to pursue their unique and varied interests and discover new things. By engaging individuals in the identification and preservation of their own personal, digital objects, it may be possible to increase awareness in, and commitment to, community repositories that reflect a community's diversity and that will serve all. A user education program that focuses on the importance of identifying and preserving the information and artifacts that are important, that addresses the technical aspects of preservation, and that creates awareness of the benefits and challenges associated with sharing personal information can result in a community repository that ultimately has more value for both the individual and the community.
    Date
    11.12.2019 17:47:22
    Source
    Library trends. 59(2011) no.4, S.637-649
  5. Bartczak, J.; Glendon, I.: Python, Google Sheets, and the Thesaurus for Graphic Materials for efficient metadata project workflows (2017) 0.18
    0.18406567 = sum of:
      0.036688637 = product of:
        0.11006591 = sum of:
          0.11006591 = weight(_text_:objects in 3893) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11006591 = score(doc=3893,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.31238306 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05877307 = queryNorm
              0.35234275 = fieldWeight in 3893, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3893)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.08573241 = weight(_text_:digital in 3893) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08573241 = score(doc=3893,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.23183343 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05877307 = queryNorm
          0.36980176 = fieldWeight in 3893, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3893)
      0.026936483 = weight(_text_:library in 3893) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.026936483 = score(doc=3893,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15453665 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05877307 = queryNorm
          0.17430481 = fieldWeight in 3893, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3893)
      0.03470815 = product of:
        0.0694163 = sum of:
          0.0694163 = weight(_text_:project in 3893) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0694163 = score(doc=3893,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24808002 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05877307 = queryNorm
              0.27981415 = fieldWeight in 3893, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3893)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In 2017, the University of Virginia (U.Va.) will launch a two year initiative to celebrate the bicentennial anniversary of the University's founding in 1819. The U.Va. Library is participating in this event by digitizing some 20,000 photographs and negatives that document student life on the U.Va. grounds in the 1960s and 1970s. Metadata librarians and archivists are well-versed in the challenges associated with generating digital content and accompanying description within the context of limited resources. This paper describes how technology and new approaches to metadata design have enabled the University of Virginia's Metadata Analysis and Design Department to rapidly and successfully generate accurate description for these digital objects. Python's pandas module improves efficiency by cleaning and repurposing data recorded at digitization, while the lxml module builds MODS XML programmatically from CSV tables. A simplified technique for subject heading selection and assignment in Google Sheets provides a collaborative environment for streamlined metadata creation and data quality control.
  6. Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Semantic Digital Archives held in conjunction with the 16th Int. Conference on Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries (TPDL) on September 27, 2012 in Paphos, Cyprus (2012) 0.16
    0.15879396 = product of:
      0.21172528 = sum of:
        0.018344318 = product of:
          0.055032954 = sum of:
            0.055032954 = weight(_text_:objects in 468) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055032954 = score(doc=468,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.31238306 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05877307 = queryNorm
                0.17617138 = fieldWeight in 468, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=468)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.16039065 = weight(_text_:digital in 468) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16039065 = score(doc=468,freq=56.0), product of:
            0.23183343 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05877307 = queryNorm
            0.6918357 = fieldWeight in 468, product of:
              7.483315 = tf(freq=56.0), with freq of:
                56.0 = termFreq=56.0
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=468)
        0.03299032 = weight(_text_:library in 468) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03299032 = score(doc=468,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.15453665 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05877307 = queryNorm
            0.21347894 = fieldWeight in 468, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=468)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    Archival Information Systems (AIS) are becoming increasingly important. For decades, the amount of content created digitally is growing and its complete life cycle nowadays tends to remain digital. A selection of this content is expected to be of value for the future and can thus be considered being part of our cultural heritage. However, digital content poses many challenges for long-term or indefinite preservation, e.g. digital publications become increasingly complex by the embedding of different kinds of multimedia, data in arbitrary formats and software. As soon as these digital publications become obsolete, but are still deemed to be of value in the future, they have to be transferred smoothly into appropriate AIS where they need to be kept accessible even through changing technologies. The successful previous SDA workshop in 2011 showed: Both, the library and the archiving community have made valuable contributions to the management of huge amounts of knowledge and data. However, both are approaching this topic from different views which shall be brought together to cross-fertilize each other. There are promising combinations of pertinence and provenance models since those are traditionally the prevailing knowledge organization principles of the library and archiving community, respectively. Another scientific discipline providing promising technical solutions for knowledge representation and knowledge management is semantic technologies, which is supported by appropriate W3C recommendations and a large user community. At the forefront of making the semantic web a mature and applicable reality is the linked data initiative, which already has started to be adopted by the library community. It can be expected that using semantic (web) technologies in general and linked data in particular can mature the area of digital archiving as well as technologically tighten the natural bond between digital libraries and digital archives. Semantic representations of contextual knowledge about cultural heritage objects will enhance organization and access of data and knowledge. In order to achieve a comprehensive investigation, the information seeking and document triage behaviors of users (an area also classified under the field of Human Computer Interaction) will also be included in the research.
    One of the major challenges of digital archiving is how to deal with changing technologies and changing user communities. On the one hand software, hardware and (multimedia) data formats that become obsolete and are not supported anymore still need to be kept accessible. On the other hand changing user communities necessitate technical means to formalize, detect and measure knowledge evolution. Furthermore, digital archival records are usually not deleted from the AIS and therefore, the amount of digitally archived (multimedia) content can be expected to grow rapidly. Therefore, efficient storage management solutions geared to the fact that cultural heritage is not as frequently accessed like up-to-date content residing in a digital library are required. Software and hardware needs to be tightly connected based on sophisticated knowledge representation and management models in order to face that challenge. In line with the above, contributions to the workshop should focus on, but are not limited to:
    Semantic search & semantic information retrieval in digital archives and digital libraries Semantic multimedia archives Ontologies & linked data for digital archives and digital libraries Ontologies & linked data for multimedia archives Implementations and evaluations of semantic digital archives Visualization and exploration of digital content User interfaces for semantic digital libraries User interfaces for intelligent multimedia information retrieval User studies focusing on end-user needs and information seeking behavior of end-users Theoretical and practical archiving frameworks using Semantic (Web) technologies Logical theories for digital archives Semantic (Web) services implementing the OAIS standard Semantic or logical provenance models for digital archives or digital libraries Information integration/semantic ingest (e.g. from digital libraries) Trust for ingest and data security/integrity check for long-term storage of archival records Semantic extensions of emulation/virtualization methodologies tailored for digital archives Semantic long-term storage and hardware organization tailored for AIS Migration strategies based on Semantic (Web) technologies Knowledge evolution We expect new insights and results for sustainable technical solutions for digital archiving using knowledge management techniques based on semantic technologies. The workshop emphasizes interdisciplinarity and aims at an audience consisting of scientists and scholars from the digital library, digital archiving, multimedia technology and semantic web community, the information and library sciences, as well as, from the social sciences and (digital) humanities, in particular people working on the mentioned topics. We encourage end-users, practitioners and policy-makers from cultural heritage institutions to participate as well.
  7. Benoit, G.; Hussey, L.: Repurposing digital objects : case studies across the publishing industry (2011) 0.16
    0.15817787 = product of:
      0.21090382 = sum of:
        0.060533162 = product of:
          0.18159948 = sum of:
            0.18159948 = weight(_text_:objects in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.18159948 = score(doc=4198,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.31238306 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05877307 = queryNorm
                0.5813359 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.12250038 = weight(_text_:digital in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12250038 = score(doc=4198,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.23183343 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05877307 = queryNorm
            0.5283983 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
        0.027870288 = product of:
          0.055740576 = sum of:
            0.055740576 = weight(_text_:22 in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055740576 = score(doc=4198,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20581327 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05877307 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    Large, data-rich organizations have tremendously large collections of digital objects to be "repurposed," to respond quickly and economically to publishing, marketing, and information needs. Some management typically assume that a content management system, or some other technique such as OWL and RDF, will automatically address the workflow and technical issues associated with this reuse. Four case studies show that the sources of some roadblocks to agile repurposing are as much managerial and organizational as they are technical in nature. The review concludes with suggestions on how digital object repurposing can be integrated given these organizations' structures.
    Date
    22. 1.2011 14:23:07
  8. González, P.U.: ¬A strategy for integrating printed catalog cards from three Cuban libraries into the open linked data space : on liberty, attention engineering, and learning analytics (2019) 0.16
    0.15557711 = product of:
      0.20743614 = sum of:
        0.12250038 = weight(_text_:digital in 5515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12250038 = score(doc=5515,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.23183343 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05877307 = queryNorm
            0.5283983 = fieldWeight in 5515, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5515)
        0.04444293 = weight(_text_:library in 5515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04444293 = score(doc=5515,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15453665 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05877307 = queryNorm
            0.28758827 = fieldWeight in 5515, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5515)
        0.04049284 = product of:
          0.08098568 = sum of:
            0.08098568 = weight(_text_:project in 5515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08098568 = score(doc=5515,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24808002 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05877307 = queryNorm
                0.32644984 = fieldWeight in 5515, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5515)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    This article summarizes the main aspects of the strategy created as the result of the project to integrate printed catalogs into Cuban digital library spaces and the internet in general. It also describes the status of the initiative and offers reflections on the relationship between the ongoing parallel development of online catalogs, digital libraries, and digital repositories of cultural patrimony, highlighting opportunities to make use of linked data techniques for these purposes.
    Source
    Library trends. 67(2019) no.4, S.713-728
  9. Gracy, K.F.; Zeng, M.L.; Skirvin, L.: Exploring methods to improve access to Music resources by aligning library Data with Linked Data : a report of methodologies and preliminary findings (2013) 0.15
    0.15241003 = product of:
      0.20321336 = sum of:
        0.040414643 = weight(_text_:digital in 1096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040414643 = score(doc=1096,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23183343 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05877307 = queryNorm
            0.17432621 = fieldWeight in 1096, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1096)
        0.05079192 = weight(_text_:library in 1096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05079192 = score(doc=1096,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.15453665 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05877307 = queryNorm
            0.32867232 = fieldWeight in 1096, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1096)
        0.1120068 = sum of:
          0.080155045 = weight(_text_:project in 1096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.080155045 = score(doc=1096,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.24808002 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05877307 = queryNorm
              0.32310158 = fieldWeight in 1096, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1096)
          0.031851757 = weight(_text_:22 in 1096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.031851757 = score(doc=1096,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20581327 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05877307 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1096, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1096)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    As a part of a research project aiming to connect library data to the unfamiliar data sets available in the Linked Data (LD) community's CKAN Data Hub (thedatahub.org), this project collected, analyzed, and mapped properties used in describing and accessing music recordings, scores, and music-related information used by selected music LD data sets, library catalogs, and various digital collections created by libraries and other cultural institutions. This article reviews current efforts to connect music data through the Semantic Web, with an emphasis on the Music Ontology (MO) and ontology alignment approaches; it also presents a framework for understanding the life cycle of a musical work, focusing on the central activities of composition, performance, and use. The project studied metadata structures and properties of 11 music-related LD data sets and mapped them to the descriptions commonly used in the library cataloging records for sound recordings and musical scores (including MARC records and their extended schema.org markup), and records from 20 collections of digitized music recordings and scores (featuring a variety of metadata structures). The analysis resulted in a set of crosswalks and a unified crosswalk that aligns these properties. The paper reports on detailed methodologies used and discusses research findings and issues. Topics of particular concern include (a) the challenges of mapping between the overgeneralized descriptions found in library data and the specialized, music-oriented properties present in the LD data sets; (b) the hidden information and access points in library data; and (c) the potential benefits of enriching library data through the mapping of properties found in library catalogs to similar properties used by LD data sets.
    Date
    28.10.2013 17:22:17
  10. Stevens, G.: New metadata recipes for old cookbooks : creating and analyzing a digital collection using the HathiTrust Research Center Portal (2017) 0.15
    0.14610317 = product of:
      0.19480422 = sum of:
        0.112962365 = weight(_text_:digital in 3897) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.112962365 = score(doc=3897,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.23183343 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05877307 = queryNorm
            0.4872566 = fieldWeight in 3897, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3897)
        0.03174495 = weight(_text_:library in 3897) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03174495 = score(doc=3897,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15453665 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05877307 = queryNorm
            0.2054202 = fieldWeight in 3897, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3897)
        0.050096903 = product of:
          0.100193806 = sum of:
            0.100193806 = weight(_text_:project in 3897) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.100193806 = score(doc=3897,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.24808002 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05877307 = queryNorm
                0.40387696 = fieldWeight in 3897, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3897)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    The Early American Cookbooks digital project is a case study in analyzing collections as data using HathiTrust and the HathiTrust Research Center (HTRC) Portal. The purposes of the project are to create a freely available, searchable collection of full-text early American cookbooks within the HathiTrust Digital Library, to offer an overview of the scope and contents of the collection, and to analyze trends and patterns in the metadata and the full text of the collection. The digital project has two basic components: a collection of 1450 full-text cookbooks published in the United States between 1800 and 1920 and a website to present a guide to the collection and the results of the analysis. This article will focus on the workflow for analyzing the metadata and the full-text of the collection. The workflow will cover: 1) creating a searchable public collection of full-text titles within the HathiTrust Digital Library and uploading it to the HTRC Portal, 2) analyzing and visualizing legacy MARC data for the collection using MarcEdit, OpenRefine and Tableau, and 3) using the text analysis tools in the HTRC Portal to look for trends and patterns in the full text of the collection.
  11. Gradmann, S.: Knowledge = Information in context : on the importance of semantic contextualisation in Europeana (2010) 0.15
    0.14514013 = sum of:
      0.024459092 = product of:
        0.073377274 = sum of:
          0.073377274 = weight(_text_:objects in 3475) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.073377274 = score(doc=3475,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.31238306 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05877307 = queryNorm
              0.23489517 = fieldWeight in 3475, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3475)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.07000022 = weight(_text_:digital in 3475) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07000022 = score(doc=3475,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.23183343 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05877307 = queryNorm
          0.30194187 = fieldWeight in 3475, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3475)
      0.017957656 = weight(_text_:library in 3475) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.017957656 = score(doc=3475,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15453665 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05877307 = queryNorm
          0.11620321 = fieldWeight in 3475, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3475)
      0.03272316 = product of:
        0.06544632 = sum of:
          0.06544632 = weight(_text_:project in 3475) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06544632 = score(doc=3475,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.24808002 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05877307 = queryNorm
              0.26381132 = fieldWeight in 3475, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3475)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    "Europeana.eu is about ideas and inspiration. It links you to 6 million digital items." This is the opening statement taken from the Europeana WWW-site (http://www.europeana.eu/portal/aboutus.html), and it clearly is concerned with the mission of Europeana - without, however, being over-explicit as to the precise nature of that mission. Europeana's current logo, too, has a programmatic aspect: the slogan "Think Culture" clearly again is related to Europeana's mission and at same time seems somewhat closer to the point: 'thinking' culture evokes notions like conceptualisation, reasoning, semantics and the like. Still, all this remains fragmentary and insufficient to actually clarify the functional scope and mission of Europeana. In fact, the author of the present contribution is convinced that Europeana has too often been described in terms of sheer quantity, as a high volume aggregation of digital representations of cultural heritage objects without sufficiently stressing the functional aspects of this endeavour. This conviction motivates the present contribution on some of the essential functional aspects of Europeana making clear that such a contribution - even if its author is deeply involved in building Europeana - should not be read as an official statement of the project or of the European Commission (which it is not!) - but as the personal statement from an information science perspective! From this perspective the opening statement is that Europeana is much more than a machine for mechanical accumulation of object representations but that one of its main characteristics should be to enable the generation of knowledge pertaining to cultural artefacts. The rest of the paper is about the implications of this initial statement in terms of information science, on the way we technically prepare to implement the necessary data structures and functionality and on the novel functionality Europeana will offer based on these elements and which go well beyond the 'traditional' digital library paradigm. However, prior to exploring these areas it may be useful to recall the notion of 'knowledge' that forms the basis of this contribution and which in turn is part of the well known continuum reaching from data via information and knowledge to wisdom.
    Content
    Vgl. unter: http://version1.europeana.eu/web/europeana-project/whitepapers.
  12. Seeman, D.: Naming names : the ethics of identification in digital library metadata (2012) 0.14
    0.14070785 = product of:
      0.18761048 = sum of:
        0.068365246 = product of:
          0.20509572 = sum of:
            0.20509572 = weight(_text_:objects in 416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.20509572 = score(doc=416,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.31238306 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05877307 = queryNorm
                0.656552 = fieldWeight in 416, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=416)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.087500274 = weight(_text_:digital in 416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.087500274 = score(doc=416,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.23183343 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05877307 = queryNorm
            0.37742734 = fieldWeight in 416, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=416)
        0.03174495 = weight(_text_:library in 416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03174495 = score(doc=416,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15453665 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05877307 = queryNorm
            0.2054202 = fieldWeight in 416, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=416)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    In many digital libraries, visual objects are published and metadata attached to allow for search and retrieval. For visual objects in which people appear, names are often added to the metadata so that digital library users can search for people appearing in these objects. Although this seems straightforward, there are ethical implications of adding names to metadata for visual objects. This paper explores the impact of this action and discusses relevant ethical issues it raises. It asserts that an individual's right to privacy and control over personal information must be weighed against the benefit of the object to society and the professional ethic to authentically represent a resource through its metadata. Context and an understanding of the major ethical issues will inform the practical decision of whether to keep objects online and add metadata to them, but items should generally be published unless there are clear ethical violations or a community relationship is in jeopardy.
  13. Sinn, D.; Soares, N.: Historians' use of digital archival collections : the web, historical scholarship, and archival research (2014) 0.14
    0.13990398 = product of:
      0.27980796 = sum of:
        0.18214634 = weight(_text_:digital in 1349) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18214634 = score(doc=1349,freq=26.0), product of:
            0.23183343 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05877307 = queryNorm
            0.7856777 = fieldWeight in 1349, product of:
              5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
                26.0 = termFreq=26.0
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1349)
        0.097661614 = sum of:
          0.057846915 = weight(_text_:project in 1349) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.057846915 = score(doc=1349,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24808002 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05877307 = queryNorm
              0.23317845 = fieldWeight in 1349, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1349)
          0.0398147 = weight(_text_:22 in 1349) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0398147 = score(doc=1349,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20581327 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05877307 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1349, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1349)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    This article reports a research study about historians' experiences using digital archival collections for research articles that they published in the American Historical Review. We contacted these authors to ask about their research processes, with regard to digital archival collections, and their perceptions of the usefulness of digital archival collections to historical research. This study presents a realistic portrayal of the "uses" and "impacts" of digital primary sources from the perspectives of historians who use digital collections for their research projects. The findings from this study indicate that digital archival collections are important source materials for historical studies for various reasons. However, the amount of authority digital materials possess as historical resources was disputed. Many historians preferred documents in their original form, but historians' preferences began to change as they increasingly consulted digital formats. As the web has developed into an important research platform, historians have adopted different research patterns, one of which is using random web searches to find digital primary sources. Historians' understandings of the "use" of digital archival collections revealed a spectrum of activities including finding, understanding, interpreting, and citing digital information. Historians in this study worked concurrently on multiple studies or on a larger project for a book, and each of their searches for digital collections had the potential to provide them with useful results for several research studies.
    Date
    22. 8.2014 17:03:50
  14. Xie, I.; Matusiak, K.M.: Discover digital libraries : theory and practice (2016) 0.14
    0.13907361 = product of:
      0.27814722 = sum of:
        0.22136013 = weight(_text_:digital in 3970) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22136013 = score(doc=3970,freq=60.0), product of:
            0.23183343 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05877307 = queryNorm
            0.95482403 = fieldWeight in 3970, product of:
              7.745967 = tf(freq=60.0), with freq of:
                60.0 = termFreq=60.0
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3970)
        0.056787092 = weight(_text_:library in 3970) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056787092 = score(doc=3970,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.15453665 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05877307 = queryNorm
            0.36746684 = fieldWeight in 3970, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3970)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Discover Digital Libraries: Theory and Practice is a book that integrates both research and practice concerning digital library development, use, preservation, and evaluation. The combination of current research and practical guidelines is a unique strength of this book. The authors bring in-depth expertise on different digital library issues and synthesize theoretical and practical perspectives relevant to researchers, practitioners, and students. The book presents a comprehensive overview of the different approaches and tools for digital library development, including discussions of the social and legal issues associated with digital libraries. Readers will find current research and the best practices of digital libraries, providing both US and international perspectives on the development of digital libraries and their components, including collection, digitization, metadata, interface design, sustainability, preservation, retrieval, and evaluation of digital libraries.
    Offers an overview of digital libraries and the conceptual and practical understanding of digital libraries Presents the lifecycle of digital library design, use, preservation and evaluation, including collection development, digitization of static and multimedia resources, metadata, digital library development and interface design, digital information searching, digital preservation, and digital library evaluation Synthesizes current research and the best practices of digital libraries, providing both US and international perspectives on the development of digital libraries Introduces new developments in the area of digital libraries, such as large-scale digital libraries, social media applications in digital libraries, multilingual digital libraries, digital curation, linked data, rapid capture, guidelines for the digitization of multimedia resources Highlights the impact, challenges, suggestions for overcoming these challenges, and trends of present and future development of digital libraries Offers a comprehensive bibliography for each chapter
    Content
    Introduction to digital libraries - Digital library initiatives and international projects - Collection development - Techniques and technologies for multimedia storage and retrieval - Digitization - Knowledge representation and organization - Digital Library Content Management Systems - Interface design and evaluation - Sustainability and preservation - User needs and information retrieval - Evaluation of digital libraries - Impact, challenges, and trends for the future
    LCSH
    Digital libraries
    Library materials / Digitization
    Subject
    Digital libraries
    Library materials / Digitization
  15. Parka, A.L.; Panchyshyn, R.S.: ¬The path to an RDA hybridized catalog : lessons from the Kent State University Libraries' RDA enrichment project (2016) 0.14
    0.1360716 = product of:
      0.2721432 = sum of:
        0.054431252 = weight(_text_:library in 2632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054431252 = score(doc=2632,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.15453665 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05877307 = queryNorm
            0.3522223 = fieldWeight in 2632, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2632)
        0.21771194 = sum of:
          0.16197136 = weight(_text_:project in 2632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.16197136 = score(doc=2632,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.24808002 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05877307 = queryNorm
              0.6528997 = fieldWeight in 2632, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2632)
          0.055740576 = weight(_text_:22 in 2632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.055740576 = score(doc=2632,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20581327 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05877307 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2632, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2632)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    This article describes in detail the library implementation of a Resource Description and Access (RDA) Enrichment project. The library "hybridized," or enriched legacy data from Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules bibliographic records by the addition of specific RDA elements. The project also cleaned up various other elements in the bibliographic data that were not directly RDA-related. There were over 28 million changes and edits made to these records, changes that would never have been made otherwise because the library lacked the resources to do them independently. The enrichment project made the bibliographic data consistent, and helped prepared the data for its eventual transition to a linked data environment.
    Date
    21. 1.2016 19:08:22
  16. Petric, K.; Petric, T.; Krisper, M.; Rajkovic, V.: User profiling on a pilot digital library with the final result of a new adaptive knowledge management solution (2011) 0.13
    0.13165838 = product of:
      0.1755445 = sum of:
        0.10500033 = weight(_text_:digital in 4560) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10500033 = score(doc=4560,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.23183343 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05877307 = queryNorm
            0.4529128 = fieldWeight in 4560, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4560)
        0.04665536 = weight(_text_:library in 4560) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04665536 = score(doc=4560,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.15453665 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05877307 = queryNorm
            0.30190483 = fieldWeight in 4560, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4560)
        0.023888817 = product of:
          0.047777634 = sum of:
            0.047777634 = weight(_text_:22 in 4560) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047777634 = score(doc=4560,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20581327 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05877307 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4560, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4560)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    In this article, several procedures (e.g., measurements, information retrieval analyses, power law, association rules, hierarchical clustering) are introduced which were made on a pilot digital library. Information retrievals of web users from 01/01/2003 to 01/01/2006 on the internal search engine of the pilot digital library have been analyzed. With the power law method of data processing, a constant information retrieval pattern has been established, stable over a longer period of time. After this, the data have been analyzed. On the basis of the accomplished measurements and analyses, a series of mental models of web users for global (educational) purposes have been developed (e.g., the metamodel of thought hierarchy of web users, the segmentation model of web users), and the users were profiled in four different groups (adventurers, observers, applicable, and know-alls). The article concludes with the construction of a new knowledge management solution called multidimensional rank thesaurus.
    Date
    13. 7.2011 14:47:22
  17. Valentino, M.L.: Integrating metadata creation into catalog workflow (2010) 0.13
    0.12921539 = product of:
      0.1722872 = sum of:
        0.07072563 = weight(_text_:digital in 4160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07072563 = score(doc=4160,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23183343 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05877307 = queryNorm
            0.30507088 = fieldWeight in 4160, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4160)
        0.031425897 = weight(_text_:library in 4160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031425897 = score(doc=4160,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15453665 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05877307 = queryNorm
            0.20335563 = fieldWeight in 4160, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4160)
        0.07013567 = product of:
          0.14027134 = sum of:
            0.14027134 = weight(_text_:project in 4160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14027134 = score(doc=4160,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.24808002 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05877307 = queryNorm
                0.5654278 = fieldWeight in 4160, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4160)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    The University of Oklahoma Libraries recently undertook a project designed to integrate digital library metadata creation into the workflow of the Cataloging Department. This article examines the conditions and factors that led to the project's genesis, the proposed and revised workflows that were developed, the staff training efforts that accompanied implementation of the project, and the results and benefits obtained through the project's implementation. The project presented several challenges but resulted in an improved workflow, greater use of Cataloging Department resources, and more accurate and useful metadata while increasing the Library's capacity to support digitization efforts in a timely fashion.
  18. Metadata and semantics research : 7th Research Conference, MTSR 2013 Thessaloniki, Greece, November 19-22, 2013. Proceedings (2013) 0.13
    0.12668408 = product of:
      0.16891211 = sum of:
        0.05001057 = weight(_text_:digital in 1155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05001057 = score(doc=1155,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.23183343 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05877307 = queryNorm
            0.21571769 = fieldWeight in 1155, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1155)
        0.022221465 = weight(_text_:library in 1155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022221465 = score(doc=1155,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15453665 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05877307 = queryNorm
            0.14379413 = fieldWeight in 1155, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1155)
        0.09668007 = sum of:
          0.057265528 = weight(_text_:project in 1155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.057265528 = score(doc=1155,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.24808002 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05877307 = queryNorm
              0.2308349 = fieldWeight in 1155, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1155)
          0.03941454 = weight(_text_:22 in 1155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03941454 = score(doc=1155,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.20581327 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05877307 = queryNorm
              0.19150631 = fieldWeight in 1155, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1155)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    The MTSR 2013 program and the contents of these proceedings show a rich diversity of research and practices, drawing on problems from metadata and semantically focused tools and technologies, linked data, cross-language semantics, ontologies, metadata models, and semantic system and metadata standards. The general session of the conference included 18 papers covering a broad spectrum of topics, proving the interdisciplinary field of metadata, and was divided into three main themes: platforms for research data sets, system architecture and data management; metadata and ontology validation, evaluation, mapping and interoperability; and content management. Metadata as a research topic is maturing, and the conference also supported the following five tracks: Metadata and Semantics for Open Repositories, Research Information Systems and Data Infrastructures; Metadata and Semantics for Cultural Collections and Applications; Metadata and Semantics for Agriculture, Food and Environment; Big Data and Digital Libraries in Health, Science and Technology; and European and National Projects, and Project Networking. Each track had a rich selection of papers, giving broader diversity to MTSR, and enabling deeper exploration of significant topics.
    All the papers underwent a thorough and rigorous peer-review process. The review and selection this year was highly competitive and only papers containing significant research results, innovative methods, or novel and best practices were accepted for publication. Only 29 of 89 submissions were accepted as full papers, representing 32.5% of the total number of submissions. Additional contributions covering noteworthy and important results in special tracks or project reports were accepted, totaling 42 accepted contributions. This year's conference included two outstanding keynote speakers. Dr. Stefan Gradmann, a professor arts department of KU Leuven (Belgium) and director of university library, addressed semantic research drawing from his work with Europeana. The title of his presentation was, "Towards a Semantic Research Library: Digital Humanities Research, Europeana and the Linked Data Paradigm". Dr. Michail Salampasis, associate professor from our conference host institution, the Department of Informatics of the Alexander TEI of Thessaloniki, presented new potential, intersecting search and linked data. The title of his talk was, "Rethinking the Search Experience: What Could Professional Search Systems Do Better?"
    Date
    17.12.2013 12:51:22
  19. Whaanga, H.; Bainbridge, D.; Anderson, M.; Scrivener, K.; Cader, P.; Roa, T.; Keegan, T.T.: He Matapihi Ma Mua, Mo Muri : the ethics, processes, and procedures associated with the digitization of indigenous knowledge - the Pei Jones collection (2015) 0.13
    0.12646909 = product of:
      0.16862546 = sum of:
        0.036688637 = product of:
          0.11006591 = sum of:
            0.11006591 = weight(_text_:objects in 2178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11006591 = score(doc=2178,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.31238306 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05877307 = queryNorm
                0.35234275 = fieldWeight in 2178, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2178)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.10500033 = weight(_text_:digital in 2178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10500033 = score(doc=2178,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.23183343 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05877307 = queryNorm
            0.4529128 = fieldWeight in 2178, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2178)
        0.026936483 = weight(_text_:library in 2178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026936483 = score(doc=2178,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15453665 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05877307 = queryNorm
            0.17430481 = fieldWeight in 2178, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2178)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    The digital era has transformed how people live their lives and interact with the world and knowledge systems around them. In Aotearoa/New Zealand a range of initiatives incorporating Indigenous knowledge have been implemented to collect, catalog, maintain, and organize digital objects. In this article, we report on the ethics, processes, and procedures associated with the digitization of the manuscripts, works, and collected taonga (treasures) of the late Dr. Pei Te Hurinui Jones-and describe how it was transformed into a digital library. It discusses the decision-making processes and the various roles and responsibilities of the researchers, family members, and institute in this process.
  20. Devaul, H.; Diekema, A.R.; Ostwald, J.: Computer-assisted assignment of educational standards using natural language processing (2011) 0.13
    0.12523732 = product of:
      0.16698308 = sum of:
        0.10500033 = weight(_text_:digital in 4199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10500033 = score(doc=4199,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.23183343 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05877307 = queryNorm
            0.4529128 = fieldWeight in 4199, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4199)
        0.03809394 = weight(_text_:library in 4199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03809394 = score(doc=4199,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15453665 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05877307 = queryNorm
            0.24650425 = fieldWeight in 4199, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4199)
        0.023888817 = product of:
          0.047777634 = sum of:
            0.047777634 = weight(_text_:22 in 4199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047777634 = score(doc=4199,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20581327 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05877307 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4199, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4199)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    Educational standards are a central focus of the current educational system in the United States, underpinning educational practice, curriculum design, teacher professional development, and high-stakes testing and assessment. Digital library users have requested that this information be accessible in association with digital learning resources to support teaching and learning as well as accountability requirements. Providing this information is complex because of the variability and number of standards documents in use at the national, state, and local level. This article describes a cataloging tool that aids catalogers in the assignment of standards metadata to digital library resources, using natural language processing techniques. The research explores whether the standards suggestor service would suggest the same standards as a human, whether relevant standards are ranked appropriately in the result set, and whether the relevance of the suggested assignments improve when, in addition to resource content, metadata is included in the query to the cataloging tool. The article also discusses how this service might streamline the cataloging workflow.
    Date
    22. 1.2011 14:25:32

Authors

Languages

  • e 1738
  • d 316
  • f 3
  • i 2
  • a 1
  • hu 1
  • pt 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 1782
  • el 244
  • m 158
  • s 60
  • x 28
  • r 14
  • n 8
  • b 6
  • i 3
  • ag 1
  • z 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications