-
Zheng, X.; Chen, J.; Yan, E.; Ni, C.: Gender and country biases in Wikipedia citations to scholarly publications (2023)
0.08
0.08234873 = sum of:
0.031000247 = product of:
0.12400099 = sum of:
0.12400099 = weight(_text_:authors in 886) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12400099 = score(doc=886,freq=6.0), product of:
0.23689525 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.051964227 = queryNorm
0.52344227 = fieldWeight in 886, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=886)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.051348478 = product of:
0.07702272 = sum of:
0.034780107 = weight(_text_:j in 886) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034780107 = score(doc=886,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16511615 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.051964227 = queryNorm
0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 886, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=886)
0.04224261 = weight(_text_:22 in 886) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04224261 = score(doc=886,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18196987 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051964227 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 886, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=886)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Ensuring Wikipedia cites scholarly publications based on quality and relevancy without biases is critical to credible and fair knowledge dissemination. We investigate gender- and country-based biases in Wikipedia citation practices using linked data from the Web of Science and a Wikipedia citation dataset. Using coarsened exact matching, we show that publications by women are cited less by Wikipedia than expected, and publications by women are less likely to be cited than those by men. Scholarly publications by authors affiliated with non-Anglosphere countries are also disadvantaged in getting cited by Wikipedia, compared with those by authors affiliated with Anglosphere countries. The level of gender- or country-based inequalities varies by research field, and the gender-country intersectional bias is prominent in math-intensive STEM fields. To ensure the credibility and equality of knowledge presentation, Wikipedia should consider strategies and guidelines to cite scholarly publications independent of the gender and country of authors.
- Date
- 22. 1.2023 18:53:32
-
Bullard, J.; Dierking, A.; Grundner, A.: Centring LGBT2QIA+ subjects in knowledge organization systems (2020)
0.07
0.06924648 = sum of:
0.017898 = product of:
0.071592 = sum of:
0.071592 = weight(_text_:authors in 5996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.071592 = score(doc=5996,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23689525 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.051964227 = queryNorm
0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 5996, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5996)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.051348478 = product of:
0.07702272 = sum of:
0.034780107 = weight(_text_:j in 5996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034780107 = score(doc=5996,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16511615 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.051964227 = queryNorm
0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 5996, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5996)
0.04224261 = weight(_text_:22 in 5996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04224261 = score(doc=5996,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18196987 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051964227 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5996, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5996)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This paper contains a report of two interdependent knowledge organization (KO) projects for an LGBT2QIA+ library. The authors, in the context of volunteer library work for an independent library, redesigned the classification system and subject cataloguing guidelines to centre LGBT2QIA+ subjects. We discuss the priorities of creating and maintaining knowledge organization systems for a historically marginalized community and address the challenge that queer subjectivity poses to the goals of KO. The classification system features a focus on identity and physically reorganizes the library space in a way that accounts for the multiple and overlapping labels that constitute the currently articulated boundaries of this community. The subject heading system focuses on making visible topics and elements of identity made invisible by universal systems and by the newly implemented classification system. We discuss how this project may inform KO for other marginalized subjects, particularly through process and documentation that prioritizes transparency and the acceptance of an unfinished endpoint for queer KO.
- Date
- 6.10.2020 21:22:33
-
Kim, J.(im); Kim, J.(enna): Effect of forename string on author name disambiguation (2020)
0.07
0.06570895 = sum of:
0.014915001 = product of:
0.059660003 = sum of:
0.059660003 = weight(_text_:authors in 5930) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059660003 = score(doc=5930,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23689525 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.051964227 = queryNorm
0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 5930, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5930)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.050793946 = product of:
0.07619092 = sum of:
0.040988747 = weight(_text_:j in 5930) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040988747 = score(doc=5930,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16511615 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.051964227 = queryNorm
0.2482419 = fieldWeight in 5930, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5930)
0.035202175 = weight(_text_:22 in 5930) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035202175 = score(doc=5930,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18196987 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051964227 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5930, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5930)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- In author name disambiguation, author forenames are used to decide which name instances are disambiguated together and how much they are likely to refer to the same author. Despite such a crucial role of forenames, their effect on the performance of heuristic (string matching) and algorithmic disambiguation is not well understood. This study assesses the contributions of forenames in author name disambiguation using multiple labeled data sets under varying ratios and lengths of full forenames, reflecting real-world scenarios in which an author is represented by forename variants (synonym) and some authors share the same forenames (homonym). The results show that increasing the ratios of full forenames substantially improves both heuristic and machine-learning-based disambiguation. Performance gains by algorithmic disambiguation are pronounced when many forenames are initialized or homonyms are prevalent. As the ratios of full forenames increase, however, they become marginal compared to those by string matching. Using a small portion of forename strings does not reduce much the performances of both heuristic and algorithmic disambiguation methods compared to using full-length strings. These findings provide practical suggestions, such as restoring initialized forenames into a full-string format via record linkage for improved disambiguation performances.
- Date
- 11. 7.2020 13:22:58
-
Bager, J.: ¬Die Text-KI ChatGPT schreibt Fachtexte, Prosa, Gedichte und Programmcode (2023)
0.07
0.0655237 = product of:
0.1310474 = sum of:
0.1310474 = sum of:
0.028350435 = weight(_text_:h in 835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028350435 = score(doc=835,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12910248 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.051964227 = queryNorm
0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 835, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=835)
0.046373475 = weight(_text_:j in 835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046373475 = score(doc=835,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16511615 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.051964227 = queryNorm
0.28085366 = fieldWeight in 835, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=835)
0.056323484 = weight(_text_:22 in 835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056323484 = score(doc=835,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18196987 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051964227 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 835, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=835)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 29.12.2022 18:22:55
- Source
- c't. 2023, H.1, S.46- [https://www.heise.de/select/ct/2023/1/2233908274346530870]
-
Zhang, L.; Lu, W.; Yang, J.: LAGOS-AND : a large gold standard dataset for scholarly author name disambiguation (2023)
0.06
0.063883394 = sum of:
0.021092996 = product of:
0.084371984 = sum of:
0.084371984 = weight(_text_:authors in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.084371984 = score(doc=883,freq=4.0), product of:
0.23689525 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.051964227 = queryNorm
0.35615736 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.042790398 = product of:
0.0641856 = sum of:
0.02898342 = weight(_text_:j in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02898342 = score(doc=883,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16511615 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.051964227 = queryNorm
0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
0.035202175 = weight(_text_:22 in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035202175 = score(doc=883,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18196987 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051964227 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- In this article, we present a method to automatically build large labeled datasets for the author ambiguity problem in the academic world by leveraging the authoritative academic resources, ORCID and DOI. Using the method, we built LAGOS-AND, two large, gold-standard sub-datasets for author name disambiguation (AND), of which LAGOS-AND-BLOCK is created for clustering-based AND research and LAGOS-AND-PAIRWISE is created for classification-based AND research. Our LAGOS-AND datasets are substantially different from the existing ones. The initial versions of the datasets (v1.0, released in February 2021) include 7.5 M citations authored by 798 K unique authors (LAGOS-AND-BLOCK) and close to 1 M instances (LAGOS-AND-PAIRWISE). And both datasets show close similarities to the whole Microsoft Academic Graph (MAG) across validations of six facets. In building the datasets, we reveal the variation degrees of last names in three literature databases, PubMed, MAG, and Semantic Scholar, by comparing author names hosted to the authors' official last names shown on the ORCID pages. Furthermore, we evaluate several baseline disambiguation methods as well as the MAG's author IDs system on our datasets, and the evaluation helps identify several interesting findings. We hope the datasets and findings will bring new insights for future studies. The code and datasets are publicly available.
- Date
- 22. 1.2023 18:40:36
-
Gabler, S.: Vergabe von DDC-Sachgruppen mittels eines Schlagwort-Thesaurus (2021)
0.06
0.06124425 = sum of:
0.051583108 = product of:
0.20633243 = sum of:
0.20633243 = weight(_text_:3a in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20633243 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
0.4405533 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.051964227 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.00966114 = product of:
0.02898342 = sum of:
0.02898342 = weight(_text_:j in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02898342 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16511615 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.051964227 = queryNorm
0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Content
- Master thesis Master of Science (Library and Information Studies) (MSc), Universität Wien. Advisor: Christoph Steiner. Vgl.: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371680244_Vergabe_von_DDC-Sachgruppen_mittels_eines_Schlagwort-Thesaurus. DOI: 10.25365/thesis.70030. Vgl. dazu die Präsentation unter: https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=0CAIQw7AJahcKEwjwoZzzytz_AhUAAAAAHQAAAAAQAg&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.dnb.de%2Fdownload%2Fattachments%2F252121510%2FDA3%2520Workshop-Gabler.pdf%3Fversion%3D1%26modificationDate%3D1671093170000%26api%3Dv2&psig=AOvVaw0szwENK1or3HevgvIDOfjx&ust=1687719410889597&opi=89978449.
-
Hottenrott, H.; Rose, M.E.; Lawson, C.: ¬The rise of multiple institutional affiliations in academia (2021)
0.06
0.06111434 = sum of:
0.025833542 = product of:
0.103334166 = sum of:
0.103334166 = weight(_text_:authors in 313) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.103334166 = score(doc=313,freq=6.0), product of:
0.23689525 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.051964227 = queryNorm
0.43620193 = fieldWeight in 313, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=313)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.0352808 = product of:
0.0529212 = sum of:
0.017719023 = weight(_text_:h in 313) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017719023 = score(doc=313,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12910248 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.051964227 = queryNorm
0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 313, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=313)
0.035202175 = weight(_text_:22 in 313) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035202175 = score(doc=313,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18196987 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051964227 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 313, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=313)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This study provides the first systematic, international, large-scale evidence on the extent and nature of multiple institutional affiliations on journal publications. Studying more than 15 million authors and 22 million articles from 40 countries we document that: In 2019, almost one in three articles was (co-)authored by authors with multiple affiliations and the share of authors with multiple affiliations increased from around 10% to 16% since 1996. The growth of multiple affiliations is prevalent in all fields and it is stronger in high impact journals. About 60% of multiple affiliations are between institutions from within the academic sector. International co-affiliations, which account for about a quarter of multiple affiliations, most often involve institutions from the United States, China, Germany and the United Kingdom, suggesting a core-periphery network. Network analysis also reveals a number communities of countries that are more likely to share affiliations. We discuss potential causes and show that the timing of the rise in multiple affiliations can be linked to the introduction of more competitive funding structures such as "excellence initiatives" in a number of countries. We discuss implications for science and science policy.
-
Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.; Abdoli, M.; Stuart, E.; Makita, M.; Wilson, P.; Levitt, J.: Why are coauthored academic articles more cited : higher quality or larger audience? (2023)
0.06
0.0577054 = sum of:
0.014915001 = product of:
0.059660003 = sum of:
0.059660003 = weight(_text_:authors in 995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059660003 = score(doc=995,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23689525 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.051964227 = queryNorm
0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 995, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=995)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.042790398 = product of:
0.0641856 = sum of:
0.02898342 = weight(_text_:j in 995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02898342 = score(doc=995,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16511615 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.051964227 = queryNorm
0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 995, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=995)
0.035202175 = weight(_text_:22 in 995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035202175 = score(doc=995,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18196987 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051964227 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 995, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=995)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Collaboration is encouraged because it is believed to improve academic research, supported by indirect evidence in the form of more coauthored articles being more cited. Nevertheless, this might not reflect quality but increased self-citations or the "audience effect": citations from increased awareness through multiple author networks. We address this with the first science wide investigation into whether author numbers associate with journal article quality, using expert peer quality judgments for 122,331 articles from the 2014-20 UK national assessment. Spearman correlations between author numbers and quality scores show moderately strong positive associations (0.2-0.4) in the health, life, and physical sciences, but weak or no positive associations in engineering and social sciences, with weak negative/positive or no associations in various arts and humanities, and a possible negative association for decision sciences. This gives the first systematic evidence that greater numbers of authors associates with higher quality journal articles in the majority of academia outside the arts and humanities, at least for the UK. Positive associations between team size and citation counts in areas with little association between team size and quality also show that audience effects or other nonquality factors account for the higher citation rates of coauthored articles in some fields.
- Date
- 22. 6.2023 18:11:50
-
Hocker, J.; Schindler, C.; Rittberger, M.: Participatory design for ontologies : a case study of an open science ontology for qualitative coding schemas (2020)
0.05
0.05489915 = sum of:
0.020666832 = product of:
0.08266733 = sum of:
0.08266733 = weight(_text_:authors in 179) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08266733 = score(doc=179,freq=6.0), product of:
0.23689525 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.051964227 = queryNorm
0.34896153 = fieldWeight in 179, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=179)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.03423232 = product of:
0.051348478 = sum of:
0.023186738 = weight(_text_:j in 179) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023186738 = score(doc=179,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16511615 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.051964227 = queryNorm
0.14042683 = fieldWeight in 179, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=179)
0.028161742 = weight(_text_:22 in 179) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028161742 = score(doc=179,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18196987 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051964227 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 179, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=179)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Purpose The open science movement calls for transparent and retraceable research processes. While infrastructures to support these practices in qualitative research are lacking, the design needs to consider different approaches and workflows. The paper bases on the definition of ontologies as shared conceptualizations of knowledge (Borst, 1999). The authors argue that participatory design is a good way to create these shared conceptualizations by giving domain experts and future users a voice in the design process via interviews, workshops and observations. Design/methodology/approach This paper presents a novel approach for creating ontologies in the field of open science using participatory design. As a case study the creation of an ontology for qualitative coding schemas is presented. Coding schemas are an important result of qualitative research, and reuse can yield great potential for open science making qualitative research more transparent, enhance sharing of coding schemas and teaching of qualitative methods. The participatory design process consisted of three parts: a requirement analysis using interviews and an observation, a design phase accompanied by interviews and an evaluation phase based on user tests as well as interviews. Findings The research showed several positive outcomes due to participatory design: higher commitment of users, mutual learning, high quality feedback and better quality of the ontology. However, there are two obstacles in this approach: First, contradictive answers by the interviewees, which needs to be balanced; second, this approach takes more time due to interview planning and analysis. Practical implications The implication of the paper is in the long run to decentralize the design of open science infrastructures and to involve parties affected on several levels. Originality/value In ontology design, several methods exist by using user-centered design or participatory design doing workshops. In this paper, the authors outline the potentials for participatory design using mainly interviews in creating an ontology for open science. The authors focus on close contact to researchers in order to build the ontology upon the expert's knowledge.
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
-
Smith, A.O.; Hemsley, J.: Memetics as informational difference : offering an information-centric conception of memes (2022)
0.05
0.04912252 = sum of:
0.03946138 = product of:
0.15784553 = sum of:
0.15784553 = weight(_text_:authors in 682) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15784553 = score(doc=682,freq=14.0), product of:
0.23689525 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.051964227 = queryNorm
0.66630936 = fieldWeight in 682, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=682)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.00966114 = product of:
0.02898342 = sum of:
0.02898342 = weight(_text_:j in 682) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02898342 = score(doc=682,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16511615 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.051964227 = queryNorm
0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 682, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=682)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Purpose Information scientists may find value in studying cultural information evolution and information diffusion through memetics. Information studies in memetics have often found datafication in memetics research difficult. Meanwhile, current memetic scholarship elsewhere is abundant in data due to their focus on Internet artifacts. This paper offers a way to close the datafication gap for information researchers by associating information data with "differences" between memetic documents. Design/methodology/approach This work offers a joint theory and methodology invested in information-oriented memetics. This methodology of differences is developed from a content analysis of difference on a collection of images with visual similarities. Findings The authors find that this kind of analysis provides a heuristic method for quantitatively bounding where one meme ends and another begins. The authors also find that this approach helps describe the dynamics of memetic media in such a way that the authors can datafy information or cultural evolution more clearly. Originality/value Here the authors offer an approach for studying cultural information evolution through the study of memes. In doing so, the authors forward a methodology of difference which leverages content analysis in order to outline how it functions practically. The authors propose a quantitative methodology to assess differences between versions of document contents in order to examine what a particular meme is. The authors also move toward showing the information structure which defines a meme.
-
Bertram, J.: ¬Ein Online-Lehrkonzept für die Inhaltserschließung (2021)
0.04
0.043588948 = product of:
0.087177895 = sum of:
0.087177895 = product of:
0.13076684 = sum of:
0.04961326 = weight(_text_:h in 401) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04961326 = score(doc=401,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12910248 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.051964227 = queryNorm
0.38429362 = fieldWeight in 401, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=401)
0.08115358 = weight(_text_:j in 401) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08115358 = score(doc=401,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16511615 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.051964227 = queryNorm
0.4914939 = fieldWeight in 401, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=401)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 72(2021) H.2/3, S.119-127
-
Wüllner, J.: Obsidian - das Organisationstalent : Ideen, Notizen, Planungen, Projekte - diese App kann für Schule, Uni und Beruf hilfreich sein (2023)
0.04
0.042790398 = product of:
0.085580796 = sum of:
0.085580796 = product of:
0.1283712 = sum of:
0.05796684 = weight(_text_:j in 1080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05796684 = score(doc=1080,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16511615 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.051964227 = queryNorm
0.35106707 = fieldWeight in 1080, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1080)
0.07040435 = weight(_text_:22 in 1080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07040435 = score(doc=1080,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18196987 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051964227 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1080, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1080)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 27. 1.2023 16:22:55
-
Ibrahim, G.M.; Taylor, M.: Krebszellen manipulieren Neurone : Gliome (2023)
0.04
0.042336956 = product of:
0.08467391 = sum of:
0.08467391 = product of:
0.12701087 = sum of:
0.04252565 = weight(_text_:h in 1203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04252565 = score(doc=1203,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12910248 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.051964227 = queryNorm
0.32939452 = fieldWeight in 1203, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1203)
0.08448522 = weight(_text_:22 in 1203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08448522 = score(doc=1203,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18196987 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051964227 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1203, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1203)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 2023, H.10, S.22-24
-
Milard, B.; Pitarch, Y.: Egocentric cocitation networks and scientific papers destinies (2023)
0.04
0.039392464 = sum of:
0.025311595 = product of:
0.10124638 = sum of:
0.10124638 = weight(_text_:authors in 918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10124638 = score(doc=918,freq=4.0), product of:
0.23689525 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.051964227 = queryNorm
0.42738882 = fieldWeight in 918, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=918)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.01408087 = product of:
0.04224261 = sum of:
0.04224261 = weight(_text_:22 in 918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04224261 = score(doc=918,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18196987 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051964227 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 918, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=918)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- To what extent is the destiny of a scientific paper shaped by the cocitation network in which it is involved? What are the social contexts that can explain these structuring? Using bibliometric data, interviews with researchers, and social network analysis, this article proposes a typology based on egocentric cocitation networks that displays a quadruple structuring (before and after publication): polarization, clusterization, atomization, and attrition. It shows that the academic capital of the authors and the intellectual resources of their research are key factors of these destinies, as are the social relations between the authors concerned. The circumstances of the publishing are also correlated with the structuring of the egocentric cocitation networks, showing how socially embedded they are. Finally, the article discusses the contribution of these original networks to the analyze of scientific production and its dynamics.
- Date
- 21. 3.2023 19:22:14
-
Brinkhus, J.: Regelungen zur Erhaltung des digitalen und digitalisierten Kulturerbes im deutschen Urheberrecht : vom UrhWissG zur Umsetzung der DSM-RL (2021)
0.04
0.037361957 = product of:
0.074723914 = sum of:
0.074723914 = product of:
0.112085864 = sum of:
0.04252565 = weight(_text_:h in 191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04252565 = score(doc=191,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12910248 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.051964227 = queryNorm
0.32939452 = fieldWeight in 191, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=191)
0.069560215 = weight(_text_:j in 191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.069560215 = score(doc=191,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16511615 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.051964227 = queryNorm
0.4212805 = fieldWeight in 191, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=191)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- RuZ - Recht und Zugang. 2 (2021) H.1, S.56-67
-
Kleiner, J.; Lorenz, R.: KI mit Bewusstsein? : Künstliche Intelligenz (2024)
0.04
0.037361957 = product of:
0.074723914 = sum of:
0.074723914 = product of:
0.112085864 = sum of:
0.04252565 = weight(_text_:h in 1210) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04252565 = score(doc=1210,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12910248 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.051964227 = queryNorm
0.32939452 = fieldWeight in 1210, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1210)
0.069560215 = weight(_text_:j in 1210) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.069560215 = score(doc=1210,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16511615 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.051964227 = queryNorm
0.4212805 = fieldWeight in 1210, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1210)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 2024, H.2, S.74-78
-
Manley, S.: Letters to the editor and the race for publication metrics (2022)
0.04
0.03730868 = sum of:
0.020880999 = product of:
0.083523996 = sum of:
0.083523996 = weight(_text_:authors in 547) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.083523996 = score(doc=547,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23689525 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.051964227 = queryNorm
0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 547, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=547)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.016427683 = product of:
0.049283046 = sum of:
0.049283046 = weight(_text_:22 in 547) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049283046 = score(doc=547,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18196987 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051964227 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 547, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=547)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- This article discusses how letters to the editor boost publishing metrics for journals and authors, and then examines letters published since 2015 in six elite journals, including the Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. The initial findings identify some potentially anomalous use of letters and unusual self-citation patterns. The article proposes that Clarivate Analytics consider slightly reconfiguring the Journal Impact Factor to more fairly account for letters and that journals transparently explain their letter submission policies.
- Date
- 6. 4.2022 19:22:26
-
Pooja, K.M.; Mondal, S.; Chandra, J.: ¬A graph combination with edge pruning-based approach for author name disambiguation (2020)
0.04
0.03549468 = sum of:
0.025833542 = product of:
0.103334166 = sum of:
0.103334166 = weight(_text_:authors in 59) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.103334166 = score(doc=59,freq=6.0), product of:
0.23689525 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.051964227 = queryNorm
0.43620193 = fieldWeight in 59, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=59)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.00966114 = product of:
0.02898342 = sum of:
0.02898342 = weight(_text_:j in 59) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02898342 = score(doc=59,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16511615 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.051964227 = queryNorm
0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 59, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=59)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Author name disambiguation (AND) is a challenging problem due to several issues such as missing key identifiers, same name corresponding to multiple authors, along with inconsistent representation. Several techniques have been proposed but maintaining consistent accuracy levels over all data sets is still a major challenge. We identify two major issues associated with the AND problem. First, the namesake problem in which two or more authors with the same name publishes in a similar domain. Second, the diverse topic problem in which one author publishes in diverse topical domains with a different set of coauthors. In this work, we initially propose a method named ATGEP for AND that addresses the namesake issue. We evaluate the performance of ATGEP using various ambiguous name references collected from the Arnetminer Citation (AC) and Web of Science (WoS) data set. We empirically show that the two aforementioned problems are crucial to address the AND problem that are difficult to handle using state-of-the-art techniques. To handle the diverse topic issue, we extend ATGEP to a new variant named ATGEP-web that considers external web information of the authors. Experiments show that with enough information available from external web sources ATGEP-web can significantly improve the results further compared with ATGEP.
-
Koch, C.: Was ist Bewusstsein? (2020)
0.04
0.0352808 = product of:
0.0705616 = sum of:
0.0705616 = product of:
0.1058424 = sum of:
0.035438046 = weight(_text_:h in 5723) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035438046 = score(doc=5723,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12910248 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.051964227 = queryNorm
0.27449545 = fieldWeight in 5723, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5723)
0.07040435 = weight(_text_:22 in 5723) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07040435 = score(doc=5723,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18196987 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051964227 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5723, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5723)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 17. 1.2020 22:15:11
- Source
- Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 2020, H.2, S.12-17
-
Baecker, D.: ¬Der Frosch, die Fliege und der Mensch : zum Tod von Humberto Maturana (2021)
0.04
0.0352808 = product of:
0.0705616 = sum of:
0.0705616 = product of:
0.1058424 = sum of:
0.035438046 = weight(_text_:h in 236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035438046 = score(doc=236,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12910248 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.051964227 = queryNorm
0.27449545 = fieldWeight in 236, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=236)
0.07040435 = weight(_text_:22 in 236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07040435 = score(doc=236,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18196987 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051964227 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 236, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=236)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Biographed
- Maturana, H.
- Date
- 7. 5.2021 22:10:24
