Search (2075 results, page 1 of 104)

  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011) 1.00 
    0.9968025 = sum of:
  0.9696204 = product of:
    1.4544306 = sum of:
      0.5417713 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.5417713 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.48198745 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056851476 = queryNorm
          1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
      0.91265935 = weight(_text_:2fdoc in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.91265935 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.6255789 = queryWeight, product of:
            11.00374 = idf(docFreq=1, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056851476 = queryNorm
          1.4589037 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            11.00374 = idf(docFreq=1, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
    0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.027182125 = product of:
    0.08154637 = sum of:
      0.08154637 = weight(_text_:12 in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08154637 = score(doc=973,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.15724345 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056851476 = queryNorm
          0.5185995 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
    Date
    12. 9.2023 19:15:48
    12. 9.2023 19:25:17
  2. Williamson, N.J.: Paradigms and conceptual systems in knowledge organization, the Eleventh International ISKO Conference, Rome, 2010 (2013) 0.19 
    0.19387685 = product of:
  0.3877537 = sum of:
    0.3877537 = sum of:
      0.30019942 = weight(_text_:abridged in 638) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.30019942 = score(doc=638,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.4697581 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.2629 = idf(docFreq=30, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056851476 = queryNorm
          0.6390511 = fieldWeight in 638, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.2629 = idf(docFreq=30, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=638)
      0.03363616 = weight(_text_:12 in 638) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03363616 = score(doc=638,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15724345 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056851476 = queryNorm
          0.21391137 = fieldWeight in 638, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=638)
      0.05391813 = weight(_text_:22 in 638) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05391813 = score(doc=638,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19908418 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056851476 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 638, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=638)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The eleventh International ISKO Conference on "Paradigms and Conceptual Systems in Knowledge Organization" was held in Rome, February 23-26, 2010. The proceedings were edited by Claudio Gnoli and Fulvio Mazzocchi and published by Ergon Verlag in 2010. This analysis follows the order of the text of the proceedings, an order prescribed from the abridged scheme for KO literature published in Knowledge Organization, 25, 1998, no. 4, p. 226. Some invited papers, marked with [LR], have been included and are labelled as such in the table of contents. In all, 64 papers were published.
    Date
    22. 2.2013 12:09:50
  3. Satija, M.P.: Abridged Dewey-15 (2012) in historical perspectives (2012) 0.19 
    0.18791752 = product of:
  0.37583503 = sum of:
    0.37583503 = product of:
      0.56375253 = sum of:
        0.5252396 = weight(_text_:abridged in 116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.5252396 = score(doc=116,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.4697581 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.2629 = idf(docFreq=30, maxDocs=44218)
              0.056851476 = queryNorm
            1.1181065 = fieldWeight in 116, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              8.2629 = idf(docFreq=30, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=116)
        0.03851295 = weight(_text_:22 in 116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03851295 = score(doc=116,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19908418 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.056851476 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 116, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=116)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The origin of the abridged edition of the Dewey system goes back to 1894 when an outline of 192 pages based on the full 5th Edition (1894) was issued for small public and school libraries of North America. New editions have appeared regularly following closely the publication of new full editions. An abridged version, which is always in one volume, comprises an introduction, schedules, four tables (namely 1, 2, 3 and 4) only, and the relative index and other minor features of the full edition, and has shorter numbers. Abridged 15 is a logical abridgement of the DDC23 (2011) and is a product of a new approach to development of an abridged edition of the DDC. Its content has been derived from the DDC database applying a set of rules to extract the edition using the new (2010) version of the editorial support system. The revision process has been informed by interaction with an always widening and diversified Dewey community at home and abroad. It aims to improve the currency of the schedules continuing to serve as shelving tool while recognizing its 'other' uses as a spinoff of its simplicity and inexpensiveness.
    Date
    3. 3.2016 18:59:22
    Object
    DDC-15 Abridged
  4. Ridenour, L.: Boundary objects : measuring gaps and overlap between research areas (2016) 0.11 
    0.10818165 = sum of:
  0.050189164 = product of:
    0.15056749 = sum of:
      0.15056749 = weight(_text_:objects in 2835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.15056749 = score(doc=2835,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.30216965 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056851476 = queryNorm
          0.49828792 = fieldWeight in 2835, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2835)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.057992484 = product of:
    0.086988725 = sum of:
      0.040773187 = weight(_text_:12 in 2835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.040773187 = score(doc=2835,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.15724345 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056851476 = queryNorm
          0.25929976 = fieldWeight in 2835, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2835)
      0.046215538 = weight(_text_:22 in 2835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.046215538 = score(doc=2835,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19908418 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056851476 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2835, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2835)
    0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    The aim of this paper is to develop methodology to determine conceptual overlap between research areas. It investigates patterns of terminology usage in scientific abstracts as boundary objects between research specialties. Research specialties were determined by high-level classifications assigned by Thomson Reuters in their Essential Science Indicators file, which provided a strictly hierarchical classification of journals into 22 categories. Results from the query "network theory" were downloaded from the Web of Science. From this file, two top-level groups, economics and social sciences, were selected and topically analyzed to provide a baseline of similarity on which to run an informetric analysis. The Places & Spaces Map of Science (Klavans and Boyack 2007) was used to determine the proximity of disciplines to one another in order to select the two disciplines use in the analysis. Groups analyzed share common theories and goals; however, groups used different language to describe their research. It was found that 61% of term words were shared between the two groups.
    Date
    12. 3.2016 14:00:12
  5. Dick, S.J.: Astronomy's Three Kingdom System : a comprehensive classification system of celestial objects (2019) 0.10 
    0.100780606 = sum of:
  0.08280789 = product of:
    0.24842367 = sum of:
      0.24842367 = weight(_text_:objects in 5455) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.24842367 = score(doc=5455,freq=8.0), product of:
          0.30216965 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056851476 = queryNorm
          0.82213306 = fieldWeight in 5455, product of:
            2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
              8.0 = termFreq=8.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5455)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.017972711 = product of:
    0.05391813 = sum of:
      0.05391813 = weight(_text_:22 in 5455) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05391813 = score(doc=5455,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19908418 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056851476 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5455, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5455)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Although classification has been an important aspect of astronomy since stellar spectroscopy in the late nineteenth century, to date no comprehensive classification system has existed for all classes of objects in the universe. Here we present such a system, and lay out its foundational definitions and principles. The system consists of the "Three Kingdoms" of planets, stars and galaxies, eighteen families, and eighty-two classes of objects. Gravitation is the defining organizing principle for the families and classes, and the physical nature of the objects is the defining characteristic of the classes. The system should prove useful for both scientific and pedagogical purposes.
    Date
    21.11.2019 18:46:22
  6. Aker, A.; Plaza, L.; Lloret, E.; Gaizauskas, R.: Do humans have conceptual models about geographic objects? : a user study (2013) 0.09 
    0.09165722 = sum of:
  0.08364861 = product of:
    0.2509458 = sum of:
      0.2509458 = weight(_text_:objects in 680) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.2509458 = score(doc=680,freq=16.0), product of:
          0.30216965 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056851476 = queryNorm
          0.83047986 = fieldWeight in 680, product of:
            4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
              16.0 = termFreq=16.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=680)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.00800861 = product of:
    0.02402583 = sum of:
      0.02402583 = weight(_text_:12 in 680) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.02402583 = score(doc=680,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15724345 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056851476 = queryNorm
          0.15279384 = fieldWeight in 680, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=680)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    In this article, we investigate what sorts of information humans request about geographical objects of the same type. For example, Edinburgh Castle and Bodiam Castle are two objects of the same type: "castle." The question is whether specific information is requested for the object type "castle" and how this information differs for objects of other types (e.g., church, museum, or lake). We aim to answer this question using an online survey. In the survey, we showed 184 participants 200 images pertaining to urban and rural objects and asked them to write questions for which they would like to know the answers when seeing those objects. Our analysis of the 6,169 questions collected in the survey shows that humans have shared ideas of what to ask about geographical objects. When the object types resemble each other (e.g., church and temple), the requested information is similar for the objects of these types. Otherwise, the information is specific to an object type. Our results may be very useful in guiding Natural Language Processing tasks involving automatic generation of templates for image descriptions and their assessment, as well as image indexing and organization.
    Date
    23. 3.2013 12:32:04
  7. Huvila, I.: ¬The politics of boundary objects : hegemonic interventions and the making of a document (2011) 0.09 
    0.08896638 = sum of:
  0.079356045 = product of:
    0.23806812 = sum of:
      0.23806812 = weight(_text_:objects in 4936) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.23806812 = score(doc=4936,freq=10.0), product of:
          0.30216965 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056851476 = queryNorm
          0.7878624 = fieldWeight in 4936, product of:
            3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
              10.0 = termFreq=10.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4936)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.009610333 = product of:
    0.028830996 = sum of:
      0.028830996 = weight(_text_:12 in 4936) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.028830996 = score(doc=4936,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15724345 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056851476 = queryNorm
          0.1833526 = fieldWeight in 4936, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4936)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Boundary objects are artifacts that reside in the interface between communities and are capable of bridging assumed and experienced differences. Bridging is not, however, necessarily a neutral or a consensual activity. With an emphasis on documents, the present article discusses the politics of boundary objects by analyzing the role of archaeological reports at boundaries between communities with conflicting interests. The analysis demonstrates and discusses the political and purposeful nature of boundary objects-how they are devices for creating and maintaining hegemonies within communities and achieving authority over other intersecting groups of people. The study uses the notion of hegemony and the discourse theory of Laclau and Mouffe (2001) to conceptualize the role of boundary objects as articulations of power and to explicate the dynamics of how the power is exercised.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.12, S.2528-2539
  8. Holetschek, J. et al.: Natural history in Europeana : accessing scientific collection objects via LOD (2016) 0.08 
    0.0848238 = sum of:
  0.059148498 = product of:
    0.17744549 = sum of:
      0.17744549 = weight(_text_:objects in 3277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.17744549 = score(doc=3277,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.30216965 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056851476 = queryNorm
          0.58723795 = fieldWeight in 3277, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3277)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.0256753 = product of:
    0.0770259 = sum of:
      0.0770259 = weight(_text_:22 in 3277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0770259 = score(doc=3277,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19908418 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056851476 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3277, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3277)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
  9. Shala, E.: ¬Die Autonomie des Menschen und der Maschine : gegenwärtige Definitionen von Autonomie zwischen philosophischem Hintergrund und technologischer Umsetzbarkeit (2014) 0.08 
    0.083254635 = sum of:
  0.07524602 = product of:
    0.22573805 = sum of:
      0.22573805 = weight(_text_:3a in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.22573805 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.48198745 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056851476 = queryNorm
          0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.00800861 = product of:
    0.02402583 = sum of:
      0.02402583 = weight(_text_:12 in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.02402583 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15724345 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056851476 = queryNorm
          0.15279384 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    7. 8.2018 12:05:42
    Footnote
    Vgl. unter: https://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwizweHljdbcAhVS16QKHXcFD9QQFjABegQICRAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Fpublication%2F271200105_Die_Autonomie_des_Menschen_und_der_Maschine_-_gegenwartige_Definitionen_von_Autonomie_zwischen_philosophischem_Hintergrund_und_technologischer_Umsetzbarkeit_Redigierte_Version_der_Magisterarbeit_Karls&usg=AOvVaw06orrdJmFF2xbCCp_hL26q.
  10. Marchese, C.; Smiraglia, R.P.: Boundary objects: CWA, an HR Firm, and emergent vocabulary (2013) 0.08 
    0.0829258 = sum of:
  0.071713746 = product of:
    0.21514122 = sum of:
      0.21514122 = weight(_text_:objects in 1066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.21514122 = score(doc=1066,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.30216965 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056851476 = queryNorm
          0.7119882 = fieldWeight in 1066, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1066)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.011212054 = product of:
    0.03363616 = sum of:
      0.03363616 = weight(_text_:12 in 1066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03363616 = score(doc=1066,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15724345 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056851476 = queryNorm
          0.21391137 = fieldWeight in 1066, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1066)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Knowledge organization structures are dependent upon domain-analytical processes for determining ontological imperatives. Boundary objects-terms used in multiple domains but understood differently in each-are ontological clash points. Cognitive Work Analysis is an effective qualitative methodology for domain analysis of a group of people who work together. CWA was used recently to understand the ontology of a human resources firm. Boundary objects from the taxonomy that emerged from narrative analysis are presented here for individual analysis.
    Date
    19. 9.2013 19:12:38
  11. Benoit, G.; Hussey, L.: Repurposing digital objects : case studies across the publishing industry (2011) 0.08 
    0.07652673 = sum of:
  0.058554024 = product of:
    0.17566207 = sum of:
      0.17566207 = weight(_text_:objects in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.17566207 = score(doc=4198,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.30216965 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056851476 = queryNorm
          0.5813359 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.017972711 = product of:
    0.05391813 = sum of:
      0.05391813 = weight(_text_:22 in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05391813 = score(doc=4198,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19908418 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056851476 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Large, data-rich organizations have tremendously large collections of digital objects to be "repurposed," to respond quickly and economically to publishing, marketing, and information needs. Some management typically assume that a content management system, or some other technique such as OWL and RDF, will automatically address the workflow and technical issues associated with this reuse. Four case studies show that the sources of some roadblocks to agile repurposing are as much managerial and organizational as they are technical in nature. The review concludes with suggestions on how digital object repurposing can be integrated given these organizations' structures.
    Date
    22. 1.2011 14:23:07
  12. Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014) 0.08 
    0.07524602 = product of:
  0.15049204 = sum of:
    0.15049204 = product of:
      0.4514761 = sum of:
        0.4514761 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.4514761 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.48198745 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.056851476 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
  13. Gerstenkorn, A.: Entities and quiddities : about ontological and epistemological conceptualization for knowledge organization (2010) 0.07 
    0.07413864 = sum of:
  0.066130035 = product of:
    0.1983901 = sum of:
      0.1983901 = weight(_text_:objects in 3511) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.1983901 = score(doc=3511,freq=10.0), product of:
          0.30216965 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056851476 = queryNorm
          0.656552 = fieldWeight in 3511, product of:
            3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
              10.0 = termFreq=10.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3511)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.00800861 = product of:
    0.02402583 = sum of:
      0.02402583 = weight(_text_:12 in 3511) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.02402583 = score(doc=3511,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15724345 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056851476 = queryNorm
          0.15279384 = fieldWeight in 3511, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3511)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Let us say that anything we can talk about is an entity, anything we can truly say about an entity is a quiddity (Latin quid "what"). Each quiddity is in turn an entity. So objects, concepts and names (terms) are entities and have quiddities. The properties (quiddities) of objects are represented by characteristics (quiddities) of concepts, and these quiddities are concepts themselves. There are simple concepts and complex sets of concepts. Entities and quiddities can be r e.g.arded differently in different languages and disciplines; their ontological cat e.g.orization depends on the respective epistemological point of view. Material objects usually represent themselves, names usually represent something else (objects via concepts), but both are part of the world outside the brain, where only individuals exist. However, names can also represent themselves and then . their quiddities refer to their appearance (e.g. black letters) or function (e.g. noun), etc. Immaterial objects as "preconceptual" entities and concepts exist only within the brain. A concept, general or individual, is composed of a name concept and an object concept, which although stored in different parts of the brain (brain research) usually remain in contact with each other.
    Series
    Advances in knowledge organization; vol.12
  14. Chaves Guimarães, J.A.; Sales, R. de; Martínez-Ávila, D.; Alencar, M.F.: ¬The conceptual dimension of knowledge organization in the ISKO proceedings domain : a Bardinian content analysis (2014) 0.07 
    0.07126677 = sum of:
  0.029574249 = product of:
    0.08872274 = sum of:
      0.08872274 = weight(_text_:objects in 1410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08872274 = score(doc=1410,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.30216965 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056851476 = queryNorm
          0.29361898 = fieldWeight in 1410, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1410)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.04169252 = product of:
    0.06253878 = sum of:
      0.02402583 = weight(_text_:12 in 1410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.02402583 = score(doc=1410,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15724345 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056851476 = queryNorm
          0.15279384 = fieldWeight in 1410, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1410)
      0.03851295 = weight(_text_:22 in 1410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03851295 = score(doc=1410,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19908418 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056851476 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1410, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1410)
    0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    This paper aims to study the conceptual dimension of Knowledge Organization (KO) in the ISKO proceedings (1990-2012) domain. After analyzing a corpus of 71 papers that presented the term "knowledge organization" in their titles, using the methodology of Bardin's content analysis, it was possible to obtain a set of 11 definitions of KO which were studied using the following categories: nature, object, tools, processes, and perspectives/approaches. These categories act as a basis to identify the communities of authors that interact in the domain under different conceptual perspectives. The results show that KO has been mainly understood as an area or field of knowledge whose objects are recorded knowledge and conceptual structures, and whose main processes are classification and indexing, as well as information retrieval. The nature of KO is mostly linked to the construction of specialized discourses and the methodological dimension of such area is related to the systematization of recorded scientific knowledge.
    Date
    2.10.2017 19:18:12
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  15. Taheri, S.M.; Shahrestani, Z.; Nezhad, M.H.Y.: Switching languages and the national content consortiums : an overview on the challenges of designing an Iranian model (2014) 0.07 
    0.07126677 = sum of:
  0.029574249 = product of:
    0.08872274 = sum of:
      0.08872274 = weight(_text_:objects in 1447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08872274 = score(doc=1447,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.30216965 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056851476 = queryNorm
          0.29361898 = fieldWeight in 1447, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1447)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.04169252 = product of:
    0.06253878 = sum of:
      0.02402583 = weight(_text_:12 in 1447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.02402583 = score(doc=1447,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15724345 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056851476 = queryNorm
          0.15279384 = fieldWeight in 1447, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1447)
      0.03851295 = weight(_text_:22 in 1447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03851295 = score(doc=1447,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19908418 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056851476 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1447, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1447)
    0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    The aim of this study, as a conceptual research, is to analyze the challenges of designing a switching language for the Iranian National Content Consortium (INCC) by an analytical-critical approach. The current situation of the semantic systems which have been being constructed and developed in Iran and the challenges of designing a switching language for the INCC are examined. To be approximation of mapping among the subjective terms of the Iranian semantic systems, such as thesauri, the list of subject headings, and classification schemes, the ambiguity of the native features of Islamic-Iranian information context, the lack of a general and comprehensive classification schema, the accessibility of content objects in other non-Persian languages, and like them, are the most important challenges for designing an Iranian model of the switching language for the INCC. The study is the first in its kind dealing with the challenges of designing a switching language in a practical approach that emphasize the information environment of the INCC.
    Date
    5. 9.2014 12:59:16
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  16. Veinot, T.C.; Pierce, C.S.: Materiality in information environments : objects, spaces, and bodies in three outpatient hemodialysis facilities (2019) 0.07 
    0.067157105 = sum of:
  0.059148498 = product of:
    0.17744549 = sum of:
      0.17744549 = weight(_text_:objects in 5437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.17744549 = score(doc=5437,freq=8.0), product of:
          0.30216965 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056851476 = queryNorm
          0.58723795 = fieldWeight in 5437, product of:
            2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
              8.0 = termFreq=8.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5437)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.00800861 = product of:
    0.02402583 = sum of:
      0.02402583 = weight(_text_:12 in 5437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.02402583 = score(doc=5437,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15724345 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056851476 = queryNorm
          0.15279384 = fieldWeight in 5437, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5437)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    The materiality of information environments, and its role in information behavior, has received little attention. We present an ethnographic study involving 156 hours of observation and 28 patient interviews in outpatient hemodialysis facilities. Using an extended "Semiotic Framework for Information Systems Research," the findings show that objects, spaces, and bodies were integral to 6 sociomaterial layers of facility information environments: the physical, empiric, syntactic, semantic, pragmatic, and social world. Objects of importance in the information environments included dialysis machines, instruments, records, paper documents, televisions, furniture, thermostats, lighting, and personal possessions. Spatial features, including compartmentalization, displays, distance, proximity, and spatially-grounded routines, also constituted information environments. The information environments were also shaped by patient immobility, bodily discomforts, and orientation to bodily states. Each sociomaterial layer introduced enablers and constraints to information access, flow, and acceptance; these combined to construct patients primarily as passive recipients of information rather than active seekers and producers of information. A sociomaterial perspective and related focus on objects, spaces, and bodies offers a lens for professional information practice. We contribute information environment design guidance to facilitate such practice and stress that the value of certain sources and types of information can be materially encoded in an environment.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 70(2019) no.12, S.1324-1339
  17. Batorowska, H.; Kaminska-Czubala, B.: Information retrieval support : visualisation of the information space of a document (2014) 0.07 
    0.066813454 = sum of:
  0.033459444 = product of:
    0.10037833 = sum of:
      0.10037833 = weight(_text_:objects in 1444) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.10037833 = score(doc=1444,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.30216965 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056851476 = queryNorm
          0.33219194 = fieldWeight in 1444, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1444)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.033354014 = product of:
    0.05003102 = sum of:
      0.019220663 = weight(_text_:12 in 1444) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.019220663 = score(doc=1444,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15724345 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056851476 = queryNorm
          0.12223507 = fieldWeight in 1444, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1444)
      0.03081036 = weight(_text_:22 in 1444) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03081036 = score(doc=1444,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19908418 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056851476 = queryNorm
          0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1444, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1444)
    0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Acquiring knowledge in any field involves information retrieval, i.e. searching the available documents to identify answers to the queries concerning the selected objects. Knowing the keywords which are names of the objects will enable situating the user's query in the information space organized as a thesaurus or faceted classification. Objectives: Identification the areas in the information space which correspond to gaps in the user's personal knowledge or in the domain knowledge might become useful in theory or practice. The aim of this paper is to present a realistic information-space model of a self-authored full-text document on information culture, indexed by the author of this article. Methodology: Having established the relations between the terms, particular modules (sets of terms connected by relations used in facet classification) are situated on a plain, similarly to a communication map. Conclusions drawn from the "journey" on the map, which is a visualization of the knowledge contained in the analysed document, are the crucial part of this paper. Results: The direct result of the research is the created model of information space visualization of a given document (book, article, website). The proposed procedure can practically be used as a new form of representation in order to map the contents of academic books and articles, beside the traditional index form, especially as an e-book auxiliary tool. In teaching, visualization of the information space of a document can be used to help students understand the issues of: classification, categorization and representation of new knowledge emerging in human mind.
    Date
    5. 9.2014 12:36:59
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  18. (2013 ff.) 0.07 
    0.06670803 = product of:
  0.13341606 = sum of:
    0.13341606 = product of:
      0.20012408 = sum of:
        0.07688265 = weight(_text_:12 in 2851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07688265 = score(doc=2851,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15724345 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
              0.056851476 = queryNorm
            0.48894027 = fieldWeight in 2851, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2851)
        0.12324144 = weight(_text_:22 in 2851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12324144 = score(doc=2851,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19908418 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.056851476 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2851, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2851)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    6.10.2015 12:42:40
  19. Ortega, C.D.: Conceptual and procedural grounding of documentary systems (2012) 0.06 
    0.064061746 = sum of:
  0.051224098 = product of:
    0.1536723 = sum of:
      0.1536723 = weight(_text_:objects in 143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.1536723 = score(doc=143,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.30216965 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056851476 = queryNorm
          0.508563 = fieldWeight in 143, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=143)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.01283765 = product of:
    0.03851295 = sum of:
      0.03851295 = weight(_text_:22 in 143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03851295 = score(doc=143,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19908418 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056851476 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 143, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=143)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Documentary activities are informational operations of selection and representation of objects made from their features and predictable use. In order to make them more dynamic, these activities are carried out systemically, according to institutionally limited (in the sense of social institution) information projects. This organic approach leads to the constitution of information systems, or, more specifically, systems of documentary information, inasmuch as they refer to actions about documents as objects from which information is produced. Thus, systems of documentary information are called documentary systems. This article aims to list and systematize elements with the potential to a generalizing and categorical approach of documentary systems. We approach the systems according to: elements of reference (the documents and their information, the users, and the institutional context); constitutive elements (collection and references); structural elements (constituent units and the relation among them); modes of production (pre or post representation of the document); management aspects (flow of documents and of their information); and, finally, typology (management systems and information retrieval systems). Thus, documentary systems can be considered products due to operations involving objects institutionally limited for the production of collections (virtual or not) and their references, whose objective is the appropriation of information by the user.
    Content
    Beitrag einer Section "Selected Papers from the 1ST Brazilian Conference on Knowledge Organization And Representation, Faculdade de Ciência da Informação, Campus Universitário Darcy Ribeiro Brasília, DF Brasil, October 20-22, 2011" Vgl.: http://www.ergon-verlag.de/isko_ko/downloads/ko_39_2012_3_h.pdf.
  20. British Library / FAST/Dewey Review Group: Consultation on subject indexing and classification standards applied by the British Library (2015) 0.06 
    0.06064944 = product of:
  0.12129888 = sum of:
    0.12129888 = product of:
      0.36389664 = sum of:
        0.36389664 = weight(_text_:abridged in 2810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.36389664 = score(doc=2810,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.4697581 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.2629 = idf(docFreq=30, maxDocs=44218)
              0.056851476 = queryNorm
            0.7746469 = fieldWeight in 2810, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.2629 = idf(docFreq=30, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2810)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    The Library is consulting with stakeholders concerning the potential impact of these proposals. No firm decisions have yet been taken regarding either of these standards. FAST 1. The British Library proposes to adopt FAST selectively to extend the scope of subject indexing of current and legacy content. 2. The British Library proposes to implement FAST as a replacement for LCSH in all current cataloguing, subject to mitigation of the risks identified above, in particular the question of sustainability. DDC 3. The British Library proposes to implement Abridged DDC selectively to extend the scope of subject indexing of current and legacy content.
    Source
    http://www.bl.uk/bibliographic/pdfs/british-library-consultation-fast-abridged-dewey.pdf

Authors

Languages

  • e 1439
  • d 608
  • a 1
  • f 1
  • hu 1
  • i 1
  • pt 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 1797
  • el 209
  • m 166
  • s 47
  • x 24
  • r 17
  • b 5
  • n 5
  • i 4
  • p 1
  • v 1
  • z 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications