Search (2488 results, page 1 of 125)

  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Boteram, F.: Semantische Relationen in Dokumentationssprachen : vom Thesaurus zum semantischen Netz (2010) 0.23 
    0.22628574 = product of:
  0.3394286 = sum of:
    0.044774026 = weight(_text_:und in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.044774026 = score(doc=4792,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.10663647 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048113182 = queryNorm
        0.41987535 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
    0.087221414 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.087221414 = score(doc=4792,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23293893 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048113182 = queryNorm
        0.37443897 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
    0.04942768 = weight(_text_:des in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04942768 = score(doc=4792,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.13324021 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048113182 = queryNorm
        0.3709667 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
    0.15800548 = sum of:
      0.112374775 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.112374775 = score(doc=4792,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.22233479 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
            0.048113182 = queryNorm
          0.50543046 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
      0.045630705 = weight(_text_:22 in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.045630705 = score(doc=4792,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16848417 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.048113182 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
  0.6666667 = coord(4/6)
    Abstract
    Moderne Verfahren des Information Retrieval verlangen nach aussagekräftigen und detailliert relationierten Dokumentationssprachen. Der selektive Transfer einzelner Modellierungsstrategien aus dem Bereich semantischer Technologien für die Gestaltung und Relationierung bestehender Dokumentationssprachen wird diskutiert. In Form einer Taxonomie wird ein hierarchisch strukturiertes Relationeninventar definiert, welches sowohl hinreichend allgemeine als auch zahlreiche spezifische Relationstypen enthält, die eine detaillierte und damit aussagekräftige Relationierung des Vokabulars ermöglichen. Das bringt einen Zugewinn an Übersichtlichkeit und Funktionalität. Im Gegensatz zu anderen Ansätzen und Überlegungen zur Schaffung von Relationeninventaren entwickelt der vorgestellte Vorschlag das Relationeninventar aus der Begriffsmenge eines bestehenden Gegenstandsbereichs heraus.
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  2. Berti, Jr., D.W.; Lima, G.; Maculan, B.; Soergel, D.: Computer-assisted checking of conceptual relationships in a large thesaurus (2018) 0.22 
    0.22250888 = product of:
  0.3337633 = sum of:
    0.020890193 = weight(_text_:und in 4721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020890193 = score(doc=4721,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10663647 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048113182 = queryNorm
        0.19590102 = fieldWeight in 4721, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4721)
    0.099681616 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 4721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.099681616 = score(doc=4721,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23293893 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048113182 = queryNorm
        0.42793027 = fieldWeight in 4721, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4721)
    0.032613806 = weight(_text_:des in 4721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.032613806 = score(doc=4721,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13324021 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048113182 = queryNorm
        0.24477452 = fieldWeight in 4721, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4721)
    0.18057768 = sum of:
      0.12842831 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 4721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.12842831 = score(doc=4721,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.22233479 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
            0.048113182 = queryNorm
          0.5776348 = fieldWeight in 4721, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4721)
      0.052149374 = weight(_text_:22 in 4721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.052149374 = score(doc=4721,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16848417 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.048113182 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4721, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4721)
  0.6666667 = coord(4/6)
    Date
    17. 1.2019 19:04:22
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  3. Schenk, J.: Konzept Gender Thesaurus : zur Bedeutung einer gemeinsamen Dokumentationssprache für Forschung und Informationseinrichtungen (2016) 0.19 
    0.18902457 = product of:
  0.28353685 = sum of:
    0.05908639 = weight(_text_:und in 3141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05908639 = score(doc=3141,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.10663647 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048113182 = queryNorm
        0.55409175 = fieldWeight in 3141, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3141)
    0.099681616 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 3141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.099681616 = score(doc=3141,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23293893 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048113182 = queryNorm
        0.42793027 = fieldWeight in 3141, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3141)
    0.04612289 = weight(_text_:des in 3141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04612289 = score(doc=3141,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.13324021 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048113182 = queryNorm
        0.34616345 = fieldWeight in 3141, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3141)
    0.07864596 = product of:
      0.15729192 = sum of:
        0.15729192 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 3141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15729192 = score(doc=3141,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.22233479 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048113182 = queryNorm
            0.7074553 = fieldWeight in 3141, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3141)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(4/6)
    Abstract
    Angesichts aktueller und voraussichtlich in naher Zukunft startender Infrastrukturprojekte der Frauen/Gender-Informationseinrichtungen einerseits und der Gender Studies andererseits, soll im Folgenden auf den Sinn und die Notwendigkeit einer gemeinsamen gendersensiblen Dokumentationssprache hingewiesen werden. Dieser Beitrag entstand im Rahmen des Masterstudiums der Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaften (MALIS) an der Technischen Hochschule Köln und verfolgt das Ziel, Vorschläge für die Erarbeitung eines Gender Thesaurus zu entwickeln.
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. 69(2016) H.2, S.221-235
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  4. Keyser, P. de: Indexing : from thesauri to the Semantic Web (2012) 0.18 
    0.18131348 = product of:
  0.2719702 = sum of:
    0.015667645 = weight(_text_:und in 3197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015667645 = score(doc=3197,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10663647 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048113182 = queryNorm
        0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 3197, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3197)
    0.07476121 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 3197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07476121 = score(doc=3197,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23293893 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048113182 = queryNorm
        0.3209477 = fieldWeight in 3197, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3197)
    0.024460357 = weight(_text_:des in 3197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024460357 = score(doc=3197,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13324021 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048113182 = queryNorm
        0.18358089 = fieldWeight in 3197, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3197)
    0.15708098 = sum of:
      0.11796895 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 3197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11796895 = score(doc=3197,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.22233479 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
            0.048113182 = queryNorm
          0.5305915 = fieldWeight in 3197, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3197)
      0.03911203 = weight(_text_:22 in 3197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03911203 = score(doc=3197,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16848417 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.048113182 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3197, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3197)
  0.6666667 = coord(4/6)
    Date
    24. 8.2016 14:03:22
    RSWK
    Thesaurus
    Subject
    Thesaurus
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  5. Kempf, A.O.: Thesauri und Interoperabilität mit anderen Vokabularen : Die neue Thesaurusnorm ISO 25964 (2013) 0.18 
    0.17823714 = product of:
  0.2673557 = sum of:
    0.045228597 = weight(_text_:und in 1144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.045228597 = score(doc=1144,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.10663647 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048113182 = queryNorm
        0.42413816 = fieldWeight in 1144, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1144)
    0.12460202 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 1144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12460202 = score(doc=1144,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23293893 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048113182 = queryNorm
        0.5349128 = fieldWeight in 1144, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1144)
    0.040767264 = weight(_text_:des in 1144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.040767264 = score(doc=1144,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13324021 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048113182 = queryNorm
        0.30596817 = fieldWeight in 1144, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1144)
    0.056757826 = product of:
      0.11351565 = sum of:
        0.11351565 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 1144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11351565 = score(doc=1144,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22233479 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048113182 = queryNorm
            0.5105618 = fieldWeight in 1144, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1144)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(4/6)
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 64(2013) H.6, S.365-368
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  6. Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Teil 1 der Thesaurus-Norm ISO 25964 veröffentlicht (2012) 0.17 
    0.1669862 = product of:
  0.25047928 = sum of:
    0.065905586 = weight(_text_:und in 176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.065905586 = score(doc=176,freq=26.0), product of:
        0.10663647 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048113182 = queryNorm
        0.6180398 = fieldWeight in 176, product of:
          5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
            26.0 = termFreq=26.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=176)
    0.087221414 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.087221414 = score(doc=176,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23293893 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048113182 = queryNorm
        0.37443897 = fieldWeight in 176, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=176)
    0.028537082 = weight(_text_:des in 176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028537082 = score(doc=176,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13324021 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048113182 = queryNorm
        0.2141777 = fieldWeight in 176, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=176)
    0.06881522 = product of:
      0.13763043 = sum of:
        0.13763043 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13763043 = score(doc=176,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.22233479 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048113182 = queryNorm
            0.6190234 = fieldWeight in 176, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=176)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(4/6)
    Abstract
    Die neue internationale Thesaurus-Norm ISO 25964-1 ersetzt die Normen ISO 2788 und ISO 5964. Ihr englischer Titel lautet "Information and documentation - Thesauri and interoperability with other vocabularies - Part 1: Thesauri for information retrieval". Die Norm umfasst ein- und mehrsprachige Thesauri und berück sichtigt die Notwendigkeit von Datenaustausch, Vernetzung und Interoperabilität. Zu den Inhalten gehören - Konstruktion ein- und mehrsprachiger Thesauri - Unterschied zwischen Begriff und Benennung und ihren Beziehungen - Facettenanalyse und Layout - Einsatz von Thesauri in computergestützten und vernetzten Systemen - Management und Pflege von Thesauri - Richtlinien für Thesaurusmanagement-Software - Datenmodell für ein- und mehrsprachige Thesauri - Empfehlungen
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 63(2012) H.2, S.122-123
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  7. Gastmeyer, M.; Wannags, M.-M.; Neubert, J.: Relaunch des Standard-Thesaurus Wirtschaft : Dynamik in der Wissensrepräsentation (2016) 0.16 
    0.15817805 = product of:
  0.23726706 = sum of:
    0.04087291 = weight(_text_:und in 3238) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04087291 = score(doc=3238,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.10663647 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048113182 = queryNorm
        0.38329202 = fieldWeight in 3238, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3238)
    0.087221414 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 3238) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.087221414 = score(doc=3238,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23293893 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048113182 = queryNorm
        0.37443897 = fieldWeight in 3238, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3238)
    0.040357526 = weight(_text_:des in 3238) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.040357526 = score(doc=3238,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.13324021 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048113182 = queryNorm
        0.302893 = fieldWeight in 3238, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3238)
    0.06881522 = product of:
      0.13763043 = sum of:
        0.13763043 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 3238) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13763043 = score(doc=3238,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.22233479 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048113182 = queryNorm
            0.6190234 = fieldWeight in 3238, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3238)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(4/6)
    Abstract
    Nach mehr als 15 Jahren kontinuierlicher Fortschreibung wurde der Standard-Thesaurus Wirtschaft (STW) für die im Sommer 2015 erschienene Version 9.0 Fachgebiet für Fachgebiet von Grund auf überarbeitet. In diesem mehrjährigen Prozess wurden über 750 Thesaurusbegriffe neu aufgenommen, fast 1100 (von ungefähr 6000) wurden stillgelegt. Ähnlich tiefgreifend waren die Eingriffe in das Zugangsvokabular, und auch die systematische Struktur wurde angepasst. Vor diesem Hintergrund wird reflektiert, wie sich Umbrüche im Fachgebiet in dessen Vokabular widerspiegeln, welche Anforderungen dies an die Pflegesoftware stellt und wie solche Änderungen in einer verlinkten Welt publiziert und verfolgt werden können.
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 67(2016) H.4, S.217-240
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  8. Dextre Clarke, S.G.; Vernau, J.: ¬The thesaurus debate continues : guest editorial (2016) 0.15 
    0.15455438 = product of:
  0.23183157 = sum of:
    0.020890193 = weight(_text_:und in 2822) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020890193 = score(doc=2822,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10663647 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048113182 = queryNorm
        0.19590102 = fieldWeight in 2822, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2822)
    0.099681616 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 2822) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.099681616 = score(doc=2822,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23293893 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048113182 = queryNorm
        0.42793027 = fieldWeight in 2822, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2822)
    0.032613806 = weight(_text_:des in 2822) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.032613806 = score(doc=2822,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13324021 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048113182 = queryNorm
        0.24477452 = fieldWeight in 2822, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2822)
    0.07864596 = product of:
      0.15729192 = sum of:
        0.15729192 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 2822) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15729192 = score(doc=2822,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.22233479 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048113182 = queryNorm
            0.7074553 = fieldWeight in 2822, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2822)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(4/6)
    Content
    Einführung in ein Special issue: The Great Debate: "This House Believes that the Traditional Thesaurus has no Place in Modern Information Retrieval." [19 February 2015, 14:00-17:30 preceded by ISKO UK AGM and followed by networking, wine and nibbles; vgl.: http://www.iskouk.org/content/great-debate].
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  9. Dextre Clarke, S.G.; Vernau, J.: Questions and answers on current developments inspired by the thesaurus tradition : points of view (2016) 0.15 
    0.15455438 = product of:
  0.23183157 = sum of:
    0.020890193 = weight(_text_:und in 2914) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020890193 = score(doc=2914,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10663647 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048113182 = queryNorm
        0.19590102 = fieldWeight in 2914, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2914)
    0.099681616 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 2914) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.099681616 = score(doc=2914,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23293893 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048113182 = queryNorm
        0.42793027 = fieldWeight in 2914, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2914)
    0.032613806 = weight(_text_:des in 2914) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.032613806 = score(doc=2914,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13324021 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048113182 = queryNorm
        0.24477452 = fieldWeight in 2914, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2914)
    0.07864596 = product of:
      0.15729192 = sum of:
        0.15729192 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 2914) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15729192 = score(doc=2914,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.22233479 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048113182 = queryNorm
            0.7074553 = fieldWeight in 2914, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2914)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(4/6)
    Content
    Resumee zu einem Special issue: The Great Debate: "This House Believes that the Traditional Thesaurus has no Place in Modern Information Retrieval." [19 February 2015, 14:00-17:30 preceded by ISKO UK AGM and followed by networking, wine and nibbles; vgl.: http://www.iskouk.org/content/great-debate].
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  10. Siebenkäs, A.; Markscheffel, B.: Conception of a workflow for the semi-automatic construction of a thesaurus for the German printing industry (2015) 0.15 
    0.1542379 = product of:
  0.23135683 = sum of:
    0.01827892 = weight(_text_:und in 2091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01827892 = score(doc=2091,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10663647 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048113182 = queryNorm
        0.17141339 = fieldWeight in 2091, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2091)
    0.087221414 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 2091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.087221414 = score(doc=2091,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23293893 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048113182 = queryNorm
        0.37443897 = fieldWeight in 2091, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2091)
    0.028537082 = weight(_text_:des in 2091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028537082 = score(doc=2091,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13324021 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048113182 = queryNorm
        0.2141777 = fieldWeight in 2091, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2091)
    0.0973194 = product of:
      0.1946388 = sum of:
        0.1946388 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 2091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1946388 = score(doc=2091,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.22233479 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048113182 = queryNorm
            0.8754312 = fieldWeight in 2091, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2091)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(4/6)
    Abstract
    During the BMWI granted project "Print-IT", the need of a thesaurus based uniform and consistent language for the German printing industry became evident. In this paper we introduce a semi-automatic construction approach for such a thesaurus and present a workflow which supports users to generate thesaurus typical information structures from relevant digitalized resources with the help of common IT-tools.
    Object
    MIDOS Thesaurus
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  11. Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen : Nachhaltigkeit, Verfügbarkeit, semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008 (2010) 0.15 
    0.15126805 = product of:
  0.22690207 = sum of:
    0.043066233 = weight(_text_:und in 774) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.043066233 = score(doc=774,freq=34.0), product of:
        0.10663647 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048113182 = queryNorm
        0.40386027 = fieldWeight in 774, product of:
          5.8309517 = tf(freq=34.0), with freq of:
            34.0 = termFreq=34.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=774)
    0.07048555 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 774) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07048555 = score(doc=774,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.23293893 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048113182 = queryNorm
        0.3025924 = fieldWeight in 774, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=774)
    0.023061445 = weight(_text_:des in 774) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023061445 = score(doc=774,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.13324021 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048113182 = queryNorm
        0.17308173 = fieldWeight in 774, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=774)
    0.09028884 = sum of:
      0.064214155 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 774) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.064214155 = score(doc=774,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.22233479 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
            0.048113182 = queryNorm
          0.2888174 = fieldWeight in 774, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=774)
      0.026074687 = weight(_text_:22 in 774) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.026074687 = score(doc=774,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16848417 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.048113182 = queryNorm
          0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 774, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=774)
  0.6666667 = coord(4/6)
    Abstract
    In diesem Band 11 der Reihe Fortschritte der Wissensorganisation mit dem Titel Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen sind Beiträge enthalten, die auf die Vorträge der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der International Society of Knowledge Organnation 2008 in Konstanz zurückgehen. Diese Texte mußten nur in einigen Fällen aktualisiert werden, was für die damalige wie heutige Aktualität und Relevanz spricht. Manche damals neuen Ansätze sind gar inzwischen zum gängigen Standard geworden.
    Content
    Inhalt: A. Grundsätzliche Fragen (aus dem Umfeld) der Wissensorganisation Markus Gottwald, Matthias Klemm und Jan Weyand: Warum ist es schwierig, Wissen zu managen? Ein soziologischer Deutungsversuch anhand eines Wissensmanagementprojekts in einem Großunternehmen H. Peter Ohly: Wissenskommunikation und -organisation. Quo vadis? Helmut F. Spinner: Wissenspartizipation und Wissenschaftskommunikation in drei Wissensräumen: Entwurf einer integrierten Theorie B. Dokumentationssprachen in der Anwendung Felix Boteram: Semantische Relationen in Dokumentationssprachen vom Thesaurus zum semantischen Netz Jessica Hubrich: Multilinguale Wissensorganisation im Zeitalter der Globalisierung: das Projekt CrissCross Vivien Petras: Heterogenitätsbehandlung und Terminology Mapping durch Crosskonkordanzen - eine Fallstudie Manfred Hauer, Uwe Leissing und Karl Rädler: Query-Expansion durch Fachthesauri Erfahrungsbericht zu dandelon.com, Vorarlberger Parlamentsinformationssystem und vorarlberg.at
    C. Begriffsarbeit in der Wissensorganisation Ingetraut Dahlberg: Begriffsarbeit in der Wissensorganisation Claudio Gnoli, Gabriele Merli, Gianni Pavan, Elisabetta Bernuzzi, and Marco Priano: Freely faceted classification for a Web-based bibliographic archive The BioAcoustic Reference Database Stefan Hauser: Terminologiearbeit im Bereich Wissensorganisation - Vergleich dreier Publikationen anhand der Darstellung des Themenkomplexes Thesaurus Daniel Kless: Erstellung eines allgemeinen Standards zur Wissensorganisation: Nutzen, Möglichkeiten, Herausforderungen, Wege D. Kommunikation und Lernen Gerald Beck und Simon Meissner: Strukturierung und Vermittlung von heterogenen (Nicht-)Wissensbeständen in der Risikokommunikation Angelo Chianese, Francesca Cantone, Mario Caropreso, and Vincenzo Moscato: ARCHAEOLOGY 2.0: Cultural E-Learning tools and distributed repositories supported by SEMANTICA, a System for Learning Object Retrieval and Adaptive Courseware Generation for e-learning environments Sonja Hierl, Lydia Bauer, Nadja Böller und Josef Herget: Kollaborative Konzeption von Ontologien in der Hochschullehre: Theorie, Chancen und mögliche Umsetzung Marc Wilhelm Küster, Christoph Ludwig, Yahya Al-Haff und Andreas Aschenbrenner: TextGrid: eScholarship und der Fortschritt der Wissenschaft durch vernetzte Angebote
    E. Metadaten und Ontologien Thomas Baker: Dublin Core Application Profiles: current approaches Georg Hohmann: Die Anwendung des CIDOC für die semantische Wissensrepräsentation in den Kulturwissenschaften Elena Semenova: Ontologie als Begriffssystem. Theoretische Überlegungen und ihre praktische Umsetzung bei der Entwicklung einer Ontologie der Wissenschaftsdisziplinen F. Repositorien und Ressourcen Christiane Hümmer: TELOTA - Aspekte eines Wissensportals für geisteswissenschaftliche Forschung Philipp Scham: Integration von Open-Access-Repositorien in Fachportale Benjamin Zapilko: Dynamisches Browsing im Kontext von Informationsarchitekturen
  12. Maculan, B.C.M. dos; Lima, G.A. de; Oliveira, E.D.: Conversion methods from thesaurus to ontologies : a review (2016) 0.15 
    0.15070185 = product of:
  0.22605278 = sum of:
    0.029543195 = weight(_text_:und in 4695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029543195 = score(doc=4695,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.10663647 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048113182 = queryNorm
        0.27704588 = fieldWeight in 4695, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4695)
    0.099681616 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 4695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.099681616 = score(doc=4695,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23293893 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048113182 = queryNorm
        0.42793027 = fieldWeight in 4695, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4695)
    0.032613806 = weight(_text_:des in 4695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.032613806 = score(doc=4695,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13324021 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048113182 = queryNorm
        0.24477452 = fieldWeight in 4695, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4695)
    0.064214155 = product of:
      0.12842831 = sum of:
        0.12842831 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 4695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12842831 = score(doc=4695,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.22233479 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048113182 = queryNorm
            0.5776348 = fieldWeight in 4695, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4695)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(4/6)
    Footnote
    Vgl.: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/357053013_Conversion_Methods_from_Thesaurus_to_Ontologies_A_Review und DOI: 10.5771/9783956504389-300.
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  13. Scheven, E.: ¬Die neue Thesaurusnorm ISO 25964 und die GND (2017) 0.15 
    0.14743575 = product of:
  0.22115362 = sum of:
    0.044774026 = weight(_text_:und in 3505) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.044774026 = score(doc=3505,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.10663647 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048113182 = queryNorm
        0.41987535 = fieldWeight in 3505, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3505)
    0.087221414 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 3505) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.087221414 = score(doc=3505,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23293893 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048113182 = queryNorm
        0.37443897 = fieldWeight in 3505, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3505)
    0.04942768 = weight(_text_:des in 3505) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04942768 = score(doc=3505,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.13324021 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048113182 = queryNorm
        0.3709667 = fieldWeight in 3505, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3505)
    0.03973048 = product of:
      0.07946096 = sum of:
        0.07946096 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 3505) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07946096 = score(doc=3505,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22233479 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048113182 = queryNorm
            0.3573933 = fieldWeight in 3505, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3505)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(4/6)
    Source
    Theorie, Semantik und Organisation von Wissen: Proceedings der 13. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und dem 13. Internationalen Symposium der Informationswissenschaft der Higher Education Association for Information Science (HI) Potsdam (19.-20.03.2013): 'Theory, Information and Organization of Knowledge' / Proceedings der 14. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und Natural Language & Information Systems (NLDB) Passau (16.06.2015): 'Lexical Resources for Knowledge Organization' / Proceedings des Workshops der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) auf der SEMANTICS Leipzig (1.09.2014): 'Knowledge Organization and Semantic Web' / Proceedings des Workshops der Polnischen und Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) Cottbus (29.-30.09.2011): 'Economics of Knowledge Production and Organization'. Hrsg. von W. Babik, H.P. Ohly u. K. Weber
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  14. Garcla-Marco, F.J.: Teaching thesaurus construction : a top-down approach for LIS undergraduate programmes (2016) 0.14 
    0.14493318 = product of:
  0.21739976 = sum of:
    0.020890193 = weight(_text_:und in 4958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020890193 = score(doc=4958,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10663647 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048113182 = queryNorm
        0.19590102 = fieldWeight in 4958, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4958)
    0.099681616 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 4958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.099681616 = score(doc=4958,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23293893 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048113182 = queryNorm
        0.42793027 = fieldWeight in 4958, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4958)
    0.032613806 = weight(_text_:des in 4958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.032613806 = score(doc=4958,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13324021 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048113182 = queryNorm
        0.24477452 = fieldWeight in 4958, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4958)
    0.064214155 = product of:
      0.12842831 = sum of:
        0.12842831 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 4958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12842831 = score(doc=4958,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.22233479 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048113182 = queryNorm
            0.5776348 = fieldWeight in 4958, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4958)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(4/6)
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  15. Zapilko, B.; Sure, Y.: Neue Möglichkeiten für die Wissensorganisation durch die Kombination von Digital Library Verfahren mit Standards des Semantic Web (2013) 0.14 
    0.13818805 = product of:
  0.20728207 = sum of:
    0.049545445 = weight(_text_:und in 936) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.049545445 = score(doc=936,freq=20.0), product of:
        0.10663647 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048113182 = queryNorm
        0.46462005 = fieldWeight in 936, product of:
          4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
            20.0 = termFreq=20.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=936)
    0.07476121 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 936) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07476121 = score(doc=936,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23293893 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048113182 = queryNorm
        0.3209477 = fieldWeight in 936, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=936)
    0.048920713 = weight(_text_:des in 936) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.048920713 = score(doc=936,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.13324021 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048113182 = queryNorm
        0.36716178 = fieldWeight in 936, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=936)
    0.0340547 = product of:
      0.0681094 = sum of:
        0.0681094 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 936) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0681094 = score(doc=936,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22233479 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048113182 = queryNorm
            0.30633712 = fieldWeight in 936, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=936)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(4/6)
    Abstract
    Entwicklungen und Technologien des Semantic Web treffen seit einigen Jahren verstärkt auf die Bibliotheks- und Dokumentationswelt, um das dort seit Jahrzehnten gesammelte und gepflegte Wissen für das Web und seine Nurzer zugänglich und weiter verarbeitbar zu machen. Dabei können beide Lager von einer Öffnung gegenüber den Verfahren des jeweils anderen und den daraus resultierenden Möglichkeiten, beispielsweise einer integrierten Recherche in verteilten und semantisch angereicherten Dokumentbeständen oder der Anreicherung eigener Bestände um Inhalte anderer, frei verfügbarer Bestände, profitieren. Dieses Paper stellt die Reformulierung eines gängigen informationswissenschaftlichen Verfahrens aus der Dokumentations- und Bibliothekswelt, des sogenannten SchalenmodeIls, vor und zeigt neues Potenzial und neue Möglichkeiten für die Wissensorganisation auf, die durch dessen Anwendung im Semantic Web entstehen können. Darüber hinaus werden erste praktische Ergebnisse der Vorarbeiten dieser Reformulierung präsentiert, die Transformation eines Thesaurus ins SKOS-Format.
  16. Kempf, A.O.; Zapilko, B.: Normdatenpflege in Zeiten der Automatisierung : Erstellung und Evaluation automatisch aufgebauter Thesaurus-Crosskonkordanzen (2013) 0.14 
    0.13755411 = product of:
  0.27510822 = sum of:
    0.03133529 = weight(_text_:und in 1021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03133529 = score(doc=1021,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.10663647 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048113182 = queryNorm
        0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 1021, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1021)
    0.024460357 = weight(_text_:des in 1021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024460357 = score(doc=1021,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13324021 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048113182 = queryNorm
        0.18358089 = fieldWeight in 1021, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1021)
    0.21931256 = sum of:
      0.18020053 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 1021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.18020053 = score(doc=1021,freq=14.0), product of:
          0.22233479 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
            0.048113182 = queryNorm
          0.81049186 = fieldWeight in 1021, product of:
            3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
              14.0 = termFreq=14.0
            4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1021)
      0.03911203 = weight(_text_:22 in 1021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03911203 = score(doc=1021,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16848417 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.048113182 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1021, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1021)
  0.5 = coord(3/6)
    Abstract
    Thesaurus-Crosskonkordanzen bilden eine wichtige Voraussetzung für die integrierte Suche in einer verteilten Datenstruktur. Ihr Aufbau erfordert allerdings erhebliche personelle Ressourcen. Der vorliegende Beitrag liefert Evaluationsergebnisse des Library Track 2012 der Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative (OAEI), in dem Crosskonkordanzen zwischen dem Thesaurus Sozialwissenschaften (TheSoz) und dem Standard Thesaurus Wirtschaft (STW) erstmals automatisch erstellt wurden. Die Evaluation weist auf deutliche Unterschiede in den getesteten Matching- Tools hin und stellt die qualitativen Unterschiede einer automatisch im Vergleich zu einer intellektuell erstellten Crosskonkordanz heraus. Die Ergebnisse sprechen für einen Einsatz automatisch generierter Thesaurus-Crosskonkordanzen, um Domänenexperten eine maschinell erzeugte Vorselektion von möglichen Äquivalenzrelationen anzubieten.
    Date
    18. 8.2013 12:53:22
    Object
    Thesaurus Sozialwissenschaften
    Standard Thesaurus Wirtschaft
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 64(2013) H.4, S.199-208
  17. Busch, D.: Organisation eines Thesaurus für die Unterstützung der mehrsprachigen Suche in einer bibliographischen Datenbank im Bereich Planen und Bauen (2016) 0.14 
    0.13692033 = product of:
  0.2053805 = sum of:
    0.03916911 = weight(_text_:und in 3308) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03916911 = score(doc=3308,freq=18.0), product of:
        0.10663647 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048113182 = queryNorm
        0.3673144 = fieldWeight in 3308, product of:
          4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
            18.0 = termFreq=18.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3308)
    0.06230101 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 3308) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06230101 = score(doc=3308,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23293893 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048113182 = queryNorm
        0.2674564 = fieldWeight in 3308, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3308)
    0.028826807 = weight(_text_:des in 3308) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028826807 = score(doc=3308,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.13324021 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048113182 = queryNorm
        0.21635216 = fieldWeight in 3308, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3308)
    0.07508356 = product of:
      0.15016712 = sum of:
        0.15016712 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 3308) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15016712 = score(doc=3308,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.22233479 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048113182 = queryNorm
            0.6754099 = fieldWeight in 3308, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3308)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(4/6)
    Abstract
    Das Problem der mehrsprachigen Suche gewinnt in der letzten Zeit immer mehr an Bedeutung, da viele nützliche Fachinformationen in der Welt in verschiedenen Sprachen publiziert werden. RSWBPlus ist eine bibliographische Datenbank zum Nachweis der Fachliteratur im Bereich Planen und Bauen, welche deutsch- und englischsprachige Metadaten-Einträge enthält. Bis vor Kurzem war es problematisch Einträge zu finden, deren Sprache sich von der Anfragesprache unterschied. Zum Beispiel fand man auf deutschsprachige Anfragen nur deutschsprachige Einträge, obwohl die Datenbank auch potenziell nützliche englischsprachige Einträge enthielt. Um das Problem zu lösen, wurde nach einer Untersuchung bestehender Ansätze, die RSWBPlus weiterentwickelt, um eine mehrsprachige (sprachübergreifende) Suche zu unterstützen, welche unter Einbeziehung eines zweisprachigen begriffbasierten Thesaurus erfolgt. Der Thesaurus wurde aus bereits bestehenden Thesauri automatisch gebildet. Die Einträge der Quell-Thesauri wurden in SKOS-Format (Simple Knowledge Organisation System) umgewandelt, automatisch miteinander vereinigt und schließlich in einen Ziel-Thesaurus eingespielt, der ebenfalls in SKOS geführt wird. Für den Zugriff zum Ziel-Thesaurus werden Apache Jena und MS SQL Server verwendet. Bei der mehrsprachigen Suche werden Terme der Anfrage durch entsprechende Übersetzungen und Synonyme in Deutsch und Englisch erweitert. Die Erweiterung der Suchterme kann sowohl in der Laufzeit, als auch halbautomatisch erfolgen. Das verbesserte Recherchesystem kann insbesondere deutschsprachigen Benutzern helfen, relevante englischsprachige Einträge zu finden. Die Verwendung vom SKOS erhöht die Interoperabilität der Thesauri, vereinfacht das Bilden des Ziel-Thesaurus und den Zugriff zu seinen Einträgen.
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  18. Shiri, A.: Powering search : the role of thesauri in new information environments (2012) 0.14 
    0.13665967 = product of:
  0.2049895 = sum of:
    0.015667645 = weight(_text_:und in 1322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015667645 = score(doc=1322,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10663647 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048113182 = queryNorm
        0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 1322, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1322)
    0.07476121 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 1322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07476121 = score(doc=1322,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23293893 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048113182 = queryNorm
        0.3209477 = fieldWeight in 1322, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1322)
    0.024460357 = weight(_text_:des in 1322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024460357 = score(doc=1322,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13324021 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048113182 = queryNorm
        0.18358089 = fieldWeight in 1322, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1322)
    0.090100266 = product of:
      0.18020053 = sum of:
        0.18020053 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 1322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18020053 = score(doc=1322,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.22233479 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048113182 = queryNorm
            0.81049186 = fieldWeight in 1322, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1322)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(4/6)
    Content
    Thesauri : introduction and recent developments -- Thesauri in interactive information retrieval -- User-centered approach to the evaluation of thesauri : query formulation and expansion -- Thesauri in web-based search systems -- Thesaurus-based search and browsing functionalities in new thesaurus construction standards -- Design of search user interfaces for thesauri -- Design of user interfaces for multilingual and meta-thesauri -- User-centered evaluation of thesaurus-enhanced search user interfaces -- Guidelines for the design of thesaurus-enhanced search user interfaces -- Current trends and developments.
    RSWK
    Thesaurus
    Subject
    Thesaurus
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  19. Youlin, Z.; Baptista Nunes, J.M.; Zhonghua, D.: Construction and evolution of a Chinese Information Science and Information Service (CIS&IS) onto-thesaurus (2014) 0.14 
    0.13665967 = product of:
  0.2049895 = sum of:
    0.015667645 = weight(_text_:und in 1376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015667645 = score(doc=1376,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10663647 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048113182 = queryNorm
        0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 1376, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1376)
    0.07476121 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 1376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07476121 = score(doc=1376,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23293893 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048113182 = queryNorm
        0.3209477 = fieldWeight in 1376, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1376)
    0.024460357 = weight(_text_:des in 1376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024460357 = score(doc=1376,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13324021 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048113182 = queryNorm
        0.18358089 = fieldWeight in 1376, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1376)
    0.090100266 = product of:
      0.18020053 = sum of:
        0.18020053 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 1376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18020053 = score(doc=1376,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.22233479 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048113182 = queryNorm
            0.81049186 = fieldWeight in 1376, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1376)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(4/6)
    Abstract
    Thesauri are the most important tools for information and knowledge organization, and they undergo regular improvements according to the rapid development of new requirements and affordances of emerging information techniques. This paper attempts to integrate ontology into the conceptual organization scheme of thesauri and proposes a new solution to extend the functionality of thesauri based on ontological features, which is termed here as an onto-thesaurus. In this study, a prototype system named the Chinese Information Science and Information Service onto-thesaurus system (CIS&IS), was developed to analyze ontothesaurus with the category of information science and information service in the Chinese Topic Classification Dictionary with a two-stage approach. The first stage aims to define and construct the onto-thesaurus. The second stage aims to realize the evolution function of onto-thesaurus. The main purpose of this system was to achieve the function of self-learning and auto-evolution and to enable a much more effective conceptual retrieval by the newly proposed onto-thesaurus.
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  20. Dextre Clarke, S.G.: ¬The Information Retrieval Thesaurus (2019) 0.14 
    0.13665967 = product of:
  0.2049895 = sum of:
    0.015667645 = weight(_text_:und in 5210) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015667645 = score(doc=5210,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10663647 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048113182 = queryNorm
        0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 5210, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5210)
    0.07476121 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 5210) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07476121 = score(doc=5210,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23293893 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048113182 = queryNorm
        0.3209477 = fieldWeight in 5210, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5210)
    0.024460357 = weight(_text_:des in 5210) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024460357 = score(doc=5210,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13324021 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048113182 = queryNorm
        0.18358089 = fieldWeight in 5210, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5210)
    0.090100266 = product of:
      0.18020053 = sum of:
        0.18020053 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 5210) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18020053 = score(doc=5210,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.22233479 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048113182 = queryNorm
            0.81049186 = fieldWeight in 5210, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5210)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(4/6)
    Abstract
    In the post-war period before computers were readily available, urgent demand for scientific and industrial develop-ment stimulated research and development (R&D) that led to the birth of the information retrieval thesaurus. This article traces the early history, speciation and progressive improvement of the thesaurus to reach the state now conveyed by guidelines in inter-national and national standards. Despite doubts about the effec-tiveness of the thesaurus throughout this period, and notwith-standing the dominance of Google and other search engines in the information retrieval (IR) scene today, the thesaurus still plays a complementary part in the organization of knowledge and in-formation resources. Success today depends on interoperability, and is opening up opportunities in linked data applications. At the same time, the IR demand from workers in the knowledge society drives interest in hybrid forms of knowledge organization system (KOS) that may pool the genes of thesauri with those of ontologies and classification schemes.
    Object
    Information Retrieval Thesaurus
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus

Authors

Languages

  • d 1668
  • e 782
  • a 2
  • f 1
  • hu 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 1930
  • el 448
  • m 309
  • x 82
  • s 74
  • r 28
  • n 9
  • b 6
  • i 3
  • p 2
  • v 2
  • l 1
  • ms 1
  • z 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications