-
Hottenrott, H.; Rose, M.E.; Lawson, C.: ¬The rise of multiple institutional affiliations in academia (2021)
0.12
0.12001037 = sum of:
0.027457891 = product of:
0.109831564 = sum of:
0.109831564 = weight(_text_:authors in 313) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.109831564 = score(doc=313,freq=6.0), product of:
0.25179064 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.05523161 = queryNorm
0.43620193 = fieldWeight in 313, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=313)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.092552476 = sum of:
0.03630372 = weight(_text_:c in 313) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03630372 = score(doc=313,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1905162 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.05523161 = queryNorm
0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 313, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=313)
0.018833151 = weight(_text_:h in 313) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018833151 = score(doc=313,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13722013 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.05523161 = queryNorm
0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 313, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=313)
0.0374156 = weight(_text_:22 in 313) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0374156 = score(doc=313,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19341168 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05523161 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 313, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=313)
- Abstract
- This study provides the first systematic, international, large-scale evidence on the extent and nature of multiple institutional affiliations on journal publications. Studying more than 15 million authors and 22 million articles from 40 countries we document that: In 2019, almost one in three articles was (co-)authored by authors with multiple affiliations and the share of authors with multiple affiliations increased from around 10% to 16% since 1996. The growth of multiple affiliations is prevalent in all fields and it is stronger in high impact journals. About 60% of multiple affiliations are between institutions from within the academic sector. International co-affiliations, which account for about a quarter of multiple affiliations, most often involve institutions from the United States, China, Germany and the United Kingdom, suggesting a core-periphery network. Network analysis also reveals a number communities of countries that are more likely to share affiliations. We discuss potential causes and show that the timing of the rise in multiple affiliations can be linked to the introduction of more competitive funding structures such as "excellence initiatives" in a number of countries. We discuss implications for science and science policy.
-
Koch, C.: Was ist Bewusstsein? (2020)
0.09
0.092552476 = product of:
0.18510495 = sum of:
0.18510495 = sum of:
0.07260744 = weight(_text_:c in 5723) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07260744 = score(doc=5723,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1905162 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.05523161 = queryNorm
0.381109 = fieldWeight in 5723, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5723)
0.037666302 = weight(_text_:h in 5723) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037666302 = score(doc=5723,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13722013 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.05523161 = queryNorm
0.27449545 = fieldWeight in 5723, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5723)
0.0748312 = weight(_text_:22 in 5723) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0748312 = score(doc=5723,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19341168 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05523161 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5723, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5723)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 17. 1.2020 22:15:11
- Source
- Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 2020, H.2, S.12-17
-
Zheng, X.; Chen, J.; Yan, E.; Ni, C.: Gender and country biases in Wikipedia citations to scholarly publications (2023)
0.09
0.09192492 = sum of:
0.032949466 = product of:
0.13179787 = sum of:
0.13179787 = weight(_text_:authors in 886) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13179787 = score(doc=886,freq=6.0), product of:
0.25179064 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.05523161 = queryNorm
0.52344227 = fieldWeight in 886, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=886)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.05897546 = product of:
0.08846319 = sum of:
0.043564465 = weight(_text_:c in 886) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043564465 = score(doc=886,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1905162 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.05523161 = queryNorm
0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 886, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=886)
0.04489872 = weight(_text_:22 in 886) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04489872 = score(doc=886,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19341168 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05523161 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 886, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=886)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Ensuring Wikipedia cites scholarly publications based on quality and relevancy without biases is critical to credible and fair knowledge dissemination. We investigate gender- and country-based biases in Wikipedia citation practices using linked data from the Web of Science and a Wikipedia citation dataset. Using coarsened exact matching, we show that publications by women are cited less by Wikipedia than expected, and publications by women are less likely to be cited than those by men. Scholarly publications by authors affiliated with non-Anglosphere countries are also disadvantaged in getting cited by Wikipedia, compared with those by authors affiliated with Anglosphere countries. The level of gender- or country-based inequalities varies by research field, and the gender-country intersectional bias is prominent in math-intensive STEM fields. To ensure the credibility and equality of knowledge presentation, Wikipedia should consider strategies and guidelines to cite scholarly publications independent of the gender and country of authors.
- Date
- 22. 1.2023 18:53:32
-
Cox, A.; Fulton, C.: Geographies of information behaviour : a conceptual exploration (2022)
0.06
0.06499904 = sum of:
0.01585282 = product of:
0.06341128 = sum of:
0.06341128 = weight(_text_:authors in 678) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06341128 = score(doc=678,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25179064 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.05523161 = queryNorm
0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 678, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=678)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.049146216 = product of:
0.07371932 = sum of:
0.03630372 = weight(_text_:c in 678) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03630372 = score(doc=678,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1905162 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.05523161 = queryNorm
0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 678, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=678)
0.0374156 = weight(_text_:22 in 678) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0374156 = score(doc=678,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19341168 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05523161 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 678, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=678)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Purpose This article examines the relation between place, space and information behaviour. Design/methodology/approach Concepts of place and space are explored through a comparison of three leisure pursuits: running, urban exploration and genealogy, based on the authors' research and the published literature. Findings A socially constructed meaning of place is central to each leisure activity but how it is experienced physically, emotionally and imaginatively are different. Places have very different meanings within each practice. Mirroring this, information behaviours are also very different: such as the sources used, the type of information created and how it is shared or not shared. Information behaviour contributes to the meanings associated with place in particular social practices. Research limitations/implications Meaning attached to place can be understood as actively constructed within social practices. Rather than context for information behaviours in the sense of an outside, containing, even constraining, environment, the meaning of place can be seen as actively constructed within social practices and by the information behaviours that are part of them. Originality/value The paper adds a new perspective to the understanding of place and space in the study of information behaviour.
- Date
- 5. 6.2022 17:20:22
-
Jiang, Y.-C.; Li, H.: ¬The theoretical basis and basic principles of knowledge network construction in digital library (2023)
0.06
0.063132875 = sum of:
0.019023383 = product of:
0.07609353 = sum of:
0.07609353 = weight(_text_:authors in 1130) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07609353 = score(doc=1130,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25179064 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.05523161 = queryNorm
0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 1130, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1130)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.044109493 = product of:
0.06616424 = sum of:
0.043564465 = weight(_text_:c in 1130) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043564465 = score(doc=1130,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1905162 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.05523161 = queryNorm
0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 1130, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1130)
0.02259978 = weight(_text_:h in 1130) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02259978 = score(doc=1130,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13722013 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.05523161 = queryNorm
0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 1130, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1130)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Knowledge network construction (KNC) is the essence of dynamic knowledge architecture, and is helpful to illustrate ubiquitous knowledge service in digital libraries (DLs). The authors explore its theoretical foundations and basic rules to elucidate the basic principles of KNC in DLs. The results indicate that world general connection, small-world phenomenon, relevance theory, unity and continuity of science development have been the production tool, architecture aim and scientific foundation of KNC in DLs. By analyzing both the characteristics of KNC based on different types of knowledge linking and the relationships between different forms of knowledge and the appropriate ways of knowledge linking, the basic principle of KNC is summarized as follows: let each kind of knowledge linking form each shows its ability, each kind of knowledge manifestation each answer the purpose intended in practice, and then subjective knowledge network and objective knowledge network are organically combined. This will lay a solid theoretical foundation and provide an action guide for DLs to construct knowledge networks.
-
Hocker, J.; Schindler, C.; Rittberger, M.: Participatory design for ontologies : a case study of an open science ontology for qualitative coding schemas (2020)
0.06
0.061283287 = sum of:
0.021966312 = product of:
0.08786525 = sum of:
0.08786525 = weight(_text_:authors in 179) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08786525 = score(doc=179,freq=6.0), product of:
0.25179064 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.05523161 = queryNorm
0.34896153 = fieldWeight in 179, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=179)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.039316975 = product of:
0.05897546 = sum of:
0.029042976 = weight(_text_:c in 179) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029042976 = score(doc=179,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1905162 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.05523161 = queryNorm
0.1524436 = fieldWeight in 179, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=179)
0.029932482 = weight(_text_:22 in 179) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029932482 = score(doc=179,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19341168 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05523161 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 179, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=179)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Purpose The open science movement calls for transparent and retraceable research processes. While infrastructures to support these practices in qualitative research are lacking, the design needs to consider different approaches and workflows. The paper bases on the definition of ontologies as shared conceptualizations of knowledge (Borst, 1999). The authors argue that participatory design is a good way to create these shared conceptualizations by giving domain experts and future users a voice in the design process via interviews, workshops and observations. Design/methodology/approach This paper presents a novel approach for creating ontologies in the field of open science using participatory design. As a case study the creation of an ontology for qualitative coding schemas is presented. Coding schemas are an important result of qualitative research, and reuse can yield great potential for open science making qualitative research more transparent, enhance sharing of coding schemas and teaching of qualitative methods. The participatory design process consisted of three parts: a requirement analysis using interviews and an observation, a design phase accompanied by interviews and an evaluation phase based on user tests as well as interviews. Findings The research showed several positive outcomes due to participatory design: higher commitment of users, mutual learning, high quality feedback and better quality of the ontology. However, there are two obstacles in this approach: First, contradictive answers by the interviewees, which needs to be balanced; second, this approach takes more time due to interview planning and analysis. Practical implications The implication of the paper is in the long run to decentralize the design of open science infrastructures and to involve parties affected on several levels. Originality/value In ontology design, several methods exist by using user-centered design or participatory design doing workshops. In this paper, the authors outline the potentials for participatory design using mainly interviews in creating an ontology for open science. The authors focus on close contact to researchers in order to build the ontology upon the expert's knowledge.
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
-
Bianchini, C.; Bargioni, S.: Automated classification using linked open data : a case study on faceted classification and Wikidata (2021)
0.05
0.048328716 = sum of:
0.03138698 = product of:
0.12554792 = sum of:
0.12554792 = weight(_text_:authors in 724) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12554792 = score(doc=724,freq=4.0), product of:
0.25179064 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.05523161 = queryNorm
0.49862027 = fieldWeight in 724, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=724)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.016941737 = product of:
0.05082521 = sum of:
0.05082521 = weight(_text_:c in 724) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05082521 = score(doc=724,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1905162 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.05523161 = queryNorm
0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 724, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=724)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- The Wikidata gadget, CCLitBox, for the automated classification of literary authors and works by a faceted classification and using Linked Open Data (LOD) is presented. The tool reproduces the classification algorithm of class O Literature of the Colon Classification and uses data freely available in Wikidata to create Colon Classification class numbers. CCLitBox is totally free and enables any user to classify literary authors and their works; it is easily accessible to everybody; it uses LOD from Wikidata but missing data for classification can be freely added if necessary; it is readymade for any cooperative and networked project.
-
Yu, C.; Xue, H.; An, L.; Li, G.: ¬A lightweight semantic-enhanced interactive network for efficient short-text matching (2023)
0.05
0.046276238 = product of:
0.092552476 = sum of:
0.092552476 = sum of:
0.03630372 = weight(_text_:c in 890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03630372 = score(doc=890,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1905162 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.05523161 = queryNorm
0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 890, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=890)
0.018833151 = weight(_text_:h in 890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018833151 = score(doc=890,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13722013 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.05523161 = queryNorm
0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 890, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=890)
0.0374156 = weight(_text_:22 in 890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0374156 = score(doc=890,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19341168 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05523161 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 890, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=890)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2023 19:05:27
-
Cerda-Cosme, R.; Méndez, E.: Analysis of shared research data in Spanish scientific papers about COVID-19 : a first approach (2023)
0.05
0.046276238 = product of:
0.092552476 = sum of:
0.092552476 = sum of:
0.03630372 = weight(_text_:c in 916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03630372 = score(doc=916,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1905162 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.05523161 = queryNorm
0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 916, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=916)
0.018833151 = weight(_text_:h in 916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018833151 = score(doc=916,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13722013 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.05523161 = queryNorm
0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 916, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=916)
0.0374156 = weight(_text_:22 in 916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0374156 = score(doc=916,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19341168 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05523161 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 916, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=916)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- During the coronavirus pandemic, changes in the way science is done and shared occurred, which motivates meta-research to help understand science communication in crises and improve its effectiveness. The objective is to study how many Spanish scientific papers on COVID-19 published during 2020 share their research data. Qualitative and descriptive study applying nine attributes: (a) availability, (b) accessibility, (c) format, (d) licensing, (e) linkage, (f) funding, (g) editorial policy, (h) content, and (i) statistics. We analyzed 1,340 papers, 1,173 (87.5%) did not have research data. A total of 12.5% share their research data of which 2.1% share their data in repositories, 5% share their data through a simple request, 0.2% do not have permission to share their data, and 5.2% share their data as supplementary material. There is a small percentage that shares their research data; however, it demonstrates the researchers' poor knowledge on how to properly share their research data and their lack of knowledge on what is research data.
- Date
- 21. 3.2023 19:22:02
-
Ibrahim, G.M.; Taylor, M.: Krebszellen manipulieren Neurone : Gliome (2023)
0.04
0.044999 = product of:
0.089998 = sum of:
0.089998 = product of:
0.134997 = sum of:
0.04519956 = weight(_text_:h in 1203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04519956 = score(doc=1203,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13722013 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.05523161 = queryNorm
0.32939452 = fieldWeight in 1203, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1203)
0.08979744 = weight(_text_:22 in 1203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08979744 = score(doc=1203,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19341168 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05523161 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1203, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1203)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 2023, H.10, S.22-24
-
Oliver, C.: Leveraging KOS to extend our reach with automated processes (2021)
0.04
0.04472649 = sum of:
0.025364509 = product of:
0.101458035 = sum of:
0.101458035 = weight(_text_:authors in 722) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.101458035 = score(doc=722,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25179064 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.05523161 = queryNorm
0.40294603 = fieldWeight in 722, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=722)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.019361984 = product of:
0.058085952 = sum of:
0.058085952 = weight(_text_:c in 722) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058085952 = score(doc=722,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1905162 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.05523161 = queryNorm
0.3048872 = fieldWeight in 722, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=722)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- This article provides a conclusion to the special issue on Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Automated Processes for Subject Access. The authors who contributed to this special issue have provoked interesting questions as well as bringing attention to important issues. This concluding article looks at common themes and highlights some of the questions raised.
-
Hobohm, H.-C.: Zensur in der Digitalität - eine Überwindung der Moderne? : Die Rolle der Bibliotheken (2020)
0.04
0.044109493 = product of:
0.08821899 = sum of:
0.08821899 = product of:
0.13232848 = sum of:
0.08712893 = weight(_text_:c in 5371) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08712893 = score(doc=5371,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1905162 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.05523161 = queryNorm
0.45733082 = fieldWeight in 5371, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5371)
0.04519956 = weight(_text_:h in 5371) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04519956 = score(doc=5371,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13722013 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.05523161 = queryNorm
0.32939452 = fieldWeight in 5371, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5371)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Zhu, Y.; Quan, L.; Chen, P.-Y.; Kim, M.C.; Che, C.: Predicting coauthorship using bibliographic network embedding (2023)
0.04
0.04380688 = sum of:
0.03170564 = product of:
0.12682256 = sum of:
0.12682256 = weight(_text_:authors in 917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12682256 = score(doc=917,freq=8.0), product of:
0.25179064 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.05523161 = queryNorm
0.50368255 = fieldWeight in 917, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=917)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.01210124 = product of:
0.03630372 = sum of:
0.03630372 = weight(_text_:c in 917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03630372 = score(doc=917,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1905162 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.05523161 = queryNorm
0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 917, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=917)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Coauthorship prediction applies predictive analytics to bibliographic data to predict authors who are highly likely to be coauthors. In this study, we propose an approach for coauthorship prediction based on bibliographic network embedding through a graph-based bibliographic data model that can be used to model common bibliographic data, including papers, terms, sources, authors, departments, research interests, universities, and countries. A real-world dataset released by AMiner that includes more than 2 million papers, 8 million citations, and 1.7 million authors were integrated into a large bibliographic network using the proposed bibliographic data model. Translation-based methods were applied to the entities and relationships to generate their low-dimensional embeddings while preserving their connectivity information in the original bibliographic network. We applied machine learning algorithms to embeddings that represent the coauthorship relationships of the two authors and achieved high prediction results. The reference model, which is the combination of a network embedding size of 100, the most basic translation-based method, and a gradient boosting method achieved an F1 score of 0.9 and even higher scores are obtainable with different embedding sizes and more advanced embedding methods. Thus, the strengths of the proposed approach lie in its customizable components under a unified framework.
-
Milard, B.; Pitarch, Y.: Egocentric cocitation networks and scientific papers destinies (2023)
0.04
0.041869365 = sum of:
0.026903126 = product of:
0.107612506 = sum of:
0.107612506 = weight(_text_:authors in 918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.107612506 = score(doc=918,freq=4.0), product of:
0.25179064 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.05523161 = queryNorm
0.42738882 = fieldWeight in 918, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=918)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.01496624 = product of:
0.04489872 = sum of:
0.04489872 = weight(_text_:22 in 918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04489872 = score(doc=918,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19341168 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05523161 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 918, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=918)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- To what extent is the destiny of a scientific paper shaped by the cocitation network in which it is involved? What are the social contexts that can explain these structuring? Using bibliometric data, interviews with researchers, and social network analysis, this article proposes a typology based on egocentric cocitation networks that displays a quadruple structuring (before and after publication): polarization, clusterization, atomization, and attrition. It shows that the academic capital of the authors and the intellectual resources of their research are key factors of these destinies, as are the social relations between the authors concerned. The circumstances of the publishing are also correlated with the structuring of the egocentric cocitation networks, showing how socially embedded they are. Finally, the article discusses the contribution of these original networks to the analyze of scientific production and its dynamics.
- Date
- 21. 3.2023 19:22:14
-
Krattenthaler, C.: Was der h-Index wirklich aussagt (2021)
0.04
0.04182183 = product of:
0.08364366 = sum of:
0.08364366 = product of:
0.12546548 = sum of:
0.058085952 = weight(_text_:c in 407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058085952 = score(doc=407,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1905162 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.05523161 = queryNorm
0.3048872 = fieldWeight in 407, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=407)
0.06737953 = weight(_text_:h in 407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06737953 = score(doc=407,freq=10.0), product of:
0.13722013 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.05523161 = queryNorm
0.4910324 = fieldWeight in 407, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=407)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Diese Note legt dar, dass der sogenannte h-Index (Hirschs bibliometrischer Index) im Wesentlichen dieselbe Information wiedergibt wie die Gesamtanzahl von Zitationen von Publikationen einer Autorin oder eines Autors, also ein nutzloser bibliometrischer Index ist. Dies basiert auf einem faszinierenden Satz der Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie, der hier ebenfalls erläutert wird.
- Content
- Vgl.: DOI: 10.1515/dmvm-2021-0050. Auch abgedruckt u.d.T.: 'Der h-Index - "ein nutzloser bibliometrischer Index"' in Open Password Nr. 1007 vom 06.12.2021 unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzM3NCwiZDI3MzMzOTEwMzUzIiwwLDAsMzQ4LDFd.
- Object
- h-index
- Source
- Mitteilungen der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung. 2021, H.3, S.124-128
-
Manley, S.: Letters to the editor and the race for publication metrics (2022)
0.04
0.03965456 = sum of:
0.022193946 = product of:
0.088775784 = sum of:
0.088775784 = weight(_text_:authors in 547) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.088775784 = score(doc=547,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25179064 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.05523161 = queryNorm
0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 547, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=547)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.017460614 = product of:
0.05238184 = sum of:
0.05238184 = weight(_text_:22 in 547) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05238184 = score(doc=547,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19341168 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05523161 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 547, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=547)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- This article discusses how letters to the editor boost publishing metrics for journals and authors, and then examines letters published since 2015 in six elite journals, including the Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. The initial findings identify some potentially anomalous use of letters and unusual self-citation patterns. The article proposes that Clarivate Analytics consider slightly reconfiguring the Journal Impact Factor to more fairly account for letters and that journals transparently explain their letter submission policies.
- Date
- 6. 4.2022 19:22:26
-
Chou, C.; Chu, T.: ¬An analysis of BERT (NLP) for assisted subject indexing for Project Gutenberg (2022)
0.04
0.039135683 = sum of:
0.022193946 = product of:
0.088775784 = sum of:
0.088775784 = weight(_text_:authors in 1139) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.088775784 = score(doc=1139,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25179064 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.05523161 = queryNorm
0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 1139, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1139)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.016941737 = product of:
0.05082521 = sum of:
0.05082521 = weight(_text_:c in 1139) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05082521 = score(doc=1139,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1905162 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.05523161 = queryNorm
0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 1139, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1139)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- In light of AI (Artificial Intelligence) and NLP (Natural language processing) technologies, this article examines the feasibility of using AI/NLP models to enhance the subject indexing of digital resources. While BERT (Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers) models are widely used in scholarly communities, the authors assess whether BERT models can be used in machine-assisted indexing in the Project Gutenberg collection, through suggesting Library of Congress subject headings filtered by certain Library of Congress Classification subclass labels. The findings of this study are informative for further research on BERT models to assist with automatic subject indexing for digital library collections.
-
Baecker, D.: ¬Der Frosch, die Fliege und der Mensch : zum Tod von Humberto Maturana (2021)
0.04
0.03749917 = product of:
0.07499834 = sum of:
0.07499834 = product of:
0.11249751 = sum of:
0.037666302 = weight(_text_:h in 236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037666302 = score(doc=236,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13722013 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.05523161 = queryNorm
0.27449545 = fieldWeight in 236, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=236)
0.0748312 = weight(_text_:22 in 236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0748312 = score(doc=236,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19341168 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05523161 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 236, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=236)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Biographed
- Maturana, H.
- Date
- 7. 5.2021 22:10:24
-
Eyert, F.: Mathematische Wissenschaftskommunikation in der digitalen Gesellschaft (2023)
0.04
0.03749917 = product of:
0.07499834 = sum of:
0.07499834 = product of:
0.11249751 = sum of:
0.037666302 = weight(_text_:h in 1001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037666302 = score(doc=1001,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13722013 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.05523161 = queryNorm
0.27449545 = fieldWeight in 1001, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1001)
0.0748312 = weight(_text_:22 in 1001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0748312 = score(doc=1001,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19341168 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05523161 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1001, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1001)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Mitteilungen der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung. 2023, H.1, S.22-25
-
Zhao, Y.(C.); Du, J.T.; Pang, N.; Raju, J.; Yan, H.: JASIST special issue on ICT4D and intersections with the information field : guest editorial (2023)
0.04
0.036757916 = product of:
0.07351583 = sum of:
0.07351583 = product of:
0.11027375 = sum of:
0.07260744 = weight(_text_:c in 859) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07260744 = score(doc=859,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1905162 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.05523161 = queryNorm
0.381109 = fieldWeight in 859, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=859)
0.037666302 = weight(_text_:h in 859) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037666302 = score(doc=859,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13722013 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.05523161 = queryNorm
0.27449545 = fieldWeight in 859, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=859)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
