-
Koch, C.: Was ist Bewusstsein? (2020)
0.07
0.067557365 = product of:
0.13511473 = sum of:
0.13511473 = sum of:
0.066538416 = weight(_text_:c in 5723) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.066538416 = score(doc=5723,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17459157 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.05061498 = queryNorm
0.381109 = fieldWeight in 5723, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5723)
0.06857631 = weight(_text_:22 in 5723) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06857631 = score(doc=5723,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17724504 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05061498 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5723, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5723)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 17. 1.2020 22:15:11
-
He, C.; Wu, J.; Zhang, Q.: Research leadership flow determinants and the role of proximity in research collaborations (2020)
0.05
0.048203 = sum of:
0.031568393 = product of:
0.12627357 = sum of:
0.12627357 = weight(_text_:author's in 30) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12627357 = score(doc=30,freq=2.0), product of:
0.34014043 = queryWeight, product of:
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.05061498 = queryNorm
0.3712395 = fieldWeight in 30, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=30)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.016634604 = product of:
0.033269208 = sum of:
0.033269208 = weight(_text_:c in 30) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033269208 = score(doc=30,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17459157 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.05061498 = queryNorm
0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 30, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=30)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Characterizing the leadership in research is important to revealing the interaction pattern and organizational structure through research collaboration. This research defines the leadership role based on the corresponding author's affiliation, and presents the first quantitative research on the factors and evolution of 5 proximity dimensions (geographical, cognitive, institutional, social, and economic) of research leadership. The data to capture research leadership consist of a set of multi-institution articles in the fields of "Life Sciences & Biomedicine," "Technology," "Physical Sciences," "Social Sciences," and "Humanities & Arts" during 2013-2017 from the Web of Science Core Citation Database. A Tobit regression-based gravity model indicates that the mass of research leadership of both the leading and participating institutions and the geographical, cognitive, institutional, social, and economic proximities are important factors for the flow of research leadership among Chinese institutions. In general, the effect of these proximities for research leadership flow has been declining recently. The outcome of this research sheds light on the leadership evolution and flow among Chinese institutions, and thus can provide evidence and support for grant allocation policies to facilitate scientific research and collaborations.
-
Zheng, X.; Chen, J.; Yan, E.; Ni, C.: Gender and country biases in Wikipedia citations to scholarly publications (2023)
0.04
0.04053442 = product of:
0.08106884 = sum of:
0.08106884 = sum of:
0.039923053 = weight(_text_:c in 886) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039923053 = score(doc=886,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17459157 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.05061498 = queryNorm
0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 886, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=886)
0.041145787 = weight(_text_:22 in 886) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041145787 = score(doc=886,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17724504 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05061498 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 886, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=886)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2023 18:53:32
-
Ma, L.: Information, platformized (2023)
0.04
0.04053442 = product of:
0.08106884 = sum of:
0.08106884 = sum of:
0.039923053 = weight(_text_:c in 888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039923053 = score(doc=888,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17459157 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.05061498 = queryNorm
0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 888, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=888)
0.041145787 = weight(_text_:22 in 888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041145787 = score(doc=888,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17724504 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05061498 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 888, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=888)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Scholarly publications are often regarded as "information" by default. They are collected, organized, preserved, and made accessible as knowledge records. However, the instances of article retraction, misconduct and malpractices of researchers and the replication crisis have raised concerns about the informativeness and evidential qualities of information. Among many factors, knowledge production has moved away from "normal science" under the systemic influences of platformization involving the datafication and commodification of scholarly articles, research profiles and research activities. This article aims to understand the platformization of information by examining how research practices and knowledge production are steered by market and platform mechanisms in four ways: (a) ownership of information; (b) metrics for sale; (c) relevance by metrics, and (d) market-based competition. In conclusion, the article argues that information is platformized when platforms hold the dominating power in determining what kinds of information can be disseminated and rewarded and when informativeness is decoupled from the normative agreement or consensus co-constructed and co-determined in an open and public discourse.
- Date
- 22. 1.2023 19:01:47
-
Hottenrott, H.; Rose, M.E.; Lawson, C.: ¬The rise of multiple institutional affiliations in academia (2021)
0.03
0.033778682 = product of:
0.067557365 = sum of:
0.067557365 = sum of:
0.033269208 = weight(_text_:c in 313) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033269208 = score(doc=313,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17459157 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.05061498 = queryNorm
0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 313, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=313)
0.034288157 = weight(_text_:22 in 313) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034288157 = score(doc=313,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17724504 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05061498 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 313, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=313)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This study provides the first systematic, international, large-scale evidence on the extent and nature of multiple institutional affiliations on journal publications. Studying more than 15 million authors and 22 million articles from 40 countries we document that: In 2019, almost one in three articles was (co-)authored by authors with multiple affiliations and the share of authors with multiple affiliations increased from around 10% to 16% since 1996. The growth of multiple affiliations is prevalent in all fields and it is stronger in high impact journals. About 60% of multiple affiliations are between institutions from within the academic sector. International co-affiliations, which account for about a quarter of multiple affiliations, most often involve institutions from the United States, China, Germany and the United Kingdom, suggesting a core-periphery network. Network analysis also reveals a number communities of countries that are more likely to share affiliations. We discuss potential causes and show that the timing of the rise in multiple affiliations can be linked to the introduction of more competitive funding structures such as "excellence initiatives" in a number of countries. We discuss implications for science and science policy.
-
Cox, A.; Fulton, C.: Geographies of information behaviour : a conceptual exploration (2022)
0.03
0.033778682 = product of:
0.067557365 = sum of:
0.067557365 = sum of:
0.033269208 = weight(_text_:c in 678) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033269208 = score(doc=678,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17459157 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.05061498 = queryNorm
0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 678, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=678)
0.034288157 = weight(_text_:22 in 678) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034288157 = score(doc=678,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17724504 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05061498 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 678, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=678)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 5. 6.2022 17:20:22
-
Lee, D.J.; Stvilia, B.; Ha, S.; Hahn, D.: ¬The structure and priorities of researchers' scholarly profile maintenance activities : a case of institutional research information management system (2023)
0.03
0.033778682 = product of:
0.067557365 = sum of:
0.067557365 = sum of:
0.033269208 = weight(_text_:c in 884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033269208 = score(doc=884,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17459157 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.05061498 = queryNorm
0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 884, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=884)
0.034288157 = weight(_text_:22 in 884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034288157 = score(doc=884,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17724504 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05061498 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 884, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=884)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Research information management systems (RIMS) have become critical components of information technology infrastructure on university campuses. They are used not just for sharing and promoting faculty research, but also for conducting faculty evaluation and development, facilitating research collaborations, identifying mentors for student projects, and expert consultants for local businesses. This study is one of the first empirical investigations of the structure of researchers' scholarly profile maintenance activities in a nonmandatory institutional RIMS. By analyzing the RIMS's log data, we identified 11 tasks researchers performed when updating their profiles. These tasks were further grouped into three activities: (a) adding publication, (b) enhancing researcher identity, and (c) improving research discoverability. In addition, we found that junior researchers and female researchers were more engaged in maintaining their RIMS profiles than senior researchers and male researchers. The results provide insights for designing profile maintenance action templates for institutional RIMS that are tailored to researchers' characteristics and help enhance researchers' engagement in the curation of their research information. This also suggests that female and junior researchers can serve as early adopters of institutional RIMS.
- Date
- 22. 1.2023 18:43:02
-
Yu, C.; Xue, H.; An, L.; Li, G.: ¬A lightweight semantic-enhanced interactive network for efficient short-text matching (2023)
0.03
0.033778682 = product of:
0.067557365 = sum of:
0.067557365 = sum of:
0.033269208 = weight(_text_:c in 890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033269208 = score(doc=890,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17459157 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.05061498 = queryNorm
0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 890, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=890)
0.034288157 = weight(_text_:22 in 890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034288157 = score(doc=890,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17724504 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05061498 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 890, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=890)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2023 19:05:27
-
Cerda-Cosme, R.; Méndez, E.: Analysis of shared research data in Spanish scientific papers about COVID-19 : a first approach (2023)
0.03
0.033778682 = product of:
0.067557365 = sum of:
0.067557365 = sum of:
0.033269208 = weight(_text_:c in 916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033269208 = score(doc=916,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17459157 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.05061498 = queryNorm
0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 916, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=916)
0.034288157 = weight(_text_:22 in 916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034288157 = score(doc=916,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17724504 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05061498 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 916, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=916)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- During the coronavirus pandemic, changes in the way science is done and shared occurred, which motivates meta-research to help understand science communication in crises and improve its effectiveness. The objective is to study how many Spanish scientific papers on COVID-19 published during 2020 share their research data. Qualitative and descriptive study applying nine attributes: (a) availability, (b) accessibility, (c) format, (d) licensing, (e) linkage, (f) funding, (g) editorial policy, (h) content, and (i) statistics. We analyzed 1,340 papers, 1,173 (87.5%) did not have research data. A total of 12.5% share their research data of which 2.1% share their data in repositories, 5% share their data through a simple request, 0.2% do not have permission to share their data, and 5.2% share their data as supplementary material. There is a small percentage that shares their research data; however, it demonstrates the researchers' poor knowledge on how to properly share their research data and their lack of knowledge on what is research data.
- Date
- 21. 3.2023 19:22:02
-
Noever, D.; Ciolino, M.: ¬The Turing deception (2022)
0.03
0.03014625 = product of:
0.0602925 = sum of:
0.0602925 = product of:
0.24117 = sum of:
0.24117 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.24117 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
0.42911434 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.05061498 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN
-
Hocker, J.; Schindler, C.; Rittberger, M.: Participatory design for ontologies : a case study of an open science ontology for qualitative coding schemas (2020)
0.03
0.027022947 = product of:
0.054045893 = sum of:
0.054045893 = sum of:
0.026615368 = weight(_text_:c in 179) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026615368 = score(doc=179,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17459157 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.05061498 = queryNorm
0.1524436 = fieldWeight in 179, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=179)
0.027430525 = weight(_text_:22 in 179) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027430525 = score(doc=179,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17724504 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05061498 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 179, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=179)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
-
Dietz, K.: en.wikipedia.org > 6 Mio. Artikel (2020)
0.03
0.025121877 = product of:
0.050243754 = sum of:
0.050243754 = product of:
0.20097502 = sum of:
0.20097502 = weight(_text_:3a in 5669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20097502 = score(doc=5669,freq=2.0), product of:
0.42911434 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.05061498 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5669, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5669)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- "Die Englischsprachige Wikipedia verfügt jetzt über mehr als 6 Millionen Artikel. An zweiter Stelle kommt die deutschsprachige Wikipedia mit 2.3 Millionen Artikeln, an dritter Stelle steht die französischsprachige Wikipedia mit 2.1 Millionen Artikeln (via Researchbuzz: Firehose <https://rbfirehose.com/2020/01/24/techcrunch-wikipedia-now-has-more-than-6-million-articles-in-english/> und Techcrunch <https://techcrunch.com/2020/01/23/wikipedia-english-six-million-articles/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Techcrunch+%28TechCrunch%29&guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly9yYmZpcmVob3NlLmNvbS8yMDIwLzAxLzI0L3RlY2hjcnVuY2gtd2lraXBlZGlhLW5vdy1oYXMtbW9yZS10aGFuLTYtbWlsbGlvbi1hcnRpY2xlcy1pbi1lbmdsaXNoLw&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAK0zHfjdDZ_spFZBF_z-zDjtL5iWvuKDumFTzm4HvQzkUfE2pLXQzGS6FGB_y-VISdMEsUSvkNsg2U_NWQ4lwWSvOo3jvXo1I3GtgHpP8exukVxYAnn5mJspqX50VHIWFADHhs5AerkRn3hMRtf_R3F1qmEbo8EROZXp328HMC-o>). 250120 via digithek ch = #fineBlog s.a.: Angesichts der Veröffentlichung des 6-millionsten Artikels vergangene Woche in der englischsprachigen Wikipedia hat die Community-Zeitungsseite "Wikipedia Signpost" ein Moratorium bei der Veröffentlichung von Unternehmensartikeln gefordert. Das sei kein Vorwurf gegen die Wikimedia Foundation, aber die derzeitigen Maßnahmen, um die Enzyklopädie gegen missbräuchliches undeklariertes Paid Editing zu schützen, funktionierten ganz klar nicht. *"Da die ehrenamtlichen Autoren derzeit von Werbung in Gestalt von Wikipedia-Artikeln überwältigt werden, und da die WMF nicht in der Lage zu sein scheint, dem irgendetwas entgegenzusetzen, wäre der einzige gangbare Weg für die Autoren, fürs erste die Neuanlage von Artikeln über Unternehmen zu untersagen"*, schreibt der Benutzer Smallbones in seinem Editorial <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2020-01-27/From_the_editor> zur heutigen Ausgabe."
-
Gabler, S.: Vergabe von DDC-Sachgruppen mittels eines Schlagwort-Thesaurus (2021)
0.03
0.025121877 = product of:
0.050243754 = sum of:
0.050243754 = product of:
0.20097502 = sum of:
0.20097502 = weight(_text_:3a in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20097502 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
0.42911434 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.05061498 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Master thesis Master of Science (Library and Information Studies) (MSc), Universität Wien. Advisor: Christoph Steiner. Vgl.: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371680244_Vergabe_von_DDC-Sachgruppen_mittels_eines_Schlagwort-Thesaurus. DOI: 10.25365/thesis.70030. Vgl. dazu die Präsentation unter: https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=0CAIQw7AJahcKEwjwoZzzytz_AhUAAAAAHQAAAAAQAg&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.dnb.de%2Fdownload%2Fattachments%2F252121510%2FDA3%2520Workshop-Gabler.pdf%3Fversion%3D1%26modificationDate%3D1671093170000%26api%3Dv2&psig=AOvVaw0szwENK1or3HevgvIDOfjx&ust=1687719410889597&opi=89978449.
-
¬Der Student aus dem Computer (2023)
0.02
0.024001708 = product of:
0.048003417 = sum of:
0.048003417 = product of:
0.09600683 = sum of:
0.09600683 = weight(_text_:22 in 1079) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09600683 = score(doc=1079,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17724504 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05061498 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1079, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1079)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 27. 1.2023 16:22:55
-
Jaeger, L.: Wissenschaftler versus Wissenschaft (2020)
0.02
0.020572893 = product of:
0.041145787 = sum of:
0.041145787 = product of:
0.08229157 = sum of:
0.08229157 = weight(_text_:22 in 4156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08229157 = score(doc=4156,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17724504 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05061498 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4156, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4156)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 2. 3.2020 14:08:22
-
Ibrahim, G.M.; Taylor, M.: Krebszellen manipulieren Neurone : Gliome (2023)
0.02
0.020572893 = product of:
0.041145787 = sum of:
0.041145787 = product of:
0.08229157 = sum of:
0.08229157 = weight(_text_:22 in 1203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08229157 = score(doc=1203,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17724504 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05061498 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1203, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1203)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 2023, H.10, S.22-24
-
Hobohm, H.-C.: Zensur in der Digitalität - eine Überwindung der Moderne? : Die Rolle der Bibliotheken (2020)
0.02
0.019961527 = product of:
0.039923053 = sum of:
0.039923053 = product of:
0.07984611 = sum of:
0.07984611 = weight(_text_:c in 5371) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07984611 = score(doc=5371,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17459157 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.05061498 = queryNorm
0.45733082 = fieldWeight in 5371, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5371)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Metz, C.: ¬The new chatbots could change the world : can you trust them? (2022)
0.02
0.019961527 = product of:
0.039923053 = sum of:
0.039923053 = product of:
0.07984611 = sum of:
0.07984611 = weight(_text_:c in 854) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07984611 = score(doc=854,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17459157 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.05061498 = queryNorm
0.45733082 = fieldWeight in 854, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=854)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Bodoff, D.; Richter-Levin, Y.: Viewpoints in indexing term assignment (2020)
0.02
0.018941035 = product of:
0.03788207 = sum of:
0.03788207 = product of:
0.15152828 = sum of:
0.15152828 = weight(_text_:author's in 5765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15152828 = score(doc=5765,freq=2.0), product of:
0.34014043 = queryWeight, product of:
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.05061498 = queryNorm
0.44548744 = fieldWeight in 5765, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5765)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The literature on assigned indexing considers three possible viewpoints-the author's viewpoint as evidenced in the title, the users' viewpoint, and the indexer's viewpoint-and asks whether and which of those views should be reflected in an indexer's choice of terms to assign to an item. We study this question empirically, as opposed to normatively. Based on the literature that discusses whose viewpoints should be reflected, we construct a research model that includes those same three viewpoints as factors that might be influencing term assignment in actual practice. In the unique study design that we employ, the records of term assignments made by identified indexers in academic libraries are cross-referenced with the results of a survey that those same indexers completed on political views. Our results indicate that in our setting, variance in term assignment was best explained by indexers' personal political views.
-
Grundlagen der Informationswissenschaft (2023)
0.02
0.017993078 = product of:
0.035986155 = sum of:
0.035986155 = product of:
0.07197231 = sum of:
0.07197231 = weight(_text_:c in 1043) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07197231 = score(doc=1043,freq=26.0), product of:
0.17459157 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.05061498 = queryNorm
0.41223246 = fieldWeight in 1043, product of:
5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
26.0 = termFreq=26.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1043)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Hans-Christian Jetter: B 13 Informationsvisualisierung und Visual Analytics - 295 / Melanie Siegel: B 14 Maschinelle Übersetzung - 307 / Ulrich Herb: B 15 Verfahren der wissenschaftlichen Qualitäts-/ Relevanzsicherung / Evaluierung - 317 / Thomas Mandl: B 16 Text Mining und Data Mining - 327 / Heike Neuroth: B 17 Forschungsdaten - 339 / Isabella Peters: B 18 Folksonomies & Social Tagging - 351 / Christa Womser-Hacker: C 1 Informationswissenschaftliche Perspektiven des Information Retrieval - 365 / Norbert Fuhr: C 2 Modelle im Information Retrieval - 379 / Dirk Lewandowski: C 3 Suchmaschinen - 391 / David Elsweiler & Udo Kruschwitz: C 4 Interaktives Information Retrieval - 403 / Thomas Mandl & Sebastian Diem: C 5 Bild- und Video-Retrieval - 413 / Maximilian Eibl, Josef Haupt, Stefan Kahl, Stefan Taubert & Thomas Wilhelm-Stein: C 6 Audio- und Musik-Retrieval - 423 / Christa Womser-Hacker: C 7 Cross-Language Information Retrieval (CLIR) - 433 / Vivien Petras & Christa Womser-Hacker: C 8 Evaluation im Information Retrieval - 443 / Philipp Schaer: C 9 Sprachmodelle und neuronale Netze im Information Retrieval - 455 / Stefanie Elbeshausen: C 10 Modellierung von Benutzer*innen, Kontextualisierung, Personalisierung - 467 / Ragna Seidler-de Alwis: C 11 Informationsrecherche - 477 / Ulrich Reimer: C 12 Empfehlungssysteme - 485 / Elke Greifeneder & Kirsten Schlebbe: D 1 Information Behaviour - 499 / Nicola Döring: D 2 Computervermittelte Kommunikation - 511 / Hans-Christian Jetter: D 3 Mensch-Computer-Interaktion, Usability und User Experience - 525 / Gabriele Irle: D 4 Emotionen im Information Seeking - 535 /
- Editor
- Womser-Hacker, C.
