Search (815 results, page 1 of 41)

0.11589796 = sum of:
  0.0874331 = product of:
    0.2622993 = sum of:
      0.2622993 = weight(_text_:objects in 5455) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.2622993 = score(doc=5455,freq=8.0), product of:
          0.31904724 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.060026903 = queryNorm
          0.82213306 = fieldWeight in 5455, product of:
            2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
              8.0 = termFreq=8.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5455)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.02846486 = product of:
    0.05692972 = sum of:
      0.05692972 = weight(_text_:22 in 5455) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05692972 = score(doc=5455,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21020399 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.060026903 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5455, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5455)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Although classification has been an important aspect of astronomy since stellar spectroscopy in the late nineteenth century, to date no comprehensive classification system has existed for all classes of objects in the universe. Here we present such a system, and lay out its foundational definitions and principles. The system consists of the "Three Kingdoms" of planets, stars and galaxies, eighteen families, and eighty-two classes of objects. Gravitation is the defining organizing principle for the families and classes, and the physical nature of the objects is the defining characteristic of the classes. The system should prove useful for both scientific and pedagogical purposes.

Date

21.11.2019 18:46:22

0.1031163 = sum of:
  0.06245222 = product of:
    0.18735665 = sum of:
      0.18735665 = weight(_text_:objects in 3277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.18735665 = score(doc=3277,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.31904724 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.060026903 = queryNorm
          0.58723795 = fieldWeight in 3277, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3277)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.040664084 = product of:
    0.08132817 = sum of:
      0.08132817 = weight(_text_:22 in 3277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08132817 = score(doc=3277,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21020399 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.060026903 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3277, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3277)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou

0.095338635 = product of:
  0.19067727 = sum of:
    0.19067727 = product of:
      0.5720318 = sum of:
        0.5720318 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.5720318 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.50890875 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.060026903 = queryNorm
            1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.

0.09420737 = product of:
  0.18841474 = sum of:
    0.18841474 = sum of:
      0.13148502 = weight(_text_:encyclopedia in 1438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.13148502 = score(doc=1438,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.3194549 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.321862 = idf(docFreq=586, maxDocs=44218)
            0.060026903 = queryNorm
          0.41159177 = fieldWeight in 1438, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.321862 = idf(docFreq=586, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1438)
      0.05692972 = weight(_text_:22 in 1438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05692972 = score(doc=1438,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21020399 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.060026903 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1438, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1438)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This paper discusses the classification of popular songs by studying how six online systems for different purposes (a service broadcaster, a library, a guide, an encyclopedia, a radio and an on demand music seller) describe and retrieve this kind of object. It investigates some aspects of faceted classification and proposes a reflection about the path towards a synthetic approach considering the concept of complexity and their implications. These discussions are based on the "That Music" prototype - an ontology-based system built specifically for popular songs.

Source

Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik

0.0902894 = sum of:
  0.06182454 = product of:
    0.18547362 = sum of:
      0.18547362 = weight(_text_:objects in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.18547362 = score(doc=4198,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.31904724 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.060026903 = queryNorm
          0.5813359 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.02846486 = product of:
    0.05692972 = sum of:
      0.05692972 = weight(_text_:22 in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05692972 = score(doc=4198,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21020399 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.060026903 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Large, data-rich organizations have tremendously large collections of digital objects to be "repurposed," to respond quickly and economically to publishing, marketing, and information needs. Some management typically assume that a content management system, or some other technique such as OWL and RDF, will automatically address the workflow and technical issues associated with this reuse. Four case studies show that the sources of some roadblocks to agile repurposing are as much managerial and organizational as they are technical in nature. The review concludes with suggestions on how digital object repurposing can be integrated given these organizations' structures.

Date

22. 1.2011 14:23:07

0.086742 = product of:
  0.173484 = sum of:
    0.173484 = sum of:
      0.13281992 = weight(_text_:encyclopedia in 1412) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.13281992 = score(doc=1412,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.3194549 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.321862 = idf(docFreq=586, maxDocs=44218)
            0.060026903 = queryNorm
          0.41577047 = fieldWeight in 1412, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            5.321862 = idf(docFreq=586, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1412)
      0.040664084 = weight(_text_:22 in 1412) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.040664084 = score(doc=1412,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21020399 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.060026903 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1412, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1412)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Scholarly domains have been analyzed using various tools and techniques to reveal complex genealogies of scholarship, authorship, citation and ontology, resulting in not only deeper knowledge of each area studied, but in a better developed set of methodologies for domain exploration in general. While domain analysis itself is being used frequently in LIS, there remain many areas against which domain analytical tools have not yet been applied. This is the case with encyclopedic collections of knowledge, such as that which is being developed as the Encyclopedia of Milwaukee (EMKE) within the history department at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. This descriptive study will analyze resources categorized under race and ethnicity from a comprehensive bibliography on the history of metropolitan Milwaukee that was designed to serve those who would research and write entries for the EMKE. Bibliometric and analytic techniques are employed to explore the intension and extension of the domain as it is developing.

