Search (223 results, page 1 of 12)

  • × year_i:[2020 TO 2030}
  1. Barité, M.; Parentelli, V.; Rodríguez Casaballe, N.; Suárez, M.V.: Interdisciplinarity and postgraduate teaching of knowledge organization (KO) : elements for a necessary dialogue (2023) 0.10
    0.10316075 = sum of:
      0.014868473 = product of:
        0.05947389 = sum of:
          0.05947389 = weight(_text_:authors in 1125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05947389 = score(doc=1125,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23615624 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05180212 = queryNorm
              0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 1125, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1125)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.08829227 = sum of:
        0.053199906 = weight(_text_:n in 1125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053199906 = score(doc=1125,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22335295 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05180212 = queryNorm
            0.23818761 = fieldWeight in 1125, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1125)
        0.03509236 = weight(_text_:22 in 1125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03509236 = score(doc=1125,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1814022 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05180212 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1125, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1125)
    
    Abstract
    Interdisciplinarity implies the previous existence of disciplinary fields and not their dissolution. As a general objective, we propose to establish an initial approach to the emphasis given to interdisciplinarity in the teaching of KO, through the teaching staff responsible for postgraduate courses focused on -or related to the KO, in Ibero-American universities. For conducting the research, the framework and distribution of a survey addressed to teachers is proposed, based on four lines of action: 1. The way teachers manage the concept of interdisciplinarity. 2. The place that teachers give to interdisciplinarity in KO. 3. Assessment of interdisciplinary content that teachers incorporate into their postgraduate courses. 4. Set of teaching strategies and resources used by teachers to include interdisciplinarity in the teaching of KO. The study analyzed 22 responses. Preliminary results show that KO teachers recognize the influence of other disciplines in concepts, theories, methods, and applications, but no consensus has been reached regarding which disciplines and authors are the ones who build interdisciplinary bridges. Among other conclusions, the study strongly suggests that environmental and social tensions are reflected in subject representation, especially in the construction of friendly knowl­edge organization systems with interdisciplinary visions, and in the expressions through which information is sought.
  2. Asubiaro, T.V.; Onaolapo, S.: ¬A comparative study of the coverage of African journals in Web of Science, Scopus, and CrossRef (2023) 0.08
    0.07702549 = product of:
      0.15405098 = sum of:
        0.15405098 = sum of:
          0.11895862 = weight(_text_:n in 992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11895862 = score(doc=992,freq=10.0), product of:
              0.22335295 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05180212 = queryNorm
              0.53260374 = fieldWeight in 992, product of:
                3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                  10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=992)
          0.03509236 = weight(_text_:22 in 992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03509236 = score(doc=992,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1814022 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05180212 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 992, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=992)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This is the first study that evaluated the coverage of journals from Africa in Web of Science, Scopus, and CrossRef. A list of active journals published in each of the 55 African countries was compiled from Ulrich's periodicals directory and African Journals Online (AJOL) website. Journal master lists for Web of Science, Scopus, and CrossRef were searched for the African journals. A total of 2,229 unique active African journals were identified from Ulrich (N = 2,117, 95.0%) and AJOL (N = 243, 10.9%) after removing duplicates. The volume of African journals in Web of Science and Scopus databases is 7.4% (N = 166) and 7.8% (N = 174), respectively, compared to the 45.6% (N = 1,017) covered in CrossRef. While making up only 17.% of all the African journals, South African journals had the best coverage in the two most authoritative databases, accounting for 73.5% and 62.1% of all the African journals in Web of Science and Scopus, respectively. In contrast, Nigeria published 44.5% of all the African journals. The distribution of the African journals is biased in favor of Medical, Life and Health Sciences and Humanities and the Arts in the three databases. The low representation of African journals in CrossRef, a free indexing infrastructure that could be harnessed for building an African-centric research indexing database, is concerning.
    Date
    22. 6.2023 14:09:06
  3. Krüger, N.; Pianos, T.: Lernmaterialien für junge Forschende in den Wirtschaftswissenschaften als Open Educational Resources (OER) (2021) 0.06
    0.06180459 = product of:
      0.12360918 = sum of:
        0.12360918 = sum of:
          0.07447987 = weight(_text_:n in 252) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07447987 = score(doc=252,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.22335295 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05180212 = queryNorm
              0.33346266 = fieldWeight in 252, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=252)
          0.049129307 = weight(_text_:22 in 252) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049129307 = score(doc=252,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1814022 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05180212 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 252, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=252)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 5.2021 12:43:05
  4. Haimson, O.L.; Carter, A.J.; Corvite, S.; Wheeler, B.; Wang, L.; Liu, T.; Lige, A.: ¬The major life events taxonomy : social readjustment, social media information sharing, and online network separation during times of life transition (2021) 0.06
    0.0551642 = product of:
      0.1103284 = sum of:
        0.1103284 = sum of:
          0.07523604 = weight(_text_:n in 263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07523604 = score(doc=263,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.22335295 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05180212 = queryNorm
              0.33684817 = fieldWeight in 263, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=263)
          0.03509236 = weight(_text_:22 in 263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03509236 = score(doc=263,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1814022 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05180212 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 263, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=263)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    When people experience major life changes, this often impacts their self-presentation, networks, and online behavior in substantial ways. To effectively study major life transitions and events, we surveyed a large U.S. sample (n = 554) to create the Major Life Events Taxonomy, a list of 121 life events in 12 categories. We then applied this taxonomy to a second large U.S. survey sample (n = 775) to understand on average how much social readjustment each event required, how likely each event was to be shared on social media with different types of audiences, and how much online network separation each involved. We found that social readjustment is positively correlated with sharing on social media, with both broad audiences and close ties as well as in online spaces separate from one's network of known ties. Some life transitions involve high levels of sharing with both separate audiences and broad audiences on social media, providing evidence for what previous research has called social media as social transition machinery. Researchers can use the Major Life Events Taxonomy to examine how people's life transition experiences relate to their behaviors, technology use, and health and well-being outcomes.
    Date
    10. 6.2021 19:22:47
  5. Zheng, X.; Chen, J.; Yan, E.; Ni, C.: Gender and country biases in Wikipedia citations to scholarly publications (2023) 0.05
    0.051958956 = sum of:
      0.030903539 = product of:
        0.123614155 = sum of:
          0.123614155 = weight(_text_:authors in 886) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.123614155 = score(doc=886,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.23615624 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05180212 = queryNorm
              0.52344227 = fieldWeight in 886, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=886)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.021055417 = product of:
        0.042110834 = sum of:
          0.042110834 = weight(_text_:22 in 886) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042110834 = score(doc=886,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1814022 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05180212 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 886, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=886)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Ensuring Wikipedia cites scholarly publications based on quality and relevancy without biases is critical to credible and fair knowledge dissemination. We investigate gender- and country-based biases in Wikipedia citation practices using linked data from the Web of Science and a Wikipedia citation dataset. Using coarsened exact matching, we show that publications by women are cited less by Wikipedia than expected, and publications by women are less likely to be cited than those by men. Scholarly publications by authors affiliated with non-Anglosphere countries are also disadvantaged in getting cited by Wikipedia, compared with those by authors affiliated with Anglosphere countries. The level of gender- or country-based inequalities varies by research field, and the gender-country intersectional bias is prominent in math-intensive STEM fields. To ensure the credibility and equality of knowledge presentation, Wikipedia should consider strategies and guidelines to cite scholarly publications independent of the gender and country of authors.
    Date
    22. 1.2023 18:53:32
  6. Milard, B.; Pitarch, Y.: Egocentric cocitation networks and scientific papers destinies (2023) 0.05
    0.04628805 = sum of:
      0.025232634 = product of:
        0.100930534 = sum of:
          0.100930534 = weight(_text_:authors in 918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.100930534 = score(doc=918,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.23615624 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05180212 = queryNorm
              0.42738882 = fieldWeight in 918, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=918)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.021055417 = product of:
        0.042110834 = sum of:
          0.042110834 = weight(_text_:22 in 918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042110834 = score(doc=918,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1814022 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05180212 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 918, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=918)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    To what extent is the destiny of a scientific paper shaped by the cocitation network in which it is involved? What are the social contexts that can explain these structuring? Using bibliometric data, interviews with researchers, and social network analysis, this article proposes a typology based on egocentric cocitation networks that displays a quadruple structuring (before and after publication): polarization, clusterization, atomization, and attrition. It shows that the academic capital of the authors and the intellectual resources of their research are key factors of these destinies, as are the social relations between the authors concerned. The circumstances of the publishing are also correlated with the structuring of the egocentric cocitation networks, showing how socially embedded they are. Finally, the article discusses the contribution of these original networks to the analyze of scientific production and its dynamics.
    Date
    21. 3.2023 19:22:14
  7. Manley, S.: Letters to the editor and the race for publication metrics (2022) 0.05
    0.045380514 = sum of:
      0.02081586 = product of:
        0.08326344 = sum of:
          0.08326344 = weight(_text_:authors in 547) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08326344 = score(doc=547,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23615624 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05180212 = queryNorm
              0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 547, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=547)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.024564654 = product of:
        0.049129307 = sum of:
          0.049129307 = weight(_text_:22 in 547) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049129307 = score(doc=547,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1814022 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05180212 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 547, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=547)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This article discusses how letters to the editor boost publishing metrics for journals and authors, and then examines letters published since 2015 in six elite journals, including the Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. The initial findings identify some potentially anomalous use of letters and unusual self-citation patterns. The article proposes that Clarivate Analytics consider slightly reconfiguring the Journal Impact Factor to more fairly account for letters and that journals transparently explain their letter submission policies.
    Date
    6. 4.2022 19:22:26
  8. Rha, E.Y.; Belkin, N.: Exploring social aspects of task perception using cognitive sociology : a social cognitive perspective (2020) 0.04
    0.044146135 = product of:
      0.08829227 = sum of:
        0.08829227 = sum of:
          0.053199906 = weight(_text_:n in 5973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.053199906 = score(doc=5973,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.22335295 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05180212 = queryNorm
              0.23818761 = fieldWeight in 5973, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5973)
          0.03509236 = weight(_text_:22 in 5973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03509236 = score(doc=5973,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1814022 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05180212 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5973, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5973)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  9. Hoeber, O.; Harvey, M.; Dewan Sagar, S.A.; Pointon, M.: ¬The effects of simulated interruptions on mobile search tasks (2022) 0.04
    0.044146135 = product of:
      0.08829227 = sum of:
        0.08829227 = sum of:
          0.053199906 = weight(_text_:n in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.053199906 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.22335295 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05180212 = queryNorm
              0.23818761 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
          0.03509236 = weight(_text_:22 in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03509236 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1814022 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05180212 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    While it is clear that using a mobile device can interrupt real-world activities such as walking or driving, the effects of interruptions on mobile device use have been under-studied. We are particularly interested in how the ambient distraction of walking while using a mobile device, combined with the occurrence of simulated interruptions of different levels of cognitive complexity, affect web search activities. We have established an experimental design to study how the degree of cognitive complexity of simulated interruptions influences both objective and subjective search task performance. In a controlled laboratory study (n = 27), quantitative and qualitative data were collected on mobile search performance, perceptions of the interruptions, and how participants reacted to the interruptions, using a custom mobile eye-tracking app, a questionnaire, and observations. As expected, more cognitively complex interruptions resulted in increased overall task completion times and higher perceived impacts. Interestingly, the effect on the resumption lag or the actual search performance was not significant, showing the resiliency of people to resume their tasks after an interruption. Implications from this study enhance our understanding of how interruptions objectively and subjectively affect search task performance, motivating the need for providing explicit mobile search support to enable recovery from interruptions.
    Date
    3. 5.2022 13:22:33
  10. Park, M.S.; Park, J.H.; Kim, H.; Lee, J.H.; Park, H.: Measuring the impacts of quantity and trustworthiness of information on COVID-19 vaccination intent (2023) 0.04
    0.044146135 = product of:
      0.08829227 = sum of:
        0.08829227 = sum of:
          0.053199906 = weight(_text_:n in 996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.053199906 = score(doc=996,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.22335295 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05180212 = queryNorm
              0.23818761 = fieldWeight in 996, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=996)
          0.03509236 = weight(_text_:22 in 996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03509236 = score(doc=996,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1814022 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05180212 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 996, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=996)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The COVID-19 crisis provided an opportunity for information professionals to rethink the role of information in individuals' decision making such as vaccine uptake. Unlike previous studies, which often considered information as a single factor among others, this study examined the impact of the quantity and trustworthiness of information on people's adoption of information for vaccination decisions based on the information adoption model. We analyzed COVID-19 Preventive Behavior Survey data collected by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology from Facebook users (N = 82,213) in 15 countries between October 2020 and March 2021. The results of logistic regression analyses indicate that reasonable quantity and trustworthiness of information were positively related to COVID-19 vaccination intent. But excessive and less than the desired amount of information was more likely to have negative impacts on vaccination intent. The degrees of trust in the mediums and in the sources were associated with the level of vaccine acceptance. But the effects of trustworthiness accorded to information sources showed variations across sources and mediums. Implications for information professionals and suggestions for policies are discussed.
    Date
    22. 6.2023 18:20:47
  11. Hottenrott, H.; Rose, M.E.; Lawson, C.: ¬The rise of multiple institutional affiliations in academia (2021) 0.04
    0.04329913 = sum of:
      0.025752952 = product of:
        0.10301181 = sum of:
          0.10301181 = weight(_text_:authors in 313) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.10301181 = score(doc=313,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.23615624 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05180212 = queryNorm
              0.43620193 = fieldWeight in 313, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=313)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.01754618 = product of:
        0.03509236 = sum of:
          0.03509236 = weight(_text_:22 in 313) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03509236 = score(doc=313,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1814022 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05180212 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 313, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=313)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This study provides the first systematic, international, large-scale evidence on the extent and nature of multiple institutional affiliations on journal publications. Studying more than 15 million authors and 22 million articles from 40 countries we document that: In 2019, almost one in three articles was (co-)authored by authors with multiple affiliations and the share of authors with multiple affiliations increased from around 10% to 16% since 1996. The growth of multiple affiliations is prevalent in all fields and it is stronger in high impact journals. About 60% of multiple affiliations are between institutions from within the academic sector. International co-affiliations, which account for about a quarter of multiple affiliations, most often involve institutions from the United States, China, Germany and the United Kingdom, suggesting a core-periphery network. Network analysis also reveals a number communities of countries that are more likely to share affiliations. We discuss potential causes and show that the timing of the rise in multiple affiliations can be linked to the introduction of more competitive funding structures such as "excellence initiatives" in a number of countries. We discuss implications for science and science policy.
  12. Hobert, A.; Jahn, N.; Mayr, P.; Schmidt, B.; Taubert, N.: Open access uptake in Germany 2010-2018 : adoption in a diverse research landscape (2021) 0.04
    0.041989192 = sum of:
      0.011894777 = product of:
        0.04757911 = sum of:
          0.04757911 = weight(_text_:authors in 250) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04757911 = score(doc=250,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23615624 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05180212 = queryNorm
              0.20147301 = fieldWeight in 250, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=250)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.030094413 = product of:
        0.060188826 = sum of:
          0.060188826 = weight(_text_:n in 250) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.060188826 = score(doc=250,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.22335295 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05180212 = queryNorm
              0.26947853 = fieldWeight in 250, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=250)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    This study investigates the development of open access (OA) to journal articles from authors affiliated with German universities and non-university research institutions in the period 2010-2018. Beyond determining the overall share of openly available articles, a systematic classification of distinct categories of OA publishing allowed us to identify different patterns of adoption of OA. Taking into account the particularities of the German research landscape, variations in terms of productivity, OA uptake and approaches to OA are examined at the meso-level and possible explanations are discussed. The development of the OA uptake is analysed for the different research sectors in Germany (universities, non-university research institutes of the Helmholtz Association, Fraunhofer Society, Max Planck Society, Leibniz Association, and government research agencies). Combining several data sources (incl. Web of Science, Unpaywall, an authority file of standardised German affiliation information, the ISSN-Gold-OA 3.0 list, and OpenDOAR), the study confirms the growth of the OA share mirroring the international trend reported in related studies. We found that 45% of all considered articles during the observed period were openly available at the time of analysis. Our findings show that subject-specific repositories are the most prevalent type of OA. However, the percentages for publication in fully OA journals and OA via institutional repositories show similarly steep increases. Enabling data-driven decision-making regarding the implementation of OA in Germany at the institutional level, the results of this study furthermore can serve as a baseline to assess the impact recent transformative agreements with major publishers will likely have on scholarly communication.
  13. Thelwall, M.; Maflahi, N.: Academic collaboration rates and citation associations vary substantially between countries and fields (2020) 0.04
    0.041468427 = sum of:
      0.014868473 = product of:
        0.05947389 = sum of:
          0.05947389 = weight(_text_:authors in 5952) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05947389 = score(doc=5952,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23615624 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05180212 = queryNorm
              0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 5952, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5952)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.026599953 = product of:
        0.053199906 = sum of:
          0.053199906 = weight(_text_:n in 5952) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.053199906 = score(doc=5952,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.22335295 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05180212 = queryNorm
              0.23818761 = fieldWeight in 5952, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5952)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Research collaboration is promoted by governments and research funders, but if the relative prevalence and merits of collaboration vary internationally then different national and disciplinary strategies may be needed to promote it. This study compares the team size and field normalized citation impact of research across all 27 Scopus broad fields in the 10 countries with the most journal articles indexed in Scopus 2008-2012. The results show that team size varies substantially by discipline and country, with Japan (4.2) having two-thirds more authors per article than the United Kingdom (2.5). Solo authorship is rare in China (4%) but common in the United Kingdom (27%). While increasing team size associates with higher citation impact in almost all countries and fields, this association is much weaker in China than elsewhere. There are also field differences in the association between citation impact and collaboration. For example, larger team sizes in the Business, Management & Accounting category do not seem to associate with greater research impact, and for China and India, solo authorship associates with higher citation impact in this field. Overall, there are substantial international and field differences in the extent to which researchers collaborate and the extent to which collaboration associates with higher citation impact.
  14. Jahn, N.; Matthias, L.; Laakso, M.: Toward transparency of hybrid open access through publisher-provided metadata : an article-level study of Elsevier (2022) 0.04
    0.041468427 = sum of:
      0.014868473 = product of:
        0.05947389 = sum of:
          0.05947389 = weight(_text_:authors in 448) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05947389 = score(doc=448,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23615624 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05180212 = queryNorm
              0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 448, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=448)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.026599953 = product of:
        0.053199906 = sum of:
          0.053199906 = weight(_text_:n in 448) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.053199906 = score(doc=448,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.22335295 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05180212 = queryNorm
              0.23818761 = fieldWeight in 448, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=448)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    With the growth of open access (OA), the financial flows in scholarly journal publishing have become increasingly complex, but comprehensive data on and transparency of these flows are still lacking. The opacity is especially concerning for hybrid OA, where subscription-based journals publish individual articles as OA if an optional fee is paid. This study addresses the lack of transparency by leveraging Elsevier article metadata and provides the first publisher-level study of hybrid OA uptake and invoicing. Our results show that Elsevier's hybrid OA uptake has grown steadily but slowly from 2015 to 2019, doubling the number of hybrid OA articles published per year and increasing the share of OA articles in Elsevier's hybrid journals from 2.6 to 3.7% of all articles. Further, we find that most hybrid OA articles were invoiced directly to authors, followed by articles invoiced through agreements with research funders, institutions, or consortia, with only a few funding bodies driving hybrid OA uptake. As such, our findings point to the role of publishing agreements and OA policies in hybrid OA publishing. Our results further demonstrate the value of publisher-provided metadata to improve the transparency in scholarly publishing.
  15. Bullard, J.; Dierking, A.; Grundner, A.: Centring LGBT2QIA+ subjects in knowledge organization systems (2020) 0.04
    0.03889758 = sum of:
      0.017842166 = product of:
        0.071368665 = sum of:
          0.071368665 = weight(_text_:authors in 5996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.071368665 = score(doc=5996,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23615624 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05180212 = queryNorm
              0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 5996, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5996)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.021055417 = product of:
        0.042110834 = sum of:
          0.042110834 = weight(_text_:22 in 5996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042110834 = score(doc=5996,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1814022 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05180212 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5996, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5996)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper contains a report of two interdependent knowledge organization (KO) projects for an LGBT2QIA+ library. The authors, in the context of volunteer library work for an independent library, redesigned the classification system and subject cataloguing guidelines to centre LGBT2QIA+ subjects. We discuss the priorities of creating and maintaining knowledge organization systems for a historically marginalized community and address the challenge that queer subjectivity poses to the goals of KO. The classification system features a focus on identity and physically reorganizes the library space in a way that accounts for the multiple and overlapping labels that constitute the currently articulated boundaries of this community. The subject heading system focuses on making visible topics and elements of identity made invisible by universal systems and by the newly implemented classification system. We discuss how this project may inform KO for other marginalized subjects, particularly through process and documentation that prioritizes transparency and the acceptance of an unfinished endpoint for queer KO.
    Date
    6.10.2020 21:22:33
  16. Cooke, N.A.; Kitzie, V.L.: Outsiders-within-Library and Information Science : reprioritizing the marginalized in critical sociocultural work (2021) 0.04
    0.03889758 = sum of:
      0.017842166 = product of:
        0.071368665 = sum of:
          0.071368665 = weight(_text_:authors in 351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.071368665 = score(doc=351,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23615624 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05180212 = queryNorm
              0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 351, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=351)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.021055417 = product of:
        0.042110834 = sum of:
          0.042110834 = weight(_text_:22 in 351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042110834 = score(doc=351,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1814022 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05180212 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 351, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=351)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    While there are calls for new paradigms within the profession, there are also existing subgenres that fit this bill if they would be fully acknowledged. This essay argues that underrepresented and otherwise marginalized scholars have already produced significant work within social, cultural, and community-oriented paradigms; social justice and advocacy; and, diversity, equity, and inclusion. This work has not been sufficiently valued or promoted. Furthermore, the surrounding structural conditions have resulted in the dismissal, violently reviewed and rejected, and erased work of underrepresented scholars, and the stigmatization and delegitimization of their work. These scholars are "outsiders-within-LIS." By identifying the outsiders-within-LIS through the frame of standpoint theories, the authors are suggesting that a new paradigm does not need to be created; rather, an existing paradigm needs to be recognized and reprioritized. This reprioritized paradigm of critical sociocultural work has and will continue to creatively enrich and expand the field and decolonize LIS curricula.
    Date
    18. 9.2021 13:22:27
  17. Zhang, L.; Lu, W.; Yang, J.: LAGOS-AND : a large gold standard dataset for scholarly author name disambiguation (2023) 0.04
    0.038573377 = sum of:
      0.021027196 = product of:
        0.084108785 = sum of:
          0.084108785 = weight(_text_:authors in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.084108785 = score(doc=883,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.23615624 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05180212 = queryNorm
              0.35615736 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.01754618 = product of:
        0.03509236 = sum of:
          0.03509236 = weight(_text_:22 in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03509236 = score(doc=883,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1814022 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05180212 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In this article, we present a method to automatically build large labeled datasets for the author ambiguity problem in the academic world by leveraging the authoritative academic resources, ORCID and DOI. Using the method, we built LAGOS-AND, two large, gold-standard sub-datasets for author name disambiguation (AND), of which LAGOS-AND-BLOCK is created for clustering-based AND research and LAGOS-AND-PAIRWISE is created for classification-based AND research. Our LAGOS-AND datasets are substantially different from the existing ones. The initial versions of the datasets (v1.0, released in February 2021) include 7.5 M citations authored by 798 K unique authors (LAGOS-AND-BLOCK) and close to 1 M instances (LAGOS-AND-PAIRWISE). And both datasets show close similarities to the whole Microsoft Academic Graph (MAG) across validations of six facets. In building the datasets, we reveal the variation degrees of last names in three literature databases, PubMed, MAG, and Semantic Scholar, by comparing author names hosted to the authors' official last names shown on the ORCID pages. Furthermore, we evaluate several baseline disambiguation methods as well as the MAG's author IDs system on our datasets, and the evaluation helps identify several interesting findings. We hope the datasets and findings will bring new insights for future studies. The code and datasets are publicly available.
    Date
    22. 1.2023 18:40:36
  18. Belabbes, M.A.; Ruthven, I.; Moshfeghi, Y.; Rasmussen Pennington, D.: Information overload : a concept analysis (2023) 0.04
    0.038573377 = sum of:
      0.021027196 = product of:
        0.084108785 = sum of:
          0.084108785 = weight(_text_:authors in 950) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.084108785 = score(doc=950,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.23615624 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05180212 = queryNorm
              0.35615736 = fieldWeight in 950, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=950)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.01754618 = product of:
        0.03509236 = sum of:
          0.03509236 = weight(_text_:22 in 950) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03509236 = score(doc=950,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1814022 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05180212 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 950, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=950)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose With the shift to an information-based society and to the de-centralisation of information, information overload has attracted a growing interest in the computer and information science research communities. However, there is no clear understanding of the meaning of the term, and while there have been many proposed definitions, there is no consensus. The goal of this work was to define the concept of "information overload". In order to do so, a concept analysis using Rodgers' approach was performed. Design/methodology/approach A concept analysis using Rodgers' approach based on a corpus of documents published between 2010 and September 2020 was conducted. One surrogate for "information overload", which is "cognitive overload" was identified. The corpus of documents consisted of 151 documents for information overload and ten for cognitive overload. All documents were from the fields of computer science and information science, and were retrieved from three databases: Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) Digital Library, SCOPUS and Library and Information Science Abstracts (LISA). Findings The themes identified from the authors' concept analysis allowed us to extract the triggers, manifestations and consequences of information overload. They found triggers related to information characteristics, information need, the working environment, the cognitive abilities of individuals and the information environment. In terms of manifestations, they found that information overload manifests itself both emotionally and cognitively. The consequences of information overload were both internal and external. These findings allowed them to provide a definition of information overload. Originality/value Through the authors' concept analysis, they were able to clarify the components of information overload and provide a definition of the concept.
    Date
    22. 4.2023 19:27:56
  19. Palsdottir, A.: Data literacy and management of research data : a prerequisite for the sharing of research data (2021) 0.04
    0.035316907 = product of:
      0.070633814 = sum of:
        0.070633814 = sum of:
          0.042559925 = weight(_text_:n in 183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042559925 = score(doc=183,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.22335295 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05180212 = queryNorm
              0.19055009 = fieldWeight in 183, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=183)
          0.02807389 = weight(_text_:22 in 183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.02807389 = score(doc=183,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1814022 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05180212 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 183, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=183)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate the knowledge and attitude about research data management, the use of data management methods and the perceived need for support, in relation to participants' field of research. Design/methodology/approach This is a quantitative study. Data were collected by an email survey and sent to 792 academic researchers and doctoral students. Total response rate was 18% (N = 139). The measurement instrument consisted of six sets of questions: about data management plans, the assignment of additional information to research data, about metadata, standard file naming systems, training at data management methods and the storing of research data. Findings The main finding is that knowledge about the procedures of data management is limited, and data management is not a normal practice in the researcher's work. They were, however, in general, of the opinion that the university should take the lead by recommending and offering access to the necessary tools of data management. Taken together, the results indicate that there is an urgent need to increase the researcher's understanding of the importance of data management that is based on professional knowledge and to provide them with resources and training that enables them to make effective and productive use of data management methods. Research limitations/implications The survey was sent to all members of the population but not a sample of it. Because of the response rate, the results cannot be generalized to all researchers at the university. Nevertheless, the findings may provide an important understanding about their research data procedures, in particular what characterizes their knowledge about data management and attitude towards it. Practical implications Awareness of these issues is essential for information specialists at academic libraries, together with other units within the universities, to be able to design infrastructures and develop services that suit the needs of the research community. The findings can be used, to develop data policies and services, based on professional knowledge of best practices and recognized standards that assist the research community at data management. Originality/value The study contributes to the existing literature about research data management by examining the results by participants' field of research. Recognition of the issues is critical in order for information specialists in collaboration with universities to design relevant infrastructures and services for academics and doctoral students that can promote their research data management.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  20. Hocker, J.; Schindler, C.; Rittberger, M.: Participatory design for ontologies : a case study of an open science ontology for qualitative coding schemas (2020) 0.03
    0.034639306 = sum of:
      0.02060236 = product of:
        0.08240944 = sum of:
          0.08240944 = weight(_text_:authors in 179) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08240944 = score(doc=179,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.23615624 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05180212 = queryNorm
              0.34896153 = fieldWeight in 179, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=179)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.014036945 = product of:
        0.02807389 = sum of:
          0.02807389 = weight(_text_:22 in 179) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.02807389 = score(doc=179,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1814022 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05180212 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 179, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=179)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose The open science movement calls for transparent and retraceable research processes. While infrastructures to support these practices in qualitative research are lacking, the design needs to consider different approaches and workflows. The paper bases on the definition of ontologies as shared conceptualizations of knowledge (Borst, 1999). The authors argue that participatory design is a good way to create these shared conceptualizations by giving domain experts and future users a voice in the design process via interviews, workshops and observations. Design/methodology/approach This paper presents a novel approach for creating ontologies in the field of open science using participatory design. As a case study the creation of an ontology for qualitative coding schemas is presented. Coding schemas are an important result of qualitative research, and reuse can yield great potential for open science making qualitative research more transparent, enhance sharing of coding schemas and teaching of qualitative methods. The participatory design process consisted of three parts: a requirement analysis using interviews and an observation, a design phase accompanied by interviews and an evaluation phase based on user tests as well as interviews. Findings The research showed several positive outcomes due to participatory design: higher commitment of users, mutual learning, high quality feedback and better quality of the ontology. However, there are two obstacles in this approach: First, contradictive answers by the interviewees, which needs to be balanced; second, this approach takes more time due to interview planning and analysis. Practical implications The implication of the paper is in the long run to decentralize the design of open science infrastructures and to involve parties affected on several levels. Originality/value In ontology design, several methods exist by using user-centered design or participatory design doing workshops. In this paper, the authors outline the potentials for participatory design using mainly interviews in creating an ontology for open science. The authors focus on close contact to researchers in order to build the ontology upon the expert's knowledge.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22

Languages

  • e 176
  • d 45
  • pt 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 207
  • el 41
  • m 5
  • p 5
  • s 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…