Search (1509 results, page 1 of 76)

0.16860127 = product of:
  0.4215032 = sum of:
    0.36395526 = weight(_text_:22nd in 4652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.36395526 = score(doc=4652,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.6234299 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07079189 = queryNorm
        0.583795 = fieldWeight in 4652, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4652)
    0.05754794 = weight(_text_:22 in 4652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05754794 = score(doc=4652,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24790114 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07079189 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4652, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4652)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Date

21.12.2018 18:22:12

Footnote

Introduction und Rez. in: Knowledge Organization 45(2018) no.8, S.712-714. u.d.T. "Satija, M. P. 2018: "The 22nd edition (2018) of the Sears List of Subject Headings: A brief introduction." (DOI:10.5771/0943-7444-2018-8-712).

0.15059131 = product of:
  0.37647828 = sum of:
    0.30933902 = weight(_text_:objects in 5455) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.30933902 = score(doc=5455,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.37626395 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07079189 = queryNorm
        0.82213306 = fieldWeight in 5455, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5455)
    0.06713927 = weight(_text_:22 in 5455) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06713927 = score(doc=5455,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24790114 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07079189 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5455, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5455)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Abstract

Although classification has been an important aspect of astronomy since stellar spectroscopy in the late nineteenth century, to date no comprehensive classification system has existed for all classes of objects in the universe. Here we present such a system, and lay out its foundational definitions and principles. The system consists of the "Three Kingdoms" of planets, stars and galaxies, eighteen families, and eighty-two classes of objects. Gravitation is the defining organizing principle for the families and classes, and the physical nature of the objects is the defining characteristic of the classes. The system should prove useful for both scientific and pedagogical purposes.

Date

21.11.2019 18:46:22

0.13492355 = product of:
  0.6746177 = sum of:
    0.6746177 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.6746177 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.6001744 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07079189 = queryNorm
        1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Content

Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.

0.12674789 = product of:
  0.3168697 = sum of:
    0.22095647 = weight(_text_:objects in 3277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.22095647 = score(doc=3277,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.37626395 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07079189 = queryNorm
        0.58723795 = fieldWeight in 3277, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3277)
    0.09591324 = weight(_text_:22 in 3277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09591324 = score(doc=3277,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24790114 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07079189 = queryNorm
        0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3277, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3277)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Source

Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou

0.11435001 = product of:
  0.28587502 = sum of:
    0.21873574 = weight(_text_:objects in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.21873574 = score(doc=4198,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.37626395 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07079189 = queryNorm
        0.5813359 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
    0.06713927 = weight(_text_:22 in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06713927 = score(doc=4198,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24790114 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07079189 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Abstract

Large, data-rich organizations have tremendously large collections of digital objects to be "repurposed," to respond quickly and economically to publishing, marketing, and information needs. Some management typically assume that a content management system, or some other technique such as OWL and RDF, will automatically address the workflow and technical issues associated with this reuse. Four case studies show that the sources of some roadblocks to agile repurposing are as much managerial and organizational as they are technical in nature. The review concludes with suggestions on how digital object repurposing can be integrated given these organizations' structures.

Date

22. 1.2011 14:23:07

0.112436295 = product of:
  0.5621815 = sum of:
    0.5621815 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.5621815 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.6001744 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07079189 = queryNorm
        0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Source

http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja

0.10986525 = product of:
  0.27466312 = sum of:
    0.22962472 = weight(_text_:objects in 1567) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.22962472 = score(doc=1567,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.37626395 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07079189 = queryNorm
        0.6102756 = fieldWeight in 1567, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1567)
    0.045038395 = weight(_text_:21 in 1567) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.045038395 = score(doc=1567,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2193083 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07079189 = queryNorm
        0.20536566 = fieldWeight in 1567, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1567)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Abstract

Interlinking research objects using the RDF links facilitates sharing and data discovery on the Web of Data. This works toward enriching the research repositories by linking their research artifacts to various scientific or even general data on the Web. In this paper, we experiment on an interlinking approach over Dryad, a research object repository, to a digital library dataset in the Linked Open Data cloud. We fetch data from both targets in different steps, run an interlinking tool and report as well as analyze the results. The generated outputs and assessed matched links show that interlinking a research dataset like Dryad to Web of Data brings an added value to the repository, as it connects its research artefacts to scientific objects of other datasets.

Pages

S.14-21

0.09801429 = product of:
  0.24503572 = sum of:
    0.18748778 = weight(_text_:objects in 2835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18748778 = score(doc=2835,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.37626395 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07079189 = queryNorm
        0.49828792 = fieldWeight in 2835, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2835)
    0.05754794 = weight(_text_:22 in 2835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05754794 = score(doc=2835,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24790114 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07079189 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2835, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2835)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to develop methodology to determine conceptual overlap between research areas. It investigates patterns of terminology usage in scientific abstracts as boundary objects between research specialties. Research specialties were determined by high-level classifications assigned by Thomson Reuters in their Essential Science Indicators file, which provided a strictly hierarchical classification of journals into 22 categories. Results from the query "network theory" were downloaded from the Web of Science. From this file, two top-level groups, economics and social sciences, were selected and topically analyzed to provide a baseline of similarity on which to run an informetric analysis. The Places & Spaces Map of Science (Klavans and Boyack 2007) was used to determine the proximity of disciplines to one another in order to select the two disciplines use in the analysis. Groups analyzed share common theories and goals; however, groups used different language to describe their research. It was found that 61% of term words were shared between the two groups.

0.09572422 = product of:
  0.23931053 = sum of:
    0.19135392 = weight(_text_:objects in 143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19135392 = score(doc=143,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.37626395 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07079189 = queryNorm
        0.508563 = fieldWeight in 143, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=143)
    0.04795662 = weight(_text_:22 in 143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04795662 = score(doc=143,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24790114 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07079189 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 143, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=143)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Abstract

Documentary activities are informational operations of selection and representation of objects made from their features and predictable use. In order to make them more dynamic, these activities are carried out systemically, according to institutionally limited (in the sense of social institution) information projects. This organic approach leads to the constitution of information systems, or, more specifically, systems of documentary information, inasmuch as they refer to actions about documents as objects from which information is produced. Thus, systems of documentary information are called documentary systems. This article aims to list and systematize elements with the potential to a generalizing and categorical approach of documentary systems. We approach the systems according to: elements of reference (the documents and their information, the users, and the institutional context); constitutive elements (collection and references); structural elements (constituent units and the relation among them); modes of production (pre or post representation of the document); management aspects (flow of documents and of their information); and, finally, typology (management systems and information retrieval systems). Thus, documentary systems can be considered products due to operations involving objects institutionally limited for the production of collections (virtual or not) and their references, whose objective is the appropriation of information by the user.

Content

Beitrag einer Section "Selected Papers from the 1ST Brazilian Conference on Knowledge Organization And Representation, Faculdade de Ciência da Informação, Campus Universitário Darcy Ribeiro Brasília, DF Brasil, October 20-22, 2011" Vgl.: http://www.ergon-verlag.de/isko_ko/downloads/ko_39_2012_3_h.pdf.

0.09331312 = product of:
  0.23328279 = sum of:
    0.13257387 = weight(_text_:objects in 2085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13257387 = score(doc=2085,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.37626395 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07079189 = queryNorm
        0.35234275 = fieldWeight in 2085, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2085)
    0.10070892 = weight(_text_:21 in 2085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10070892 = score(doc=2085,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.2193083 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07079189 = queryNorm
        0.45921162 = fieldWeight in 2085, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2085)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Content

IntroductionDescribing manifestations and items -- Describing persons -- Describing families -- Describing corporate bodies -- Describing geographic entities -- Describing works -- Describing expressions -- Recording relationships -- Appendix A. Printed books and sheets -- Appendix B. Cartographic resources -- Appendix C. Unpublished manuscripts and manuscript collections -- Appendix D. Notated music -- Appendix E. Audio recordings -- Appendix F. Moving image resources -- Appendix G. Two-dimensional graphic resources -- Appendix H. Three-dimensional resources and objects -- Appendix I. Digital resources -- Appendix J. Microform resources -- Appendix K. Bibliographic records serials and integrating resources -- Appendix L. Analytical description.

LCSH

MARC 21

RSWK

Resource description and access / MARC 21 / Einführung

Subject

Resource description and access / MARC 21 / Einführung
MARC 21

0.09301048 = product of:
  0.23252618 = sum of:
    0.18748778 = weight(_text_:objects in 1382) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18748778 = score(doc=1382,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.37626395 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07079189 = queryNorm
        0.49828792 = fieldWeight in 1382, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1382)
    0.045038395 = weight(_text_:21 in 1382) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.045038395 = score(doc=1382,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2193083 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07079189 = queryNorm
        0.20536566 = fieldWeight in 1382, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1382)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Abstract

Classifying complex artistic objects, such as popular songs, raises important issues to knowledge organization studies. Historically, the popular song has been classified as a subcategory of other musical objects. However, recent researches show that the popular song is a specific artistic form that is endowed with its own language and, therefore, demands specific techniques for analysis, representation and, consequently, classification. Considering the different approaches toward popular songs in catalogues and contemporary systems, this paper identifies possible solutions, such as the use of descriptive metadata, the use of collaborative tagging or the creation of an ontology. In discussing the construction of an epistemological foundation used specifically for classifying the popular song, we reflect on the remaining challenges for the knowledge organization of complex artistic documents.

Date

3. 9.2014 21:35:43

0.08872351 = product of:
  0.22180878 = sum of:
    0.15466951 = weight(_text_:objects in 4227) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15466951 = score(doc=4227,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.37626395 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07079189 = queryNorm
        0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 4227, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4227)
    0.06713927 = weight(_text_:22 in 4227) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06713927 = score(doc=4227,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24790114 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07079189 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4227, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4227)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Source

Information processing and management. 46(2010) no.1, S.22-43

0.08872351 = product of:
  0.22180878 = sum of:
    0.15466951 = weight(_text_:objects in 1437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15466951 = score(doc=1437,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.37626395 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07079189 = queryNorm
        0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 1437, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1437)
    0.06713927 = weight(_text_:22 in 1437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06713927 = score(doc=1437,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24790114 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07079189 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1437, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1437)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Abstract

This paper describes to construct faceted ontologies for domain modeling. Building upon the faceted theory of S.R. Ranganathan (1967), the paper intends to address the faceted classification approach applied to build domain ontologies. As classificatory ontologies are employed to represent the relationships of entities and objects on the web, the faceted approach helps to analyze domain representation in an effective way for modeling. Based on this perspective, an ontology of the music domain has been analyzed that would serve as a case study.

Source

Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik

0.08288572 = product of:
  0.2072143 = sum of:
    0.15466951 = weight(_text_:objects in 62) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15466951 = score(doc=62,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.37626395 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07079189 = queryNorm
        0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 62, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=62)
    0.05254479 = weight(_text_:21 in 62) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05254479 = score(doc=62,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2193083 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07079189 = queryNorm
        0.23959327 = fieldWeight in 62, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=62)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Abstract

The paper discusses the challenges of categorising documents and "items of the world" to promote knowledge sharing in large communities of interest. We present the DOCMA method (Document and Item-based Model for Action) dedicated to end-users who have minimal or no knowledge of information science. Community members can elicit structure and indexed business items stemming from their query including projects, actors, products, places of interest, and geo-situated objects. This hybrid method was applied in a collaborative Web portal in the field of sustainability for the past two years.

Date

21. 3.2011 18:33:01

0.08288572 = product of:
  0.2072143 = sum of:
    0.15466951 = weight(_text_:objects in 4836) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15466951 = score(doc=4836,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.37626395 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07079189 = queryNorm
        0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 4836, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4836)
    0.05254479 = weight(_text_:21 in 4836) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05254479 = score(doc=4836,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2193083 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07079189 = queryNorm
        0.23959327 = fieldWeight in 4836, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4836)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Abstract

We present the DOCMA method (DOCument and Model for Action) focused to Socio-Semantic web applications in large communities of interest. DOCMA is dedicated to end-users without any knowledge in Information Science. Community Members can elicit, structure and index shared business items emerging from their inquiry (such as projects, actors, products, geographically situated objects of interest.). We apply DOCMA to an experiment in the field of Sustainable Development: the Cartodd-Map21 collaborative Web portal.

Date

3. 1.2012 10:21:41

0.08288572 = product of:
  0.2072143 = sum of:
    0.15466951 = weight(_text_:objects in 3990) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15466951 = score(doc=3990,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.37626395 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07079189 = queryNorm
        0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 3990, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3990)
    0.05254479 = weight(_text_:21 in 3990) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05254479 = score(doc=3990,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2193083 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07079189 = queryNorm
        0.23959327 = fieldWeight in 3990, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3990)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Abstract

Although the information-seeking literature has tended to focus upon the selection and use of inanimate objects as information sources, this research follows the more recent trend of investigating how individuals evaluate and use interpersonal information sources. By drawing from the structural, relational, and cognitive elements of social capital theory to inform antecedents to information quality and source accessibility, a research model is developed and tested. For interpersonal information sources, information quality is the key determinant of source use. Perceptions of information quality and accessibility of an interpersonal source are shown to be influenced by boundary spanning, transactive memory, and content type. Implications and prescriptions for future research are discussed.

Source

Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 68(2017) no.1, S.5-21

0.08206907 = product of:
  0.20517267 = sum of:
    0.09007679 = weight(_text_:21 in 2057) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09007679 = score(doc=2057,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2193083 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07079189 = queryNorm
        0.41073132 = fieldWeight in 2057, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2057)
    0.11509588 = weight(_text_:22 in 2057) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11509588 = score(doc=2057,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24790114 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07079189 = queryNorm
        0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2057, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2057)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Date

25. 8.2015 21:12:52
26. 8.2015 10:22:00

0.08206907 = product of:
  0.20517267 = sum of:
    0.09007679 = weight(_text_:21 in 2302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09007679 = score(doc=2302,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2193083 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07079189 = queryNorm
        0.41073132 = fieldWeight in 2302, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2302)
    0.11509588 = weight(_text_:22 in 2302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11509588 = score(doc=2302,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24790114 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07079189 = queryNorm
        0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2302, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2302)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Date

5.11.2015 21:43:18
10.11.2015 10:22:31

0.08167857 = product of:
  0.20419642 = sum of:
    0.15623981 = weight(_text_:objects in 4195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15623981 = score(doc=4195,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.37626395 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07079189 = queryNorm
        0.41523993 = fieldWeight in 4195, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4195)
    0.04795662 = weight(_text_:22 in 4195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04795662 = score(doc=4195,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24790114 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07079189 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4195, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4195)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Abstract

Webcasting systems were developed to provide remote access in real-time to live events. Today, these systems have an additional requirement: to accommodate the "second life" of webcasts as archival information objects. Research to date has focused on facilitating the production and storage of webcasts as well as the development of more interactive and collaborative multimedia tools to support the event, but research has not examined how people interact with a webcasting system to access and use the contents of those archived events. Using an experimental design, this study examined how 16 typical users interact with a webcasting system to respond to a set of information tasks: selecting a webcast, searching for specific information, and making a gist of a webcast. Using several data sources that included user actions, user perceptions, and user explanations of their actions and decisions, the study also examined the strategies employed to complete the tasks. The results revealed distinctive system-use patterns for each task and provided insights into the types of tools needed to make webcasting systems better suited for also using the webcasts as information objects.

Date

22. 1.2011 14:16:14

0.07870541 = product of:
  0.39352703 = sum of:
    0.39352703 = weight(_text_:3a in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.39352703 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.6001744 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07079189 = queryNorm
        0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Footnote

Rez. in: Philosophisch-ethische Rezensionen vom 09.11.2019 (Jürgen Czogalla), Unter: https://philosophisch-ethische-rezensionen.de/rezension/Goedert1.html. In: B.I.T. online 23(2020) H.3, S.345-347 (W. Sühl-Strohmenger) [Unter: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.b-i-t-online.de%2Fheft%2F2020-03-rezensionen.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0iY3f_zNcvEjeZ6inHVnOK]. In: Open Password Nr. 805 vom 14.08.2020 (H.-C. Hobohm) [Unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzE0MywiOGI3NjZkZmNkZjQ1IiwwLDAsMTMxLDFd].