Search (890 results, page 1 of 45)

0.292189 = sum of:
  0.030931344 = product of:
    0.09279403 = sum of:
      0.09279403 = weight(_text_:objects in 3733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.09279403 = score(doc=3733,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.31603554 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.059460267 = queryNorm
          0.29361898 = fieldWeight in 3733, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3733)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.26125765 = sum of:
    0.22097743 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 3733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.22097743 = score(doc=3733,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.3448537 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
          0.059460267 = queryNorm
        0.640786 = fieldWeight in 3733, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3733)
    0.040280227 = weight(_text_:22 in 3733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.040280227 = score(doc=3733,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20821972 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.059460267 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3733, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3733)

Abstract

The focus of the present research has been the development and the application to Virtual Archaeology of a Web-Based framework for Learning Objects indexing and retrieval. The paper presents the main outcomes of a experimentation carried out by an interdisciplinary group of Federico II University of Naples. Our equipe is composed by researchers both in ICT and in Humanities disciplines, in particular in the domain of Virtual Archaeology and Cultural Heritage Informatics in order to develop specific ICT methodological approaches to Virtual Archaeology. The methodological background is the progressive diffusion of Web 2.0 technologies and the attempt to analyze their impact and perspectives in the Cultural Heritage field. In particular, we approached the specific requirements of the so called Learning 2.0, and the possibility to improve the automation of modular courseware generation in Virtual Archaeology Didactics. The developed framework was called SEMANTICA, and it was applied to Virtual Archaeology Domain Ontologies in order to generate a didactic course in a semi-automated way. The main results of this test and the first students feedback on the course fruition will be presented and discussed..

Object

ARCHAEOLOGY 2.0

Source

Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly

0.13757442 = product of:
  0.27514884 = sum of:
    0.27514884 = sum of:
      0.21875651 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 1517) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.21875651 = score(doc=1517,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.3448537 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
            0.059460267 = queryNorm
          0.6343458 = fieldWeight in 1517, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1517)
      0.056392316 = weight(_text_:22 in 1517) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.056392316 = score(doc=1517,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20821972 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.059460267 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1517, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1517)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

RSWK

Soziale Software / World Wide Web 2.0 / Kongress / Düsseldorf <2012>

Subject

Soziale Software / World Wide Web 2.0 / Kongress / Düsseldorf <2012>

0.13304237 = product of:
  0.26608473 = sum of:
    0.26608473 = sum of:
      0.23386054 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 4202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.23386054 = score(doc=4202,freq=14.0), product of:
          0.3448537 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
            0.059460267 = queryNorm
          0.6781442 = fieldWeight in 4202, product of:
            3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
              14.0 = termFreq=14.0
            5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4202)
      0.032224182 = weight(_text_:22 in 4202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.032224182 = score(doc=4202,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20821972 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.059460267 = queryNorm
          0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 4202, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4202)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Purpose - This paper is the final one in a series which has tried to give an overview of so-called transformational areas of digital library technology. The aim has been to assess how much real transformation these applications can bring about, in terms of creating genuine user benefit and also changing everyday library practice. Design/methodology/approach - The paper provides a summary of some of the legal and ethical issues associated with web 2.0 applications in libraries, associated with a brief retrospective view of some relevant literature. Findings - Although web 2.0 innovations have had a massive impact on the larger World Wide Web, the practical impact on library service delivery has been limited to date. What probably can be termed transformational in the effect of web 2.0 developments on library and information work is their effect on some underlying principles of professional practice. Research limitations/implications - The legal and ethical challenges of incorporating web 2.0 platforms into mainstream institutional service delivery need to be subject to further research, so that the risks associated with these innovations are better understood at the strategic and policy-making level. Practical implications - This paper makes some recommendations about new principles of library and information practice which will help practitioners make better sense of these innovations in their overall information environment. Social implications - The paper puts in context some of the more problematic social impacts of web 2.0 innovations, without denying the undeniable positive contribution of social networking to the sphere of human interactivity. Originality/value - This paper raises some cautionary points about web 2.0 applications without adopting a precautionary approach of total prohibition. However, none of the suggestions or analysis in this piece should be considered to constitute legal advice. If such advice is required, the reader should consult appropriate legal professionals.

Date

22. 1.2011 17:54:04

0.12064598 = sum of:
  0.043303877 = product of:
    0.12991163 = sum of:
      0.12991163 = weight(_text_:objects in 4836) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.12991163 = score(doc=4836,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.31603554 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.059460267 = queryNorm
          0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 4836, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4836)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.0773421 = product of:
    0.1546842 = sum of:
      0.1546842 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 4836) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.1546842 = score(doc=4836,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.3448537 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
            0.059460267 = queryNorm
          0.4485502 = fieldWeight in 4836, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4836)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

We present the DOCMA method (DOCument and Model for Action) focused to Socio-Semantic web applications in large communities of interest. DOCMA is dedicated to end-users without any knowledge in Information Science. Community Members can elicit, structure and index shared business items emerging from their inquiry (such as projects, actors, products, geographically situated objects of interest.). We apply DOCMA to an experiment in the field of Sustainable Development: the Cartodd-Map21 collaborative Web portal.

0.11480391 = sum of:
  0.086607754 = product of:
    0.25982326 = sum of:
      0.25982326 = weight(_text_:objects in 5455) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.25982326 = score(doc=5455,freq=8.0), product of:
          0.31603554 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.059460267 = queryNorm
          0.82213306 = fieldWeight in 5455, product of:
            2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
              8.0 = termFreq=8.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5455)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.028196158 = product of:
    0.056392316 = sum of:
      0.056392316 = weight(_text_:22 in 5455) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.056392316 = score(doc=5455,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20821972 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.059460267 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5455, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5455)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Although classification has been an important aspect of astronomy since stellar spectroscopy in the late nineteenth century, to date no comprehensive classification system has existed for all classes of objects in the universe. Here we present such a system, and lay out its foundational definitions and principles. The system consists of the "Three Kingdoms" of planets, stars and galaxies, eighteen families, and eighty-two classes of objects. Gravitation is the defining organizing principle for the families and classes, and the physical nature of the objects is the defining characteristic of the classes. The system should prove useful for both scientific and pedagogical purposes.

Date

21.11.2019 18:46:22

0.109378256 = product of:
  0.21875651 = sum of:
    0.21875651 = product of:
      0.43751302 = sum of:
        0.43751302 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 4848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.43751302 = score(doc=4848,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.3448537 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.059460267 = queryNorm
            1.2686917 = fieldWeight in 4848, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4848)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

In diesem Artikel geht es darum, was Web 2.0 für die Wissenschaft bedeutet und welchen Nutzen Web 2.0-Dienste für Wissenschaftler haben. Im Rahmen dieses Themas wird eine Studie vorgestellt, bei der Wissenschaftler unterschiedlicher Fachbereiche unter anderem gefragt wurden, welche Web 2.0-Dienste sie kennen und warum sie Web 2.0-Dienste nutzen. Nach einer kurzen Einleitung zu Web 2.0 und dem bisherigen Forschungsstand folgen die Ergebnisse der Studie, die zeigen werden, dass Web 2.0-Dienste bekannt sind und für private Zwecke und zur Unterhaltung genutzt werden, sie sich allerdings noch nicht als Werkzeuge für die Wissenschaft etabliert haben.

Object

Web 2.0

0.10536158 = sum of:
  0.04285973 = product of:
    0.12857918 = sum of:
      0.12857918 = weight(_text_:objects in 2354) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.12857918 = score(doc=2354,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.31603554 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.059460267 = queryNorm
          0.4068504 = fieldWeight in 2354, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2354)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.062501855 = product of:
    0.12500371 = sum of:
      0.12500371 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 2354) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.12500371 = score(doc=2354,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.3448537 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
            0.059460267 = queryNorm
          0.36248332 = fieldWeight in 2354, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2354)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

In Digital Methods, Richard Rogers proposes a methodological outlook for social and cultural scholarly research on the Web that seeks to move Internet research beyond the study of online culture. It is not a toolkit for Internet research, or operating instructions for a software package; it deals with broader questions. How can we study social media to learn something about society rather than about social media use? How can hyperlinks reveal not just the value of a Web site but the politics of association? Rogers proposes repurposing Web-native techniques for research into cultural change and societal conditions. We can learn to reapply such "methods of the medium" as crawling and crowd sourcing, PageRank and similar algorithms, tag clouds and other visualizations; we can learn how they handle hits, likes, tags, date stamps, and other Web-native objects. By "thinking along" with devices and the objects they handle, digital research methods can follow the evolving methods of the medium. Rogers uses this new methodological outlook to examine the findings of inquiries into 9/11 search results, the recognition of climate change skeptics by climate-change-related Web sites, the events surrounding the Srebrenica massacre according to Dutch, Serbian, Bosnian, and Croatian Wikipedias, presidential candidates' social media "friends," and the censorship of the Iranian Web. With Digital Methods, Rogers introduces a new vision and method for Internet research and at the same time applies them to the Web's objects of study, from tiny particles (hyperlinks) to large masses (social media).

RSWK

Internet / Recherche / World Wide Web 2.0

Subject

Internet / Recherche / World Wide Web 2.0

0.102142915 = sum of:
  0.06186269 = product of:
    0.18558806 = sum of:
      0.18558806 = weight(_text_:objects in 3277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.18558806 = score(doc=3277,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.31603554 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.059460267 = queryNorm
          0.58723795 = fieldWeight in 3277, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3277)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.040280227 = product of:
    0.08056045 = sum of:
      0.08056045 = weight(_text_:22 in 3277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08056045 = score(doc=3277,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20821972 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.059460267 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3277, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3277)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou

0.09826743 = product of:
  0.19653486 = sum of:
    0.19653486 = sum of:
      0.15625463 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 2934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.15625463 = score(doc=2934,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.3448537 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
            0.059460267 = queryNorm
          0.45310414 = fieldWeight in 2934, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2934)
      0.040280227 = weight(_text_:22 in 2934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.040280227 = score(doc=2934,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20821972 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.059460267 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2934, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2934)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Tags generated by domain experts reaching a consensus under social influence reflect the core concepts of the tagged resource. Such tags can act as navigational cues that enable users to discover meaningful and relevant information in a Web 2.0 environment. This is particularly critical for nonexperts for understanding formal academic or scientific resources, also known as hard content. The goal of this study was to develop a novel one-bit comparison (OBC) metric and to assess in what circumstances a set of tags describing a hard-content resource is mature and representative. We compared OBC with the conventional Shannon entropy approach to determine performance when distinguishing tags generated by domain experts and nonexperts in the early and later stages under social influence. The results indicated that OBC can accurately distinguish mature tags generated by a strong expert consensus from other tags, and outperform Shannon entropy. The findings support tag-based learning, and provide insights and tools for the design of applications involving tags, such as tag recommendation and tag-based organization.

Date

7. 5.2016 20:13:22

0.09826743 = product of:
  0.19653486 = sum of:
    0.19653486 = sum of:
      0.15625463 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 3343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.15625463 = score(doc=3343,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.3448537 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
            0.059460267 = queryNorm
          0.45310414 = fieldWeight in 3343, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3343)
      0.040280227 = weight(_text_:22 in 3343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.040280227 = score(doc=3343,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20821972 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.059460267 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3343, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3343)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

16.11.2017 13:04:22

Object

Web 2.0

0.094438665 = product of:
  0.18887733 = sum of:
    0.18887733 = product of:
      0.566632 = sum of:
        0.566632 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.566632 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.5041048 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.059460267 = queryNorm
            1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.

0.09046136 = product of:
  0.18092272 = sum of:
    0.18092272 = sum of:
      0.13258645 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 1445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.13258645 = score(doc=1445,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.3448537 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
            0.059460267 = queryNorm
          0.3844716 = fieldWeight in 1445, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1445)
      0.04833627 = weight(_text_:22 in 1445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04833627 = score(doc=1445,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20821972 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.059460267 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1445, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1445)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Recent approaches to KO have explored the notion of intertextuality and considered ways in which such abstract concepts derived from literary theory might form the foundation for the design of novel and rich information retrieval systems. In this paper, the notion of intertextuality is examined, and its use by knowledge organization researchers explored. Gerard Genette's work in particular has been used with some success to map out the possibilities offered by applying the concept of intertextuality to the design of information retrieval systems. The paper will examine some KO systems which reveal the traces of intertextual poetics in their design, including the FRBR model which in its mapping of intertextuality, articulates some of Genette's categories while stopping short of actualising the more subjective and interpretative categories. The paper concludes with speculation about whether and how these categories might be accommodated in a Web 2.0 interactive digital bibliosphere.

Source

Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik

0.09046136 = product of:
  0.18092272 = sum of:
    0.18092272 = sum of:
      0.13258645 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 4072) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.13258645 = score(doc=4072,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.3448537 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
            0.059460267 = queryNorm
          0.3844716 = fieldWeight in 4072, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4072)
      0.04833627 = weight(_text_:22 in 4072) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04833627 = score(doc=4072,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20821972 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.059460267 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4072, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4072)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 1.2018 17:33:05

0.0894371 = sum of:
  0.061240938 = product of:
    0.18372281 = sum of:
      0.18372281 = weight(_text_:objects in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.18372281 = score(doc=4198,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.31603554 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.059460267 = queryNorm
          0.5813359 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.028196158 = product of:
    0.056392316 = sum of:
      0.056392316 = weight(_text_:22 in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.056392316 = score(doc=4198,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20821972 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.059460267 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Large, data-rich organizations have tremendously large collections of digital objects to be "repurposed," to respond quickly and economically to publishing, marketing, and information needs. Some management typically assume that a content management system, or some other technique such as OWL and RDF, will automatically address the workflow and technical issues associated with this reuse. Four case studies show that the sources of some roadblocks to agile repurposing are as much managerial and organizational as they are technical in nature. The review concludes with suggestions on how digital object repurposing can be integrated given these organizations' structures.

Date

22. 1.2011 14:23:07

0.082866535 = product of:
  0.16573307 = sum of:
    0.16573307 = product of:
      0.33146614 = sum of:
        0.33146614 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 4076) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.33146614 = score(doc=4076,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.3448537 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.059460267 = queryNorm
            0.961179 = fieldWeight in 4076, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4076)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Unter Bibliothek 2.0 verstehen die Herausgeber eine Einrichtung, die die Prinzipien des Web 2.0 wie Offenheit, Wiederverwendung (ReUse), Kollaboration und Interaktion in der Gesamtorganisation anwendet. Bibliotheken erweitern Serviceangebote und Arbeitsabläufe um die Möglichkeiten der Web 2.0-Technologien. Dies verändert Berufsbild und Selbstverständnis der Bibliothekare. Der Sammelband bietet einen kompletten Überblick zum Thema Bibliothek 2.0 und den aktuellen Stand der Entwicklungen aus technologischer, soziologischer, informationstheoretischer sowie praxisorientierter Sicht.

LCSH

Web 2.0

RSWK

Bibliothek / World Wide Web 2.0 / Aufsatzsammlung

Subject

Bibliothek / World Wide Web 2.0 / Aufsatzsammlung
Web 2.0

0.081192285 = product of:
  0.16238457 = sum of:
    0.16238457 = product of:
      0.32476914 = sum of:
        0.32476914 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 4766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.32476914 = score(doc=4766,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.3448537 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.059460267 = queryNorm
            0.9417592 = fieldWeight in 4766, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4766)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Is Web 2.0 more than a buzzword? In recent years, technologists and others have heatedly debated this question, even in Wikipedia, itself an example of Web 2.0. From the perspective of the present study, Web 2.0 may indeed be a buzzword, but more substantially it is also an example of an organizing vision that drives a community's discourse about certain new Information Technology (IT), serving to advance the technology's adoption and diffusion. Every organizing vision has a career that reflects its construction over time, and in the present study we examine Web 2.0's career as captured in its Wikipedia entry over a 5-year period, finding that it falls into three distinct periods termed Germination, Growth, and Maturation. The findings reveal how Wikipedia, as a discourse vehicle, treats new IT and its many buzzwords, and more broadly captures the careers of their organizing visions. Too, they further our understanding of Wikipedia as a new encyclopedic form, providing novel insights into its uses, its community of contributors, and their editing activities, as well as the dynamics of article construction.

Object

Web 2.0

0.07919031 = sum of:
  0.034994822 = product of:
    0.10498446 = sum of:
      0.10498446 = weight(_text_:objects in 5068) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.10498446 = score(doc=5068,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.31603554 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.059460267 = queryNorm
          0.33219194 = fieldWeight in 5068, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5068)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.044195484 = product of:
    0.08839097 = sum of:
      0.08839097 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 5068) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08839097 = score(doc=5068,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.3448537 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
            0.059460267 = queryNorm
          0.2563144 = fieldWeight in 5068, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5068)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This paper presents a new theory of metadata enriching and filtering. The theory emerged from a rigorous grounded theory data analysis of 57 in-depth interviews with metadata experts, library and information science researchers, librarians as well as academic library users (G. Alemu, A Theory of Digital Library Metadata: The Emergence of Enriching and Filtering, University of Portsmouth PhD thesis, Portsmouth, 2014). Partly due to the novelty of Web 2.0 approaches and mainly due to the absence of foundational theories to underpin socially constructed metadata approaches, this research adapted a social constructivist philosophical approach and a constructivist grounded theory method (K.?Charmaz, Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis, SAGE Publications, London, 2006). The theory espouses the importance of enriching information objects with descriptions pertaining to the about-ness of information objects. Such richness and diversity of descriptions, it is argued, could chiefly be achieved by involving users in the metadata creation process. The theory includes four overarching metadata principles - metadata enriching, linking, openness and filtering. The theory proposes a mixed metadata approach where metadata experts provide the requisite basic descriptive metadata, structure and interoperability (a priori metadata) while users continually enrich it with their own interpretations (post-hoc metadata). Enriched metadata is inter- and cross-linked (the principle of linking), made openly accessible (the principle of openness) and presented (the principle of filtering) according to user needs. It is argued that enriched, interlinked and open metadata effectively rises and scales to the challenges presented by the growing digital collections and changing user expectations. This metadata approach allows users to pro-actively engage in co-creating metadata, hence enhancing the findability, discoverability and subsequent usage of information resources. This paper concludes by indicating the current challenges and opportunities to implement the theory of metadata enriching and filtering.

0.07869889 = product of:
  0.15739778 = sum of:
    0.15739778 = product of:
      0.47219333 = sum of:
        0.47219333 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.47219333 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.5041048 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.059460267 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja

0.07812732 = product of:
  0.15625463 = sum of:
    0.15625463 = product of:
      0.31250927 = sum of:
        0.31250927 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 4080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.31250927 = score(doc=4080,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.3448537 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.059460267 = queryNorm
            0.9062083 = fieldWeight in 4080, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4080)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Das Web 2.0 hat einen Paradigmenwechsel im Umgang mit Informationen und damit eng verbunden im Wissenserwerb eingeleitet. Theoretisch gesehen hat jeder offenen Zugang zu vielfältigen Informationen und kann gleichzeitig selbst Inhalte beisteuern - z.B. in Sozialen Netzwerken, in Weblogs oder Wikis - und Websites oder andere Dokumente (Videos, Slideshows o.ä.) veröffentlichen und mit anderen Nutzern teilen. Dieser Demokratisierungsprozess von Wissensproduktion, -kommunikation und -erwerb ist allerdings nicht frei von Kontroversen. Das verstärkte Nebeneinander von sachlich richtiger und relevanter Information einerseits und Belanglosigkeiten andererseits ruft auch Gegner auf den Plan. Sie sprechen von einem Information Overkill und befürchten den Niedergang der klassischen Bildung. Führen freie Wissenszugänge im Netz tatsächlich zu weniger Bildung? Was macht eine Website zu einer zuverlässigen und vertrauenswürdigen Quelle? Wie können aus der Fülle von Webressourcen die qualitativ hochwertigen herausgefiltert werden? Welchen Beitrag kann dabei Social Software leisten? Welches sind die Konstituenten einer Informationskompetenz 2.0, über die User verfügen sollten, um mit vorgefundenen Ressourcen adäquat umgehen zu können? Und inwiefern sind Bibliotheken - die sich ja zunehmend als Teaching Libraries verstehen - hier gefordert? Auf diese Fragen versucht das vorliegende Buch Antworten zu geben. Der Fokus liegt auf dem Umgang mit Wissensressourcen im Web 2.0, wobei ebenso theoretische wie praktische Implikationen berücksichtigt und ausgewählte Evaluierungsansätze hinsichtlich ihrer praktischen Anwendbarkeit für die User diskutiert werden.

Object

Web 2.0

RSWK

World Wide Web 2.0 / Information Retrieval / Informationskompetenz

Series

Web 2.0

Subject

World Wide Web 2.0 / Information Retrieval / Informationskompetenz

0.07812732 = product of:
  0.15625463 = sum of:
    0.15625463 = product of:
      0.31250927 = sum of:
        0.31250927 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 5162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.31250927 = score(doc=5162,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.3448537 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.059460267 = queryNorm
            0.9062083 = fieldWeight in 5162, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5162)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Object

BIBFRAME 2.0