Source

Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik

0.079448864 = product of:
  0.15889773 = sum of:
    0.15889773 = product of:
      0.47669318 = sum of:
        0.47669318 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.47669318 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.50890875 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.060026903 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja

0.078185044 = sum of:
  0.03122611 = product of:
    0.093678325 = sum of:
      0.093678325 = weight(_text_:objects in 951) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.093678325 = score(doc=951,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.31904724 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.060026903 = queryNorm
          0.29361898 = fieldWeight in 951, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=951)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.046958935 = product of:
    0.09391787 = sum of:
      0.09391787 = weight(_text_:encyclopedia in 951) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.09391787 = score(doc=951,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.3194549 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.321862 = idf(docFreq=586, maxDocs=44218)
            0.060026903 = queryNorm
          0.29399413 = fieldWeight in 951, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.321862 = idf(docFreq=586, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=951)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Wikipedia is a repository of information freely available to those with Internet access. Given its radical departure from previous encyclopedias, it is not surprising that it is controversial. Wikipedia is freely editable, leading to debates over accuracy and writing style. It has also included topics, especially in the area of popular culture, which some believe are not appropriate for a serious, comprehensive encyclopedia. In this article, I do not examine these arguments, but, rather, a different problem confronting Wikipedia. Through a case study of Cambodian history articles, I demonstrate how Wikipedia limits itself through a largely unconscious appropriation of the dominant discourse of representation surrounding its objects of inquiry. When article quality is examined, a distinct pattern emerges that can readily be matched to the dominant historiographical tradition of Cambodian history. As well as presenting this case study as a demonstration of the influence of dominant discursive narratives, I wish to contextualize this privileging of particular discourses within debates about the New World Information and Communication Order (NWICO) that emerged in the 1970s. I argue that the NWICO can be useful in our thinking about the relationship of information professionals to Wikipedia today.

0.07739091 = sum of:
  0.052992463 = product of:
    0.15897739 = sum of:
      0.15897739 = weight(_text_:objects in 2835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.15897739 = score(doc=2835,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.31904724 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.060026903 = queryNorm
          0.49828792 = fieldWeight in 2835, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2835)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.02439845 = product of:
    0.0487969 = sum of:
      0.0487969 = weight(_text_:22 in 2835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0487969 = score(doc=2835,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21020399 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.060026903 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2835, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2835)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to develop methodology to determine conceptual overlap between research areas. It investigates patterns of terminology usage in scientific abstracts as boundary objects between research specialties. Research specialties were determined by high-level classifications assigned by Thomson Reuters in their Essential Science Indicators file, which provided a strictly hierarchical classification of journals into 22 categories. Results from the query "network theory" were downloaded from the Web of Science. From this file, two top-level groups, economics and social sciences, were selected and topically analyzed to provide a baseline of similarity on which to run an informetric analysis. The Places & Spaces Map of Science (Klavans and Boyack 2007) was used to determine the proximity of disciplines to one another in order to select the two disciplines use in the analysis. Groups analyzed share common theories and goals; however, groups used different language to describe their research. It was found that 61% of term words were shared between the two groups.

0.07441725 = sum of:
  0.054085206 = product of:
    0.16225561 = sum of:
      0.16225561 = weight(_text_:objects in 143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.16225561 = score(doc=143,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.31904724 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.060026903 = queryNorm
          0.508563 = fieldWeight in 143, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=143)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.020332042 = product of:
    0.040664084 = sum of:
      0.040664084 = weight(_text_:22 in 143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.040664084 = score(doc=143,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21020399 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.060026903 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 143, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=143)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Documentary activities are informational operations of selection and representation of objects made from their features and predictable use. In order to make them more dynamic, these activities are carried out systemically, according to institutionally limited (in the sense of social institution) information projects. This organic approach leads to the constitution of information systems, or, more specifically, systems of documentary information, inasmuch as they refer to actions about documents as objects from which information is produced. Thus, systems of documentary information are called documentary systems. This article aims to list and systematize elements with the potential to a generalizing and categorical approach of documentary systems. We approach the systems according to: elements of reference (the documents and their information, the users, and the institutional context); constitutive elements (collection and references); structural elements (constituent units and the relation among them); modes of production (pre or post representation of the document); management aspects (flow of documents and of their information); and, finally, typology (management systems and information retrieval systems). Thus, documentary systems can be considered products due to operations involving objects institutionally limited for the production of collections (virtual or not) and their references, whose objective is the appropriation of information by the user.

Content

Beitrag einer Section "Selected Papers from the 1ST Brazilian Conference on Knowledge Organization And Representation, Faculdade de Ciência da Informação, Campus Universitário Darcy Ribeiro Brasília, DF Brasil, October 20-22, 2011" Vgl.: http://www.ergon-verlag.de/isko_ko/downloads/ko_39_2012_3_h.pdf.

0.07218141 = sum of:
  0.04371655 = product of:
    0.13114965 = sum of:
      0.13114965 = weight(_text_:objects in 4227) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.13114965 = score(doc=4227,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.31904724 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.060026903 = queryNorm
          0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 4227, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4227)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.02846486 = product of:
    0.05692972 = sum of:
      0.05692972 = weight(_text_:22 in 4227) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05692972 = score(doc=4227,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21020399 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.060026903 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4227, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4227)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Information processing and management. 46(2010) no.1, S.22-43

0.07218141 = sum of:
  0.04371655 = product of:
    0.13114965 = sum of:
      0.13114965 = weight(_text_:objects in 1437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.13114965 = score(doc=1437,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.31904724 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.060026903 = queryNorm
          0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 1437, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1437)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.02846486 = product of:
    0.05692972 = sum of:
      0.05692972 = weight(_text_:22 in 1437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05692972 = score(doc=1437,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21020399 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.060026903 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1437, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1437)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This paper describes to construct faceted ontologies for domain modeling. Building upon the faceted theory of S.R. Ranganathan (1967), the paper intends to address the faceted classification approach applied to build domain ontologies. As classificatory ontologies are employed to represent the relationships of entities and objects on the web, the faceted approach helps to analyze domain representation in an effective way for modeling. Based on this perspective, an ontology of the music domain has been analyzed that would serve as a case study.

Source

Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik

0.064492434 = sum of:
  0.04416039 = product of:
    0.13248116 = sum of:
      0.13248116 = weight(_text_:objects in 4195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.13248116 = score(doc=4195,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.31904724 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.060026903 = queryNorm
          0.41523993 = fieldWeight in 4195, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4195)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.020332042 = product of:
    0.040664084 = sum of:
      0.040664084 = weight(_text_:22 in 4195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.040664084 = score(doc=4195,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21020399 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.060026903 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4195, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4195)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Webcasting systems were developed to provide remote access in real-time to live events. Today, these systems have an additional requirement: to accommodate the "second life" of webcasts as archival information objects. Research to date has focused on facilitating the production and storage of webcasts as well as the development of more interactive and collaborative multimedia tools to support the event, but research has not examined how people interact with a webcasting system to access and use the contents of those archived events. Using an experimental design, this study examined how 16 typical users interact with a webcasting system to respond to a set of information tasks: selecting a webcast, searching for specific information, and making a gist of a webcast. Using several data sources that included user actions, user perceptions, and user explanations of their actions and decisions, the study also examined the strategies employed to complete the tasks. The results revealed distinctive system-use patterns for each task and provided insights into the types of tools needed to make webcasting systems better suited for also using the webcasts as information objects.

Date

22. 1.2011 14:16:14

0.06186978 = sum of:
  0.03747133 = product of:
    0.11241399 = sum of:
      0.11241399 = weight(_text_:objects in 5583) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11241399 = score(doc=5583,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.31904724 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.060026903 = queryNorm
          0.35234275 = fieldWeight in 5583, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5583)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.02439845 = product of:
    0.0487969 = sum of:
      0.0487969 = weight(_text_:22 in 5583) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0487969 = score(doc=5583,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21020399 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.060026903 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5583, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5583)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

As a cultural institution, the public library is charged with providing resources and services that fit the needs of a particular community and, if space and budgets allow, of serving as a resource and repository of the community's past. To fulfill its mission to the public, the library must attract that public by offering materials and providing opportunities for them to pursue their unique and varied interests and discover new things. By engaging individuals in the identification and preservation of their own personal, digital objects, it may be possible to increase awareness in, and commitment to, community repositories that reflect a community's diversity and that will serve all. A user education program that focuses on the importance of identifying and preserving the information and artifacts that are important, that addresses the technical aspects of preservation, and that creates awareness of the benefits and challenges associated with sharing personal information can result in a community repository that ultimately has more value for both the individual and the community.

Date

11.12.2019 17:47:22

0.05997996 = sum of:
  0.03122611 = product of:
    0.093678325 = sum of:
      0.093678325 = weight(_text_:objects in 1451) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.093678325 = score(doc=1451,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.31904724 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.060026903 = queryNorm
          0.29361898 = fieldWeight in 1451, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1451)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.028753849 = product of:
    0.057507697 = sum of:
      0.057507697 = weight(_text_:22 in 1451) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.057507697 = score(doc=1451,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.21020399 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.060026903 = queryNorm
          0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 1451, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1451)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Previous studies of user-generated vocabularies (e.g., Golder & Huberman, 2006; Munk & Mork, 2007b; Yoon, 2009) have proposed that a primary source of tag agreement across users is due to wide-spread use of tags at the basic level of abstraction. However, an investigation of levels of abstraction in user-generated tagging vocabularies did not support this notion. This study analyzed approximately 8000 tags generated by 40 subjects. Analysis of 7617 tags assigned to 36 online resources representing four content categories (TOOL, FRUIT, CLOTHING, VEHICLE) and three resource genres (news article, blog, ecommerce) did not find statistically significant preferences in the assignment of tags at the superordinate, subordinate or basic levels of abstraction. Within the framework of Heidegger's (1953/1996) notion of handiness , observed variations in the preferred level of abstraction are both natural and phenomenological in that perception and understanding -- and thus the meaning of "things" -- arise out of the individual's contextualized experiences of engaging with objects. Operationalization of superordinate, subordinate and basic levels of abstraction using Heidegger's notion of handiness may be able to account for differences in the everyday experiences and activities of taggers, thereby leading to a better understanding of user-generated tagging vocabularies.

Date

5. 9.2014 16:22:27

Source

Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik

0.056934685 = product of:
  0.11386937 = sum of:
    0.11386937 = product of:
      0.22773874 = sum of:
        0.22773874 = weight(_text_:encyclopedia in 3181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22773874 = score(doc=3181,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.3194549 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.321862 = idf(docFreq=586, maxDocs=44218)
              0.060026903 = queryNorm
            0.7128979 = fieldWeight in 3181, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              5.321862 = idf(docFreq=586, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3181)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This is an online, open access encyclopedia of knowledge organization hosted by ISKO and produced by ISKO Scientific Advisory Council. It will contain entries about concepts, disciplines, organizations, systems, standards, and theories etc. including important domain specific systems. The encyclopedia is peer reviewed, all articles are signed by author(s), dated and versioned (new versions may be distinguished as, for example, Version 1.1 for minor changes of version 1 and Version 2 for major changes). We will try to get articles by the best experts in the subject of each article and to maintain a high scholarly standard. The first accepted version of each article will also be published in a new section of Knowledge Organization: Reviews of concepts in knowledge organization.

0.055614203 = product of:
  0.11122841 = sum of:
    0.11122841 = product of:
      0.33368522 = sum of:
        0.33368522 = weight(_text_:3a in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.33368522 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.50890875 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.060026903 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

Rez. in: Philosophisch-ethische Rezensionen vom 09.11.2019 (Jürgen Czogalla), Unter: https://philosophisch-ethische-rezensionen.de/rezension/Goedert1.html. In: B.I.T. online 23(2020) H.3, S.345-347 (W. Sühl-Strohmenger) [Unter: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.b-i-t-online.de%2Fheft%2F2020-03-rezensionen.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0iY3f_zNcvEjeZ6inHVnOK]. In: Open Password Nr. 805 vom 14.08.2020 (H.-C. Hobohm) [Unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzE0MywiOGI3NjZkZmNkZjQ1IiwwLDAsMTMxLDFd].

0.052501686 = product of:
  0.10500337 = sum of:
    0.10500337 = product of:
      0.21000674 = sum of:
        0.21000674 = weight(_text_:encyclopedia in 3633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21000674 = score(doc=3633,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.3194549 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.321862 = idf(docFreq=586, maxDocs=44218)
              0.060026903 = queryNorm
            0.6573909 = fieldWeight in 3633, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              5.321862 = idf(docFreq=586, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3633)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to discuss the second edition of the Encyclopaedia Judaica (2007) within its broader historical context of the production of encyclopedias in the twentieth and the twenty-first centuries. The paper contrasts the 2007 edition of the Encyclopaedia Judaica to the Jewish Encyclopedia published between 1901 and 1905, and to the first edition of the Encyclopaedia Judaica published in 1972; then contrasts the 2007 edition of the Encyclopaedia Judaica to Wikipedia and to other projects of online encyclopedias. Design/methodology/approach - The paper provides a personal reflective review of the sources in question. Findings - That Encyclopaedia Judaica in its latest edition does not adequately replace the original first edition in terms of depth of scholarly work. It is considered that the model offered by Wikipedia could work well for the Encyclopaedia Judaica, allowing it to retain the core of the expert knowledge, and at the same time channel the energy of volunteer editors which has made Wikipedia such a success. Practical implications - The paper is of interest to those with an interest in encyclopedia design or Jewish studies. Originality/value - This paper provides a unique reflection on the latest edition of the encyclopedia and considers future models for its publication based on traditional and non-traditional methods.

Object

Encyclopedia Judaica

0.051593944 = sum of:
  0.03532831 = product of:
    0.105984926 = sum of:
      0.105984926 = weight(_text_:objects in 1444) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.105984926 = score(doc=1444,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.31904724 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.060026903 = queryNorm
          0.33219194 = fieldWeight in 1444, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1444)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.016265634 = product of:
    0.03253127 = sum of:
      0.03253127 = weight(_text_:22 in 1444) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03253127 = score(doc=1444,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21020399 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.060026903 = queryNorm
          0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1444, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1444)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Acquiring knowledge in any field involves information retrieval, i.e. searching the available documents to identify answers to the queries concerning the selected objects. Knowing the keywords which are names of the objects will enable situating the user's query in the information space organized as a thesaurus or faceted classification. Objectives: Identification the areas in the information space which correspond to gaps in the user's personal knowledge or in the domain knowledge might become useful in theory or practice. The aim of this paper is to present a realistic information-space model of a self-authored full-text document on information culture, indexed by the author of this article. Methodology: Having established the relations between the terms, particular modules (sets of terms connected by relations used in facet classification) are situated on a plain, similarly to a communication map. Conclusions drawn from the "journey" on the map, which is a visualization of the knowledge contained in the analysed document, are the crucial part of this paper. Results: The direct result of the research is the created model of information space visualization of a given document (book, article, website). The proposed procedure can practically be used as a new form of representation in order to map the contents of academic books and articles, beside the traditional index form, especially as an e-book auxiliary tool. In teaching, visualization of the information space of a document can be used to help students understand the issues of: classification, categorization and representation of new knowledge emerging in human mind.

Source

Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik

0.05155815 = sum of:
  0.03122611 = product of:
    0.093678325 = sum of:
      0.093678325 = weight(_text_:objects in 3733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.093678325 = score(doc=3733,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.31904724 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.060026903 = queryNorm
          0.29361898 = fieldWeight in 3733, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3733)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.020332042 = product of:
    0.040664084 = sum of:
      0.040664084 = weight(_text_:22 in 3733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.040664084 = score(doc=3733,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21020399 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.060026903 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3733, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3733)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The focus of the present research has been the development and the application to Virtual Archaeology of a Web-Based framework for Learning Objects indexing and retrieval. The paper presents the main outcomes of a experimentation carried out by an interdisciplinary group of Federico II University of Naples. Our equipe is composed by researchers both in ICT and in Humanities disciplines, in particular in the domain of Virtual Archaeology and Cultural Heritage Informatics in order to develop specific ICT methodological approaches to Virtual Archaeology. The methodological background is the progressive diffusion of Web 2.0 technologies and the attempt to analyze their impact and perspectives in the Cultural Heritage field. In particular, we approached the specific requirements of the so called Learning 2.0, and the possibility to improve the automation of modular courseware generation in Virtual Archaeology Didactics. The developed framework was called SEMANTICA, and it was applied to Virtual Archaeology Domain Ontologies in order to generate a didactic course in a semi-automated way. The main results of this test and the first students feedback on the course fruition will be presented and discussed..

Source

Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly