Search (713 results, page 1 of 36)

0.14401974 = product of:
  0.8641184 = sum of:
    0.8641184 = weight(_text_:c3 in 2255) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.8641184 = score(doc=2255,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.47263274 = queryWeight, product of:
          9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048470292 = queryNorm
        1.8283083 = fieldWeight in 2255, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2255)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Content

Vortrag auf der Tagung "Geschichte und Modellierung", Jena, 3. Februar 2012. Vgl. unter: http://www.fmi.uni-jena.de/Fakult%C3%A4t/Institute+und+Abteilungen/Abteilung+f%C3%BCr+Didaktik/Kolloquien.html?highlight=neunzert.

0.1357831 = product of:
  0.8146986 = sum of:
    0.8146986 = weight(_text_:c3 in 4026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.8146986 = score(doc=4026,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.47263274 = queryWeight, product of:
          9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048470292 = queryNorm
        1.7237456 = fieldWeight in 4026, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4026)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Content

Vgl. unter: https://books.google.de/books?hl=de&lr=&id=0rtGDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA35&dq=inhaltserschlie%C3%9Fung+OR+sacherschlie%C3%9Fung&ots=5u0TwCbFqE&sig=GGw3Coc21CINkone-6Lx8LaSAjY#v=onepage&q=inhaltserschlie%C3%9Fung%20OR%20sacherschlie%C3%9Fung&f=false.

0.10167247 = product of:
  0.3050174 = sum of:
    0.26561508 = weight(_text_:themes in 4152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.26561508 = score(doc=4152,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.31161693 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048470292 = queryNorm
        0.8523769 = fieldWeight in 4152, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4152)
    0.039402332 = weight(_text_:22 in 4152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.039402332 = score(doc=4152,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1697347 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048470292 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4152, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4152)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Abstract

This is the fourth in a series of papers on classification based on phenomena instead of disciplines. Together with types, levels and facets that have been discussed in the previous parts, themes and rhemes are further structural components of such a classification. In a statement or in a longer document, a base theme and several particular themes can be identified. Base theme should be cited first in a classmark, followed by particular themes, each with its own facets. In some cases, rhemes can also be expressed, that is new information provided about a theme, converting an abstract statement ("wolves, affected by cervids") into a claim that some thing actually occurs ("wolves are affected by cervids"). In the Integrative Levels Classification rhemes can be expressed by special deictic classes, including those for actual specimens, anaphoras, unknown values, conjunctions and spans, whole universe, anthropocentric favoured classes, and favoured host classes. These features, together with rules for pronounciation, make a classification of phenomena a true language, that may be suitable for many uses.

Date

17. 2.2018 18:22:25

0.076983675 = product of:
  0.46190202 = sum of:
    0.46190202 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.46190202 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.41093168 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048470292 = queryNorm
        1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Content

Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.

0.066970505 = product of:
  0.2009115 = sum of:
    0.15494213 = weight(_text_:themes in 4309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15494213 = score(doc=4309,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.31161693 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048470292 = queryNorm
        0.49721986 = fieldWeight in 4309, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4309)
    0.045969386 = weight(_text_:22 in 4309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.045969386 = score(doc=4309,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1697347 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048470292 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4309, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4309)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Abstract

This paper surveys library literature on cataloging and classification published in 2007-8, indicating its extent and range in terms of types of literature, major subject areas, and themes. The paper reviews pertinent literature in the following areas: the future of bibliographic control, general cataloging standards and texts, Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR), cataloging varied resources, metadata and cataloging in the Web world, classification and subject access, questions of diversity and diverse perspectives, additional reports of practice and research, catalogers' education and careers, keeping current through columns and blogs, and cataloging history.

Date

10. 9.2000 17:38:22

0.06415306 = product of:
  0.38491836 = sum of:
    0.38491836 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.38491836 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.41093168 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048470292 = queryNorm
        0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Source

http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja

0.06311682 = product of:
  0.18935046 = sum of:
    0.15651518 = weight(_text_:themes in 4696) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15651518 = score(doc=4696,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.31161693 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048470292 = queryNorm
        0.5022679 = fieldWeight in 4696, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4696)
    0.03283528 = weight(_text_:22 in 4696) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03283528 = score(doc=4696,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1697347 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048470292 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4696, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4696)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Abstract

The 15th International ISKO Conference has been held in Porto (Portugal) under the topic Challenges and opportunities for KO in the digital age. ISKO has been organizing biennial international conferences since 1990, in order to promote a space for debate among Knowledge Organization (KO) scholars and practitioners all over the world. The topics under discussion in the 15th International ISKO Conference are intended to cover a wide range of issues that, in a very incisive way, constitute challenges, obstacles and questions in the field of KO, but also highlight ways and open innovative perspectives for this area in a world undergoing constant change, due to the digital revolution that unavoidably moulds our society. Accordingly, the three aggregating themes, chosen to fit the proposals for papers and posters to be submitted, are as follows: 1 - Foundations and methods for KO; 2 - Interoperability towards information access; 3 - Societal challenges in KO. In addition to these themes, the inaugural session includes a keynote speech by Prof. David Bawden of City University London, entitled Supporting truth and promoting understanding: knowledge organization and the curation of the infosphere.

Date

17. 1.2019 17:22:18

0.057403293 = product of:
  0.17220987 = sum of:
    0.13280754 = weight(_text_:themes in 1414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13280754 = score(doc=1414,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.31161693 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048470292 = queryNorm
        0.42618844 = fieldWeight in 1414, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1414)
    0.039402332 = weight(_text_:22 in 1414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.039402332 = score(doc=1414,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1697347 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048470292 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1414, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1414)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Abstract

Marc Bloch's famous methodological essay, The Historian's Craft, contains many relevant considerations on knowledge organization. These have been selected and grouped into four main themes: terminology problems in history; principles for the organization of historical knowledge, with special reference to the genetic principle; sources of historical information, to be found not only in archives but also in very different media and contexts; and the nature and boundaries of history as a discipline. Analysis of them shows that knowledge organization is an important part of historians' work, and suggests that it can be especially fruitful when a cross-medial, interdisciplinary approach is adopted.

Source

Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik

0.0487511 = product of:
  0.2925066 = sum of:
    0.2925066 = weight(_text_:achten in 4016) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2925066 = score(doc=4016,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.4005052 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.2629 = idf(docFreq=30, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048470292 = queryNorm
        0.7303441 = fieldWeight in 4016, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.2629 = idf(docFreq=30, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4016)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Abstract

In der vorgestellten Studie aus dem Bereich des interaktiven Information Retrieval wurde erstmals die Erwartungshaltung von Suchmaschinennutzern als mögliche Determinante der Benutzerzufriedenheit untersucht. Das experimentelle Untersuchungsdesign basiert auf einem betriebswirtschaftlichen Modell, das die Entstehung von Kundenzufriedenheit durch die Bestätigung bzw. Nicht-Bestätigung von Erwartungen erklärt. Ein zentrales Ergebnis dieser Studie ist, das bei der Messung von Benutzerzufriedenheit besonders auf den Messzeitpunkt zu achten ist. Des Weiteren konnte ein von der Systemgüte abhängiger Adaptionseffekt hinsichtlich der Relevanzbewertung der Benutzer nachgewiesen werden.

0.047836073 = product of:
  0.14350821 = sum of:
    0.110672936 = weight(_text_:themes in 4130) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.110672936 = score(doc=4130,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.31161693 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048470292 = queryNorm
        0.35515702 = fieldWeight in 4130, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4130)
    0.03283528 = weight(_text_:22 in 4130) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03283528 = score(doc=4130,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1697347 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048470292 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4130, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4130)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Abstract

The mapping of scientific fields, based on principles established in the seventies, has recently shown a remarkable development and applications are now booming with progress in computing efficiency. We examine here the convergence of two thematic mapping approaches, citation-based and word-based, which rely on quite different sociological backgrounds. A corpus in the nanoscience field was broken down into research themes, using the same clustering technique on the 2 networks separately. The tool for comparison is the table of intersections of the M clusters (here M=50) built on either side. A classical visual exploitation of such contingency tables is based on correspondence analysis. We investigate a rearrangement of the intersection table (block modeling), resulting in pseudo-map. The interest of this representation for confronting the two breakdowns is discussed. The amount of convergence found is, in our view, a strong argument in favor of the reliability of bibliometric mapping. However, the outcomes are not convergent at the degree where they can be substituted for each other. Differences highlight the complementarity between approaches based on different networks. In contrast with the strong informetric posture found in recent literature, where lexical and citation markers are considered as miscible tokens, the framework proposed here does not mix the two elements at an early stage, in compliance with their contrasted logic.

Date

8. 1.2011 18:22:50

0.047836073 = product of:
  0.14350821 = sum of:
    0.110672936 = weight(_text_:themes in 4147) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.110672936 = score(doc=4147,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.31161693 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048470292 = queryNorm
        0.35515702 = fieldWeight in 4147, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4147)
    0.03283528 = weight(_text_:22 in 4147) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03283528 = score(doc=4147,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1697347 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048470292 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4147, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4147)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Abstract

Purpose - This review aims to show, broadly, how the h-index has become a subject of widespread debate, how it has spawned many variants and diverse applications since first introduced in 2005 and some of the issues in its use. Design/methodology/approach - The review drew on a range of material published in 1990 or so sources published since 2005. From these sources, a number of themes were identified and discussed ranging from the h-index's advantages to which citation database might be selected for its calculation. Findings - The analysis shows how the h-index has quickly established itself as a major subject of interest in the field of bibliometrics. Study of the index ranges from its mathematical underpinning to a range of variants perceived to address the indexes' shortcomings. The review illustrates how widely the index has been applied but also how care must be taken in its application. Originality/value - The use of bibliometric indicators to measure research performance continues, with the h-index as its latest addition. The use of the h-index, its variants and many applications to which it has been put are still at the exploratory stage. The review shows the breadth and diversity of this research and the need to verify the veracity of the h-index by more studies.

Date

8. 1.2011 19:22:13

0.047836073 = product of:
  0.14350821 = sum of:
    0.110672936 = weight(_text_:themes in 1374) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.110672936 = score(doc=1374,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.31161693 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048470292 = queryNorm
        0.35515702 = fieldWeight in 1374, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1374)
    0.03283528 = weight(_text_:22 in 1374) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03283528 = score(doc=1374,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1697347 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048470292 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1374, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1374)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Abstract

This paper presents the final phase of a research project that aims to develop a bilingual taxonomy (English and French) for the indexing of ordinary digital images. The objective of this last stage was to ask a representative sample of image searchers to complete retrieval tasks of images indexed using the new taxonomy TIIARA to measure its degree of effectiveness and efficiency. During this experiment, a sample of 60 participants were asked to indicate where in the taxonomic structure they thought they would find each one of the 30 images shown. Respondents also completed a questionnaire intended to obtain their general opinion on TIIARA and to report any difficulties encountered during the retrieval process. The quantitative data was analyzed according to statistical methods, while the content of the open-ended questions was analyzed and coded to identify emergent themes. The findings of this ultimate phase of the research project indicated that, despite the fact that some categories still need further refining, TIIARA already constitutes a successful tool that provides access to ordinary images. Furthermore, the bilingual taxonomy constitutes a definite benefit for image searchers who are not very familiar with images indexed in English, which is still the dominant language of the Web.

Date

3. 9.2014 19:22:07

0.047836073 = product of:
  0.14350821 = sum of:
    0.110672936 = weight(_text_:themes in 1433) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.110672936 = score(doc=1433,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.31161693 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048470292 = queryNorm
        0.35515702 = fieldWeight in 1433, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1433)
    0.03283528 = weight(_text_:22 in 1433) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03283528 = score(doc=1433,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1697347 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048470292 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1433, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1433)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Abstract

A taxonomy is being developed to organize the content of a cultural heritage portal called Singapore Memory Portal, that provides access to a collection of memory postings about Singapore's history, culture, society, life/lifestyle and landscape/architecture. The taxonomy is divided into an upper-level taxonomy to support user browsing of topics, and a lower-level taxonomy to represent the types of information available on specific topics, to support user learning and information synthesis. The initial version of the upper-level taxonomy was developed based on potential users' expectations of the content coverage of the portal. The categories are centered on the themes of daily life/lifestyle, historically significant events, disasters and crises, festivals, a variety of cultural elements and national issues. The lower-level taxonomy was derived from attributes and relations extracted from essays and mindmaps produced by coders after reading memory postings for a sample of topics.

Source

Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik

0.047836073 = product of:
  0.14350821 = sum of:
    0.110672936 = weight(_text_:themes in 2637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.110672936 = score(doc=2637,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.31161693 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048470292 = queryNorm
        0.35515702 = fieldWeight in 2637, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2637)
    0.03283528 = weight(_text_:22 in 2637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03283528 = score(doc=2637,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1697347 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048470292 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2637, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2637)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Abstract

This article reports the findings of a qualitative research study that examined professional image users' knowledge of, and interest in using, content-based image retrieval (CBIR) systems in an attempt to clarify when and where CBIR methods might be applied. The research sought to determine the differences in the perceived usefulness of CBIR technologies among image user groups from several domains and explicate the reasons given regarding the utility of CBIR systems for their professional tasks. Twenty participants (archaeologists, architects, art historians, and artists), individuals who rely on images of cultural materials in the performance of their work, took part in the study. The findings of the study reveal that interest in CBIR methods varied among the different professional user communities. Individuals who showed an interest in these systems were primarily those concerned with the formal characteristics (i.e., color, shape, composition, and texture) of the images being sought. In contrast, those participants who expressed a strong interest in images of known items, images illustrating themes, and/or items from specific locations believe concept-based searches to be the most direct route. These image users did not see a practical application for CBIR systems in their current work routines.

Date

22. 1.2016 12:32:25

0.047836073 = product of:
  0.14350821 = sum of:
    0.110672936 = weight(_text_:themes in 3200) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.110672936 = score(doc=3200,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.31161693 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048470292 = queryNorm
        0.35515702 = fieldWeight in 3200, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3200)
    0.03283528 = weight(_text_:22 in 3200) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03283528 = score(doc=3200,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1697347 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048470292 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3200, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3200)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Abstract

This paper builds on the findings of a workshop held at the 2015 International Conference on Digital Preservation (iPRES), entitled, "Using Open-Source Tools to Fulfill Digital Preservation Requirements" (OSS4PRES hereafter). This day-long workshop brought together participants from across the library and archives community, including practitioners proprietary vendors, and representatives from open-source projects. The resulting conversations were surprisingly revealing: while OSS' significance within the preservation landscape was made clear, participants noted that there are a number of roadblocks that discourage or altogether prevent its use in many organizations. Overcoming these challenges will be necessary to further widespread, sustainable OSS adoption within the digital preservation community. This article will mine the rich discussions that took place at OSS4PRES to (1) summarize the workshop's key themes and major points of debate, (2) provide a comprehensive analysis of the opportunities, gaps, and challenges that using OSS entails at a philosophical, institutional, and individual level, and (3) offer a tangible set of recommendations for future work designed to broaden community engagement and enhance the sustainability of open source initiatives, drawing on both participants' experience as well as additional research.

Date

28.10.2016 18:22:33

0.047836073 = product of:
  0.14350821 = sum of:
    0.110672936 = weight(_text_:themes in 4054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.110672936 = score(doc=4054,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.31161693 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048470292 = queryNorm
        0.35515702 = fieldWeight in 4054, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4054)
    0.03283528 = weight(_text_:22 in 4054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03283528 = score(doc=4054,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1697347 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048470292 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4054, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4054)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine researchers' motivations to publish by comparing different career stages (PhD students; temporarily employed postdocs/new professors; scholars with permanent employment) with regard to epistemic, pragmatic, and personal motives. Design/methodology/approach This qualitative analysis is mainly based on semi-structured narrative interviews with 91 researchers in the humanities, social, and natural sciences, based at six renowned (anonymous) universities in Germany, the UK, and the USA. These narratives contain answers to the direct question "why do you publish?" as well as remarks on motivations to publish in relation to other questions and themes. The interdisciplinary interpretation is based on both sociological science studies and philosophy of science in practice. Findings At each career stage, epistemic, pragmatic, and personal motivations to publish are weighed differently. Confirming earlier studies, the authors find that PhD students and postdoctoral researchers in temporary positions mainly feel pressured to publish for career-related reasons. However, across status groups, researchers also want to publish in order to support collective knowledge generation. Research limitations/implications The sample of interviewees may be biased toward those interested in reflecting on their day-to-day work. Social implications Continuous and collective reflection is imperative for preventing uncritical internalization of pragmatic reasons to publish. Creating occasions for reflection is a task not only of researchers themselves, but also of administrators, funders, and other stakeholders. Originality/value Most studies have illuminated how researchers publish while adapting to or growing into the contemporary publish-or-perish culture. This paper addresses the rarely asked question why researchers publish at all.

Date

20. 1.2015 18:30:22

0.047836073 = product of:
  0.14350821 = sum of:
    0.110672936 = weight(_text_:themes in 4150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.110672936 = score(doc=4150,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.31161693 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048470292 = queryNorm
        0.35515702 = fieldWeight in 4150, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4150)
    0.03283528 = weight(_text_:22 in 4150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03283528 = score(doc=4150,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1697347 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048470292 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4150, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4150)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Abstract

The domain of knowledge organization (KO) represents a foundational area of information science. One way to better understand the intellectual structure of the KO domain is to apply bibliometric methods to key contributors to the literature. This study analyzes the most prolific contributing authors to the journal Knowledge Organization, the sources they cite and the citations they receive for the period 1993 to 2016. The analyses were conducted using visualization outcomes of citation, co-citation and author bibliographic coupling analysis to reveal theoretical points of reference among authors and the most prominent research themes that constitute this scientific community. Birger Hjørland was the most cited author, and was situated at or near the middle of each of the maps based on different citation relationships. The proximities between authors resulting from the different citation relationships demonstrate how authors situate themselves intellectually through the citations they give and how other authors situate them through the citations received. There is a consistent core of theoretical references as well among the most productive authors. We observed a close network of scholarly communication between the authors cited in this core, which indicates the actual role of the journal Knowledge Organization as a space for knowledge construction in the area of knowledge organization.

Source

Knowledge organization. 45(2018) no.1, S.13-22

0.044907145 = product of:
  0.26944286 = sum of:
    0.26944286 = weight(_text_:3a in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.26944286 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.41093168 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048470292 = queryNorm
        0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Footnote

Rez. in: Philosophisch-ethische Rezensionen vom 09.11.2019 (Jürgen Czogalla), Unter: https://philosophisch-ethische-rezensionen.de/rezension/Goedert1.html. In: B.I.T. online 23(2020) H.3, S.345-347 (W. Sühl-Strohmenger) [Unter: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.b-i-t-online.de%2Fheft%2F2020-03-rezensionen.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0iY3f_zNcvEjeZ6inHVnOK]. In: Open Password Nr. 805 vom 14.08.2020 (H.-C. Hobohm) [Unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzE0MywiOGI3NjZkZmNkZjQ1IiwwLDAsMTMxLDFd].

0.043130383 = product of:
  0.12939115 = sum of:
    0.10968998 = weight(_text_:achten in 3206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10968998 = score(doc=3206,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.4005052 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.2629 = idf(docFreq=30, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048470292 = queryNorm
        0.27387905 = fieldWeight in 3206, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.2629 = idf(docFreq=30, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3206)
    0.019701166 = weight(_text_:22 in 3206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019701166 = score(doc=3206,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1697347 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048470292 = queryNorm
        0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 3206, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3206)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Content

"Ein häufiger Fehler ist auch, bei Google nach Büchern zu suchen", sagt Grau. Die Suchmaschine enthält keine Bibliotheksdaten. Außerdem sollten Studenten darauf achten, ob sie nach einem Zeitschriften-Artikel oder einer Monografie suchen. Benötigt man einen Aufsatz, muss man nach dem Titel der Zeitschrift und nicht nach dem Titel des Artikels suchen. Wichtig ist auch, den Suchschlüssel zu beachten. Wer nach dem Autor Johann Wolfgang von Goethe sucht, aber das Wort in der Titelsuche eingibt, bekommt andere Treffermengen. Studenten sollten die Suche auch nicht zu sehr eingrenzen. "Dann findet man nichts", warnt Grau. Andererseits darf man auch nicht zu allgemein suchen. Wer nach einem Buch zur deutschen Geschichte sucht, bekommt bei der Eingabe von "deutsche Geschichte" Tausende Treffer. "Da muss man den richtigen Suchschlüssel auswählen", erklärt Grau. Wer im Feld "Titelanfänge" etwa "deutsche Geschichte" eingibt, finde alle Titel mit diesen Wörtern in genau dieser Reihenfolge. Er lande also nicht beim Buch "Deutsche Naturlyrik: ihre Geschichte in Einzelanalysen". Das ist bei weit gefassten Begriffen sehr wichtig und hilfreich."

Date

3. 5.1997 8:44:22

0.038491838 = product of:
  0.23095101 = sum of:
    0.23095101 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.23095101 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.41093168 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048470292 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Content

Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.