Search (1732 results, page 1 of 87)

0.19584131 = sum of:
  0.16022804 = product of:
    0.48068413 = sum of:
      0.48068413 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.48068413 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.5131694 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.060529456 = queryNorm
          0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.03561327 = product of:
    0.07122654 = sum of:
      0.07122654 = weight(_text_:web in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07122654 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19753851 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
            0.060529456 = queryNorm
          0.36057037 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja

0.1717619 = sum of:
  0.06449698 = product of:
    0.19349092 = sum of:
      0.19349092 = weight(_text_:themes in 4309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.19349092 = score(doc=4309,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.3891456 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
            0.060529456 = queryNorm
          0.49721986 = fieldWeight in 4309, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4309)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.10726491 = sum of:
    0.049858574 = weight(_text_:web in 4309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.049858574 = score(doc=4309,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19753851 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.060529456 = queryNorm
        0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 4309, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4309)
    0.05740634 = weight(_text_:22 in 4309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05740634 = score(doc=4309,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21196385 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.060529456 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4309, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4309)

Abstract

This paper surveys library literature on cataloging and classification published in 2007-8, indicating its extent and range in terms of types of literature, major subject areas, and themes. The paper reviews pertinent literature in the following areas: the future of bibliographic control, general cataloging standards and texts, Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR), cataloging varied resources, metadata and cataloging in the Web world, classification and subject access, questions of diversity and diverse perspectives, additional reports of practice and research, catalogers' education and careers, keeping current through columns and blogs, and cataloging history.

Date

10. 9.2000 17:38:22

0.13516895 = sum of:
  0.11056624 = product of:
    0.33169872 = sum of:
      0.33169872 = weight(_text_:themes in 4152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.33169872 = score(doc=4152,freq=8.0), product of:
          0.3891456 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
            0.060529456 = queryNorm
          0.8523769 = fieldWeight in 4152, product of:
            2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
              8.0 = termFreq=8.0
            6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4152)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.024602717 = product of:
    0.049205434 = sum of:
      0.049205434 = weight(_text_:22 in 4152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.049205434 = score(doc=4152,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21196385 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.060529456 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4152, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4152)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This is the fourth in a series of papers on classification based on phenomena instead of disciplines. Together with types, levels and facets that have been discussed in the previous parts, themes and rhemes are further structural components of such a classification. In a statement or in a longer document, a base theme and several particular themes can be identified. Base theme should be cited first in a classmark, followed by particular themes, each with its own facets. In some cases, rhemes can also be expressed, that is new information provided about a theme, converting an abstract statement ("wolves, affected by cervids") into a claim that some thing actually occurs ("wolves are affected by cervids"). In the Integrative Levels Classification rhemes can be expressed by special deictic classes, including those for actual specimens, anaphoras, unknown values, conjunctions and spans, whole universe, anthropocentric favoured classes, and favoured host classes. These features, together with rules for pronounciation, make a classification of phenomena a true language, that may be suitable for many uses.

Date

17. 2.2018 18:22:25

0.122687064 = sum of:
  0.046069264 = product of:
    0.1382078 = sum of:
      0.1382078 = weight(_text_:themes in 1374) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.1382078 = score(doc=1374,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.3891456 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
            0.060529456 = queryNorm
          0.35515702 = fieldWeight in 1374, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1374)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.0766178 = sum of:
    0.03561327 = weight(_text_:web in 1374) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03561327 = score(doc=1374,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19753851 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.060529456 = queryNorm
        0.18028519 = fieldWeight in 1374, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1374)
    0.04100453 = weight(_text_:22 in 1374) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04100453 = score(doc=1374,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21196385 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.060529456 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1374, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1374)

Abstract

This paper presents the final phase of a research project that aims to develop a bilingual taxonomy (English and French) for the indexing of ordinary digital images. The objective of this last stage was to ask a representative sample of image searchers to complete retrieval tasks of images indexed using the new taxonomy TIIARA to measure its degree of effectiveness and efficiency. During this experiment, a sample of 60 participants were asked to indicate where in the taxonomic structure they thought they would find each one of the 30 images shown. Respondents also completed a questionnaire intended to obtain their general opinion on TIIARA and to report any difficulties encountered during the retrieval process. The quantitative data was analyzed according to statistical methods, while the content of the open-ended questions was analyzed and coded to identify emergent themes. The findings of this ultimate phase of the research project indicated that, despite the fact that some categories still need further refining, TIIARA already constitutes a successful tool that provides access to ordinary images. Furthermore, the bilingual taxonomy constitutes a definite benefit for image searchers who are not very familiar with images indexed in English, which is still the dominant language of the Web.

Date

3. 9.2014 19:22:07

0.11095601 = sum of:
  0.08011402 = product of:
    0.24034207 = sum of:
      0.24034207 = weight(_text_:3a in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.24034207 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.5131694 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.060529456 = queryNorm
          0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.030841993 = product of:
    0.061683986 = sum of:
      0.061683986 = weight(_text_:web in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.061683986 = score(doc=4997,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.19753851 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
            0.060529456 = queryNorm
          0.3122631 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

While classifications are heavily used to categorize web content, the evolution of the web foresees a more formal structure - ontology - which can serve this purpose. Ontologies are core artifacts of the Semantic Web which enable machines to use inference rules to conduct automated reasoning on data. Lightweight ontologies bridge the gap between classifications and ontologies. A lightweight ontology (LO) is an ontology representing a backbone taxonomy where the concept of the child node is more specific than the concept of the parent node. Formal lightweight ontologies can be generated from their informal ones. The key applications of formal lightweight ontologies are document classification, semantic search, and data integration. However, these applications suffer from the following problems: the disambiguation accuracy of the state of the art NLP tools used in generating formal lightweight ontologies from their informal ones; the lack of background knowledge needed for the formal lightweight ontologies; and the limitation of ontology reuse. In this dissertation, we propose a novel solution to these problems in formal lightweight ontologies; namely, faceted lightweight ontology (FLO). FLO is a lightweight ontology in which terms, present in each node label, and their concepts, are available in the background knowledge (BK), which is organized as a set of facets. A facet can be defined as a distinctive property of the groups of concepts that can help in differentiating one group from another. Background knowledge can be defined as a subset of a knowledge base, such as WordNet, and often represents a specific domain.

Content

PhD Dissertation at International Doctorate School in Information and Communication Technology. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fcore.ac.uk%2Fdownload%2Fpdf%2F150083013.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2n-qisNagpyT0lli_6QbAQ.

0.108096235 = sum of:
  0.03224849 = product of:
    0.09674546 = sum of:
      0.09674546 = weight(_text_:themes in 1155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.09674546 = score(doc=1155,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.3891456 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
            0.060529456 = queryNorm
          0.24860993 = fieldWeight in 1155, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
            0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1155)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.075847745 = sum of:
    0.035255335 = weight(_text_:web in 1155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.035255335 = score(doc=1155,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.19753851 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.060529456 = queryNorm
        0.17847323 = fieldWeight in 1155, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1155)
    0.040592413 = weight(_text_:22 in 1155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.040592413 = score(doc=1155,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.21196385 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.060529456 = queryNorm
        0.19150631 = fieldWeight in 1155, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1155)

Abstract

Metadata and semantics are integral to any information system and significant to the sphere of Web data. Research focusing on metadata and semantics is crucial for advancing our understanding and knowledge of metadata; and, more profoundly for being able to effectively discover, use, archive, and repurpose information. In response to this need, researchers are actively examining methods for generating, reusing, and interchanging metadata. Integrated with these developments is research on the application of computational methods, linked data, and data analytics. A growing body of work also targets conceptual and theoretical designs providing foundational frameworks for metadata and semantic applications. There is no doubt that metadata weaves its way into nearly every aspect of our information ecosystem, and there is great motivation for advancing the current state of metadata and semantics. To this end, it is vital that scholars and practitioners convene and share their work.
The MTSR 2013 program and the contents of these proceedings show a rich diversity of research and practices, drawing on problems from metadata and semantically focused tools and technologies, linked data, cross-language semantics, ontologies, metadata models, and semantic system and metadata standards. The general session of the conference included 18 papers covering a broad spectrum of topics, proving the interdisciplinary field of metadata, and was divided into three main themes: platforms for research data sets, system architecture and data management; metadata and ontology validation, evaluation, mapping and interoperability; and content management. Metadata as a research topic is maturing, and the conference also supported the following five tracks: Metadata and Semantics for Open Repositories, Research Information Systems and Data Infrastructures; Metadata and Semantics for Cultural Collections and Applications; Metadata and Semantics for Agriculture, Food and Environment; Big Data and Digital Libraries in Health, Science and Technology; and European and National Projects, and Project Networking. Each track had a rich selection of papers, giving broader diversity to MTSR, and enabling deeper exploration of significant topics.

Date

17.12.2013 12:51:22

Theme

Semantic Web

0.10726491 = product of:
  0.21452983 = sum of:
    0.21452983 = sum of:
      0.09971715 = weight(_text_:web in 8365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.09971715 = score(doc=8365,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19753851 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
            0.060529456 = queryNorm
          0.50479853 = fieldWeight in 8365, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
            0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8365)
      0.11481268 = weight(_text_:22 in 8365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11481268 = score(doc=8365,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21196385 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.060529456 = queryNorm
          0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 8365, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8365)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 6.2015 16:08:38

0.10306334 = sum of:
  0.05528312 = product of:
    0.16584936 = sum of:
      0.16584936 = weight(_text_:themes in 4772) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.16584936 = score(doc=4772,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.3891456 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
            0.060529456 = queryNorm
          0.42618844 = fieldWeight in 4772, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4772)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.047780216 = product of:
    0.09556043 = sum of:
      0.09556043 = weight(_text_:web in 4772) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.09556043 = score(doc=4772,freq=10.0), product of:
          0.19753851 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
            0.060529456 = queryNorm
          0.48375595 = fieldWeight in 4772, product of:
            3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
              10.0 = termFreq=10.0
            3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4772)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This article describes the outcomes of research that examined the practice of web information architecture (IA) in large organizations. Using a grounded theory approach, seven large organizations were investigated and the data were analyzed for emerging themes and concepts. The research finds that the practice of web IA is characterized by unpredictability, multiple perspectives, and a need for responsiveness, agility, and negotiation. This article claims that web IA occurs in a complex environment and has emergent, self-organizing properties. There is value in examining the practice as a complex adaptive system. Using this metaphor, a pre-determined, structured methodology that delivers a documented, enduring, information design for the web is found inadequate - dominant and traditional thinking and practice in the organization of information are challenged.

0.097920656 = sum of:
  0.08011402 = product of:
    0.24034207 = sum of:
      0.24034207 = weight(_text_:3a in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.24034207 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.5131694 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.060529456 = queryNorm
          0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.017806634 = product of:
    0.03561327 = sum of:
      0.03561327 = weight(_text_:web in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03561327 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19753851 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
            0.060529456 = queryNorm
          0.18028519 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

Vgl. unter: https://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwizweHljdbcAhVS16QKHXcFD9QQFjABegQICRAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Fpublication%2F271200105_Die_Autonomie_des_Menschen_und_der_Maschine_-_gegenwartige_Definitionen_von_Autonomie_zwischen_philosophischem_Hintergrund_und_technologischer_Umsetzbarkeit_Redigierte_Version_der_Magisterarbeit_Karls&usg=AOvVaw06orrdJmFF2xbCCp_hL26q.

0.096510574 = product of:
  0.19302115 = sum of:
    0.19302115 = sum of:
      0.1274139 = weight(_text_:web in 4331) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.1274139 = score(doc=4331,freq=10.0), product of:
          0.19753851 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
            0.060529456 = queryNorm
          0.6450079 = fieldWeight in 4331, product of:
            3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
              10.0 = termFreq=10.0
            3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4331)
      0.06560725 = weight(_text_:22 in 4331) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06560725 = score(doc=4331,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21196385 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.060529456 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4331, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4331)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Das Semantic Web - bzw. Linked Data - hat das Potenzial, die Verfügbarkeit von Daten und Wissen, sowie den Zugriff darauf zu revolutionieren. Einen großen Beitrag dazu können Wissensorganisationssysteme wie Thesauri leisten, die die Daten inhaltlich erschließen und strukturieren. Leider sind immer noch viele dieser Systeme lediglich in Buchform oder in speziellen Anwendungen verfügbar. Wie also lassen sie sich für das Semantic Web nutzen? Das Simple Knowledge Organization System (SKOS) bietet eine Möglichkeit, die Wissensorganisationssysteme in eine Form zu "übersetzen", die im Web zitiert und mit anderen Resourcen verknüpft werden kann.

Date

15. 3.2011 19:21:22

Theme

Semantic Web

0.09613682 = product of:
  0.19227365 = sum of:
    0.19227365 = product of:
      0.5768209 = sum of:
        0.5768209 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.5768209 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.5131694 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.060529456 = queryNorm
            1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.

0.09202725 = sum of:
  0.036855415 = product of:
    0.11056624 = sum of:
      0.11056624 = weight(_text_:themes in 4725) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11056624 = score(doc=4725,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.3891456 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
            0.060529456 = queryNorm
          0.28412563 = fieldWeight in 4725, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4725)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.055171836 = product of:
    0.11034367 = sum of:
      0.11034367 = weight(_text_:web in 4725) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11034367 = score(doc=4725,freq=30.0), product of:
          0.19753851 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
            0.060529456 = queryNorm
          0.5585932 = fieldWeight in 4725, product of:
            5.477226 = tf(freq=30.0), with freq of:
              30.0 = termFreq=30.0
            3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4725)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The World Wide Web has enabled the creation of a global information space comprising linked documents. As the Web becomes ever more enmeshed with our daily lives, there is a growing desire for direct access to raw data not currently available on the Web or bound up in hypertext documents. Linked Data provides a publishing paradigm in which not only documents, but also data, can be a first class citizen of the Web, thereby enabling the extension of the Web with a global data space based on open standards - the Web of Data. In this Synthesis lecture we provide readers with a detailed technical introduction to Linked Data. We begin by outlining the basic principles of Linked Data, including coverage of relevant aspects of Web architecture. The remainder of the text is based around two main themes - the publication and consumption of Linked Data. Drawing on a practical Linked Data scenario, we provide guidance and best practices on: architectural approaches to publishing Linked Data; choosing URIs and vocabularies to identify and describe resources; deciding what data to return in a description of a resource on the Web; methods and frameworks for automated linking of data sets; and testing and debugging approaches for Linked Data deployments. We give an overview of existing Linked Data applications and then examine the architectures that are used to consume Linked Data from the Web, alongside existing tools and frameworks that enable these. Readers can expect to gain a rich technical understanding of Linked Data fundamentals, as the basis for application development, research or further study.

Content

Inhalt: Introduction - Principles ofLinked Data - The Web ofData - Linked Data Design Considerations - Linked Data Design Considerations - Consuming Linked Data - Summary and Outlook Vgl.: http://linkeddatabook.com/book.

RSWK

Semantic Web / Forschungsergebnis / Forschung / Daten / Hyperlink

Series

Synthesis lectures on the semantic web: theory and technology ; 1

Subject

Semantic Web / Forschungsergebnis / Forschung / Daten / Hyperlink

Theme

Semantic Web

0.0913693 = product of:
  0.1827386 = sum of:
    0.1827386 = sum of:
      0.10072953 = weight(_text_:web in 2090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.10072953 = score(doc=2090,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.19753851 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
            0.060529456 = queryNorm
          0.5099235 = fieldWeight in 2090, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2090)
      0.08200906 = weight(_text_:22 in 2090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08200906 = score(doc=2090,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21196385 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.060529456 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2090, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2090)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou

Theme

Semantic Web

0.0887066 = product of:
  0.1774132 = sum of:
    0.1774132 = sum of:
      0.12820776 = weight(_text_:web in 4649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.12820776 = score(doc=4649,freq=18.0), product of:
          0.19753851 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
            0.060529456 = queryNorm
          0.64902663 = fieldWeight in 4649, product of:
            4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
              18.0 = termFreq=18.0
            3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4649)
      0.049205434 = weight(_text_:22 in 4649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.049205434 = score(doc=4649,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21196385 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.060529456 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4649, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4649)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

More and more cultural heritage institutions publish their collections, vocabularies and metadata on the Web. The resulting Web of linked cultural data opens up exciting new possibilities for searching and browsing through these cultural heritage collections. We report on ongoing work in which we investigate the estimation of relevance in this Web of Culture. We study existing measures of semantic distance and how they apply to two use cases. The use cases relate to the structured, multilingual and multimodal nature of the Culture Web. We distinguish between measures using the Web, such as Google distance and PMI, and measures using the Linked Data Web, i.e. the semantic structure of metadata vocabularies. We perform a small study in which we compare these semantic distance measures to human judgements of relevance. Although it is too early to draw any definitive conclusions, the study provides new insights into the applicability of semantic distance measures to the Web of Culture, and clear starting points for further research.

Date

26.12.2011 13:40:22

Theme

Semantic Web

0.08565405 = sum of:
  0.06515178 = product of:
    0.19545534 = sum of:
      0.19545534 = weight(_text_:themes in 4696) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.19545534 = score(doc=4696,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.3891456 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
            0.060529456 = queryNorm
          0.5022679 = fieldWeight in 4696, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4696)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.020502266 = product of:
    0.04100453 = sum of:
      0.04100453 = weight(_text_:22 in 4696) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04100453 = score(doc=4696,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21196385 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.060529456 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4696, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4696)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The 15th International ISKO Conference has been held in Porto (Portugal) under the topic Challenges and opportunities for KO in the digital age. ISKO has been organizing biennial international conferences since 1990, in order to promote a space for debate among Knowledge Organization (KO) scholars and practitioners all over the world. The topics under discussion in the 15th International ISKO Conference are intended to cover a wide range of issues that, in a very incisive way, constitute challenges, obstacles and questions in the field of KO, but also highlight ways and open innovative perspectives for this area in a world undergoing constant change, due to the digital revolution that unavoidably moulds our society. Accordingly, the three aggregating themes, chosen to fit the proposals for papers and posters to be submitted, are as follows: 1 - Foundations and methods for KO; 2 - Interoperability towards information access; 3 - Societal challenges in KO. In addition to these themes, the inaugural session includes a keynote speech by Prof. David Bawden of City University London, entitled Supporting truth and promoting understanding: knowledge organization and the curation of the infosphere.

Date

17. 1.2019 17:22:18

0.085501984 = sum of:
  0.05528312 = product of:
    0.16584936 = sum of:
      0.16584936 = weight(_text_:themes in 1507) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.16584936 = score(doc=1507,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.3891456 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
            0.060529456 = queryNorm
          0.42618844 = fieldWeight in 1507, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1507)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.030218858 = product of:
    0.060437717 = sum of:
      0.060437717 = weight(_text_:web in 1507) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.060437717 = score(doc=1507,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.19753851 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
            0.060529456 = queryNorm
          0.3059541 = fieldWeight in 1507, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1507)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Social media have transformed social interactions and now look set to transform workplace communications. In this exploratory study, we investigate how employees use and get value from a variety of social networking technologies. The context of this research is 4 software firms located in China. Notwithstanding differences in corporate attitudes toward social networking, we identify common themes in the way Web 2.0 technologies are leveraged as value is created by employees at all levels. We draw on the communication ecology framework to analyze the application of various technologies. We inductively develop 5 propositions that describe how social networking technologies contribute directly to horizontal and vertical communication in organizations, and ultimately to individual, team, and organizational performance. Implications for research and practice are discussed.

0.085040435 = product of:
  0.17008087 = sum of:
    0.17008087 = sum of:
      0.12087543 = weight(_text_:web in 2158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.12087543 = score(doc=2158,freq=16.0), product of:
          0.19753851 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
            0.060529456 = queryNorm
          0.6119082 = fieldWeight in 2158, product of:
            4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
              16.0 = termFreq=16.0
            3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2158)
      0.049205434 = weight(_text_:22 in 2158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.049205434 = score(doc=2158,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21196385 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.060529456 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2158, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2158)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This paper introduces a project to develop a reliable, cost-effective method for classifying Internet texts into register categories, and apply that approach to the analysis of a large corpus of web documents. To date, the project has proceeded in 2 key phases. First, we developed a bottom-up method for web register classification, asking end users of the web to utilize a decision-tree survey to code relevant situational characteristics of web documents, resulting in a bottom-up identification of register and subregister categories. We present details regarding the development and testing of this method through a series of 10 pilot studies. Then, in the second phase of our project we applied this procedure to a corpus of 53,000 web documents. An analysis of the results demonstrates the effectiveness of these methods for web register classification and provides a preliminary description of the types and distribution of registers on the web.

Date

4. 8.2015 19:22:04

0.082958415 = sum of:
  0.06515178 = product of:
    0.19545534 = sum of:
      0.19545534 = weight(_text_:themes in 1090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.19545534 = score(doc=1090,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.3891456 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
            0.060529456 = queryNorm
          0.5022679 = fieldWeight in 1090, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1090)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.017806634 = product of:
    0.03561327 = sum of:
      0.03561327 = weight(_text_:web in 1090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03561327 = score(doc=1090,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19753851 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
            0.060529456 = queryNorm
          0.18028519 = fieldWeight in 1090, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1090)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to visualize the history of evidence-based medicine (EBM) and to examine the characteristics of EBM development in China and the West. We searched the Web of Science and the Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure database for papers related to EBM. We applied information visualization techniques, citation analysis, cocitation analysis, cocitation cluster analysis, and network analysis to construct historiographies, themes networks, and chronological theme maps regarding EBM in China and the West. EBM appeared to develop in 4 stages: incubation (1972-1992 in the West vs. 1982-1999 in China), initiation (1992-1993 vs. 1999-2000), rapid development (1993-2000 vs. 2000-2004), and stable distribution (2000 onwards vs. 2004 onwards). Although there was a lag in EBM initiation in China compared with the West, the pace of development appeared similar. Our study shows that important differences exist in research themes, domain structures, and development depth, and in the speed of adoption between China and the West. In the West, efforts in EBM have shifted from education to practice, and from the quality of evidence to its translation. In China, there was a similar shift from education to practice, and from production of evidence to its translation. In addition, this concept has diffused to other healthcare areas, leading to the development of evidence-based traditional Chinese medicine, evidence-based nursing, and evidence-based policy making.

0.08113703 = product of:
  0.16227406 = sum of:
    0.16227406 = sum of:
      0.113068625 = weight(_text_:web in 987) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.113068625 = score(doc=987,freq=14.0), product of:
          0.19753851 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
            0.060529456 = queryNorm
          0.57238775 = fieldWeight in 987, product of:
            3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
              14.0 = termFreq=14.0
            3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=987)
      0.049205434 = weight(_text_:22 in 987) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.049205434 = score(doc=987,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21196385 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.060529456 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 987, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=987)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This book covers the basics of semantic web technologies and indexing languages, and describes their contribution to improve languages as a tool for subject queries and knowledge exploration. The book is relevant to information scientists, knowledge workers and indexers. It provides a suitable combination of theoretical foundations and practical applications.

Date

23. 7.2017 13:49:22

LCSH

Semantic Web
World Wide Web / Subject access

RSWK

Semantic Web

Subject

Semantic Web
World Wide Web / Subject access
Semantic Web

0.07988584 = sum of:
  0.05528312 = product of:
    0.16584936 = sum of:
      0.16584936 = weight(_text_:themes in 1414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.16584936 = score(doc=1414,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.3891456 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
            0.060529456 = queryNorm
          0.42618844 = fieldWeight in 1414, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1414)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.024602717 = product of:
    0.049205434 = sum of:
      0.049205434 = weight(_text_:22 in 1414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.049205434 = score(doc=1414,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21196385 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.060529456 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1414, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1414)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Marc Bloch's famous methodological essay, The Historian's Craft, contains many relevant considerations on knowledge organization. These have been selected and grouped into four main themes: terminology problems in history; principles for the organization of historical knowledge, with special reference to the genetic principle; sources of historical information, to be found not only in archives but also in very different media and contexts; and the nature and boundaries of history as a discipline. Analysis of them shows that knowledge organization is an important part of historians' work, and suggests that it can be especially fruitful when a cross-medial, interdisciplinary approach is adopted.

Source

Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik